Jump to content

User talk:QuartierLatin1968/Archive2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

hi sorry I am probably doing this wrong but for your edit of Temple of Baal - I was there 4 years ago and have a number of pictures you may post if you wish. Especially now that it is gone. Please feel free to contact me at Flickr.com user Craig Jenkins. If you want to see them go to my album Lebanon &Syria 2011

Décoration

[edit]
QuartierLatin1968 is hereby awarded this Barnstar as late recognition for all his brilliant contributions to Wikipedia.

!מזל טוב

from Izehar

Bonjour Monsieur, est-ce que vous êtes Francophile aussi? Je voudrais vous attribuer cette décoration pour vos contributions merveilleuses à Wikipédia. Izehar 16:58, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

UNMIK

[edit]

You're an experienced user and maybe don't need this, but anyway. I mostly agree with your edits on UNMIK, but could you in future, when switching places of paragraphs and sections, switch them in one edit, and then edit them in another edit? This is because when switching places diffs could hardly be seen, and this could be frustrating, especially if an article could be expected to be a target of POVing. Nikola 10:14, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ituri image

[edit]

It's been a long time since I've been as happy to see an image as I was to see Image:Région Ituri République démocratique du Congo.png. I've already put it on four other articles. Thanks for making it. Cheers, BanyanTree 00:06, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings

[edit]

Greetings on India’s 57th Republic Day. --Bhadani 08:23, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kurów

[edit]

Could you please write a stub http://kw.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kur%C3%B3w - just a few sentences based on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kur%C3%B3w ? Only 2 -5 sentences enough. Please. Pietras1988 TALK 10:53, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanx for excellent article. If on pl wiki isn't yet article about your city I can translating him from en wiki. Pietras1988 TALK 08:09, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Quebec

[edit]

Hi QuartierLatin, Just as a matter of interest, what's your basic stance on the issue of Quebec independance? Are you for it or against it? (I'm honestly not looking to get into an argument - just interested!) Brian 12:15, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously the question is very complex. Québec is a nation, and independence is an option that belongs to it by right. On the other hand, I think it would be unwise for the Québécois to try to establish an independent state on the basis of a 51% yes vote. The real contest will be for the allegiance of the enfants du loi 101 – once they can be won to the notion that Québec, not Canada, is their nation, then the battle's won. For selfish reasons, I also like Québec in Confederation because they're a good example to the rest of the country. Canada has built its unique social model in part thanks to the influence of Québec labour unions, student groups, feminists, and so on. (In the event of sovereignty, I do think that Nunavik and perhaps James Bay should have the option of becoming a new Canadian territory, should they so desire.) But to answer your question more directly, if I were a Québécois and I were voting in the next referendum on sovereignty, I would vote yes. QuartierLatin1968 El bien mas preciado es la libertad 16:07, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll admit for reasons that will become clear that my question was a slightly loaded one, although I have to absolutely stress that I'm not looking to get into a debate, and nomatter what your answer to this second question may be, I'll not respond in anyway other than to thank you for answering! - I just want to give food for thought, as is the nature of encyclopedias! I noticed on your Userpage that you say you're an Irish Republican. If Quebec is distinct from the rest of Canada and therefore a plausible candidate for independence, why would you want to lump Northern Ireland (with its own distinct culture and history) in with the Republic of Ireland? Would you not prefer to advocate self-determination rather than Republicanism? Brian 18:12, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aha! All becomes clear. :-) You're right, Northern Ireland (and in particular, the northeast of Ireland) is culturally quite different from the South. Indeed, I can see an argument for believing the "British" community of Northern Ireland to be a distinct 'Protestant Irish nation'. But remember that if there is a 'Protestant Irish nation', these are nations living side by side, in every county and town of Northern Ireland. You cannot separate them; no line of partition would satisfy. The current border's a mess: why is Derry cut off from Donegal, a clear part of its natural hinterland? why is Newry in NI? why are Monaghan and Armagh in different countries? But you can't split the difference either; the result would be equally vexing.
So there's an overarching need for Orange/Green reconciliation, first and foremost. You cannot build a United Ireland on the basis of support from only one community, any more than it has been possible to build a United Kingdom on the basis of only one community. This is why the Good Friday Agreement is essential: it creates a different dynamic from the "either Dublin or London" mentality and challenges people of both communities to imagine themselves with common institutions and symbols. And this is why the process has stalled: faced with that challenge, both Unionists and Republicans have balked, held back, delayed, tried to hang on to their old fiefs and shibboleths. But that process must go on, sacred cows notwithstanding, because the Union won't work without reconciliation and neither will a United Ireland.
There's also the fact tacitly admitted by everybody, at least in unguarded moments, that the 'Protestant Irish nation' or (as it self-identifies) the British community is rooted in Ireland. This is what's unique and special about the Ulster British: their roots are in Scotland and England but they've developed their own definite community characteristics on the soil of Ireland. And as an outsider looking in (I'm a North American of [Northern] Irish descent), it amazes me how much is strikingly similar about both sides – how much is Irish, if you like, in the British community; how much is Scottish in the local Irish community, and so on. Tim Collins makes a similar point about the experience of Irish soldiers (from North and South) serving together overseas.
I don't get that feeling much about Québec. You can't set foot in that country without feeling yourself to be in a very different place from English Canada – a nation all its own. Its literature, cinema, cuisine, music – everything is just so distinct. I love it, but it's not mine. As Duceppe always says of Québec, ni supérieur ni inférieur mais différent. It's a different scenario from Ireland.
So I do support the principle of consent, as do practically all Irish Republicans nowadays. Cross-community reconciliation is the sine qua non – but at the end of the day, I think that people across the island will recognize that more unites them than divides them. (But I also think Ireland has much more in common with Scotland, and other parts of Britain, than is typically admitted in nationalist circles.) QuartierLatin1968 El bien mas preciado es la libertad 18:49, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well I have to say that I am definately impressed! For someone not from the province you certainly have a clear grasp of the situation here. I really appreciate your taking the time to answer, and so thoroughly too! Just one point of clarification I would make, though! The vast majority (myself being in the minority) of the Protestants that I know would not classify themselves as Irish because they identify that word with Irish Republicanism and ofcourse the Republic of Ireland. Even the term Northern Irish isn't often heard, which means that most people simply identify themselves as British. (Even the logical halfway house British Irish doesn't get heard!) I wonder what they'd call themselves if the United Kingdom were to dissolve?! Anyway, cheers for that input, dude! Slán leat, Brian 19:51, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks, man! It's great to have confirmation from somebody that I'm not totally off my nut! :-) Well, what can I say, I listen to Talk Back. Thank heaven for the BBC in bringing the world together! (You know, your government ought to tax us foreigners; they're providing a brilliant service to us for free.) But yeah – thanks for listening to my thoughts with patience and an open mind. QuartierLatin1968 El bien mas preciado es la libertad 21:35, 1 February 2006 (UTC) (I wonder if Hiberno-British would ever catch on? Britanno-Ultonian?)[reply]

Constitutional staus

[edit]

God no - that's why I put it up. If I was going to clean it up, then I would just get on with it. If you think the article's OK, then remove the tag - that article just seemed more like an essay than an encyclopaedia article to me. --Latinus (talk (el:)) 20:22, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revolutionary Voting

[edit]

Bonjour Q, I've given my vote for what it's worth. I just hope there's enough traffic to that article to warrant this quarrel! On a different note, do athiests say adieu?! Brian 22:25, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Brian, thanks for voting! Haha, do I come off as too emotional about this? Isn't it funny how Wikipedia brings out the petty side in all of us? What happened was, I moved this page to Prachanda after giving it some thought, and about an instant later TJive reverts me. And I think to myself, what on earth is going on here? So we argue on each other's talk pages for awhile and I end up giving up in the name of keeping the peace. I wouldn't have revisited the matter if this other guy, DanielM hadn't come along saying he agreed with what had been my position. But it's true, more effort has been expended in thinking about where this article should be, than what should go in it. Sad, sad. QuartierLatin1968 El bien mas preciado es la libertad 22:47, 4 February 2006 (UTC) PS: Adieu is but the tip of the iceberg. Our own "goodbye" is supposed to come from "God be wi' ye". So God can't really be purged from ordinary conversation.[reply]
Why supposedly?! It's derived from "God by ye" (with the meaning of, as you rightly say, God be with you). And the Irish for "hello" is día duit (pronounced "jee-a ditch"), which means "God to you", so it looks like He's really got a monopoly in the greetings business! Brian 22:58, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hebrides map

[edit]

Hello Quartier and thank you for the star! Some users here have actually not been afraid to say how dreadful my maps are; so it's nice to have some recognition. Thanks!

I like your one-legged cat, by the way.Kelisi 21:26, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Check out the devanagari on Heart Sutra. Is that what you wanted? deeptrivia (talk) 21:45, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour!!! Hey, I was just reading the Heart Sutra page, I believe there's something wrong with the transliteration of this sentence:

पारसंगते Pārasamgate [pɑːɾəsəm gəteː] Completely gone beyond

If I recall my sanskrit classes correctly, the anusvāra over letter "sa" is not supposed to be pronounced as a full "m", but rather as a nasalized one, much in the way the "n" is pronounced in French "painture". So, in Latin script that "m" should have a dot over it to show it is a "cerebral" consonant, and in IPA I've seen examples when this kind of sounds are written with a tilde: ã

Au revoir! (addendum: sorry, forgot to sing :) TrollDeBatalla )

You could be right. But in Hindi, at least, the nasal vowel is indicated with a candrabindu, not an anusvāra. If you're right about the Sanskrit, though, the IPA would indeed be ə̃. QuartierLatin1968 El bien mas preciado es la libertad 16:51, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Celtic Europe

[edit]

I sure know the criterion of the Celtic League, etc. but it does not just satisfy many people in Europe :) Can you please bother yourself to make a brief research about the Celticity claim of Friuli. I thought the user who produced those dreadful maps was a Friulian Celtophile but he came out to be Dutch. On the other hand, there is a related discussion on the article Europe. Perhaps you may get interested. Best Regards...Behemoth 00:18, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How Owen

[edit]

Socialist, pro-choice, AND support of same-sex marriage...they raise ya'all right up yonder in Canada. I've almost finished stubs for all of the European countries on Cornish Wikipedia --Caponer 01:35, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Burnt Church First Nation site

[edit]

Thank you for your initial work on the entry for Burnt Church First Nation! I go out there frequently and even look forward to living out that way soon. I was wondering if you would mind if I returned your reference to Burnt Church being near New Jersey as opposed to your Neguac reference - New Jersey is more correct, actually. I would like to add much to the site and feel I could be a real help there. I would even employ some of my friends there to make sure I get things right. I have made much use of Wikipedia and now I guess I have a place to give back some. Obviously, I am a newbie to boot, so thank you for your patience with my inquiry. -- Esgenoopetitj 05:13, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

C'est bon! We'll have to stay in touch. God willing I'll be living out there someday soon. 'Tis a different land on the bluffs of the Miramichi Bay and I have seen pics from my Aunt that Nova Scotia seems to be similar in geography. But man! do I love it out there! I'm here in Michigan-land, 700+ ft. above sea level on the freshwater Great Lakes. There is something different about sea level and salt water! (I was brought up in Aylmer, Ontario and my father's family is from Searchmont, Ontario and "the Soo" - Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, hence, this Canadian connection.) Do you have an interest in First Nations people? Or how did you start out to setting up the Maritime First Nations lists?

And thanks for the idea of how to sign my talk edits (I'll have to work out the form yet). I'll keep learning, and be a good Wikipedian! I won't mind critique and tutorial along the way. Merci !!! -- Esgenoopetitj 17:32, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BR and VE macro-regions

[edit]

Hello QL, hope you are well. Just wanted to give you my thumbs up for those maps and fixings you've done for the articles on Brazilian and Venezuelan economic/statistical regions. Keep those good ones coming. ;v] //Big Adamsky 20:49, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Native Cornish

[edit]
yes it is for me. i still feel that you are applying an excessively limited concept of the term "native" (reradless of whether it afects Ken George or not, which, I believe, is neither here nor there). you seem to assume that "nativeness" is based on where a person happens to be born, part of the ius solis tradition. other criteria also exist in law, however, such as ius sanguis, so that, for example, third generation galizans are considered galizan to all efects and purposes by the administration whether or not either they, or indeed eitheir of their parents, were actually born in galiza (as is the case, in fact, for several hundred thoudans of people). may i also suggest that, for example, someone born in india but who has spent all of their life, or the best part of it, living and working in cornall and especially for the advancement of cornall would certainly, to my mind at least, be worthy of the title "native of cornwall". this is rather an open concept and need not be applied based on the narrowest interpretaion available, ie. where someone happens to be born. if that needs to be done, ie. sorting poeple based on their place of birth, may i suggest changing the name of the category to the rather simpler and less controversial "people born in cornwall"? Neal [1]
It's a pity you endorse split infinitives and preposition endings in sentences though :( My biggest bother (besides the Americanisation of the New Zealand dialect and accent) is the use of the singular to reflect plural, such as "there's lots of cats". What's 'heteroflexible'? Enzedbrit 07:34, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Enzedbrit, that last seems to me to be totally unrelated to the issue. But if you think those are problems, reword them so that they're more pleasing to you. However, QuartierLatin's grammatical preferences are of no relevance to the validity of his edits...especially comments about his user page. Those are best kept to his user talk page. That criticism aside, I'm glad we were able to resolve the map issue for now. Way to go, Quartier. -GlamdringCookies 18:29, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, no offence was taken; although I agree, these comments probably are more at home here on my talk page than on talk:Celtic nations. QuartierLatin1968 El bien mas preciado es la libertad 03:52, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question

[edit]

I was wondering, how come you speak Cymreag and Cornish,I wouldn't have thought that these languages to be used in Canada?--Rhydd Meddwl 20:24, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hindu calendar eras

[edit]

I have added the other calendar to Template:Different calendars as you suggested and I have put them on the years 2000-2050. Philip Stevens 10:26, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Welsh Mythology

[edit]

Thanks for splitting up Lir and Llyr. That has been on my list for a while. Also, I absolutely love Llwyd ap Cil Coed. Da iawn! --Straif 18:57, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Celtic mythology

[edit]

Nice cleanup job on Celtic mythology. --Nantonos 21:40, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Guises of The Morrigan AfD

[edit]

Hi, how do we determine notability for a book? Google search results of 193 for this book. Is that a sufficient grounds for voting NN? Thanks,  :) Dlohcierekim 17:07, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and thanks for the links. :) Dlohcierekim 19:49, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I removed one line about ethnic clash between Pashtuns and Muhajir which was ethnic and not sectarian clash that occurred in 1980. The comment about bearded motorcycle attackers is picks one group while many people with different clothes have attacked while trying to blame other groups. Siddiqui 20:25, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why POV? (Keltik)

[edit]

Because to use reclaimed assumes that it was faithfully reacreating something that had before existed. That may be what they thought they were doing but it is arguable that it was not reclamation but invention. I am not likely to revert should you prefer your origional wording.Dejvid 12:17, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question

[edit]

Hi, you contribute very well to Wikipedia. But as I was looking for a Gaulish God named Ivaros (Ivaos), I didn't find him. I'd like to have some information about him, where can I search? Thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bmarnice (talkcontribs) .

Respect

[edit]

Hey QuartierLatin, I just wanted to say that I love all the work you've been doing on the Celtic nations page and perhaps (I forget, they blur together in my memory of my watchlist) Modern Celts too. Just wanted to request, though, that you are a little more respectful to people's submissions. For example, today there was the post that you essentially reverted (appropriately, for sure) and cited some of its content as "rubbish". While respect isn't on the rules for talk pages, being polite is included in the etiquette page. I repeat, I have never disagreed with your altering of the Celtic nations page, but it would be great if you could be just a bit more respectful. I'm sure that you assume good faith, but just keep in mind that being too harsh with people's submissions can hurt their feelings (even if they are unregistered). Keep up the wonderful editing, -GlamdringCookies 21:51, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

signature

[edit]

Would you consider removing the flag image from your signature? The signature guideline is strongly against it, as being distracting, vulnerable to vandalism, and an unnecessary load on the servers. Of course there's no reason to go back and re-edit old talk pages, but if you would consider going forth with a streamlined signature, I'm sure many would appreciate it, including myself. -- nae'blis (talk) 01:39, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Images on such templates are really better off reduced. They are not the "stars" of the template. Did you notice that the resizing you did is throwing off the title of the template? It's not centralized and unevenly distributed in the header. I settled on 25px because (a) it doesn't disturb the template's title, and (b) it is a [deliberately] minimal size that will maintain the image visible enough, but without causing those problems I mentioned in my previous edit. I'm no genius in wiki code, but I figure we can only keep the new size if the problem with it throwing off the header can be solved somehow. If you can do that, ok, but if not, we'll have to go back to the previous size, since, as I said, images are really secondary in the template, and we can only use them if, and to the extension where, they don't disturb the template itself (layout included).
Furthermore, I noticed you replaced the image. As far as I can tell, it seems to be the exact same image only in PNG format. But in case I missed something, and the images are not exactly the same, the previous one was a result of a debate about the historical accuracy of the image to be in the template, since the image that used to be there wasn't completely accurate regarding the colors used in the Royal Family's crest. Regards, Redux 02:37, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's no problem at all. We are all working to improve the project. Your adaptation seems to work. It's not really important which side of the template the image is on. And you are in fact right about the PNG format being preferred over JPG. As I said, we would only go back to the previous format if the PNG image were not identical to the JPG file, due to the historical accuracy issue. I squinted some, and it seems that the images are identical, which would mean that the PNG image should stay. Perhaps you can confirm my "diagnosis", by comparing the two images. As a matter of fact, I will delete the JPG file from our servers for being a duplicate file of the [preferred] PNG image, but I'd like to be completely positive about that, since image deletion is the one Administrative action that is not reversible through the software (someone would need to re-upload the image if we were to need it again for any reason). Cheers, Redux 17:18, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cwestiynnau

[edit]

Hi, I have some questions about Commons:Image:Siaradwyr y Gymraeg ym Mhrif Ardaloedd Cymru.png.

  1. What is the source of the data?
  2. Are there no counties in Wales with between 37.5% and 50% Welsh speakers?

Thanks! User:Angr 10:27, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your Fabulous Boites!

[edit]

Are these only yours? I am attempting to steal some of them, but will stop if asked. --Kathryn NicDhàna 04:24, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Celtic europe.PNG listed for deletion

[edit]
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Celtic europe.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Angr 12:03, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

en.wiktionary says hello

[edit]

Hi, thanks for the transwiki, if you have a lot that needs to be transwikied, it may be easier for you to simply make a list and post it on an admin's (mine works) talk page over there, and we can import it. That is a 1-step solution to what is presently a 5 step process, and hopefully makes it easier for everyone. - TheDaveRoss 05:13, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Lamiae

[edit]

firstly, let me say that you're right to question the source of that. after writing it, to be fair, i started questioning it, since it wasn't so glossed by Romans, but by Irish monks commenting on Latin texts.

the very first instance of the word "morrigan" in an Irish text is in "manuscript Regina No. 215 in a gloss of Isaiah 34.14, a passage which recounts the desolation of Edom. Lamia is there glossed monstrum in femine figura .i. morigain ‘monster in female form, that is, a morrígan’ (Stokes and Strachan 1901: I.2.6). The codex was written in 876 or 877 A.D.." (as cited in Angelique Gulermovich Epstein, War Goddess electronic edition (1998), Chapter One "The Morrígan in Mythological Tradition", page 2). Epstein goes on to document a number of other instances in which "Lamia" or "Lamiae" is glossed as "Morrígan" or vice versa.

also, apparently i forgot to include the signature, so i'll do that now: Whateley23 11:53, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rum

[edit]
  • Not neccessarily, Rumelia is a geographical and historical region, Rum province was an administrative region of the ottoman empire whereas Rum refers to a (more or less) ethnic connotation.. Over the centuries Rum was used to mean peoples of the ancient Byzantine Empire (particularly for Greeks). The ottoman sultan who conquered constantinople titled himself Kaiser-i Rum, meaning the ceasar of the romans.. You can think of the three articles like history of new york, new york state and newyorker.. Baristarim 22:35, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

[edit]

Hi, I have a question for you. I have been trying to get an icon into my signature. I have done everything....I went to my preferances and typed in the icon but the code I typed came up in my signature please help me.... Please let me know how on my talk page, as you can see in my signature the icon is not comming up--Seadog [[Image:Guitarjpeg.jpg|20px]] 20:12, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :)

[edit]

Hi, Thank you so much my signature is up and running.....You were a great help. If you don't mind could you mind telling me the aspects and basic philosophy of Democratic Socialism in laymans terms......I am very interested but have a hard time grasping what it is about since I am new to politcs, Thanks.--Seadog.M.S 23:27, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Thank you for all the informative info, I did not realize that my favorite writer, George Orwell and John Steinbeck (and of course the man Upton Sinclair supported that type of government till now, thank you and have a nice day--Seadog.M.S 01:23, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey again

[edit]

I have a couple questions(again) The people all around me seem to dislike Socialism, They call it communism and bad........My question is this. What is the differance between Communism and Democratic Socialism? Oh yeah, Have you gotten any slack about the icon in your signature, I just changed it yesterday and someone asked me to remove....Why havn't you?--Seadog.M.S 23:39, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

History of Shaivism to History of Saivism

[edit]

This is a naive question to be sure because I have little knowledge of the subject, but shouldn't "History of Shaivism" be changed to "History of Saivism" because "saivism" is used throughout the article? Outlook 14:21, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re Shaivism vs. Saivism

[edit]

Thanks for your response. I understand. My interest is consistency. Again from a naive viewpoint regarding the subject, wouldn't it be more consistent then to spell all instances of "Saivism" as "Shaivism" in view that most readers—I assume, always dangerous to do—can't view the accent? Outlook 16:07, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Erecura statue

[edit]

Hi there, thanks for uploading Image:Stuttgart-bad-cannstatt lapidarium herecura.jpg. However, since anyone could take a free picture in the museum where the statue is kept the image is now listed on WP:CP. Regards, Dr Zak 14:23, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arabs in Turkey

[edit]

Hi! I noticed you made some changes to the Arabs in Turkey article, specifically the part where you changed "Alevi" to "ʿAlawis". I wasn't sure whether the original article was referring to the Alevi or Alawite, as they're different religious groups. Perhaps you know which one? Thanks in advance. —Khoikhoi 23:42, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, I agree with you now, we shouldn't mention any other alternate spellings in the article because it would only confuse readers. Thanks for the explanation. —Khoikhoi 04:29, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, can you please add the names for the following towns in the Arabic script: Samandağ (Suwaidiyyah), Altınözü (Qusair) and Reyhanlı (Rihaniyyah). Thanks. —Khoikhoi 04:32, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, thanks anyways. —Khoikhoi 01:42, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I posted this at the above, but got no responses. In case you or others are not watching that page:

If this template is about Celtic religion now (used to by Celtic Mythology), and we have a category for *ancient* Celtic religion, might it make sense to include a *brief* section on modern Celtic religion? I'd suggest listing Celtic Reconstructionism and possibly modern versions of Celtic Christianity (but I think there have been some conflicts over those articles). However, I think it would only work to include modern religion if it can be kept pretty strictly limited and not include any of the non-Celtic traditions that mistakenly get called "Celtic". Otherwise, it might make sense to change the template back to mythology. Thoughts? --Kathryn NicDhàna 22:47, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

World Cattle Population

[edit]

I know this is a bit out-of-date now, but I just noticed your request for figures at Talk:Cattle#Cattle population, and thought I would share these data: the FAOSTAT[2] world profile gives 1,529,110,000 for Cattle and Buffaloes; other pages of interest are http://dahd.nic.in/stat_files/table_26.htm (1993-2003 statistics for various animals), http://cattle-today.com (estimates 1.3 billion and gives some info on geographic distribution).

Also, hi from somebody up north :-D

--Grey Knight 22:28, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thank you for your 2005-01-21 addition of the external link in K'iche' language to the K'iche'-English dictionary.[3] I work with a group of Guatemalan immigrants here in Ohio, and I was unaware of the modern K'iche'-English dictionary. It will be most useful in bonding with the K'iche' speaking immigrants here. Thank you. r3 14:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Southern Sudan questions

[edit]

Hi, I left a couple of questions at Talk:Southern Sudan; maybe you can help out? Cheers, AxelBoldt 02:05, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Quartier, some major problems have been introduced over at the Boann article. I've made a dent, and flagged it for cleanup, since I might not be able to slog through it soon. The changes were initially reverted, but are back now. Some of the information added may be ok, but some of it is rather problematic in terms of sourcing and accuracy. Other problems are that inherent contradictions and stylistic problems have been introduced. If you don't have a chance to get to it any time soon, I'll do it eventually, but would like another pair of eyes on it. Tapadh Leat, ~ Kathryn NicDhàna 21:29, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ideas on the problem of North India, West India and East India

[edit]

I have good ideas for the resolution of the problem of determination of the N, E, W, Indias and I am also native to the gangetic plains. But I am new to wiki. Can you please tell me how to put up my article for review?

A bientot! Maquahuitl 18:51, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I shall try to come up with reliable references first. Will scrap you once I am done with that. Merci pour votre coopération!

Maquahuitl 19:24, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A long-delayed "huh?"

[edit]

I'd forgotten to bring this up months ago, but my memory got jogged: Can you please explain your edit here, which had the nonsensical edit summary of "Matrona doesn't derive from Matrona, it is Matrona"? I'm guessing that the software must have done something to your edit summary, because I don't think you would have written something that weird. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 15:46, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vangiones

[edit]

Si vales valeo. Multas gratias tibi ago propter astrum horrei. Immo vero recte dicis Wikipediam habere multam hooplam de Celtis. Potestas lapidis nugarum Celticarum non est ignoranda. Salve.Dave 15:32, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gwenn Teir Bronn

[edit]

Sorry about the speedy delete on the talk page - i didn't read the page title properly (it was late at night and i was doing New Page patrolling)

Cornish

[edit]

Hey, I was wondering where you had learnt Cornish. I'm very interested in it; are there any fluent speakers? Thanks, --MosheA 04:39, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I gave a sort of answer to your 'old' question.--Paco 01:02, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:*

[edit]

Template:* has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 21:42, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I want to apologize. That was a real asshole comment and I wish to apologize. I was disappointed that my evidence for arguing that it should be redirected to the bullet template was drying up (despite the fact that the fixes were good for Wikipedia) and I (unwisely and unfounded-ly[?]) took it out on you. I suppose I felt so strongly about my position, that I was going to fight to the death to make sure I got my way (real selfish and immature). I should have assumed good faith and just explained politely about the change in the amount of pages that misused the template. Civility is no "small thing" -- it is one of the five pillars of editing Wikipedia. Hopefully, you'll accept my apology. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and I hope you continue to contribute. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 23:18, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greens (and Blues)

[edit]

Hey there, I responded to your note on Talk:Phocas. Short answer is that "Green" is correct -- check out the talk page for more info. --Jfruh (talk) 22:52, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Language Cleanup

[edit]

Thank you so much for taking this on! Also, if you get a chance to look at French Wikipedia, the Celtic articles are generally in a dire state. My French is good enough to see the dreadful mistakes, but not good enough to write stellar, sourced prose to replace them. In particular, there are pervasive theological errors. The Brighid article says (last time I looked) that Brighid is the Great Mother Goddess, and all other Celtic Goddesses are her avatars/manifestations, or something. Similar approaches have been taken with some of the Gods. I think taking care of these mistakes (which in most cases can be accomplished easily enough by translating from the English language versions we have here) is rather important. Thanks again for all the good work you're doing! Tapadh Leat - Kathryn NicDhàna 00:32, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please keep a close eye on this article just now please. A couple of editors keep on insisting on removing material which does not agree with their viewpoint. --MacRusgail 13:41, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can I repeat this request please. Users Zburh and ?Crococolana seem to be pushing an agenda. --MacRusgail 17:00, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimania 2009

[edit]
Toronto Candidate City for Wikimania 2009
Support TORONTO in its bid to become the host city of WIKIMANIA 2009
The University of Toronto is the planned host site, which I see is your alma-mater!

Visit m:Wikimania 2009/Toronto for TORONTO's MetaWiki page and help build a strong bid.

-- Zanimum 16:12, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In Remembrance...

[edit]
Rememberance Day


--nat Alo! Salut! Sunt eu, un haiduc?!?! 00:12, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology some more

[edit]

If you have a moment, could you check this out: Samhain#Etymology. There are some sources referred to in the text, and some of it is uncontroversial. But for an otherwise well-sourced article, we need improvements there. I'd appreciate your eyes on it. Moran Taing, - Kathryn NicDhàna 05:49, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fótla & Fódla

[edit]

I am VERY surprised that one such as you who is always trawling through the fairy glens of the isle of Gwicipedi has not yet noticed that we have, not one, not a triad but a COUPLE of articles on the earth-fairy, Fodla, one called Fótla, the other Fódla. Why on earth haven't you yet got round to merging them? What on earth have you been up to? Tut Tut!! SexyEnglishGayLad —Preceding comment was added at 02:47, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merged to Fódla. - Kathryn NicDhàna 08:19, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move of Scottish kings

[edit]

There is a proposed move of Scottish kings at Talk:Kenneth I of Scotland that I thought I'd bring to your attention. I think you have had things to say on this subject in the past. Probably won't be successful, but that's wiki for you. Best regards, Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 17:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Erecura

[edit]

Hello Quartier Latin
Well I wanted to talk about the discussion on, Erecura, a Celtic goddess. You wrought something about it quite a while ago. You than mentioned two inscriptions about Erecura in Africa you thought were made bye merchants or soldiers. As I'm Currently working on the topic, I had informations concerning the two inscriptions from Africa. First, that's what they say
1) Terrae Matr[i] / (H){a}erecurae(!) Ma/tri deum Mag/nae Ideae / Popiliae M(arci) f(ilia) / Maxima tauro/bolium aram / posuit movit / fecit
2) Terrae Matr[i] / Eraecurae M[a]/tri Magnae Id[e]/ae P(ublius) Sextilius / C(ai) f(ilius) Quir(ina) Ho/noratus tau/ripolium(!) et creobolium / movit(!) et fecit / aramque po/[suit]

I don't know if you understand Latin, you probably do but, I translated it in French :
1) A la mère de la terre, Herecura. A la grande mère Idéenne des dieux, Popilia Maxima, fille de Marcus a réalisé un taurobole et a posé un autel.
2) A la mère de la terre, Herecura. A la grande mère Idéenne. Publius Sextilius Honoratus, fils de Caius, de la tribu des Quirinia a fait un taurobole et un Criobole, il a posé un autel.

The point is, there is a few things that make me think that the inscriptions were made bye romans living in Africa, not merchants as you said but i could be wrong. First, The name of the woman Popiliae M(arci) f(ilia) / Maxima was found on another inscription in Thibilis, on whom only the name is readable. The second element is the Quirina tribe after the man's name, many on the romans living in Africa were originally from that tribe, under Augustus, claudius, Hadrianus and Antoninus, colonization was organized from the Quirina tribe to Africa. Also, Another inscription From Sigus, Numidia, not that far from Thibilis mentions a Magna Mater priest named "Lucius Clodiux Luci filius Quirina tribu Honoratus" As the other inscription was also refering to Magna Mater, we may think they were from the same family If you have read anything about the fact that it could be merchants that came and made the inscription, plz let me know where.

P.S. : sorry for the mistakes, I am french speaker. You can reply here or on the french wiki

Jerminel (talk) 10:41, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As you said, I have no Idea how Erecura came over from Europe. And I haven't hear of any other inscriptions with both Goddess even in Europe. (I with others, are currently having a Seminar about the inscriptions on Magna Mater all around the roman world and I am to analyze Numidia)
My opinion is that the once who made these inscription could be colons who came from Gaul and came over with their believes. I don't know if we'll ever have the clue...
Jerminel (talk) 17:28, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Euh, i wanted to ask... Where did you read about the inscriptions in Numidia ?
Jerminel (talk) 16:38, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think as in Gaul, the Numids still have some of their own gods but I am not that sure. I'll have a look at a book I know this afternoon at the library but I do think they keep theirs gods and believes. Jerminel (talk) 11:43, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I made an index of the inscriptions on the godess and I do have the text 20 of them. That's all there is atm I think. Donno If you are interested in having it.

Jerminel (talk) 12:42, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Celts WP invite

[edit]
You are invited to participate in WikiProject Celts, a project dedicated to developing and improving articles about Celts.
You may sign up at the project members page.

Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 05:46, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for joining, your knowledge is most welcome here! Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 22:58, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Have we invited
  • Kathryn NicDhàna, yes, no answer yet
  • NantonosAedui, yes, appears inactive since last fall
  • Cuchullain, just did, thanks for the heads up

etc?

Anyone you can think of would be most welcome, and if you want to invite them yourself, please do so. The template we tag with is {{Celts WP invite}}. Thanks! Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 23:37, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Celts as Barbarians?

[edit]

Your thoughts and/or comments are requested here. Thanks. —Aryaman (Enlist!) 14:10, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of democratic socialist parties and organizations

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of democratic socialist parties and organizations, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of democratic socialist parties and organizations. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Soman (talk) 15:57, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Puk.gif

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Puk.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Asenine  17:56, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ken

[edit]

Have a look at the Talk page for Ken George. -- Evertype· 14:40, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ynysow Predennek

[edit]

Did you ever get a chance to look into this? Endrick Shellycoat 14:17, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hoi! I noticed that you reverted the citation style of reference 7 (Ruttenber) from automatic formatting via the "cite-template" to manual formatting. Was there something wrong with the citation? I am asking since I started to fix the reference style in the article. At the moment they use all kinds of style (citation templates, manual formatting, just weblinks,...). To get a uniform look (and because I don't want to think about formatting) my plan was to use cite-templates everywhere. If that's a bad idea, please let me know, so that I don't waste energy on conversion. bamse (talk) 14:05, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review New Netherland

[edit]

Would appreciate to comments on improvements made the the New Netherland article made recently and opinion as to next step to bringing to GA status. Thanks

add me as a friend

[edit]

also a historian. liked David Alpay's acting in Ararat. I studied Turkish and Turkic history.(BlueGroup (talk) 01:52, 13 May 2009 (UTC)).[reply]

Legend for map?

[edit]

Which color in this image represents the Cherokee Oklahoma Tribal Statistical Area? Can you provide a legend for all the colors? Thanks, ++Arx Fortis (talk) 23:17, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. Thank you!. ++Arx Fortis (talk) 15:42, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source for image

[edit]

Hey, which source did you use to make the image: File:Siaradwyr y Gymraeg ym Mhrif Ardaloedd Cymru2a.svg ? - Francis Tyers · 14:23, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have no idea how many times I've been asked this question (and answered it! ☺). The 2001 census, which included relatively detailed questions on the Welsh language in Wales. The numbers are all online; feel free to check them. Cheers, Q·L·1968 15:07, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Argh, sorry! Actually I read the WLB report on "Census 2001: Status of Welsh" and suspected that might be the case. I was just about to add the source to the image, but I see you've already done it :) Thanks! -- Francis Tyers · 21:00, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
PS. This is spam: I see you are fr-3, but br-??, with some help I made a translation system for br-->fr, you can try it online here. It sucks, but if you put in a paragraph or so of text, you should be able to get the general idea. - Francis Tyers · 21:02, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Nicevenn, which you recently tagged as a hoax, for deletion. If you would like to participate in the debate, please comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicevenn. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 08:23, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blast from the past

[edit]

Hey QL, Enaidmawr has asked for my help on Iouga, an article on a supposed Celtic deity. It was created by GeoffMGleadall, who you may remember as having created a lot of dubious articles and etymology sections on Celtic gods in 2005 and 2006. As one who cleared up a lot of this back in the day, your input would be most appreciated. Thanks, --Cúchullain t/c 14:52, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello QL. I am replying to an ancient comment of yours I just found on the Celtic Luxembourg talk page. You wondered whether development could be combined with your article on Treveri. My starting point was to emphasize the fact that the Celts had been very much in evidence in what is now Luxembourg, particularly in the Titelberg area. I see that not only have you covered this in your own interesting article on the Treveri but that you have added a short section on the Treveri in the Luxembourg article. For me, this seems to have solved the problem. Sorry about not getting back to you earlier but I don't watch all my talk pages. -- Ipigott (talk) 11:34, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your proposal

[edit]

The title of the template Former settlements in Turkey has been changed to Ancient settlements in Turkey. Thanks for your proposal. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 07:35, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

[edit]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

  • This permission does not give you any special status or authority
  • Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
  • You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
  • If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 18:49, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Siaradwyr y Gymraeg ym Mhrif Ardaloedd Cymru

[edit]

Hi. I'v just noticed a problem with one of the maps you'v uploaded. Everything is fine with the original PNG map (File:Siaradwyr y Gymraeg ym Mhrif Ardaloedd Cymru.png) but on the SVG version (File:Siaradwyr y Gymraeg ym Mhrif Ardaloedd Cymru2a.svg) the colors ar wrong. Ceredigion should be the same shade as Sir Gaerfyrddin.

Also, since you uploaded those, a more acurat Wales locator map has been made. Would you consider transfering the data to the new map?

Thanks for your time. ~Asarlaí 07:02, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Interlingua wikipedia

[edit]

Could you please write a bit more about the Geography of Spain in its article? I am trying to categorize all the articles related with that and it'll be cool to have a bigger article about it. I'll try to finish with the category of the Spanish municipalities as soon as possible. Could you also correct Odyssea, Iliade and Litteratura espaniol? Thank you vey much for your help. If you don't have time to do it right now, don't worry, just when you'll have a couple of minutes. Thanks again. Chabi

Maps of Hundreds

[edit]

Hi, I've recently been creating articles for the Hundreds of Somerset (accessible via List of hundreds of England and Wales#Somerset or Template:Hundreds of Somerset). I started looking at how other counties had handled this & found you did maps for the Hundreds of Cornwall (back in 2005). I was wondering if you fancied doing similar maps for Somerset, as my map making skills are zero.— Rod talk 09:31, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your input is needed on the SOPA initiative

[edit]

Hi QuartierLatin1968,

You are receiving this message either because you expressed an opinion about the proposed SOPA blackout before full blackout and soft blackout were adequately differentiated, or because you expressed general support without specifying a preference. Please ensure that your voice is heard by clarifying your position accordingly.

Thank you.

Message delivered as per request on ANI. -- The Helpful Bot 16:40, 14 January 2012 (UTC) [reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ulpia Traiana Sarmizegetusa, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nemesis and Silvanus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Proposta per les Illes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Regionalism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hinduism in Western Sahara for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hinduism in Western Sahara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hinduism in Western Sahara until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 06:41, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template: Praenomina

[edit]

Please stop adding this template to all articles about individual praenomina, and deleting the "see also" link back to the main Praenomen article. These articles were carefully written and organized as a group, and have been carefully maintained since that time. Substantial revisions to the entire class should not have been undertaken without any discussion. I also feel that the trichotomy of "common," "less common," and "obscure" misstates the actual relationship of the various praenomina to one another across time and place, with the risk of misleading the reader, and that abbreviations should not be mixed with unabbreviated praenomina. I am willing to discuss a revised version of this template, but think it should be substantially modified before being applied to the entire class of articles. P Aculeius (talk) 06:33, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry we got off to a bumpy start. I'm sure you must know what alarm it provokes to see a dozen or more articles in your watchlist (that you authored) substantially revised at once. Thank you for showing such consideration as you did in the talk page for Caeso. Please continue working on pronunciations if you can do so, but please don't neglect to provide suitable English versions where that would (or might) differ from Latin. I would like to propose a revision for your template tomorrow, when I have more time to consider the possibilities. P Aculeius (talk) 06:48, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Epic Barnstar
The Epic Barnstar is awarded to an editor who makes particularly fine History and Event-related contributions. This award is in recognition of QuartierLatin's creation of Template:Praenomina, and willingness to work with other editors concerned with that subject to improve it, up to and including locating an obscure typographical symbol required to make it accurate and comprehensive! This template is a wonderful addition to the subject! P Aculeius (talk) 13:56, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Postumus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eutropius (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:43, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dingle Distillery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Porterhouse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote "I know that the English Wikipedia tends to interpret WP:UE aggressively; this would make the natural and obvious choice—leaving the name untranslated— less likely to survive.". If you read WP:UE, you should have noticed, that If there are too few reliable English-language sources to constitute an established usage, follow the conventions of the language appropriate to the subject (German for German politicians...). And that's all we need. The arbitrary translations für South Tyrolean parties (by a single user!) have no authorative english sources and actually lead to confusion. If the policy gets applied (agressively), we have to accept the original proper noun and should not try to translate it. Also other Wikipedias (even the one in italian language, which has abundant sources about South Tyrolean politics) do not translate the names (see [4], [5], [6] or [7]).--Sajoch (talk) 14:05, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Salinas Valley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Soledad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jupiter Dolichenus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Decurion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Egyptian Revolution of 2013 for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Egyptian Revolution of 2013 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Egyptian Revolution of 2013 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GreyShark (dibra) 19:38, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Distances

[edit]

Would you care to offer an explanation for reverting my edit regarding distances in Canadian English? We're not really "measuring" when we say that a place is two hours away. "Reckoning" is exactly what we're doing. As for the other part of that edit, it improves the clarity and structure of the sentence. Q·L·1968 16:48, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

People in Canada, despite the fact that official documentation being in L/100kms, use MPG more often than not, and Ontario is not like the prairies, it is more diverse than that, and regional variations occur, what happens in the Ottawa valley, or the Golden Horse Shoe, for example, is not a provincial standard. Reckon does not read very well, and the wording was fine as it was.--Notwillywanka (talk) 01:55, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the explanation. I've heard distances on the road reckoned in hours almost exclusively in the Golden Horseshoe, but you're right that that doesn't prove how things are done in the Ottawa Valley, or, for that matter, up north. I have noticed that the Canadian English article seems a bit unbalanced towards the Prairies at the moment, however. In the future, perhaps, the article can be expanded with more examples and citations from Ontario, BC, and especially the Maritimes and Newfoundland, whose own linguistic diversity may be worth particular attention. (I still think that "reckon" is the right word for that circumstance, but it's not worth feuding over.) Q·L·1968 17:09, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Claudian letters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Psi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adminship on Kernewek Wikipedia

[edit]

Hi, please see [8]. --MF-W 22:23, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Matres and Matronae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fates (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Veles (god), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tarhun (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ritual of oak and mistletoe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Velleda. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Seattle Saracens, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dai Davies. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Legio XXII Primigenia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eutropius. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Answer the message I

[edit]

have for youToweringpeaks3 (talk) 05:29, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Discussion relevant to the article Isidro A. T. Savillo should take place on the associated talk page. That way there's a record of it other users can follow. (I try to keep conversations on user talk pages to a minimum.) Q·L·1968 15:27, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Triveneto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kingdom of Commagene, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingdom of Armenia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grannus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sarmizegetusa. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited El (deity), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Megiddo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Faustina the Elder, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oriens. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Québec solidaire (logo).png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Québec solidaire (logo).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:59, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Totally fine if it's removed. The file's from 2006, and the QS logo has subsequently changed (different colour scheme). Q·L·1968 15:22, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Sapinuwa edits

[edit]

Hi. I'm the guy who started the Sapinuwa page, breaking it off from Ortakoy in 2006. At the time I was a newbie who didn't know how to use the cite tag, if it even existed then. That is why so many of the references were were nonstandard. I do appreciate your hard work in cleaning it all up. --Zimriel (talk) 21:06, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That was quick. It has been semi-protected for another 30 days. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:57, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon: Thanks so much for your vote of confidence. It means a lot to me since I'm often editing articles in fields like ancient history where I tend to be on my own. Q·L·1968 22:47, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, the IP may be back in 30 days. This IP is a ninja. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:08, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hittite New Kingdom royal family tree

[edit]

Hello QuartierLatin1968, I saw recently that you added the family tree mentioned above to the article Kuzi-Teshub an studied it. I found three people missing. Because I was not able to find the template of the Hittite New Kingdom family tree I would leave this to you. Those are the three persons absent from the family tree:

  • Zida, son of Šuppiluliuma I. He leaded the Hittite troups to a battle in Mitanni. From: Klinger (2007), p. 57.
  • Ḫalpa-šulupi, son of Muršili II. Ḫattušili III mentions him as one of his siblings: "My father sired us four children: Ḫalpa-šulupi, Muwatalli, Ḫattušili and Maššana-uzzi, a daughter. From all those I was the youngest child." From: Haas (2006), p. 91.
  • possibly Ḫartapu, the great king, son of Muršili, the great king. Ḫartapu was great king of Tarḫuntašša in likely 2nd half 13th century BC, who is thought to be the son of Muršili III = Urḫi-Teššub by some scholars including Bryce. From: Bryce (2012), p. 21 f.

Those are the missing members of the Hittite royal family. I leave it to you if you add them to te family tree but no doubt this would be good for completeness.--Tarchunes (talk) 06:51, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

By chance I finally discovered the template and added Ḫalpa-šulupi and Ḫartapu to it. Zida I left away because there could be the possibility that Zida, son of Arnuwanda I in your tree is interpreted as a son of Šuppiluliuma I by Klinger. There may possibly also be two Zidas in the Hittite family tree but I really don't know.--Tarchunes (talk) 18:22, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Tarchunes: Well done! Sorry I didn't get around to adding these yesterday, but I see you worked it out perfectly. Q·L·1968 01:28, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Faustina the Elder, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Juno and Vesta. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:04, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cernunnos

[edit]

You have reverted my edit, perhaps based upon your own theory - or a general neo-pagan belief - that there are many representations of Cernunnos that do not name that god. However a slight knowledge of the archaeology would aver that there are many such horned gods otherwise named, and that therefore no unnamed image can be claimed to have held that name. Please, as soon as you are able and if you are able, add an authoritative archaeological reference stating that there are numerous images that definitely represent Cernunnos - or else allow this unsupported claim to be removed. Thanks. Redheylin (talk) 18:39, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Redheylin: Thanks for being willing to discuss! Sorry to use the "revert" option (which feels like a more unfriendly gesture than I mean it to be), but I think it's warranted in this case. I'm moving this over to Talk:Pillar of the Boatmen for simplicity's sake (I often can't remember where all the threads of a conversation have been once they've started in different places). All the best, Q·L·1968 05:15, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Til Barsip, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tarhun. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nero Claudius Drusus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Batavi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, QuartierLatin1968. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, QuartierLatin1968. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Forum Gallorum, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bononia, Decimus Junius Brutus and Lucius Antonius. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hinduism in the West Bank listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hinduism in the West Bank. Since you had some involvement with the Hinduism in the West Bank redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 00:47, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hinduism in the Gaza Strip listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hinduism in the Gaza Strip. Since you had some involvement with the Hinduism in the Gaza Strip redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 22:10, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hinduism in Cuba listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hinduism in Cuba. Since you had some involvement with the Hinduism in Cuba redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 16:25, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, QuartierLatin1968. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:DarjeelingGorkhaOrientationMap.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob13Talk 01:29, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No objection here! I'm sure there are far more high-quality equivalents now. Q·L·1968 04:12, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hinduism in Haiti listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hinduism in Haiti. Since you had some involvement with the Hinduism in Haiti redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 03:01, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hinduism in Ecuador listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hinduism in Ecuador. Since you had some involvement with the Hinduism in Ecuador redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 02:28, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wade–Davis Bill, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages James Harlan and William Sprague (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, QuartierLatin1968. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]