Jump to content

User talk:Rohith goura/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 5

October 2010

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. - 220.101 talk\Contribs 14:01, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits to infoboxes

Please read the template doucmentation - especially that of the "country" field. No flagicons are to be used. Please revert your changes. Mspraveen (talk) 16:54, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Mspraveen (talk) 11:40, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Hello Rohith goura, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of National Insurance Company Limited (India), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Logan Talk Contributions 00:00, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Welcoming new users.

Hi. I see you like welcoming new users. While this is sometimes a good idea, it's best to give them time to make some edits they can really be proud of, so that they really appreciate the welcome message. Please check first what kind of edits they have been making before welcoming new users, because we do not really want to encourage spammers and vandals. Thanks, and happy editing! --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:03, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Hi. I notice that you gave a {{uw-vandalism1}} warning to Dimma21 about his/her new article SM*SH. I have removed this warning, as I don't think it was appropriate. It seems that the user simply doesn't understand how to link to include images. Tommyjb (talk) 19:48, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Thakur Dal Singh

Dear Rohith, Thanks for your suggestions on the subject write up. I am a beginner and am still finding my way around in the sysyem. I will try to rectify the deficiencies. Pkandhal (talk) 09:36, 3 July 2011 (UTC)pkandhal

Thanks for the coffee, I appreciated it. Pkandhal (talk) 09:48, 3 July 2011 (UTC)pkandhal

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Sidhartha Mallya with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Noformation Talk 10:13, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

If you wish to nominate an article at WP:GAN please read and follow the instructions at that page, also please read Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Transition FAQ. You do not need to update the GAN page itself, in fact doing so just disrupts the bot. Also please note that it would be fairly pointless nominating an article which you have never worked on and which has a large citation needed banner at the top - a clear candidate for quickfail. Please read the good article criteria and be sure that you understand them thoroughly. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:14, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi. I have declined your speedy deletion request for Akaram, as none of the three reasons seemed applicable. It does not appear to be a test page, it is not empty of content, and its context appears quite clear. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:58, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Some falafel for you!

Thanks for the brownie :-) Very much appreciated. Hope you like falafel :-) Bogdan Nagachop (talk) 12:49, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello. I have replied to you on my Talk Page. Leasnam (talk) 03:31, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

There is a notice at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard concerning your use of Twinkle. Nev1 (talk) 18:33, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi there Rohith goura, and thanks for helping out with new page patrolling! Your help is really appreciated. I noticed that your recent nomination of the article Power System Relaying was made on speedy deletion grounds of A1, A3, and G2. I agree that A1 and A3 apply, but I see a problem - your nomination was only made 4 minutes after the article was created. It looks like the editor is actively working on the content of the article, so I have removed your tag for now. After the editor has had some time to improve the article, it may likely not qualify for A1 and A3 any more. If you think it should still be deleted then, you are welcome to nominate it again for one of our deletion processes. If you have any questions, you can ask them below as I'll be watching this page. All the best. — Mr. Stradivarius 10:50, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for advice!! regards RohG ??· 12:50, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011

Hi Rohith goura. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for Koshal, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers and review the criteria for speedy deletion. Particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion, proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. The reason stated incorrectly linked to a disambiguation place, not an article. Alexf(talk) 13:17, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello, and thanks for your work here at Wikipedia. In regards to this message you left on my page [1], the Rollback tool automatically marks all edits as minor. If you'll look at the edit that was reverted, it was clearly vandalism on a WP:BLP page, and should have been reverted as quickly as possible. Using Rollback was correct in this situation. Hope this clears things up for you.

By the way, we have a page here called don't template the regulars you might want to read. If you're talking to an editor who's been here for a while, it's common courtesy to actually leave them a personal message, and not just a template. It's not required but it is considered more personal, and better received.

Thanks again, and take care! Dayewalker (talk) 18:17, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Omg!! i'm really sorry abt that !! I have set my user login to remember for 30 days !! some one have used my account, probably my bro ! I apologize abt that! Thanks for the message u left me to know abt that!!If any thing going wrong please do message. Now i ill log out my account every time i login!! RohG ??· 12:40, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:100% Love Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:100% Love Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:03, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Archiving

Hi again Rohith goura, I just noticed that the archive link on this talk page seems to be broken. Do you need any help with fixing it? — Mr. Stradivarius 22:08, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Yea ! Sure..Thank you :) RohG ??· 01:14, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Ok, fixed it. Your talk page sections will now be archived after one month. Enjoy! — Mr. Stradivarius 08:55, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Hmm!! cool! RohG ??·

Hiii

Nagarjuna graduated from Eastern Michigan University, in Ypsilanti, Michigan, USA - This was published in EMU news letter.

If you wish to make any other changes, other than the above info, You are welcome, I am more than happy for your changes.

Kind Regards (183.82.193.202 (talk) 08:23, 2 August 2011 (UTC)).

It was reverted not because of that!!! Because of removing unexplained data from the article.hope u got me! ??U have to explain the removal of content at the edit summary. you are welcomed to wiki! and kindly don't remove content from wiki with out explaining !!! once check this link and comment on that![2] [3] [4] [5] what's this??? is this correctly sourced??and i kindly request u to use Sandbox to over come this. Happy Editing :)RohG ??·

Hello

I have made corrections in the education and research center. I replaced cyber towers picture with other picture.

I did not made any unexplained edits and did not participate in vandalism

I have corrected misleading info like dr. reddys listed in Public sector research institutes.

Further please do not undo all edits. Check which edit you wish to undo and use talk page.

I have made only spelling corrections and included details appropriately in appropriate section

Make your edits and corrections individually as per specific sectons do not undo all the edits.

You are free to make changes.

Thank you Kind Regards

(183.82.193.202 (talk) 14:49, 4 August 2011 (UTC)).

The Signpost: 08 August 2011

do not message me again

me what is ur problem????? I did not understand what ur trying to say I have not touched HYDERABAD article today, and will never do dont spoil my talk page I have just included some extra images in Hyderabad article

you dont like them then it is not vandalism??? first know the definition of vandalism

You dont like the images??? then delete them

Removing extra images from other articles and including them in Hyderabad article is not Vandalism???

PS: Do Not Message me

Good byee

(Dragonbooster4 (talk) 17:00, 13 August 2011 (UTC)).

Uhh

I lost interest in Hyderabad article. You please edit Hyderabad article, in which ever way you like You do what ever u want Don not message me (Dragonbooster4 (talk) 17:11, 13 August 2011 (UTC)).

DO not message me

You please revert my edits, which u dont like

(Dragonbooster4 (talk) 17:12, 13 August 2011 (UTC)).

Final warning

Rohith goura, you have been warned before about misusing Twinkle. Dragonbooster4's edits [6] [7] were clearly not vandalism and issuing a warning [8] was incorrect. This is your final warning: if you continue to abuse Twinkle you will not be allowed to use it. Nev1 (talk) 17:15, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:01, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 August 2011

Your DYK nomination has failed because the article is not new or recently expanded by 5x. You are requested to read the guidelines very carefully so as to avoid such failed DYKs in the future. AshLin (talk) 07:40, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Good Article reviews

Greetings. I can see you're enthusiastic and want to help out, but reviewing Good Article nominations isn't really recommended for beginning Wikipedians. To review a GA nomination properly, you really have to have a firm understanding of our manual of style, our content policies, etc., and those only come with a lot of practice. It's fine if you want to review my nomination, if you like, but after that I'd really encourage you to work on other parts of Wikipedia for a while. When you have more experience with these sorts of articles, then maybe you'll want to try GA reviews again later on. Thanks for understanding, – Quadell (talk) 18:58, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Citation Barnstar
the first person i talk to thanks Kookycat101 (talk) 16:29, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

thanks

was it you that edited my unicorn primary school page because if you did then thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kookycat101 (talkcontribs) 19:48, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Your GA review on Pale Blue Dot

Thank you for your initiative to review Pale Blue Dot at Talk:Pale Blue Dot/GA1. But I was neither notified of the closure of the review nor was I given any constructive feedback on improving the article. All I see is a list of no's and yes's which was not helpful at all. Please provide adequate reasoning for your review. Thanks. Suraj T 06:40, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. Awaiting your response in the review page. Suraj T 07:21, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Since I have not got a response from you, I am going to renominate Pale Blue Dot. Suraj T 03:57, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Yeah! sure. I was busy for a while so I couldn't respond to you in proper time.Hope you understand.Regards.RohG ??· 12:51, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
No problem. Suraj T 03:51, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Anna Hazare

Hello! Your submission of Anna Hazare at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --Redtigerxyz Talk 16:20, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 August 2011

A barnstar for you!

The Writer's Barnstar
thanks for the tips and leaving me a message

kookycat101 Kookycat101 (talk) 12:25, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 August 2011

Hello.

I have no idea why you reverted my edit on the page Hong Kong. You said my revert was unexplained, but then HkCaGu's revert was also unexplained, so why didn't you revert his edit but you reverted mine? -- 7D HMS (talk) 07:33, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Yeah!! Your revert was unexplained so, I have reverted yours. your revert/ addition of data to the article was not constructive and HkCaGu reverted your edit because of your unexplained data entry and which has no source ,the data which you recorded was already exits.thank you..RohG ??· 07:49, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for your reply. Why do you think my edit to the article is not constructive? The infobox can be regarded as a summary of the article, but by solely looking at the infobox, you won't know that Hong Kong is part of the Chinese territory (just suppose you know nothing about Hong Kong), so I was just trying to improve the article by adding such information. -- 7D HMS (talk) 07:54, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
You can watch at the Info Box Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China and I've reverted your edit here RohG ??· 08:01, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
I have already stopped editing that page after reading your message at 08:01, 1 September 2011, so why did you report me to an administrator? I have been contributing to Wikipedia constructively since the beginning, and I hope you can discuss with me on issues that you do not agree with me instead of reporting me. -- 7D HMS (talk) 08:13, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Gosh!! I've not reported.. asked about my revert is constructive or not.. yeah you are absolutely correct.. Mistakes can be easily overcome by talk.. RohG ??· 08:20, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

So, I forgot to do that..

I will do that next time. Now go back and add my edits back because I was updating his situation. Ok? Thanks Georgia Peachez (talk) 16:49, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Hello!!!

Hi, this is Jobin, a new wikipedia user. I came to understand that you have an interest in Computer and related topics. I am working on a few articles related to Programming in C. Therefore, I kindly request you to help me on these topics

You may also drop your valuable suggestions on other related articles on my talk page. Jobin RV (talkcontribs) 11:47, 4 September 2011 (UTC)Jobin RV 14:12, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 September 2011

The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 18:37, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 September 2011

EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review

This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 16 September 2011 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding <!--noautoarchive--> to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT 17:22, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 September 2011

The Signpost: 26 September 2011


The Signpost: 3 October 2011

The Signpost: 10 October 2011

Invitation to join the January 2012 Move to Commons Drive

You got this message since you added yourself to the last time or is a member that stated yourself for moving files or related help. If you do not want notification for a future drive, please add yourself to this list.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Images and Media at 00:05, 15 October 2011 (UTC).

Joining of the next MtC drive

Thanks for joining the next MtC drive! I noticed that you forgot to put yourself on the logs page. Please do it, since the reviewers won't check the non-logged files. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) talk
Contribs
 • 10:54, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Yeah!! it's done!

The Signpost: 17 October 2011