User talk:Sulav K Shetri

Welcome, Sulav K Shetri!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Sulav K Shetri! I'm I dream of horses, and I've been assigned as your mentor. Around 10% of new Wikipedia accounts receive a mentor randomly taken from a list of volunteers. It just means I'm here to help with anything you need! We need to have all kinds of people working together to create an online encyclopedia, so I'm glad you're here. Over time, you will figure out what you enjoy doing the most on Wikipedia.

You might have noticed that you have access to a tutorial and suggested edits. It's recommended that you take advantage of this, as it'll make learning how to edit Wikipedia easier.

If you need assistance with anything or have any questions, click on the "Get editing help" button on the bottom right corner of your screen. This will open up a module with links to help pages and a place to ask me questions. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or go here to get help from the wider community.

Again, welcome to Wikipedia! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 05:38, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sulav K Shetri

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Sulav K Shetri requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Lemonaka (talk) 14:57, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't edit other users' talk page headers

Please don't do this again. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:39, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pankaj Bikram Nebmang

The article Pankaj Bikram Nebmang has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 02:56, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bodh Raj Poudel moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bodh Raj Poudel, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, click the Submit the draft for review! button atop the article. Silikonz💬 04:44, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sulav K Shetri

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Sulav K Shetri requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Uhai (talk) 21:20, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing, wrong information

Having seen your recent edits to several pages, you clearly seem to have no hold of standards of Wikipedia. Kindly recheck the notability standards before updating something, otherwise your account may proceed to deletion. Wiki Master World (talk) 06:45, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pankaj Bikram Nebmang moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pankaj Bikram Nebmang, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:55, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sulav K Shetri

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Sulav K Shetri requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -Lemonaka‎ 09:52, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello, I'm Lemonaka. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! -Lemonaka‎ 15:21, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You @Lemonaka For Your Suggestions I am new here so I dont so much how to use sandbox. Sulav K Shetri (talk) 01:36, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to 2023 Nepalese presidential election—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 10:00, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you. Sulav K Shetri (talk) 01:37, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2023 Nepalese presidential election, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Nagol0929 (talk) 13:49, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sulav K Shetri! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Basanta Bahadur Kunwar that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. When you add content that more than doubles the size of the article, that clearly isn't a minor edit! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:05, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prabhu Ram Sharma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chief of Army Staff. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Basanta Bahadur Kunwar (March 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Basanta Bahadur Kunwar instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Basanta Bahadur Kunwar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:58, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sulav K Shetri! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:58, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Basanta Bahadur Kunwar has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Basanta Bahadur Kunwar. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:07, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your sandbox

Please note that the creation of hoax articles on Wikipedia is liable to result in an indefinite block. I suggest you delete it immediately, and find something better to do with your time. AndyTheGrump (talk) 14:40, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello this is my sandbox so I can do anything I am doing thing in my snadbox not yours so please sut your mouth. Sulav K Shetri (talk) 05:17, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, it is not 'your sandbox'. It is a page within English-language Wikipedia namespace, on a website provided by the Wikimedia Foundation, and thus subject to both both the WMF terms of use and to Wikipedia:User pages guidelines which lay down limits as to what you can and cannot use such pages for. user pages which give the appearance of being articles are expressly forbidden. AndyTheGrump (talk) 05:39, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sulav K Shetri/sandbox

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Sulav K Shetri/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:30, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sulav K Shetri/sandbox

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Sulav K Shetri/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:28, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sharat Singh Bhandari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ministry of Labour, Employment and Social Security.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ganga Kc

The article Ganga Kc has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP Fails GNG, BIO, NPOL. Local pol, no IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. // Timothy :: talk 06:29, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sulav K Shetri/sandbox

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Sulav K Shetri/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:20, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you realise

...that you're just attracting more and more of the wrong sort of attention? Please, do yourself a favour and stop creating nonsensical content, even in your sandbox, as nothing good will come of that. Trust me on this. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:22, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So, Where can I write anything that I want. Sulav K Shetri (talk) 10:09, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are any number of blogging, social media, and free webhosting sites out there. Take your pick. Wikipedia is none of those things; it is an encyclopaedia. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:15, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Badi bolxas machickni morlas feri hos gar fucche. Sulav K Shetri (talk) 07:36, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing how can I apply Sulav K Shetri (talk) 10:27, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How can you "apply" what? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:00, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing Judging by the question on my talk page, they want to "apply" for extended confirmation. I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 14:25, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@I dream of horses: oh okay, thanks. As it happens, I'm approx. one nanometre away from going in a whole different direction with this, so I'm probably not the best person to ask. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:30, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New message from I dream of horses

Hello, Sulav K Shetri. You have new messages at I dream of horses's talk page.
Message added 14:24, 4 April 2023 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 14:24, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:47, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jimfbleak plaese give me last chance from now i will not do disruptive edits. Sulav K Shetri (talk) 01:32, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jimfbleak please unblock me give a last chance plaese. Sulav K Shetri (talk) 01:32, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

@Jimfbleak

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sulav K Shetri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I should be Unblocked beacuse My behavior has changed: I was blocked for disruptive behavior, I am requesting an unblock after a period of time has passed and I have demonstrated that I am willing to follow Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sulav K Shetri (talk) 04:15, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please tell us in a new request what was disruptive about your behavior, what you will do differently in the future, and tell the constructive contributions that you wish to make. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:09, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I will leave it to others to consider your block, but I will remove the nowiki that is preventing your request above from working Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:34, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jimfbleak who others who should I tell you unblock me Sulav K Shetri (talk) 05:37, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The box above will automatically alert admins who patrol unblock requests, you don't need to do anything else Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:49, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jimfbleak Ok so I don't have to do anything so how I will be unblocked now. Sulav K Shetri (talk) 06:01, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) How many times were your userpage and sandbox deleted, only for you to post the same nonsense there again? How many times were you warned, and advised against such behaviour? You were given plenty of opportunities, to no avail. All this goes back weeks and months... but now you've suddenly come to your senses, really? Obviously admins will decide on your request, and I'm not one, but for the record and FWIW, I object. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:18, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

@Sulav K Shetri

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sulav K Shetri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have made edits that are unintentionally or mistakenly in violation of Wikipedia's policies, and they wish to clarify the situation and request to be unblocked. I have demonstrated a commitment to following Wikipedia's policies and guidelines and wish to request to be unblocked so that they can continue contributing. From Now I will only do creative edits like: Fixing grammatical or spelling errors in existing articles. Adding reliable sources to existing articles to improve their accuracy and verifiability. Rewriting sections of an article to improve its readability and flow. Adding relevant and well-sourced information to an article that is currently incomplete. Adding new articles on notable topics that are currently missing from Wikipedia. Participating in discussions on talk pages or on user talk pages in a respectful and constructive manner.

Decline reason:

There was nothing unintentional about your prior violation of Wikipedia's policies. This was clearly deliberate. You were warned over and over and over again and continued your inappropriate behaviour. It's not even clear to me that you even understand now. You have demonstrated a commitment to ignoring Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, not to following them. Yamla (talk) 10:11, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request

To @Jimfbleak

I humbly request to be unblocked on Wikipedia as I genuinely value and respect the principles and guidelines upheld by the community. While I understand that my actions or behavior may have led to the block, I assure you that I have learned from the experience and will make every effort to adhere to Wikipedia's policies moving forward.

I apologize for any disruption or violation I may have caused. I acknowledge the importance of maintaining a collaborative and respectful environment on Wikipedia, and I am committed to upholding these standards. I assure you that I will not repeat the actions that led to the block, and I am willing to engage in a constructive dialogue with other editors and administrators to resolve any outstanding concerns.

I am eager to contribute positively to Wikipedia and share my knowledge and expertise in a responsible manner. If granted the opportunity, I will work diligently to improve articles, follow the established guidelines, and contribute to the growth of this valuable resource.

Thank you for considering my appeal for unblocking. I am open to any further discussions or clarifications required and will take the necessary steps to rectify any mistakes I may have made.

Sincerely,

Sulav K Shetri (talk) 01:49, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can see, nothing you have done on Wikipedia demonstrates that you have 'expertise' in anything other than wasting peoples' time with nonsense. AndyTheGrump (talk) 02:19, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sulav K Shetri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I humbly request to be unblocked on Wikipedia as I genuinely value and respect the principles and guidelines upheld by the community. While I understand that my actions or behavior may have led to the block, I assure you that I have learned from the experience and will make every effort to adhere to Wikipedia's policies moving forward. I am eager to contribute positively to Wikipedia and share my knowledge and expertise in a responsible manner. If granted the opportunity, I will work diligently to improve articles, follow the established guidelines, and contribute to the growth of this valuable resource. Thank you for considering my appeal for unblocking. I am open to any further discussions or clarifications required and will take the necessary steps to rectify any mistakes I may have made.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. Using ChatGPT to generate your unblock request clearly demonstrates a profound lack of competence. This will count against you in any future unblock requests. Yamla (talk) 13:08, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sulav K Shetri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked by doing so many distributive edits on wikipedia and its been so long I have been blocked I have already appealed a unblock Request by ChatGPT thats my big mistake and now I have realize to follow all wikipedia policies it's been a months I have been appealing so please I think I should be given one last chance I can prove anyway that I will follow all wikipedia policies and community guildness.If you think I shouldn't be unblocked and so it's ok to me that this was my big mistake if you take decision not to unblock me it's ok I will kindly respect your decision. By doing Distributive Edits if it is a big crime it's ok.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 02:12, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sulav K Shetri (talk) 01:40, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Using ChatGPT to request an unblock? Ignoring clear and unambiguous instruction not to remove block review notices? [1] About time talk page access was removed entirely, in my opinion. A complete and utter time-waster. AndyTheGrump (talk) 02:21, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm removing talk page access. 331dot (talk) 06:30, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. Your ability to edit this talk page has also been revoked. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then appeal to the Unblock Ticket Request System. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:00, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]