User talk:DeadEyeArrow

This user may have left Wikipedia. DeadEyeArrow has not edited Wikipedia since December 2008. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

The DEA is currently busy.

Main

Talk

Decline of Deletion

Deletion of a page because it was NOT IN ENGLISH, and has no relevant reason to not be in English, such as organization made mainly of Mexicans or a Language icon indicating you speak Spanish - in this case, that did not apply. It seems the deletion box, however, did not make my reason of NOT IN ENGLISH show up. So I don't know whether or not this "decline" was done with the knowledge of my reason or without it.

Also, if you "declined" all by yourself, I assume you are an administrator.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:MJCdetroit/Userboxes/D_G_Catholica_Romana&action=history

~ Rayvn (talk) 22:51, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am an administrator and yes the reason of "not in English" did show up in the deletion box. But such a reason is not a valid speedy deletion criteria for user pages, hence it was declined. —[DeadEyeArrow – Talk – Contribs] 23:33, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reporting Vandalism Template?

Hi, do you know a template for quickly reporting vandalism? Greg Comlish (talk) 16:50, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's no template that I know of but most the various tools at WP:CUV/T have reporting functions. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 16:34, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

user:166.109.0.203 Ban

This is a school district ip address i actually do attend high school in the district i would like to make a suggesting to permanently blocking this ip address because all 99.9% of the edits made from this is vandalism and i believe that no mater what it will continue.I think it would be better if people were forced to make a account in order to edit articles.

Thanks Staffwaterboy ^Talk^♂ 16:19, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We don't perm block IPs, no matter their vandalistic history. Those IPs can always get reassigned and that could cause a lot of collateral damage. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 16:32, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous User 72.241.101.20

Hi DEA - On 31 March, you issued a gentle warning (more in the nature of a friendly reminder) to anonymous user 72.241.101.20. However, I note that 72.241.101.20 has now deleted your comments from his/her user/discussion page, and also deleted comments he didn't like from Zagalejo (who apparently later restored his comments, overriding 72.241.101.20's deletion). Just thought you should know that your comments have been deleted by the anonymous user. It's a bit silly, really, because the history is there, plain for all to see, and nobody is attacking 72.241.101.20 - in fact, he/she has made some good edits in the recent past, but occasionally gone a bit too far with several edits or deletions. It appears that he/she is a new contributor, so I don't believe there is any ill-will involved - just some need for him/her to have a better understanding of Wikipedia's processes. Cheers from New Zealand,--Georgette.mccallum (talk) 19:49, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Doug

(moved here from User talk:Doug for unified discussion)

What's with this: Here? --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 15:51, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for no explanation, an IP canvassing with potentially libelous material about a third party. I probably should've deleted it rather than just reverting it but it looks like it's been oversighted now. See Wikipedia:ANI#Strange_message_by_anon, not that it will give you much more information. --Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 17:02, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help!

Yo DEA I need your help with user Scetoaux. --InvisibleDiplomat₆⁶₆ 22:07, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He is, of course, referring to Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts#User:Twaz. — scetoaux (T|C) 22:09, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your Help is Needed

Currently, there is a dispute going on at WP:PW over the format of one of the matches at a pay-per-view event. This has been getting a little bit out of hand, which led to the article being fully protected. What I'm asking of you is to do to WT:PW#WrestleMania XXIV - Fully-Protected, read over the thread and put in your input. I know you are a reliable administrator, and if you, as an outside reader, can solve this issue it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your time! iMatthew 20 08 00:42, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:N/CA

Because of the limited discussion, this proposal was marked rejected. It can be resurrected at any time, and may become useful in the future, but for now, just wanted to thank you for all the help you gave in tightening up the text etc. Best wishes Fritzpoll (talk) 15:40, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Could you tell me how to redirect pages. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.161.69.75 (talk) 10:05, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Responded on your talk page. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 18:11, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Project

Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.

If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 02:57, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi There Dead Eye Arrow!

I have just started to add images to Wiki and made an attempt with an image gallery on the Mars page as well as the Phoenix Spacecraft page. As someone with much more experience then I have can you let me know if I did this correctly because I went on to check them this morning and they were gone:( I do think that the pictures have value, would it have been better if I added just one image of the avalanche on the right side of the page?

Also you mentioned that the image gallery is better suited to the Mars Geology subpage do you think this is something I should go ahead and add?

Thanks for your help!Sepeople (talk) 14:06, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

I really appreciate your help Dead Eye Arrow :) Thank you for your advice!Sepeople (talk) 15:26, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chilean salmon sector Pt 2

Dear DeadEyeArrow,

I published the same article on Wikibooks, but it was also deleted there. Reason: it should be placed on Wikipedia!

Any advice?

Regards,

Adrianuz

(talk) 15:26, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mike & DEA,

It seems that the salmon article is 'locked in' between Wikibooks and Wikipedia. Can we find a solution? The information itself is very useful for those who are both interested and active in the sector. The article explains the roots of the Chilean salmon sector; i.e. why does it exist and how did it develop.

Regards,

Bcbolman/Adrianuz

(talk) 00:30, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Gtscx.jpg

please explain why the image Image:Gtscx.jpg from flickr is; "# Pure vandalism. This includes blatant and obvious misinformation, and redirects created by cleanup from page-move vandalism."

-- Chzz ► 03:40, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for the claim of vandalism, that wasn't your intent. But it is a shock image and immediately deletable. Previous discussions at Talk:Goatse.cx have leaned towards not including an image on the page. You're welcome to bring it up there again. Considering the nature of the image I feel you should have done so in the first place. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 04:02, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

considering you have admitted your reason for deletion was incorrect, I suggest you a) immediately restore the image, and then b) perhaps think of another reason for deletion and do so. -- Chzz ► 04:05, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was already done before you replied. If a discussion goes in the way of inclusion, I'd restore it, or rather one with the proper copyright info. Otherwise, you know where to take the issue. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 04:19, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stale warning

WTF did I do to Birdman's article?

Shit!

Responded on users talk, it's just an old stale warning. Just ignore it. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 07:22, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Star of Bethlehem

Thanks for nominating Star of Bethlehem for feature article status. I did most of the writing and shepherded the article to "GA" status, so I feel it's my baby. Kauffner (talk) 14:11, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

YW, I apologize though for not giving inquiry before nominating. It was rather late when I did the FAC and skipped a step. Nonetheless, I do feel it could be featured and in the end the scrutiny can only lead to improvement. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 18:16, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was nice for a while, but now it's looking pretty grim. Redoing all the references would take hours and hours and nobody reading the article would even notice the difference. And they just keep piling on. I have never seen any article that follows all those citeria, featured or not. Maybe they object to everything -- and least some them don't want to feature anything Christian. They don't want us to reference the Bible? What can you say to that?Kauffner (talk) 21:25, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There have been questions about using the bible as a reference in the past. They are not objecting on any religious basis, it is just the very high expectations for articles that are to represent the best of the wiki. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 02:09, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Despite how the FAC is going, I think the article itself is shaping up quite nicely. Thanks for all your hard work. I think the lead should be a bit longer and there should be a "Further reading" section for printed material. We also need to figure what to do all the citations Rbreen added. He put in about 20 books cites just to make a few small points. I'm not looking forward to reformating them, but he will not be a happy camper if we delete them. If the citation format is inconstant, that will certain come up in any future review. I've been looking at different feature articles lately to try to a good model follow. But IMO, we are already a step above most of the current feature articles. Kauffner (talk) 18:26, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks very much for your help with cleaning up after the page move vandalism. PhilKnight (talk) 20:02, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

np.--ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 20:05, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you...

...for fixing my stuff, after that lunatic swept through wikipedia like a tornado. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 20:35, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

np. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 20:55, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, muffin physics

The link to muffin physics on the muffin page was real. Seriously, wasn't that one of the subtler funny things you had seen in quite a while? Why be such a killjoy? If this web site can't make fun of itself anywhere, it has serious problems. Almost as bad as the problems in any upcoming muffin physics research papers. If you think this encyclopedia is just for the more noble pursuits, then why have 500 word article on muffins that does little but define them and all their possibilities? How serious is that? Pdbailey (talk) 21:13, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yea it was funny, but this isn't uncyclopedia. Which btw has it's own bit bout muffin physics. I'm all for humour on the wiki, but it should be kept off the article space. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 21:32, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My Rfa

Thanks, DeadEyeArrow, for participating in my recent RfA, which recently passed with 81 support and 1 neutral !votes. I appreciate all the support and constructive criticism offered in my RfA and I thank you for taking the time to !vote in my nomination. I feel so honoured to be trusted by so many of you and please, if you have any advice, comments or complaints about my actions as an administrator, leave a note on my talk page.

I would also like to thank Acalamari, Rlevse and Nishkid64, for their nomination statements.
Thank you again.
AngelOfSadness talk 23:30, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your tag "needs citations" on Figaro Systems

Hello - I am the creator of that article. I cited 19 sources; 11 are articles about the company or its technology from US newspapers, trade or other journals, or other neutral and independent sources. The remainder of the citations are to the company's official website. Please suggest how to improve this article. Thanks, Leoniana (talk) 23:24, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The other citations are okay, but ultimately the ones that are from the website aren't appropriate for Wikipedia, particularly the ones in the venues, awards and products section. They need to be replaced with reliable third party sources. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 23:55, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again - I have improved the article with additional reliable third-party sources, and done general cleanup of the refs. Have a look. Leoniana (talk) 20:01, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Software invite

Hello DeadEyeArrow. You have been invited to join WikiProject Software, a WikiProject dedicated to improving the Software-related articles on Wikipedia. You received this invitation due to your interest in, or edits relating to or within the scope of the project. If you would like to join or just help out a bit, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of project members. You may also wish to add {{User WikiProject Software}} to your userpage and {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Software/Announcement-u}} to the top of your talk page with the heading ==WikiProject Software Announcement==. If you know someone who might be interested, please pass this message onto others by pasting this code into their talk page {{Software invite|~~~~}} with the following heading == WikiProject Software ==.

Thanks,
Tyw7, Leading Innovations ‍ ‍‍ (Talk ● Contributions) 11:38, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Let it Be

Thanks for that. It's difficult to know where it should go; the song, the album or the film, so I hope you'll forgive my confusion. Arguably it should go to a DAB page but then since it's all Beatles, who can say what the target should be, with appropriate hatnotes? Next time I may well look at the page hits to see where most readers are actually going. --Rodhull andemu 23:24, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. Hopefully it won't cause any confusion. --Rodhull andemu 00:03, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I used your redirect barnstar

Thanks for creating it! :) I just awarded it to two editors that have done a lot of work with a list of redirects --Enric Naval (talk) 00:47, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, I been meaning to move it to the template space and add it to WP:BARN. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 01:16, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You should probably do it. There is already a Template Barnstar and a Categorisation Barnstar, after all :) --Enric Naval (talk) 01:27, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want me to make for you the work to move the barnstar to wikipedia space and list it at WP:BARN? I just can't stand seeing the poor thing not on the same standing as the rest of barnstars :) --Enric Naval (talk) 01:48, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, yeah you can go ahead and move it. I never did cause I just don't like the image. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 02:41, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, the image can always be replaced with a better one. What I like is the existance of a barnstar to reward good contributions to the redirects are. I'm gonna move it now. --Enric Naval (talk) 21:42, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bitin'

Howdy! I saw the stern warning you left for the anon user who deleted AN/I. It's a high profile page, sure, but based on his edit history, it could have just been an accident. There's no history of vandalism, so please be careful to avoid accidentally biting the new folks! I like to assume accident until presented with better evidence. Cheers! - CHAIRBOY (☎) 03:41, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I take it back, I guess it was an IP jumping vandal. Mea culpa. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 04:15, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay, it could have easily turned out that I slighted an anon but I did think it was pretty suspicious. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 04:23, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Facepalm

Again, sorry for blocking you, that was the dumbest thing I've done... all day. :( BJ^Talk 07:15, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And again, it's no big deal, shit happens. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 07:35, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help check it out

Could you maybe help out on these page with displaying references in is own section; tidy it up a bit Kelvin Martinez (talk) 21:57, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Honorific titles in popular music

Thank You Thank you Thank You for fixing up this page. The last time I made a page was List of Best Selling Remix albums. Things were diffrent a year and a half ago lol. Sorry if i made a mess for asking for a lot of help I knew the page was a dozze. Kelvin Martinez (talk) 03:47, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

music honorifics

Just caught your inuse tag. I made five or six edits before seeing it. I'll stay out of the page for a bit, but I removed lead refs after a number of female singers at the end of the article (everyone with their name now formatted with a sub-header). Sorry about that. The editor who created the page appears to have spam requested help with the page, which created a bit of a mess. Hiberniantears (talk) 00:29, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oops

It looks like I accidentally removed a post of your in AN/I while removing a resolved complaint, but the other user fixed it. Jut wanted to et you know that it wasn't intended. Everything is fine. Nothing to see here. :) - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 20:34, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jelena Spiric page

Hi there,

I have deleted Jelena Spiric user page last night and tonight again on her wish, and you brought it back..Please contact her at gipsyka4@yahoo.com if you don't believe me..I'm the one who created it in the first place.

Sasa —Preceding unsigned comment added by NEbasketball (talk • contribs) 02:17, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Al-kitab(Quran) deletion

without discussing on talk page the article was deleted is this wikkipedea policy? does wikkipedea not consider the Qurani ayats refrences as reliable source for an article of Quran? if so, then wikkipeadea is nopropagating truth but people hiersay about Quran. thanks ```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by Farrukh38 (talk • contribs) 14:47, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was deleted through an articles for deletion discussion which is pretty much the standard for deletions. Since you took part in the discussion I don't need to restate it's conclusion but the predominant view seems to be that there wasn't any verification for any of the claims in the article. The Quran is a reliable source, but it's also a primary source, which means any claims made with it need to be verified with other sources. —[DeadEyeArrow – Talk – Contribs] 20:00, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

HAPPY FIRST EDIT DAY!

from the BIRTHDAYCOMMITTEE

Wishing DeadEyeArrow a very Happy First Edit Day!

Have a fantastic day!

From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee

SchfiftyThree 20:43, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, three years. /me goes back to feeling old. —[DeadEyeArrow – Talk – Contribs] 21:52, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

101 Philosophy

Try improving it, not vandalising it ...

Docmartincohen (talk) 19:18, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The sum of my actions on that page amount to one pagemove and one proposed deletion and I haven't edited that page in a couple days, so please don't come here accusing me of vandalism. —[DeadEyeArrow – Talk – Contribs] 19:31, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!!

Thanks for the support!!! Check it Out Honorific titles in popular music with any feedback Talk:Honorific titles in popular music Kelvin Martinez (talk) 13:05, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfB Thank You spam

Thank you for participating in my RfB! I am very grateful for the confidence of the community shown at my RfB, which passed by a count of 154/7/2 (95.65%). I have read every word of the RfB and taken it all to heart. I truly appreciate everyone's input: supports, opposes, neutrals, and comments. Of course, I plan to conduct my cratship in service of the community. If you have any advice, questions, concerns, or need help, please let me know. Again, Thanks! — Rlevse • Talk • 08:48, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Faculty of pharmacy-ain shams university

Dear DeadEyeArrow I recreated Faculty of pharmacy-ain shams university using the data from the previous one and the web site, Ain Shams University is composed of a set of separated faculties In different places, I tried to merge this article but I found a page for Ain Shams University Faculty of Medicine, so I continue with the used style. I think the original Author was playing not writing, but I’ll try to enhance it more till someone from this faculty handles it. The name of this is Faculty is "Ain Shams University Faculty of Pharmacy" so can you please rename it as the used rule in Egypt is University->Faculty->Collages then schools. Best Regards--Puttyschool (talk) 21:02, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

72.204.224.77

Thanks for the alert. The articles are outside his normal range so I hadn't noticed. FYI, the banned user is Harvardlaw (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). If you ever see a similar pattern of edits by any other accounts please let me know. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 17:55, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ten-string guitar

Please, if this is such an issue, then YOU please fix it so the move of Andrewa is undone to the correct, previous location of the article. I do not have time to follow your red tape beurocracy to correct my own article every single time it is butchered by some idiot. This is OBVIOUSLY misspelt. In English we hyphenate terms like 10-string, six-string, etc. The move is simply ignorant. The article was fine the way it was. PLUS, Andrewa introduces redundant information. A baroque guitar is a FIVE-COURSE guitar, not a '10-string guitar'. A "course" being a pair of strings that act as ONE. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.94.133.166 (talk) 07:39, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive user returns

Please take a look at Bigelarkin12 (talk · contribs) - most recent is [1]. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 02:32, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, left them a message, will keep a lookout. —[DeadEyeArrow – Talk – Contribs] 09:38, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Cirt (talk) 17:39, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, please see [2]. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 20:59, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AFD

I have requested clarification here. Best, NonvocalScream (talk) 18:48, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barry Callebaut

Hey, i recently passed by the Barry Callebaut article and noticed that it read like a publicity brochure. Edit history shows that IP 217.193.137.163 reduced the article to the basic company blurb a while ago; looks like you fixed it once, but then they re-edited it again shortly after and removed a lot of the info that was there. The IP in question belongs to the company's HQ.

I spent some time trying to fix it up and give it a bit more structure, but I'm not sure how succesful I was in doing so. I'm not a native english speaker, and I'm not entirely NPOV on the topic myself since I work for a supplier of theirs. I was hoping you (as the last intelligent neutral editor to the article) could have another look.

Thanks in advance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.133.166.46 (talk) 00:56, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sethu Institute of Technology removed

Hello

I was searching to see if there is something new about my alma mater and discovered that there is no such page. When I wanted to start an article, it find that there had been a page but had been deleted some time ago. Why is that? It does tell us about Blatant Copyright infringement.....can't understand how some one can do that to a page about an engineering college.

Can I go ahead and start a new page? Or can you let me know what was so wrong about the page?

Jsshenba (talk) 09:49, 8 September 2008 (UTC) Moorthi[reply]

My RfA

Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (166/43/7). I appreciate your comments and in my actions as an administrator I will endeavor to maintain the trust you have placed in me. I am honored by your trust and your support. Thank you, Cirt (talk) 01:58, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw this randomly as I was searching something my friend said.

February 2008 Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mininova, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 20:53, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

My concern is that I've never made any changes to Wikipedia, ever. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.0.142.249 (talk) 00:34, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pwease?

I found an uberful message on Mandarax's talk page that you left (This one) and was wondering if you'd let me use the

"

In thanks for fixing the vandalism/blanking/attack on one/some/all of my userpages I reward you this bootleg CD of your favorite band/musician.

"

thing. I'd of course replace a bit of it (mostly the part referring to the userpages) but otherwise it would remain the same... So? Moocowsrule (talk) 05:20, 29 October 2008 (UTC)moocowsrule[reply]

Yea you can use it, no problem. --[DeadEyeArrow – Talk – Contribs] 06:23, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Moocowsrule (talk) 04:10, 30 October 2008 (UTC)moocowsrule[reply]

Happy first edit day!

HAPPY FIRST EDIT DAY!

from the BIRTHDAYCOMMITTEE

Wishing DeadEyeArrow a very Happy First Edit Day!

Have a fantastic day!

From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee

--I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 18:37, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hi, I nominated Ergogenic aid for speedy deletion.

Best wishes,Rich (talk) 04:22, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Deadeyearrow

A long time ago you helped me on List of Honorific titles, Can you give your opinion on it on this. page .http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_honorific_titles_in_popular_music_(2nd_nomination) Kelvin Martinez (talk) 09:59, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ramparts of Quebec City

Hi, I wanted to move this article with a new name, Fortifications of Québec National Historic Site, because that is the official Parks Canada name. Since you created the article and made many edits, I wanted to make sure that was OK. Jllm06 (talk) 19:27, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day (2010)

HAPPY FIRST EDIT DAY!

from the BIRTHDAYCOMMITTEE

Wishing DeadEyeArrow a very Happy First Edit Day!

Have a fantastic day!

From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee

Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 23:32, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kidneythieves-Trickster.jpg

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Kidneythieves-Trickster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 06:52, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Conflictofinterest.jpg

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Conflictofinterest.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:16, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Suspiria (album).jpg

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Suspiria (album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:46, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Metatron (album).jpg

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Metatron (album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:59, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suspension of admin privileges due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 20:20, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:TypeONegative-ChristianWoman.ogg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:TypeONegative-ChristianWoman.ogg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 21:26, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Thirdmoon

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Thirdmoon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ReformedArsenal (talk) 21:08, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thirdmoon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thirdmoon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thirdmoon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ReformedArsenal (talk) 02:03, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:TypeONegative-ChristianWoman.ogg)

Thanks for uploading File:TypeONegative-ChristianWoman.ogg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of change

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you would need to seek a new WP:RFA. Until December 30, you can file a request at WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 04:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(delivered by mabdul 23:13, 3 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Doubletree Resort Lodge & Spa Fallsview

Hello. I am looking through the articles which have been tagged for notability for 5 years, and came across this, which you nominated for speedy deletion. It was removed. If you still feel it should be deleted, you might want to consider taking it to prod or AfD. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 09:46, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Tungston" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tungston. Since you had some involvement with the Tungston redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:42, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vargaresa – The Beginning

The article Vargaresa – The Beginning has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NALBUM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:56, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]