User talk:Anviltops

July 2013

Hello, I'm United States Man. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to 2013 El Reno tornado because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! United States Man (talk) 20:29, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2013 El Reno tornado, you may be blocked from editing. United States Man (talk) 20:36, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. United States Man (talk) 20:42, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2013 El Reno tornado

Hey there and welcome to Wikipedia.

I saw your recent edit to the 2013 El Reno tornado article, including a revert of United States Man (talk · contribs); however, your edits appeared to be nonconstructive as they broke syntax (removing the first level header for the section titled "Casualties and Impact"). Additionally, though the information is valid, the context is confusing. You led it off with "however" but no contrasting statement to the information in the preceding paragraph was given.

Regards, Cyclonebiskit (talk) 20:34, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Before you continue to revert edits on the article, please understand that continued action in this manner could result in your being temporarily blocked in accordance with Wikipedia's three revert rule. Instead, it is more appropriate to discuss the situation here as I have attempted to do with the above post. I would greatly appreciate your cooperation. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 20:44, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Anviltops reported by User:Cyclonebiskit (Result: ). Thank you. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 11:07, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Kuru (talk) 11:55, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anviltops, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Cyclonebiskit (talk) 16:41, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]