User talk:RoundTeen

Welcome

Hello RoundTeen and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Help pages
Tutorial
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing?

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:40, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! RoundTeen, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:40, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Black Box (radio)

Hello! We welcome your contributions however I noticed while patrolling new pages that you created an article, Black Box (radio) that does not include any citations (references) whatsoever. The article as it exists does not provide evidence of the notability of the subject as per our guidelines WP:GNG nor WP:NCORP, and may be deleted or moved to draft. Because we are an encyclopedia, it is essential that all claims in articles are sourced to secondary or tertiary reliable sources that are fully independent of the subject. Please add reliable sourcing, and if you need help you can contact the WP:TEAHOUSE to ask questions. There are friendly, experienced editors that can provide help! Thank you, Netherzone (talk) 14:38, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, the citation you added does not mention Black Box (radio) at all. Perhaps you included the wrong URL? Netherzone (talk) 13:36, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Netherzone It looks like a translation from frwiki, and the citation goes to a dead link. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 04:28, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ado FM moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ado FM, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:10, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

Hi, RoundTeen! I'm Sammi Brie, and I'm an editor on radio and television topics on the English Wikipedia. I'm familiar with and have had an impact on important policies that govern radio station articles here.

I see you're porting articles from the French Wikipedia. This is great! But I have a few suggestions, which I've implemented at BlackBox (radio station). (Note the changed title—we don't use "(radio)" as a disambiguation for stations, and the name is written CamelCased.)

It is not practice on the English Wikipedia to have galleries of former logos or lists of former slogans.
On the English Wikipedia, unlike in French, citations are placed after punctuation.
Some of the articles seem to need more sourcing, being somewhat flimsy in French.

I am not a French speaker or writer, but I do know Spanish, so I'm not totally lost. I have written four articles on Paris stations myself (the Jewish set: Radio Shalom Paris etc.). Most importantly, I can help you navigate what you need to improve your pages. Please feel free to ping me if you need anything. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 04:48, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Imen Es, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 09:01, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Radio station articles

Hi - I'm taking this here, because I see you are doing similar things at more than one article. If a radio station changes its name, we do not need (or want) to maintain two separate articles about it - we can simply move the existing article to the current name, and use redirects to help readers find the article they're looking for. Does that make sense? Girth Summit _(blether) 12:48, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres, as you did to ABC Family Worldwide, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Catalyzzt (talk) 13:48, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Alternative rock, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 11:50, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:58, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Thibaut120094. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, MCM Pop, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Thibaut (talk) 14:47, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cut-and-paste moves

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Ouï FM a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 14:09, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Poto (Wejdene song) moved to draftspace

Thanks for creating Poto (Wejdene song). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and See WP:NSONG. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I win

I made more backgrounds black than you I win — Preceding unsigned comment added by KAISEAN W. (talk • contribs) 18:18, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Poto (song)

The article Poto (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails to meet WP:NSONG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:25, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Poto (song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Poto (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poto (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hey man im josh (talk) 21:26, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Poto cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Poto cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Alternative R&B albums by American artists

A tag has been placed on Category:Alternative R&B albums by American artists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:31, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Blueberry72 (talk) 18:05, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at My Type (Saweetie song), you may be blocked from editing. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 19:16, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at 10:35. Ss112 08:51, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rate Your Music

Please do not use Rate Your Music as a source for genres of music, Wikipedia does not consider this site as a reliable source. Please check this link from Wikiproject out: WP:NOTRSMUSIC. Blueberry72 (talk) 19:14, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced genres

Hello. You've been a registered editor for over two months now. You should know that all content added to Wikipedia needs to be sourced per WP:V, so I'm confused about you adding your own assessment of genres that isn't backed up by any source to 10:35. Please do not do this in future otherwise one of the other editors who has warned on you on your talk page may report you, which may lead to a block. Thanks. Ss112 08:53, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Selfish (Madison Beer song)

Please follow Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Record charts and Template:Single chart as both templates state it has to be a number — not “tip”. Obviously this is difficult for you to understand as many editors have clearly been posting their difficulties with you on your talk page which you seemingly ignore. If you revert or change it back to “tip” I’ll be reaching out to an admin. Pillowdelight (talk) 10:13, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Europe 2, you may be blocked from editing. Your WP:CUTANDPASTE move has been reverted multiple times in the last several days. This is not acceptable. Not only is the change against policy, making the same change over and over is also. Please read the advice you have been given and ask for help if you don't understand it. MB 01:49, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Tant besoin de toi. I see you have been warned multiple times about unsoruced material, yet on Tant besoin de toi you added a certification without a source and a chart with a wrong peak. Please verify all your sources. Muhandes (talk) 09:05, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You also continue to be distrupive and edit war after many warnings. I think a block is imminent if you don't stop. --Muhandes (talk) 09:15, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Charts in France is not considered a reliable source. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 14:08, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are now engaged in an edit war at Girls (Rita Ora song)

Per WP:V and WP:RECORDCHARTS we have rules about what constitutes a reliable chart. There is no information at Charts in France which proves it is a reliable or accurate provider of charts on behalf of SNEP. You were asked to stop adding this information and you have clearly ignored this. You were asked to take the discussion to the talkpage and clearly ignored this. Can you please explain on what basis you think Charts in France is a reliable source? >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 12:20, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked you to stop and discuss. You continue to add charts in Frnace without a consensus. You're either being ignorant or deliberately obtuse. See and engage in the discussion here. See WP:BRD - you have been reverted, you SHOULD NOT add this information back in or you may be blocked or banned. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 13:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Alternative pop songs

A tag has been placed on Category:Alternative pop songs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:10, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you adding weekly charts to a year-end charts section?

You've made this [1] [2] edit twice now to Under the Influence (Chris Brown song). Please pay attention to what you're adding. That is a weekly chart, not the French year-end position. Thank you. Ss112 06:50, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you still doing this? Next time you do this I'm informing an administrator. You refuse to engage with the three editors (myself, an IP editor, and Everm4e) who've reverted/called you out for this or explain yourself. You cannot just be being confused any longer. Stop adding weekly-published charts to year-end charts sections. Ss112 11:36, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreliable charts

This has been explained to you multiple times already. Shazam chart is obviously a single-vendor chart and should not be used. I'm starting to wonder if this is a problem of incompetence or are you doing it on purpose. Please stop adding oddball charts. If you are incapable of judging which charts are reliable (as you demonstrate time after time), stick to the recommended charts. --Muhandes (talk) 10:45, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This chart here has also been removed. See WP:V. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 22:31, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No More Warnings / Plus d'avertissements

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 22:32, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

en français

Plus d'avertissements

Vous pouvez être bloqué de l'édition sans autre avertissement la prochaine fois que vous ajouterez du matériel non sourcé ou mal sourcé à Wikipedia.

(@Ss112 @Pillowdelight @Muhandes FYI next time no more warnings, its straight to ANI to request a block/ban) >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 11:51, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Lil-unique1: Yes, I just had enough of it, they simply ignore all "last" warnings, I don't see the point anymore. Reported here, in case you want to chime in. --Muhandes (talk) 12:32, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 12:29, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 05:30, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely final warning

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Baby (Aya Nakamura song). You were already blocked once. Continue this behavior and the next block will be much longer. Muhandes (talk) 09:10, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Same thing here. I just realized the extent of the damage you did to so many articles. Please stop this immediately. --Muhandes (talk) 09:49, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Case it appears that RoundTeen hasn't learnt their lesson from your 24hour block. Does this need to go back to the ANI? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lil-unique1 (talk • contribs) 12:11, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seconding that, again here. I guess the ping didn't come through because of the lack of signature, Daniel Case can you help? --Muhandes (talk) 22:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 03:04, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Daniel Case. We now have WP:BE from sock IP: Special:Diff/1135057214. I don't think they get it. --Muhandes (talk) 11:53, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The /64 range on that one has been blocked for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 18:39, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 09:33, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case and Lil-unique1: This user has inserted unsourced genres with no explanation again: [3], [4]. Ss112 22:52, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I Miss U (Nej' song) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, I Miss U (Nej' song), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mooonswimmer 17:50, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revert without explanation

Don't revert users without explanation. You just got unblocked from a block from disruption. Is this really the best thing to be doing? Don't revert constructive edits without a reason. Ss112 22:33, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for violating Wikipedia's policy regarding neutrality by genre warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 23:03, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case: I believe RoundTeen is block evading using 80.4.124.10. Last night I got a notification that RoundTeen had connected an article I had created, Trustfall (song), to its Wikimedia entry. Several hours later, the IP makes this edit changing a genre on the same article. RoundTeen changed a genre on Lavender Haze here, and the IP editor also changed genres on Lavender Haze several days before that. Along with those two topics, the IP editor changed a genre on Don't Call Me Up on January 29, before RoundTeen edited the article the next day. Ss112 12:44, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ronisia moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ronisia. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 00:40, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nej' moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nej', is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:45, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023: Please make sure the source verifies the chart position you're adding at the time you add it

Please do not add or change content, as you did at My 21st Century Blues, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ss112 15:32, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ronisia

The article Ronisia has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mccapra (talk) 22:13, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Final Warning (PureCharts)

The discussion according to which PureCharts was declared unfit for use is linked here and found in the summary of the edit you have just reverted. If I find you adding this back to any of the pages on my watchlist I will be involving admins next time.--N Ø 02:12, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023: See WP:EXPLICITGENRE

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to My 21st Century Blues, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ss112 15:28, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated vandalism and unsourced changes

@Daniel Case: Hello Daniel, you might be interested to know this user is vandalising users' pages [5], vandalising their talk pages as well [6] then harassing them to be unblocked on a different language project [7], and typically making unsourced changes to genres [8]... and those are just edits in the last 24 hours. RoundTeen has been warned over numerous things since your last block of them, and I think it's safe to say nobody seems to know what they're playing at but none of it is good. Ss112 19:51, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case: More unsourced genre changes in addition to the above: [9]. Ss112 02:35, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 03:25, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RoundTeen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It's nonsense, you block me for stupid thing RoundTeen (talk) 10:21, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:36, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RoundTeen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia RoundTeen (talk) 10:38, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please tell us why, and discuss your inappropriate actions. 331dot (talk) 10:49, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RoundTeen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia because I contribute in my own way, I didn't want to commit vendalism or problems, it's truths that I don't put lies, please unblock me, in exchange I no longer contribute Wikipedia. RoundTeen (talk) 18:34, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You're blocked because you contributing "in your own way". Do you know why you are blocked? --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 18:48, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RoundTeen (talk) 18:34, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User is block evading

@Daniel Case: Hi Daniel, RoundTeen is block evading using the IP 2001:861:8481:3DA0:11C1:9BE4:D04D:6602. Other editors have brought up RoundTeen's habit of adding the French airplay chart, and I know from experience every Sunday RoundTeen will add some Belgian peaks when the charts are published, and they've made both of those sorts of edits. [10], [11]. You blocked RoundTeen for a month on March 19, they've continued making (denied) unblock requests but obviously they could not wait. Ss112 11:21, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have now blocked the /64 range on that one again for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 04:00, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case: RoundTeen is back harassing the French admin they were before their last block: [12] (honestly I thought you had extended their block when they were caught evading using the IP you blocked). Ss112 14:16, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I should have at that time; I may have been in a rush. Daniel Case (talk) 17:24, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User is continuing to make disruptive edits

@Daniel Case: RoundTeen is continuing to add PureCharts to articles after having the discussion where it was depricated explicitly pointed out to them in an above section. I don't see why the next block should not be indefinite given the extensive disruption and second chances documented above. Regards.--N Ø 14:00, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Daniel Case (talk) 17:23, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RoundTeen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't understand why you're blocking me, it's stupid, I'll tell you what the problem is you're discriminating against Chartsinfrance for some inexplicable reason, so I won't post again for your sake but it's stupid RoundTeen (talk) 17:39, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 17:47, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RoundTeen (talk) 17:39, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging @Daniel Case: to immediately file this to m:SRG for immediate referral to stewards. RoundTeen's disruptive dubious French chart behavior is now a cross-wiki issue. A lock shall be needed. 2600:1700:9BF3:220:4403:E009:6080:BD67 (talk) 03:26, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Daniel Case (talk) 04:02, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nej'

Hello, RoundTeen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nej', a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]