User talk:Treybien

This user left Wikipedia. Treybien has not edited Wikipedia since June 25, 2020. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! If you need help feel free to drop a line at my talk page. :) --Actown ^e 03:53, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

John Travolta

Good work on the John Travolta article! Welcome to WP!--Lwieise -=- Talk to Me 03:49, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Victor E. Marsden

Superb job of changing that article from a laughable mess. Now it's mostly an article about someone who probably doesn't merit an article at all -- it's really yet another of Ludvikus' articles about the history of the Protocols, and someday we'll figure out a way to collate his obviously extensive research into something more suited to Wikipedia.

Keith Olbermann

I just wanted to take a moment to thank you for your cleanup on Keith Olbermann. Nice job. I'm sure someone will yell at you for the lack of edit summaries, but it won't be me. --BigScaryMike _{(Talk/Contrib)} 03:22, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Clapton article

Hi, it's nice to see someone even more liberal than I! I have a blog @ http://leftwingwiil.tumblr.com/ BUT more importantly, I noticed you did recent edit(s) to Eric Clapton. This article was demoted from being a Featured Article. I just wanted your opinion. I noticed you did not have an e-mail button as other Wikipedia editors do. if you want to answer the questions below, you can click onto V Schauf (talk) 19:19, 2 May 2012 (UTC) and press the "talk" link next to it. I want to make the Clapton article a Featured Article again. Do you think that this article deserved to be demoted? What would improve this article? Have you read Clapton's autobiography? I wanted to write to you and others who recently edited the Clapton article. Thanks for your time.V Schauf (talk) 19:19, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good cleanup

Good job on cleaning up Politics of Bill O'Reilly. Some of the editors have a less-than-pristine grasp of formal diction and tone; I've been meaning to work on it but have been without net access for a hot minute. Thanks! /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 20:37, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vince Neil

Nice work on the Vince Neil article. I had noticed that it needed some attention but hadn't got around to it. Jonesy (talk) 02:24, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Poison Ivy edits

Thuran was correct and I was wrong. Your edits were helpful; I had been looking at the wrong version when i reverted your changes. I apologize for the inconvenience. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 06:06, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Francis Dolarhyde and Buffalo Bill

Thanks for removing the section. Its always bothered me.--CyberGhostface (talk) 14:46, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perversion!

Thanks for improving the article, I've struggled with the wording several times, you did much better. Mjpresson (talk) 16:36, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed some of your edits

		The Minor Barnstar
		Thank you for the work you have been doing to The Beatles and related articles. LessHeard vanU (talk) 12:32, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Patti Davis

Thanks for adding all of those sources to Patti Davis. ·:· Will Beback ·:·

Anne Bonny

Hi, my apologies, I may have clobbered some useful edits you did while I was attempting to revert the vandalism by 82.17.95.83 - pls check. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 22:31, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur Rubinstein

Great work on the Arthur Rubinstein page! The article as a whole has a much better flow now.THD3 (talk) 11:02, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Island

Hey -- thanks for your excellent edits on the plot summary of The Island (2005 film). Also, just to let you know, I restored the detailed plot -- and then removed the fluffy OR stuff. Also, in the closing scene of the film, I don't recall seeing an island. Anyway, let's pick it up on the corresponding talk page. Thanks once again, --Otheus (talk) 22:50, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great NPOV work

		The Cleanup Barnstar
		Your extensive work on Troy Davis case has greatly improved the aricle. It has made the article unbiased and eliminated the POV tone. I thank you for your dedication to NPOV!!! JakeH07 (talk) 03:30, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto!

Thanks for your attention over the weekend to the Liz Cheney page...you improved it a lot. Phoebe13 (talk) 14:44, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Amelia Earhart

~~The article has been restored to an earlier version as your edits did not make sense and were not based on research, rather on stylistic conventions. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 12:05, 2 July 2009 (UTC).~~[reply]

Please excuse the rant, as I was too precipitous in dismissing your contributions, casting them aside since they were not accompanied by references. You are entirely right that there are errors in writing conventions that have to be addressed, and with that in mind, I am doing a thorough review of your edits and will restore them as appropriate. My only disclaimer is that this article since I started on it three years ago has been the scene of many edit conflicts, typically over content as few editors were preoccupied with style or writing issues. Thank you for your efforts to improve the article. One larger section of text that mysteriously has lost its source was, nonetheless restored to an earlier version. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 12:28, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Fairey's been on my watchlist for years, but I never could get myself to sit down and give it the go-over it needed (even more so after he got big with the Obama series and the article really exploded). I saw what you did and it was as good or better than what I could've done, therefore I feel justified in awarding this:

		The Original Barnstar
		For great work on cleaning up the Shepard Fairey article. Bobak (talk) 03:46, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rick Perry

Good edits on the Rick Perry article.Athene cunicularia (talk) 21:32, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:31, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (2011 film)

Good morning Treybien!

Good, and much needed copy-editing last night. Thank you. Just to let you know that a have changed lieutenant (not your's, I know) to lawyer. Also, changed "Soon afterward ... " to "At their next meeting, "

Trust you approve. Sincerely, -- Gareth Griffith-Jones/GG-J's Talk 08:37, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Freddy Lounds

Thanks for tightening up the article. Cheers! bd2412 T 04:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why so Serious?

		The Joker appreciation award.
		I award you for improving my page the way it's supposed to be by letting you live. May my legacy live on in this page. - The Joker

Jhenderson⁷⁷⁷ 02:00, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014 GA Thanks

Thank you for your editorial contributions to Frank Underwood (House of Cards).

This user helped promote Frank Underwood (House of Cards) to good article status.

.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:24, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Williams (jazz singer)

A page you previously contributed to, Joe Williams (jazz singer), had many prior revisions deleted due to copyright issues. For details please see Talk:Joe Williams (jazz singer). Your prior version may be temporarily restored upon request if you need it for reference to re-incorporate constructive edits that do not make use of the copyright infringing material. Please feel free to leave me a talk message if you need this done. Happy editing, — xaosflux ^Talk 22:29, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Colonel James Braddock

Hey there, I have noticed that you have done some editing to the Colonel James Braddock page. I really appreciate your help, especially since I created that page (under an old user name). I just wanted to ask that if you can of anything to help me keep this page up I really appreciate it. I want to add more to it but I am just trying to find the right things to add. Any help you can offer would be greatly appreciated! Thank you!Trooper 902 (talk) 22:54, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Million award

		The Million Award
		For your contributions to bring Joker (comics) (estimated annual readership: 1,501,160) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Bobnorwal (talk) 15:21, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Pride!

You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride!

What? Wiki Loves Pride, a campaign to document and photograph LGBT culture and history, including pride events
When? June 2015
How can you help?
1.) Create or improve LGBT-related articles and showcase the results of your work here

2.) Upload photographs or other media related to LGBT culture and history, including pride events, and add images to relevant Wikipedia articles; feel free to create a subpage with a gallery of your images (see examples from last year)

3.) Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)

Or, view or update the current list of Tasks. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. Visit the group's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome!

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's main talk page.

Thanks, and happy editing!

User:Another Believer and User:OR drohowa

One Hour Photo

Please note that, per WP:RS/IMDb, IMDb is not considered a reliable source and should not be used in citations. Thanks! DonIago (talk) 21:17, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rampage (Gotham)

How is Karen Jennings supposed to be Rampage in Gotham? Do you have a source that confirms this? As far as I can tell, they share the same first name, but that doesn't make them the same character. Is there viral marketing or something I don't know about that called her Rampage? DarkKnight2149 04:33, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Treybien. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations for over 100000 edits

		100000 Edits
		Congratulations on reaching 100000 edits on English wikipedia.The Wikipedia Community thanks you for your continuing efforts.Keep up the good work!

you can added this template to your user page.

This user has been awarded with the 100000 Edits award.

- CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 12:36, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Susan Smith

I'm guessing it was a mistake, but you added [[Category:Incest]] to Susan Smith. I'm not sure what about her has anything to do with that, so I removed it. {MordeKyle} ☢ 00:51, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Patricia Highsmith article

Please don't take it as a rebuff, but I removed the use of the decorative quotation markup in the Ripliad section. I added the "Quoting critics, scholars, authors" topic about markups in the talk page. So glad to know another editor has taken an interest in beefing up the article! :-) Pyxis Solitary (talk) 08:58, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Editor of the Week

		Editor of the Week
		Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your extensive improvements to the encyclopedia. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:Buster7 submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

I am proud to nominate Treybien to be Editor of the Week. He is an editor with over 100K edits which is quite an accomplishment and certainly deserving of acknowledgement. More notable, however, is the fact that 99% of those edits are to main articles space. That leaves a scant 1% for everything else. This is an editor that spends his time, hard at work, improving the encyclopedia...using his language skills to make things better, more understandable. Compliments on his talk page speak to his ability to improve articles without creating mayhem, strife or discord. "You greatly improved the article", "It's so much better now", "...the attention it needed", "You improved it alot", and many more.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient user box}}

Thanks again for your efforts! Lepricavark (talk) 15:30, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

One of the benefits of facilitating the Eddy award is that I get to search out and meet quality editors like yourself. Many veteran editors waste quality time at the various drama-laden pages of Wikipedia. They rarely see the hard working editors that fly under the radar and they begin to mistake WP as one argument after another. Editors like you are the heartbeat of Wikipedia. Thanks for all you do. Buster Seven Talk 20:36, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Francis Yockey

Hello there ... I'm puzzled as to why you wanted to remove "Although he was a devotee of Oswald Spengler (who was critical of the Nazis)," - which to me seems pertinent and important... Regards, David Mc - DLMcN@yahoo.com

New Page Reviewing

Hello, Treybien.

As one of Wikipedia's most experienced Wikipedia editors,
Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 04:28, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for Creation Reviewing

Hello, Treybien.

AfC submissions
Random submission

~6 weeks

1,013 pending submissions

Purge to update

I recently sent you an invitation to join NPP, but you also might be the right candidate for another related project, AfC, which is also extremely backlogged.
Would you please consider becoming an Articles for Creation reviewer? Articles for Creation reviewers help new users learn the ropes of creating their first articles, and identify whether topics are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Reviewing drafts doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia inclusion policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After requesting to be added to the project, reviewing is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the reviewing instructions before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 02:41, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help with the National Memo article

Dear Mike, I noticed that back in 2011 you edited Joe Conason article so I assume that you know the field. I kindly ask you to take a look at the The National Memo article. It has been undergoing dramatic edits and I ask for your assistance in editing/improving the article.

I while ago I was asked to make several minor edits to the article as paid editor. At that time the article had minimal content and was no more than a stub. I’ve added some information following the structure of such articles as Salon (website), HuffPost, Politico adding infobox, improving categories and adding some well-referenced info. The article started to look like a normal website/media article. After that it got heavily edited in two waves by editors deleting large chunks of well-written (ok, my personal view :)) and well-referenced information. I believe that some of these edits/deletions are extraneous and actually make the article worse/less useful to Wikipedia users. I also believe that The National Memo article has an undisputable notability. There is an interesting discussion about this at the article’s Talk page.

A lot of what is going all around this article is plain nonsense. So if you are interested in the subject / in improving the article, please take a look at January 10th version or January 29th version. Also if you have any suggestions on improving the article, please share. Thank you in advance. -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 15:29, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

12 years of editing

Hey, Treybien. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 00:33, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Black Tie White Noise, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New section.

		The Editor's Barnstar
		For your general, ongoing diligence across multiple articles across the years. Always appreciated. Keep up the good work! Kieronoldham (talk) 01:05, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jared Fogle article

Hi! I know it was a long time ago... I found a slight error in fact in this edit.

Fogle was not arrested at the time, nor was he charged yet: "Fogle was not arrested or charged with any crimes, but the now-former Subway spokesman's house was searched two months after Russell Thomas, former executive director of the Jared Foundation, was arrested on charges related to child pornography."

AFAIK Fogle was never taken into custody until the day he formally pleaded guilty in court and was sentenced. (he also had not yet been prosecuted) WhisperToMe (talk) 10:56, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keith Ellison

You should probably join the discussion at talk:Keith Ellison. The editors there are not aware that you reinserted the material that they find questionable. Since they have a 3-1 majority, they are not even bothering to respond to the issues that I raise. You can see how they are so agenda driven, that in this revert they overwrote minor template errors fixed by an uninvolved editor. If you join the discussion, they will be forced to discuss the issues. BarbadosKen (talk) 18:03, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that your contribution into the talk page was in the wrong section. The section where you wrote was active when those same editors refused to allow any mention of the incident. They have since softened a little bit, and are now trying to suppress the controversy about the existence of the video. BarbadosKen (talk) 22:28, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry.

Treybien (talk) 15:30, 19 August 2018

Linking within quotes

Treybien, regarding this and this, the reason I avoided linking within quotes is per what the "Linking" section of WP:MOSQUOTE advises. That stated, the wording there used to be stricter. It was softened following the RfC now seen at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Linking/Archive 19#RfC about linking in quotations. Anyway, I just wanted to let you know why I hadn't linked the terms you did. There's also the fact that people usually know what homosexuality, heterosexuality and bisexuality mean (although there are bisexual definition aspects that readers might be interested in learning about). Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 18:02, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jodie Foster

Thank you for your c/e's at this page :) - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 22:33, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!
From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:16, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wilhelm II, German Emperor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reichstag (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:48, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguated links

Just to let you know, Viacom is now a disambiguation page. So when you link to the company, the way you did at Demi Lovato, please use:

[[Viacom (2005–present)|Viacom]]

Thank you for your edits and your support in this! P. I. Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there 15:03, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Paraphilia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Masochism and Wiley

David Ruffin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Wiley

Tina Weymouth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Independent Music Awards

Tonya Harding (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Headlight Herald

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:25, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguated links

Once again, just to let you know, Viacom is now a disambiguation page. So when you link to the company, the way you did at T.I., please use:

[[Viacom (2005–present)|Viacom]]

Thank you for your edits and your support in this! P. I. Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there 18:39, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alex Trebek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Lost Highway (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jann

The Fountainhead (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Doubleday

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:13, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 3

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Charles Perrault (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Telegraph

Duncan D. Hunter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Christian

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:15, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Chewbacca (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cloud City

Crippled America (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to A More Perfect Union

Nien Nunb (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Endor

Reinhold Niebuhr (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hellenism

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Order 66 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:11, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mickey Doyle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jennifer Rubin (journalist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washingtonian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:11, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Homeland

Hi, I saw your major edit to Carrie Mathison and was wondering if you would like to help on the draf articals for Draft:Saul Berenson and Draft:Peter Quinn (Homeland)? — RealFakeKim T 17:29, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Smoked (Law & Order: Special Victims Unit), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ATF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Don Draper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:44, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

hi, thought you might be interested

Since you're on the history of Nicolle Wallace, thre are some request for comments on her talk page. Thought you might want to weigh in when you have time. The top one is at: Talk:Nicolle_Wallace#Rfc:_Should_how_she_found_out_she_was_let_go_from_the_View_be_included?.ImUglyButPrettyUgly (talk) 11:38, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Luke Alvez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Johnny Messner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:38, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Michonne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Brett Butler and Kevin Carroll

Saul Goodman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Marius Stan

Ted Kaczynski (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to VG

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:12, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying licensed material requires attribution

Hi. I see in a recent addition to Nicky Nichols you included material from a webpage that is available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 13:39, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Beelzebub (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Doubleday

Michael Ansara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Heart of Ice

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:17, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Richard Burr, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intelligencer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paul Shanley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Counterpunch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:22, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Radical centrism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doubleday (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:22, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dirty John, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:42, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spencer Reid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Derek Morgan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest characters has been nominated for renaming

Category:One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest characters has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 20:12, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fictional child sexual abuse victims has been nominated for deletion

Category:Fictional child sexual abuse victims has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 03:47, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fictional sexual assault victims has been nominated for deletion

Category:Fictional sexual assault victims has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 03:47, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:47, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FA review on Jabba the Hut

I have nominated Jabba the Hut for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. --George Ho (talk) 20:04, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Parker

Hi, Trebyien. I've been trying to find where The Riddler's "Patrick Parker" alias comes from, and the only source I've been able to find is your January 2014 edit of The Riddler's Wikipedia page. Can you enlighten me where you got it from? Thanks!

Nomination of Kay Adams-Corleone for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kay Adams-Corleone, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kay Adams-Corleone until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 (talk) 00:38, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of fictional antiheroes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of fictional antiheroes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional antiheroes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

–LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 00:07, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Nichols

Hi – I wanted to let you know I removed the Category:American rapists that you added in the Brian Nichols article because he was never convicted of the rape (see Talk:Brian Nichols#Accused rapist). Joriki (talk) 12:11, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mike Logan (Law & Order) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mike Logan (Law & Order), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Logan (Law & Order) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jack Crawford (character) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jack Crawford (character), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Crawford (character) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Will Graham (character) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Will Graham (character), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Will Graham (character) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mason Verger for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mason Verger, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mason Verger until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Frederick Chilton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frederick Chilton, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederick Chilton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fictional characters with disfigurements has been nominated for merging

Category:Fictional characters with disfigurements has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 22:48, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Adi Gallia (Star Wars)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Adi Gallia (Star Wars) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 10 § Adi Gallia (Star Wars) until a consensus is reached. TNstingray (talk) 13:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

missing

Hi. You are now listed as missing, as we seek to recognize those editors who impacted the project and are no longer contributing. Should you ever return or simply don't want to be listed, you are welcome to remove your name. Please do not see this message as any sort of prod to your activity on wiki, as we all would hope to enjoy life after having edited here. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removal from member list

You have been inactive for more than 6 months and have been removed from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee birthday list. If you become active again please feel free to re-add yourself.

Best wishes, Chris Troutman (talk) 17:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!