User talk:Spodle/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi ShiriEdits! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 01:06, Thursday, January 27, 2022 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Stubs

Hallo, Please never add a stub category directly as you did here. Use the appropriate stub template, which adds both the category and the stub message: {{cryptocurrency-stub}} here. I've fixed it. PamD 08:15, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Malta film awards

A tag has been placed on Category:Malta film awards indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:01, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, ShiriEdits, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:42, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! ShiriEdits, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 20:42, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Forensic examination Vs Medico legal examination

Greetings,

• Edit under discussion dated March 8, 2022 by User:ShiriEdits

• Article in context 2021 Minar-e-Pakistan mass sexual assault

In referenced to your above stated good faith edit, I discussed nuances of 'Forensic and Medico legal terminology with couple of copy editors from Women in Red Project and we came to tentative conclusion that specific term 'medico−legal' seems more apt in given context. Points are briefly listed in following given table for your perusal and inputs if any from your side. You can also support us by copy editing following information. Looking forward to you response.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 09:07, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Medical examination of Ayesha Akram,..., was completed at Nawaz Sharif Teaching Hospital.( dunyanews.tv) The victim was brought to a hospital in Lahore on Thursday* for medico-legal examination.( samaaenglish.tv) The Punjab government released Friday the medical examination report of the victim which confirmed details of the injuries she sustained after being assaulted.(Geo TV).

According to a medico- legal report, the victim was found to have dozens of bruises and scratches on the body including her chest, waist, legs and elbow besides inflammation on the neck and hands.

• *Date of Incidence Saturday, 14 August 2021; Date of medico legal examination: Thursday 19 August 2021, Date of medico legal report Friday 19 August 2021

Nuanced differences in terminology of 'Forensic' and 'Medico legal'

	Forensic	Medico legal
	General nuances
1	Term includes general applications other than Medico Legal too like Digital Forensic report Usage of general term Forensic without mentioning Clinical Forensic can introduce ambiguity which forensic one is talking about?	Specific meant for Medico legal
2	Even within Clinical Forensic What an assistant expert prepares report is technically scientific thus forensic but until designated authority would not sign will not get legal status	Report attains legal admissibility only on signature of designated authority
3	Even within Clinical Forensic at times forensic expert can provide interim information report to investigative agencies to facilitate investigation, though such interim information reports are forensic, can not be considered legally admissible until final final report is authoritatively signed	Medico legal report attains sanctity of legal admissibility (though remains open to cross examination during legal proceeding and unless struck down by court Medico legal report is considered factual)
4	Term Forensic report is used more in case of deceased because body is subjected to detail examination for autopsy	In many assault cases where victim is alive mere physical examination of the victim by expert can be sufficient so report by designated doctor are considered Medico legal
	From World Health Organization article:
5	This article from the World Health Organization, indicates that a forensic examination is only part of the process to create a MLE report which also includes examination of social services, police investigation, and legal systems. (page 1)
	Pakistan Specific
6	Pakistan media seem to be using 'medico–legal' usually for physical examination of assault victims (including non sexual assaults) by authorized medical doctor. For digital and DNA exams they seem to be using term 'forensic examination', The difference is probably because laws use term 'medico–legal' for assault related physical examination.	Of the six news reports surveyed for Minar e Pakistan case by me 4 use word 'medico-legal' and two use wording just 'medical examination". My perception is though report is prepared by authorized medical doctor (in south Asia it's generally in Government hospitals) wording is 'medico–legal' is used since such doctor's report is as per legal process, creates obligations on Investigative agencies and acceptable and admissible to judiciary as reliable evidence.
7		On Nov. 2020 Express Tribune news report provides following information: The revised guidelines state that the medico-legal examination (MLE) of the survivor should only be undertaken on the judicial order under the Women Protection Act 2006 and after written consent obtained from the survivor or her parents/guardians if she is under 18-years of age. The examination also can only be done by an authorised women medical officer. (WMO).

Requesting your inputs to above points and copy edit support to above comparison points if possible.

References

@Bookku: Your and the people from WP:Women in Red arguments for the use of the term "medico-legal" instead of "forensic examination" in the 2021 Minar-e-Pakistan mass sexual assault article are perfectly reasonable and justifiable and I accept the planned replacement of the term whole-heartedly. I made an accidental mistake in changing that term, and I accept the planned change. I will change the wording as soon as I can. Just for curiosity's sake, can you give me the link to the conversation you had with WP:Women in Red members? Just want to see how you and the members came to a consensus. If that is not possible, that is okay. ShiriEdits^Talk 09:45, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Many thanks @ ShiriEdits, what we formed @ this discussion is 'tentative conclusion'. Consensus comes after your concurrence or more discussion if you do not agree. So thanks for thinking over the points positively and look forward to your support.

Regards

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 10:17, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Adrian Stresow

Template:Adrian Stresow has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:53, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Honour killing of Mona Heydari has been accepted

Honour killing of Mona Heydari, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 09:53, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi ShiriEdits! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How can you cite financial statements?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Dennis Jose Borbon has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dennis Jose Borbon. Thanks! Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 05:33, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dennis Jose Borbon (May 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robertsky was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dennis Jose Borbon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dennis Jose Borbon, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be tagged for G13 deletion.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 01:21, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Propel Manila (May 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Propel Manila and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Propel Manila, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be tagged for G13 deletion.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:38, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Mario & Luigi: Dream Team GA review

Hi ShiriEdits - I saw your query regarding reviewing a GA nomination (GAN). I'll walk you through the review. First thing you need to do is go to Talk:Mario & Luigi: Dream Team/GA1, and beneath all the text on that page, make a comment saying that you are going to do the review, and sign it. There is advice here on reviewing: Wikipedia:Good_article_nominations/Instructions#Reviewing. It helps to use a template - you can select one from here: Wikipedia:Good_article_nominations/templates. A good one is {{GATable}}, which when pasted looks like this:

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.

Using a template helps keep you focused on the GA criteria. When you have make a comment on the nomination page, and are ready to start the review, I'll talk you through how to do the review itself. The aim would in general be to have the review done in seven days (often quicker, sometimes a bit longer if the article is complex), and then either pass it (rare to pass without some quibble, but it has been known), fail it (very rare - the article would need to be in a very bad state to quick fail it), or - as is usual, put it on hold for seven days to allow the nominator (and/or anyone else) to work on it to address the issues you have raised. The seven days is a guide - you can hold the review open for longer. However, what is clear is that you need to be available to work on the review for at least two weeks. I have the review page and your talkpage watchlisted, so I should see when you edit. My email is enabled, so you can email me at any time. I am in the UK time zone, which appears to be different to yours, though you do edit between 9 and 12 GMT, so we can chat live then. SilkTork (talk) 15:55, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Well, I see you have started the review. I take it that you don't wish for any advice. I'll take the article and your talkpage off my watchlist, but I'm here if you need me. Just ping. SilkTork (talk) 08:36, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

@SilkTork: Oh hi, sorry if I started the review early. I had a lot of time to spare (it's summer in the Philippines right now) and decided to start the GA review early. Sorry if I didn't wait for you. ShiriEdits^Talk 09:20, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

That's fine. Give me a shout if you're unsure about anything, or if you want me to look over the review. SilkTork (talk) 09:23, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Category:Kumu (social network) original programming has been nominated for deletion

Category:Kumu (social network) original programming has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DownTownRich (talk) 21:06, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, ShiriEdits,

You might want to go to this discussion and argue why this category should not be deleted. I tried to explain what the purpose of it was but I'm sure you are more familiar with the subject than I. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:49, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Coolearth Architecture logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Coolearth Architecture logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Kaputol ng Isang Awit (movie) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kaputol ng Isang Awit (movie), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 06:03, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sony Music Mexico logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sony Music Mexico logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Valorant userboxes

Hello. I saw your Valorant userboxes. You can replace the content at User:Spodle/UBX/Valorant with the following code at to combine all of them to one userbox:

<includeonly>{{Userbox
  |id       = [[File:Valorant_logo_-_pink_color_version.svg|90px|Valorant logo]]
  |id-c     = #ffffff
  |id-fc    = white
  |info     = <strong><big>This user mains [[Valorant|{{{1}}}]]</big></strong>
  |info-c   = #ed1a13
  |info-fc  = white
  |info-a   = center
  |border-c = red
  |usercategory  = Wikipedians who main {{{1}}}
  |nocat={{{nocat|}}}
}}</includeonly><noinclude>
This is all the Valorant userboxes I have created.

{{yytop}}
{{yy|User:Spodle/UBX/Valorant|Astra}}
{{yy|User:Spodle/UBX/Valorant|Breach}}
{{yy|User:Spodle/UBX/Valorant|Brimstone}}
{{yy|User:Spodle/UBX/Valorant|Chamber}}
{{yy|User:Spodle/UBX/Valorant|Cypher}}
{{yy|User:Spodle/UBX/Valorant|Jett}}
{{yy|User:Spodle/UBX/Valorant|KAYo}}
{{yy|User:Spodle/UBX/Valorant|Killjoy}}
{{yy|User:Spodle/UBX/Valorant|Neon}}
{{yy|User:Spodle/UBX/Valorant|Omen}}
{{yy|User:Spodle/UBX/Valorant|Phoenix}}
{{yy|User:Spodle/UBX/Valorant|Raze}}
{{yy|User:Spodle/UBX/Valorant|Reyna}}
{{yy|User:Spodle/UBX/Valorant|Sova}}
{{yy|User:Spodle/UBX/Valorant|Skye}}
{{yy|User:Spodle/UBX/Valorant|Viper}}
{{yy|User:Spodle/UBX/Valorant|Yoru}}
{{yybottom}}
</noinclude>

To use it: {{User:Spodle/UBX/Valorant|Agent's name}}. Just figured I'd swing by an give that suggestion. Cheers! – Pbrks ^(t • c) 14:58, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

@Pbrks: Thanks for the suggestion! Pretty nifty as well, since the userboxes are merged and you can swap between agent names. Spodle^Talk 00:39, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Polish companies established in 2014

A tag has been placed on Category:Polish companies established in 2014 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:56, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:First Gen Corporation

Hello, Spodle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:First Gen Corporation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Albert H. Marckwardt moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Albert H. Marckwardt, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:15, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:First Gen Corporation

Hello, Spodle. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "First Gen Corporation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:52, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Artesian Builds has been accepted

Artesian Builds, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MaxnaCarta (talk) 09:17, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lourdes Evangelista-Castro

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lourdes Evangelista-Castro requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://globalnation.inquirer.net/20861/lourdes-castro-1926-2011-the-story-of-a-rare-and-great-hero. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 09:21, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Lourdes Evangelista-Castro moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lourdes Evangelista-Castro, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:21, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:General elections in the Philippines

Hello, Spodle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:General elections in the Philippines, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 9 January 2023 (UTC)