User talk:Dragonbooster4

HIII

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dragonbooster4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This account is not a sock puppet - the IP is a sock as this is a dynamic IP - provide a username for THIS IP - which u could recognize as not a sock puppet - what if the other sock puppet editors, edit with different username again??? and what about sleepers - who attack pages created by me

Decline reason:

Checkuser confirmed sockpuppet. Closedmouth (talk) 14:18, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Dragonbooster4 (talk) 14:11, 1 September 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

Nomination of GVK Biosciences for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GVK Biosciences is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GVK Biosciences until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. UseTheCommandLine (talk) 13:04, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]