User talk:Porchcorpter

NOTICE: Are you really sure you want to post here? Well, if you do, the following policies, guidelines or essays apply to this talk page. Please make sure you comply with all of these policies, guidelines and essays. If you do not follow any one of these pages, your post will be labelled as such to one of these pages:

WP:CIVIL
WP:NPA
WP:AGF
WP:EQ
WP:BOLD
WP:WOLF#Legitimate criticism (must be followed, NOT WP:WOLF#Harassment)
WP:ANC
WP:BEAR
WP:TNC
WP:Mistakes
WP:Punishing productivity
WP:Questions allowed
WP:How you edit
WP:Peak usage
WP:Saying something doesn't make it so
And for some people (not all), WP:DBI

Please note that there are no archives for this talk page -- I got rid of them. So it is unlikely there will ever be an archive.
You are welcome not to sign your posts on this talk page. However, you must give a clear indication that it was you who wrote the comment.

Speedy criterion G7

Hi Porchcorpter, I contested your speedy deletion nominations because that criterion is for pages you created for which you are the only substantial contributor. Regards! VQuakr (talk) 04:24, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seperated section (not related to this topic)

Not related to this topic. We were talking about my G7 nominations. Porchcorpter 11:08, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
I've tagged a couple of them for merges because I think they'd make more robust articles together than they do standing alone. Do you fancy doing the merge, maybe some expansion, as you're more familiar with the topic? Andy Dingley (talk) 10:22, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply] I have manually merged it. Cheers. Porchcorpter 11:04, 12 April 2016 (UTC

Suggestion

Hi Porchcorpter. Can I suggest that editing your userpage to complain, regularly over the course of months, is not a productive use of your time? You've not made any Wikipedia edits in a long time - there are places where you can be of help, either through working on articles or helping to make Wikipedia a better place. Sitting here and brooding is no good for you and if that's all you want to do, I suggest you might want to quit. Worm^TT(talk) 10:11, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Helping to make Wikipedia a better place"? You might want to answer how others made Wikipedia a better place for me. Porchcorpter 11:15, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Btw I am using Meta for all this instead here. Porchcorpter 11:16, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:23, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm truly sorry, Porchcorpter, but you are clearly not here to help us build the English language Wikipedia any more - your block expired four years ago, yet you are still doing nothing but complaining about what's bad about Wikipedia and how badly you believe you were treated. I think I am one of the most lenient admins on the project (though not as lenient as Worm), but even I cannot avoid the clear conclusion that enough is enough. This block is really aimed at helping you to put the past aside and move on with your life. You are clearly not suited to working in the Wikipedia environment, and I strongly urge you to forget about it and get on with your life in other directions - and I wish you well in your future endeavours. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:12, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just to note, this is where my mind was heading and the reason for my suggestion. I expect I would have blocked myself had any more grumbling appeared on your userpage. Worm^TT(talk) 18:38, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Porchcorpter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16042 was submitted on Jun 27, 2016 03:01:11. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 03:01, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To any reviewing admin who looks here, please see this Meta page in which Porchcorpter reiterates his inactivity policy on English Wikipedia. Remaining inactive and doing nothing to contribute to the project, but just using his user page to carry on a years-long stream of complaints, is not doing us or him any good at all. For his own good and for ours, he seriously needs to drop the stick and just go away. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:09, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Porchcorpter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16070 was submitted on Jul 02, 2016 08:16:29. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 08:16, 2 July 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Porchcorpter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16073 was submitted on Jul 02, 2016 23:45:56. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 23:45, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Porchcorpter. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not looking to be adopted any longer

Thanks for the assistance. Kartano (talk) 22:10, 18 December 2019 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Porchcorpter. You have new messages at Kartano's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nomination for deletion of Template:Newsubpagename

Template:Newsubpagename has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Q 𝟤 𝟪 16:14, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]