User talk:Seasider53/Archive 3
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Seasider53. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 8 |
April 2021
Please don't change the format of dates, as you did to Nick Dasovic. As a general rule, if an article has evolved using predominantly one format, the dates should be left in the format they were originally written in, unless there are reasons for changing it based on strong national ties to the topic. Please also note that Wikipedia does not use ordinal suffixes (e.g., st, nd, th), articles, or leading zeros on dates.
For more information about how dates should be written on Wikipedia, please see this page.
If you have any questions about this, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Enjoy your time on Wikipedia. MOS:DATETIES is clear that Canadian subjects can have either format, and the first one used should be retained. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:40, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Squares of Savannah, Georgia into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 20:04, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Copyright warning
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Moses Fowler House, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:
- Copying text from other sources
- Policy on copyright
- Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy
- Policy and guideline on non-free content
If you still have questions, there is the teahouse, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.
- Introduction
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:11, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Wikiproject tagging
Is there a reason you are marking articles as list class when infact they arent a list, but about a place/location. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 18:43, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Washington Square (Savannah) buildings indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 14:24, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Portland movies
Thanks for taking care of that. I think I added it 16 years ago from IMDB, and we no longer really consider that a quality source! Bkissin (talk)
Disambiguation link notification for May 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited EFL Golden Glove, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Maxwell.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Flight Deck Brewing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IPA.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Flight Deck Brewing for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flight Deck Brewing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
User:Namiba 14:41, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of 112–114 East Oglethorpe Avenue for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/112–114 East Oglethorpe Avenue until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Orphaned non-free image File:Flight Deck Brewing logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Flight Deck Brewing logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Category:1913 establishments in Nebraska Territory
Category:1913 establishments in Nebraska Territory seems to have been created in error. I have merged the member page into Category:1913 establishments in Nebraska and tagged it for deletion along with its parents. – Fayenatic London 14:36, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- Roger that. - Seasider53 (talk) 15:13, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Het Graudian
A tag has been placed on Het Graudian requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. signed, Rosguill talk 17:47, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Strichen
Hey - I saw that Strichen Town House article - very nice. It's got a few paragraphs in Walker and Woodworth - I was going to send you a copy, but you don't have email enabled. If you'd like to see it, send me a mail and I'll forward it. Cheers Girth Summit (blether) 19:02, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Girth Summit: email address added now; send away! Seasider53 (talk) 20:41, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Seasider53, hi - just checking you got my mail, the attachments were pretty big so I just wanted to make sure. Girth Summit (blether) 10:20, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Girth Summit: Yes indeed, thank you. Dormskirk did the bulk of the work on the article, by the way, but I'll add in what's missing from your source. Seasider53 (talk) 12:16, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Seasider53, so it was, I'd missed that. Well, good teamwork then! It's long enough for a DYK, if you can think of a good hook. By the way, I don't remember ever seeing your username at WP:The 10,000 Challenge - it would be great to see a few more Scottish flags there. Let me know if you ever want me to look up refs for any more buildings; I've got most of the 'Buildings of Scotland' series on the shelf. I've only ever come across one Cat A building that wasn't described in them (an old but obscure bridge near Dalbeattie), and most Cat B buildings are covered. Cheers Girth Summit (blether) 12:39, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Girth Summit, excellent - I'll have a peek at my articles that are stubs and see if you have info on them. I'll join the 10,000 Challenge momentarily too. Seasider53 (talk) 17:18, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Girth Summit:
- Whistlefield Inn, Argyll - mostly looking for more of a confirmation as to its period of construction. HES says "19th century or earlier," but one of the other references gives 1663.
- George Hotel, Dunoon - cat C listed.
- Whitehill Lodge, Peterhead, Aberdeenshire - mostly as a test to see if it's mentioned in your book(s).
- Bath House, Peterhead - cat B, dates to 1812.
- Hafton House, Argyll. Has a lot about its residents; not too much about the structure itself.
- Girth Summit:
- Girth Summit, excellent - I'll have a peek at my articles that are stubs and see if you have info on them. I'll join the 10,000 Challenge momentarily too. Seasider53 (talk) 17:18, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Seasider53, so it was, I'd missed that. Well, good teamwork then! It's long enough for a DYK, if you can think of a good hook. By the way, I don't remember ever seeing your username at WP:The 10,000 Challenge - it would be great to see a few more Scottish flags there. Let me know if you ever want me to look up refs for any more buildings; I've got most of the 'Buildings of Scotland' series on the shelf. I've only ever come across one Cat A building that wasn't described in them (an old but obscure bridge near Dalbeattie), and most Cat B buildings are covered. Cheers Girth Summit (blether) 12:39, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Girth Summit: Yes indeed, thank you. Dormskirk did the bulk of the work on the article, by the way, but I'll add in what's missing from your source. Seasider53 (talk) 12:16, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Seasider53, hi - just checking you got my mail, the attachments were pretty big so I just wanted to make sure. Girth Summit (blether) 10:20, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- There are a couple of others, but I'm resigned to them remaining stubs as just existing historic structures. Seasider53 (talk) 17:39, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Seasider53, hmm. I'm afraid my Argyll and Bute book has let me down - none of those buildings are mentioned. To be honest, Cat C is pushing it - almost all Cat A buildings are covered in some depth, and most Cat B get at least a few lines, but Cat C is very hit and miss. A bit more luck with Peterhead, both of those buildings are mentioned, but not a huge amount of detail. Check your email. Girth Summit (blether) 08:34, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- There are a couple of others, but I'm resigned to them remaining stubs as just existing historic structures. Seasider53 (talk) 17:39, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
The article Jorg Neumann has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
GNG fail
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --- Possibly ☎ 03:44, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Jorg Neumann for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jorg Neumann until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
--- Possibly ☎ 14:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
- Hello. I also restored the old prod tag that you removed from the talk page. It's normal to leave these as a record; someone might come along and want to prod it again, which is only allowed once. Finally, it's hard to read some of your edits as you leave edit summaries so infrequently. --- Possibly ☎ 14:05, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Bandwagon Musical Supplies for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bandwagon Musical Supplies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Onel5969 TT me 13:22, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Bandwagon Musical Supplies
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Bandwagon Musical Supplies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --- Possibly ☎ 17:24, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia
Hi Seasider53! Thank you for your edits to Herb House. It looks like you've copied or moved text from Pirates' House into that page, and while you are welcome to re-use the content, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. If you've copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thanks! DanCherek (talk) 12:25, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Lancaster City ZFC
Good morning. Many thanks for taking it join yourself to deciding to delete sections of the page I've been updating and editing for years, and then blocking any new edits. I sincerely hope that you know enough about the club to keep it updated yourself. Totally unnecessary. Kind regards DoctoJimmy (talk) 04:07, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
- Ah, now there’s a blast from the past! Seasider53 (talk) 04:23, 27 August 2021 (UTC)