User talk:Sander.v.Ginkel/Archive 5

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

→

Archive 10

Stub enthusiasm

Greetings! I noticed your progress in creating stub templates, and I see that you've figured out some of the pitfalls of the process thereof. You seem to have good intentions and I would encourage you to check in with the stub sorting project when convenient. There you'll find guidelines on how to format the parts of a stub template and what to do with categories, for example:

• Established abbreviations for countries, e.g. "UK" for the United Kingdom, "US" (not USA) for the United States.
• The practice known as "upmerging" and the reasons for it, usually because the criteria for a stub category is to have at least 60 articles that would fill the category
• How to add categories that exist, rather than leaving redlinked categories on a stub template.
  

These and other stub-related goodies are available at the link given above! Come by any time. Cheers, Her Pegship (talk) 22:20, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

@Pegship:, thank you for letting me know! For the next templates I will exclude the red links categories. I started creating over 2500 international weightlifters. So at the moment there are not yet that many in the created stub-templates as I just started, but many will follow! Thanks, Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 10:55, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

10,000 Challenge

Hi. If you could somehow flesh out as many of those footballer stubs as you can they can join the main list and be counted!♦ Dr. Blofeld 06:04, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

@Dr. Blofeld:, ah, great! However I created all the international Wales players. I found data of international weightlifters so started creating all of the about 2500 weightlifters at the past 20 World Championships. I will list the British and Irish people to the list! And let me know if you know a good list of British/Irish sportspeople :) Thanks for coming by, Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 10:51, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Only today and tomorrow left on Wikipedia:WikiProject England/The West Country Challenge. We need 42 articles to pass 500. If you feel like fleshing out a few articles/ref fixing/cleanup of some articles that would be very welcome!♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:31, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

@Dr. Blofeld: sorry, but I have to say I don't have time these days to create some of the West Country articles. Will pop-in next time again :). After a quick search I saw many British/Irish Women's football players missing. And also women's Basketball players to be created :). Will create them during a new challenge! Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 20:32, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scotland women's national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lee Alexander. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of List of weightlifters at the 2003 World Weightlifting Championships for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of weightlifters at the 2003 World Weightlifting Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of weightlifters at the 2003 World Weightlifting Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 19:25, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of List of weightlifters at the 2007 World Weightlifting Championships for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of weightlifters at the 2007 World Weightlifting Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of weightlifters at the 2007 World Weightlifting Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 19:27, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of List of weightlifters at the 1999 World Weightlifting Championships for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of weightlifters at the 1999 World Weightlifting Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of weightlifters at the 1999 World Weightlifting Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 19:27, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of List of weightlifters at the 2006 World Weightlifting Championships for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of weightlifters at the 2006 World Weightlifting Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of weightlifters at the 2006 World Weightlifting Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 19:27, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of List of weightlifters at the 1998 World Weightlifting Championships for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of weightlifters at the 1998 World Weightlifting Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of weightlifters at the 1998 World Weightlifting Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 19:28, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of List of weightlifters at the 2010 World Weightlifting Championships for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of weightlifters at the 2010 World Weightlifting Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of weightlifters at the 2010 World Weightlifting Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 19:28, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Francois Etoundi a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 00:27, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

@Dl2000:, Hi, sorry I already undid your reversion. As there were two articles about the same person I merged the two articles into one. As you will see it is not a copy paste as info fro the two pages are merged together. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 07:43, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

There was only one article on this person until you created an unnecessary copy of François Etoundi yesterday without explanation. Francois Etoundi had existed since 2014 and if necessary should have been moved to François Etoundi instead. However, there should be justification provided for changes in title, based on guidelines such as WP:NCP. Your actions did in fact constitute an improper copy-paste move for the reasons indicated above. Dl2000 (talk) 23:29, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

@Dl2000:, yes I see what you mean. So it should be reverted and a move be requested? Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 07:45, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Move request is in progress - this can be followed on Talk:Francois Etoundi and should soon be listed at WP:RM (requested moves noticeboard). Dl2000 (talk) 20:59, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

@Dl2000:, Yes I saw it on my watchlist. However, when you reverted everyting again, you forgot to change the whole article (because it was not a cut-and-paste move but a merge). So I added the info for the third time now. What a hassle! Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 21:10, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of weightlifters at the 2003 World Weightlifting Championships

added links pointing to Anthony Martin, Robert Murphy, Benjamin Turner, Vladimir Popov, Mehmet Yilmaz, Santiago Martinez, Peter May, Nelson Castro, Sergei Zhukov, Alexei Petrov, Hakan Yilmaz, Zoltan Farkas, Ivan Hernandez, Mohamed Ibrahim, Andrey Makarov, Juan Carlos Reyes, Zhiyong Shi and Victor Castro

List of weightlifters at the 2007 World Weightlifting Championships

added links pointing to Ivan Efremov, Benjamin Turner, Vladimir Popov, Santiago Martinez, Zhen Li, Sergio Martinez, Tigran Martirosyan, William Ainslie, Vladimir Kuznetsov, Nelson Castro, Hakan Yilmaz, Artem Ivanov, Kevin Stuart, Peter Nagy, Mohamed Ibrahim and Zhiyong Shi

List of weightlifters at the 1999 World Weightlifting Championships

added links pointing to Vladimir Popov, Mehmet Yilmaz, Santiago Martinez, Ivan Ivanov, Zoltan Kovacs, Nelson Castro, James Power, Alexei Petrov, Thomas Gough, Adrian Popa, Zoltan Farkas, Ara Vardanyan, Andrey Makarov, David Guest and Zhiyong Shi

List of weightlifters at the 2006 World Weightlifting Championships

added links pointing to Anthony Martin, Vladimir Popov, Juan Jimenez, Santiago Martinez, Zhen Li, Sergio Martinez, Tigran Martirosyan, Vladimir Kuznetsov, Rodrigo Garcia, Kevin Stuart, Peter Nagy, Andriy Melnyk, Lian Yang and Zhiyong Shi

List of weightlifters at the 1998 World Weightlifting Championships

added links pointing to Vladimir Popov, Mehmet Yilmaz, Santiago Martinez, Ivan Ivanov, Peter May, Zoltan Kovacs, Adrian Popa, Zoltan Farkas, Ara Vardanyan and Sergei Syrtsov

List of weightlifters at the 2015 World Weightlifting Championships

added links pointing to Ivan Efremov, Tigran Martirosyan, Sarah Davies, Valentin Hristov, Peter Nagy, Kristina Larsen, Sukhen Dey, Hao Liu, Zhiyong Shi and Dmytro Chumak

List of weightlifters at the 2010 World Weightlifting Championships

added links pointing to Alexandr Ivanov, Carlos Hernandez, Ivan Efremov, Tigran Martirosyan, William Ainslie, Vladimir Kuznetsov, Artem Ivanov, Peter Nagy and Patrick Judge

List of weightlifters at the 2011 World Weightlifting Championships

added links pointing to Alexandr Ivanov, Carlos Hernandez, Ivan Efremov, Kirill Pavlov, Tigran Martirosyan, Vladimir Kuznetsov, Artem Ivanov, Valentin Hristov and Peter Nagy

List of weightlifters at the 2005 World Weightlifting Championships

added links pointing to Robert Murphy, Richard Patterson, Santiago Martinez, Zhen Li, Sergio Martinez, Tigran Martirosyan, Nelson Castro and Zhiyong Shi

List of weightlifters at the 2009 World Weightlifting Championships

added links pointing to Richard Patterson, Tigran Martirosyan, Johan Nystrom, Vladimir Kuznetsov, Artem Ivanov, Ivan Hernandez and Patrick Judge

List of weightlifters at the 2001 World Weightlifting Championships

added links pointing to Santiago Martinez, Peter May, Zoltan Kovacs, Lu Chen, Adrian Popa and Zoltan Farkas

List of weightlifters at the 2013 World Weightlifting Championships

added links pointing to Alexandr Ivanov, Michael Muller, Reena, Valentin Hristov, Peter Nagy and Gabriel Mena

List of weightlifters at the 2014 World Weightlifting Championships

added links pointing to Ivan Efremov, Kirill Pavlov, Sarah Davies, Peter Nagy, Hao Liu and Dmytro Chumak

List of weightlifters at the 2002 World Weightlifting Championships

added links pointing to Benjamin Turner, Lars Andersson, Santiago Martinez and Ivan Hernandez

José Luis Martínez (weightlifter)

added a link pointing to Gerona

Julio Idrovo

added a link pointing to Cuenca

Santiago Martínez (weightlifter)

added a link pointing to Gerona

Sarah Davies (weightlifter)

added a link pointing to Preston

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Thank you for adding so many female athlete bios in under-represented sports In ictu oculi (talk) 15:50, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Talk:List of cyclists with a cycling related death Archives

The previous title's Archive Talk:List of professional cyclists who died during a race/Archive 1 is now orphaned, could you please move it as well & fix any other archiving issues? Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 00:18, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Lorenzo Carrió

added a link pointing to Alzira

Mariusz Rytkowski

added a link pointing to Mińsk

Peter May (weightlifter)

added a link pointing to Enfield

Yury Myshkovets

added a link pointing to Znamenskoye

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of List of weightlifters at the 2011 World Weightlifting Championships for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of weightlifters at the 2011 World Weightlifting Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of weightlifters at the 2011 World Weightlifting Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 19:28, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Looks like they've all been closed as keep. Phew! Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 07:34, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

@Lugnuts: Yes I see, nice! Thanks for contributing :). I think these kind of lists are valuable for Wikipedia. Luckily some others agree with me. So I can continue creating these kind of lists :). Thanks, Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 07:39, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Agree. I'd hate to add the comment of "WP:ITSUSEFUL" at the AfD, but they are! Obviously if you can add more sources when they're created, it may reduce the need for someone to drag them to AfD. Great work - keep it up. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 07:41, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mónica Carrió, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alzira. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

Thanks for starting Khadijah Hunter page. I did a little bit of expanding but I feel you should try adding some more content if you can find. Thank you! :) Jim Carter 15:06, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Bosnia and Herzegovina national sitting volleyball team players

Hi, thanks for creating the lot of Bosnia and Herzegovina national sitting volleyball team players profile pages (like Safet Alibašić the one you created, and others). Help me dig up Sydney 2000 Paralympics results in sitting volleyball. I need the exact scores in each set. if not too much problem. I can not dig up any source. Keep up the good work. BiHVolim (talk) 14:48, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

@BiHVolim:, thanks for coming bye. Yes I created many paralympic volleyball players! But I'm not really into sitting volleyball. But see here for the men's sitting results and here for the men's standing results! Thanks in advance! Cheers :) Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 23:34, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

• • Btw, often worth adding the country tag {WP Poland} and so on, after {WP Biography} to new bio article Talk page. Cheers In ictu oculi (talk) 16:45, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. I have finalized two pages on english wikipedia: Bosnia and Herzegovina national sitting volleyball team and Iran men's national sitting volleyball team. If someone could create Germany, Egypt too that would be great! Base it on my template of Bosnian page as it has heaps of info there to get you (whomever) started. BiHVolim (talk) 10:24, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Project Volleyball: Filipino navbox discussion

You are cordially welcome to join us in this discussion about the new intricate Filipino Nav box. --Osplace 16:13, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Creation of articles of weightlifter personalities!!!!

Of late you have been creating a hoard of articles on weightlifters-who all share a common point-"participation in the 1999 world championships".You seem to provide very less data except that one particular info.Thus it would be kind of you to explain whether simple participation in a world championship suffices an encycloepadic entry for any person !!!!!Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 12:08, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

@ARUNEEK:, thanks for coming bye. I'm creating WP:Stubs, and indeed at the moment the weightlifters at the 1999 World Championships. By definition a stub is an article deemed too short to provide encyclopedic coverage of a subject. However they are valueble because the person can be found and something can be written about the person easily without going to the hassle of creating a new page. Note that I have created in the last year over 10,000 of these kind of pages. Some of which I don't have more info are only about the 1999 world championships. Others are longer, see for instance some I created this hour: Khodor Alaywan, Alexi Batista, Aleksandrs Žerebkovs, Kuanysh Rymkulov, Sergio Lafuente. For a good discussion about notability see: WP talk:Nsports#weightlifting. Cheers Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 12:25, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Thank you!!!Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 13:21, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Wikiproject infoboxes

Hey. I've been adding wikiproject boxes to your talk pages for the new articles you've been making for female weightlifters. Just to let you know I'm heading off for the day so i won't be getting any more of them done. Its pretty much a copy paste job if you don't mind doing it yourself to save someone the time of tracking them down later.  InsertCleverPhraseHere  12:56, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Volleyball infobox Number

According to Template:Infobox volleyball biography the number parameter is for the current club, not the national team. Thank you. --Osplace 13:50, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Christos Spyrou

added a link pointing to Panagiotis Spyrou

Meng Xianjuan

added a link pointing to Chiba

Sudhir Kumar Chitradurga

added a link pointing to Weightlifting

Yuriko Takahashi

added a link pointing to Niigata

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Tayler Sanders

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Tayler Sanders. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Tyler Sanders. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Tyler Sanders – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Theo649 (talk) 19:27, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

@Theo649:, Hi, thanks for noticing and letting me know. I made it a redirect. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 01:19, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

'Living people'

You put the category on the main space of new articles, please could you also back that up with minimally WP Biography|living=yes on the talk page at least, thanks JarrahTree 15:01, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Please note that in the past WP:BLP has been a serious issue, and any help in adding the requisite items is always appreciated JarrahTree 01:25, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

@JarrahTree:, it takes for me the same time to make the talk page then to make the page itself. The talk page is tagged automatically by a bot within a few days. With my limited WP time I prefer to create another page instead of adding tag on the talk page within the same time frame. If it's a serious issue, a boy could be created for it to do it :) Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 09:07, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Maria Fernanda Alvarez Zapata

Hi. You created the redirect Maria Fernanda Alvarez Zapata which goes to María Álvarez. María Álvarez is a Paralympic track athlete not a weightlifter. There doesn't seem to be an article on weightlifter. Tassedethe (talk) 15:39, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

@Tassedethe:, yes I see.. That's an error. I created the page of the weightlifter and made a disamb page. Thanks!!! Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 18:48, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:UHC2016riders

Template:UHC2016riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 22:20, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:TPO2013riders

Template:TPO2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 22:21, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:TIB2014riders

Template:TIB2014riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 22:21, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:PAC2016riders

Template:PAC2016riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 22:21, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:OPW2014riders

Template:OPW2014riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 22:21, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:OGE2016riders

Template:OGE2016riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 22:22, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:GPC2014riders

Template:GPC2014riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 22:22, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:GPC2013riders

Template:GPC2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 22:22, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:DNA2016riders

Template:DNA2016riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 22:22, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Faitoga Togagae

Hello Sander.v.Ginkel,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Faitoga Togagae for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Xx236 (talk) 13:14, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Africa/Asia

Hi, stubs are welcome for Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge. Some of your recent ones look like decent starts. Feel free to contribute! Asia needs to get off to a good start.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:03, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2016 UCI Road World Championships

added a link pointing to UCI

András Stark

added a link pointing to Tarján

Carla Garrett

added a link pointing to Athletics

Ivan Veselinov

added a link pointing to Kossovo

Jiří Zubrický

added a link pointing to Most

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:FEN2005riders

Template:FEN2005riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Primefac (talk) 03:19, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for helping

	Fixing the bias of History
	16% women on Wikipedia - We need to fix that and you are making a great contribution. You may have heard that the WiR wikiproject is a finalist for a UN-Women award - for this kind of work. A sample of your stubs are being tweeted at #wikiwomeninred. Thank you (on behalf of our g.daughters) for your efforts. Victuallers (talk) 12:00, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Wow.

		Moves like Kim Little Barnstar
		As a recipient of the Kim Little barnstar, we'd like to thank you for make amazing Kim Little-like contributions to articles related to women's football (soccer) and WP:WOSO. Thank you for your diligent work!

@Hmlarson:, thanks a lot for this!! I saw the women's football players are under represented on Wikipedia. I started with the players at the world championships. But also the players who competed at other major international competitions are notable. So, it's just the beginning and will create many many more! Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 07:53, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

You are awesome. Thanks very much. Hmlarson (talk) 15:37, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Lucie Záleská v. Lucie Hochmann

Two of yours; Lucie Záleská v. Lucie Hochmann ... same person? Fancy merging them? thanks

Also - have not checked if they're yours, but probably... Elizabeth Newell versus Elizabeth Hernandez (cyclist).

Finally Marta Pavlisová versus Marta Kroutilová. If you fancy doing anything with these three pairs, that'd be great. thanks --Tagishsimon (talk) 18:35, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

@Tagishsimon:, Great you spot them! I created 3 of the 4 cycling articles and merged them now. I didn't create the canoeists but will take a look at it tomorrow!! Please tell me if you find more :). Cheers and great work, Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 22:12, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

And good work yourself, SvG. Your duplicate rate is remarkably low considering the vast number of articles you create. They seem to end up at the bottom of the bucket of my work; I'll pass them to you as & when. I have one more dupe for your consideration (and forgive me for dumping them on you): Haïdy Aron v. Haydy Aron. thanks --Tagishsimon (talk) 22:18, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

@Tagishsimon: according to their names and the Spanish Wikipedia the canoeists are the same, so I merged them. But that means she became World Champion at the age of 13. Is that strange? And according to the Spanish page she would have medalled at European Championships at the age of 8. Is that possible? Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 13:55, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

That sounds a little, how shall we say, precocious. I presume we're looking at a DoB failure somewhere along the line, or maybe a mother-daugher thing. I'll do some digging.... this suggests a DoB of 1914. --Tagishsimon (talk) 15:18, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Indefinite article (again)

G'day again, I have just fixed a few instances of "a Australian" in articles recently-created by your good self. Cheers YSSYguy (talk) 02:04, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

@YSSYguy:, Thanks! I saw there was an error in the template I was using. It is fixed now :) Cheers, Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 15:51, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Better research

Hi! You added a small batch of Norwegian female footballers. Perhaps you should not have claimed that these players still play football, seeing as they are verging on age 40. Geschichte (talk) 18:17, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

40 is the new 32 (see Christie Rampone). Keep up the great work. Hmlarson (talk) 23:57, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

What about 50? Your templated articles are not unwarranted, Ginkel, but include preposterous claims. If you do not reply or change your editing, a short-term block would be in order. Geschichte (talk) 13:21, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

I'd be more inclined to short-term block someone who wanders around issuing short-term block ultimata. The sentences would be better in the past tense, but given the choice between an complete absence and a minor issue, I'll take SvG's article anytime. --Tagishsimon (talk) 14:13, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

@Geschichte:, sorry I totally missed your message. I just see it now. I fixed it in my template so it won't happen again :), Cheers, Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 15:50, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Another, much more serious, issue is that a whole lot (more than 20 at least, probably closer to 30) of these BLP articles have no references at all that actually mention the people the articles are about. Practically speaking, they're unreferenced BLPs. Claiming that 65-year-old people are active footballers is a smaller issue that is fairly easily fixed. Manxruler (talk) 00:49, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Cricketers and actresses

Thanks for starting this list. Browsing through the template at the foot of the article, I noticed the actressess list. I'm going to make a note of that and start work on that one. Lugnuts ^{Precious bodily fluids} 19:56, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

That would be greatly appreciated, Lugnuts. At the last count there were 34,585 actress records on wikidata for which we have no wikipedia biography. I'm kinda hoping that SvG will run short of sportspeople soon and turn his cannons on these :). --Tagishsimon (talk) 20:31, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

@Tagishsimon: No problem. I was just having a quick browse of the missing women articles last night and was quite surprised to see how much is actually missing. There's def. a couple of areas that interest me, and I'll chip away at the red. Lugnuts ^{Precious bodily fluids} 06:42, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Sander - I trust my edit summary for Kazimiera Utrata meets with the project's approval. Lugnuts ^{Precious bodily fluids} 11:45, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

@Lugnuts: great work on the acressess and cricketers!! And yes, the edit summary looks good! Hopefully it will stimulate some people :). @Tagishsimon: I have to say, that there are so many missing sportspersons.. With data I have at the moment I won't be finished within the first few years.. Haha. Keep up the good work! Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 07:27, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer granted

Hello Sander.v.Ginkel. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria.

• Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
• Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
• Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator.

 Administrator note You have been grandfathered to this group based on prior patrolling activity - the technical flag for the group will be added to your account after the next software update. You do not need to apply at WP:PERM. 20:56, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi, the women stubs count towards Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge, which you're very welcome to contribute to long term, or any of the other regional challenges. Keep up the good work!♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:25, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Esmost. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Văn Thị Thanh, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Є𐌔ⲘО𐌔𐍄 ^{𐍄𐌀ℓК} 21:09, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 3 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Thidarat Wiwasukhu page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Tiven2240. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Wim Ernes, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Tiven gonsalves 11:22, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Chinese Name

Google translate has almost 100% accuracy to translate Chinese name to English.--AddisWang (talk) 15:53, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Siti Noor Halimi Hussain

The article Siti Noor Halimi Hussain has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:NFOOTY (futsal national teams don't satisfy the international criteria) and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Yellow Dingo (talk) 21:57, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nur Izzati Khairudin

The article Nur Izzati Khairudin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:NFOOTY (futsal national teams don't satisfy the international criteria) and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Yellow Dingo (talk) 21:58, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Farahiyah Ridzuan

The article Farahiyah Ridzuan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:NFOOTY (futsal national teams don't satisfy the international criteria) and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Yellow Dingo (talk) 21:59, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:XSL2015riders

Template:XSL2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:10, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Water polo at the 2007 World Aquatics Championships – Men's team rosters

Could you please fix Water polo at the 2007 World Aquatics Championships – Men's team rosters. It has links to 24 different disambiguation pages. The Banner talk 09:08, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

It's fixed. [1] --Tagishsimon (talk) 13:43, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

The next one is Water polo at the 2007 World Aquatics Championships – Women's team rosters. You should really pay more attention to links to disambiguation pages, mr. Van Ginkel. The Banner talk 00:27, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

All bar one is now fixed. In the China table, Zheng Xu remains pointing to a DAB. --Tagishsimon (talk) 00:57, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sam Henderson (weightlifter)

The article Sam Henderson (weightlifter) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject appears to fail guidelines for biographical articles, specifically WP:BASIC and WP:ATH. Although a Google search did yield some references to the subject, they did not meet the standard for in depth coverage by multiple independent reliable sources. Found coverage appears to be far to brief and in some cases trivial to establish the encyclopedic notability of the subject. That said I have added this to my watch list as it is entirely possible that Mr. Henderson may at some point rise to that level.

The article creator is encouraged to peruse the linked guidelines and if additional sources exist that may lend themselves to establishing encyclopedic notability, please add them.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:53, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Sam Henderson (weightlifter) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sam Henderson (weightlifter) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Henderson (weightlifter) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:01, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

MOS:OPENPARA#Birth date and place

Per MOS:OPENPARA#Birth date and place: "Birth and death places, if known, should be mentioned in the body of the article, and can be in the lead if relevant to the person's notability, but they should not be mentioned in the opening brackets of the lead sentence alongside the birth and death dates." – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:31, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Heleri Saar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heleri Saar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heleri Saar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 14:20, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Geit Prants for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Geit Prants is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geit Prants until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 14:27, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Women's football articles - question

Hi Sander.v.Ginkel. Thanks again for your work in generating stub articles on women's footballers. Do you know of a way to automate tagging their talk pages with the Women's football taskforce? e.g., {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes|class=stub}} Hmlarson (talk) 04:59, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

@Hmlarson: Yes that is possible. That is what I did with other articles. Will make Work of it, but that wont be today. Cheers, Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 10:02, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you. Much appreciated. Hmlarson (talk) 17:07, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

User group: New Page Reviewr

Hello Sander.v.Ginkel.

Based on the patrols you made of new pages during a qualifying period in 2016, your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed.

New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

• Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
• Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
• Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Just a minor thingy...

Could you please change the name of the source ""2016–17 UCI Track Cycling World Cup (Glasgow) Enty List Men" and ""2016–17 UCI Track Cycling World Cup (Glasgow) Enty List Women"? Enty should be Entry. By the way, that source does not cover the type of race... The Banner talk 19:17, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

@The Banner:, oww, yes, that's a typo. All 16 pages fixed now. The page is the entry list of that World Cup round. What is different from the other source is that it lists the date of birth of the person. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 19:25, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Then I assume that the UCI-code is someting like landcode-dob-nr.? The Banner talk 19:32, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Yes, it is :) Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 19:32, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

@The Banner:, see 'UCI section' on page 1 at here. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 19:35, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Charly Conord

Good morning, can you do me a favour, please? I am not really used to the English WP. Conords name is "Charlie", because he is French and not English. In Apeldoorn I asked him and he told me that "Charly" is wrong. --Nicola (talk) 09:06, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

@Nicola:, sure. However I also can't move it over a redirect, so I placed a 'requested move' (see WP:Requested moves/Technical requests). Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 09:22, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Sander.v.Ginkel. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Kutuzova v Kutuzova

Grateful if you'd bring your full arsenal of obscure facts together to examine:

• Natalya Kutuzova, DoB 18 March 1975, water polo, Kazakhstan women's national water polo team.
• Natalia Kutuzova, DoB 18 March 1975, water polo, Russian water polo player, who won the bronze medal at the 2000 Summer Olympics.

thanks :) --Tagishsimon (talk) 18:35, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

@Tagishsimon: thanks for noticing. I merged the Information. But can you please explain what you mean with "obscure facts". Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 19:21, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

You know more about sportspeople that no-one else (recently) has heard of. Those, Sander, are obscure facts :) --Tagishsimon (talk) 19:22, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

@Tagishsimon:, haha, nice one :) Thanks Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 19:31, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sander.v.Ginkel. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Courtesy blanking

Please do not remove courtesy blanking from AFDs. It is only done when there are good reasons to do so, which may not be apparent to you from on-wiki discussions. Thanks. P.S. Your userpage looks like a WP:FAKEARTICLE. Could you please remove the lenghty content about your academic background per WP:USERBIO. SmartSE (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

@Smartse: But as is sould rare courtesy from Afds? In a list with the 3rd nominations the blanking was done without a reason >50% of the articles. While there are specific rules for, I removed some without a proper request. Why chaning my userpage?It is not a Wikipedia page, it's a userpage. Are there rules for? You can order my book if you want and you can all read about it The effect of exercise and ACE inhitibion on angiotensin II. PhD Thesis. May 2015 (UK edition) & April 2016 (NL edition). Literraly all the information of the Wikipedia page is pulished in it. It's even stated above the page This page is the user page of Sander van Ginkel and includes his short biography that is published in his PhD thesis named The effect of exercise and ACE inhibition on angiotensin II. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 14:03, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

I'm sorry but I can't understand your first question. If someone thought it necessary to blank an AFD it would have been for good reason and if you disagree, the first thing to do would be to ask the person who blanked it why they did it.

I'm aware that you userpage is not an article but it is styled in exactly the same way e.g. using {{infobox scientist}} which can lead to confusion and appears promotional. See WP:USERPAGE for the policy on what should and shouldn't be included on a userpage. Most simply, it is to write about yourself as a user here, not you as a person in the real world and at present it contains "excessive personal information unrelated to Wikipedia.". Whether it has been published in a book is immaterial. Can you please remove it? SmartSE (talk) 17:17, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

For the confusing I placed the banner on top of the page. I don't see that it is not allowed to use the infobox scientist. And I think the Information is not excessive, it is a short summary. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 08:37, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Africa Challenge

Hi, can you find a way to update the list here with flags for as many countries as possible?♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:48, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

@Dr. Blofeld: Is there a way that (new) articles are listed with their categories? I now a bot lists for many projects the new pages on the basis of the categories. If I could get that it would be possible :) Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 13:01, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter

Hello Sander.v.Ginkel,

Breaking the back of the backlog

We now have 804 New Page Reviewers! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog. Now it's time for action.

Mid July to 01 Oct 2016

If each reviewer does only 10 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
Let's get that over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.

Second set of eyes

Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work. Read about it at the new Monitoring the system section in the tutorial.

Getting the tools we need - 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey: Please vote

With some tweaks to their look, and some additional features, Page Curation and New Pages Feed could easily be the best tools for patrollers and reviewers. We've listed most of what what we need at the 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey. Voting starts on 28 November - please turn out to make our bid the Foundation's top priority. Please help also by improving or commenting on our Wishlist entry at the Community Wishlist Survey. Many other important user suggestions are listed at at Page Curation.

---

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC) .

Speedy deletion nomination of Shyamala Shetty

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Shyamala Shetty, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do, and take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PageImp (talk) 10:56, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

File:2016 Shahroud train accident.jpg and others

Best Sander,

please crop the black margin before uploading.--Recent contributor (talk) 10:36, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

@Recent contributor: Sorry, but I thought Commons want that always the original image is uploaded. As I only have a telepone this days, I don't know I am able to change them all. Will see what I can do :). Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 10:40, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

@Recent contributor: All solved :) Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 11:02, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

FYI

Hi Sander, here are some more photos: [2]. I read that you were born in Woerden. I was there once many years ago to make an interview with Arie van Vliet :) --Nicola (talk) 19:47, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

@Nicola: Yeah, great images!! Verry nice :). I started already tagging some yesterday, and linking the Commons categories to Wikipedia pages. Yes, that's right! I was born in Woerden, and now I'm living there again. You should come back for an interview with Ellen van Dijk or Floortje Mackaij :). Cheers, Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 22:47, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Now I loaded up some 15 photos, where I do not know the names, but I am researching :) Or may be you can help me?

I made this interview with Arie van Vliet for a historical book about cycling. Ellen and Floortje are not yet old enough :) But I wrote this: [3].

By the way: Except from cycling I write a lot of articles about the Netherlands during the occupation 1940-45. --Nicola (talk) 22:58, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

@Nicola: A I see, nice you're wring historical books :)! Great you wrote the German article :D (I wrote most of the English one, but have to continue I say as it is a bit outdated). I will take a look at the images. Looks like Asian people ;) Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 23:05, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

@Nicola: I found a few with a bit of research. A question: this is Kang Shih Feng (sprint / keirin). If this is another person it's Chen Chien-Liang (Scratch, Points Race, Omnium), otherwise it's also Kang Shih Feng. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 23:24, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Yes, but I am not sure. I wrote some emails to some people.

Why did you not go to Apeldoorn? --Nicola (talk) 23:27, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

@Nicola:Yes sorry.. I really wanted to go, but I didn't have time to go last weekend. A shame.. But I saw it all in Rio at the Olympics :). I just started creating pages of the medalists of the World Cup. However, every participant meets WP:NCYC, so if you want an article by certain images, let me know! Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 23:45, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

@Nicola:, I just started eight pages with your images :). Louis Pijourlet, Adrien Garel, Gerben Thijssen, Bayley Simpson, Mark Downey, Sultanmurat Miraliyev, Han Jun and Liu Lili. Good night, Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 00:08, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I just saw that you added "Liu Xialing" to one photo, because there were 3 chinese females starting in Apeldoorn. But: I have at least photos of FOUR Chinese females there. It seems that they took some riders from Glasgow to there, but they did not start. May be there is also one more, and may be it is Ma Menglu. Anyway, "Liu Xiaoling" has dots in here face and she cannot be the more pretty one... I am still researching, but it is not easy.... --Nicola (talk) 07:59, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

@Nicola: I thought that the entry list was always longer then the actual participants. Well as you showed.. It's not! Thanks for noticing :). And a question to you, a few months ago I uploaded some images of some Iranian cyclists. Do you maybe know some of them? See Commons:Category:2014 Iran national track cycling championships. Thanks, Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 11:33, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Well, I noticed in Apeldoorn that there were always a lot of riders hanging around in the box but did not seem to be participating :) And it was obvious they were bored. I already thought then that may be they were not allowed to stay in the hotel on their own? I do not know any Iranians, but will have a look. --Nicola (talk) 11:44, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Womens footballer from China; Asian Month Suggestion

Hi, since Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Asian Month is semi-protected now, I post the following; you requested to put Asian characters romanized, and here they are. I'm not a native Chinese, but since Japanese share the same writing system (but we use traditional Chinese characters), I thought I could give you a hand.

It seems zh:中国国家女子足球队#中國女足23人名单： includes good number of those which I marked with $s.

I referred to that and found the traditional Chinese for a name. Copy/paste a name into the box and clicked the farthest left button under the box. Sometimes your search on the web hits the target since Taiwanese media (at times HongKong, too) uses traditional Chinese characters.

BTW, would you mind to test Google translate or Wikipedia translation, by copy/paste a name and see what they give output? Most of the following, I used Google translate; by copy/paste names into the left box (Google translate), it shows below the box in gray the pronunciation. Hope those below will help you.

China

Nation / Name / simplified character = romanized / traditional character / $ (zh:中国国家女子足球队#中國女足23人名单：)

• China - 张越 = Zhāng Yuè 張越 $
• China - 王飞 = Wáng Fēi 王飛 $
• China - 王诗朦 = Wáng Shīméng 王詩朦
• China - zh:刘杉杉 = Liú Shānshān 劉杉杉
• China - 李佳悦 = Lǐ Jiāyuè 李佳悦 $
• China - zh:吴海燕 = Wú HǎiYàn 呉海燕
• China - 李冬娜 = Lǐ Dōngnà 李冬娜 $
• China - 王珊珊 = Wáng Shānshān 王珊珊 $
• China - 庞丰月 = Páng Fēngyuè 龐豐月/龐豊月 $
• China - 高琦 = Gāo Qí 高琦
• China - zh:王霜 = Wáng Shuāng 王霜
• China - zh:唐佳丽 = Táng Jiālì 唐佳麗
• China - 韩鹏 = Hánpéng 韓鵬 $
• China - 谭茹殷 = Tán Rúyīn 譚茹殷
• China - zh:王丽思 = Wáng Lìsī 王麗思
• China - 任桂辛 = Rèn Guìxīn $
• China - 李影 = Lǐ Yǐng 李影
• China - 赵容 = Zhào Róng 趙容 $
• China - 雷佳慧 = Léi Jiāhuì 雷佳慧 $
• China - 娄佳惠 = Lóu Jiāhuì 婁佳惠/婁佳恵 $
• China - zh:古雅沙 = Gǔyǎ Shā 古雅沙
• China - 杨丽 = Yáng Lì 楊麗

--Omotecho (talk) 06:09, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Miloš Marković (water polo)

A link to a disambiguation, wrong.Xx236 (talk) 13:10, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Mirjam Overdam

No interwiki. Xx236 (talk) 12:47, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

@Xx236: I created many more water polo stubs, probably more orphans (and will create more). That's because of incomplete Olympic water polo sqad pages and missing squad pages (see here) and/or incomplete Olympic nations pages. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 13:01, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

@Xx236: However, Mirjam Overdam is not an orphan, see here. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 13:02, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

I don't mean orphan but Interwiki (another languages). I have linked this page.Xx236 (talk) 13:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

@Xx236:, Ahh, sorry for the confusion. Thanks for doing so! I will check the other and upcoming articles :). Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 13:11, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Template:Women in Red

I undid your change. I can't find it in me to like the parentheses around sprinters, and around the whole list, in your version. The logic of the existing version was to start with Sportswomen, as a kind of list header which coincidently is a list name, and then show all of the sports in alpha order. With no parentheses, and certainly not with two levels of nested parentheses. "All are sportswomen and Sprinters are Athletes" may well be the case, but "you've made the list ugly for no tangible gain" is as easy to argue :) --Tagishsimon (talk) 06:10, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Fram

As Fram (talk · contribs) is screening my edit history and post every he don't like, I made a seperate page. See User talk:Sander.v.Ginkel/Fram. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 10:56, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Which is your right. Hiding the notice that you posted a copyright violation on another page without bothering to reply doesn't make the problem go away of course. Edit warring to include wrong information on pages, or to reinstate posts by banned editors on my talk page, also isn't solved this way. Again, this isn't about "things I don't like", but about "things you are not allowed to do on Wikipedia". Fram (talk) 12:54, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

I'll second this. I've read all that Fram has had to say to you and it has all been important advice. WP:BLP and WP:V aren't optional and the edit warring on Fram's talk page was vindicative and childish. Fram has taken the time to point out the problems with your edits and the sensible and mature thing would be to follow the advice and modify your editing, not have a tantrum and move the advice to a subpage. SmartSE (talk) 13:07, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

@Smartse: if you would have read everything, you would have seen I've improved a lot, including the points Fram was raising. Tell me what I should do more. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 13:15, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

I was referring to your attitude towards Fram's advice rather than whether you had followed it or not. Until know I hadn't inspected many articles you had created myself, but looking at Sherly Jeudy which you created today I see exactly the same problems: no source for the date of birth, that she is a midfielder or that she plays for FC Indiana. Benedicte Hubbel also has the same problems (other than her position is cited). The solution is simple - cite where you obtained the information if it is a reliable source or else do not include it. I find the unsourced dates of birth particularly troublesome as this can have real world consequences. SmartSE (talk) 13:34, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

E.g. Sarah Melgire, which you created today. The date of birth (1 March 1995) is not sourced. Soccerway[4] gives it as 20 August 1991. The date in your article may be right anyway, I don't know, but as it stands you added an unsourced, probably incorrect date of birth. Fram (talk) 14:13, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Might be another persons, or an error somewhere. See for instance here with 1 March 1995. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 14:27, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Another Sarah Melgire who played in the 2014 national team matches? Seems rather unlikely. Soccerdonna, certainly on that page, comes across as much less reliable, as it has no info on Melgire's career whatsoever. Anyway, it's these kind of things that make it necessary that you include a source from the start, so people at least can see where you got the date. Otherwise, in the event that someone checks the date, they will simply replace your unsourced date with the different soccerway date instead of showing the discrepancy between the sources. Fram (talk) 14:39, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Sherly Jeudy, already mentioned above: this one seems to have the wrong (or at least a dubious) date of birth as well. Fram (talk) 14:47, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

And Schmid Charles. That's 3 out of your last 6 article creations. Fram (talk) 14:51, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

The data came from women's national football team, but gives now an 404 error, so I couldn't use it in the article. You can still view it at some cache websites, including showing the club teams. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 14:55, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

I hope you haven't been using that source for ages and countless articles, but only just now! Revolvy is a Wikipedia mirror, so the dates of birth you found there are the dates of birth from the Martinique women's national football team article here. Revolvy is not a reliable source and should never be used on Wikipedia. Fram (talk) 15:06, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

I have data exported from that website (in January 2015), I didn't notice it was a mirror website. I see I have used info from that website for 5 pages I created, all today. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 15:21, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Challenges

Hi, can you put entries you start up on the various Template:The 100,000 Challenge pages? Perhaps do them in batches if easier!♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:01, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

@Dr. Blofeld: Oww.. yes, that's a bit difficult. I mostly created bunch of articles by sport and not by location. I was willing to get all the African weightlifters I created, but it was such a difficult task. I had to go through them one-by-one. So sorry, I have to say that I'm not able to do it.. I can get a list of articles I created since a specific date, also by sport, but not by location. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 21:29, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:2014UCIWomenTeams

Template:2014UCIWomenTeams has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 23:03, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:GIW2014riders

Template:GIW2014riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 23:04, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:ARW2013riders

Template:ARW2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 23:05, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Possible help?

I read a posting between you and Ipigott on WiR about Estonians and am hoping one of you can help. Megalibrarygirl and I have an aviator, who did several firsts, but I can't figure out what her name should be in English. Some sources say she is Estonian, others Russian, and one says Latvian. Yes, I get that Estonia (and Latvia) was part of Russia at various times, but I don't know what to call her or how to spell her name. If she is Estonian, seems likely it would be Ljuba rather than the Russian Lyubov, but given how she wrote her last name, I tend to think we should disregard other spellings and go with what she wrote. Or am I crazy?

• Ljuba Galantchikov Estonian? [5]
• Lyubov Golanchikova Russian? [6]
• Lyubov Golanchikova Russian? [7] page 27
• Lioubov Golantchikova Russian? [8]
• L. Galanschikoff looks to be her signature here: [9] close up: [10]
• Ljuba Galanschikoff [11]
• Luba Galanschikoff Russian [12]
• Lioubov Galantchikova, Latvian [htp://www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia/1913-photo-ljuba-galanschikoff-female-pilot]

Russian Wiki just says Russian empire. [13] The French article uses a Russo-French spelling. Help would be greatly appreciated. User:SusunW (talk) 02:23, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

@SusunW:, Hi and thanks for coming bye and raising the issue. I'm not an expert on Russian language but I had several times the same problem. Translating names in Russian to the Latin script can be done in several ways. Where in English is written a 'v' can also be written a 'w' like the Polish Wikipedia does. She might even have written it herself in more then one way... If you end up with a few names you can start the article with

Name also written as Name2, Name3 and Name4 was a Russian born(?) Estonian aviator.

(Or something like this). To make it even a bit more confusing, during the Cold War Russia was the Soviet Union. Maybe people at Wikipedia:WikiProject Russia can help you better? Thanks, Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 08:49, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

@SusunW and Megalibrarygirl: Transliteration from Russian is always a problem as there are different systems for equivalents in the various European languages, generally based on pronounciation. For example Putin becomes Poutine in French. Family names ending in -ov sometimes remain invariable for women in English, especially for immigrants and children of immigrants born abroad, but generally become -ova for women. In this case, I would not include the Dutch or Latvian spellings. I would go for Lyubov Golanchikova as she was in fact born in St Petersburg although she flew in Riga. I think you may have misinterpreted the handwritten signature. It looks to me like Galantchikoff but that is no doubt the Latvian (or even German) phonetic equivalent of her name. The ending -off for Russian names is not common in English. (See here for modern transliteration conventions.) So why not go for Lyubov Golanchikova, also Ljuba Galantchikoff,... and include other variants as redirects if you wish. Wikidata already has Lyubov Golanchikova for English. I also see she emigrated to USA and was a taxi driver in New York City (where she died) which means there must be an official American spelling of her name. I'm pretty sure it's Lyubov Golanchikova. A fuller form seems to be Lyubov A. Golanchikova (The "A" stands for the patronym Alexandrovna which is used in Russian but not in English.) I'm sure your research has also revealed that as a teenager she was a Vaudeville singer and actress using the name Molly Moore (Russian Мили Море or Молли Мор). Hope this helps. I look forward to seeing the article and perhaps contributing a bit to it myself.--Ipigott (talk) 11:12, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

@Sander.v.Ginkel and Ipigott: I found a ton of newspaper articles about her in the US press — Luba Phillips. LOL Those that give her maiden name call her Galanschikoff or Galanchikoff. [14], [15], [16], [17] Obviously, I have enough stuff to write about her, if I could just decide what to call the article. I agree she was born in St. Petersburg and may well have been of Estonian or Latvian heritage, but I think we have no real proof of that. So, I shall do it with the Russian spelling. And yes, I would love your help Ian. No possible way I could read other than her name in that Dutch newspaper article and I am sure you have access to sources I don't. Megalibrarygirl, in the timeline, I'm gonna make it Lyubov Golanchikova. SusunW (talk) 14:06, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

@SusunW: (Sorry for taking so much space on your page, SvG.) So after all that, she just ended up as plain Luba Phillips on her air club card or even L. Phillips on her taxi badge. But it should probably have been L. Phillipoff as her husband was Boris Phillipoff (but his name was probably changed to Phillips on Staten Island). Lots of interesting detail in the article on "The Flying Ballerina". Interesting too that she was a ballet dancer, not a Vaudeville singer. See also [18]. Also some interesting details here including her working in a beauty parlour. Quite an exotic woman!--Ipigott (talk) 14:52, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

This Russian article clearly identifies her as a popular singer in Petersburg rather than a ballet dancer.--Ipigott (talk) 15:09, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Ipigott I have started her here. User:SusunW/Lyubov Golanchikova Please feel free to jump in. I too apologize for taking up so much space on your page SvG but do appreciate the help. She is fascinating. SusunW (talk) 15:46, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

SusunW Yes, really fascinating. I'll wait until you're in bed and return to it tomorrow morning my time.--Ipigott (talk) 17:09, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

@SusunW: and @Ipigott: no problem at all! I just love these kind of conversations :). I would just say ask more, whatever you want :) Article is becoming great! Started reading of it. And yes, we do need more of these women on Wikipedia. Cheers, Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 23:13, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:SKI2012riders

Template:SKI2012riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 00:19, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 December 3, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. The Banner talk 00:18, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Well I pointed to a contradiction in your nomination. I replied to it. Please see here. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 19:33, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Disliking a nomination does not give you the right to fiddle with my edits. The Banner talk 21:44, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:GPC2012riders

Template:GPC2012riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 00:42, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:TIB2012riders

Template:TIB2012riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 10:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:GEW2012riders

Template:GEW2012riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 10:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Team templates

You are creating many cycling team templates, and many get nominated for deletion. You give as reasons "minimize storage space", which is not a valid reason (WMF policy is that we shouldn't worry about storage at all and that that shouldn't come into play when editing) and minimize maintenance. As has been said at the deletion discussions, how much maintenance do 2010 squads need? You say "collect source text used in several articles", but as far as I can see, these are only used on one page (e.g. List of 2010 UCI Women's Teams and riders), so you don't decrease maintenance or storage space and don't really collect anything, you just remove information from the article directly and put it into a template, making it harder for non-veteran editors to edit when needed (which like I said won't be often if ever). I see no benefit at the moment from all these templates. A disadvantage though is that a page like List of 2010 UCI Women's Teams and riders now has many more "edit" links and many unecessary and distracting "view" links inserted into it (and a needless repetition of things like "ages as of January 2010, which you could otherwise have stated only once).

Another disadvantage, as can be seen in that article, is that at the mopment you have the same link to [19] with one description on 21 templates, and another description on 5 other templates. If the squads had been on the page instead of on a template, you would have had one named reference. Now you have to edit either 5 or 21 templates to give them all the same description, which means that your efforts have actually increased the maintenance needed, not decreased.

Please stop creating further such templates until it has been established that they really are beneficial. Fram (talk) 12:29, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

I'm still working on the templates. And well these kinds of templates are not new at all. So I think I should stop creating such templates until it has been established that they really are not beneficial. However, I prefer having this discussion in one place. Please leave your comment at WP:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 December 3#Template:GIW2014riders. Thanks, Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 13:14, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

I copied my post there. Fram (talk) 13:42, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:TCW2011riders

Template:TCW2011riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 14:42, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:TIB2010riders

Template:TIB2010riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 22:37, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:GPC2010riders

Template:GPC2010riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 22:37, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

List of 2011 UCI Women's Teams and riders

You have now undone improvements to List of 2011 UCI Women's Teams and riders twice times, each time reintroducing factual errors to the page. No matter if these templates are kept or not, no one is under any obligation to use them. Reverting to an inferior version because it is your version is WP:OWNing a page, which is not allowed. Stop. Fram (talk) 05:38, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Reverting because there is not yet a consensus. In your opinion it's an improvement. Like I stated on your talk page, it's common to wait to start such an edit before a consensus is reached. As an administrator you should know better. Factual errors, you mean probably the tiny errors that have already been fixed? Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 08:14, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

When I reverted this morning, there were still "tiny" errors in it. When I state that you are "reintroducing factual errors", I don't mean things that you have fixed, but things you haven't fixed, obviously. And again, the consensus at the template discussions can force us to use my solution, but it can never force us not to use my solution. If the templates are kept, anyone can and may still substitute them in the articles and edit like I did. Fram (talk) 08:25, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

I'm happy I could have learned you, by showing it, what LST is. Probably you understand it now better :) Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 09:04, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Why are you reintroducing some templates in the article? I get the edits you made for LST, I get why the one template up for deletion is readded, but this seems pointless reverting for no actual benefit at all. Fram (talk) 09:36, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

The templates are used in several pages. When you copied content from the templates to the page, you didn't copy all the information and better references. As it took too much time to check them all I started linking them back to the templates so LST can be carried out with just a few clicks when I've done so. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 09:47, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

???Which information or reference was lost from e.g. Lotto-Honda Team? You changed the access date, that's it. Fram (talk) 09:56, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Maybe not from that one, but from other I did before I had to put the information back manualy. As I didn't want to do that for all the others, I started doing it this way. (This was also why I asked you several times not to do copy and paste the content.). Will link this first bunch with LST. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 10:08, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

I did not copy-paste any content, I substituted the template, which means that everything gets included automatically. So, please indicate on which ones I hadn't copied all the information? Fram (talk) 10:10, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Comparing my last version with your current version[20], it turns out that, as I expected, your claim that "important info was not copied", "you didn't copy all the information", "I had to put the information back manualy" was all a load of crap. On the contrary, you introduced a link to the 2012 Dolmans team on this 2011 teams page. Good grief... Fram (talk) 10:16, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Well the first templated did. For instance from Template:DLT2011riders: That the content is As of 1 January 2011 and the reference <ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cyclingarchives.com/ploegfiche.php?id=16644|title=Dolmans - Boels Cycling Team 2011|accessdate=15 February 2013|work=cyclingarchives.com}}</ref> and from Template:TCW2011riders the reference: Source<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cyclingarchives.com/ploegfiche.php?id=16444|title=2011 Roster|accessdate=15 February 2013|work=cyclingarchives.com}}</ref>. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 10:19, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

@Fram:,this is realy rude! You can't talk to someone like this in a conversation. I point out some things that you did do not correct. You shouldn't start talking like that what I say is a load of crap. I put a lot of time and effort in getting all the information of the riders on Wikipedia, and the only thing you can do is shoot at it, shoot at it, and when you shoot miss you start talking like you're still right. In your position as an administratot you should not behave in this manner. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 10:29, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

No, in my position as administrator I should block you as a continuously disruptive editor. Sadly, I'm involved so I'm not allowed to do that. Yuo did not point out anything I did not do correct before my "crap" post, you just stated that I did some things incorrectly, but when I asked what was wrong about one thing, you just said "oh, not that one, but others, surely, somewhere, perhaps, you know...". Now you have finally given examples: "That the content is As of 1 January 2011"? Thank you for that very nice example of why the non-templated version was better than your templated one. Just look at the top of the teams, underneath the section header "Riders". That the info is for 1 January 2011 only needs to be said once, not over and over again. So that information wasn't lost... And you simply repeat the "Dolmans" link here, even though I told you already, right above your reply, that it links to the 2012 page, not the 2011 page: "Dolmans - Boels Cyclingteam 2012" is the title for a reason. So yes, a load of crap. Again. As is way too often the case. Fram (talk) 10:43, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

The stament as as of 1 January 2011 is important so it shows that the riders who joined or left the team during the season are not listed. When all the information is accurate as of 31 December 2011 this information could be left out. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 10:49, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:GPC2011riders

Template:GPC2011riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 22:37, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

@The Banner:, please nominate in one nomination all of the templates, instead of every few hours a few. Or will I receive >250 of these kind of messages the upcoming days? Lot easier for both and the whole community :) Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 22:40, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

It would be far better that you stop making those templates and await the faith of them instead of completely ignoring the ongoing discussions. Beside that, I only respond to the templates showing up at Templates with disambiguation links. So it is clear to see that you have created another three templates with links to disambiguation pages instead of proper links. Accuracy, Sir, accuracy! The Banner talk 22:45, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

By adding a huge amount of links, I don't check every link to see it's a disamb. link. A bot reports them to me so I can quickly repair them. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 09:30, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

I suggest that you add the following to your "Custom CSS" (under preferences, appearance)

/* visualisation of redirects and links to disambiguation pages */
.mw-redirect { background-color:#F5DEB3; }
.mw-disambig { background-color:#AFEEEE; }

It gives redirects and links to disambiguation pages a background colour, so they will be easily recognisable. The Banner talk 12:40, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

@The Banner: this is great! But I only don't know how to work with Custom CSS, I'm not working with it. Can you show me how to use it, or a link? Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 12:46, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

@The Banner: I created this User:Sander.v.Ginkel/common.css, will that help? Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 12:48, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

No, that will not work. What you need is to go to your "preference"-page, go to the tab "appearance". You will see 4 different skins there, with one selected. Most likely you have the skin "Vector", behind that is a red link "Custom CSS". You have to add the info in there. The Banner talk 12:55, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Well actualy, @The Banner: it did work :)! This is amazing. It shows me with different colors redirects and links to disamb pages. The first disamb link at Jaqson Kojoroski to Descanso was prevented. Thanks for letting me know. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 13:45, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Just stop. This is yet another example of you being disruptive through carelessness. You add links and just hope that they are the correct ones? Really? And you then only correct those that get flagged by disambig bot, and don't bother to check the others? This, again, is really bad editing, but from your reply here seems to be your standard approach. Fram (talk) 09:43, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Former

Why do you list all these handball players (and many other sporting stubs you create) as "former" players? Without good evidence for such a claim, you better simply not include it. E.g. Mahmoud Hassaballah seems to be still active at the highest level, and many older players may still be active at lower levels. Please don't include things you can't source and haven't checked. Fram (talk) 13:47, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

@Fram:, yes I did that because I didn't see they were part of a handball team in the last at least 5 years. But because you're right that they may still be active at lower levels I will change it. Good point and I will remove it from the articles I created. I will keep He was part of the national team as the current national squads are not listing the person. In doubt I link the the sentence with the notable event he/she competed in (He was part of the national team that competed at the ..). Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 13:54, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. The link you provide only shows national team appearances at the Olympics, so you can't use it to check whether someone still plays at club level or not (or even whether they still play for the national team!). Fram (talk) 14:02, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

What I did check was if the player was on the current national squad (like Egypt national handball team), and so I noticed that Mohamed Ramadan (handballer) is the same peson as Mahmoud Ramadan and that Ahmed El-Ahmar also competd at the 2008 Summer Olympics. Besides from that I checked for incoming links. For example it appears that Jaqson Kojoroski was part of team at the Handball at the 2011 Pan American Games – Men's team rosters and won the gold medal at the Handball at the 2007 Pan American Games. For this example, am I allowed to add the person in the category e.g. Category:Handball players at the 2007 Pan American Games? Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 14:14, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

You should never have categories which aren't supported by the article proper. So for Kojoroski, you should add text about his participation at the 2007 Games before (or when) you add the category. While it isn't absolutely required that you add a reliable source for this as well, it is of course better if you do this. Relying solely on what another Wikipedia article claims is not a good idea, as Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Fram (talk) 14:22, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Yes I understand. You learned me not to copy information from other Wikipedia, and I got myself in troubles with it, I won't copy the information that he was part of the Pan American teams (even when it is assumable he was). I'll also stop adding this kind of categories to the persons page. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 14:28, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected

New Page Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC))

LA CIRCASSIENNE AU BAIN EDIT

Dear Mr Ginkel,

The edit which you have effected on the above page creates an impression which is entirely factually incorrect. Firstly, the image labelled '1823 engraving' is in fact, an approximate ILLUSTRATION of an engraving, which was used to illustrate a discussion of the appearance of the painting at the Louvre in 1814. The illustration appeared in the 'Almanach des Dames' in 1823. The actual engraving, from which the 1823 illustration was derived, and from which the more recent 'copy after' by John Parker obtained a cartoon drawing, was an entirely different work by the well known French engraver - Tavernier. Tavernier's engraving was published in 1819, after having been exhibited in it's own right, in the Louvre exhibition of 1819. As a person who seemingly devotes a great deal of their time to ensuring the accuracy of Wikipedia articles, I feel sure that you wouldn't wish your error to remain in public view for too long. Kindest regards An art lover. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.12.39.176 (talk) 09:16, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

@80.12.39.176:, thank you for your kind respons. I didn't know all this information. I see you are way more into it then I am. Do you mind if I copy what you wrote to the Image on Commons so it's clear for everyone what this image is about. I added it to the article because the original image is lost and there is not an image of the original image only copies. So when having tho different copies of the image, the reader will get a better impression how the original image should have been. I list severel differences between the engraving and the other copy. Do you know which of the two is more accurate? Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 09:24, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Dear Mr Ginkel, And my apologies to you for assuming that it was a malicious edit! You know how it is with your own areas of specialist interest, one can often wrongly assign 'general knowledge' status to information which is really quite obscure! Yes, the 1819 Tavernier engraving, which was reprinted throughout the 19th century (examples do come up for sale quite regularly) is likely to have been a very accurate monochrome representation of the original, given that it was accepted for exhibition at the Louvre in 1819, only five years after the original painting by Blondel had been exhibited there. The 1823 Delpech illustration for the 'Almanach des Dames' really was a rough approximation, intended principally as a visual reminder to the readership of the painting in question.

I have read john Parker's extensive research summary, connected to the reproduction, which is why, out of courtesy, I reinstated the caption copy 'after blondel' below the image. In his research, Parker both illustrates and explains how he used the Tavernier engraving to make a full sized cartoon drawing. He also went into great detail regarding the research into Blondel's pigments etc, but that's another issue! Yes, please do feel free to use any of this information in any way you think would be of benefit to Wikipedia. Kindest regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.12.39.176 (talk) 09:57, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fritz Haffer has been accepted

Fritz Haffer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 17:20, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karl Haffer has been accepted

Karl Haffer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 17:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Willi Zacharias has been accepted

Willi Zacharias, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bradv 17:27, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alfred Höchsmann has been accepted

Alfred Höchsmann, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bradv 17:28, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fritz Halmen (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fritz Halmen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bradv 17:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Sander.v.Ginkel, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bradv 17:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Willi Kirschner (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Willi Kirschner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bradv 17:39, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Ahlemeyer (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:William Ahlemeyer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bradv 17:40, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:William Ahlemeyer has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:William Ahlemeyer. Thanks! Bradv 17:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edward Hagen has been accepted

Edward Hagen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 17:45, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Walter Bowden has been accepted

Walter Bowden, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bradv 17:45, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:UnitedStates-handball-bio-stub (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Template:UnitedStates-handball-bio-stub and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bradv 17:46, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles Dauner has been accepted

Charles Dauner, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bradv 17:47, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joe Kaylor has been accepted

Joe Kaylor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bradv 17:48, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Please stop creating more articles whilst the WP:ANI discussion continues

As people on the discussion have said, you are still creating articles without good sources. Please stop now until the discussion is concluded. Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 10:42, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

@Black Kite: it would have been fair if I was noticed about this ‎proposal. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 11:58, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

You started the discussion on WP:ANI yourself, so it is unsurprising that no-one notified you. Black Kite (talk) 12:41, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

@Black Kite: yes I understand, but after the statements Fram made about me I never noticed there was a proposal against me going on. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 12:43, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

So you file a case at AN/I but do follow it afterwards? Unfortunately, it is becoming a big boomerang. The Banner talk 12:46, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Please also stop creating redirects and templates in draft space. These cannot be approved through WP:AFC, and only serve to plug up an already backlogged system. Bradv 17:51, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fred Leinweber (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fred Leinweber and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bradv 17:53, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry Oehler has been accepted

Henry Oehler, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bradv 17:53, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Willy Renz has been accepted

Willy Renz, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bradv 21:04, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alfred Rosesco has been accepted

Alfred Rosesco, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bradv 21:14, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edmund Schallenberg has been accepted

Edmund Schallenberg, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bradv 21:14, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bo Andersson (handballer) has been accepted

Bo Andersson (handballer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bradv 21:15, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Javier Cabanas has been accepted

Javier Cabanas, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bradv 21:15, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jovica Cvetković has been accepted

Jovica Cvetković, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bradv 21:16, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Otto Oehler has been accepted

Otto Oehler, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bradv 21:16, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Herbert Oehmichen has been accepted

Herbert Oehmichen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bradv 21:17, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gerard Yantz has been accepted

Gerard Yantz, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bradv 21:17, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mounir Jelili has been accepted

Mounir Jelili, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bradv 21:17, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Randt (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter Randt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bradv 21:18, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Juan Francisco Muñoz Melo has been accepted

Juan Francisco Muñoz Melo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bradv 21:19, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Ahlemeyer has been accepted

William Ahlemeyer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bradv 21:19, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fred Leinweber has been accepted

Fred Leinweber, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bradv 21:19, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter #2

Hello Sander.v.Ginkel,

Please help reduce the New Page backlog

This is our second request. The backlog is still growing. Your help is needed now - just a few minutes each day.

Getting the tools we need

ONLY TWO DAYS LEFT TO VOTE

• Improve the tools: Vote here.
• Reduce your review load: Vote here

---

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC) .

Dupe?

Khadidra Debesette vs Khadidra Debessette --Tagishsimon (talk) 13:37, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

@Tagishsimon:, thanks, yes it is. I merged it into Khadidra Debesette and stating that her name can be written two ways. Thanks, Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 13:45, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

No probs; thank you. :) --Tagishsimon (talk) 13:46, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Your AFC Submissions

I believe I have now approved all your AFC submissions, except for those which already exist (and you've been notified of those).

Can you please go back through all of them and move the redirects (or tag them for deletion)? There is no point in creating draft redirects, as they just result in doubles as soon as the article gets approved (and there's no way to approve redirects in AFC anyway).

I strongly recommend that we do not go this way in the future (automated submissions to AFC are a bad idea!) However, it is determined at AN/I that this will be the approach, please do not create templates or redirects in draft space. Also, let me know when you submit the articles (and maybe leave a list for me somewhere so I don't have to hunt), and I can approve them without tagging them as biographies and creating redundant defaultsorts and categories.

If there is another AFC reviewer who is going to review them for you instead, let them know of my comments here. Thank you. Bradv 21:26, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

@Brad: thanks for doing them all! I moved the redirects to the main space. The articles I created yesterday I didn't put in the AfC. They can be viewed at User:Sander.v.Ginkel/drafts waiting for approval. They only have to be moved, if approved, to the main space. I don't think it's a good idea I do it myself, as the people told me not to create in the main space. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 12:42, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

There does not appear to be a consensus at AN/I about you having to go through AFC for your new articles. (However, there is a lot of feedback there about your editing, which I trust you've read).

Please go ahead and move your new articles into main space. Since you're not autopatrolled anymore, those articles will get reviewed at Special:NewPagesFeed. Bradv 14:01, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

UnitedStates-handball-bio-stub?

Why are you creating {{UnitedStates-handball-bio-stub}} when {{US-handball-bio-stub}} already exists and you haven't gone through the appropriate WP:WSS/P process? Stub templates are subject to consensus. There's a project where they're proposed and consensus is gathered to create them. There's no need to create duplicate new templates. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 07:44, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi BU Rob13, thank you for your message. Yes, I see. I wondered already why the United States didn't have this bio stub. I searched for UnitedStates-handball-bio-stub, United States-handball-bio-stub and USA-handball-bio-stub, but not for US. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 21:57, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Peter Randt has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Peter Randt. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 23:51, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Women in sports: a barnstar to honor your diligence

Barnstar of Diligence

Hi Sander, I want to continue to lend a voice of support for the important work you are doing creating articles about women in sport. As long as an article meets standards, it has a place in Wikipedia and I'm grateful for your efforts to create it, no matter the size of the article. All of these women are from some city somewhere in the world, and there are girls in those cities looking up to the hometown hero. Some day, someone will come along and will expand those stubs. I don't care if it that's 5 years, 15 years, or 50 years from now, the wiki thumbprint helps assure that the person doesn't get omitted from the history books. I've written a lot of women's bios after finding the woman in old PD sources, and each time, I think, "Good... I found her! If I don't write this article now, then when? If I don't do it, then who will?" Thank you for what you do, and know that I appreciate your efforts. Rosiestep (talk) 19:06, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

William Owen

Hi, the article for William Owen (footballer, born 1862) has 1862 as the year of birth in the title but states 1860 in the actual article. As the creator of the article, can you shed any light on which is the correct date? Kosack (talk) 19:22, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

The reference given in the article doesn't help. There are two William Owens listed at that website, and this article appears to conflate both of them together.

• William Owen
• William Pierce Owen

@Sander.v.Ginkel:, please explain. Bradv 19:33, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

I see the name is not correct, the other person is William Pierce Owen. I saw the red link at List of Wales international footballers (alphabetical) and started creating the article. I however didn't notice the red link had a typo in it. Will change it! Thanks, Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 21:57, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

When Changning I see I mixed them indeed. There not 2 but even 3(!) As I don't have time now and only a crappy phone I will fix it tomorrow on the Wiki pages having a proper computer. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 22:28, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Eugen Mühlberger

You claim that Eugen Mühlberger died in August 1943 without any evidence. What makes you give this date, instead of the date given in the source? Please explain! The Banner talk 19:57, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

That was a typo.. Thanks For noticing. As I see you're screening drafts, it would have been appriciated if you moved screened drafts to the main space. Why not doing that, and leaving the job to someone else? Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 21:51, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, and now the other mistakes. Please, be more accurate and give more sources. The Banner talk 22:07, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

More drafts to fix:

1. Draft:Willem Tholen - incorrect age
2. Draft:Joop Zalm - same
3. Draft:Martin Rubin - incomplete, no player just plays in the Olympics
4. Draft:Claudia Sturm - same
5. Draft:Max Schär - same
6. Draft:Cecilio Alonso - same
7. and many, many more

With the first two there is nothing wrong with the age. They are all listed with the help of Template:death date and age, and they are all correct. I see also still the age is listed as how old they should be by now. That information is not needed in the articles and I removed it. For the other things, these people only meet WP:NSPORTS because they competed at the Olympics. Almost all of the former Olympians who are created, are created in this way. To create such an article 1 reliable source is enough the start the article with. I tagged the articles as a stub, a definition of a stub is: A stub is an article that, although providing some useful information, is too short to provide encyclopedic coverage of a subject, and that is capable of expansion. But I you find some usefull information about the players with a reference, I invite you to add it to the article. I can explain you also how you could move a draft to the main space after you've screened some. This would be constructive for Wikipedia, and also not someone else has to do the same job as you did again. Or is it that you're only screening my draft looking for some errors to complain about me? Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 09:00, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Stop whining, Sander, but upgrade the quality of your work. Your attitude shows that you have prefer production over quality. And those mistakes in the ages could have prevented by simple reading the article before saving. The Banner talk 10:29, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

I guess the "incomplete" is about the number of appearances for the national team, where you only list the olympic appearances. While this is noted in the infobox, I do think it is a rather poor way of handling this. For e.g. Max Schär, you could have used [21] which lists his olympic results and his statistics with the national team and in competition. Before starting a batch of articles, it would often be better if you looked for better sources, so that at least the basic information is reasonably complete. Now you way too often focus on one (important but small) aspect of a career to build your articles on. Fram (talk) 09:55, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Please compare: your edit[22], my edit[23]. When you edit these articles, please check that the basics (like year of birth) are the same as in the source. While these dates have little real importance for long-dead people, they are of major importance for sporters, and may have real-life implications. Fram (talk) 10:19, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

When you are changing links, e.g. at Ursula Lohn, who do you keep the less useful team link instead of using the individual player link? [24] Has all the info of the link you use, plus some more. Of course, a link that actually referenced the line it is following ("On club level she plays for TuS Ahrbach in Germany") would be even better. Fram (talk) 10:50, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

A link like [25] would be really useful for the reader, and for the next editor willing to expand such a stub. Fram (talk) 10:52, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Your Drafts

I would accept your Drafts but they need better sources than the sole SportsReference. SwisterTwister talk 19:47, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

@SwisterTwister: Thank you for your willingness to review my pages. As the Olympic sportspeople meet WP:NOLYMPICS, so one reference such as sports-reference is enough to get published. Sports-reference is very reliable so a better source is not needed. This is done for about all Olympic articles of (former) Olympians that are created. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 20:01, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Max Schär has been accepted

Max Schär, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 20:12, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Willem Tholen has been accepted

Willem Tholen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 20:15, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zoran Lubej has been accepted

Zoran Lubej, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 20:23, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sven Lakenmacher has been accepted

Sven Lakenmacher, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 20:23, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rudolf Schilberg has been accepted

Rudolf Schilberg, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 20:24, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jakob Vogt has been accepted

Jakob Vogt, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 20:27, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Slim Zehani has been accepted

Slim Zehani, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 20:28, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nathalie Selambarom has been accepted

Nathalie Selambarom, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 20:29, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cor Tabak has been accepted

Cor Tabak, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 20:30, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Josef Zeman (weighlifter) has been accepted

Josef Zeman (weighlifter), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 20:32, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karl Bierwirth has been accepted

Karl Bierwirth, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 22:12, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Goran Đukanović has been accepted

Goran Đukanović, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 22:18, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi

I did some uploading, may be you like it [26] :) --Nicola (talk) 15:27, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

@Nicola: WoW, nice! Will take a better look at them when I have more time :). Thanks for letting me know. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 19:54, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Take your time :) First result [27]. --Nicola (talk) 20:03, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

May be you have an opinion about this: [28] :) --Nicola (talk) 11:45, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Eugen Mühlberger for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eugen Mühlberger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eugen Mühlberger until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 13:32, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joop Zalm has been accepted

Joop Zalm, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 20:14, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

How on earth could this dodgy article be accepted? It still contains mistakes made by SvG, and that he could have seen by simply reading the article. The Banner talk 13:30, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

The only thing you can is complaining. You don't even fix the most simple things. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 15:52, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eugen Mühlberger has been accepted

Eugen Mühlberger, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 20:16, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

I am disgusted that this dodgy, unreliable article was accepted and have nominated it for deletion. The Banner talk 13:34, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

The only thing you can is complaining. You don't even fix the most simple things. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 15:52, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Steffi Subke has been accepted

Steffi Subke, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 20:22, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

User:SwisterTwister, you need to do a bit more cleaning up before this article is half decent... The Banner talk 13:35, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

And of course the only thing you do is complaining. Are you really searching for errors only to complain!?!? Everybody makes mistakes. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 15:57, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jani Likaveč has been accepted

Jani Likaveč, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 20:24, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

User:SwisterTwister, you need to do a bit more cleaning up before this article is half decent... The Banner talk 13:39, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

If you would do reviewing yourself you would understand these errors. But as usual, the only thing you do is complaining. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 16:00, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tanja Logwin has been accepted

Tanja Logwin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 20:25, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

User:SwisterTwister, you need to do a bit more cleaning up before this article is half decent... The Banner talk 13:40, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Do you really think it's helpfull to complain within minutes about the same thing? Thanks for fixing it yourself... Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 16:03, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Template cycling squads

May I suggest that you start merging all outdated cycling squad templates with the relevant year articles, like List of 2010 UCI Women's Teams and riders for women squads out of 2010? The Banner talk 19:24, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

The templates are not outdated. The templates must not only be at the 2010 list article but also on the 2010 season page and/or the team page. Because of that I prefer keeping them as a template. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 19:56, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

You have seen what happened with other, similar templates... The Banner talk 09:08, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

I didn't support it, but if you want to have it done, be my guest. I supported you several times to nominate them all. Why didn't you do that? Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 15:35, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Because I am a nice guy and hope you are willing to clean up your own mess. The Banner talk 14:30, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

I'm always willing to clean up my own mess, but (in my opinion) it's not a mess, so I don't see the urgency to do it. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 14:53, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:2016OlympicCyclingSchedule

Template:2016OlympicCyclingSchedule has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:14, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Festive greetings!

A barnstar of deep recognition for all your efforts on Women in Red throughout the year. Enjoy the end of year festivities and prepare to put more women on the world map in 2017. --Ipigott (talk) 09:03, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

AN/i

You did a lot of damage to yourself with your "Proposal 4". I am hesitant about voting about the community ban, but seeing the way you act I must admit that I do not oppose it. You have made a spectacular mess of it and you have blown up your own credibility. It will take quite some time to restore that. Your battleground mentality, finger pointing, WP:IDHT, revenge proposals, following around, lack of quality is now coming back to you as a boomerang.

I will give you one last chance by voting for proposal 2 so you get a chance to show the community that your attitude can change and that the quality of your work can improve. But lie low and do not push your luck. The Banner talk 11:40, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

It was a bit childish, but his frustration is understandable. Fram isn't perfect, I think that was Sander's point. Going to ANI in the first place, expecting sympathy was one of the gravest mistakes to make though as the atmosphere tends to be hostile to content producers and WP:BOOMERANG usually results.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:46, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Closing

There's been a closing of the discussion on AN/I by Avi. The three parts of the close are this:

• 1. For a period of six (6) months, Sander is restricted to creating no more tha[n] two (2) articles on living people per day. These articles must be created in user space, and must be approved by either an administrator or a New Page Reviewer before being moved into main article space. The limitation on two articles also includes making material edits to existing articles on living people. Barring further violations, this restriction will lapse after six months.

• 2. [S]hould Sander be shown to violate the editing restrictions, any uninvolved administrator may block Sander for as long as they feel necessary to protect the project, up to and including indefinitely. This extends beyond the six (6) month restriction unless lifted by community discussion and consensus.

• 3. [A] list of Sander's existing problematic BLP articles should be made for reference for interested parties to recreate properly. Once created, one (1) week's notice should be given in a public enough manner so that editors and interested Wikiprojects (Cycling and Olympics were mentioned by name) can "adopt" articles to either correct during that week or userfy for longer-term correction. After said week, corrected articles should be removed from the list and the remaining uncorrected BLP articles should be deleted.

You can read the entire text of the close, which includes caveats, at the discussion. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:18, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

@Beyond My Ken: Thank you for noticing me. Does the first part mean I can't add info to no more than 2 (new or existing) BLP articles per day? Does material edits also include adding (medal) templates? Does this also mean I can't edit more than 2 articles I already created? Regarding to point 3, when will this week start? Is help from me appriciated in this matter? Thanks, Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 18:22, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi: You should address those questions to the closing admin at User talk:Avraham. Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:26, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, will do so :) Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 18:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Template:Bryan

It is quite disappointing how you react of your boomerang. Let me make it clear: what you did on Template:Bryan was close to vandalism. If you had properly read the template, you could have seen that you were supposed to add the page number when using it.

Stop doing such crap, or you will be back at AN/I soon. The Banner talk 22:07, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Some advice

Hi, Sander. You probably don't know me that well, but I'm an editor in the sports field who has been following your case at ANI. As you know, the case has closed with some restrictions on you in terms of working on BLPs. I understand that this is likely difficult for you, as you are apparently used to working at a high rate of speed, but I admit to being concerned when I see that your first batch of edits after the ANI includes a series of tags added to articles that Fram has worked on. While you may have negative feelings towards them over the ANI, many of the users supporting a block were concerned by your attitude in proposing speedy deletion of all articles that user created. I can't read their minds, but I think they felt that you were trying to deflect attention from issues in your work, even if that wasn't the intention. There is probably going to be a segment of the community that will be keeping close tabs on your work in the near-future, and you need to show them that you are capable of changing and being more careful in your editing. Any edits that can be seen as going after Fram's articles just make it appear that you are trying to retaliate against them for criticizing you, which isn't the look you should be aiming for right now.

What you need to do is take that critical eye and use it in judging your own work. When reviewing articles by others, I often find it much easier to spot problems in their work than in mine, so I understand that this is hard, but it is doable. When editing, take a second before you save to check out what you are doing. Don't blindly trust websites like Wikidata or other Wikipedias, as they are only as good as the users who work there; we can all make mistakes, and any errors there can easily be replicated here if you're not careful. Be especially cautious with sensitive BLP info, such as any allegations or birth date controversies; you might want to avoid those topics for now, as several of us brought that up as a concern. My recommendation is to use your two BLP edits per day fixing issues in your previous work. I believe you mentioned that you were making a list of problematic BLP articles. That is a perfect place to start. If you do some work fixing your previously created articles, that would go a long way towards showing the community that you understand its concerns and want to better yourself and your work. Anyway, this is only my advice and you can take it or leave it. I feel like you've been given a second chance here, and I don't want you to waste it worrying about others' work. Focus on improving your own editing and things will take care of themselves. While I'm here, have a happy holidays. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:42, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

I echo User:Giants2008 comments. You're on very thin ice, Sander. I wouldn't be surprised if a non-involved admin decides that your actions after the close indicate you cannot edit cordially with others. For your own sake, disassociate from anything to do with Fram. Fram is not your problem. Your own negligence and carelessness got you into this mess, it will take an exhibit of care and concern to get you out of it, -- Avi (talk) 22:41, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Belarus at the 2016 World Speed Skating Championships for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Belarus at the 2016 World Speed Skating Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belarus at the 2016 World Speed Skating Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:37, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Argentina at the 2015 UCI Track Cycling World Championships for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Argentina at the 2015 UCI Track Cycling World Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argentina at the 2015 UCI Track Cycling World Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:44, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Algeria at the 2015 UCI Road World Championships for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Algeria at the 2015 UCI Road World Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Algeria at the 2015 UCI Road World Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:52, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Netherlands at the 2014 European Road Championships

The article Netherlands at the 2014 European Road Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nations at the xxx pages are usually reserved for events with multiple sports or disciplines. This one focuses on just one sport. Also quoting Peter Rehse, from another similar AFD [29], "they are all a rehash of a single source. National results for events that are borderline notable themselves. Even there there is nothing demonstrating that [the country] performed anywhere near notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:12, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of France at the 2013 European Road Championships

The article France at the 2013 European Road Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nations at the xxx pages are usually reserved for events with multiple sports or disciplines. This one focuses on just one sport. Also quoting Peter Rehse, from another similar AFD [30], "they are all a rehash of a single source. National results for events that are borderline notable themselves. Even there there is nothing demonstrating that [the country] performed anywhere near notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:13, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Netherlands at the 2013 European Road Championships

The article Netherlands at the 2013 European Road Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nations at the xxx pages are usually reserved for events with multiple sports or disciplines. This one focuses on just one sport. Also quoting Peter Rehse, from another similar AFD [31], "they are all a rehash of a single source. National results for events that are borderline notable themselves. Even there there is nothing demonstrating that [the country] performed anywhere near notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:13, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Netherlands at the 2013 UEC European Track Championships

The article Netherlands at the 2013 UEC European Track Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nations at the xxx pages are usually reserved for events with multiple sports or disciplines. This one focuses on just one sport. Also quoting Peter Rehse, from another similar AFD [32], "they are all a rehash of a single source. National results for events that are borderline notable themselves. Even there there is nothing demonstrating that [the country] performed anywhere near notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:14, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ukraine at the 2013 European Road Championships

The article Ukraine at the 2013 European Road Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nations at the xxx pages are usually reserved for events with multiple sports or disciplines. This one focuses on just one sport. Also quoting Peter Rehse, from another similar AFD [33], "they are all a rehash of a single source. National results for events that are borderline notable themselves. Even there there is nothing demonstrating that [the country] performed anywhere near notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:14, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Netherlands at the 2011 UEC European Track Championships

The article Netherlands at the 2011 UEC European Track Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nations at the xxx pages are usually reserved for events with multiple sports or disciplines. This one focuses on just one sport. Also quoting Peter Rehse, from another similar AFD [34], "they are all a rehash of a single source. National results for events that are borderline notable themselves. Even there there is nothing demonstrating that [the country] performed anywhere near notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:14, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Netherlands at the 2012 UEC European Track Championships

The article Netherlands at the 2012 UEC European Track Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nations at the xxx pages are usually reserved for events with multiple sports or disciplines. This one focuses on just one sport. Also quoting Peter Rehse, from another similar AFD [35], "they are all a rehash of a single source. National results for events that are borderline notable themselves. Even there there is nothing demonstrating that [the country] performed anywhere near notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Netherlands at the 2009 European Road Championships

The article Netherlands at the 2009 European Road Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nations at the xxx pages are usually reserved for events with multiple sports or disciplines. This one focuses on just one sport. Also quoting Peter Rehse, from another similar AFD [36], "they are all a rehash of a single source. National results for events that are borderline notable themselves. Even there there is nothing demonstrating that [the country] performed anywhere near notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sweden at the 2009 European Road Championships

The article Sweden at the 2009 European Road Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nations at the xxx pages are usually reserved for events with multiple sports or disciplines. This one focuses on just one sport. Also quoting Peter Rehse, from another similar AFD [37], "they are all a rehash of a single source. National results for events that are borderline notable themselves. Even there there is nothing demonstrating that [the country] performed anywhere near notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Netherlands at the 2010 UEC European Track Championships

The article Netherlands at the 2010 UEC European Track Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nations at the xxx pages are usually reserved for events with multiple sports or disciplines. This one focuses on just one sport. Also quoting Peter Rehse, from another similar AFD [38], "they are all a rehash of a single source. National results for events that are borderline notable themselves. Even there there is nothing demonstrating that [the country] performed anywhere near notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Netherlands at the 2008 European Road Championships

The article Netherlands at the 2008 European Road Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nations at the xxx pages are usually reserved for events with multiple sports or disciplines. This one focuses on just one sport. Also quoting Peter Rehse, from another similar AFD [39], "they are all a rehash of a single source. National results for events that are borderline notable themselves. Even there there is nothing demonstrating that [the country] performed anywhere near notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:16, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ukraine at the 2008 European Road Championships

The article Ukraine at the 2008 European Road Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nations at the xxx pages are usually reserved for events with multiple sports or disciplines. This one focuses on just one sport. Also quoting Peter Rehse, from another similar AFD [40], "they are all a rehash of a single source. National results for events that are borderline notable themselves. Even there there is nothing demonstrating that [the country] performed anywhere near notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:16, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Netherlands at the 2008 UEC European Track Championships

The article Netherlands at the 2008 UEC European Track Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nations at the xxx pages are usually reserved for events with multiple sports or disciplines. This one focuses on just one sport. Also quoting Peter Rehse, from another similar AFD [41], "they are all a rehash of a single source. National results for events that are borderline notable themselves. Even there there is nothing demonstrating that [the country] performed anywhere near notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:16, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Belarus at the 2008 UEC European Track Championships

The article Belarus at the 2008 UEC European Track Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nations at the xxx pages are usually reserved for events with multiple sports or disciplines. This one focuses on just one sport. Also quoting Peter Rehse, from another similar AFD [42], "they are all a rehash of a single source. National results for events that are borderline notable themselves. Even there there is nothing demonstrating that [the country] performed anywhere near notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Great Britain at the 2008 UEC European Track Championships

The article Great Britain at the 2008 UEC European Track Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nations at the xxx pages are usually reserved for events with multiple sports or disciplines. This one focuses on just one sport. Also quoting Peter Rehse, from another similar AFD [43], "they are all a rehash of a single source. National results for events that are borderline notable themselves. Even there there is nothing demonstrating that [the country] performed anywhere near notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lithuania at the 2008 UEC European Track Championships

The article Lithuania at the 2008 UEC European Track Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nations at the xxx pages are usually reserved for events with multiple sports or disciplines. This one focuses on just one sport. Also quoting Peter Rehse, from another similar AFD [44], "they are all a rehash of a single source. National results for events that are borderline notable themselves. Even there there is nothing demonstrating that [the country] performed anywhere near notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Netherlands at the 2006 European Road Championships

The article Netherlands at the 2006 European Road Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nations at the xxx pages are usually reserved for events with multiple sports or disciplines. This one focuses on just one sport. Also quoting Peter Rehse, from another similar AFD [45], "they are all a rehash of a single source. National results for events that are borderline notable themselves. Even there there is nothing demonstrating that [the country] performed anywhere near notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Netherlands at the 2007 European Road Championships

The article Netherlands at the 2007 European Road Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nations at the xxx pages are usually reserved for events with multiple sports or disciplines. This one focuses on just one sport. Also quoting Peter Rehse, from another similar AFD [46], "they are all a rehash of a single source. National results for events that are borderline notable themselves. Even there there is nothing demonstrating that [the country] performed anywhere near notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:AGG2010riders

Template:AGG2010riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:47, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:HPU2010riders

Template:HPU2010riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:ARC2010riders

Template:ARC2010riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:LNL2010riders

Template:LNL2010riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:CWT2010riders

Template:CWT2010riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:SAF2010riders

Template:SAF2010riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:VAI2010riders

Template:VAI2010riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:TOG2010riders

Template:TOG2010riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:KSK2010riders

Template:KSK2010riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:MIC2010riders

Template:MIC2010riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:GAU2010riders

Template:GAU2010riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:USC2010riders

Template:USC2010riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:FUT2010riders

Template:FUT2010riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:ESG2010riders

Template:ESG2010riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:LTK2010riders

Template:LTK2010riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:52, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:DKT2010riders

Template:DKT2010riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:52, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:BPD2010riders

Template:BPD2010riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:52, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:VLL2010riders

Template:VLL2010riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:53, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:LLT2010riders

Template:LLT2010riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:53, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:TIB2011riders

Template:TIB2011riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:55, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:DPZ2011riders

Template:DPZ2011riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:HPU2011riders

Template:HPU2011riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:NLB2011riders

Template:NLB2011riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:VAI2011riders

Template:VAI2011riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:TOG2011riders

Template:TOG2011riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:MCG2011riders

Template:MCG2011riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:MIC2011riders

Template:MIC2011riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:FUT2011riders

Template:FUT2011riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:GSD2011riders

Template:GSD2011riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:LTK2011riders

Template:LTK2011riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:VLL2011riders

Template:VLL2011riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:VAI2012riders

Template:VAI2012riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:VLL2012riders

Template:VLL2012riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:MIC2012riders

Template:MIC2012riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:MCG2012riders

Template:MCG2012riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:HPU2012riders

Template:HPU2012riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 03:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:TOG2012riders

Template:TOG2012riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:00, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:DPZ2012riders

Template:DPZ2012riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:00, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:TOG2013riders

Template:TOG2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:SEF2013riders

Template:SEF2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:MIC2013riders

Template:MIC2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:MCG2013riders

Template:MCG2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:LBL2013riders

Template:LBL2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:LKT2013riders

Template:LKT2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:RVL2013riders

Template:RVL2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:BPD2013riders

Template:BPD2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:FUT2013riders

Template:FUT2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:VAI2013riders

Template:VAI2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:VLL2013riders

Template:VLL2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:04, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:VAI2014riders

Template:VAI2014riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:VLL2014riders

Template:VLL2014riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:SEF2014riders

Template:SEF2014riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:LBL2014riders

Template:LBL2014riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:LKT2014riders

Template:LKT2014riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:FTZ2014riders

Template:FTZ2014riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:FDA2014riders

Template:FDA2014riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:BTC2014riders

Template:BTC2014riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:BPD2014riders

Template:BPD2014riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:BCT2014riders

Template:BCT2014riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:TSC2006riders

Template:TSC2006riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:NMC2006riders

Template:NMC2006riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:ALI2006riders

Template:ALI2006riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:HCT2006riders

Template:HCT2006riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:18, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:UPT2006riders

Template:UPT2006riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:18, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:RAC2007riders

Template:RAC2007riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:19, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:ECC2007riders

Template:ECC2007riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:19, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:CVA2007riders

Template:CVA2007riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:19, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:SEM2007riders

Template:SEM2007riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:19, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:TSC2007riders

Template:TSC2007riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:19, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:CRW2007riders

Template:CRW2007riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:20, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:COL2007riders

Template:COL2007riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:20, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:TGH2007riders

Template:TGH2007riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:20, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:FRW2007riders

Template:FRW2007riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 04:21, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WEB2008riders

Template:WEB2008riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 10:55, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:VBR2008riders

Template:VBR2008riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 10:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:TLG2008riders

Template:TLG2008riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 10:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:PRI2008riders

Template:PRI2008riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 10:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:PAQ2008riders

Template:PAQ2008riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 10:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:EHN2008riders

Template:EHN2008riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 10:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:TFA2008riders

Template:TFA2008riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 10:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:FLX2009riders

Template:FLX2009riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 10:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:PTG2009riders

Template:PTG2009riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 10:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:DGC2009riders

Template:DGC2009riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 10:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:BCT2009riders

Template:BCT2009riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 10:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:MSI2009riders

Template:MSI2009riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 10:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:VAD2010riders

Template:VAD2010riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 11:00, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:RSC2010riders

Template:RSC2010riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 11:00, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:MTW2010riders

Template:MTW2010riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 11:00, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:FEN2010riders

Template:FEN2010riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 11:01, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:FLF2013riders

Template:FLF2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 11:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:FCL2013riders

Template:FCL2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 11:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:TPW2013riders

Template:TPW2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 11:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:AGG2013riders

Template:AGG2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 11:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:GKS2013riders

Template:GKS2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 11:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:EXG2013riders

Template:EXG2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 11:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:SLT2013riders

Template:SLT2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 11:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:CZT2013riders

Template:CZT2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 11:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:BCF2013riders

Template:BCF2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 11:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:EMF2014riders

Template:EMF2014riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 11:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:RVL2014riders

Template:RVL2014riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 11:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 11:30, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

I've just gone through the latest batch of edits that have resulted in complaints, and I've seen enough. You need to take a break from editing while everyone assesses the situation, and it doesn't appear you can do that voluntarily. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 11:30, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

@The Banner: Can you please explain why you reverted my edits like this one and this one? Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 15:35, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Because they looked very much like revenge templating, trying to hurt Fram instead of improving the article. Secondly, while you are blocked, you are only allowed to discuss your block and nothing else. The Banner talk 18:00, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Sander, this is the last time I am going to say this. You are one step away from having your editing privileges indefinitely revoked for inability to collaborate with others. You have been a lazy and careless editor causing an enormous amount of work for others to clean up. You are fortunate that most wikipedians are decent folk and that Wikipedia as a project is not interested in punishment but growth. However, when someone exhibits behavior which indicates that collaborative editing will not occur, the project suffers, no matter how prolific a content creator that person may be. Your content creation itself, for that matter, has been of more harm than good. Take this break week to seriously consider whether or not you are an editor whose skills and talents are best suited for the Wikipedia collaborative model. There is no shame in realizing one's talents lie in different areas, we all have unique personalities whose expressions differ. But realize that continuing the behavior you have exhibited this week, let alone over the past, will result in the project taking measures to protect itself which will almost certainly be the indefinite removal of your editing privileges. Happy Holidays and good luck. -- Avi (talk) 16:11, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:FUT2014riders

Template:FUT2014riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 11:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

@The Banner: Like I've told you several times before, it would have been way better to have made one TfD and listing the different templates in stead of 100 different ones. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 15:37, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

They have by now been merged at TfD. But please not that you are not allowed to ask about that... The Banner talk 18:04, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Request for reviewing my block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sander.v.Ginkel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

1) I am not allowed to make >2 edits per day on a BLP articles, but the pages I edited where not on BLP articles.
2) I was blocked for making about 10 edits like this one. While I had a dispute with user Fram (the creator of the articles) I don't see why those edits are wrong and against guideliness. In my opinion the block was made out of sentiment and not following the rules that have been made. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 20:26, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

What The Banner said: Seems like you have been tagging articles substantially edited by Fram in a way that suggests you were engaging in revenge tagging. If these edits were done in good faith one would expect at least several articles - if not most - to not be edited by her (?). It's also not the first time you have retaliated against Fram. Wikipedia is not interested in vendettas and disguising them as good edits doesn't fly. It's probably best if you step away from her and her contributions at all for a while. I also think it's ill advised to ignore the comments on one's own talk page that were posted immediately before you made the appeal. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Merry Christmas and happy holidays!

Hello Sander. Wikipedia at times can be a particularly gruelling, hostile place. It's easy to get frustrated and before you know it you're blocked. As nobody else has thought of you here's some festive cheer, which I hope will mean something to you. I know you mean well and wanted to help wikipedia with your stubs, which few others seem to acknowledge. I hope there's a way you can learn from this and produce content of greater quality in the future.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:09, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Nomination for deletion of outdated template with cycling squads

Nomination for deletion of Template:ISG2015riders Template:ISG2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:33, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:VLL2015riders Template:VLL2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:34, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:VEL2015riders Template:VEL2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:34, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:VAI2015riders Template:VAI2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:34, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:UHC2015riders Template:UHC2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:34, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:TRY2015riders Template:TRY2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:35, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:TOG2015riders Template:TOG2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:35, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:TIB2015riders Template:TIB2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:35, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:T162015riders Template:T162015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:35, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:SLP2015riders Template:SLP2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:36, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:SEF2015riders Template:SEF2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:36, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:RBW2015riders Template:RBW2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:36, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:PPC2015riders Template:PPC2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:36, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:OPW2015riders Template:OPW2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:36, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:OGE22015riders Template:OGE22015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:36, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:NOE2015riders Template:NOE2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:36, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:MIC2015riders Template:MIC2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:37, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:MAT2015riders Template:MAT2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:37, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:LWZ2015riders Template:LWZ2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:37, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:LTK2015riders Template:LTK2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:38, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:LBL2015riders Template:LBL2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:38, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:HPU2015riders Template:HPU2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:38, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:GPC2015riders Template:GPC2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:38, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:FUT2015riders Template:FUT2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:38, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:BZK2015riders Template:BZK2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:39, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:FCT2015riders Template:FCT2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:39, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:BTC2015riders Template:BTC2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:39, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:BPK2015riders Template:BPK2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:40, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:BPD2015riders Template:BPD2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:40, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:BMW2015riders Template:BMW2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:40, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:BCT2015riders Template:BCT2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:41, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:ASA2015riders Template:ASA2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:41, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:ALE2015riders Template:ALE2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:41, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:PHV2015riders Template:PHV2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:42, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:TLP2015riders Template:TLP2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:42, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:SQS2013riders Template:SQS2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:47, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:GEW2014riders Template:GEW2014riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:04, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:RBW2014riders Template:RBW2014riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:04, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:WHT2014riders Template:WHT2014riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:05, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:ALE2014riders Template:ALE2014riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:07, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:SLT2012riders Template:SLT2012riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:08, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:DSB2009riders Template:DSB2009riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:09, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:CWT2009riders Template:CWT2009riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:09, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:LBL2009riders Template:LBL2009riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:09, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:HBH2008riders Template:HBH2008riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:10, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:FLX2008riders Template:FLX2008riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:10, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:AAD2008riders Template:AAD2008riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:10, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:FLX2006riders Template:FLX2006riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:10, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:DLT2015riders Template:DLT2015riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:10, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:RBW2012riders Template:RBW2012riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:11, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:BPK2013riders Template:BPK2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:11, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:MIC2014riders Template:MIC2014riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:11, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:UHC2014riders Template:UHC2014riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:11, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:TOG2014riders Template:TOG2014riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:12, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:PHV2014riders Template:PHV2014riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:12, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:SLU2014riders Template:SLU2014riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:12, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:DLT2014riders Template:DLT2014riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:12, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:DLT2011riders Template:DLT2011riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:13, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:DLT2012riders Template:DLT2012riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:13, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:OPW2013riders Template:OPW2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:18, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:OPT2013riders Template:OPT2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:18, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:VVP2006riders Template:VVP2006riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:18, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:VVP2007riders Template:VVP2007riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:18, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:VVP2008riders Template:VVP2008riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:19, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:LIP2007riders Template:LIP2007riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:19, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:TSW2008riders Template:TSW2008riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:19, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:FLX2007riders Template:FLX2007riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:19, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:VOR2009riders Template:VOR2009riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:20, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:RSC2009riders Template:RSC2009riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:20, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:NUR2010riders Template:NUR2010riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:23, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:CWT2011riders Template:CWT2011riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:24, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:LBL2006riders Template:LBL2006riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:24, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:LBL2007riders Template:LBL2007riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:24, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:LBL2012riders Template:LBL2012riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:24, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:LNL2012riders Template:LNL2012riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:24, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:DPD2012riders Template:DPD2012riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:25, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:TMP2006riders Template:TMP2006riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:25, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:TMP2007riders Template:TMP2007riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:25, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:TMP2008riders Template:TMP2008riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:25, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:TCW2009riders Template:TCW2009riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:26, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:TCW2010riders Template:TCW2010riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:26, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:SLU2012riders Template:SLU2012riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:26, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:FCL2008riders Template:FCL2008riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:26, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:USC2009riders Template:USC2009riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:27, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:RBW2013riders Template:RBW2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:27, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:TIB2013riders Template:TIB2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:27, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:SLU2013riders Template:SLU2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:28, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:HPU2013riders Template:HPU2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:28, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:DLT2013riders Template:DLT2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:28, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:PZC2013riders Template:PZC2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:28, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:BPK2014riders Template:BPK2014riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:29, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:WHT2013riders Template:WHT2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:29, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:GEW2013riders Template:GEW2013riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:29, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alejandro Vega

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Alejandro Vega requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WWGB (talk) 01:45, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Ukraine at the 2013 European Road Championships for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ukraine at the 2013 European Road Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ukraine at the 2013 European Road Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:32, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Netherlands at the 2013 UEC European Track Championships for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Netherlands at the 2013 UEC European Track Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Netherlands at the 2013 UEC European Track Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:35, 27 December 2016 (UTC)