User talk:SimonP/Archive 12
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:SimonP. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 |
Nomination of List of Prime Ministers of Canada by residence for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Prime Ministers of Canada by residence is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Prime Ministers of Canada by residence until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 14:17, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
List of most populous nations by 2025 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of most populous nations by 2025. Since you had some involvement with the List of most populous nations by 2025 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Florian Blaschke (talk) 02:44, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, SimonP. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Coins and Coin Collecting listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Coins and Coin Collecting. Since you had some involvement with the Coins and Coin Collecting redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 17:52, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
États-Unis d'Amérique listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect États-Unis d'Amérique. Since you had some involvement with the États-Unis d'Amérique redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:20, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Cecil Foster for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cecil Foster is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cecil Foster until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Szzuk (talk) 16:11, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
 | |
| Ten years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:10, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
New mailing list for Wikimedia Canada
Good day, this message is to inform you that Wikimedia Canada has created a new mailing list operated by Mailman. This mailing list is for all discussions related to the Wikimedia movement in Canada, in both English and French. Announcements from Wikimedia Canada will always be bilingual, but you are welcomed to discuss in any language of your choice. The old google group will be abandoned. To join this mailing list, please go to [1]. To send messages to the list, write to general(at)discussions.wikimedia.ca. Also, please forward this message to anybody who may be interested. Thank you and do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. JP Béland (WMCA) (talk) 13:41, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 special circular
 |
Administrators must secure their accounts
The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.
|
This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:40, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.
For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Nomination for merging of Template:Periods of the History of Europe
Template:Periods of the History of Europe has been nominated for merging with Template:History of Europe. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 23:40, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Category:Mage Knight has been nominated for discussion
Category:Mage Knight, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:02, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of John Beck (politician) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Beck (politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Beck (politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 15:52, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
Pen and Ink listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pen and Ink. Since you had some involvement with the Pen and Ink redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 06:52, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
FYI Notification concerning an article you originated
I am questioning whether the article Glenn Brooks meets general notability guidelines and have tagged the article along with a talk page section for discussion. Thank you. Ward20 (talk) 16:15, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Mitch Owens for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mitch Owens is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitch Owens until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:06, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Rick Chiarelli for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rick Chiarelli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Chiarelli until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rob (talk) 15:12, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
The article Broadview Lofts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable warehouse to loft condominium conversion. Almost all references on Internet are run-of-the-mill real estate listings or other ads.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alaney2k (talk) 14:59, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
"Center Line" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Center Line. Since you had some involvement with the Center Line redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. John from Idegon (talk) 04:32, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Wikimedian in Residence dates
Hi, The wikidata item Simon Pulsifer (Q7519593) lists you as a Wikimediain in Residence, however you're not listed on this table. I'm creating a wikkidata-based automated table (in progress). Would you be able to update the qualifiers of your WiR position in wikidata? T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 21:43, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, sorry to bother you again on this. Could I confirm whether you were a Wikimediain in residence at some point? I'm trying to make sure Wikidata is up to date on them. Thanks! T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 06:43, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
"Sewing and Tailoring" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sewing and Tailoring. Since you had some involvement with the Sewing and Tailoring redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:32, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
The article Richard Cumyn has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Anarchyte (talk | work) 09:36, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Watcher (Buffy the Vampire Slayer) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Watcher (Buffy the Vampire Slayer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Watcher (Buffy the Vampire Slayer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – sgeureka t•c 07:35, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Possible example on Stable sorting
Would you be interested giving opinions or suggestions on a stable sorting example page I'm constructing. A first draft is found at Talk:Sorting_algorithm#How_is_this_stable_sort_example?
Also a newer, evolving, example is found in my sandbox at: User:Lent/sandbox .
And out of curiosity, did you know that a Shift-click on a Wikipedia sortable table column does a secondary sort?
Thanks!--Lent (talk) 11:36, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
"Vigennial" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Vigennial. Since you had some involvement with the Vigennial redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 23:25, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
"Progressive Conservative Parrty" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Progressive Conservative Parrty. Since you had some involvement with the Progressive Conservative Parrty redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC678 03:20, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
COVID general sanctions alert
Please carefully read this information:
A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
The specific details of these sanctions are described here.
Kautilya3 (talk) 06:20, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Albert Street (Ottawa) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Albert Street (Ottawa) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albert Street (Ottawa) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 00:05, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Booth Street for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Booth Street is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Booth Street until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:28, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
"The Lion King (movie)" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The Lion King (movie). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 17#The Lion King (movie) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TheAwesomeHwyh 17:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Historical drama, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The General. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:49, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Wikipedian in Residence?
Hi Simon! I'm trying to normalize Wikidata boxes on Wikipedians in Residence and was wondering if you could share a link about your work as a WiR where I can learn more about the dates and the type of job you did? --Silva Selva (talk) 18:11, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for your quick answer! Your Wikidata entity is now updated :) , have a great day! --Silva Selva (talk) 01:40, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Your Metro Map
Your map at 
is missing titles for two ward: York-Humber and York-Eglinton. Would you be able to fix this? 45.72.204.218 (talk) 00:02, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Susan Ioannou for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Susan Ioannou is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Ioannou until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Geoff | Who, me? 15:38, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Nomination for merging of Template:Middle Ages wide 2
Template:Middle Ages wide 2 has been nominated for merging with Template:Middle Ages. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Aza24 (talk) 01:00, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Category:Noon Universe has been nominated for merging to Category:Noon Universe novels
Category:Noon Universe has been nominated for merging to Category:Noon Universe novels. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 16:57, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 6
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:45, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
"35,000 BC" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 35,000 BC. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 9#35,000 BC until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Interstellarity (talk) 19:39, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
"12,000 BC" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 12,000 BC. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 9#12,000 BC until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Interstellarity (talk) 19:39, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I had to remove your PROD on the above article as it has already been through AfD. If you think it should be deleted, please do a WP:AfD. Spiderone 10:50, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Not important enough to be in history ?
It is actually quite important because what was areas of Southern Egypt today was a part of Northern Nubia, a section of it became part of Egypt because of the conquest of Ptolemy II Philadelphus. What is Nubia today is in Southern Egypt and North Sudan. The conquest played a role in absorbing Nubia as part of Egypt.
The Greek Ptolemaic Kingdom under Ptolemy II Philadelphus invaded Nubia in 275 BC and annexed the northern twelve miles of this territory, subsequently known as the Dodekaschoinos ('twelve-mile land').
I didn't add this next to it The conquest was publicly celebrated in the panegyric court poetry of Theocritus and by the erection of a long list of Nubian districts at the Temple of Isis at Philae, near Syene. The region's gold production was a key contributor to the prosperity and power of the Ptolemaic empire in the third century BC.
The other part " Throughout the 160s and 150s BC, Ptolemy VI reasserted Ptolemaic control over the northern part of Nubia. "
I will also add this next to it. "This achievement is heavily advertised at the Temple of Isis at Philae, which was granted the tax revenues of the Dodecaschoenus region in 157 BC. Decorations on the first pylon of the Temple of Isis at Philae emphasise the Ptolemaic claim to rule the whole of Nubia. The aforementioned inscription regarding the priests of Mandulis shows that some Nubian leaders at least were paying tribute to the Ptolemaic treasury in this period."
Perharps is too long?
I decided I will also mention the Romans who also had controlled of Egypts lower Nubia Triakontaschoinos. I COULD MAKE IT MUCH SHORTER. Like just mentioning the Greeks and Roman control of Triakontaschoinos and later being returned back to Nubia control. The point is I want to mention the Greeks and Romans had control of Nubia. --Vamlos (talk) 11:58, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
"Child Welfare" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Child Welfare. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 25#Child Welfare until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 03:30, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Crad Kilodney
Hi, as the article creator, I wondered if you had a source for the birthdate of Crad Kilodney? The birthdate was June 1, 1948, but another editor has changed it to February 13, 1948. I did some research, but none of the online bios for Kilodney mentioned his birthdate. If you can confirm June 1, you can correct the Wikipedia article yourself or let me know and I will correct it. thanks — Epinoia (talk) 15:33, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Mick Burrs has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Noah 💬 17:50, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Screeno, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bingo.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from InnoPath Software, which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial. Proposed deletion is not for controversial deletions. For this reason, proposed deletion is disallowed on articles that have previously been de-prodded, even by the page's creator, or which have previously been listed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{proposed deletion}} template back to the article, but feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! —KuyaBriBriTalk 01:55, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Category:Heads of the Ramakrishna Mission has been nominated for merging
Category:Heads of the Ramakrishna Mission has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:50, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
This page is still not deleted , someone created again !!!!!!!!!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rahul_Easwar — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.201.195.91 (talk) 15:33, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
The article Quirks & Quarks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Does not meet WP:GNG. The host appears to be notable, but independently the podcast/radio program is not.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TipsyElephant (talk) 15:36, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Kaliganga River
Hi Simon. You seem to have forgotten to fill in the name of a river here. I am an editor on the Dutch Wikipedia, but I just happened to pass by. All the best. ErikvanB (talk) 14:43, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
- Have revised the text. ErikvanB (talk) 12:07, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
"A. Peters" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect A. Peters. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 6#A. Peters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Lennart97 (talk) 11:27, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of List of top international rankings by country for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of top international rankings by country until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 14:41, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Grand Harbour (Toronto) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grand Harbour (Toronto), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Harbour (Toronto) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of John Doyle (critic) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Doyle (critic) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl! (talk) 05:33, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Astronomy planet
Hi! I've nominated for deletion Astronomy Mercury, Astronomy Venus and all the other ten or so redirects with this format, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 8#Astronomy Mercury. – Uanfala (talk) 17:00, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
"Harold the Simple" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Harold the Simple. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 15#Harold the Simple until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:25, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
How we will see unregistered users
Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. /Johan (WMF)
18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Gothic Revival architecture in Canada
Hello – Way back in December 2006 you created the Gothic Revival architecture in Canada article and it has held up well since then. But reading through now I notice the illustration of Commerce Court North that you captioned "a Beaux-Arts building with Gothic Revival elements". Where does that come from? The article on Commerce Court more appropriately describes the style as Art Deco, and the historicizing elements are Romanesque rather than Gothic. Is this just a mistake, or is there a deeper justification? – Justinbb (talk) 03:00, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- Good question. Most of that article is based on Kalman's history of Canadian architecture, so a chance it could be found there, but either way I don't think that is a correct description for the building and it should be removed as an example. - SimonP (talk) 03:42, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
"Clearstor(e)y" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Clearstor(e)y and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 25#Clearstor(e)y until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 18:13, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
New administrator activity requirement
The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
- Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
- Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Category:City councillors has been nominated for renaming
Category:City councillors has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 09:59, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
The article Cornelia Hoogland has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ploni (talk) 13:14, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
The article Under One Roof (2002 TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unsourced since forever. No proof that episodes were unaired. No sources found
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:30, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of John R. Williams (historian) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John R. Williams (historian) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:29, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Matthew 5:9 Citation
Hello I noticed you contributed to a topic regarding Matthew 5:9 here’s the link: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_5:9 There’s a passage in the article that reads: “Martin Luther and other early Protestant translators of the Bible preferred the translation "children of God," because they wanted to avoid any confusion as to whether Jesus was the only Son of God. "Sons of God" is, however, the more accurate translation and is used by most modern Bible translations” I was wondering if I could get a citation for this quote as I’m writing a paper and it heavily depends on this being proven. I looked at the references and I do not believe it is listed. If you could update the Wiki page that would be greatly appreciated! Thank you! 2607:9880:3578:92:C10F:ECC4:DBD0:2DF6 (talk) 04:15, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Avalon (webcomic) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avalon (webcomic) (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:32, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Category:The Championships, Wimbledon has been nominated for renaming
Category:The Championships, Wimbledon has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ApprenticeWiki work04:09, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Truevision3D deprod
Hi, I removed a proposed deletion you placed on the Truevision3D article, because there was previous prod/deprod back in June 2022. No opinion on notability. An AfD is the right way to go in this case. Pavlor (talk) 08:03, 14 July 2022 (UTC)