User talk:Leasnam

Welcome!

Hello, Leasnam, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Hyacinth (talk) 07:36, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake

Hi Leasnam! I thought you were teasing your friend steven and vandalizing wikipedia, but I now see my mistake. I'm really sorry. Lova Falk talk 06:16, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Color, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. If "Blee" is often used to mean "Color", it should be easy to find a reliable source for this. Old Moonraker (talk) 07:39, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You can use any dictionary. Here are a few cites: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Blee ; http://www.wordnik.com/words/blee ; http://onlinedictionary.datasegment.com/word/blee Leasnam (talk) 14:17, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a reference to the page. Leasnam (talk) 14:22, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OOPS!

I had 65 and thought I'd changed it to 66.

EoGuy (talk) 18:27, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Leasnam. You have new messages at Schuhpuppe's talk page.
Message added 22:08, 14 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Byword

My edits were intended to be helpful, whether you agree or not. Most of the uses of "byword" that I have found are Biblical. Those uses are generally NOT about true proverbs. Rather, those uses are about being a standard of comparison, the butt of insults, etc. The Hebrew word "mashal" is not always best translated as "proverb", it has a variety of meanings. Maybe "byword" is actually in use today in Britain, but it's not part of American usage. I will leave it to your judgement. Pete unseth (talk) 12:11, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to English language. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 22:41, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. The source I have (it's a book titled History of the English Language), but I did alter the supporting info for the Old English synonyms. The book lists synonyms for the word astrologer; I changed it to honest and looked them up in an OE dictionary. I will re-add with the synonyms as given in the book, and also cite it. Leasnam (talk) 23:11, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think that'll work. - BilCat (talk) 23:22, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Leasnam!

I just register this account! And I was testing to edit, for the first time! I edited "granted", just added an example: "Granted, that officers were used to making decisions, they still couldn't be expected to understand." I found this example in the Oxford dic, just forgot to delete the Chinese translation part when I pasted. why do you see it's destructive edition?

I didn't delete any thing original, just adding more info, forgetint to remove the foreign language is my bad, but I think you should not block a new user just because this small lapse!

It will be very appreciated if you can unblock me! Thank you! =） — Preceding unsigned comment added by Longchina (talk • contribs) 22:36, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! That was on Wiktionary. Yes, I saw where the edit was good, except for the Chinese translation, which for me only shows up as squares. This is what I deemed destructive. The block was only temporary. I usually only block for an hour, or a day, in which case you should be good to go. I appreciate the explanation. Sometimes we sysops have to decipher what's being done with limited info, and we sometimes get it wrong. Apologies for that :) Leasnam (talk) 20:57, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, no problem! =）Be4 that, I never know that there are Wikipedia administrators; I heard that most of you are volunteers! What a big happy family!!! =D — Preceding unsigned comment added by Longchina (talk • contribs) 23:44, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Farm (revenue commutation), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. Roh^G??· 03:25, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How has it conflicted with neutrality? It is a mirror image of the etymology found at Farm. Also, the etymology is well referenced. Leasnam (talk) 03:27, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relative clauses

Your mistake is a common one, and due to misdentifying the antecedent of the relative clause. From [[1]]:

1. Be careful with relative pronouns who, which and that. Look to see which known the relative pronoun is standing in for, and make your verb appropriately singular or plural to match it.

Ladies who lunch on Tuesdays eat egg drop soup.

A lady who lunches on Tuesday eats egg drop soup.

Bob is one of the men who eat tortilla chips before dinner.

Bob is one man who eats tortilla chips before dinner.

In this example we see that Bob is part of the men, “one of the men,” and “who” is referring to that group of men, not just Bob. This is tricky, but you’ll get it!

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

Hi. When you recently edited English plural, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Browne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Leasnam. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Leasnam. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Leasnam. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]