User talk:Sakura Cartelet/Archives/Archive 1

Re:Truffle finding pigs

Sorry, this was a prank by my friends whilst I wasnt at the computer, hope it didnt cause too many hassles. Andy4226uk (talk) 00:20, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AFC Backlog Drive

WikiProject Articles for creation needs your help!

WikiProject Articles for creation has done a tremendous job in working at WP:AFC over the past 7½ months. Thank you all for your hard work and dedication! Together, we've made the submission process easier and more streamlined, developed tools to make the process go faster for reviewers, and cut the backlog down to a mere fraction of what it once was. Well done!

As you all are aware, however, our work is not quite yet done. The project still has 10 archive pages left to complete, which include over half a month's worth of submissions, many of which have not been completely reviewed. We need your help to finish looking over these neglected submissions so that we can finally remove the backlog notice from the page, and put an end to the more than two year old backlog that has been a thorn in our side for ages! Participants will receive an AFC Barnstar, so hurry up and help out while there's still work to be done! Make sure to sign in on the WikiProject's talk page so we know who is involved in what promises to be our final effort to complete this goal. Thank you for all your help!
- Happy editing as always, Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 16:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this letter because you are listed as a participant in the Articles for creation WikiProject at WP:WPAFC. To avoid receiving further notices, please remove your name from the list. Thanks!

WP:UAA

Hello Nano, I see you just removed a username from UAA. Well let me tell you, you certainly don't need to be an admin to do that, and we really appreciate the help so thanks a bunch :-) Ryan Postlethwaite 00:34, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. :) Burner0718 ^JibbaJabba! 23:32, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Speedy deletion of Devourment band members

Hey, no problem. A lot of people seem to hate me at the moment, and have decided that vandalising that article is the best way to tell me. I've semi-protected it for a week. J Milburn (talk) 08:35, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback request granted

For the public record, the request for this alternative to be flagged with rollback has been granted. As a reminder to the account holder, abuse of rollback (that is, usage of the tool outwith the boundaries of vandalism reversion) may result in all of your accounts being deflagged, and certainly this one. Use wisely! AGK (contact) 00:34, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Wow, I was just running through Anon ip's and I saw that you warned someone for vandalising my user page. Double yew tea eff I thought, no one has vandalised my user page, this madness, "I would know if someone vandalised my user page" I muttered in disbelief, but alas this is wikipedia!, where vandals vandalise user pages and people like you revert them real fast. As some sort of reward, I award you with an extremely exclusive, cookie. Its yours to keep :P--Kerotan ^{Leave Me a Message} Have a nice day :) 02:09, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

my RfA thanks

Oh snap, the DEA is an admin

I would like to thank you for your participation in my recent RfA, which I'm very glad to say was successful at 81/7/0. Some of the very best that Wikipedia has to offer came out to support or oppose me and the kind words from all the editors has really given me confidence to be an admin and I can't wait to start. I will take the advice of the opposes and not jump into any content disputes immediately. As well, I will try to add more content myself. Anyways, in thanks for participating in my RfA, I got you something great but I can't show you because it's fair-use only. Excuse me, I mean non-free. Enjoy! --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 14:11, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

I just rolledback one of your changes, where you accidently changed "software" to "sofware". I used rollback because I thought you had introduced the mistake to other articles aswell, so a fast tool was the handiest. It seems that's not the case, and using rollback gives the wrong impression here. Sorry for the inconvenience. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 22:57, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And it seems I introduced an error in doing that. I fixed it though. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 23:00, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sailor Uranus links

Hi! Thanks for taking the time to make these links accurate. Don't worry about it too much, though, because making all of them would be a lot of work, and there's a specific guideline that says it's not really necessary to bypass the redirects. You can read about that at WP:REDIRECT#NOTBROKEN.

Anyway, thanks again for your contributions, and I'll see you around! --Masamage ♫ 00:24, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hey, thanks for catching the vandalism on my User page, eh? :-)--RAult (talk) 22:12, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Your Message

Thank you for the reprimand. I actually vandalized the page becuase my previous vandalism of the Iowa class battleship article wasn't reverted within five minutes. I assumed that by vandalising a more visable article someone would notice the original vandalism and revert that too. Question: why haven't the bots caught this? They usually pick up on blatent vandalism alot faster. Have they gone down? 129.108.96.45 (talk) 02:25, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hey

um.. hi, is 20bite here. i got your message and i would like to know how to merge articles. ty. 20bite.

greetings

Hello there old fellow....thank you for welcoming me in wikipedia...That's all!!!!Have a good summer....Antony1821

Olof K. Gustafsson

Are you able to protect the page from unknown IP's to be unable to edit? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krimlopio (talk • contribs) 05:49, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AFC/R

Just a reminder, please take more time to look at redirect requests. I overturned your declining of Monday Night Football on ABC that was clearly plausible search term. Thanks for your help on WP:AFC/R and happy new year! KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 01:42, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why would someone enter Monday Night Football on ABC, when looking for this when they can simply enter Monday Night Football. We do not have (or need) redirects like Naruto on Cartoon Network as a redirect to Naruto. Nothing that I read in Wikipedia's guidelines for redirects (seems) to support your creation of these redirects. Sakuura Cartelet ^Talk 02:51, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AFC Backlog Drive

I deleted because he created an inexistent episode, what Pooh has to do with Doc McStuffins? Also I am not the one who made that up! (94.24.25.99 (talk) 08:05, 9 January 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Biathlon and Alpine skiing

Don't revert edits in sports about which you don't know anything! [1] 178.94.167.93 (talk) 15:16, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review - newsletter No.2

Hello Sakura Cartelet/Archives,

A HUGE backlog

We now have 804 New Page Reviewers!
Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October.

The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to 70,000.

Second set of eyes

Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten.

Abuse

This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody, and

this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting in a community ban.
this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in a community ban.
This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.

Coordinator election

Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later.

Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AFC/R

Thanks for helping out at AFC/R. For replying to requests at WP:AFC/R, Enterprisey's AFCR Helper Script is a timesaver. Install it by adding the following to your common.js file or your skin script file: {{subst:js|User:Enterprisey/AFCRHS.js}}, save and bypass your browser cache. This script handles both redirect and category requests, and categorizes the former. — Sam Sailor 02:59, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections

Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for spotting a talk-page vandal

Thanks --Northernhenge (talk) 23:27, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NOINDEX

I saw on your user page that you oppose no index on user pages. You can add __index__ (capital letters) to the very top of your user page (like I did for myself) to have your userpage be indexed. Cheers. Ethanbas ^(talk) 03:37, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review - newsletter No.3

Hello Sakura Cartelet/Archives,

Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed.

Still a MASSIVE backlog

We now have 804 New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced.
If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire.

Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Touhou character page

I explained like you wanted me to in the talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dangronples (talk • contribs) 22:47, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Response to Picture

I appreciate your concerns on the errors I made for my page and I quickly removed the picture. However, I was in the middle of editing my page and was checking back and forth to try to see if everything was aliened correctly having plans to double check and make sure a suitable, edited, sourced non copy righted pictured is being uploaded. If I choose to upload a picture I will make sure it meets Wikipedia's guidelines. Thanks, for your concerns ... ---WeLcOmEtOtHenEwMiLlEnIuM _(Talk) 10:40, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

I messed up the submission of my SSP report and accidently used User:Lewisstarks as the sockmaster when I meant User:Dereks1x as it. Can an admin please fix this? Sakuura Cartelet ^Talk 16:49, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing it I've resubmitted using the right user name. Sakuura Cartelet ^Talk 17:03, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removing prod

The removal was an act of vandalism in this case due to persistent addition of an unreliable source. Therefore the normal rules of prodding don't apply. There is no controversy for this reason. Thanks for noticing - the IP appears to be a troublemaker and it intentionally rebooted to continue to vandalise. 101.182.34.93 (talk) 21:23, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also I can't nominate it for AfD. I'm an IP. 101.182.34.93 (talk) 21:31, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted edits

How come you undid your edits to the sandbox?[2] Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 21:34, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I used rollback before I checked the edit and realized that the particular edit that I used it on wasn't vandalism/disruptive so I restored their revision. I guess I could've left the revert intact. Sakuura Cartelet ^Talk 21:39, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like they got blocked so I ended up just cleaning the sandbox out again. Sakuura Cartelet ^Talk 21:43, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Leafa

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Leafa you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ISD -- ISD (talk) 20:01, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Sakura Cartelet. You have new messages at Talk:Leafa/GA1.
Message added 07:22, 15 April 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

You may also wish to review the article Re:Zero − Starting Life in Another World, if you have time. Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 07:22, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacktime34 (talk • contribs) 02:29, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Leafa

The article Leafa you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Leafa for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ISD -- ISD (talk) 08:22, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nodar Kumaritashvili.jpg

I disagree with the "{{Di-disputed fair use rationale}}" tag. The image was discussed in 2010 and resulted in "no consensus, leaning to keep". May you please remove the tag and then take it to FFD or leave the image as is? --George Ho (talk) 02:45, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I originally tagged removed the anons tag thinking that it was about a living person. After I noticed that it wasn't about it I just did a rollback to what the anon had originally tagged it with (even though I didn't know why it was tagged). If you don't think it should be tagged for deletion just remove the deletion tag. Sakuura Cartelet ^Talk 03:13, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removed tag. --George Ho (talk) 03:20, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Make my changes permanent on waqar zaka page

Hello,

I am a famous TV host from Pakistan, " Waqar Zaka " , tried millions of time to correct wikipediapage on my name, specially Date of birthday but I don't know made that page , all info is incorrect and people usually search for me and its causing big social torture for me, please correct that info or remove that page so I can make a new one ,

Passport copy attached and my information and link to verified accounts is at my website

www.waqarzaka.net

You cannot allow random people to put incorrect information about celebrities , I understand its open to edit but if I am claiming and showing that I am the real person facing issues because your platform so you should correct it instead of saying that I should contact the person who made that page.

Please remove Waqar Zaka page or correct the info , which is from ABOUT section on my website.

regards, Waqar Zaka Karachi Pakistan www.waqarzaka.net

My changes didn't require any reference its written bhy real person for his Wikipedia So kindly make my changes permanent Zohaib922 (talk) 09:38, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'd put in a dead link tag

but I rather not be reverted twice in a short time. Okay, the article says something as significant as there was a stringed instrument even though there is no back-up, and unless I'm willing to spend an hour or two proving the statement, I might not be allowed to do anything with the error. You win.199.7.157.44 (talk) 06:02, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

same guy, different IP. I put the dead link tag in: revert at will.199.119.233.198 (talk) 16:00, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4

Hello Sakura Cartelet/Archives,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 804 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Your signature spells your username as "Sakuura Cartelet" (2 u's), but your username is "Sakura Cartelet" (1 u). Your signature might have a typo. —MRD2014 📞 contribs 01:32, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How did I miss that?! Well I fixed it now (hopefully anyway). Sakura Cartelet ^Talk 03:39, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Languages - Reply

Hi there SAKURA, from Portugal,

thanks for your message. Yes, i am full aware of that proceeding, having been here for almost 11 years (on and off with accounts, have had the intention of leaving forever several times only to find i cannot). However, i often communicate with this person, User:MYS77, in our native language of Portuguese, to facilitate matters.

However, should i be required to provide a translation of any contents found in his or my page, i'll be more than happy to oblige. Attentively, happy editing and sorry for any inconvenience --85.242.133.151 (talk) 22:50, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Sakura Cartelet/Archives, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.

Technology update:

Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Wikipedia:Page Curation/Suggested improvements
The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:
- User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js adds a link to the new pages feed and page curation toolbar to your top toolbar on Wikipedia
- User:The Earwig/copyvios.js adds a link in your side toolbox that will run the current page through

General project update:

Following discussion at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers, Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Noticeboard has been marked as historical. Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers is currently the most active central discussion forum for the New Page Patrol project. To keep up to date on the most recent discussions you can add it to your watchlist or visit it periodically.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regular Show

I'm not sure how much longer I can take dealing with that vandal vandalizing Regular Show related pages. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 02:18, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe try asking for protection of the pages involved (an possible revision delete of the edit summaries since a lot of them have personal attacks in them)? Sakura Cartelet ^Talk 02:21, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already waiting for a response on protection. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 02:25, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Sakura Cartelet/Archives, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.

Technology update:

Rentier has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.

General project update:

The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC) [reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Sakura Cartelet/Archives, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!

Technology update:

The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: T175225

General project update:

On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC) [reply]

IP is a sock of banned User:Stylized as "stylized" currently; formerly "stylizeD"

Good day. The edits in question atre being made by yet another sock of banned User:Stylized as "stylized" currently; formerly "stylizeD" Revert, block, ignore. Report has been made at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ASockpuppet_investigations%2FStylized_as_%22stylized%22_currently%3B_formerly_%22stylizeD%22&type=revision&diff=803996657&oldid=803968782

I'd not get involved with that individual were I you. Regards, Aloha27 talk 00:58, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Sakura Cartelet/Archives, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.

Technology update:

Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.

General project update:

The Article Wizard has been updated and simplified to match the layout style of the new user landing page. If you have not yet seen it, take a look.
To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

wiki is a scam — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.24.251.181 (talk) 22:33, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Thank you for fixing your signature to avoid generating lint errors! —Anomalocaris (talk) 21:13, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Experiences survey

Beginning on November 28, 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) will be conducting a survey to en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:

https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2017_AN/Incidents_Survey_Privacy_Statement

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.

Sign up here to receive a link to a survey

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:12, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sakura Cartelet. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:67.100.126.103

Why did you create User talk:67.100.126.103 for the talk page? I wasn't put inappropriate things on there for Wikipedia:Sandbox? —Preceding undated comment added 02:35, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

I did so because you tried to redirect the sandbox to the 2010s article which as pointed on the page that the template linked to wasn't supposed to be done as it could cause new users to think the page it was redirected to was a sandbox. Sakura Cartelet^Talk 02:39, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Sakura Cartelet/Archives, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!

Outreach and Invitations:

If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: {{subst:NPR invite}}. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.

New Year New Page Review Drive

A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.

General project update:

ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC) [reply]

My belated apologies

I just realized (when another Wikipedia editor answered a question of mine with a follow-up response) that I was extremely rude to you last month. I wanted to apologize. (This was the incident in question):

[[3]]

Beauty School Dropout (talk) 23:51, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Diak4 opening RfC based on objection to "left-wing partisanship" in Alternative for Germany

Hey there. I just wanted to see if you would be willing to take part in an RFC that User:Diak4 has opened an RfC on the lede for Alternative for Germany [here that goes as follows: "I am concerned of the partisan nature of this sentence and it disrupting the neutrality of the page since it is making an allegation that many supporters of this party are racists, neo-nazi's, etc. I am even more particularly concerned with the sources being so biased against this party as well as being partisan, left-wing sites. I understand that this is not against WP:RS however it brings the opinion of these sites and states them as facts on the Alternative for Germany page." This is based on a previous discussion here:[4]. -- Wilner (Speak to me) 12:07, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Years new page backlog drive

Hello Sakura Cartelet/Archives, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!

We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!

The backlog drive will begin on January 1^st and run until January 29^th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.

Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:

The total number of reviews completed for the month.
The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.

NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC) [reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Sakura Cartelet/Archives, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!

New Year Backlog Drive results:

We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!

General project update:

ACTRIAL will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Hope you come back

Hope you come back. While John's message was right, how it was conveyed was really poor. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:37, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit and my warning

I am disappointed in your blatant assumption of bad faith editing on my part. Please retract the "warning" since it wasn't my intention to add any "libel" to the page. Sakura Cartelet^Talk 20:41, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also in case you missed it. I officially apologized to the anon here after I had realized my mistake in the revert and didn't revert any further. Sakura Cartelet^Talk 21:00, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure how you expect me to 'retract the "warning"' as you have already removed it with a hostile edit summary. If the mistake isn't going to be repeated then there's nothing to worry about. If you already knew it was a mistake and have apologised then that's even better. Unfortunately you did add libel to a page on a living person, and I had to remove it, so that's what the warning was for. Never mind. I'm sure you'll be more careful in the future. --John (talk) 06:16, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review Newsletter No.10

Hello Sakura Cartelet/Archives, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:

ACTRIAL's six month experiment restricting new page creation to (auto)confirmed users ended on 14 March. As expected, a greatly increased number of unsuitable articles and candidates for deletion are showing up in the feed again, and the backlog has since increased already by ~30%. Please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day.

Paid editing

Now that ACTRIAL is inoperative pending discussion, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies. A further discussion is currently taking place at: Can a subject specific guideline invalidate the General Notability Guideline?

Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled

While patrolling articles, if you find an editor that is particularly competent at creating quality new articles, and that user has created more than 25 articles (rather than stubs), consider nominating them for the 'Autopatrolled' user right HERE.

News

The next issue Wikipedia's newspaper The Signpost has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it, including ACTRIAL wrap-up that will be of special interest to New Page Reviewers. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. The Signpost is one of the best ways to stay up date with news and new developments - please consider subscribing to it. All editors of Wikipedia and associated projects are welcome to submit articles on any topic for consideration by the The Signpost's editorial team for the next issue.

To opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.11 25 May 2018

Hello Sakura Cartelet/Archives, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:

WP:ACREQ has been implemented. The flow at the feed has dropped back to the levels during the trial. However, the backlog is on the rise again so please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day; a backlog approaching 5,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Deletion tags

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders. They require your further verification.

Backlog drive:

A backlog drive will take place from 10 through 20 June. Check out our talk page at WT:NPR for more details. NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

Editathons

There will be a large increase in the number of editathons in June. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

Paid editing - new policy

Now that ACTRIAL is ACREQ, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. There is a new global WMF policy that requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies.

Not English

A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, tag as required, then move to draft if they do have potential.

News

Development is underway by the WMF on upgrades to the New Pages Feed, in particular ORES features that will help to identify COPYVIOs, and more granular options for selecting articles to review.
The next issue of The Signpost has been published. The newspaper is one of the best ways to stay up to date with news and new developments. between our newsletters.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:35, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPP Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello Sakura Cartelet/Archives, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.

Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive!

As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar: . Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: , , , .
Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ramya Krishnan

Not sure why the question was deleted from the help desk; newish editors often post like that. Their request showed up on my watchlist and I just clicked on their contribs. directly from there to find the page and save time. I then saw your 'ping' from the other TP but when I got there, that had been deleted too! Cheers. Eagleash (talk) 20:06, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Broome

Thanks for digging up this link. This dispute has highlighted (as people at WP:AWNB are noting) that a lot of these articles could really do with stronger referencing - it'd be great if you could add that and anything else you dig up where appropriate. It's never been an area I've edited in, but after this I might have to dedicate a bit of time myself when I get the chance. The Drover's Wife (talk) 01:59, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]