User talk:ScribeYearling/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:ScribeYearling. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
SuggestBot
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:38, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Removed PROD
Why'd you remove the PROD at Bays, WV? RES2773 (talk) 02:57, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
- Because it's just too early to consider it PRODable, as it was made within a few minutes ago. Also, the writer is new, and I really don't want to drive them away. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 03:01, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
- I understand that. However this article doesn't appear to have anything to base upon. Not sure what the move is. RES2773 (talk) 03:05, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
- @Jjjjjjdddddd: Please re-read WP:PROD. Your opinion is out of step with policy. As a courtesy we try not to recommend deletion within hours of creation, but that's not an absolute rule. Chris Troutman (talk) 03:42, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
- And @RES2773: Both of you need to read WP:GEOLAND and brush up on your professionalism. Don't edit in areas you don't understand. Chris Troutman (talk) 03:45, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
- I wasn't talking strictly about policy, I just think we generally shouldn't prod articles within a few minutes of their creation, unless they are obviously bad-faith. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 03:48, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
- @Chris troutman: "Typically" does not always mean "definitely". There are some places that may just not be notable on the level to have a page. I doubt this article will reach a proper length without redundancies or orgininal research. But if there are more good sources out there, then I will let it be. RES2773 (talk) 13:34, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
- I'm just saying, we shouldn't jump on a page when it's just been written, unless it's obviously trash. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 21:03, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
- @Chris troutman: "Typically" does not always mean "definitely". There are some places that may just not be notable on the level to have a page. I doubt this article will reach a proper length without redundancies or orgininal research. But if there are more good sources out there, then I will let it be. RES2773 (talk) 13:34, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
- I understand that. However this article doesn't appear to have anything to base upon. Not sure what the move is. RES2773 (talk) 03:05, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
@Chris troutman and RES2773: one of the very reasons (brought up in a discussion in 2010) why it can be beneficial to PROD an article very quickly, is because chances are the probable drive-by creator is still online. Unlike CSD which uses canned rationales, a PROD if worded reasonably, does not necessarily bite the new user. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:15, 2 July 2017 (UTC),
Okay everyone, I would like to apologize. I started something that really didn't need to happen, and have dragged people into this that weren't even involved in the first place. So, sorry everybody. I think I'll leave this be now. Thanks. RES2773 (talk) 00:36, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
- It's alright, I can see why you would have prodded it, based on the looks of it. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 01:02, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Test
A tag has been placed on Draft:Test requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
This Draft is an exact copy-paste of Draft:Draft
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 07:08, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
will move to draftspace
Hi, why are you removing speedy deletion templates from articles and moving them to draftspace? Surely this defeats the whole point of the CSD's existence. Furthermore, Shelby Riffle does seem to me to be basically just nonsense. And even if it is reasonable to move to draftspace, I think this should be done before removing the speedy deletion template. — Smjg (talk) 09:02, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Smjg:Wait, which articles? I know I have been doing that lately, but I'm not sure exactly which articles you are talking about. Also, I agree Shelby Riffle looks like nonsense, but I want to give them a chance. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 09:05, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
- I was referring to the two on which you used that edit summary - Mario Nesich was the other one. We have a protocol for giving people a chance - the 10–15-minute courtesy window. Though I agree, it's poorly documented. Once that window has passed, pages meeting the CSD are fair game to being tagged as such. If we moved all such pages to the draft namespace instead, what would be the point of the CSDs existing? — Smjg (talk) 12:25, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
- I thought it was longer than that. Also, I don't want to be too WP:BITEy by immediately deleting pages, especially if they may have merit as en encyclopedic page. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 19:39, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
SuggestBot
Reverting
- You are new, so I will not get upset about your reverting. Did I revert your edit?? NO. I just removed it in editing. Reversions are for VANDALS. P.S. Time and date does not belong in that spot. Happy editing! Pocketthis (talk) 20:38, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- Did I revert that? Also, I should clarify from where I got the information. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 00:13, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
SuggestBot
Your draft article, Draft:Online Film and Television Association
Hello, Jjjjjjdddddd. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Online Film and Television Association".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 16:59, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:39, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:Jjjjjjdddddd/.io game
User:Jjjjjjdddddd/.io game, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jjjjjjdddddd/.io game and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Jjjjjjdddddd/.io game during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 23:53, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: 9 + 10 = 21 (October 29)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:9 + 10 = 21 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! Jjjjjjdddddd,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – Joe (talk) 08:37, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
|
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Lance Bulen: bands, Baton Rouge , Puzzle Gut and Kingbaby . In the 90's he recorded 3 full length albums; two with Baton Rouge on Atlantic and East West Records which broke Billboards top 200 and the 3rd with his band Puzzle Gut on Interscope Records.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Lance Bulen: bands, Baton Rouge , Puzzle Gut and Kingbaby . In the 90's he recorded 3 full length albums; two with Baton Rouge on Atlantic and East West Records which broke Billboards top 200 and the 3rd with his band Puzzle Gut on Interscope Records., requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- The page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. (See section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:47, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
- It should be noted that I, yesterday, nominated this page for deletion, to anyone reading this talk page. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 01:49, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Ocarina of Time TIME Piece
Hi. I requested an article be userfied after I pointed out that the content in it was not featured in the topic page. This content was from TIME Magazine's site, but is locked by membership and now not available to read. Could you restore it long enough to save it to a pastebin or somewhere else public while I merge the usable content? Some content was referred to in a follow-up Time interview with Shigeru Miyamoto. Ally2good (talk) 17:11, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Ally2good, sorry for the late reply. I don't really understand what you're asking. If you're asking me to restore a deleted page, I cannot do that, however an administrator can. Otherwise, could you clarify what you mean? Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 01:47, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
&action=delete
URL for this page is https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jjjjjjdddddd&action=delete in case you're curious. Feel free to click; it won't let you do anything.
You're quite welcome! Since I have abilities most people don't, I suppose I should answer questions readily, with lots of details if requested. Nyttend (talk) 03:21, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
PS, see File:Deleting jjjjjjdddddd.png and File:Deleting jjjjjjdddddd with dropdown.png; these are with the Monobook skin. Aside from the sidebar, the only thing missing from both screens is the very bottom; below the "Delete page" button is a level two header ==Deletion log== and then the log itself; since this page has never been deleted, this section says "No matching items in log." Nyttend (talk) 03:29, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Interesting, thanks! Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 05:36, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 November 2017
- News and notes: Cons, cons, cons
- Arbitration report: Administrator desysoped; How to deal with crosswiki issues; Mister Wiki case likely
- Technology report: Searching and surveying
- Interview: A featured article centurion
- WikiProject report: Recommendations for WikiProjects
- In the media: Open knowledge platform as a media institution
- Traffic report: Strange and inappropriate
- Featured content: We will remember them
- Recent research: Who wrote this? New dataset on the provenance of Wikipedia text
New Page Reviewing
 |
| Hello, Jjjjjjdddddd.
I've seen you editing recently and you seem knowledgeable about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. |
I notice that you have the "administrator someday" userbox. Reviewing new pages is one of the best ways to develop experience needed to successfully wield the mop. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 10:27, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Jjjjjjdddddd. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ANI Experiences survey
The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.
The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:
If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.
Please be aware this survey will close Friday, Dec. 8 at 23:00 UTC.
Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 December 2017
- Special report: Women in Red World Contest wrap-up
- Featured content: Featured content to finish 2017
- In the media: Stolen seagulls, public domain primates and more
- Arbitration report: Last case of 2017: Mister Wiki editors
- Gallery: Wiki loving
- Recent research: French medical articles have "high rate of veracity"
- Technology report: Your wish lists and more Wikimedia tech
- Traffic report: Notable heroes and bad guys
Please join us for our Cascadia Wikimedians annual meeting, Saturday, December 23, 1 PM
|
If you are in the Seattle area, please join us for our Cascadia Wikimedians annual meeting, Saturday, December 23, 1 PM. If you cannot attend in person, you may join us virtually from your PC, Mac, Linux, iOS, or Android at this link: https://zoom.us/j/2207426850. The address of the physical meeting is: Capitol Hill Meeting Room at Capitol Hill Library (425 Harvard Ave. E., Seattle, WA 98102) 47°37′23″N 122°19′20″W / 47.622928°N 122.322312°W
The event page is here. You do not have to be a member to attend, but only members can vote in board elections. New members may join in person by completing the membership registration form onsite or (to be posted) online and paying $5 for a calendar year / $0.50 per month for the remainder of a year. Current members may renew for 2018 at the meeting as well. Cascadia Wikimedians User Group is a recognized 501c3 non-profit organization in the US. EIN # 47-3513818 Our mail address is Cascadia Wikimedians User Group, 520 Kirkland Way, PO Box 2305, Kirkland, WA 98083. |
NPP Flowchart
I used draw.io for the NPP flowchart. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 03:22, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
- Hey, thanks, and Merry Christmas! Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 03:23, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 January 2018
- News and notes: Communication is key
- In the media: The Paris Review, British Crown and British Media
- Featured content: History, gaming and multifarious topics
- Interview: Interview with Ser Amantio di Nicolao, the top contributor to English Wikipedia by edit count
- Technology report: Dedicated Wikidata database servers
- Arbitration report: Mister Wiki is first arbitration committee decision of 2018
- Traffic report: The best and worst of 2017
New rights!
Hello Jjjjjjdddddd. Your account has been granted the "rollbacker" and "pending changes reviewer" user rights. These user rights allow you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes and quickly revert the edits of other users.
- Please keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin).
- The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection enabled is located at Special:StablePages. You may find the following pages useful to review:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing.
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes.
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of reviewer or rollback. If you no longer want either of these user rights, contact me and I'll remove it, alternatively you can leave a request on the administrators' noticeboard. Happy editing! — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 17:36, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
.codes (disambiguation)
Thank you for your critique of the .codes (Disambiguation) article. Opinions are highly, highly valued @Wikipedia. Habatchii (talk) 18:03, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- Sure, no problem! Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 02:51, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Need help with article against vandalism
Can you or an administrator please please check if this article needs page protection from edit warring and vandalism? I’m not sure what 120.28.150.50 is up to but the user has been editing nonsense into the article. Either user is practicing or intentionally entering gibberish but it’s destroying the article. Thank you for your help.Pipamidalton (talk) 20:25, 31 January 2018 (UTC) Pipamidalton (talk) 20:25, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Sure, I'll help you. Which article? Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 06:34, 2 February 2018 (UTC)- Ok, I know what article you're talking about, but our vandal seems to have stopped it. Still, I'll watch the page, and our anti-vandal bots should get the worst of it. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 06:40, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 5 February 2018
- Featured content: Wars, sieges, disasters and everything black possible
- Traffic report: TV, death, sports, and doodles
- Special report: Cochrane–Wikipedia Initiative
- Arbitration report: New cases requested for inter-editor hostility and other collaboration issues
- In the media: Solving crime; editing out violence allegations
- Humour: You really are in Wonderland
Your submission at Articles for creation: KSL Classifieds has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
jcc (tea and biscuits) 17:15, 8 February 2018 (UTC)The Signpost: 20 February 2018
- News and notes: The future is Swedish with a lack of administrators
- Recent research: Politically diverse editors write better articles; Reddit and Stack Overflow benefit from Wikipedia but don't give back
- Arbitration report: Arbitration committee prepares to examine two new cases
- Traffic report: Addicted to sports and pain
- Featured content: Entertainment, sports and history
- Technology report: Paragraph-based edit conflict screen; broken thanks
Would you please discuss this? This is not a serious attempt at a draft article. The IP is blocked for creating dozens of garbage articles like this one. Did you even read it? I fail to see how you can possibly think that an article that claims something takes place (or will take place) "Since Date August 15, 2045 and July 20, 2108" is not either test or a hoax. It seems a waste of time for you to force this to go to AFD, but I will certainly take it there if you insist. Maybe you can provide your arguments for keeping it. Meters (talk) 03:35, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
- It seems to me that the IP was just trying to create articles about years, and we were too hasty to block. It would be better to explain to the IP why the articles are unsuitable for the encyclopedia. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 03:41, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
- As I said on the draft's talk page. You cannot see the content of the 36 deleted drafts, so you do not know why they were deleted. Most of them were deleted as hoaxes, because they clearly were hoaxes. Claiming that an odd-numbered year is a leap year, or claiming that someone accomplished something 2000 or 3000 years from now, for example,. If you think user:Maile66 (the admin who deleted many of the drafts and blocked the IP.) was wrong feel then take it up with the admin. Meters (talk) 03:53, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
- Right, I can't vouch for claims that "someone accomplished something 2000 or 3000 years from now", but I think the odd-numbered leap years are more ignorance than anything. Regardless, I think this IP will listen to reason. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 03:56, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
- This is a waste of time. You don't know what was in the drafts. so you don't know what you are talking about. The IP was blocked under WP:NOTHERE for creating hoax drafts. I'm done wasting time. Don't remove the current speedy on this draft unless you take it to AFD.. Meters (talk) 04:03, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
- Right, I can't vouch for claims that "someone accomplished something 2000 or 3000 years from now", but I think the odd-numbered leap years are more ignorance than anything. Regardless, I think this IP will listen to reason. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 03:56, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
- As I said on the draft's talk page. You cannot see the content of the 36 deleted drafts, so you do not know why they were deleted. Most of them were deleted as hoaxes, because they clearly were hoaxes. Claiming that an odd-numbered year is a leap year, or claiming that someone accomplished something 2000 or 3000 years from now, for example,. If you think user:Maile66 (the admin who deleted many of the drafts and blocked the IP.) was wrong feel then take it up with the admin. Meters (talk) 03:53, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Your recently approved pending changes to Aditi Rao Hydari
I noticed that you accepted two pending changes to the Aditi Rao Hydari article that added in the subject's year of birth, which is disputed because multiple sources claim different years of birth, and there doesn't seem to be a reliable source that could establish the real year of birth. This has been discussed on the talk page of the article and it was decided to keep the year out until a reliable source that can confirm it emerges.
Please be careful when reviewing pending changes, especially to WP:BLPs like this one. There's already enough false/unconfirmed information floating around the internet, we don't need anymore of that on Wikipedia :) Smtchahal (talk) 06:14, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
- What, really? Sorry, I thought year of birth was a pretty uncontroversial addition, but I didn't know it was disputed. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 06:30, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Stockhausen
Thanks a million for accepting my AfC sub. Mind uploading the DVD cover (here)? Thanks.--79.181.45.241 (talk) 21:57, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
:format(jpeg):mode_rgb():quality(90)/discogs-images/R-3683770-1514488502-7418.jpeg.jpg){kind=link}
- Yes, no problem! This is actually my first day doing AFC. And I'll upload the picture, no problem. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 22:00, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
- Great! Please inform me when you do.--79.181.45.241 (talk) 22:06, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
- It's uploaded at File:Helicopter String Quartet.jpg, but I've hit a problem, Wikipedia:File copyright tags. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 22:12, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for all you did. Did my best to deal with it so you might want to take a look over there.--79.181.45.241 (talk) 22:16, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
- Looks good, thanks! Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 22:26, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
- You are more than welcome.--79.181.45.241 (talk) 22:28, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
- Looks good, thanks! Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 22:26, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for all you did. Did my best to deal with it so you might want to take a look over there.--79.181.45.241 (talk) 22:16, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
- It's uploaded at File:Helicopter String Quartet.jpg, but I've hit a problem, Wikipedia:File copyright tags. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 22:12, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
- Great! Please inform me when you do.--79.181.45.241 (talk) 22:06, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Brenda Sell has been accepted
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Legacypac (talk) 00:47, 15 March 2018 (UTC)Bear with Me
The pagespace has been unlocked regarding the draft you've been reviewing. Check User:Czar talkpage. Regards,Kiksam (talk) 22:43, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
I'd like to add that you marked it for review on the 12th, and never followed up. Usually, reviews should take less than 12 hours. I'll do this review for you, but please remember to remove the under review tag if you've abandoned it. Thanks, Vermont | reply here 12:56, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
- Just noticed it was salted. I'll take care of it. Vermont | reply here 12:58, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Traffic Jam
When you're already late ... HTG Happy Thanksgiving (talk) 07:03, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Proposed merge
You proposed that Draft:Meeee be merged into E-commerce, but you did not start a discussion for the merge. Just what portion of that rather sketchy and pointless draft would you propose merging to the E-commerce article that could possibly improve it? WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:51, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Well, there isn't any good content there, but if I say I merged it, I can have a stronger case for deleting the old title. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 21:43, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
- The old title is an unsubmitted and likely abandoned draft. It will die on the vine and be deleted eventually anyway. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:01, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
- PS: Please {{ping}} me on any further replies as I don't watch every talk page that I've interacted with. Thanks! WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:03, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
- @WikiDan61: Yes, it may be deletable as-is or G13ed, fair enough point. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 01:04, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
Thank you for your kind words! Have a wonderful day!
— Javert2113 (talk) 04:35, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018
- News and notes: Wiki Conference roundup and new appointments.
- Arbitration report: Ironing out issues in infoboxes; not sure yet about New Jersey; and an administrator who probably wasn't uncivil to a sockpuppet.
- Traffic report: Real sports, real women and an imaginary country: what's on top for Wikipedia readers
- Featured content: Animals, Ships, and Songs
- Technology report: Timeless skin review by Force Radical.
- Special report: ACTRIAL wrap-up.
- Humour: WikiWorld Reruns
AfC notification: Draft:Brendanz Dystopia has a new comment
- I dislike twinkle for sending you this. Anyway, you might want to look at this draft. Legacypac (talk) 06:01, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Brendanz Dystopia
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Brendanz Dystopia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:13, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
- Jjjjjd, how do you come to be the author of this page? No sources, it looks to me to be nothing but a descriptive promotion of a YouTube channel? —SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:15, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
I looked into this. He took one sentence something like "more info coming soon" he found in mainspace and created a Draft for the title. Later another account dumped all the junk on top. It went G13 on my tag so when restored it popped on my watch list. I noticed Twinkle notifying jd so I looked at why. Legacypac (talk) 11:22, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
- OK thanks. It’s good to check out unexpected notifications, in case something is broken. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:34, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
- What happened? I leave for one day... Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 01:17, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
| This is an archive of past discussions about User:ScribeYearling. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |