User talk:SibTower1987

Welcome!

Hello, SibTower1987, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 01:50, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This Is Me (Keala Settle song)

Please stop changing the template to the full version rather than for the 2010s decade; it is unnecessarily large, not relevant to the page overall, and you were reverted already. All the previous winners from past decades have nothing to do with this song specifically. If you disagree, take it to the talk page, or better yet, to avoid further disagreements and reverts, stop making wide-ranging changes to templates at all. Since they display on quite a number of pages, you're bound to run into opposition. Ss112 03:38, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Actor in a Short Form Comedy or Drama Series

Template:Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Actor in a Short Form Comedy or Drama Series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 11:52, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Actress in a Short Form Comedy or Drama Series

Template:Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Actress in a Short Form Comedy or Drama Series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 11:52, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decades in navboxes.

Please do not split the navboxes by decades. This system was deprecated long ago. A decade split forces the navbox to be a certain height, rather than let the navbox find its own size. A split in this way is arbitrary and each entry has the year by it anyway. Splits should only be made if the navbox gets out of hand - when that has happened (usually if there are more than 50-75 entries), we have generally split into groups of 25, or by using a natural split, like in {{BAFTA Award for Best Actor in a Leading Role}}. Massive unilateral overhauls like the ones you have been making should be discussed first. --wooden superman 11:55, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Variety Talk Series

Template:Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Variety Talk Series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 12:29, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

I do not understand why you have changed various templates to be identical to {{DramaDesk LightingDesign}}, {{DramaDesk CostumeDesign}}, and {{DramaDesk Lyrics}}.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:46, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You just did it again after I asked you about it. Template:TonyAward LightingDesign 1970–1975 should not be identical to 4 other templates. Please stop making duplicate templates and please clean up the mess you are making all over WP.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:31, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To combined the templates into one. I don't understand having multiple templates of the same subject. SibTower1987 (talk) 03:36, 20 March 2018 (UTC)SibTower1987SibTower1987 (talk) 03:36, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have messed up the templates quite a bit. There should not be multiple identical templates for all the subjects that you edit. @Woodensuperman and Frietjes: were gradually correctly merging things. You should talk to them and work with them on the proper procedures. In the mean time please stop creating more and more of a mess. All the templates that you have edited in the last week seem to be messed up. If templates have the same content, they should be merged.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:47, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would kindly request that you stop editing any of these templates. You'd made another mess of templates a few weeks ago that I had to go and undo. --wooden superman 09:18, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I won't be doing it anymore. SibTower1987 (talk) 22:56, 21 March 2018 (UTC)SibTower1987SibTower1987 (talk) 22:56, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SibTower1987, could you please explain why you feel that it is helpful to make templates like {{Grammy Award for Best Spoken Word Album 1960s}}, {{Grammy Award for Best Spoken Word Album 1970s}}, {{Grammy Award for Best Spoken Word Album 1980s}}, {{Grammy Award for Best Spoken Word Album 1990s}}, {{Grammy Award for Best Spoken Word Album 2000s}}, and {{Grammy Award for Best Spoken Word Album 2010s}} all be identical and redundant?-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:22, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know they were all the same; I'm sorry and I won't be doing it again. SibTower1987 (talk) 22:56, 21 March 2018 (UTC)SibTower1987SibTower1987 (talk) 22:56, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits have made different templates identical and redundant. What are you going to do to solve this problem?--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 11:23, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SibTower1987 can you comment on who you expect to clean up all the templates that you have messed up.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:13, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Editors; Even if I reversed everything, the editors would came back and change it. SibTower1987 (talk) 19:52, 24 March 2018 (UTC)SibTower1987SibTower1987 (talk) 19:52, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It does not make sense that you think people would insist that multiple redundant templates abound. Have you ever seen anyone create multiple redundant templates anywhere else on Wikipedia? A half decent edit summary should keep people from trying to restore multiple redundant templates.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 01:44, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template removals

Hi, Can you explain why you're removing the ScreenActorsGuildAward CastMotionPicture 2011–2020 template from tons of articles?. –Davey2010^Talk 02:14, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Because the Editors changed the ScreenActorsGuildAward CastMotionPicture 2011–2020, the template now only shows the film winners, not the cast. It doesn't make sense to have that template on a page that doesn't have them listed on it. SibTower1987 (talk) 02:35, 23 April 2018 (UTC)SibTower1987SibTower1987 (talk) 02:35, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ah sorry I thought the BLP names were in that template, Okie dokie no worries, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 02:41, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please....

...stop removing navbox shells from film articles, and restore the ones you removed. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:30, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I won't do that anymore. SibTower1987 (talk) 05:02, 29 May 2018 (UTC)SibTower1987SibTower1987 (talk) 05:02, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You need to stop removing nav boxes from articles. From the above, it appears you have a substantial history of poor editing choices in this area. You also need to learn to use edit summaries. Could you explain why you are removing the Grammy Award templates to musicians’ articles? Jusdafax (talk) 04:52, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I'm removing the Grammy Award templates from some pages, because some of the names don't appear in the templates anymore when the templates were merged. SibTower1987 (talk) 05:02, 29 May 2018 (UTC)SibTower1987SibTower1987 (talk) 05:02, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

From reading above entries, it appears you were the one doing the merging, which messed them up. I’m asking you to stop editing templates entirely. And you have also been asked to use edit summaries, but refuse to do so. Why? Jusdafax (talk) 05:12, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you didn't see from the dates, I stopped merging templates months ago (after another editor told me to); The edits I make are minor edits and when I make larger edits, I do use the edit summaries. SibTower1987 (talk) 05:22, 29 May 2018 (UTC)SibTower1987SibTower1987 (talk) 05:22, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Removing a nav box is not a minor edit. Please read WP:MINOR and understand it. Given your history, you should stay away from this type of mass editing. Since you are fairly new, I’m assuming good faith. But you should also read and understand WP:CIR regarding the competence required of editors. If you think you need help, ask. When in doubt, use edit summaries. It appears you have made some big mistakes. Learn from them. Stop any further template editing, is my strong request. Find something else to do on Wikipedia. Best wishes. Jusdafax (talk) 05:35, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template removals (Again)

What is this about ? Nobody's name is in the template, those are film titles, please explain all these removals. - FlightTime (open channel) 15:49, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Editors removed the actors names from the template and only shows the film titles. It doesn't make sense to have the template on the actors page where their names is no longer listed. SibTower1987 (talk) 15:56, 20 September 2018 (UTC)SibTower1987SibTower1987 (talk) 15:56, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aren't the actors still connected to those movies ? - FlightTime (open channel) 15:57, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The actors name do not have to be listed to use the template, as long as the actors are somehow notable connected to the films listed. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:03, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't make sense, because when you look at the template (sometimes) you don't know what movie the actor(s) appears in and some actor(s) appears in different movies. SibTower1987 (talk) 16:14, 20 September 2018 (UTC)SibTower1987SibTower1987 (talk) 16:14, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, then maybe you should seek consensus for all this. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:16, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Editors has done this to other templates only listing the movie (Screen Actors Guild Award for Outstanding Performance by a Cast in a Motion Picture and Satellite Award for Best Cast – Motion Picture). Also I saw on some of the actors pages that the template was already removed. When the next cast winners are announced, they're going to list the film and only put the template on the film page (not on any of the actors pages). SibTower1987 (talk) 16:28, 20 September 2018 (UTC)SibTower1987SibTower1987 (talk) 16:28, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, SibTower1987. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Beetlejuice (musical), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthony King (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to 78th Academy Awards does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Peaceray (talk) 04:36, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saturday Night Live (season 29), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jeff Richards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:32, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Crown (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Edwards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:06, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Golden Raspberry Award Templates

Hello, I've noticed that you have added a lot of templates to articles that are about the Golden Raspberry Awards. I don't know much about them, but in looking at Wikipedia:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers/Consensus summaries it was decided ten years ago to never include them on actor/actress articles. Did this get discussed with the Actors and Filmmakers WikiProject? Thanks! Jip Orlando (talk) 19:01, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know that! - I've always wonder why there were no templates for the actors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SibTower1987 (talk • contribs) 19:14, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response and reverting. This can be a politically-charged manner. Note that Donald Rumsfeld got a Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actor in 2004- I could see this as contentious. I think that the template for Worst Director is okay- but the other Golden Raspberry awards may not be appropriate, and not just limited to Worst Original Song, or whatever. I'm sorry you did a lot of work on this, but I don't want your good-faith work to cause many unhappy editors to come by demanding explanations. Thanks for your response! Jip Orlando (talk) 19:24, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'm removing the templates from the actors and actresses pages. If the editors want to remove the templates as a whole, it's in their hands. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SibTower1987 (talk • contribs) 19:32, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted five of those navboxes under CSD #4, recreation of a page that was previously deleted via an XFD. The remaining navboxes were not part of the original deletion discussion, so I've left them alone. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:21, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actor

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Template:Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actor has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2009_November_8#Template:Golden_Raspberry_Award_for_Worst_Actress. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:17, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Jim Nabors. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead, as someone could see your edit before you revert it. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 02:59, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Peaceray: That wasn't a test, SubTower1987 created the navboxes but did not realize they had already been deleted via TfD and removed the navboxes from the pages that they added them to. See #Golden_Raspberry_Award_Templates. Eagles 24/7 (C) 03:15, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Taylor Lautner, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 03:15, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Please stop marking all of your edits as minor. Please carefully read WP:MINOR for information about what is a minor edit and how not to mark edits as minor. Inappropriately marking edits as minor is deceptive and disrespectful to other editors. If you continue doing so after being asked to stop, it is considered disruptive editing. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 03:28, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Thank you for your contributions to Template:Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Screen Combo, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember that Wikipedia is a widely used reference tool, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the sandbox instead. The comment about Lindsay Lohan was inappropiate. Sundayclose (talk) 02:22, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't making jokes about her. That's how the Golden Raspberry Awards wrote it! Go to the pages of 28th Golden Raspberry Awards and Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Screen Combo to see that's the way they written it. You have to take it up with them. 02:35, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

That doesn't mean you have to put the joke into the Wikipedia article. You don't see that in other award templates where the website for the award makes a joke. Just don't restore it and there's no problem. Sundayclose (talk) 02:40, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The only thing in the template about Lindsay Lohan is her name and the name of the movie that she "won" for. 02:52, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Please take a few seconds to look at this version of the template that you wrote. The name of the film is not "as the yang to her own yin". Now just leave it out and move on and we're fine. I'm not going to continue arguing. Sundayclose (talk) 02:57, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to continue arguing either, but I didn't create that joke. When I created the template, I just copied what was on the page. I've should've taken it out before and after I posted it. I'm sorry, that was my mistake! 03:05, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

No problem. Thanks for getting my point. Sundayclose (talk) 03:06, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Artios Awards - Wrong Source

It looks like you're adding sources with the incorrect URLs for these. Please make sure the article you cite actually mentions the win or nomination. Otherwise, they're all going to get reverted if you cite the wrong source that doesn't support your edit. Starforce¹³ 20:22, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Artios Awards and the Casting Society of America are one in the same. The Artios Awards doesn't have their own page and on some pages, when you click on the Artios Awards it reverts to the Casting Society of America page. 20:26, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Here are the correct sources: Winners, nominees. (The article you're linking to is for movie nominees.) I've fixed some of them for you but the rest still need fixing before someone reverts them. Starforce¹³ 20:41, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Last Picture Show, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ben Johnson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Hello, I'm Hell in a Bucket. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Toy Story 4, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 20:29, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I got the news from the 40th Golden Raspberry Awards page and they also put the winners up on their YouTube page. 20:33, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

That's great but source it!Hell in a Bucket (talk) 20:45, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The source is the same page link as before (Razz Newz). 21:06, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Personally, I think it should be sourced seperately...BUT if it's sourced it is sourced. My apologies. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 21:09, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I don't put up anything without sourcing it first. I didn't know they announced the winners until I saw it listed in bold on the page and then I clicked the link to their YouTube page and watch them announcing the winners. 21:21, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

You did recently edit The Caine Mutiny without providing sources. Also, you appear to be signing posts without including your name. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 20:19, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to The Caine Mutiny (film) have been removed because you cited the information you added to IMDb. As discussed at WP:RS/IMDb, IMDb is considered a questionable source, and generally should not be used as a sole reference. You are welcome to re-add the information using a different reliable source, or with an additional source confirming the information from IMDb. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 18:04, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Hello S. I've started this thread Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#Memory check about the awards that you are adding to film articles. Please feel free to add any input that you have there. I would also suggest that you not add anymore awards until things get clarified. Also be aware that you are not sourcing these awards and that can be seen as WP:DISRUPTIVE editing. Thanks for your time. MarnetteD|Talk 05:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stub templates

I've noticed a lot of edits from you today which consisted solely of moving the stub template, in an article that already had one, from after the category declarations to a new spot before the category declarations. Please note that per WP:TAGSTUB, this is incorrect — the stub notice goes after the categories, not before them. Bearcat (talk) 18:40, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know that. I won't do that again. Thank you for that information.18:47, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

cat-sorting via pipe

Hi, I just wanted to let you know why I reverted your edit here. The wikitext [[Category:George Martin| ]] causes the article in which it is placed to be sorted as a null value in the applicable category; in this case, that means in Category:George Martin it will be placed at the very top on the category page, which is what we want when the article is the main article that corresponds to the category, as here.

When changed to [[Category:George Martin]], without the pipe, it will be listed under its ordinary sorting. That would be under "G" (for "George Martin"), except where there is a template like the {{DEFAULTSORT:Martin, George}} as here, which will have it sorted under "M" (for "Martin. George").

But we don't want either of those; it makes the main article get lost in the list. Using the piped-null trick (sometime a asterisk is used instead), it goes to the very top. TJRC (talk) 21:15, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I must of did it by accident. I wasn't aware of it. Sorry. 21:20, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dallas–Fort Worth Film Critics Association Award for Best Foreign Language Film moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dallas–Fort Worth Film Critics Association Award for Best Foreign Language Film, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. noq (talk) 22:20, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Film critic association awards navigational boxes

Hi, could you please temporarily refrain from creating anymore navigational boxes for various film critic association awards and categories? The number of them being created an added to already bloated navboxes in articles is getting out of hand, and I would like to achieve some consensus on their use first. I'm talking about all the ones you've created recently in these categories. You've added six of these to Won't You Be My Neighbor alone and a whopping 15 to Cate Blanchett. Thanks. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 19:15, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to the awards list to Better Call Saul

Hey, I noticed your edits to the awards list to Better Call Saul. First of all, thank you for adding to the list, and for your contributions to the article, but I just wanted to bring some stuff up. When citing sources, don't use the "|last=" and "|first=" parameters when listing two names (example). You can simply list the names separately with "|first1=", "|first2=", "|last1=", and "|last2=". Additionally, please try to update the infobox of the article when you add more nominations (I did it for you). Lastly, try to be consistent with the rest of the article. Some use "|last=" and "|first=" parameters when citing sources, but that specific awards list uses "|author", so please try to be consistent by also using it. Anyway, thank you for the edits, just wanted to bring those things up. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 19:10, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Grammy Award for Best Female Pop Vocal Performance

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:Grammy Award for Best Female Pop Vocal Performance requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 July 13#Non-major Grammy Awards. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 00:00, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Grammy Award for Best Traditional Pop Vocal Album

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:Grammy Award for Best Traditional Pop Vocal Album requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 July 13#Non-major Grammy Awards. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 00:01, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Grammy Award for Best Music Video

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:Grammy Award for Best Music Video requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 July 13#Non-major Grammy Awards. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 07:46, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Ricky Martin invitation

Hello!
I noticed you've made edits to Ricky Martin articles. I thought you may be interested in joining
Wikipedia:WikiProject Ricky Martin

We are a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Ricky Martin and his discography. If you would be interested in joining feel free to visit the Participants Page!
Thank You.

آرمین هویدایی (talk) 19:23, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Rudin

Your undoing of my revisions were unwarranted and allegations of vandalism were offensive and not in keeping with the principles of good faith. You are clearly connected to the entertainment industry based on your history of edits and not able to be objective. My additions were all supported by citations and reliable sources. Do not do this again. EdifyingEditor (talk) 15:32, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I'm not part of the entertainment industry, I enjoy what's in the entertainment industry. Second I didn't vandalize Scott Rudin's page! I didn't add or delete words, or change a single sentence or change any facts on that page. 16:45, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Small comment

See WP:CURLY before adding more references and update the awards table when doing so. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 16:58, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Specifically MOS:OVERLINK as it seemingly applies to the navigation templates you are creating as well. Magitroopa (talk) 07:55, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Same as above. Please stop overlinking. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 08:05, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dallas–Fort Worth Film Critics Association Award for Best Foreign Language Film

Hello, SibTower1987. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dallas–Fort Worth Film Critics Association Award for Best Foreign Language Film, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:02, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Viva Zapata!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Golden Globe Award for Best Supporting Actress.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Writing for a Variety Special

Template:Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Writing for a Variety Special has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 18:16, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited City Slickers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daniel Stern.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:EmmyAward Limited or Anthology Series

Template:EmmyAward Limited or Anthology Series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 15:24, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of awards and nominations received by James Bond films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Harrison.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pinocchio (1940 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page D23.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Bobbie Gentry, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Toasy Cake Fan 100 (talk) 23:52, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The reason why I removed the template from Bobbie Gentry, because there's only one award template listed. There probably were more templates listed before, but over time the templates were changed and were deleted from her page over time. Under the list of her awards only shows one template, giving it the false impression that there were more listed and that's why I deleted. Next time I'll give a reason. SibTower1987 (talk) 00:59, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 7

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

George Carlin's American Dream

added a link pointing to Variety

The Tinder Swindler

added a link pointing to Variety

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accolades won sourcing

Hey, thanks for updating the status of awards but if changing something from pending to won then needs a new reference as not covered by the old reference, e.g. [1]. Thanks, Indagate (talk) 07:27, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @SibTower1987:, please see this again as you did same in this edit today [2], the old reference does not support the statement the show won the award, just that it was nominated, so need a new reference to verify it won. Thanks, Indagate (talk) 09:12, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @SibTower1987:, same issue again today [3],[4],[5],[6], old reference does not support new statement of won so you are adding unsourced information, please stop and provide a new reference. Indagate (talk) 07:18, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited And the Band Played On (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mubi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Awards were added to Dianne Warren from before she was born

[7] seems to now have a section Academy Honorary Award that seems to have nothing to do with Dianne Warren. Many of the dates are from before she was born. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.172.52.184 (talk) 18:58, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

BAFTA: Music

Hello. Are this and this the same thing? KWiki (talk) 14:32, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, both templates are the same, but the Template:BAFTA Award for Best Original Music is the current name that they use for the award. SibTower1987 (talk) 17:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AARP award nav boxes

Hi. Did you get consensus for such mass additions of templates like this here? It seems WP:INDISCRIMINATE to post this AARP award nav box on every film and actor page that won it. Why just this award? Mike Allen 15:11, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The AARP Movies for Grownups Awards are over 20 years old. They also play a part in award season. Given that the award has it's own template, why it's awards doesn't. I feel this award should have it's own templates for each category. SibTower1987 (talk) 18:12, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to bring this up on the Wikiproject Film talk page since its being added to a lot of articles. Mike Allen 18:22, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 05:20, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to remember to do that. SibTower1987 (talk) 05:24, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 06:48, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - i removed some edits you made to Dakota Johnson because they removed an award templates! The other edits looked okay, but you didn't cite a reason for the removal in the edit summary so I couldn't tell if it was vandalism or not. I erred on the side of caution! If you edit in the future, try not to delete something without leaving an explanation! SpookyTwenty (talk) 19:20, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SpookyTwenty Not excusing the lack of explanation, but the removed navbox fails WP:BIDIRECTIONAL. Thanks, Indagate (talk) 19:26, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Indagate :D SpookyTwenty (talk) 19:55, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of awards and nominations received by Saturday Night Live, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. hardly any sources for that article but that's no reason to not add a source when you add content Indagate (talk) 18:26, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Hello SibTower1987!

The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:DramaDesk WigHairDesign

Template:DramaDesk WigHairDesign has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 10:40, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:DramaDesk MusicalFeaturedPerformance

Template:DramaDesk MusicalFeaturedPerformance has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 10:42, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:DramaDesk SoundDesign

Template:DramaDesk SoundDesign has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 10:44, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:DramaDesk SoundDesignPlay

Template:DramaDesk SoundDesignPlay has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 10:56, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:DramaDesk SoundDesignMusical

Template:DramaDesk SoundDesignMusical has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 10:57, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Drama Desk Award for Wig and Hair Design templates

A tag has been placed on Category:Drama Desk Award for Wig and Hair Design templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 12:17, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in David Miner (television producer). There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please stop removing one of the empty lines before stub templates (if there are two empty lines)! There should be "two blank lines between the first stub template and whatever precedes it" (see WP:STUBSPACING). Thanks! Felida⁹⁷ (talk) 10:44, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:EmmyAward GameShow

Template:EmmyAward GameShow has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 15:49, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]