User talk:SrpskiAnonimac

Welcome!

Hello, SrpskiAnonimac, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Götaland. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JesseRafe (talk) 15:34, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Undiscussed move(s)

I moved back an article to the name Klokot (you previously moved it to Klokot (settlement)). Such a move was not useful for two reasons: (a) there is nothing else titled "Klokot" in Wikipedia, so there is nothing to disambiguate, (b) even if there were an article about Bosnian Klokot, this one is clearly a WP:primary topic. Similar thing happened with your move of Vitina to Vitina (town), it was loved back by Amakuru. Please, do not make such moved in the future. Vanjagenije (talk) 13:57, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Undiscussed move(s) again

I see that you are again moving pages without any discussion and contrary to Wikipedia policies. You moved Kovačica to Kovačica (town) although the town is the clear WP:Primary topic and does not need any disambiguation. Please, move it back. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:04, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Romanov listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Romanov. Since you had some involvement with the Romanov redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. R'n'B (call me Russ) 15:48, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! R'n'B (call me Russ) 10:16, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop changing primary topic redirects

Please stop changing redirects like Romanov and Habsburg to point to disambiguation pages without discussion. These are well-established redirects in accordance with the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC guideline. If you think an individual redirect should be changed because it is not actually the primary topic, please use WP:RM to discuss the move. Technically, the correct solution in such a case is to propose to move the disambiguation page to the primary topic title. That is, you should propose to move Habsburg (disambiguation), not change the target of Habsburg. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 10:19, 6 May 2017 (UTC) '[reply]

Requesting a move in the future

Hello. In response to this message, I discussed Pontus with another person, who performed the move. If you like, you can try WP:RMTR, which takes your request on moves that do not require discussion. WP:RM#CM process can be used if a move requires or needs a discussion. --George Ho (talk) 09:56, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: KK Swisslion Takovo Lions Vrsac

Hello SrpskiAnonimac. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of KK Swisslion Takovo Lions Vrsac, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: not a reason for speedy deletion, use WP:RFD to delete. Thank you. —Kusma (t·c) 20:27, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Kusma: That are two different names for KK Radnički Kragujevac:

--SrpskiAnonimac (talk) 21:49, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That is a good argument for deletion via WP:RFD, but not sufficient for speedy deletion without discussion. —Kusma (t·c) 05:58, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RFD

Hi! I imagine that with this edit you could have been meaning to nominate a redirect for discussion. If that is indeed the case, you should follow the instruction at the top of WP:RFD. But please note that Aramaic (disambiguation) is not a redirect and hence RfD isn't the place for discussing it. Maybe it was instead a requested move that you had in mind? – Uanfala 23:19, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Superfluous hatnotes

I have again reverted the hatnotes you added to Mandarin Chinese and Standard Chinese. As outlined at Wikipedia:Hatnote, the purpose of a hatnote is to help a reader who has arrived at an article by mistake find the article they were searching for. No-one who searches for "Mandarin Chinese" or "Standard Chinese" would actually be looking for any of the other things listed at Mandarin (disambiguation) (see WP:NAMB). Kanguole 23:48, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Dragaš (disambiguation)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Dragaš (disambiguation), SrpskiAnonimac!

Wikipedia editor Anoptimistix just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for creating a disambiguation page. Happy editing

To reply, leave a comment on Anoptimistix's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Anoptimistix "Message Me" 15:04, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ancient Age

I'm not so sure I agree with your move of the Ancient Age article and redirecting that title to Ancient history. I rather doubt that people encounter "Ancient Age" (with capitalization of the word "Age") very often when they aren't talking about whiskey. —BarrelProof (talk) 19:36, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo municipalities

Hi. Please refrain from re-populating the infobox template of the selected Kosovo municipalities articles with native name in Serbian and Albanian language. Such information is already given in the lead section of the article, and it makes infoboxes less readable with duplication of content as it is in the case of North Mitrovica: [[1]].--AirWolf ^talk 22:42, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gana (nickname) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gana (nickname), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 03:42, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Međureč) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Međureč, SrpskiAnonimac!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please only add entries if they have an English article or meet MOS:DABRL or MOS:DABMENTION.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 11:27, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sevojno

Hi! I have noticed your recent edits on Sevojno's article. Please, do not remove or replace "urban municipality" settlement descriptions with "city municipality" or such. The correct form for (in Serbian) "gradska opština" is "urban municipality" and not the latter. I have made the same mistake a while ago when editing Belgrade's urban and suburban municipalities. Also, we should reflect the recent (2013) administrative changes, which made Sevojno one of the two urban municipalities of the city of Užice. If you have any questions, leave me a message on my talk page. Bye!--AirWolf ^talk 12:05, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Municipalities

It is not up to me to rename (move) these articles, but I have request administrator's action about it. Thanks for the notice.--AirWolf ^talk 16:08, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have requested administrator's action for these articles that we have discussed about. It should be done soon. As far as for capitalization of letters in "urban/suburban municipality", in my opinion there shouldn't be a capitalization, only if it happens to be the first letter in a sentence or a title. Bye.--AirWolf ^talk 15:42, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Instead, after some revision, we should stick to the city municipalities until some discussion about the proper translation of "gradska opština" (in Serbian) starts. For any suggestions, please write at my talk page.--AirWolf ^talk 20:28, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tatars

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Edit Summary example: links--Quisqualis (talk) 02:14, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tribes of Montenegro

I've just tried to correct an edit you made quite a while ago to language templates at Tribes of Montenegro, because the {{lang-sr}} template was complaining about italicized text in the parameter. I'm not sure if what I've done reflects what you intended, can you take a look? Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 21:28, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Kovačevič. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead, as someone could see your edit before you revert it. Thank you. Matthew_hk t c 08:09, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to York 9 FC does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:39, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Marking sensitive edits as minor

Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor".

In particular, marking this change to Gjilan as *minor* will raise eyebrows. The proper description of places in Kosovo has been the subject of nationalist edit warring in the past. Consider posting at Talk:Gjilan to see if others support your change. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:46, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Indic languages (disambiguation)

The article Indic languages (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Indic languages redirects to Indo-Aryan languages which begins with the hatnote:
"Indic languages" redirects here. It is not to be confused with Languages of India.
This disambiguation page thus looks like an overkill, especially since there's little evidence that the term "Indic language" is often mistakenly used to refer to a language spoken in India.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pichpich (talk) 16:44, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Henry of Wales listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Henry of Wales. Since you had some involvement with the Henry of Wales redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 13:11, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Sveti Andrija, Komiža

Hi, I'm Boleyn. SrpskiAnonimac, thanks for creating Sveti Andrija, Komiža!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 13:30, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please respond? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 21:19, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You've continued to edit, but not respond. Communication is mandatory when other editors raise concerns about your editing. Where did you get the information for the article? Boleyn (talk) 06:52, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Boleyn: I wrote it, similar to the written articles about the villages in Croatia, what? .... I don't know English, I translation through translators .... I'm sorry I did not answer you earlier --SrpskiAnonimac (talk) 10:21, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for replying. What was your source? Boleyn (talk) 11:24, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand this for the "source" ... I made that article because he was not the only one here Sveti Andrija (disambiguation) --SrpskiAnonimac (talk) 12:03, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you get the information from? The information you wrote in the article, Sveti Andrija, Komiža? Boleyn (talk) 13:18, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Boleyn: Wikipedia on Croatian language --SrpskiAnonimac (talk) 14:09, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I redirected the article to Svetac, which covers the historical population of its only village in more detail. Even if it were still inhabited, I don't think we need separate articles on a tiny island and its only settlement. No such user (talk) 14:40, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Boleyn: the island is a island, the village is a village....on Croatian Wikipedia and other Wikipedias, articles are separated....the island is called Svetac (the domestic Chakavian name for Svetac is Štondrija), village - Sveti Andrija --SrpskiAnonimac (talk) 15:11, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't redirect it, but I am not surprised that this happened as it was so short and unsourced. Croatian Wikipedia has sources (Izvori) but when you copied the article you didn't add them. Thanks for your work on this, Boleyn (talk) 19:48, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Boleyn:, @No such user: in the article for the island there are categories related to the island, in the article for the village - categories for the village....and in both articles there are different templates--SrpskiAnonimac (talk) 21:19, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Meh. Of what use for a reader is the infobox and category for an uninhabited village, with a dozen abandoned houses, located on a 2-km long island? At least the information in the island article provides context and information about its history. By the way, they have the same official name — Sveti Andrija – and the island's article resides on the more commonly recognized name, Svetac. I won't edit-war on it, but creating such articles is a pretty lame business. No such user (talk) 06:57, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Topia (disambiguation)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Topia (disambiguation), SrpskiAnonimac!

Wikipedia editor Bennv3771 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

For future reference, do have a look through MOS:DAB.

To reply, leave a comment on Bennv3771's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Bennv3771 (talk) 17:22, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Major Double Redirect Problem

Smash!

You've been squished by a whale!
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something really silly.

You created a major double redirect problem that took weeks to solve. The bots couldn't fix it. Now, everything that you redirected is redirected to Ilyrian dog. Don't do that again. 24.205.150.243 (talk) 00:01, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gorani language (Gorani) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gorani language (Gorani). Since you had some involvement with the Gorani language (Gorani) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. – Uanfala (talk) 16:34, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking and unexplained revert

Hi SrpskiAnonimac, could you please explain your revert of my edit Special:Diff/873267445/873341553? Reverts of any edit other than vandalism require an explanation in the edit summary. Do you have some reason that MOS:OVERLINK, which says not to wikilink major geographical features, does not apply to "Mexico" in this case? The relevant guideline for what not to link is:

"This generally includes major examples of geographic features (e.g., the Himalayas, Pacific Ocean, South America), locations (e.g., United States; New York City, or just New York if the city context is already clear; London, if the context rules out London, Ontario; Japan; Brazil; Southeast Asia), languages (e.g., English, Arabic, Korean, Spanish), nationalities and ethnicities (e.g., English, British, Chinese, Turkish; African-American, Hispanic), and religions (e.g., Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism)."

Thanks... --IamNotU (talk) 16:18, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Forebears.io

Please don't use forebears.io (and many similar sources) in articles, it is not a reliable source. This has been discussed repeatedly at the reliable sources noticeboard and the general consensus is that it is not an acceptable source for the English Wikipedia. Fram (talk) 13:22, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Piping into redirects

Piping a link into a redirect, as you did here, doesn't make sense. Either you use the redirect (e.g. [[Federal Republic of Yugoslavia]], which redirects to Serbia and Montenegro), or you use a piped link, piping straight into the target article, for example [[Serbia and Montenegro|1992 Yugoslavia]]. Piping into a redirect instead of the target article (i.e. [[Federal Republic of Yugoslavia|1992 Yugoslavia]]) is totally pointless, adds unnecessary text to the target page ("Redirected from" etc.) and messes up the 'What links here' information, so please don't do it. Thanks. --Deeday-UK (talk) 16:24, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Four years after this comment, you are still doing the same ([2]). Why? Vanjagenije (talk) 09:49, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rascia

Hello. I see that you have changed redirect Rascia to lead to a disambiguation page. Please can you help to fix the resulting misdirected links? I've had a try, but the best destination is not obvious to those of us who don't know the history of the area. Thanks, Certes (talk) 19:43, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Macedondom" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Macedondom. Since you had some involvement with the Macedondom redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:56, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Thanks for creating Big Staircase in Kalemegdan Park.

User:Newslinger while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for contributing this article on Serbian architecture to Wikipedia!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Newslinger}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

— Newslinger talk 04:56, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

East central zone, etc.

Hi, I've sent to RfD a bunch of redirects which you've created (or recently edited). The discussion is at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2019_November_8#East_Central_zone. Thanks! – Uanfala (talk) 01:18, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Prykarpattia (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Prykarpattia (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ... discospinster _talk 18:05, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Milana (film)

Hi SrpskiAnonimac. When you move pages like "Milana" for diambiguation purposes, please check to make sure that there aren't any non-free files being used in the article. All non-free files are required to have separate specific non-free use rationales for each use; so, when you change the name of an article, the rationale also needs to be correspondingly changed to avoid problems like this. I caught this and re-added the file to the infobox, but non-free files which aren't being used in any articles can be speedily deleted per WP:F5 after five days. - Marchjuly (talk) 05:30, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, SrpskiAnonimac

Thank you for creating Western Turki language.

User:Rosguill, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Do you have a specific source establishing that this is another name for Uzbek language? Looking on Google Scholar, while there does appear to be some vague identification of the term "Western Turki" with Uzbek peoples, other sources seem to use it to refer to Turkish, and yet others seem to identify it with historical states in central Asia of unclear ethnolinguistic character.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:54, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Svitlana Zakharova and Svetlana Zakharova

Hi SrpskiAnonimac, I'm wondering if it would be worthwhile to combine the entries on Svitlana Zakharova and Svetlana Zakharova, and make Svitlana Zakharova (the newer page) a redirect to Svetlana Zakharova (the older page). Many readers/editors wouldn't know which spelling they are looking for, so having all four names on one page would be more efficient. What do you think? Leschnei (talk) 11:16, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bileća (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bileća (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:00, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sopoti (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sopoti (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:34, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Serbian given names for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Serbian given names is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Serbian given names until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 20:30, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Hej (interjection)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Hej (interjection). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 8#Hej (interjection) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 21:55, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Permyak language

[lAlternative Title: Komi-Permyak language] Белорецкий (talk) 15:52, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"New calendar" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect New calendar. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 15#New calendar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 (he) ^talk _contribs ^subpages 17:44, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of City municipality of Užice for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article City municipality of Užice is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/City municipality of Užice until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

No such user (talk) 08:36, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Undiscussed moves YET again.

Please DON'T do undiscussed moves of important articles. Use the proper WP:RM procedure. I will revert you. Johnbod (talk) 05:01, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Persian Sea" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Persian Sea. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 18#Persian Sea until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin (she/they, no pref.) | o toki tawa mi. 07:42, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hello, I'm Ost316. I noticed that you recently removed content from Klokot-Vrbovac without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ost (talk) 14:22, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

unexplained moves

Please use the field called Reason when you want to move pages, because I've just had to undo a bad move at Kijevo, Croatia and it would probably be a good idea to think about rationales first so we don't waste each other's time. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 14:53, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I specifically mention this is because I recently happened to come across this move from 2017 where you did the same kind of a thing.

A quick review of your contributions indicates a lot of moves, most of which seem sensible, but I also found one at Kozica, Croatia which is dubious (while a toponym search at https://geoportal.dgu.hr/ does find one other location in Croatia of the same name, it seems to be a minor mountain peak).

It's really a good idea to explain what you're trying to do. I also noticed no usage of WP:Edit summary fields. This is a collaborative encyclopedia, and the editing policy on having to explain what you do is not optional. Ignoring that for so many years is a pattern that is troublesome.

If you don't know enough English to properly explain, perhaps seek help from someone who can help you translate, there's projects like WT:SRB, WT:HRV etc where you can surely find someone to assist.

Ako vas nedovoljno poznavanje engleskog jezika onemogućuje da razumijete sve što je ovdje napisano, slobodno komentirajte na svom jeziku.

--Joy [shallot] (talk) 15:10, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Canton (Canton)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Canton (Canton) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 19#Canton (Canton) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 19:43, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Petrovichi (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Petrovichi (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:18, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Slavo-Macedonia" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Slavo-Macedonia and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 18#Slavomacedonia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 01:23, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rusin (disambiguation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rusyn.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Russin (disambiguation)

Russin is the primary topic for Russin (disambiguation), so it goes at the top of the page per WP:DABPRIMARY. If you feel that Russin should redirect to Rusyn instead, you could start a discussion at Talk:Russin. Leschnei (talk) 13:11, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Macedonization

Hello SrpskiAnonimac,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Jingiby, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Macedonization, for deletion, because there's already a page about that topic at It was redirect of Macedonism and Macedonian nationalism but Wikipedia:SPA have restored it several times.. Please don't be discouraged; we appreciate your effort in creating new articles. To avoid this in the future, consider using the search function to find pages that already cover what you want to write about.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Jingiby}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Jingiby (talk) 04:21, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lusatia (disambiguation)

The article Lusatia (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

"Lusatia" is not ambiguous. Lower Lusatia and Upper Lusatia are both linked from the first paragraph of Lusatia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:22, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unilateral title/redirect changes contrary to disambiguation guideline and editing policy

The edit here was so obviously wrong, it pains me to have to explain it, but here we go again... The guideline at WP:D explains how disambiguation works in the English Wikipedia. For example, if there's multiple mountains named "Kozjak", and one of them is substantially more notable than the others, you can claim WP:PTOPIC or WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT - though more often than not, none of them will be primary and readers should be navigated to a list that helps them find the right one they're looking for. But, you cannot do any of that by fiat - you have to post a modicum of an explanation about what you are doing and why.

I see in the history above that myself and multiple other editors have warned you about unilateral edits, many years ago already. Wikipedia:Editing policy is not optional, but apparently you seem to treat it like it is.

This is the last time I've tolerated this - if the spirit or text of WP:UNRESPONSIVE is violated again by this account, I will block it. --Joy (talk) 14:31, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sar Mountains National Park (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sar Mountains National Park (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:16, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kommuna, Russia

Hello, SrpskiAnonimac

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username EytanMelech, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Kommuna, Russia, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|EytanMelech}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

EytanMelech (talk) 15:28, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, SrpskiAnonimac. Thank you for your work on The Welshman (disambiguation). User:Voorts, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please remember to tag redirects that you create per WP:REDCAT.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Voorts}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

voorts (talk/contributions) 16:12, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Bosanac"

I noticed you seemed to move this half a dozen times. None of them seemed to have an explanation attached. Please learn to use an Help:Edit summary. I thought we were over this already? --Joy (talk) 21:19, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"2-space" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 2-space has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 7 § 2-space until a consensus is reached. fgnievinski (talk) 04:51, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"2-dimensional space" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 2-dimensional space has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 7 § 2-dimensional space until a consensus is reached. fgnievinski (talk) 04:51, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Repeated unexplained page moves, disruptive edits to disambiguation pages, creation of very large number of manifestly useless new redirect pages. Please stop. Doanri (talk) 13:11, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Veles

Please observe the guidelines at WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT before making changes like this again. For example, open https://wikinav.toolforge.org/?language=en&title=Veles before you make the move and observe how the meaning you chose to redirect is not the one with the most reader interest. Honestly, I'm tired of reverting you like this, where the action is apparently reckless and no edit summaries or talk messages are used over dozens of edits. Next time you violate the Wikipedia:Editing policy like this, I'm just going to block you from editing. --Joy (talk) 09:10, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I see from the history of this page that these warnings have been going on through this year and also since 2021, and other people have warned you as well. I've checked https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&end=&namespace=1&start=&tagfilter=&target=SrpskiAnonimac&offset=&limit=500 to see if there was ever any attempt to communicate, and there doesn't seem to be any. I also checked https://sigma.toolforge.org/summary.py?name=SrpskiAnonimac&search=&server=enwiki&max=500&ns=&enddate=&startdate= and there's nothing of substance there either. Sorry, this is unacceptable. --Joy (talk) 09:14, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Joy (talk) 09:15, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 19:48, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted move

I've reverted your move of Kuban oblast to Kuban Oblast as the original title was correct per WP:NCCAPS. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 16:26, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Porecje (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Porecje (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:00, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi SrpskiAnonimac. Thank you for your work on Styria (federal state). Another editor, Voorts, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please remember to tag redirects that you create per WP:REDCAT.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Voorts}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

voorts (talk/contributions) 01:17, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Legendary beast" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Legendary beast has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 4 § Legendary beast until a consensus is reached. Web-julio (talk) 04:36, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]