User talk:Thats Just Great

Nomination of Steve Lee (artist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steve Lee (artist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Lee (artist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 2Joules (talk) 08:18, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Surviving American units with the highest percentage of casualties per conflict) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Surviving American units with the highest percentage of casualties per conflict, Thats Just Great!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

When you copy text from another Wikipedia article, as you have here, you should provide attribution in your edit summary.

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:27, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

September 2018

Hello, I'm Toddst1. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Bobby Lee, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. See WP:IMDBREF. Toddst1 (talk) 03:56, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Thats Just Great. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Steve Lee (artist), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 04:00, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Bobby Lee. Content of this nature could be regarded as personal information and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. See WP:IMDBREF. Toddst1 (talk) 01:30, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

On re-posting

Hi, Thats Just Great. It's not common practice on Wikipedia to re-post a post somebody has left on your page, on to their own page. Please instead either answer below it on your own page, or answer on the other person's page, but without re-posting. That way we can avoid confusing people as well as bloating up pages. Also, Toddst1 has indicated that he doesn't want your repost on his page, by removing it, at least twice. Then you definitely don't get to keep restoring it. Edit warring to restore your posts on another user's page after they have removed them, is a quite serious kind of edit warring, as well as being rude. Please stop. (Note: please don't re-post this post on to my page.) Bishonen | talk 15:32, 16 September 2018 (UTC).

DYK nomination of St. Lawrence Island famine

Hello! Your submission of St. Lawrence Island famine at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Kingsif (talk) 00:03, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 17:15, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

DYK for St. Lawrence Island famine

On 24 December 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article St. Lawrence Island famine, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that reindeer (pictured) were introduced to St. Lawrence Island to prevent starvation following the famine of 1878–1880, which killed more than 1,000 people? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/St. Lawrence Island famine. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, St. Lawrence Island famine), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 12:01, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles Cooper Nott Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Cooper Nott (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:31, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

book template style

Please use [1] style format when adding books to article ref sections for citations; also, needs to be done in this way to properly work/link with the sfn page cite format. You may want to add this to your "cheat sheet". Thanks, Kierzek (talk) 22:46, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Erhard Auer

Hello, Thats Just Great,

Thanks for creating Erhard Auer! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

This has been tagged for one issue.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 18:49, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (1919 Norfolk race riot) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 1919 Norfolk race riot.

User:Ifnord while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Interesting article. Thank-you.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Ifnord}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Ifnord (talk) 18:12, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Red Summer into Washington race riot of 1919. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:56, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Kimball, West Virginia

Regarding your edit to Kimball, West Virginia, please take a moment to read Help:Referencing for beginners. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:27, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Good work, keep it up QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 15:12, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Lusk Committee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to New York

Red Summer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to New York

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:10, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your edits.

I appreciate the work you have done at Berry Washington and elsewhere. Thanks!

DYK nomination of Royce Coleman Dyer

Hello! Your submission of Royce Coleman Dyer at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! GRuban (talk) 18:06, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Walter Anderson (pilot)

Hello! Your submission of Walter Anderson (pilot) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 01:13, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

DYK for SS Grampian

On 17 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SS Grampian, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the captain of the SS Grampian intentionally rammed an iceberg head-on so as to avoid the Titanic's fate? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, SS Grampian), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

valereee (talk) 00:02, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Newcover?

Hi. In this edit, you added a "Newcover Award". Now, that could be the name of an award, but I strongly suspect that it should be "Newcomer Award". Would you please check? I would do it myself if I had access to the source. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 08:08, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

I see that you switched it to "Newcomer". Thanks for taking care of it. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 17:39, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Walter Anderson (pilot)

On 19 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Walter Anderson (pilot), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that pilot Walter Anderson and observer John Mitchell were hit by communist fire but landed, rescued two pilots, and took off with Mitchell on the wing and his fingers plugging their leaking tank? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Walter Anderson (pilot). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Walter Anderson (pilot)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

DYK for 1919 Norfolk race riot

On 20 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1919 Norfolk race riot, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1919 a race riot broke out in Norfolk, Virginia, during a homecoming celebration for African-American veterans of World War I? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1919 Norfolk race riot. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 1919 Norfolk race riot), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:03, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Royce Coleman Dyer

On 23 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Royce Coleman Dyer, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after their beloved Canadian leader, Captain Dyer, died, his Slavo-British unit took to carrying a massive portrait of him and would later murder all of the unit's other officers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Royce Coleman Dyer. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Royce Coleman Dyer), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Lynching of Jay Lynch

On 20 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lynching of Jay Lynch, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the death penalty in Missouri was restored in large part due to the lynching of Jay Lynch? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lynching of Jay Lynch. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Lynching of Jay Lynch), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Proposed renaming of category "1919 disasters in the Canada"

Please see my proposal to speedily rename the category Category:1919 disasters in the Canada to Category:1919 disasters in Canada Hugo999 (talk) 22:50, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Thats Just Great

Thank you for creating Joan of Arc (New York).

User:Utopes, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hey there! I wanted to ask, but why is this statue notable?

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Utopes}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Utopes (talk) 21:49, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

day-of-year articles

Hi, just an fyi, all new entries to day-of-year list articles require an inline citation with the entry. Hopefully there should be a source in the target article you can use. Thanks! Schazjmd (talk) 22:04, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of killings by law enforcement officers in Germany, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reichstag (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Vandalism allegations

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Treaty of Neuilly-sur-Seine. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- User talk:Kostja 08:12, 17 April 2020‎

Some baklava for you!

Thanks for creating Zeppelin LZ 55. Happy editing! Mccapra (talk) 13:08, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Zeppelin LZ 78

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Zeppelin LZ 78 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NASCARfan0548 ↗ 22:41, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Zeppelin LZ 78

Sorry about marking this page as copyvio, I won't do it again. NASCARfan0548 ↗ 23:05, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Thats Just Great

Thank you for creating Colonial police action against the people of Haida Gwaii.

User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Needs a history section introduced and expanded and the lede needs work.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creep^Talk 23:29, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Colonial police action against the people of Haida Gwaii, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Haida (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve Fritz Gareis

Hello, Thats Just Great,

Thank you for creating Fritz Gareis.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This has been tagged for two issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 07:41, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

"Paul Guinan" moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, "Paul Guinan", does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:48, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Lynching of Irving and Herman Arthur

I would like to re-organize the "Bibliography" section because there seems to be a lot written specifically on this event – historically and, now ... still developing. To that end, I think that the Note/References style, as this article builds, might be cumbersome. I think that a system of direct inline citations – skipping the "Notes" section, and, instead, using "Notes" to explain some things. I am mindful that, for many, this article is very personal, and even after 100 years, can be hurtful. I am not personally attached to it, but tripped over it while building an article. In any event, I don't want to jumble the nice work you did. This article requires special care. Thoughts? – Eurodog (talk) 14:14, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

You've done great work on the article BTW. Wikipedia has an annotation function. Would that work? I put in an example in the article (feel free to erase/alter/change) but basically you just put whatever note you want into this wikicode: {{#tag:ref|ENTER YOUR NOTE HERE|group="A"}} -- Thats Just Great (talk) 15:26, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Little help-question: On the article, Miron Sher, I can't get Note #5 to link. What am I doing wrong? – Eurodog (talk) 19:58, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

In the Arthur article, would you consider using hang indents in the reference section (that is, if it is an accepted style)? See example at Miron Sher. – Eurodog (talk) 13:06, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

• I know that is the academic style but I'm not sure it is the Wikipedia style. But don't make any changes until September 4th. The article goes live on the main page then. @Eurodog:-- Thats Just Great (talk) 15:12, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Good work. Topic is painful beyond imagination. There's another chapter worth telling (Sandbox notes: Citizens armed up afterward), but holding. – Eurodog (talk) 13:36, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

You should add it in. It's been posted on the front page so you can make changes. @Eurodog: -- Thats Just Great (talk) 16:23, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Re: Lynching of George Hughes → The June 3, 2021, WaPo blog by Trent might interest you → Trent, Sydney (June 3, 2021). "Sherman Riot: In Texas, a Struggle to Memorialize a Brutal Lynching as Resistance Grows to Teaching Historical Racism – The Battle to Approve a Historical Marker in Sherman Comes Amid the State's Efforts to Limit the Teaching of Racism in Schools". The Washington Post (Retropolis – the history blog of the Washington Post). Retrieved June 4, 2021. ISSN 2641-9599 (publication); ProQuest 2536670723 (U.S. Newsstream database) (article). – Eurodog (talk) 13:19, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Lynching of Irving and Herman Arthur

Hello! Your submission of Lynching of Irving and Herman Arthur at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! CMD (talk) 04:43, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Congrats to you – It's your article! – Eurodog (talk) 13:40, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Lynching of Irving and Herman Arthur

On 1 September 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lynching of Irving and Herman Arthur, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that almost a century after African-American brothers Irving and Herman Arthur were burnt alive at a fairground in Paris, Texas, their names were listed on a lynching memorial? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lynching of Irving and Herman Arthur. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Lynching of Irving and Herman Arthur), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

January 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - wolf 02:44, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of lynching victims in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Frédéric de Haenen moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Frédéric de Haenen, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:48, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Category:Recipients of the Médaille militaire (France) has been nominated for renaming

Category:Recipients of the Médaille militaire (France) has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:17, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Frédéric de Haenen

Hello, Thats Just Great. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Frédéric de Haenen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:03, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lynchings in Elmore County, Alabama, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elmore County.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Thats Just Great

Thank you for creating Japanese destroyer Sendan.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the redirect!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:17, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Martin K. A. Morgan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Martin K. A. Morgan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin K. A. Morgan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

(t · c) buidhe 03:06, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Thats Just Great. Thank you for your work on William Frederick Nelson Sharpe. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thanks for creating the article. I encourage you to write more! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:00, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Category:July 1919 crimes has been nominated for deletion

Category:July 1919 crimes has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 20:39, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Category:1919 crimes by month has been nominated for deletion

Category:1919 crimes by month has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 20:39, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Article on lynching

I recently used an article you created, Lynching of William Baker as a starting point for an article Lynching of Keith Bowen. I don't feel that I did a very good job. If you have time and interest, could you take a look at the article and consider improving it? Thanks! — Jacona (talk) 16:22, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:World War I tanks of United Kingdom

A tag has been placed on Category:World War I tanks of United Kingdom indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:23, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Rewriting of Hurtsboro race riot

Hi That's Just Great,

Thank you for your work on the Hurtsboro Race Riot. I just posted some new sections that give a fuller picture of what happened. There was a potential for a race riot -- a combination of rumor and newspaper stories riled people up, and 100 to 150 men assembled in Hurtsboro bearing guns -- but the sheriff sent the men home. By then the two Black men were in jail. It seems the sheriff and subsequent newspapers stories were able to defuse the situation.

~~~~ Mrsedashwoodferrars (talk) 13:13, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hurtsboro race riot

The article Hurtsboro race riot has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This event was not a riot, but a minor shoot-out.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:January 1920 events in Germany

A tag has been placed on Category:January 1920 events in Germany indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:19, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Thats Just Great. Thank you for your work on SMS Triumph. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:58, 2 September 2024 (UTC)