User talk:Pizzamaniac09

David Carradine

You recently added "raising himself alongside his family in San Francisco's neighborly city of Oakland". But I don't know what that adds. It already said that he graduated from Oakland high school, so it stands to reason that he lived in Oakland. What does "raising himself alongside his family mean"? [He lived with his mother until he dropped out of college]. I think that that praise just adds too much erroneous information to the sentence and makes it hard to read. Unless you can make the meaning more clear, and find a way to put it in another sentence, I would like it to go back to the way it was. If you have a source for the 1955 graduation date, however, I would keep that in.--DorothyBrousseau 05:30, 5 January 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dorothybrousseau (talk • contribs)

November 2008

Your edits to 1974

Dear Pizzamaniac09,
Some of your edits on the page 1974 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

The page you linked to is a Disambiguation page.

Please choose the individual that you mean from that page, and link to their Wikipedia page. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 15:34, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Birthday details

Please stop adding the names of television shows to actor entries. Not only are they excessive detail and against general practice, they're occasionally absurd--I rather doubt that Michael Douglas, famous film actor and winner of the Academy Award for Best Actor for Wall Street is best identified as appearing in The Streets of San Francisco. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 12:57, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

The Bob Newhart Show

Hi. I have reverted the extensive changes to made to this article, as I do not think they are beneficial to the article overall. The new synopsis you provided was poorly written, and the long list of guest stars was unnecessary (every TV show that last for a number of seasons will have a similar list). If you would like to make changes to the article, please use the article's talk page to discuss them in advance, to be certain that you have consensus to do so. Thanks. Ed Fitzgerald _{t / c} 21:39, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Referencing

Hi Pizzamaniac09, can you please add in text references when adding information, rather than citing vague sources in the edit summaries? If you don't know how to do this, please check out WP:CITE. Thanks, Somno (talk) 03:09, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Linda Evans

Thank you for removing the opinion that you added to the Linda Evans article. Just because you have an opinion about her chemistry with Forsythe, that doesn't mean that everyone had that same opinion. Dismas|^(talk) 05:41, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

August 2009

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Kiss (band), even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. GripTheHusk (talk) 00:38, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Pizzamaniac09, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! A8UDI 04:44, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

I know you've been here for some time, but I thought this might be useful for you.

Referencing again

Hello Pizzamaniac09. Do you have a reliable source that says that Chris Daughtry is a born-again Christian? That sort of information needs a source if it is to be included. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 21:26, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Same goes for Justin Guarini. Please be sure to supply sources for any information that is not commonly known, especially if controversial. Thanks. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 06:27, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Julie Harris

I've reverted the last four edits you made to Julie Harris as nothing you added was attributed to a reliable source. You must also be mindful of Wikipedia's policies for the biographies of living people. It boils down to this: if you do not provide a reliable source, do not add it. It's that simple. If you follow that, you can't go wrong. I see that this has been brought to your attention before, so please take this seriously. Rossrs (talk) 07:39, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

last warning

If you carry on adding unsourced original research to biographies of living persons, as you did to Maureen McCormick and other articles as put forth above, you'll be blocked from editing. Gwen Gale (talk) 21:22, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

List of stage names

Hi. Thanks for your addition to the list, i.e. Robert Cummings. However, although you are correct about his real first name, he was already removed from the list as he does not qualify. The list clearly states that "People whose main forename happens not to be the first one (such as Paul McCartney and Marie Osmond) are not listed here—these are their real names, not stage names." I left an explanation as well on the list's talk page. Please feel free to continue adding names which qualify under the list rules. Yours, Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 19:09, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

March 2010

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Larry Hagman. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Stating that "[You] got an e-mail from a fan saying just that" is not a sufficient source. Sottolacqua (talk) 20:05, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to List of Emergency! characters. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Stating "The was received from an emergency fan!" is not a sufficient source. Fjbfour (talk) 03:31, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

---

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:09, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Scrabble (game show), please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Saying "I saw it on YouTube" is not going to cut it. Nicholasm79 (talk) 06:47, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to William Howard Taft High School (Los Angeles, California). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Manway (talk) 18:28, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article List of people from Pasadena, California, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Manway (talk) 03:34, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

"A source was added"

Why do you keep saying "a source was added" to summarize edits with no sources? 70.152.70.38 (talk) 21:04, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Jackée Harry, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please note that fan sites are not considered reliable sources. Thanks! Logical Fuzz (talk) 04:22, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Candi Staton

Candi was born in 1943. This is according to her daughter and an interview I personally conducted with her back in the 80's. Thank you --Canyouhearmenow 12:58, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

List of stage names

Hi. I rv your edit adding Rosa Parks to the list of stage names as this list is solely for people "in the entertainment industry" as the information at the head of the page clearly states. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 18:36, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Jackée Harry

As you have been warned before, please do not add unsourced, non-NPOV material to BLPs, especially by reinserting text another editor has remvoed as unsourced BLP text, as you did with this edit to Jackée Harry. Thank you. Novaseminary (talk) 14:33, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Adding names to year articles

Any names added to such articles should have international notability. Please don't add names of people who are just minor American actors. It should be clear that if we added only minor American actors, let alone similar minor actors from other countries, the lists would become unreadable. Dougweller (talk) 06:22, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

November 2010

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for You have had many comments, complaints and warnings about your edits, and have responded to none of them. If you wish to continue editing, you must demonstrate a willingness to communicate and show that you understand the comments on your talk page and what you are going to do to avoid such comments in the future. If you do this, you may be unblocked.. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dougweller (talk) 21:01, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

If you do plan to communicate on your talk page, now's the time to do it, not just email me. Use the unblock template. Dougweller (talk) 15:30, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Copy {{unblock|Your reason here}}, replacing 'Your reason here' with your reason that you want to be unblocked. Read the block notice again carefully so that you are clearly responding to it. I'm watching this page, there is no need to email me. Dougweller (talk) 16:10, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pizzamaniac09 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Disruptive editing

Decline reason:

{That's why you were blocked, not why you should be unblocked. — Daniel Case (talk) 19:50, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

: has never responded to complaints about lack of sources and other warnings. The reason why I want to be unblock is because I failed to respond to any administrator about why I didn't give a certain source, because I failed the meet the certain requirements. (User talk:Pizzamaniac09), 17:14, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pizzamaniac09 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Disruptive editing: has never responded to complaints about lack of sources and other warnings

Decline reason:

Declined, and talk page protected. Stephen 12:29, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Write in this section explaining why you think you were blocked and what you will do in the future to be a better Wikipedian

The reason why I was blocked is because of disruptive editing, I have never responded to complaints about no sources and other warnings. From now on, if any messages come up in the future, I will start communicating with other editors.

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Child's Play (game show), but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Sottolacqua (talk) 02:56, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

When I was editing "Child's Play," I was only getting information from the host, as far as clues were concerned, yet something was missing from what Bill Cullen said. Pizzamaniac09 talk 02:59, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

The edit you made was your own opinion about clues being tricky or obvious. Sottolacqua (talk) 03:15, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

I edited it and had absolutely no resource, whatsoever. I didn't include it. Thanks for writing! Pizzamaniac09 talk 03:16, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Calendar articles

Please stop adding pointless, badly formatted and occasionally ludicrous detail into the biographical entries on the date pages.--CalendarWatcher (talk) 08:22, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

I didn't mean any harm, though I added some big stars, esp. Laura Innes, I had no rights using meaningless description on each of the calendar articles, about the years they were born.--Pizzamaniac09 talk 01:48, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

I'm not at all certain what exactly it is that you're trying to say. If you're attempting to say that the descriptions you keeping adding are not meaningless, you are incorrect: they appear to be almost randomly chosen examples of each person's work, invariably formatted in italics, which offer no important information or detail. If you're attempting to say that you understand that you were wrong to add this pointless detail, then perhaps you would care to explain this edit? --CalendarWatcher (talk) 09:08, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

I don't know what to tell you, I thought I was adding some things that were important to the star such as a TV series in italics, when I was wrong. I guess I didn't make myself quite clear when I wasn't supposed to add a TV show or a description relating to him/her in the first place. Pizzamaniac09 talk 09:20, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Flag icons

Please stop adding flag icons to the infoboxes of actors per MOS:FLAG. Thank you. GcSwRhIc (talk) 15:31, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

I will not do it, not this time, please. Pizzamaniac09 talk 16:14, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. GcSwRhIc (talk) 16:57, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

You don't want to ever see me goof off, using flag icons, when I can use the star's spouse, other name or even their own website, or there'll be consequences against me. Pizzamaniac09 talk 17:05, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Mantooth and Tighe articles

Hello and happy Fourth of July! Just letting you know that I reverted your changes to both the Randolph Mantooth and Kevin Tighe articles. Because both articles are biographies of living persons, it's important that references be given for claims such as those you included in both articles. If you have references that back up those claims, feel free to readd the info in the articles. Without references, however, the statements really can't stand. If you have any questions about adding references and what references are considered acceptable and verifiable in Wikipedia, please see the article on citing sources found here: WP:CITE. Thanks! Lhb1239 (talk) 23:12, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

I was talking to an Emergency! fan on Facebook, and told me these facts about Randy & Kevin, yesterday. They were both being injured off-camera, while performing the stunts. Pizzamaniac09 talk 24:38, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Unsourced trivia and ludicrous credits

Please stop adding trivia that you just 'know' to be true, as you did to Loretta Swit. An actual reliable source that a reader can use to confirm the veracity of a claim is the minimal that is required: 'I saw it on Youtube' is nowhere near enough of a reference

Also, and you've been told this before, STOP ADDING RANDOM--OFTEN RIDICULOUS--CREDITS TO ACTOR LISTINGS IN THE CALENDAR PAGES. Not only are such credits in general not used, you picked the most trivial and ridiculous ones at that. So, once again, STOP DOING THAT. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 14:17, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

I apologized for adding trivia that are on YouTube also for adding trivia on the calendar that's not right. I thought each actor was well-known for their roles, but it just wasn't right. --- Pizzamaniac09 talk 14:43, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

I will remind you that you have been indefinitely blocked before for your actions, and continuing to do the same things even after having been warned numerous times before and after will see you blocked permanently again, no matter what apologies you profess. Your border-line incoherent response does not fill me with any confidence that you understand what you're doing wrong, and suggests that you will continue to make the same mistakes. To simplify:

• Do NOT add credits to actor/performer entries on the calendar pages. I see that you persisted in this practice even after your block was lifted. Do not do this. Not at all. Not one. They do not belong. Full stop.

• Do NOT add trivia to biographical articles for its own sake. Especially, do NOT add unsourced trivia to biographical articles. And absolutely, positively do NOT add unsourced trivia with 'Citation Needed' tags already included to biographical articles, as that says that you're repeating something that you KNOW has no source. So do not do this. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 08:20, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

This is too complicated. I was trying to find some articles, when you wouldn't accept them. I just don't know why I've been blocked because of this. If I want to find some true statements, then, each of them are to be sourced. --- Pizzamaniac09 talk 21:26, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Dick Van Dyke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dr. Mark Sloan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

I removed the characters off Dick Van Dyke's pages. Those were both meaningless. Pizzamaniac09talk 13:48, 25 February 2012 (UTC).

Disambiguation link notification for Mar 2

Hi. When you recently edited Norman Lloyd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Morse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

I corrected David Morse's occupation, because obviously there are a lot of David Morse's. Thank you, also I would like for you to stop sending me messages, please? (talk) 11:38, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

IMDB's trivia is not reliable

Hello: I've removed your recent edits to Jane Wyman. IMDB's trivia section has no editorial oversight and is not considered a reliable source. Regards, Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 02:34, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of The Courtship of Eddie's Father episodes may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• , invites an aspiring actress ([[Victoria Vetri]]), 1968 [[Playboy]] [[Playmate of the Year]]) to live with Tom ([[Bill Bixby]]), much to the chagrin of Mrs. Livingston ([[Miyoshi Umeki]]). The

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:30, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Blake Carrington, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 03:32, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

January 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Julie London, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 07:28, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Randolph Mantooth

Hi Pizzamaniac. I wanted to come by and touch base to say Hello and also to say how very much appreciated you are. I wanted to discuss your recent edit to the Randolph Mantooth article. You and I want the same thing - an accurate well-written article for this actor. So let's go over a few things and we can work together.

• (of London's potty-mouth) this phrase is not used in the interview cited and for that reason must be removed unless of course another references is cited that uses this phrase exactly.

• of his TV nurse, - just fluff and unnecessary.

• As a five-year-old boy, he was also a fan of her music, as well<:ref name>http://us.imdb.com</ref>, - Okay, you only state “imdb.com” in the ref and this only links to their main page. It is not mentioned in Randy's imdb bio – so if perhaps you saw it in the “trivia” section on imdb – then it is unreliable because any user can add trivia to imdb which may or may not be true. Sorry, this statement must be removed if it cannot be verified.

• years before he went on auditions with the lead actress (London) on Emergency!, with the insistence of her ex-husband and creator Jack Webb, which paid off, despite the bitter feud, between Mantooth and Webb, with a lack of eye contact<:ref name="JGP">"Q&A with Randy Mantooth". Retrieved 11 January 2014.</ref> I'm sorry – but none of this statement is quoted on this Q&A at johnnysgreenpen.com and again must be removed if it cannot be verified.

• but he got along real well with London, as she became Mantooth's soul, surrogate mother, mentor and friend, throughout the show's 8 seasons<:ref>http://crntalk.com/larrymanetti</ref>, I do not see any of this on the link provided. Now, I'm thinking you might have an old link for this that may not work anymore from crntalk.com. If so, you might try https://archive.org/web/ which is a web archive and may provide an archived link for this source – or you can provide that old link here and I can help get it. But if you provide a reference – it must be a working link that any one can go to and verify.

• along with Tighe, as well, where the chemistry of London, Mantooth and Tighe were all a success story of 1970s television, and she also invited both Mantooth and Tighe to her's & Troup's own house. When the series ended, Mantooth stayed close to London until her death on October 18, 2000, nearly 2 years, after Troup had died. - no reference was provided for any of this amd unless provided, must be removed as well.

I have your talk page on my watchlist so if you reply you can just do so here on your page and we can keep the conversation in one place. You obviously have much more information than I, and with two jobs my time for research is limited. So you are very valuable. Again I say, you and I just want this actor's article to be accurate and respectable, and I can help with verifiability and format. I didn't want to offend you and revert, so maybe with these explanations you can remove what cannot be verified, for now anyway. Any questions, I am always here to help. Cheers. ♫ Cricket02 (talk) 06:03, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Concentration (game show) has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. AldezD (talk) 14:36, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Winkelvi. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kevin Tighe, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Elivispelvis.com isn't considered a reliable source for support of Wikipedia content. Find something that would be acceptable reference-wise and the content you added could be included in the article. -- Winkelvi ● ✉ ✓ 22:42, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

October 2014

Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Donna Douglas, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 03:12, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ted Lange may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• article/0,,286951,00.html</ref> The same year, the cast also appeared on ''The Oprah Winfrey Show]]'', as well, to talk about the show's success. In 2013, the rest of the cast and Lange appeared on '

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:20, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Friendship with....

I've removed all the "friendship with" sections you recently created. They were ridiculously large and detailed, heavy on quotes and light on encyclopedic information. Those may be suitable for a magazine or tv guide article, but not an encyclopedia entry. Just because they are sourced, doesn't make them suitable.--Atlan (talk) 20:31, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

List of Falcon Crest episodes

Thanks for your contribution to List of Falcon Crest episodes, but it looks like the plot summaries are lifted word-for-word from another website, which is a copyright violation. You need to rewrite them in your own words or they will have to be removed. Even when citing the external website as a source you can't copy their text without explicit permission. Thanks.— TAnthony^Talk

TAnthony|Talk, I removed all the episodes ... as soon as I try to get my new computer, I'll pick numerous scrap sheets of paper and rewrite the Falcon Crest synopsis in my own words, from various sources, and will have enough time to upload them. I'll do my best. Thanks. User Talk:Pizzamaniac09.

You can restore the table if you'd like, just without the plot summary text.— TAnthony^Talk 22:40, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Biographic information about related individuals

Over the past two days I've had to pare-back three additions you've made to musician articles. The problem wasn't sourcing, although it's not terrific, the problem is that the information is not about the subjects in the articles, it's about their parents. WP:BLP deals with the subjects themselves. There are sections that discuss those related to them and the practice is to be brief, factual and not reveal unnecessary detail. If you feel that I've done harm to the subjects, feel free to revert, or preferably, discuss it on the BLP talk pages. Link to your version and then to mine and ask if my changes are appropriate. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:15, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Oh no, everything's fine. I didn't quite understand. Got nothing to worry about. User:pizzamaniac09, 20:05, 12 February 2015.

February 2015

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to The Price Is Right (U.S. game show). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

diff—Warnings date back to 2009 for adding unsourced/improperly cited material. Please include cites from WP:V sources with your edits. AldezD (talk) 14:29, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ralph Waite. AldezD (talk) 21:56, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

April 2015

Please use cite template rather than simply bare URL. 115.164.208.248 (talk) 23:22, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Jane Wyman. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Anonymous blog sources such as "highlighthollywood.com" are not reliable sources. McGeddon (talk) 19:16, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Pizzamaniac09. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)