This is an archive of past discussions about User:Thryduulf. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
I consider this to be no consensus situation. I wrote a comment on talk page of User:Ruslik0, who did it, but he seems to be out now. Could You please reopen and relist the entry or explain me, why that shouldn't be done. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 19:19, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
The trial will only grant temporary rights to a limited number (10) users. They will only have the right for one month. At the end of it, the right WILL be removed.
Maybe that needs to be made more clear, in the proposal? Can we make that clearer - would that help?
Thanks for responding. To be 100% honest, I'm not sure myself if it will be a success, or a fail; nor am I sure what we will learn from a trial. However - hear me out; a) I cannot see a negative effect from a shirt trial on a tightly-limited number (let's face it, their actions are gonna be watched, by a LOT of people!) and b) whether it works or not, we will learn a lot. Also - again, juust being straight with you - I think something needs to change; after years of discussion about RfA, I would honestly strongly support a proposal for e.g. "Admins must wear a funny hat on Thursdays" - just to show things could change. I hope you understand where I am coming from, and all I wish is, that we could try to get consensus for any kind of trial. If that means proposing just "Chzz is given 'delete' rights for 1 day" then I'd fall back to that. I believe it is possible to adjust the proposal so that everyone is happy. I hope we can reach some agreement. Chzz ► 04:09, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Yeah, I get that. It's more how it will be judged a success or failure that I'm concerned about. Thryduulf (talk) 02:37, 29 November 2011 (UTC) Copied back from my talk [1] just to keep it threaded... Chzz ► 16:33, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
I don't think we will be able to say "Yes, that was a success" or "No, that fails" from this trial. But I do think it'll give us plenty to talk about, with a view to maybe refining it, or maybe scrapping the idea, or maybe coming up with something considerably different.
The point being - re. "funny hats on Thursdays" - that for years, we've been discussion change to RfA, with absolutely no effect. That's why I think any attempt at change - on a very very limited number of users, for a very limuted time, tightly controlled - is at least worth a try. The RfA community is somewhat entrenched; set in its ways; very resistance to change of any kind. Yet the rate of new admins is plummeting - and knock-on effects of certain attitudes (ie admin-is-a-big-deal, 'holier than though') is certainly one of the major influences on the massive fall in editor retention.
I don't want to waffle. Just... I think there is no significant risk to the trial, but there is a great chance of significant benefit; not necessarily in the immediate sense (of e.g. creating some new admins), but in terms of it being the start of true reform. Chzz ► 16:33, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Why? If you think I've made the wrong decision, then please explain why you think that. You were the only one arguing for deletion, and there was very little other contribution, which is rarely going to result in any consensus. It was open over three weeks and relisted twice, so I felt the chances of another relist bringing more input to the discussion was very low. Thryduulf (talk) 19:14, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Well, first off, I naturally have no personal interest in the article whatsoever, and I'm certainly not a deletionist. However, I nominated it of course because I naturally felt there would be a very fair chance that it would be deleted. From a purely neutral standpoint, if I had been uninvolved I would probably have closed it as 'delete' on the strength of the valid arguments put forward in a rational and objective way by Kudpung that demonstrate that the refs are far from reliable, and do nothing to assert notability, and I would have checked those refs for reliability and coverage, and searched for more before closing. Secondly that some of the 'keep' votes are of dubious validity, and that the keep votes do not offer any policy based rationale other than 'it's notable' (read: 'I like FatShark'), and that finally none of the voters responded to invitations to qualify their votes. The fact that there was generally a total disinterest from the community after so many relistings also tends to demonstrate that subject is little known and of low importance - although this is a subjective argument. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 19:36, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
It's not the job of the AfD closer to evaluate the sources in an article, nor to look for more. The job of the AfD closer is to evaluate the arguments presented in the discussion. There was your argument for deletion, based on the unreliability of sources; a counter argument that the sources did show enough for notability and nothing else of relevance. The deletion arguments were stronger, but not overwhelming and one user wanting deletion does not make a consensus. Take it to DRV if you want, but I don't see how this can be anything other than a no consensus closure. Thryduulf (talk) 19:42, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
If it is suspected that people are arguing either 'keep' or 'delete' on arguments that are clearly not in line with notability policy, or that their claims that sources are reliable when they are not, or that coverage is extensive when it is not, or have been claiming for sources that do not address the subject, then I believe it is part of the closer's job to take that into consideration. I equally believe that less weight should be accorded to a vote, whether keep or delete, from a user who appears to have registered during an AfD and ostensibly just for the purpose of voting in that AfD - apart from the possible sock that it might actually be. Nevertheless you will be relieved to know that I had no intention of wasting anyone's time with a delrev, as I said, I don't really care if it is kept or not - it's not a toxic article, and if the community's interest in it is anything to go by, the general public are hardly likely to view the page much either. I just wanted your take on it. Thanks for your feedback. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:10, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Block protocol. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
With the time sensitive Rs I have been searching around a bit but most of the obvious I think yo are already covered.
I did make {{Time_of_day_in_words}} once upon a time, and it is also available in French and Hungarian. It is about as much use as a snake in an arse kicking competition, though.
Thanks for all your hard work as a Wikipedian. It may not seem so, but at least one other editor notices.
Well you want to link to the actual article about the route GOCO proposed route doesn't exist, and GOCO (you used before) is a glossary of military abbreviations. Unless it's being operated by First Great Western, you don't want to be using FGW colours. Also, I'm not sure there is consensus for adding proposed routes to station articles - you'll need to ask about this at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways. Thryduulf (talk) 13:38, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
There are a number of articles which do show proposed routes. I'm not too sure on how to remove colours, however GOCO is now the Proper trading name for Go! Cooperative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chip123456 (talk • contribs) 14:01, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (people). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
Umm well WT:RM uses 30 days old and minimum of 5 threads left, so maybe go for that? (Also N.B. some archive bot templates' age parameters are in days, and others' are in hours, so be careful). It Is Me Heret / c14:24, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Ok, I've put the template for MiszaBot II on the page (that bot works in days, ClueBotII only in hours) and set it to 30 days old, 5 threads left and a maximum archive size of 60kb (the last is approximate maximum size of any of the existing archives, the smallest is only about 11kb). Thryduulf (talk) 15:01, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
give him the rope
The rope is in Ludwigs' hands, it is up to him how do deal with it, don't let yerself get baited into a tit-for-tat in a ArbCom case request, they hate that. We all felt the frustrations during the Muhammad/images and WT:NOT, wrestling between rehashing a counterpoint for the umpteenth time and wondering if we didn't, would he take that to mean "silence means consent". But this is different, let his most recent statement speak for itself. It speaks (practically screams) volumes about why & how these debates got so contentious. Tarc (talk) 19:01, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Sorry about that. I did get an edit conflict with that, but it showed me edit conflicting with the version I was editing - i.e. my word was shown as conflicting with an empty cell so I just played my word again. I didn't realise that it was a genuine edit conflict with another user rather than the spurious conflicts with myself I occasionally get. Sorry.
I've not reverted as such, but replaced my word with yours as DebashisM (talk·contribs) played between you leaving this message and me receiving it (I was grocery shopping). I'll leave a note on their page about it and so they might want to change their word so I suggest you either don't play or at least don't play off their word until they've had a chance to. Thryduulf (talk) 00:31, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
I am interested in adding a previously deleted article to a Wikia wiki to which it is particularly relevant. Please would you consider userfying the following article to my account :
All drivers are urged to switch off their engines when parked, loading or waiting at the roadside
More reliable Tube carries record-breaking numbers
Mayor hails new measures in 2012 to deliver cleaner air for London
December
Hammersmith Flyover closed due to structural defect found
Edgware Road signal improvements delivered early, paving way for longer, accessible, air-con trains
Mayor announces trial to cut harmful pollution at industrial and construction sites across London
Interim operator for Putney to Blackfriars River Bus service
TfL has today announced details of a strategic review of traffic movements through the Kings Cross area
Motorcycles to be allowed permanent access to bus lanes
Around 85 of London's 700 bus routes will be changed in some way during the 2012 Games
TfL ramps up safety efforts on London Tramlink
Major crackdown on dangerous pedicabs in central London
Emirates Air Line lands on iconic Tube map as first tower completed
Mayor heralds the arrival of the new bus for London
More local transport improvements for London Boroughs announced by Mayor
Mayor and DfT announce £10 million to cut pollution from Capital's bus fleet
Mayor hails successful bid to make more London Overground stations step free
Vibrant London life captured in Yayoi Kusama's new artwork for the Pocket Tube Map
Additional peak trains for the 200,000 Wimbledon branch passengers each day will bring fewer delays and extra capacity
Overall Transport for London (TfL) fares to rise by 5.6 per cent in 2012
Lewis Hamilton toasts free travel on London transport to welcome in the New Year
Out-of-hours deliveries during London 2012 Games are viable, trials show
Real time digital bus information proves a hit with Londoners
As part of Transport for London's (TfL) commitment to the mental and physical health of its 27,000 employees, the organisation has signed the Time to Change Pledge
November
Dial-a-Ride vehicles trialling biodiesel
Business welcomes Games transport 'hot spot' information to ensure London is 'open for business' in 2012
Green wall unveiled at Edware Road station
TfL saves £250 million by purchasing two maintenace companies working on DLR
Routes 29 and N29 converted to bendy bus
Woolwich Ferry returns to normal
Lighting replacement work on Tower Bridge to LED lighting
Northern Line platforms reopen at Tottenham Court Road
Continued trend of Tube reliabilty as passenger numbers grow
Routes 12 and 436 convert from Bendy bus to double decker
Central line trains overhauled for the 2012 Games and beyond
Bus stop arrangements change around Victoria to make way for improvement works
Crime on London's transport network falls again
Statford bus station reopens
New Acts of Kindness artwork now on Tube seats and trains
London charges ahead with wireless electric vehicle technology
Mayor and TfL set out action to make London's streets safer for cyclists
TfL calls for taxi demo to be cancelled
London Transport Veterans to take part in the annual Remembrance Sunday parade
Plans for improvement to Bank station go on public display
Mayor drives first New Bus for London off production line
London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games mascots join last leg of month-long Games themed walking relay
Northbound Blackwall Tunnel safety improvements completed more than a year early
October
Revamped service information boards make journeys easier for customers to plan
Transport for London leads the way with new Quantity Surveying apprenticeships
Dial-a-Ride offers new NVQ in Customer Service
Tube Lines sets green standard as double winner
More services on TfL's London Overground from December
New Tube Poems remember war dead and reflect on quest for peace
London Underground bridge between Ravenscourt Park and Hammersmith wins Small Civil Engineering Project category at the British Construction Industry Awards for its replacement in one weekend
Tramlink rewarded for helping restore Croydon
Oyster pay as you go to be extended to national rail stations between Liverpool Street and Hertford East
Transport for London acquires Tube Lines' bonds
Victoria Tube station escalator work completed three months early
Real-time bus information now available anytime and anywhere
Greenwich Pier gets roof and lighting in time for London 2012 Games
Final Jubilee line upgrade cost vindicates decision to end PPP says TfL
Half a million London employees now signed up for 2012 travel advice, TfL tells Assembly and borough leaders
Mayor secures Emirates Airline as private sponsor for pioneering new Thames crossing
Two thirds of bendy buses converted and major savings being made
150 million year old stone for new Green Park Tube station
London Overground upgrade named project of the year at Rail Awards
Guide dogs to be allowed to use moving escalators for the first time ever
250 London schools take part in London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic torch walking relay
September
Following a meeting at Acas today London Underground (LU) has received confirmation from the trade unions that they will be recommending acceptance of LU's four-year pay settlement
Safer Travel at Night: TfL warns of dangers of unbooked minicabs as new students arrive in London
Almost eighty per cent of passengers in favour of proposed changes. Removal of weekday Kensington (Olympia) service will allow five additional trains on Wimbledon branch during morning peak. New timetable will be introduced in December 2011.
Green wall for Edgware Road Tube station to trap harmful pollution
Operators urged to take action now to meet tougher London Low Emission Zone standards to improve air quality, or risk fines
Chart toppers Rizzle Kicks team up with TfL to help reduce teenage road casualties in London
New Docklands Light Railway extension an instant hit with passengers
New London 2012 Games travel 'hotspot' info to help businesses plan ahead and avoid transport disruption
Tour of Britain, the UK's biggest professional cycle race, returns to the Capital
Mayor confirms fares increase for 2012 to support unprecedented £12bn investment in London's transport network
LU reaches agreement with drivers' unions over Olympics and Paralympics working arrangements
Latest figures confirm trend of long-term improvements in Tube performance
New bus routes to serve Stratford and surrounding area
New online postcode data released by Transport for London (TfL) at the inaugural 2012 Freight Forum meeting will help firms plan and manage deliveries during Games-time
2011 Great River Race occurs
Mayor announces Olympic Park electric charging network, creating air quality legacy
North Acton station wins Underground in bloom gardening competition.
Businesses urged to plan for paralympics too.
Mayor of London and Transport for London act to save 812 PlusBus route
Transformation of Green Park station nears completion
Transport for London secures further improvements to coach parking
No more bendy buses on route 73
New Oyster system to help customers pay the correct fare
There are currently 2,804 project pages; all have been assessed for quality and importance. If you see a new article on a project topic which is not rated, please add the banner to the talk page and assess it.
Discussions within the project were the categories for renaming, creating Cromwell Curve and the notability of Bateaux London.
Other project related discussions included train and station identification, the Crystal Palace to Beckenham Junction Line, renaming categories, Greater Anglia, the Harrington Hump, bus stations and road bridges on route diagrams.
TfL-funded police officers continue to reduce Blackwall Tunnel delays for drivers
Mayor of London helps 71 schools get pupils cycling
Mayor announces innovative bus technology set to deliver cleaner air across London
Olympic Taxi fare increase rejected by TfL
TfL reveals design for transformed Euston Circus junction
January
Tube performance on track for a successful Games
Major campaign launched to help people 'Get Ahead of the Games' and keep London and the UK moving in 2012
DLR launches a new three-car route and enhanced timetable to meet Games-time demand
Changes to travel around Paddington Station due to Crossrail works
Avoiding congestion made easier with new Transport for London live traffic news
London Overground passenger satisfaction soars following investment in capacity, trains and stations
Mayor welcomes green light for scheme to charge companies for disruptive roadworks
Mayor welcomes 200th greener, cleaner hybrid bus to London's fleet
New docking station for cycle hire in the heart of Westminster gets planning permission
Pedestrian Countdown technology to be rolled out across London from summer 2012
One in five people bought cycle equipment as a result of Barclays Cycle Hire
New cleaning contract of bus stations and stands to reduce CO2 emissions and cleaner air
Hammersmith flyover reopens to cars and light traffic as repairs continue
Free London 2012 support package for freight operators and their customers
Cycle safety improvements proposed around Bow
All drivers are urged to switch off their engines when parked, loading or waiting at the roadside
More reliable Tube carries record-breaking numbers
Mayor hails new measures in 2012 to deliver cleaner air for London
December
Hammersmith Flyover closed due to structural defect found
Edgware Road signal improvements delivered early, paving way for longer, accessible, air-con trains
Mayor announces trial to cut harmful pollution at industrial and construction sites across London
Interim operator for Putney to Blackfriars River Bus service
TfL has today announced details of a strategic review of traffic movements through the Kings Cross area
Motorcycles to be allowed permanent access to bus lanes
Around 85 of London's 700 bus routes will be changed in some way during the 2012 Games
TfL ramps up safety efforts on London Tramlink
Major crackdown on dangerous pedicabs in central London
Emirates Air Line lands on iconic Tube map as first tower completed
Mayor heralds the arrival of the new bus for London
More local transport improvements for London Boroughs announced by Mayor
Mayor and DfT announce £10 million to cut pollution from Capital's bus fleet
Mayor hails successful bid to make more London Overground stations step free
Vibrant London life captured in Yayoi Kusama's new artwork for the Pocket Tube Map
Additional peak trains for the 200,000 Wimbledon branch passengers each day will bring fewer delays and extra capacity
Overall Transport for London (TfL) fares to rise by 5.6 per cent in 2012
Lewis Hamilton toasts free travel on London transport to welcome in the New Year
Out-of-hours deliveries during London 2012 Games are viable, trials show
Real time digital bus information proves a hit with Londoners
As part of Transport for London's (TfL) commitment to the mental and physical health of its 27,000 employees, the organisation has signed the Time to Change Pledge
There are currently 2,820 project pages; all have been assessed for quality and importance. If you see a new article on a project topic which is not rated, please add the banner to the talk page and assess it.
I just hope this year round I can make the newsletters roughly within the first week of every month. If you ever feel you want to have a try, please feel free to drop me a line on my talk page.
My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community HERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.
So a few things about the interviews:
Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.
Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your name HERE instead.
If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.
Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.
London's utility bosses agree action plan for less disruptive roadworks
Tube set to post most reliable performance figures for a decade
Spiderweb reduces theft on London transport by 14 per cent
February
Contractors shortlisted to save tens of millions of pounds through new joint highway works
Read it and bin it, newspapers can cause Tube delays
Crime continues to fall on London's bus network
First passengers jump aboard the new bus for London
Mayor brings London's rail industry together to get set for the London 2012 Games
Freight operators and their customers urged to prepare for London 2012 Games with launch of new campaign
Crystal Palace improvement work to begin
New online process announced for London Service Permits
Mayor steps up HGV safety campaign to benefit cyclists and pedestrians
New card to make travel easier for people with hidden disabilities
Art on the Underground launches Canary Wharf Screen at Tube station
Cycling grants to help communities ride to the 2012 Games
Blackfriars Underground station reopens to cater for influx of passengers
Work begins to cool the platforms at two major central London stations
War on fare dodgers increases as penalty charges go up this weekend
Less than one month to go until Barclays Cycle Hire goes east
Changes to travel around Paddington Station due to Crossrail works
Incident response on the Tube to be boosted under 'Blue Light' trial
London Tramlink upgrade continues
TfL confirms priority junctions for cycle safety review
Project News
Articles
Baker Street and Waterloo Railway is on track to be Today's Featured Article on the Main Page on 10th March, the 106th anniversary of the line's opening
Hello, I hope you don't mind me contacting you in person. I thought you might be able to help as you are already familiar with at least part of the problem. I am quite hurt and shocked at the accusations made against me by Machine Elf 1735 on the tai chi RfD, which he continued in much greater length on Talk:T'ai chi ch'uan. I think they have now reached the point of being personal attacks: his last post on the RfD asserted that it is "perfectly obvious" that I am lying, gaming the system, 'hollering', circumventing discussion and generally acting in very bad faith.
This is only my second RfD and I tried very hard to get everything right, including discussing the issue in depth before filing it (with someone who, despite Machine Elf's assertions, mostly agreed with me and certainly did not oppose me). I don't understand what, if anything, I actually did wrong, and I don't know whether I should be defending myself against these accusations that he's making about me. Everyone else involved has been entirely helpful and cooperative but he really seems sure that I'm doing something very bad. I feel thoroughly bitten and certainly having serious doubts about participating on the administrative side of Wikipedia again. I don't like having his attacks up there unopposed, possibly making them look like legit complaints to any passing Wikipedian and putting them off contributing to the RfD, but I don't want to escalate the situation by having an argument about conduct and civility on an RfD. I would like to respond to what he's said about the redirects themselves (which is actually on-topic) but I am sure he will bite me again if I try, as he has not responded well to calm discussion thus far.
My question is what should I do about this? This is the most serious hostility I've faced on my short time on Wikipedia, by a long way. Since you are in a small way involved, does that make you the right admin for me to ask for help, or the wrong one? I hoped that by contacting you, I would not be further accused of forum shopping (you have already contributed to the RfD). I also have a mentor but he's very busy at the mo. If you can't help directly, should I take it to Wikiquette assistance, or somewhere else? I just want the false accusations to stop, and if I have genuinely done anything wrong, I want to know what it is. Thank you for your time. ~Kimelea(talk)19:35, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Within the project, discussions included how two project articles appeared on TFA in quick succession and an RfC on inclusion of particular viewpoint on future lengthening of certain trainsets on British Rail Class 458
Within other related projects, a relevant discussion included was on canal bridges
Requests
If you want to post a request for help with an article, finding a photograph or seeking reference material, contact the editor
Hello Thryduulf. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released.
Please click HERE to participate.
Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts.
I was wondering why you closed the RFDs for Template:Anchor for Redirect and Michel Aoun#Archive1 as keep? I don't think any arguments made in either debate had any recourse to policy, so, given that each had one "delete" and one "keep" apiece, I think both are fairly clear cases of "no consensus". I might be missing something though. Either way, it's obviously not a remotely big deal. Keep up the good work! – hysteria18 (talk) 01:55, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
I'm surprised by this close. There were two !votes to delete, just one keep !voter. The redirects were just nonfunctional clutter, completely implausible as search terms and all pointing to the same article. Could you please explain or reconsider the close? Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:06, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
Quoting policy/guidelines doesn't demonstrate that policy/guidelines are being applied correctly. Creating redirects from "articles" that don't exist, have never existed, and have no reasonable likelihood of ever existing, with titles that are nowhere near plausible search terms is simply inappropriate clutter. All three redirects pointed to the same article, and no reason was given to explain why we needed four separate "see also" links, with four inexplicably different titles, to the same target. One link in the "see also" section would have been sufficient and consistent with practice in other articles; just using section links rather than fake-title redirects would have been more than sufficient. An unexplained and implausible "it's useful" from the creator really isn't really anything but an "I like it" response; this is really a matter of editing discretion, where there's no good reason to reject the expressed consensus. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:03, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Good evening, Thryduulf. You closed the RfD on Keven Veilleux earlier today as "delete" but then never deleted the redirect. You also relisted Scott Wilson (ice hockey), a case that looked identical to me. I suspect maybe an edit got overwritten? I'll help clean up if you tell me what you wanted done. Rossami(talk)22:27, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
I meant to delete Keven Veilleux, but I'm having very significant connection issues at present so I guess it never took. I relisted Scott Wilson due to the AfD issues, but if you feel that I should have been consistent then please feel free to go ahead and make them consistent in whichever direction you think best. Cheers. Thryduulf (talk) 13:30, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
I don't feel all that strongly one way or the other. And I'm perhaps more comfortable than most with the idea that Wikipedia is inconsistent. You've already closed it as Delete. I'll abide by that decision. Since I seem to be having better luck with connections today, I'll carry out the delete for you. Thanks. Rossami(talk)14:31, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Emergency gas works cause temporary diversion of route 50
From Tuesday 8 May some long term, but temporary, changes will be made to local traffic arrangements in the North Woolwich area to enable Crossrail works to take place, some lasting 18 months
April
TfL's High Court injunction prevents Addison Lee from instructing its drivers to use bus lanes
Shortlisted bidders for the Bank Station Capacity Upgrade project announced
Londoners urged to plan ahead for Games-time travel as full and final Tube and rail 'hotspot' data released
Private hire vehicle drivers could be liable to personal criminal prosecution if they break traffic regulations, including by driving in bus lanes
New strengthening cables installed within Hammersmith Flyover
New entrance to West Croydon station provides better access for all
All the world's poets on the Tube
Major resurfacing works to take place along Victoria Embankment across Easter Bank Holiday weekend
Temporary changes to bus services during London 2012 Games test event in Woolwich.
Capital's rogue limousines targeted
Out-of-hours deliveries to be encouraged during London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games
MUMS-to-be travelling by Tube can get a baby on board badge so passengers know they may need to sit down
Within the project, discussions included how two project articles appeared on TFA in quick succession, a RfC on inclusion of particular viewpoint on future lengthening of certain trainsets on British Rail Class 458 and assessment of London Underground's electric locomotives
Within other related projects, a relevant discussion included was on canal bridges and speeds of trains and rail routes
Requests
If you want to post a request for help with an article, finding a photograph or seeking reference material, contact the editor
Thank you for your advice. That's a very annoying user, for four years he's been creating an article about himself. I had him blocked because he used sock puppets, and I tried to block him again but an administrator told me that was ancient history. Maybe he's right, but he keeps creating that page with slight name changes, although he doesn't use sock puppets anymore. I'll keep an eye on him and do as you say. I'm almost sure he will create that page again. PeterCantropus (talk) 14:22, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi Thryduulf, Peter and all. That editor was right in that it's ancient history. Don't worry, I don't think of creating the article again. Also, I wanted to report PeterCanthropus on a personal attack on me. On my talk page, he called me boludo (roughly Spanish for asshole), where can I do that? Greetings to you all. --Againme (talk) 15:24, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
I'd appreciate your reply on the RfD on Uniform motion. I contacted Tideflat (the nominator) a few days ago, but never received any response. Thank you! 786b6364 (talk) 12:15, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
I've had a quick look but I'm too tired to fully understand it at the moment, so I'm not going to comment now. I'll try and get to it when I'm next online (which may not be for a week or so). Thryduulf (talk) 19:50, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Thryduulf. Since you took part in an RfC at the talk page for our indentation essay, I wonder whether you might care to comment here, as well. No additional blocks are being sought, but a broader consensus on the indentation issue would be welcome. Best, --OhioStandard (talk)01:18, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
First stations named for London Underground WiFi launch
May
Transport for London welcomes RMT acceptance of Olympics recognition proposals
Crime on London's transport network at eight year low
London 2012 Games first: TfL officials to provide live travel advice to businesses on Twitter
London Underground showcases proposals to boost Bank's capacity
TfL launches London 2012 Games 'Temporary Road Changes' planning tool and urges road users to plan ahead
Daily weekday River Bus services to treble between Putney and Blackfriars
Staff recognised at Dial-a-Ride Awards 2012
Medically trained BTP officers deployed on the Tube
New Oyster online accounts help customers keep track of their travel
Olympic legends compete to be the fastest to cross London
Tracey Emin unveils personal version of the Tube Map
Wembley Central becomes the 65th step-free Tube station
Vital investment and reliability programme result in record year of Tube performance
Emirates Air Line flying high as all 34 cabins undergo rigorous safety testing
Hammersmith Flyover to fully reopen to traffic on 30 May
TfL issues travel advice to enable London to celebrate The Queen's Diamond Jubilee
Buses diversions in Bromley town centre for Diamond Jubilee celebrations
Transport for London (TfL) and Network Rail are encouraging those travelling during Games-time to make short journeys on foot as Living Streets' Walk to Work Week launches
Who is Community? - a new artwork by Bob and Roberta Smith and Tim Newton running from 15 May 2012 through 2013 on display at Stratford station
Transport for London (TfL), the Association of Train Operating Companies (ATOC) and Cubic Transportation Systems have picked up top honours at the 2012 International Transport Forum for their joint work on introducing Oyster onto the National Rail network in London
Emergency gas works cause temporary diversion of route 50
From Tuesday 8 May some long term, but temporary, changes will be made to local traffic arrangements in the North Woolwich area to enable Crossrail works to take place, some lasting 18 months
Within the project, discussions included how two project articles appeared on TFA in quick succession, a RfC on inclusion of particular viewpoint on future lengthening of certain trainsets on British Rail Class 458 and assessment of London Underground's electric locomotives
Within other related projects, relevant discussions included were on the expansion and promotion of Herne Hill railway station, the existence of the Sutton Loop, Midland Main Line vs Gret Central Main Line and WikiProject London in Signpost
Requests
If you want to post a request for help with an article, finding a photograph or seeking reference material, contact the editor
Within the project, discussions included how two project articles appeared on TFA in quick succession, a RfC on inclusion of particular viewpoint on future lengthening of certain trainsets on British Rail Class 458,assessment of London Underground's electric locomotives and the Hammersmith & City line navbox
Within other related projects, relevant discussions included were on major railway stations in Britain, a new London train wiki and the notability of railway magazines
Requests
If you want to post a request for help with an article, finding a photograph or seeking reference material, contact the editor
hi,just thought to let you know that the IBAN between Darkness shines and TopGun had been removed after the Discussion at ANI, I dont have the link at the moment, If you want you can dig it. cheers--DBigXray18:26, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Socially Liberal
A quick thank you for your efforts with the socially liberal page. I kind of started the debate, but wasn't able to follow it to the conclusion (my occupation means I can't rely on a good internet connection) - your solution was a good and pragmatic one. DistractionActivity (talk) 18:43, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Dispute Resolution IRC office hours.
Hello there. As you expressed interest in hearing updates to my research in the dispute resolution survey that was done a few months ago, I just wanted to let you know that I am hosting an IRC office hours session this coming Saturday, 28th July at 19:00 UTC (approximately 12 hours from now). This will be located in the #wikimedia-officeconnect IRC channel - if you have not participated in an IRC discussion before you can connect to IRC here.
Hey Thryduulf, I'm curious why you closed the other two bad RfDs (for already-deleted redirects) but not this one: Wikipedia:IWONTHEARYOU. From what I can tell, the closure of the original discussion occurred shortly after this nomination. I can't tell whether the redirect was nominated improperly (perhaps the original nom didn't tag it?), but the way it looks to me, that other one shouldn't be left open either. However I'm not certain enough to just close it. I'm not questioning your judgment, mind; you're usually rather wise regarding RfD, so I'm curious what your reasoning was. BigNate37(T)04:44, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Nevermind, you'll see them eventually now that they're on RfD. (By the way, I mistakenly used my wikt browser search to get here, and I was so confused staring at wikt:User:Thryduulf, puzzling over what had happened.) BigNate37(T)05:49, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
Within the project, discussions included the Hammersmith & City line navbox, the deletion of Template:London Underground Tube Stations & Rolling Stock and links to London Underground usage data figures not working
Within other related projects, relevant discussions included were on the Olympics, notability of railway magzines, various railway templates, waterways become active routes on Google Maps, bus station categories and notability of a bus type and a bus builder.
Requests
If you want to post a request for help with an article, finding a photograph or seeking reference material, contact the editor
National Rail
Done - restored and userfied to User:Anarchangel/List of musicians who died before the age of 60. When you're done with it, please mark it for deletion and an admin will be along to tidy up shortly. Thryduulf (talk) 23:59, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Template:CompactTOCrefs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 16:44, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
.png)
.jpg)
Hello. You have a new message at Wikipedia:Requested templates's talk page. — BigNate37(T) 21:30, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
,_Showbus_2009.jpg)
