Talk:Leafa

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 January 2024. The result of the discussion was merge.

Leafa was nominated as a Video games good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 21, 2017). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Anime and manga Low‑importance

	Anime and manga portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fictional characters

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Evaluating for B class criteria

After checking all of the B-class criteria for Leafa, the page seems to pass all of the criteria that was stated on the criteria page. The only thing that might need to be rechecked is the accessibility criteria since as a fan of the show I might be slightly biases in that area. Sakuura Cartelet ^Talk 02:57, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Leafa/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ISD (talk · contribs) 19:57, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I've spotted some things that may want to be changed before being promoted to GA status.

In the infobox, the caption for the image of Leafa should probably make it clear that is how the character appears in ALFheim Online, as opposed to any other possible appearance in the other games in the series.
Keep the styling of ALFheim Online constant throughout. In some cases in the article the game is written as Alfheim Online instead.
It is best to highlight Kirito's full name, because sometimes the article refers to him by his actual first name of Kazuto, but there is no explanation in the article that the names are related until about half-way through the piece. Also may want to write Asuna's full name too. Best add the full names at the start of the article.
Might want to add a link to Wikipedia article on player killing where it is mentioned in the article.
Punctuation issues in the "Reception" section. Namely, before beginning the quotes, remember to put in the correct punctuation beforehand (i.e. a colon or comma – not entirely sure on the American styling as I'm British). Also, probably best to use single quotation marks when quoting something in a quote (i.e. "Suguha's unrequited love seems more like a play meant to pander to "Big Brother Complex" fans", probably should be: "Suguha's unrequited love seems more like a play meant to pander to 'Big Brother Complex' fans").

Hope this of good use. Also, I currently have nominated another article Yuri on Ice for GA status, so if you would be interested in reviewing my nomination it would be much appreciated. ISD (talk) 19:57, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Sakura Cartelet: I see that ISD has already given comments above, and for the most part I agree with his statements. Just want to add something, though this could be important if the article is to pass this GAN: is there any information available about the development of Suguha/Leafa? Most of our articles on anime characters have at least some kind of "Creation and conception" or "Development" section. Reki Kawahara has given several interviews in both Japanese and Western media, so it's possible that he has made comments about Suguha. In addition, you could also rely on author's note if you or Satellizer have access to them. Other than that, I'm not seeing any issues that have not already been raised by ISD. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:45, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As none of the changes have been carried out, I have no choice but to fail this nomination. Once a user manages to make all the changes that have been requested as part of the nomination, then it should be recognised as a nomination again. ISD (talk) 08:07, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@ISD: Bit late I know, but I should've fixed all the issues you pointed out. I won't bother restarting the GAN though, I'm probably not active enough on Wikipedia for that. All yours @Narutolovehinata5 and Sakura Cartelet: :) Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 11:56, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Satellizer: @Narutolovehinata5 and Sakura Cartelet: Thanks for making the changes. If the article does get renominated I'm sure it would probably now pass. ISD (talk) 18:31, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]