Jump to content

User talk:Piraiyone

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Piraiyone. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm Suneye1, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information:
  Introduction to Wikipedia
  The five pillars of Wikipedia
  Editing tutorial
  How to edit a page
  Simplified Manual of Style
  The basics of Wikicode
  How to develop an article
  How to create an article
  Help pages
  What Wikipedia is not
 Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
  Do be bold
  Do assume good faith
  Do be civil
  Do cite reliable sources
  Do maintain a neutral point of view
  Don't spam
  Don't infringe copyright
  Don't add original research
  Don't commit vandalism
  Don't get blocked
If you need further help, you can:
  Ask a question
 or you can:
  Get help at the Teahouse
 or even:
  Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

Your contributed article, Araiyan Raja Rajan (aka) Vikrama chola

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Araiyan Raja Rajan (aka) Vikrama chola. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Araiyan Rajarajan. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Araiyan Rajarajan. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. ─ The Aafī (talk) 15:04, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Araiyan Raja Rajan (aka) Vikrama chola moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Araiyan Raja Rajan (aka) Vikrama chola, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 18:38, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I jumped the gun on this one and did not see this had been deleted for being a duplicate. Please add the information to Araiyan Rajarajan; I have redirected the article you created to it, but I've left the draft up for now so you can rescue whatever you had that was different. Cheers! Skarmory (talk • contribs) 18:47, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Skarmory, I just declined the draft. ─ The Aafī (talk) 19:26, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I added citation and also submitted for review. I have an doubt, where will I go for citation if the content is purely new for web World. Piraiyone (talk) 18:59, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make improvements, please add references at Araiyan Rajarajan and don't unnecessarily create new articles ─ The Aafī (talk) 19:24, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not creating article unnecessarily. Just I'm not having the reference and citations. Please mind your words. Piraiyone (talk) 19:39, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Araiyan Raja Rajan (aka) Vikrama chola (January 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheAafi was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Araiyan Rajarajan instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
─ The Aafī (talk) 19:22, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Araiyan Raja Rajan (aka) Vikrama chola

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Araiyan Raja Rajan (aka) Vikrama chola. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Araiyan Rajarajan. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Araiyan Rajarajan. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 20:39, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Raja Raja chola I moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Raja Raja chola I, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 08:18, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Karikala Kannan moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Karikala Kannan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. دَستخَط، اِفلاق (کَتھ باتھ) 12:00, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Araiyan Raja Rajan (aka) Vikrama chola

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Araiyan Raja Rajan (aka) Vikrama chola requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Duplicate of Araiyan Rajarajan with any additional info having already been merged into that article.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 06:16, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rajamahendran

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Rajamahendran, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Shirt58 (talk) 09:44, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Manukula Kesari

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Manukula Kesari requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 19:52, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Manukula Kesari moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Manukula Kesari, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. It also needs to be reworked for grammar and usage. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:53, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Manukula Kesari has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Manukula Kesari. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:53, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Manukula Kesari

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Manukula Kesari requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mvqr (talk) 10:29, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Manukula Kesari

[edit]

Hello, Piraiyone

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Manukula Kesari for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Pyrrho the Skipper (talk) 16:06, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Piraiyone

Thank you for creating Manukula Kesari.

User:Pyrrho the Skipper, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia, but an article should contain some content before being published.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Pyrrho the Skipper}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Pyrrho the Skipper (talk) 16:08, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


An article you recently created, Sanga varman, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curbon7 (talk) 01:05, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gangai kondan is not a page

[edit]
What is kanchi?Xx236 (talk) 09:38, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please add Categories Xx236 (talk) 09:39, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Manukula Kesari

[edit]

Please add Categories.Xx236 (talk) 09:35, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

how to add categories Piraiyone (talk) 12:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sanga Varman

[edit]

Please add Categories.Xx236 (talk) 09:41, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

how to add categories Piraiyone (talk) 12:31, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Submitting for review Piraiyone (talk) 18:19, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Chevur moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Battle of Chevur, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I again remind you that text [[WP:COPYVIO|copied and pasted from other websites] - in this case https://www.indiancontents.com/2017/07/parantaka-chola-ii-battle-of-chevur-and.html - is a violation of Wikipedia's Wikimedia:Terms of Use and copyright policiesShirt58 (talk) 10:41, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Chevur moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Battle of Chevur, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Itcouldbepossible Talk 11:41, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Piraiyone, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Sanga varman, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! LynRuch (talk) 17:25, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sanga varman

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Sanga varman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This articles references do not show that the subject it’s qualified to be included in Wikipedia, no links just a paragraph indicating nothing.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. LynRuch (talk) 17:25, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gangai Kondan (June 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
As written, this consists of two sentences that go no further than stating that he existed, containing absolutely no substantive content to suggest a reason why his existence warrants an encyclopedia article, and is "referenced" to a contextless list of books that are not being used to footnote anything so that we know how much each of those books does or doesn't say about him.
You need to write and source a lot more than just "Gangai Kondan is a person who existed, the end" before it can be approved.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Bearcat (talk) 17:32, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Piraiyone! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bearcat (talk) 17:32, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanga Varman (June 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
What's his notability claim (that is, what's the reason why he should have an encyclopedia article), and what content in which sources support it (that is, where are the footnotes)? You need to write and source a lot more than just "Sanga Varman is a person who existed, the end" before it can be approved.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Bearcat (talk) 17:35, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manukula Kesari (June 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
What's his notability claim (that is, what's the reason why he should have an encyclopedia article), and what content in which sources support it (that is, where are the footnotes)? You need to write and source a lot more than just "Manukula Kesari is a person who existed, the end" before it can be approved.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Bearcat (talk) 17:35, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Chevur (June 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This requires a lot more substantive content about the battle than just saying that it happened, and a lot more footnoting than just an unannotated list of books, before it can be accepted.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Bearcat (talk) 17:37, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manukula Kesari (June 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
See earlier comments.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Gusfriend (talk) 12:51, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanga Varman (June 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 0xDeadbeef was:
The previous decline was not addressed, and it looks like you just copied reference entries from another article without knowing if they are related to the person at all.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
0xDeadbeef 07:03, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manukula Kesari (June 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The only thing you've done since the last time this was rejected is add one citation to a Blogspot blog, which is not a reliable or notability-supporting source at all per WP:BLOGS. You have done nothing to address the substance of the past reviewer comments at all.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Bearcat (talk) 19:48, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Karikala Kannan for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karikala Kannan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karikala Kannan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:07, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanga Varman (July 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Four of the references point to another Wikipedia article. Of the remaining two references, one is just a note, while the second gives no details about the source beyond a title.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 11:31, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rajendra Chola I, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brahmadesam. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rajendra Chola I, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brahmadesam.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Bodhidharma, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 03:30, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gangai Kondan

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Piraiyone. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gangai Kondan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Chevur

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Piraiyone. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Chevur, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

[edit]

Hello, I'm Nightenbelle. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Pandyan Civil War (1169–1177), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Nightenbelle (talk) 18:24, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

how can I add citation now Piraiyone (talk) 18:33, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gangai Kondan

[edit]

Hello, Piraiyone. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gangai Kondan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:32, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Chevur

[edit]

Hello, Piraiyone. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Chevur".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:41, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sanga Varman

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Piraiyone. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sanga Varman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please click on Tamil

[edit]

I don't think that's what you thought would show up. Doug Weller talk 11:59, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you recently removed content from Pandya dynasty without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. utcursch | talk 06:44, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hi Piraiyone! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Rajendra Chola I that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 23:02, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Pandya dynasty, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 01:40, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Rasnaboy (talk) 08:44, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

SKAG123 (talk) 18:03, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Manukula Kesari

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Piraiyone. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Manukula Kesari, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:03, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Manukula Kesari

[edit]

Hello, Piraiyone. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Manukula Kesari".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Telugu Chodas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tamil.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Piraiyone&oldid=1188715306"