User talk:Snowolf/Archives/200801
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Snowolf. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Your banner
Hi, Snowolf! I just came here a minute ago to move a new comment to the bottom for you, and I had a bit of trouble on account of that huge position:absolute table you have at the top of your page. On edit pages, it covers the top half (about) of the edit box, which makes it really difficult to do anything that's not a section edit. I've added an element hiding rule in ABP, but it would be great if you could make it hideable with the collapse function, so as not to interfere on the edit page. Thanks! Tuvok[T@lk/Improve me] 15:21, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
hello
I thought that i had put a good input into the Pendleton Civil Service Act reading. Please show me what i did wrong. Thanks! and remember to take a shower! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.46.69.16 (talk) 01:00, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
RfA thanks
|
Thank you for voting in my RfA, which passed nearly unanimously with 46 support, 1 oppose, and 0 neutral. Thanks for supporting me! |
-Djsasso (talk) 17:49, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Cheers!
Thanks for approving my NPW request! ><RichardΩ612 19:09, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
WP:AIAV
Hold on. If an IP makes nothing but disruptive edits, receives all warnings, is blocked, and then comes back to vandalize again...Then that isn't reason to block them? Regards, Bogdan що? 19:11, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Awards Role Call
// F9T 19:51, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- I am notifying all the users first, give me 10 minutes. // F9T 19:55, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello
I wanted to say happy new years, snowolf!!!--Mr_KC (talk) 15:50, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
sorry if it was late telling you that, but better late than never//// Is there a member list on wikipedia??? --Mr_KC (talk) 18:08, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Relatedness of certain IRC channels to Wikipedia
On RFAR IRC Workshop you said, I think it's too open to interpretation: a broad view would include channels like #vandalproof, #cvn-wp-en or #npwatcher which are not strictly linked to the English Wikipedia, but are still related to it..
Agreed, and to clarify, the CVN channels have their own group contact and are a completely separate entity. I sincerely doubt that CVN staff will give a moment's thought to granting any external entity (in this case, Wikipedia and by extension ArbCom) control over its methods and policies. CVN's remit is to Wikis is general and hardly only to those controlled by the WMF.
This statement brought to you wearing only my hat of "CVN Senior Staff", ~Kylu (u|t) 03:27, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Can you please add Category:American military personnel of World War II.--Dr who1975 (talk) 01:47, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks!
|
Thanks for your support | |
| Thank you SO MUCH for your support in my unanimous RFA. Take this cookie as a small token of my appreciation.--Jayron32|talk|contribs 05:55, 11 January 2008 (UTC) |
Signpost updated for January 2nd and 7th, 2008.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 1 | 2 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 2 | 7 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:25, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
re: NPWatcher application
Hi there - thanks for your reply to my application. Could you please explain how you established whether or not I have read and understood the criteria for speedy deletion? I'm not in a huff, I'm just interested as to your reasoning. Cheers, Pumpmeup 11:18, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- Just so that the archive won't step in. I'll deal with it tomorrow, sorry I wasn't around for a couple of days. Snowolf How can I help? 00:56, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Bot?
How do i get a user bot? ♥♦¢åŗđş♣♠ (talk) 16:31, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Block of User:Slick legend
48 hours or 8 hours? - Rjd0060 (talk) 00:48, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- No problem ;-) . - Rjd0060 (talk) 00:53, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Since you are around, I guess I'll ask you. A user created a couple user and user talk pages of other users, with random characters. I've tagged them for speedy as vandalism, but I am second guessing myself. Would that be correct? See User talk:80.229.144.223, User:80.229.144.223, and User:Enesco. I've removed the text that was added from the first two already. Rjd0060 (talk) 00:55, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you. - Rjd0060 (talk) 01:00, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Rudget!
January 2008
Eight lots of vandalism in 13 minutes is inadequate? --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 17:47, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- OK, he's now been blocked on my second report. Could have saved us some time there. But a good example of how useful rollback is for non-admins. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 17:55, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello Snowolf. I wanted to request approval for using NPW. Now, the reason why I am writing this here on your talk page instead of just adding myself to the list on the approval page: I have already applied before once back in May 2007,[1] and been rejected[2] for a lack of understanding of policy (the reason can be seen on that diff of my talk page too, the paragraph right above). I feel I have since gained a much better understanding of policy, especially the CSD criteria, and would therefore like to apply again. I didn't know if I should/could just add these words next to my name in the approval list, so I thought I'd talk to you first. Twsx (user · talk · contribs · count · ESU · logs · subpages) ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 05:44, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Just so that the archive won't step in. I'll deal with it tomorrow, sorry I wasn't around for a couple of days. Snowolf How can I help? 00:56, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- I never thought about it more thoroughly. I shall do so from now on, thank you for the approval. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 22:16, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
"Hasn't vandalised at all?" - does continued insertion of spam information about a non-notable company on their userpage (speedied) and user talk page not count, in your view? Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 15:28, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- I tagged their userpage for speedy, and it was deleted. Their user talk page here contains the same information. History says it all, I think. Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 15:30, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- Ed's picked it up. Regards. Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 15:38, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm an idiot
[3] Gah, you're right, I jumped to a confusion (saw an RfA get withdrawn from the main page, then saw the incredibly-low-percentage on the report and put two and two together... and got five). I've been slipping a lot lately... I think it's time for a wikibreak, before I delete Main Page or something. :) EVula // talk // ☯ // 16:57, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi Snowolf, as I put my name down the request list I noticed there was a small backlog. Just thought I'd bring it to your attention. Take care and thanks [if you decide to approve me]! :-) ScarianCall me Pat 18:56, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Recent Edits
Hello. I think you and I are crossing paths inadvertently. I think I rolled back something that looked like it was last edited by you, and you may have done the same, when both of us were trying to prevent vandalism.
Jmanigold (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Jmanigold (talk) 01:01, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Recent blocks of 76.229.92.158 & 24.202.245.116
HI, I noticed that you recently blocked both of these IP addresses indefinitely. I think you might have inadvertently made a mistake as the messages you placed on their talk pages were for temporary blocks and per WP:IP, IP addresses should not be blocked indefinitely. --Hdt83 Chat 01:18, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
poo89 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Barnian (talk • contribs) 17:40, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
E-mail.
Forgot to leave you a message, but I e-mailed you yesterday. · AndonicO Hail! 13:39, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
A belated thank you for your RFA support! Archtransit (talk) 21:15, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 14th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 3 | 14 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:02, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:23, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
My RfA
Hey there, I'm writing to inform you that I have withdrawn my request for adminship, which was currently standing at 11 supports, 22 opposes and 6 neutrals. This count could have been so much better if I had understood policy, although I believe that 17 questions is a lot to ask of a user's first RfA. I will take on all comments given at the RfA and will endeavour to meet the high expectations of the RfA voters. WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDENplay it cool. 21:41, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Scusa ma non l'ho capita
[4] --Snowdog (talk) 23:03, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- [5] Me too I don' t understand these deletions in my talk page and I'm kindly asking for an explanation --Bramfab 12:12, 21 January 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bramfab (talk • contribs)
Revert
How dare you revert R and then unrevert your revert back to R's version. It just goes to show you... R is always right....and don't you forget it. O_O :D. Hmm...it appears I just beat you to a revert. :]. And you want to help that user? I'm a bit busy with Huggle. -- R TalkContribs@ 17:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Blocked myself - again! XD Snowolf How can I help? 19:29, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
RC Patrol
It's people like you that make us manual RC patrollers feel useless! I've been beaten to an edit 6 times in the last 20 minutes by you! grrrr. :-) --.ιΙ Inhuman14 Ιι. 19:32, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm using Lupin's, because IRC and direct connection interfaces do not work with my parental restrictions. :-( --.ιΙ Inhuman14 Ιι. 19:36, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Re Link Reversions
Follow the full deletion discussion on the page with the copyrighted terms (I don't want to mention it here because the point is to end involvement with Wikipedia and remove all copyrighted terms and every time you mention the page google crawls and and you guys spawn like 50 more auto-pages ... it's totally ridiculous). The history is we added an article on a piece of software, got into an argument related to bias in the NMS list, and decided to end all involvement with wikipedia and you guys keep recreating web pages that use our trademarks without our permission as a result. The end decision is that the issues were not constructive and the related pages were permanently courtesy blanked, as these two pages should be as well. We will not be having any further involvement with Wikipedia once these pages don't show up on google indexes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Popperian (talk • contribs) 20:22, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Editing and citations
I am unaware due to relative newbieness how to do sources and stuff. Proof of the edit i made is only i witnessed it first hand when it happened and i suppose the Archimedes institute would also be proof and could therefore be qouted as citation. I chose this subject as my first contribution to wikipedia as it is something only a limited number of people would be as aware of as i am. —Preceding unsigned comment added by PJPIP (talk • contribs) 21:13, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Deletion Review for JANJAN
An editor has asked for a deletion review of JANJAN. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Joe 21:23, 21 January 2008 (UTC) (not the nominator)
My change
My change was made as it was actually correct information. If you read her profile at Nbc10.com you will find that she does live with a dog and not a small boy. I will be changing it back and will do it everyday if need be. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.38.6.30 (talk) 22:13, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Cyprus
A regime, not a recognized government rules the occupied areas of Cyprus. The original wording was changed by user 82.34.251.230, on 16 Jan, see [6]. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.99.136.176 (talk) 23:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Bob Golic
I think you should take a more careful look at the material you reincluded by reverting my edit. And then, you can remove the template you place on my page. Thanks. --Mr R 23:33, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- No problem. Cheers. --Mr R 23:36, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
What the hell is your problem? He was! Fact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.196.5.102 (talk) 23:55, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- With regards to the editor you just blocked; I think he is working in tandem with a sock or meatie. Check out the contribs of ChipDAripper and Mpokorny08 (the editor you blocked). Looks stunningly similar.
<Edit conflict addition> & check out the user above. Reckon they all deserve the boot.Baegis (talk) 23:59, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks.
Replied. Thanks for the heads-up; I thought I read somewhere that while allowed, blanking warnings was discouraged. · AndonicO Hail! 00:23, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks again. Happy hunting to you too... beating me to too many reverts though. ;) · AndonicO Hail! 00:30, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm having some problems with this IP continually introducing uncited information to various astrology articles. As you may have seen on his/her talk page, there have been repeated efforts to get them to cite their sources but they do not respond and simply continue. Any constructive advice? Pairadox (talk) 00:24, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Ya know, communication is a virtue. While I realize you get a lot of flak for your efforts, you could at least acknowledge the legit questions. Pairadox (talk) 11:57, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
edits for John Haughm
I am correcting errors for a page about *me*. There is quite a bit of information that is wrong. Please tell me what is needed to prove my identity so that these changes will stay as I have made them.
J. Haughm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.193.141.189 (talk) 00:27, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Oiiiiiiiiiii!!!!
Stop this you internet Nazi... just stop this nonesense and restore my comment about Claus Thomsen.
PS. There's something else I edited but you will never find it. Tee hee. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.196.5.102 (talk) 00:31, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
AGAIN, you are adding back information that is incorrect!!!!
How is it vandalism if I am correcting info about MYSELF!!!! I plan to add corect information if you would STOP undoing all of my work!!!
Not to mention you have even undone my birth date which I entered!!!
Please respond!
J. Haughm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.193.141.189 (talk) 00:35, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
That is fine. I thank you for keeping an eye out for such things and understand how mistakes such as this can be made.
If Wikipedia wants true information about my musical background, I will be happy to submit it myself. I will not tolerate, however, someone who knows little about me writing it on my behalf!
J. Haughm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.193.141.189 (talk) 00:43, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Barnstar
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| For reverting vandals faster than I! ChetblongTalkSign 01:26, 22 January 2008 (UTC) |
- Thank you! Snowolf How can I help? 01:32, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
No sources
I removed the parts of the article where no sources are provided. Please restore back my edits and please understand that what I did is not vandalism by any mean. Thank you --66.57.86.203 (talk) 02:03, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
WHY ARE YOU ACTING LIKE A DICK??
I WRITE THE TRUTH. I AM A BETTER QUALIFIED TENNIS REORTER THAN ARE YOU, SIR. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.189.198.229 (talk) 02:07, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Motivo
Non essendo amministratore continui a minacciarmi senza motivo!!!! Un amministratore può bloccarmi non tu!!!!--PIO (talk) 13:44, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Il problema è che ho cercato il tuo soprannome, nella lista che sta nella relativa categoria degli amministratori, non trovandolo: dunque sono dubbioso, ma posso anche essermi sbagliato.--PIO (talk) 13:59, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Italic text —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.123.211.174 (talk) 13:56, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Did you even look at my revert for Super Smash Bros Brawl?
I removed an entire section that had nothing but speculation and forum-esque comments. The very fact you forced me to remove it again makes me look bad on the history page but in the future please look at the actual posts you're reverting.--HeaveTheClay (talk) 16:10, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Look at the top of the page:
This is not a forum for general discussion of Super Smash Bros. (series). Any such messages will be deleted. Please limit discussion to the suggestions on how to improve the content of this article.
Since the discussion is nothing but idle speculation which do not intend on improving the quality of the article then I am justified in removing those forum type of messages. --HeaveTheClay (talk) 16:16, 22 January 2008 (UTC)--HeaveTheClay (talk) 16:16, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Strange Behavior
Is this a bot or something? Your revert of my edit to Assortative mixing makes zero sense: I removed a dead link, you revert, edit my talk page with a vandalism warning, and then revert your own edit to my talk page. And after all that Assortative mixing still has a dead link. Looking at your contribs you are either the fastest (and least careful) vandalism editor or a bot gone out of control. What's the deal here? Somewhat confused, Pugget (talk) 16:30, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, cleared up. I just hadn't seen this kind of anti-vandalism behavior before. Happy vandal hunting! Cheers, Pugget (talk) 16:41, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Not vandalizing!
I'm not vandalizing. I'm adding a sentence with more informations plus a fair illustration of the subject. See here if you want. --86.67.47.68 (talk) 18:34, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Of course I accept your apologize! Thanks for your work and your understanding. --86.67.47.68 (talk) 07:14, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Excuse Me
I Am Not Vandilising Pages I Am Adding TO THe NYUK Page I Did Not Remove Or Tamper The Already Posted Comment What IS The Problem Here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by XxRewindlabsxX (talk • contribs) 18:38, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
I cannot be accused of being intelligent or even mildly entertaining, but hey, at least I am noticed here - in contrast to my life IRL... :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.91.25.155 (talk • contribs) 18:40, 22 Jan 2008
Anthony Pulis Page
You may want to actually read what is on there.
Claims of his father and him being incestious for a start.
I was trying to remove the rubbish people seem to have put on that page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.149.99.7 (talk) 18:57, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
I can't win...
...you keep beating me to the revert! Good work! - Stephanie Daugherty (Triona) - Talk - Comment - 23:43, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Bored
|
|
The I'm Really Bored Barnstar | |
| Given to you because you are reverting all the vandalism faster than I am, and therefore have nothing to do except pass you out a barnstar. =D Malinaccier (talk) 00:44, 23 January 2008 (UTC) |
- Thank you :) Snowolf How can I help? 00:45, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Hiquestiones
Im sorrys i edites pages, how do u sees them so fast? im currious. How do u spot changes so quicklee. Can i help stop the vandaliaism to? English is not me original languaje sorry, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wingstrong (talk • contribs) 00:47, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
HEY YOU!!!
This is your only warning! Stop Beating Compwhizii to reverting Vandalism. Future defeats will result in a permanent block. Thank you :D Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 01:10, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- XD Well, I'm going off in minutes (I hope) :) Snowolf How can I help? 01:12, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
you undid my edits
1) i went to saint thomas, 2 speeches were about starwars 2) the drug topic was highly taboo and created more problem than good 3) why did you undo my post? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.151.102.137 (talk) 01:17, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for restoring my talk page so promptly after vandalism :)
Keep up the good work -- Boris Barowski (talk) 01:31, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Huggle?
What is this {{uw-huggle3}} you speak of here? --Kralizec! (talk) 01:59, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
|
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| In recognition of your tremendous anti-vandalism efforts, I award you with this barnstar. I have never seen the recent changes page almost half full of just 1 user reverting so much vandalism. Keep up the excellent work. :-) Lradrama 13:54, 23 January 2008 (UTC) |
- Thanks but I suspect I clogged it with a mass revert of a spammer ;-) Snowolf How can I help? 14:07, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Guerrilla ontology reversion
I recently removed a very long, not-really-relevant quote from the Guerrilla Ontology article, which you reverted on the grounds that the edit was unconstructive. The quote is about Discordianism, which is related to Guerrilla Ontology, but which is not the same thing. Though the two subjects are related, the quote does not actually explain how. The quote is not identified as a quote nor is it attributed to anyone nor has any effort been made to incorporate it into the larger article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.134.41.188 (talk • contribs) 23:25, 24 Jan 2008
You aare good vandaal huntaa!
Peaace, fellow afrikaaner vandaal huntaa! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.88.191.77 (talk) 22:38, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
AMEN BROTHAAA! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.172.205.219 (talk) 22:45, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
SHUT THE FUCK UP
What I put was NOT vandalism. You really are a FUCKING MORON. I don't plan to use the sandbox.
}}
Fuckbot
Sorry, we weren't able to cum in your mouth. All spooj and semen will enter the vaginal hole. Thank you and make your messy spunk elsewhere. Sloppy dildos will suffice in the asshole. Thank you for your time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SuggestBot (talk • contribs) 19:39, 15 January 2008
Buddy...
Calm down... didn't you have around 18k edits a couple of days ago? I'm seeing 24k now... :O · AndonicO Hail! 15:14, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- Wow... my role model... :) Err... I mean, you're obsessed; take a break. :P · AndonicO Hail! 15:24, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- Wow, you edit wikipedia even when you watch films? Hehe, I make it sound bad... ;) · AndonicO Hail! 15:47, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Wooo! I got 1412 edits on the 23rd! :D *checks Snow's contribs... sees a number with six zeroes* · AndonicO Hail! 00:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
About 250 here, 500 here, 500 here, 500 here, 500 here, 500 here, 150 here. Doing the math, that would be around... 2400. 1000 more than I. :P · AndonicO Hail! 01:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
but
i'm not vandalizing.
stoop is widely used as slang, especially in my part of the country. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.92.207.153 (talk • contribs) 15:58, 23 Jan 2008
ok
can do. citing now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.92.207.153 (talk) 16:07, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Dodgeball
Hello
I am the Creator / Commissioner of Big Apple Dodgeball in New York City. I added info about this new league in NYC but you deleted it. Please keep it in the Dodgeball Wiki page where it belongs along with the other great leagues listed.
Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikimjm (talk • contribs) 18:54, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Vandalism?
I am curious as how anything I have done to te Cal Nichols page is vandalism...I made the page!
Mike oootside of edmonton (talk) 19:41, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- I've been looking at it too, and I am also puzzled by that notice. Could you please explain on the talk page? But I remind Mike that nobody owns a WP article. DGG (talk) 19:46, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Careful
Careful with those tools - not vandalism. PouponOnToast (talk) 20:48, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks :)
Thanks for the comment on my talk page regarding the block/unbock request. It's always nice to see someone get your back. I appreciate it my friend. :) Jmlk17 21:19, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
STFU
why did you revert my edit to the article "STFU". that was not vandalism. I changed the word 'Fuck' to the less vulgar 'Frick', and commented about it. Why are you people saying that anyone can edit - if you just revert everything back the way you like them? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.141.148.195 (talk) 23:31, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Bubbleboy007
Thanks for resolving. Ros0709 (talk) 23:41, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 21st, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 4 | 21 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 00:37, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you!
For reverting vandalism on my userpage! Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 00:44, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
How was that vandelism. Those things i said were true. can u explain? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chazmoney3 (talk • contribs) 01:07, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Not vandalism. User was requesting deletion for the second time. 70.57.146.73 (talk) 01:20, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Matt Gonzalez edit War
I write to you asking for assistance in a matter involving a User:Griot repeated edits to the Matt Gonzalez page. After you reverted the page 19 minutes later Griot changed it back removing referenced info many users have attempted to include. For the last three years I've watched this user edit-war with numerous users over the article making repeated edits the information fought over is usually the same with numerous users restoring it or adding it on there own with griot siding for exclusion dispite the fact the information in question is both factual and referenced. The page has been protected before but he just returns as soon as protection ends and "out edits" the other users. These edits are never discussed by Griot on the talk page and the referenced information he removes has been requested several times on the talk page. The Grounds for exclusion are often too much detail but some of this detail is needed to expalin things for people living outside the San Francisco bay area. unfortunatly I don't have an account but that in no way removes the factual nature of the dispute. I have no idea if you can help if not at least Thanks for your time. 139.102.16.185 (talk) 05:33, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Maybe some kind of mediation (WP:MEDCAB, WP:MEDCOM) can be of some use. Snowolf How can I help? 15:03, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
UNPROFESSIONAL BEHAVIOUR
User talk:Mayalld and you self seem to display a knee jerk reactions that lack tack and simple politeness, it should be apparent to both of you “ADMINISRATORS” that I am new to Wikipedia and simply trying to communicate with you. But you obviously let your “Power” get the better of you.......sending level 2 warnings over "Vandalism?" please get real!!!
I DID NOT VANDALISE ANY PAGE it should have been apparent that I was trying to leave a message and simply posted it in the wrong place!
Mayllad said “post it at the Bottom of the page” which I did , and I did not delete any existing comments, Please go and look up the wikipedia definition of Vandalism……since you brought it up, and thet is no facility to "add nenw comments to Mayllard's page without editing the page and adding your new comment. if there is please tell me how
But that is not the issue here if AMERICAS NEXT TOP MODEL EXHISTS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America's_Next_Top_Model and is considered OK and 33 other international version also exist, why is ETHIOPIA’S NEXT TOP MODEL not ok? What is the difference? Miss ethiopia (talk) 09:58, 24 January 2008 (UTC) Miss Ethiopia
Reposting.
Don't think you saw this in the header way above, so I'll repost here: About 250 here, 500 here, 500 here, 500 here, 500 here, 500 here, 150 here. Doing the math, that would be around... 2400. 1000 more than I. :P · AndonicO Hail! 01:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Well, good luck then. I'm not going to be on huggle today, perhaps tomorrow. Take this chance to inflate your edit count... again. ;) · AndonicO Hail! 14:50, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
semi some pages?
Hi, favor? Could you attend to my request at: Wikipedia:Requests for page protection; oldid, if needed. swatting this bad boy is getting boring. Cheers, Jack Merridew 14:03, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
proposta
Ciao, io e user:Cherso contattiamo amministratori per far cambiare la decisione di messa al bando per user:Giovanni Giove. La mia proposta è questa: tu potresti inserire un messaggio in questa pagina per una revisione della decisione? Sei un amministratore di questo progetto e potresti esser considerato di più. Io a certi amministratori ho proposto 6 mesi di blocco a Giovanni per punizione ma la messa al bando di un valido collaboratore qual'è Giovanni è dannosa per questo progetto. Ho lanciato un appello pure qui. Ti avviso che in talk:Albert Kesselring#OT l'utente Piero Montesacro si permette di giudicare un mio commento senza motivo!!!! Amichevoli saluti.--PIO (talk) 14:31, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Teen Wolf
Hi, could you please explain how my edits to Teen Wolf were unconstructive? I assure you they were made in good faith. I added a source for the episode of Bo' Selecta! being mentioned, removed unnecessary information, and replaced some American words with their British alternatives (given how Bo' Selecta! is a British show). And I did provide an edit summary. Coop41 (talk) 14:54, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- It's perfectly fine, I know you're just trying to help. :) Coop41 (talk) 15:05, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
A request
Could you please enter the following in place of Adam Copeland's infobox:
{{Infobox Wrestler
|name=Adam Copeland
|names='''Edge'''<br />Adam Impact<ref>Copeland, Adam. ''Adam Copeland On Edge'' (p.55)</ref><br />Damon Stryker<br />Sexton Hardcastle<ref>Copeland, Adam. ''Adam Copeland On Edge'' (p.74)</ref>
|image=Adam Copeland.JPG<!-- Do not change the picture. This is a free use image, and free use images are favored on Wikipedia. -->
|image_size=150
|height=6 ft. 5 in. (196 cm)<!-- Please don't change the height or weight. These are the measures as officially stated and they should not be changed. --><ref name=wwebio/>
|weight=240 lb. (110 kg)<!-- Please don't change the height or weight. These are the measures as officially stated and they should not be changed. --><ref name=wwebio/>
|birth_date={{birth date and age|1973|10|30}}
|birth_place=[[Orangeville, Ontario]]<ref name="IGN">{{cite web|url=http://stars.ign.com/objects/142/14209482_biography.html|title=IGN: Edge (WWE) Biography|accessdate=2008-01-01|publisher=[[IGN]]}}</ref>
|resides=[[Tampa, Florida]]
|billed=[[Toronto]], [[Ontario]], [[Canada]]
|trainer=Ron Hutchison<ref name=wwebio/><br />Sweet Daddy Siki<ref name=wwebio/><br />[[Bret Hart|Bret]] and [[Stu Hart]]<br />[[Dory Funk, Jr.]]<br />[[Tom Prichard]]<br />[[Leo Burke]]
|debut= [[July 1]] [[1992]]<ref>Copeland, Adam. ''Adam Copeland On Edge'' (p.51)</ref>
|retired=
}}
Vandalism I can't deal with right now. Dlae│here 16:46, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you. Dlae
│here 16:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Warning of User:Reino Helismaa
How is this edit vandalism? Taemyr (talk) 17:52, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
help with engineering stub : template or from scratch
We are trying to add an inventor profile to your engineering stub but seem to be having some difficulties. If you can point us to a help article or message us with directions of how to do so that would be great. Kettleone (talk) 18:33, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
dairy product
Unforunately it appears that the IP 160.7.156.146 continues to vandalise Dairy Product, also under IP 160.7.155.158 and possibly others. Perhaps we could look at a stronger warning and or temporary ban. Cheers Halogenated (talk) 19:09, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
ETHIOPIAS NENXT TOP MODEL
I UNDERSTAND I MAY HAVE MADE A HONENST ERROR IN MY ATTEMPT TO CONTACT A USER BUT IT WAS JUST A SIMPLE MISTAKE,
I DID NOT VANDLAZE AND REWRITE AND CHANGE THE SUBJECT OUT OF SPITE
BUT YOU WERE NEEDLESSLY HARSH WITH YOUR WORDS Inseatd of being just a little bit more helpful
You have still not explained why ETHIOPIA'S NEXT TOP MODEL should not be included in Wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by Miss ethiopia (talk • contribs) 20:21, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
personal attack
Please stop personal attacks. this is not nice.--Area69 (talk) 20:29, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
whisper number article
why would you undo my last change to this article, but not undo the prior four changes by 24.182.143.16 even though they do not meet the 'rules' of wiki changes? 69.69.74.68 (talk) 20:41, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Yes you can help
Headline text
hello i wana be ur frend!!
Wow
|
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| What an amazing vandal fighting job. That definitely deserves some kind of recognition. STORMTRACKER 94 20:50, 24 January 2008 (UTC) |
Barnstar
|
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| It seems like every time I tried to do a vandal revert, you had already beat me to it. Great job! Jauerbackdude?/dude. 20:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC) |
*Ahem*
*Cough Cough* :P Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs)
- PS:You should consider making a best of this talk page subpage....really! Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 20:59, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- HELOOOOOOOOOO???????? Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 21:49, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
i don't get it
The picture was broken so I took it off. I don't see why that is vandalism.
I'm not vandalized Land Value Tax page
I'm not vandalizing Land Value Tax page.
Problems with implementing is a criticism. So it should go with criticisms. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.22.67.251 (talk) 21:19, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- You are leaving the article in an unusable state during your edits. Please use the "Show preview" button, sign your posts, use Edit Summaries, and create an account. Thanks! — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 21:23, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
vandalism
Hi snowolf, sorry I left for you a message at wrong place ( user page ). I was telling you about that person who blanked page and changed texts. Regards Samsam22 (talk) 21:50, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
97.84.219.124
You left 97.84.219.124 a message stating that they were blocked, but the block log shows nothing and their contributions only show two instances of vandalism and a single prior warning (from yourself) -- am I missing something or has this place changed drastically since my last round of heavy editing? --(FNM) (BANANA!) 22:02, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Odd... If I look at your logs, I can clearly see the IP being blocked and unblocked; however, if I view their logs, it shows up as being blank. Must be my strange combination of Ubuntu and a new account with Twinkle installed. --(FNM) (BANANA!) 22:09, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- 'Twas an honest mistake. Happens all the time. Cheers (I'll stop giving you the new messages bar now :P), --(FNM) (BANANA!) 22:11, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
No Problem
I understand many such edits may be vandalism-- These just weren't. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.252.162.226 (talk) 22:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
January 2008 - Talk:Albus Dumbledore page
Hi, the recent edit you made to Talk:Albus Dumbledore has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Snowolf How can I help? 21:56, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Snowolf - for your information, I archived a pair of discussion to the archives, and used an edit summary - see the diff. --T-dot ( Talk/contribs ) 22:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
"User's - not IPs"
Hang on, though...this page doesn't distinguish between the two. All users are users, whether they're logged in or IP users, surely...? Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 22:13, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- I appreciate that the page I've ref'd above is an essay, but this page isn't, and also doesn't distinguish...or am I missing something? Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 22:14, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Nu Breaks Page Needs Help
Please check your bot settings. I tried to repair the NuBreaks page and your bot auto reverted my change. Please take a look at the current page! It is by far one of the worst pages out there. It has clearly been vandalized and the bot that you are using to stop vandalism is preventing me from fixing the vandalized page. I suggest reverting to a previous version until the article can be re written or repaired.
Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.3.55.51 (talk • contribs) 22:13, 24 Jan 2008
Relying on Bots
Don't relay on Bots to do all your work. The bots that you are using may stop vandals but they also stop average people from using wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.3.55.51 (talk) 22:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- It appears that Snowolf replied on your talk page. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 22:36, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Digital barns and the stars that adorn them
|
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| You beat me at least three quarters of the time! Add this one to your sizable collection with my admiration. Kakofonous (talk) 22:48, 24 January 2008 (UTC) |
Smash Lab is Horrible
and the world must now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.252.71.239 (talk) 23:21, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
hello
iu am sorry, i was told by my frinds that wikipedia is ok to eddit~? i was just trying to be have fun but if it is ellegail to edit wikipedia i will stop i am sorry! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ctx7 (talk • contribs) 23:40, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Vandalism on your userpage
Hey Snowolf, it seems like you should protect your userpage with all the vandalism its been getting. Just thought you should know.--Sunny910910 (talk|Contributions) 23:42, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
My talk page
Thanks for reverting the vandalism under the Miranda Habeeb section on my talk page! SchfiftyThree 23:45, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Israeli judicial system article
Hello,
I've recently read the said article, and was overwhelmed by its lack of professionalism. The majority of the article is in fact rants about being a lawyer. It is entirely non-encyclopedic, and is based primarily on unsubstantiated anecdotes and personal opinions. That said, the pieces about the Labor Court and Military Courts show severe bias. The Labor courts in Israel do have a well-specified jurisdiction (that is actually presented in the article). The writer's opinion about the "mistake" of turning to these court is, again, an opinion - not a fact. The personal criticism of Justice Adler (who is actually notable for brokering the end of several major strikes in Israel) is obviously bias. And about the Military Courts - they should be mentioned of course - and criticised, but that is also done unprofessionally in the article.
Any way, I usually don't edit wikipedia pages, but this one was just screaming "EDIT ME!". Hope you'd reinstate my edits, and actually do some more deletions, so it won't look like some lawyer's personal blog.
Respectfully, Annonimous from Israel.
85.65.203.70 (talk) 00:09, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
revert?
Hi. I think this was a mistake on your part. Best, --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 00:45, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Jordan Hasay
What? I'm Jordan Hasay's #1 fan man, I know what I'm talking about :D! —Preceding unsigned comment added by B0bby flay (talk • contribs) 01:10, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Italian admins
Sai che pare che tu non sia l'unico admin italiano di en.wp? C'è anche User:Mushroom, admin da fine 2005. Non mi stupirei se ce ne fossero anche altri comunque.. --Jaqen (talk) 02:23, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
I wanted to know that should not there be a mention of the 1992 attack by muslim terorists on Karnak temple complex ? I guesss you have worked on this page. Jon Ascton (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 02:29, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia Weekly Episode 40
Wikipedia Weekly Episode 40 has been released!
.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2008/01/24/episode-40-wikipedias-genetic-makeup/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.
For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 05:38, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.
30K...
This is yet another complaint about your edit count: two more weeks at the same rate and you break into the top 100 contributors... You'll make a mockery of everyone if you do. AO hides under a rock, and admits defeat to the #1 vandal fighter in the world--undisputed. :P · AndonicO Hail! 14:12, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
You know...
The text in the page isn't appearing. In the sandbox I copied it, deleted the text, and pasted ot again. The text worked. I was simply going to do this for the whole page, but I guess I'm not welcome.LordJesseD (talk) 14:30, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Mistaken revert
Please take a look at your recent revert revert you made to Federal Employees Health Benefit Plan. The article was created using the wrong name for the federal program involved. I've created a new article under the correct name Federal Employees Health Benefits Program and copied _all_ of the text from the original article to the new one. The last step was to redirect the original, incorrectly titled article to the new one. That's what I tried to explain in shorthand form in my edit summary ("Redirect to article under the program's correct official name") That's also the step you just reverted. Please take a look. If you see anything inappropriate about this move, let's talk - but I think you'll agree that it was the correct move. If you have any question about the correct title, look at the website for the program ([7]). Thanks, EastTN (talk) 15:03, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
URL has been vandalized. Dalhousie Peer NOT www.saveport.ca
My apologies. Here is the URL for which I am reporting vandalism.
Wikipedia site: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_Dalhousie
Our Dalhousie Peer Magazine URL has been changed to www.saveport.ca
www.saveport.ca is a site in direct conflict with our mandate. THAT change is the vandalism. The original Dalhousie Peer Magazine URL was set up with: www.peer2000.com
It is Dalhousie Peer Magazine's URL that has been vandalized!
I respectfully request you search for whoever made that original Change and how they were able to do it without being charged with vandalism.
Please respond immediately. Wainmanl (talk) 15:13, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
wainmanl@sympatico.ca —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wainmanl (talk • contribs) 15:07, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Vandal?
I think my page has been vandalized. Could you keep an eye on my talk page and make sure that this doesn't happen again? If you know who's doing it, please block the user. Thanks!Dark Executioner (talk) 15:44, 25 January 2008 (UTC)Dark Executioner
AAA Life Insurance Company should NOT redirect to AAA Automotive Company
AAA Life Insurance Company should NOT redirect to AAA Automotive Company. Please remove the redirect. AAA Life Insurance Company and AAA are SEPARATE companies. I was not vandalizing the page but rather correcting it. Please remove the redirect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mktgupdate (talk • contribs) 21:05, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Simon Willard
Hi, Snowolf. I have been the same user Andres Arce, previously. I am trying to fix the disaster which have happened with my old article. I didn't want to vandalize the wikipedia. Glad to message you... 2008ana (talk) 21:07, 25 January 2008 (UTC)2008ana p.d.: is it possible that i might continue with my clean up? if not it will be fine, don't worry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2008ana (talk • contribs) 21:09, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
ok, Snowolf, i will do that from now on. tx for replying so fast. glad to message you.2008ana (talk) 21:19, 25 January 2008 (UTC)2008ana
by the way, keep up fighting vandalism ! 2008ana (talk) 21:24, 25 January 2008 (UTC)2008ana
the funny part was that i tried to follow the complicated instructions, to revert the first reversion of my edition but i got lost... glad to message you.2008ana (talk) 21:30, 25 January 2008 (UTC)2008ana
i wasn't vandalizing, i was ordering the information (which had been provided originally by me). It wasn't my intention. I won't edit that page again, I promise. 2008ana (talk) 23:03, 25 January 2008 (UTC)2008ana
ok... i forgive you with the condition that you keep up fighting vandalism !!! long life wikipedia... glad to message you ...2008ana (talk) 23:10, 25 January 2008 (UTC)2008ana (pd. i assume that i can finish with those links... i'll await your approval.
Get a Life
And stay out of mine. Iloveamerica2much (talk) 21:17, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Hmm... Maybe I was wrong. Sorry and all that, I completely overreacted. Iloveamerica2much (talk) 21:24, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
I need a hand here. Two users are adding strange unsourced/unverifiable content to this article, one of which is probably a sockpuppet of the other; see Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Chimpywiki. I'm in danger of violating 3RR over this one, and they seem to have the upper hand in this respect as they are editing the article as two users to my one, as it were. Could you please have a look at the article history and take action if you feel the same way? Many thanks. haz (talk) 22:28, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Lupin's Tool
Probably a silly question with a simple answer. I'd like to try Lupin's Tool, but when I go to see my monobook.js file (which I have never touched before), I get the following message:
"If a message on your talk page led you here, please be wary of who left it. The code below could contain malicious content capable of compromising your account; if your account appears to be compromised, it will be blocked. If you are unsure whether the code is safe, you can ask at the appropriate village pump."
and no code to see or edit whatsoever.
This happens in both Firefox 2.0, IE 6 and IE 7. Any pointers as to what to do/how to edit and save a monobook.js file are appreciated. -- Alexf42 22:35, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
No Drama
I meant that for some strange reason the text wasn't showing up on the page, even though it had already been typed in the editing section. If that makes sense. I accept your apology whole heartdly, thanks for saying it. It's good we have people like you on here to fight vandalisim, it's terrible what some people do.LordJesseD (talk) 23:40, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Stratics Page
Heya, got a message from you regarding the reverts I did on Stratics. My reverts were to remove vandalism on the article, FYI. User: Missed —Preceding comment was added at 23:41, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Burnout Paradise at Wikia
What's up! We have a new Burnout Paradise wiki at Wikia, and I wanted to invite you to share your knowledge with us on a whole wiki dedicated to the game. If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Cheers. JoeLay (talk) 00:12, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- I'm simply inviting people who have edited the Burnout Paradise article (thus showing interest in the game) to also edit the Burnout Paradise wiki at Wikia. I just got done reading every Wikipedia policy page I could find, and did not see anything that prohibits what I am doing. If there IS a pre-existing written policy that does prohibit it, point me to the page that it appears on, and I will no longer invite people to share their knowledge about specific games at another wiki. Until then, I intend to continue with the invitations. JoeLay (talk) 00:53, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Hope you don't mind.
[8] Trying to help! :) Jmlk17 00:18, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Vandalism
I don't know if you've noticed, but there's an extraordinarily large "lol" at the top of this page. You do say not to revert vandalism... Keep up the good work :-) Sam Korn (smoddy) 00:28, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- I've removed it, thanks :) Snowolf How can I help? 12:34, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
What?
Uh, what did I do wrong? I only thought that there was something that the user blanked on his page, and I got suspicious. I also made some filler on the page because it looked blank, and heck, it was. I wanted it to at least have an intro. Kimera Kat (talk) 00:50, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
NPWatcher
Hi Snowolf
I have just added my user name to NPW (self-approval as indicated). I downloaded the program and it requests userid/pwd. What is not clear to me at this point is how to set the initial password and the manual is no help on this issue. Thanks for your attention (you can respond here as I'll be watching the page for a while). Thanks! -- Alexf42 03:52, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Never mind. I figured it out. Silly me. That's what happens when you work before a first cup of coffee. :) -- Alexf42 04:02, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Editing!
Hi Snowwolf! I just wanted you to know that I edited the Fergie Page because somebody edited it before and added a text saying "I'm Fergie and I love you" and stuff like that, and he/she added a link to a porn site. Just deleted everything so someone could replace it with the original. Thanks for doing it! Sinnec (talk) 13:33, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
AMFV
Sorry about that, I thought it would make sense to mention all the year numbers that appear in the game, as all the other instances have both the number of years into the future and the C.E. year number. -- 85.183.214.12 (talk) 13:20, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Germanic peoples - Kind warning from you
Thank you for your warning, however you are too late. I already written to Snowballa68, that I wouldn't revert further vandalism, in order to avoid an edit war (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Snowballa68) - but none-the-less thank you :) Dylansmrjones (talk) 16:07, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for protecting Daniel Boone
Thanks for changing the protection level for Daniel Boone to semi-protection. It seems if an article becomes featured, it's vandalized. I wonder if Wikipedia ought to have a standard policy that featured articles are protected for a day or two? What do you think? Wakedream (talk) 18:30, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Don't mean to start a wheel-war, but are you aware of Wikipedia:Main Page featured article protection? -MBK004 19:00, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- I won't remove the semi protection, but I will restore the full move protection which is applied to all main page FAs. -MBK004 19:07, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
My peer review request
I apologize, I did not mean to spam several users with improper requests, but I did want feedback. I'm thinking maybe you could suggest the proper place to look for 3rd party feedback? What are the proper channels? I support your contributions in anti-vandalism, which brings me to my next question. How did you know I sent several messages to different peer review users? That was cool. :)--Sparkygravity (talk) 19:07, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Replied here. · AndonicO Hail! 19:51, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Hirsuties papillaris genitalis
You certainly seem attached to the three pictures of a penis on the Hirsuties papillaris genitalis page. Every time I get rid of these pictures FOR PERFECTLY LEGITIMATE REASONS you revert the page.
The page has some links at the the bottom for people who want to see images, but I don't think it's necessary for viewers to be bombarded with THREE graphic pictures when they read this article.
Please, I'm begging you, can you just explain your reasons before you revert this article?
68.10.173.234 (talk) 19:57, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Yngwie Malmsteen
Can you explain me, please, why my edit should be uncostructive? I've just optimized the section creating an apposite page for the lineups table, undoubtly too long if located in the page of the biography. What's the point? Should I leave an explanation on the edit summary every time I edit a page? Thanks --Blues 1911 (talk) 20:25, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Jessica Lynch
you keep that stuff delted please because there is no point to having it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.182.193.22 (talk) 23:39, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
It is the truth, and if you don't like it, go suck a tree branch! —Preceding unsigned comment added by KiaChislett (talk • contribs) 00:43, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
I didn't mean to be a vandal
Here is my story.
I created a whole new article on classical hamiltonian quaternions.
The history of this article was that it grew and grew inside of quaternions, until it started to have more section headings under item 10.1 than the entire rest of the article.
Section five of the article is extreamly problematic.
It might be about a different topic.
So I cut it and paisted it into the talk page.
So I was cutting a section of an article that I myself had typed, because when we cut the history section in quaternions back down to a better older version and took the text from the current to long version and put it in another article.
Read the top of the article about what it is about.
See how section five does not belong there?
Or should it. I read it again, and I sort of like it. Maybe it does still belong but just needs a lot of work. What if it is the one part that can't be made to meet wiki standards?
What would have been the proper procedure for deleting it? Rather moving it to a different page and deleting it from classical quaternions?
Please don't get me in trouble for being a vandal
Hobojaks (talk) 03:16, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
I read a little bit more about what constitutes vandalism. By definition it constitutes a deliberate act. You also accused my of being "unconstructive". I admit that I have a lot to learn about the rules of wikipedia. But I hope my attempts to contribute to the history of quaternions by now dividing the subject it two parts will no longer be viewed as "vandalism".
Snowolf, if you would like to help us with the development of the history of quaternions you are more than Welcome. However your accusations of vandalism with out participation in the discussion seem unreasonable.
Hobojaks (talk) 22:06, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Editing "Muhammad" page
Hello,
I have just edited "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad" to remove the pictures of Muhammad, the messenger of ALLAH as displaying such images are offensive to Muslims.
May I know why did you report the change (removal of the images) as constituting vandalism?
Thanks in advance.
Norton gates (talk) 14:29, 27 January 2008 (UTC)norton_gates
Editing "Muhammad" page Cont.
Hello,
1. Thanks for the reply.
2. What are the required, needed, and allowed steps to get these images removed from the page?
Thanks in advance.
Norton gates (talk) 14:39, 27 January 2008 (UTC)norton_gates
My Rfa
My effort to regain adminship was unsuccessful, and I'll do what I can to ensure your opinion of my suitability for adminship improves. Thank you for taking some time out of your day to voice your opinion.--MONGO 19:47, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I've decided to unblock Anthony's account per this request. Please let me know if you have any objections. Regards, ˉˉanetode╦╩ 06:48, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Report of vandalism
This revision of civilization was vandalism! http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Civilization&diff=186984743&oldid=186899011. It was fixed by User:VoABot_II. Since it was fixed by a bot rather than a person, I thought I'd report the vandalism, since this IP user may become more subtle and avoid detection in the future.--Sparkygravity (talk) 10:38, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Stratics revisited
the removal of the reference section was because that material was linked to a recent controversies section listed on the page. said "recent controversies" is the vandalism i have been attempting to remove and you've been reverting back to. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Missed (talk • contribs) 18:31, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
vandal
hey snowolf,
how's it going?
about a week ago you suspended user 192.91.173.42, right now he/she is vandalizing the same article , but with a different ip , this time its 192.35.35.34....
snowolf if you check both IPs you 'll find out that it's the same person from Washington DC,
the user who keeps vandalizing my entry, does not cite any proof or any reference
the article is
"ya libnan"
and snowolf you could go to ya libna's website...and you'll find out that every article...says "according to a relaibe source...according to this reliable source...according to that reliable sources...
the sources are always not named...and this vandal claims they are sourced even htough he provides no reference to proove it...
sincerely, G. 70.80.188.30 70.80.188.30 (talk) 18:46, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Hurry up?
What do you mean you need to hurry up? You've got over 50% more edits than I do. :P · AndonicO Hail! 18:53, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey you made a mistake
I have not modifice deforesestation my only contributions are with pictures and with Honduras because I live in Honduras and I know the laws. I destroy the "no pasaran" motto because we dont use it, and modifide from 4 years to 7 in the time of the suprem cort.
here is your message
Hi, the recent edit you made to Deforestation has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Snowolf How can I help? 23:54, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
--Luis2492 (talk) 21:55, 29 January 2008 (UTC)--Luis2492 (talk) 21:55, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Luis Argenal 2008₣
SNOW PLEASE SIGN MY AUTOGRAPHS PAGE
Click my name then click autographs —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaogier (talk • contribs) 16:19, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
What the hell do you know
What the hell do you know, you don't even live in Irwin, PA, I know who lives there you DON'T. The Census is wrong and you use that as a reference? It's my town and I can't even edit in what I know? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.171.48.66 (talk) 18:27, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
New Page patrol
Howdy, my wife and I have been doing new page patrol and wanted to check out the NPWatcher tool. We left our names at User:Martinp23/NPWatcher/Checkpage a day or two ago, and thought we might as well poke you. Your User:Snowolf/Admin tools page is amazing, especially the warn templates and the "live" summaries. The backlog is either inspiring or frightening, but I guess there's plenty to do. JackSchmidt (talk) 02:54, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 5 | 28 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 04:21, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Excuse me but your comment on my input onto the condom section was extremely offensive. I put a alot of effort into making a useful contribution adding real world angles to the information page. How valid is this internet site if people simply choose the information put forward, i realise it must be moderated but who has the right to decide what is acceptable. My information is just as valid as the next.
Thank you for your time and i leave deeply offended and in dispair of the state of this once great site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.207.227.119 (talk • contribs) 22:24, 25 Jan 2008
Excuse me but your comment on my input onto the condom section was extremely offensive. I put a alot of effort into making a useful contribution adding real world angles to the information page. How valid is this internet site if people simply choose the information put forward, i realise it must be moderated but who has the right to decide what is acceptable. My information is just as valid as the next.
Thank you for your time and i leave deeply offended and in dispair of the state of this once great site.
Also the rubber johny is used in many schools across the world as a balloon. One blows up the johny with the mouth like a balloon, or you can put it over your head and blow through your nose. This is often done to the obese person in the class as they look much like a pig when blowing through their nose.If a rubber john is used (blown up many times) it gets full of saliva, this looks much like gook (A.K.A Semen, cum, white magic, jizz, the fuzz, bernard o'donahan, john of arc, bum fun, sea-monkeys, spearinajar, etc) which can often be an unwanted sight when the john has been discarded as it looks as if sexual humpy dump has occured and the gook (A.K.A Hilary Clinton, white gold, wet dream, spokey dokies, spunk and all of the mentioned above) Many beleive the Johnny defines the man, the phrase manners maketh the man possibly originated from the idea of a Johnny being an important peice of human society.Some also beleive the phrase rubber johhny came from the Swedish architect (Yohof Lehnsjohn) who made his name selling fingers from a 'marigold' glove and in some cases elastic bands, as a condom when little were available. The buyers of the condom would simply call it a john or rubber johny after Yohof's second name. Although many disputes rage over the origin of the condom as examples of primitive contraception have been found as early as Egyptian periods.(HF)
I beleive this validates much un heard information. Is this not a info sharing site. I would be intersted in the amount of people who support this comment.
Respectful correction
Dear Snowolf,
thank you for your friendly guidance; in order to reciprocate, I feel I owe you an explanation: My recent alteration was in no way an attempt at vandalism or misguided sandplay, as it were; I felt that given the limited size of the "Ferrer (surname)" entry, it wold actually be more beneficial to users if it were reinstated to its original position, i.e. s.v. "Ferrer", whence it was transformed into a separate subpage in December, 2007. I still believe reinserting the information under "Ferrer" would be beneficial; naturally, however, I bow to your experience,if you continue to maintain that its present position is preferable.
Kind regards,
StuartStewart —Preceding unsigned comment added by StuartStewart (talk • contribs) 22:27, 25 Jan 2008
Funny Fumble
Sorry if I'm writing this wrong but I;m a newbee so forgive me anyway. I created Nascar crashes and once I saw the speedy delete message I decided to blank the page . I hope you understand that you gave me a warning for blanking my own page. Please forgive me and I hope you fix your mistake Thank You. - Funny Fumble —Preceding unsigned comment added by Funnyfumble5 (talk • contribs) 23:48, 25 Jan 2008
hi, please read this its important
FUCK YOU, BITCH! I can do whatever i want, and there is nothing you can do to stop me. you are without doubt the most annoying piece of shit i have ever even heard of. you are a flat out embarrasment to humankind. do the world a favour and kill yourself, ok? the world will be a better place without you. or if you can't bring yourself to do it, get someone else to do it, see if i care. you are a pathetic worm. go and burn in hell. on second thought, hell is too good for you. go to the darkest, most desolate pits of the universe and stay there in agony. you are a despondently hopeless worm who can do nothing but annoy people. even your mother probably wants to kill or maim you in some way.
BURN IN HELL, SNOWOLF!!!
thank you, and have a painfull death —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.157.110.73 (talk • contribs) 18:44, 30 Jan 2008
What The?
Who the golden fishcake are you? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.195.218.131 (talk • contribs) 18:55, 30 Jan 2008
The February 2008 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is ready! Dr. Cash (talk) 05:18, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||
