User talk:Pjesnik21

Dubravka Ugrešić

Hi, hoping to find some compromise on this article -- can we discuss further on Talk:Dubravka_Ugrešić if needed? MichelCastagne (talk)

Proposed deletion of Nikol Bulat

Hello, Pjesnik21. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Nikol Bulat, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Nikol Bulat to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Wgolf (talk) 16:32, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nikol Bulat may have broken the syntax by modifying 10 "{}"s and 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:08, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Nikol Bulat.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Nikol Bulat.jpg, which you've attributed to http://www.tportal.hr/showtime/estrada/97311/Seksi-Nikol-Bulat-i-zeljko-Pervan-se-dohvatili-alata.html. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Green Giant (talk) 10:22, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Sahara (music band)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sahara (music band), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.andreasite.eu/?page_id=1149.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:30, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Tvoje Lice Zvuči Poznato (Croatia) Logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Tvoje Lice Zvuči Poznato (Croatia) Logo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

March 2015

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of House of Anubis episodes into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. If trying for a split, see WP:SPLIT and propose one on the source page. Then do it properly if there is no opposition to the proposal. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:03, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Touchstone of Ra (2013 film poster).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Touchstone of Ra (2013 film poster).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:17, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nikol Bulat

The article Nikol Bulat has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Natureium (talk) 18:53, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Pjesnik21. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

August 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Alisson, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:44, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of England–Croatia football rivalry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article England–Croatia football rivalry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/England–Croatia football rivalry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 09:39, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kim Petras discography; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Silovaću tebe i tetkovića u šupčine do smrti jazavčino rvacka Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 19:40, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Misici - Senidah.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Misici - Senidah.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Croatia–Serbia football rivalry, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Red card and Aleksandar Mitrović (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:49, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dejan Lovren, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joe Gomez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:28, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Croatia national football team crest.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Croatia national football team crest.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mario Mandžukić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AFC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020

Your recent editing history at Era Istrefi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – Βατο (talk) 18:23, 12 January 2020 (UTC) peško prestani šiljit kitevinu na šiptarku i prebaci se na olmovicu — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.143.82.58 (talk) 17:15, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Četiri godine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danijel Popović (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:57, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Cesc Fàbregas does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:19, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nikola Vlašić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Russian Cup (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:19, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

2020 coronavirus pandemic in Croatia

I just wanted to explain why I have reverted your edit on the graph in this article. It is much easier to edit and to change the graph with section for months rather than to have one section for all days, which could lead to a cluster in which it is hard to differentiate what day is associated with the corresponding value. Thanks --Tuvixer (talk) 10:36, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Maya Berović; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:47, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

2020 coronavirus pandemic in Croatia - March 2020

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Tuvixer (talk) 22:46, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Direct, reliable sources needed for Days of the Year pages

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages now require direct reliable sources for additions. For details see the content guideline, the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide or the edit notice on any DOY page. Almost all new additions without references are now being reverted on-sight.

Please do not add new additions to these pages without direct sources as the burden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages.

Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 18:53, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Bojan Krkić, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:26, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Croats of Bosnia and Herzegovina, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. ——Serial ^# 12:37, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Croats of Bosnia and Herzegovina

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Tuvixer (talk) 13:05, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dejan Lovren, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Russian Cup.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:47, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Novak Djokovic

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--WEBDuB (talk) 20:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Operation Storm

Hello, I see you added new information about the 25th anniversary. But quotes such as “ Minister Vulin stated: "And whichever Serb they buy or bring over to a celebration of extermination of Serbs and place him alongside Ante Gotovina and other Ustashas, they won't be able to change the truth about the civil war they provoked, about massacring and killing Serbian children in refugee columns."” Should there not be some follow up to the factual validity of what Vucic is claimed? Otherwise readers would take all these quotes as fact. OyMosby (talk) 14:40, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

I just added all significant information I could find in Croatian and Serbian media. I have no idea what other information I should to add. Pjesnik21 (talk) 15:21, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Persecution of Croats in Serbia during Yugoslav Wars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slankamen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Senidah on MAC 2019.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Senidah on MAC 2019.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 00:38, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Senidah on MAC 2019.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Senidah on MAC 2019.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rina Sawayama - Come Des Garçons (Like The Boys) (Pabllo Vittar x Brabo Remix).jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rina Sawayama - Come Des Garçons (Like The Boys) (Pabllo Vittar x Brabo Remix).jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Croatia national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ivo Grbić.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:43, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kiril Simonovski. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 19:00, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Marin Pongračić

added links pointing to Abductor muscle and Red Bull Salzburg

Stefan Milić

added a link pointing to Red Bull Salzburg

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020–21 GNK Dinamo Zagreb season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Free transfer and Bojan Knežević.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020–21 NK Osijek season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Olimpija Ljubljana.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:11, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Senidah - Ko je.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Senidah - Ko je.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:40, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Senidah - Piješ.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Senidah - Piješ.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:41, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Daily Mail reference at Luka Modrić

Hi! The Daily Mail reference you added at Luka Modrić needs to go. See WP:DAILYMAIL. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 22:42, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Ivan Rakitić. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sakiv (talk) 22:21, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Pocket Palma

Hello, Pjesnik21. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pocket Palma".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:06, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Croatia football team restyle

Hi, @Pjesnik21:, Pjesnik21, sorry to interrupt, can you help me please, I have no idea why the new edits at Croatia national football team got reverted for "vandalism". What? It's not vandalism. I'm trying to rearrange some parts of the article, omit some unnecessary stuff and fixing the tone a little bit, if you see fit, can you help return the article to the version at 15:52, 9 October 2020 that was edited by you, please? Thanks. 2402:9D80:20D:53F6:73D6:F832:87A:BF0B (talk) 13:10, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Hey do you hear me? Pls help me as I said above.42.113.119.56 (talk) 12:56, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

There is no need to edit the article as it is good as it already is Pjesnik21 (talk) 13:02, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Senidah - Viva Mahalla.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Senidah - Viva Mahalla.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:35, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Kraljice šoka

Dodaj uspijeh Hrvatskih rukometašica u članak Cinderella (sports), i to u podlistak Examples of Cinderellas that did not win the championship. Unaprijed hvala i sve čestitke kraljicama. Jolicnikola (talk) 13:53, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mirko Hrgović, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Croatian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Sergej Jakirović

Hey! I've seen your edits on Sergej Jakirović regarding his nationality. He has dual citizenship, Bosnian and Croatian and he will be marked as that. When it comes to flag icons, I'm gonna be putting the Bosnian flag since he is mainly reffered to as Bosnian by the media, and when he was Maribor manager his flag icon was Bosnian and was portrayed by Slovenian media as Bosnian. He is also refferd to as Bosnian on many websites, mainly Soccerway.com and Sofascore, so please keep in mind putting the Bosnian flag by his name. We'll keep the Bosnian and Croatian nationality on his main page. Thanks in advance! User:Kirbapara (talk) 16:34, 28 December 2020 (CET)

Nomination of 2021 Tribistovo poisoning for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2021 Tribistovo poisoning is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 Tribistovo poisoning until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

—Brigade Piron (talk) 20:10, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on René Redzepi; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sam Sailor 17:34, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to René Redzepi. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. The Banner talk 11:02, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Daniel (Montenegrin singer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montenegrins in Croatia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Yugoslav footballers infobox

Pozdrav Pjesniče, this issue has been debated several times and the outcome always favoured to write just city and country in infobox for Yugoslav cases, and write proper details like banovinas, republics and autonomous provinces in prose in the article, Some of the main reasons were the insistance of Kosovar editors in removing SR Serbia and adding Kosovo, or practical exemples like the lenght of SR Bosnia and Herzegovina, FkpCascais (talk) 18:46, 16 February 2021 (UTC) Wherever you see a republic in infobox be free to remove it, and this is how it should be displayed, exemple´FkpCascais (talk) 19:01, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Dua Lipa

Hello @Pjesnik21: I hope you are well. It is a shame the disagreement we have had on the Dua Lipa article. What I want to ask you is that you be a little more neutral, you are supporting to put a version of the Lipa ethnic controversy where there are conclusions like "alludes to the Illyrian theory of the origin of the Albanians" when none of the sources even mention the term "Illyrian" nor is the alleged nationality of Twitter users mentioned in any of the sources and is therefore in breach of WP:NEUTRAL and WP:FORUM. I have reviewed your contributions and your editions are about articles related to Yugoslavia and the countries that used to form it, which makes me think that you are Serbian or Croatian and coincidentally the dispute we are having is about a subject that has to do with Serbs. You have a history of edit wars on articles related to Yugoslavia and its countries, which makes me think that you act so that your point of view is reflected in Dua Lipa's article, but Wikipedia is not a forum to post our personal opinions about a topic. I will presume good faith and assume that you want to collaborate to improve this project, and therefore I ask you to to only improve the article instead of promoting biased and not very neutral information. That's why I ask you to comply with the policies of this encyclopedia or else I will have to report you. Thank you. Alexismata7 (talk) 03:26, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Sorry about quick-fire revert on Michael Haneke

Hi Pjesnik21,

I quickly reverted this with the comment "Vandalism", which was a bit hasty, as I realized afterwards. Sorry about that – usually when just the word "Nazi" is added anywhere, it tends to be vandalism!

I see you have already reverted my revert. I still believe your edit is not ideal, and should be "German Reich" instead. But I will do a bit of research what the style rules are pertaining to that here in the en-WP.

P.S.: As the son of a Munich born Father who fought in WW2, I am painfully aware of who was in power 1942, when Haneke was born. No missed history lessons there, nor an attempt to sugar-coat anything, by preferring the official designation of the time, as is the style rule in the German WP. --Sprachraum (talk) 01:52, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Liverpool F.C. matches in international competitions for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Liverpool F.C. matches in international competitions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Liverpool F.C. matches in international competitions until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

— NapHit (talk) 16:07, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Novak Djokovic, you may be blocked from editing. Theonewithreason (talk) 26 April 2021 (UTC)

The content that I added at Novak Djokovic is sourced in the text. Pjesnik21 (talk) 11:54, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

The article is about Novak Djokovic not about his mother, should we put the same category for Luka Modric and Goran Ivanisevic then? Theonewithreason (talk) 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Unlike Djokovic, there is no credible source about Modric's and Ivanisevic's origin speculations. Furthermore, if Djokovic's mother is Croatian, then Djokovic is a Serbian person of Croatian descent. That is how genetics work. Pjesnik21 (talk) 11:59, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

You are wrong the same newspapers you are using to prove Djokovic heritage can be used for Ivanisevic and Modric, also you are forgetting that Djokovic has a father too and the article is about Novak not about them.Theonewithreason (talk) 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Yes, Novak has a father, but category "Serbian people of Serbian descent" would not make any sense, right? Djokovic confirmed his heritage himself in a 2006 interview with Slobodna Dalmacija. It is also confirmed by his maternal grandfather in a 2020 interview with Nova S. All sources about Modric's and Ivanisevic's origin are Serbian tabloids, which are both biased and untrustworthy. Pjesnik21 (talk) 12:27, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Slobodna Dalmacija is a tabloid too and the fact that you are using Croatian newspaper as a source shows that you are not acting by the standards of english wikipedia, generally any newspaper articles are not WP:RS Theonewithreason (talk) 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Slobodna Dalmacija is not a tabloid. Plus, unlike Serbian tabloids that do not cite their sources and just pull stuff out of their ass, this Slobodna Dalmacija article is an interview with Novak himself, meaning he is saying that himself. Also, here is a video of Dijana Đoković saying that she is a Croat when she was a guest at Balkanskom ulicom. Pjesnik21 (talk) 13:33, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Slobodna Dalmacija are probably the worst tabloid in Region. Most of Croatian newspapers are. Everybody remembers their unsourced accusation after EURO 2012 and the game against Czechia The fact that Djokovic himself never repeated that on any other newspaper goes in that argument, not to mention WP:AGEMATTERS and the fact that Dijana does not say that what you are implying, she is talking about confusion between Hrvatica and pevacica. But it seems that dont understand what I am saying, this is not an article about Dijana Djokovic, it is about Novak. Also since you are so eager to defend the fact that Croatian newspapers are "righteous" but Serbians are not it goes against WP:NEUTRALITY, I am not going to further discuss with you about that since those are already clear and standardised rules of Wikipedia, meaning that newspaper articles are not reliable source being Serbian or Croatian, that there are already discussed consensus about every source and also on WP:RSN everything is clear, so please try to cooperate with other editors, go through archives on talk page see what was discussed. Theonewithreason (talk) 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Slobodna Dalmacija are not a tabloid at all, let alone the worst one. But that is irrelevant at this point. Dijana says that her husband's relatives misunderstood that she said she is a singer (pevačica), when in reality she said she is a Croat (Hrvatica). No discussion is needed, one of Novak's ancestors is Croatian, therefore he is a person of Croatian descent. Pjesnik21 (talk) 15:35, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

The other one is Serbian so therefore he is of Serbian descent, but I didnt wanted to discuss about that. Anyways my suggestion is that you use more reliable sources in the future other than Croatian tabloids, we already found them and discussed them [10 editors, years of discussion] feel free to check, but since this discussion is going nowhere, I wish you well and good health. Cheers. Theonewithreason (talk) 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Well, nobody denied his Serbian roots. It was you who denied his Croatian roots when you removed his page from Category:Serbian people of Croatian descent. Pjesnik21 (talk) 15:59, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Mateo Kovačić. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:18, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Barjaktarovic

A da ti napraviš članak o Jadranki Barjaktarović, da prevedeš sa srpskog jezika? Ne bi bilo zgoreg. Uglavnom, unapred hvala. Jolicnikola (talk) 23:05, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 10

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

David Frankfurter

added a link pointing to British Mandate of Palestine

Dubravka Ugrešić

added a link pointing to Varna

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Frankfurter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British Mandate of Palestine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

Your recent editing history at Rita Ora shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Binksternet (talk) 20:12, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Grigor Dimitrov. —J. M. (talk) 17:42, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Përparim Hetemaj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baltic Cup.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Do not leave information unsourced

In future, do not remove extra sources when they are needed to prove a chart position, as you did here at Tinashe discography. You will be reverted and warned in future. Thanks. Ss112 04:10, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Focus (Ariana Grande song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Howling.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Stats table layout

Hi there. I saw you added the international stats table for Josip Juranović. Thanks! Going forward, please use the standard table layout at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players. It is the result of past discussions of the community of football editors at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 14:38, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Chlöe. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:51, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 14:21, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

MOS:OVERLINK

I restore most of your recent edits but you don't need to linking common words such as "rapper" or "casino" in articles, a lot of people already know what these things are. Common cities like New York City and Las Vegas don't have to be linked either. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 22:36, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Pjesnik21, you need to stop with this rampant overlinking. Read WP:OVERLINK and WP:SEAOFBLUE and stop adding links to common terms, places and cities. This is getting out of hand. @TheAmazingPeanuts: Since Pjesnik21 is not responding, if you can, keep an eye on the links they're adding to articles. Ss112 12:58, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Don't include more than 10 reviews in Template:Album ratings

Regarding your addition of Pitchfork to the ratings template on Animal (Kesha album), please keep the reviews to 10 per what it says at Template:Album ratings. Remove one if there are already 10. Thank you. Ss112 12:30, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Stop pointing redirects directly to the track listing section

Do you really think this helps? It doesn't. Most of those articles mention the song in other sections, in greater detail, than its listing in the track listing section. Please stop doing this. I will revert this if I see you doing it any further. Ss112 12:39, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Also, do not change quoted material. On Pop 2 (mixtape), you changed "10" to "ten" in a quote. What were you thinking? Ss112 12:45, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021

Hello, I'm Tbhotch. Your recent edit(s) to the page Marry the Night appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 21:27, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Macedonian people of Ukrainian descent

A tag has been placed on Category:Macedonian people of Ukrainian descent indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:10, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Ti

Baš si glup k'o kurčina, majke ti se ustaške najebem — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.175.38.135 (talk) 22:42, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Jadranka

I'm created article of Jadranka Barjaktarović so i would ask you to fix if there are any mistakes and delete the unnecessary parts if there are any. Of course I made it with a prefix until that article is fully ready. Jolicnikola (talk) 23:54, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Marina Tucaković songwriting discography moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Marina Tucaković songwriting discography, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. _signed, Iflaq ^(talk) 17:02, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Milutin Milanković. Theonewithreason (talk) 25. November 2021 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GiantSnowman 07:35, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar

I am a great admirer of your work regarding Croatian football. Your work has inspired me to create Croatian Wikipedia pages for all missing Dinamo Zagreb players. Recently, I have even started updating player stats on a weekly basis, just like you. I have translated dozens of English Wikipedia articles which you have edited and expanded them to the point where they are bigger than their English language counterparts (e.g. hr:Dani Olmo, e.g. hr:Lovro Majer). Currently I am in the process of expanding hr:Mislav Oršić. I'd also like to invite you back to hr.wiki (Croatian Wikipedia). Hr.wiki isn't as bad as it was previously. All the bad POV admins have either been banned or have left the project (e.g. Kubura, SpeedyGonsales). If you wish not to return, we could at least cooperate in cross-language creation and expansion of articles. Cheers! Croxyz (talk) 19:59, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Croatia national football team results (2020–present), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aleksandr Golovin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page. --Hipal (talk) 19:32, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

[1] --Hipal (talk) 02:26, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Petar Bočkaj

I expanded the hr.wiki article for Petar Bočkaj. Fell free to translate it. P.S. idk if you saw the award which I gave you. Croxyz (talk) 00:15, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Career statistics MOS

Hi Pjesnik21, I appreciate your edits on Croatian footballers including Marcelo Brozović, Šime Vrsaljko, Ivan Perišić, Mario Pašalić, and more. Could you please follow the WFP MOS guidelines for editing the stats table though? Divisions are really not supposed to be rowspanned at all as it looks better on mobile devices, plus the consensus is to not rowspan across different clubs at all. Cheers. Rupert1904 (talk) 23:36, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dream Doll, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Absurdist.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Grimes (musician). Thank you. Suonii180 (talk) 14:53, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Charli XCX discography, you may be blocked from editing. Ss112 23:24, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Baffling WP:OVERLINKING

You unlink pop music but then think all these other words should be linked...you need to read WP:OVERLINK. Please try to avoid linking in quotes, especially this many to very common terms in a musical context (beat, chorus, crescendo...really?). Thank you. Ss112 12:01, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

You are still doing this. Please read MOS:LINKSTYLE: "be conservative when linking within quotations", and stop linking common terms like electric guitar and guitar solo, especially within quotes. "Same-sex" is pretty self-explanatory, and everything involving just one sex does not equate to homosexuality, so that could be interpreted as an WP:EASTEREGG link. If you continue doing this I will raise it with an admin because you clearly are not listening to me. Ss112 16:54, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Stop adding WP:EASTEREGG links like this. Ss112 08:27, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Marina Tucaković songwriting discography

Hello, Pjesnik21. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Marina Tucaković songwriting discography, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

May 2022: Don't edit war when you are reverted. WP:BRD applies

Your recent editing history at So Sad So Sexy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ss112 14:00, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

A chain of links is preferred in chronologies, and we should not have multiple chronologies per the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 62#Multiple infobox chronologies, so yes, it does make sense. Ss112 14:00, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Marina Tucaković songwriting discography

Hello, Pjesnik21. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Marina Tucaković songwriting discography".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:06, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Dejan Ljubičić

Hello Pjesnik21, may I remind you to provide a source for the information you added on Dejan Ljubičić's brother? Thank you, Modussiccandi (talk) 10:38, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Billboard World Charts

On the one hand, you are partially correct, Billboard 'Hits of the World' charts track both streaming and downloads. WP:RECORDCHARTS says to use charts that are recognised in their country as a measure of popularity and success. These charts are in their infancy and there's no evidence that they are widely accepted in the countries they are published for. The HDU chart is the long established chart for Croatia and is widely accepted as a measure of a song's success. Therefore it becomes WP:INDISCRIMINATE to include multiple charts for the sake of it. You need consensus to include it. Per WP:BRD, you were bold, you were reverted (which means there's no census), the responsibility is now on you to discuss and get a consensus. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 12:55, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Night Time, My Time. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:34, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lana (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Equestrian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nilüfer Yanya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nilüfer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:31, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Last warning for WP:OVERLINKING

Much more of this and I'm reporting you to an administrator. As I have told and linked you to before, Wikipedia's guidelines state "be conservative when linking within quotations" per MOS:LINKSTYLE, and you apparently still cannot stop yourself from adding links to basically every term in quotes. Enough is enough. Next time I see ridiculous edits like this you're being reported. Ss112 07:05, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

• @Sergecross73: Serge, I'm following through on my assurance to this uncommunicative editor that I would report their rampant overlinking to an admin. See here for today's ridiculous example of Pjesnik21's style of overlinking to very common terms. I have left this user messages and asked them to stop overlinking and be conservative about what they link inside of quotes per MOS:LINKSTYLE since this time last year: #MOS:OVERLINK. See also the section #Baffling WP:OVERLINKING. I don't think this user is going to stop. TheAmazingPeanuts has also asked them to stop overlinking and as you can see, they've been warned by a variety of editors for adding unsourced material, edit warring and other disruption. They have refused to elaborate on anything here or reply to anybody. It's WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT all around. What do you think? Ss112 11:22, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres, as you did to All Up in Your Mind, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Ss112 10:58, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Megan Thee Stallion discography, you may be blocked from editing. Ss112 20:43, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Chronology

We do not include albums that don't have a link to an article. Queen Radio: Volume 1 will never have an article as its just a playlist of songs that are already released. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 13:33, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Blocked

I don't usually like to block editors for things as minor as overlinking, but your talk page really is concerning. You've received so many unanswered/unaddressed warnings for overlinking, edit warring, unsourced additions, etc. it's unacceptable. Wikipedia is a collaborative project. You can't just be ignoring these concerns and do whatever you want.

Your block expires in 1 week when you return, I hope you'll start working with other editors, not just ignoring them all the time. Sergecross73 msg me 14:07, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

@Sergecross73: This user's insufferable overlinking continues unabated: [2] and [3] and God knows how many other recent examples. I don't know why Pjesnik21's main purpose on Wikipedia is to visit articles and work out how many different other articles they can link to, but I have asked them multiple times to stop with the sea of blue and to bear in mind MOS:LINKSTYLE about being conservative with linking inside of quotes and they haven't. Seems like they have no interest in taking your advice to work with editors or take on board what they say. Ss112 06:34, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Pjesnik21, is there something I'm missing here? Is there something you don't understand? You're violating OVERLINK far more frequently than would be explained by a simple mistake or oversight, especially after being blocked for it. Again, I hate blocking people for a relatively minor thing like this, but if you're frequently causing a burden on other editors by mistakes you've been warned about, you're going to get your account blocked again. Sergecross73 msg me 16:18, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

@Sergecross73: Right after this: IDIDNTHEARTHAT at its finest and apparently readers don't know what a gay club and Jesus are. This is a daily occurrence from Pjesnik. Ss112 12:45, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Final warning. Any more bad WP:OVERLINK violations and I'm blocking your account. I may very well block it indefinitely, at the very least until you decide to acknowledge and participate in this discussion. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, you cannot just opt out and ignore editors who have good faith concerns about your editing. Last chance. Sergecross73 msg me 17:32, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

@Sergecross73: This user still hasn't responded to any concerns by me or Muhandes (who started a thread below) and has continued on without interruption introducing ridiculous overlinking like this today (Who doesn't know what rock and roll is, or what "spoken word" means?) and disregarding of being conservative with linking inside quotes. I'm really tired of Pjesnik21 refusing to say anything to any other editor and continuing to do this while remaining silent all over the encyclopedia. I've also just found Pjesnik21 being reverted for adding a category, then adding the category back four minutes later without any explanation here by a different editor. Ss112 06:52, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

October 2022

Please explain your contributions using a descriptive edit summary. Changing information on Wikipedia (such as numbers and dates) without explanation, as you did at List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 2020, may be confused with vandalism. Thank you. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 15:25, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank you (List of 2022 albums)

Ah, another case of looking and not realizing what was going on. Thank you for reverting my edit! TheCartoonEditor_{(he/him/they)} (talk) (contribs) 00:43, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Edit summaries

It would be sad to see you blocked over this, but you were asked at least five times before to leave edit summaries, and you refuse to engage in communication, which is mandatory. Please, it would be a shame to lose you as editor, but you were blocked twice before. --Muhandes (talk) 09:55, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 FIFA World Cup controversies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2022 Iranian protests.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Croatia national football team records and statistics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canada national football team.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Stefan Bajcetic

In case you did not notice those positions are wp:red links. Fix them, please? Your edit results: Defensive Midfielder, Attacking Midfielder. Try using wp:Show preview. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 10:18, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Croatian kuna

added a link pointing to Koruna

Hajde da se volimo (album)

added a link pointing to Mujo

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Croatian kuna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Koruna.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Overlinking, collaborative editing

For months now, editors have been asking you to communicate about edits you're making. You've refused. People have made simple requests, like stop overlinking articles. You've refused. As I've said, Wikipedia is a collaborative project. Refusing to discuss contentious edits is not an option.

Your account is blocked from editing. All you need to do is respond to this discussion and

1. Agree to discuss issues with others
2. Read WP:OVERLINK and explain it to me in your own words.

If you do this, your account will be unblocked immediately. If you don't, your account will remain blocked. (And any future accounts you create will be blocked on-sight.)

You may need to WP:PING me if this takes you more than a few days to respond.

It's all up to you now. Sergecross73 msg me 19:40, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Liverpool F.C. matches in international competitions for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Liverpool F.C. matches in international competitions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Liverpool F.C. matches in international competitions (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Idiosincrático (talk) 22:18, 1 July 2024 (UTC)