User talk:SugarRat

Archives

Tagging of Rebecca Brown (vlogger)

Hi Randor1980. I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Rebecca Brown (vlogger). Rebecca Brown (vlogger) was tagged too quickly to fit the speedy deletion criteria because (per our WP:CSD guideline) "Contributors sometimes create pages over several edits, so administrators should avoid deleting a page that appears incomplete too soon after its creation." Please give adequate time (usually at least 10 minutes) before tagging a new page in those cases that are not clear vandalism or copyright violation.. I request that you consider not re-tagging Rebecca Brown (vlogger) for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. Thanks — CactusWriter ^(talk) 20:39, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Party shading/Republican Party of the Social Order

Unless I missed something, that looks to be a part of Category:Brazil political party colour templates and that whole scheme. I just can't figure out if it's duplicative to Template:Party shading/Republican Party of the Social Order, was that your concern? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 00:36, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please put a new picture on Phillip Hughes' page

Please put a new picture on Phillip Hughes' page — Preceding unsigned comment added by WPHJ2001 (talk • contribs) 01:30, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why? What's wrong with the current photo? Randor1980 – t c 01:38, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I Swear To God Just Let Me Make An Account

I replaced your speedy notice on User talk:I Swear To God Just Let Me Make An Account with a db-multiple notice to document the obvious copyvio issue too. Meters (talk) 23:33, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bishop's Novak death

Dear Randor1980, Bishop Novak died in December 4. See:http://www.a12.com/redentoristas/noticias/detalhes/morre-aos-84-anos-o-missionario-redentorista-dom-alfredo-novak, http://www.catholic-hierarchy.org/bishop/bnovak.html, http://diocesejacarezinho.org/site/2014/12/falece-dom-alfredo-novak-bispo-emerito-de-paranagua-pr/

Sincerely, --Noel baran (talk) 11:23, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 3 or December 4? I can't read the Portuguese news articles, but catholic-hierarchy.org says he died on the 3rd. Regards, Randor1980 – t c 11:37, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse, Yes, in December 3. It's my mistake. But not in November:))--Noel baran (talk) 16:40, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Altered speedy deletion rationale: Dr Anju Prajapati Maharjan

Hello Randor1980. I am just letting you know that I deleted Dr Anju Prajapati Maharjan, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 14:59, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

If a PROD has been removed, you are not allowed to add it again, if it has been redirected to any other article by other editor, you can either write a new article or redirect elsewhere. You cannot restore the removed content only because you want it to be deleted. There is some coverage[1] so you can keep it as a redirect, that may stop the recreation. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 11:13, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Now you have tagged it under R3 without even reading about the deletion criteria, it is not for the "articles and stubs that have been converted into redirects". OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 11:40, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indianmoney has been deleted under WP:R3. Randor1980 – t c 11:44, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's good. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 11:46, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dame Thea Muldoon

Hi SugarRat - I have undone the change you made here. As it states in WP:NOTINHERITED, Note, however, that this does not apply to situations where the fact of having a relationship to another person inherently defines a public position that is notable in its own right, such as a national First Lady or membership of a Royal house. Reference to Dame Thea as the widow of a former Prime Minister of New Zealand is therefore acceptable, as she was the nation's former First Lady. Grutness...wha? 00:06, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andreas Lubitz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andreas Lubitz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andreas Lubitz (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mdann52 (talk) 17:06, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andreas Lubitz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andreas Lubitz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andreas Lubitz (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ― Padenton|✉ 01:59, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Max Greger in Wikipedia Deaths 2015

Greetings ....

Just a thank-you for leaving in my English-Language reference source for Max Greger's passing on the Wikipedia Deaths page. I did not want offend anyone by taking out the German source, so I left it in. As you probably saw, the English source is more detailed and informative. Of course, any non-English speaking folks could use Google Translate or something like it to convert the English text into their own native language.

Thanx-A-Lot, Frank Fgf2007 (talk) 05:06, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Month articles

Per Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Years#Using archives of Portal:Current events for month articles, you should stop forming new month articles at the beginning of each month. The action will instead be done by a bot; see Wikipedia:Bot requests#Month articles. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 02:54, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AAA`

thanks for reverting vandalism, appreciate that, I have just given user:YouWantTheJoJ but is continuing to vandalize so I am now going to report user to Admin. Best Regards.Hot Pork Pie (talk) 14:19, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014 deaths listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect February 2014 deaths. Since you had some involvement with the February 2014 deaths redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Neve –selbert 18:23, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014 deaths listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect January 2014 deaths. Since you had some involvement with the January 2014 deaths redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Neve –selbert 18:24, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notifying authors of speedy deletion tagged articles

Please make sure you notify the authors of the articles that you tag for speedy deletion. I notice that you are using Twinkle to tag articles. It has a built-in notification option. Please either enable it or manually notify the article authors. Thanks. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:44, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding the ref to Gita Hall on Deaths in 2016

Thanks for doing that - this is the second time that the "Deaths in 2016" page has frozen on me; whenever I click on "cite" the page becomes unresponsive! I was hoping to come back in an hour or so and try again to enter the citation. Thanks for doing it. MurielMary (talk) 10:46, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, SugarRat. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion of my edit to deaths in 2017

My understanding is that you reverted on the grounds that there is no article for the individual that has died. I wasn't aware that this is a rule. It would be helpful if you could quote the wikipedia ruling that governs an action that you take like that, for the benefit of people like me. Otherwise your action might look a trifle arbitrary. Thanks. SewerCat (talk) 15:26, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use in Australia discussion

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:09, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

award // Now he’s dead.

		Death Star
		He thought a book would stop a bullet and make him a YouTube star?

Sure people will in time forget about him like Reeva Steenkamp once the news coverage simmers down; e.g. CNN.com --Ruiz in peace (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:49, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, SugarRat. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Moving of Deaths pages, as in "previous months"

Hi. "The seventh day" (moving day for the old month on the seventh day of the new month) begins much earlier in the USA than in Europe and many other parts of the world due to obvious time differences. Those living in the USA are perfectly entitled to move the data way earlier than seems correct to those people living in Europe and other parts of the world. I suspect they are some 14 hours ahead of yourself in that respect. Thanks. Ref ^(chew)(do) 06:43, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Sorry for accidental rollback ... fat fingers! Regards, WWGB (talk) 09:31, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Halema'uma'u Crater

I'm still not sure what your issue is with tagging an article about something affected by an ongoing volcanic eruption as needing to be updated. But if in your view there's a more appropriate template, how about substituting that one instead of simply deleting the "needs to be updated" one I used? The section I tagged IS out of date, after all. Cheers, Awien (talk) 16:45, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The current event template is intended for breaking-news articles being edited by many and is usually removed once heavy editing has subsided. Halemaumau Crater had remained unedited for six days prior to this edit. If you wish to indicate an article or section is outdated you may tag it with {{update}} or {{update|section}}. Regards, SugarRat – t c 08:55, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, SugarRat. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Simon Fieschi" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Simon Fieschi and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 3#Simon Fieschi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 23:22, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deaths in 2024

That English non-paywalled source did not appear in searches at the time I reverted from the Washington Post to the Mexican one. But thanks for finding one and adding it. Ref ^(chew)(do) 11:37, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for David Graham (actor)

On 27 September 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article David Graham (actor), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Floquenbeam (talk) 22:05, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]