Jump to content

User talk:Skyraider1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Good luck, and have fun. FWIW, Bzuk (talk) 01:03, 21 June 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Season's tidings!

[edit]

To you and yours, Have a Merry ______ (fill in the blank) and Happy New Year! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 01:54, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pardon tardiness

[edit]

Pardon my late response to your act of kindness. I've been so caught up in editing, I just blanked out on it. Well, belated sincere Thank you FOX 52 (talk) 05:45, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

I just want to thank you for your modifications on Sikorsky H-34, my English is rusted... lol --Friday83260 (On discute ?) 06:30, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


About Ion Thruster Edit

[edit]

Hi, there I have seen you removed an edit about the propulsive efficiency for the Ion thruster which I posted a few weeks ago (I was an anonymous user then). Maybe my edit is not perfect, however the paragraph in this article is completely irrelevant (you can also look at the talk section, somebody else noted it), for somebody with a degree in physics there is no such thing as a "vehicle velocity", velocity is always relative to a reference. The formulas used within the paragraph are formulas which are derived for propulsive efficiency within an athmosphere (in an athmosphere it is common practice to name vehicle velocity its velocity relative to the athmosphere). In a vaccum (in space) this formula is no longer valid, and Ion thrusters are used almost exclusively in space (due to their small thrusts).

Maybe you may think that I do not have any reliable sources (altough some good physics books could do), but then remove this propulsive efficiency paragraph which has really nothing to do in this article then. Sjaure (talk) 12:55, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Solar Dynamics Observatory

[edit]

Hi, Skyraider1, I noticed your edit. To explain what I did: the Camilla the Chicken page refers to "Camilla", hence my edit. In the meantime I changed the link on the page to Camilla Corona. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 04:57, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation, Lotje- that makes a little more sense now. Out of context, I was having a difficult time understanding the connection between a chicken (didn't realize SDO had any sort of rubber chicken mascot) and a solar observatory- I almost didn't realize your edit was in good faith. Changing the link on the page to Camilla Corona, as you did, is probably more useful to a reader in the long run anyway. Thanks again for the note. Cheers! Skyraider1 (talk) 10:58, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plasma. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

bruh

[edit]

Just stop. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lolgainz (talk • contribs) 15:58, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tallapoosa F-105s

[edit]

Don't know how to get you info. However there are two F105 thunderbolts in Tallapoosa GA in the veterans park. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.172.57.173 (talk) 20:40, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Season's Greetings

[edit]
File:Xmas Ornament.jpg

To You and Yours!

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 14:57, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Skyraider1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merry, merry!

[edit]

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 21:37, 26 December 2016 (UTC) [reply]

A kitten for you!

[edit]

Greetings!

Thanks for your interest! I do not believe in edit wars either, but I also think that there should be more reason given for the deletion of a contribution. The goal of the Second Life Museum of Nuclear Warfare is actually to expand the use of virtual worlds as an educational tool, and it is my hope that virtual exhibits will someday be treated with the same respect as real life ones. I welcome further discussion, and if you want to visit the museum, I invite you to do so. Thanks!! :)

Otaku155 (talk) 19:17, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. The civility is much appreciated, Otaku155. We've exchanged perspectives- that's all I intended to accomplish at this point. I would ask one more thing: review and be careful of WP:NOTPROMO- seems you have a personal interest in this Second Life Museum project, which could be at odds with this guideline. Use caution. Cheers! Skyraider1 (talk) 22:24, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have read that VERY carefully lol; I will simply state that as long as no money is being made, there is no promotion. Neither I, nor the museum, have anything to gain simply from being mentioned on wiki, and all posts are factual. Thanks so much for your help :) Otaku155 (talk) 23:30, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

USNS Mercy (T-AH-19)

[edit]

Naval auxiliaries are in non-commissioned service, distinctly seperate from commissioned warship. Being non-commissioned they carry the hull prefix USNS as opposed to commissioned USS. Coffee Atoms (talk) 19:50, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I did not realize that, Coffee Atoms. My mistake- thank you for correcting. Cheers! Skyraider1 (talk) 19:55, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Skyraider1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Season's Greetings

[edit]

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 00:31, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Bzuk! Apologies for the late reply, have not been active lately. Stay warm! Skyraider1 (talk) 02:30, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Response to your enquiry

[edit]

Skyraider1, Not sure how to message you (I've spent 15 minutes trying to figure it out!!), but regarding your enquiry to me: "I noticed you recently updated some information in the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment article, but without providing an updated source. Adding your source to the information you updated will help keep the article in line with Wikipedia's verifiability policy" which concerns the reentry of the Grace 2 satellite and the prediction of upcoming reentry of Grace 1. Thanks, I'd actually thought of that when I submitted the edit. Problem is accessing that info requires a user name and password at https://www.space-track.org/auth/login so wouldn't do anyone any good unless they have an account with Space-Track. Would you suggest I cite that now? Eventually reentries will appear here: http://www.aerospace.org/cords/reentry-predictions/upcoming-reentries-2-2/ which is a non-restricted site (no password required) or finally here under 2018: http://www.aerospace.org/cords/reentry-predictions/past-reentries/ which I can cite once they show up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xapie128 (talk • contribs) 21:00, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply, Xapie128. Looks like another editor already took care of updating the sources in that article, so no worries. I'm not really sure either on how to cite a source that requires a login, good question. If I figure it out I'll get back to you. Cheers! Skyraider1 (talk) 21:56, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Grace 2 reentry & Space-Track

[edit]

I see whoever did cite Space-Track, and of course clicking that link asks for a login. Xapie128 (talk) 23:43, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Xapie128, I looked around at Wikipedia's guidelines, and there's a short paragraph about Access to sources. Short answer: even if a log-in is required, a site like that could be used as a source. I don't have an account on Space-Track, but if it seems to follow the rest of the WP:RS guidelines, then no issue using it. So feel free to use it as a source in the future. Hope that helps! Cheers! Skyraider1 (talk) 02:56, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Skyraider1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiEagle - January 2022

[edit]
The WikiEagle
The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter
Volume I — Issue 1
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Announcements
  • After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name The WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its sub-projects. If you wish to continue receiving The WikiEagle, you can add your username to the mailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please let us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged.
  • On 16 December, an RfC was closed which determined theaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which is cited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue.
  • Luft46.com has been added to the list of problematic sources after this discussion.
  • The Jim Lovell article was promoted to Featured Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Hawkeye7.
  • The Raymond Hesselyn article was promoted to Good Article status on 4 December after being nominated by Zawed.
  • The Supermarine Sea King article was promoted to Good Article status on 22 December after being nominated by Amitchell125.
  • The William Hodgson (RAF officer) article was promoted to Good Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Zawed.
Members

New Members

Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921.

Closed Discussions

Featured Article assessment

Good Article assessment

Deletion

Requested moves

Article Statistics
This data reflects values from DMY.
Aviation pages by quality
Quality
Total
FA 142
FL 15
A 56
GA 505
B 4,573
C 11,878
Start 15,082
Stub 18,754
List 2,539
Category 11,638
Disambig 653
File 2,713
Portal 629
Project 89
Redirect 1,518
Template 2,489
NA 66
Assessed 73,339
Unassessed 1
Total 73,340
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 251,807 Ω = 4.92
New/Ongoing Discussions

On The Main Page

Did you know...

Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list.
Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Skyraider1&oldid=1139388539"