User talk:Philafrenzy/Archive 28
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Philafrenzy. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | → | Archive 35 |
DYK nomination of Philip Hugh-Jones
Hello! Your submission of Philip Hugh-Jones at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Nizil (talk) 05:59, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
George Hyde Pownall
You create the article on George Hyde Pownall who lived 1866 – 24 January 1939. There's a Wikidata item of a person with the same name who lived from 1876-1932 which is also linked to authority references like viaf. Do you know whether those are two different people? If not are you sure about birth or death date? ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 15:55, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- They are the same person. Those other dates have been shown to be incorrect by new research that is in the current version of the article from La Trobe Journal. Philafrenzy (talk) 16:08, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks Phil. The wikidata items have been merged, and I'll fiddle with DoB & DoD dates to reflect La Trobe as authoritative. --Tagishsimon (talk) 16:42, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Geoffrey Victor Price Chamberlain.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Geoffrey Victor Price Chamberlain.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Since you created this, you might want to check WP:JWG for how to expand the article. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 06:40, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- Would obviously also be of relevance for the other journal articles you've created. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 06:41, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks, interesting cover on that one. Philafrenzy (talk) 08:39, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- Would obviously also be of relevance for the other journal articles you've created. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 06:41, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
The article Journal of Surgical Case Reports has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective database: not in Scopus, MEDLINE, or any Clarivate Analytics database (except the not very selective Emerging Sources Citation Index). Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 15:46, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:06, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Journal of Surgical Case Reports for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Journal of Surgical Case Reports is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of Surgical Case Reports until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 18:49, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Minchington Hall
On 21 January 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Minchington Hall, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Minchington Hall (pictured) in Middlesex, England, was said to have one window for every week of the year? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Minchington Hall. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Minchington Hall), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:01, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
The article International Journal of Artificial Life Research has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable journal, published by a predatory publisher. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 11:33, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Rose v Royal College of Physicians
On 24 January 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rose v Royal College of Physicians, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1701, the apothecary William Rose was charged with illegally practising physick on a butcher? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rose v Royal College of Physicians. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Rose v Royal College of Physicians), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 00:03, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Cullands Grove
On 25 January 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cullands Grove, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that an 1832 auction of the contents of Cullands Grove included three hundred and seventy cases of wine, two Shetland ponies, a fire engine, and two "humane" man traps? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cullands Grove. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Cullands Grove), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 00:01, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
The article The Old Kings Arms has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not notable.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joe (talk) 12:18, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Man Mohan Singh (pilot)
On 27 January 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Man Mohan Singh (pilot), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1930, Man Mohan Singh (pictured) flew his Gipsy Moth Miss India solo from Croydon Airport, South London, to PAF Base Faisal, Karachi? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Man Mohan Singh (pilot)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Kevin K. Cheng
This is new Kevin K. Cheng...but I can't find much more. Edit if interests you. Thanks...otherwise will leave it be. Whispyhistory (talk) 18:13, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Will look, very strong hook material in the lead. Philafrenzy (talk) 18:17, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks..yes..many hooks here. He sounds fantastic. Whispyhistory (talk) 18:26, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
DYK for David Hechstetter
On 28 January 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article David Hechstetter, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1720, wealthy merchant-adventurer Sir David Hechstetter directed that his body be buried without any "pompous ostentation"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/David Hechstetter. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, David Hechstetter), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!
|
The 2018 Cure Award |
| In 2018 you were one of the top ~250 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs. |
Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 17:41, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
CUP
Will you be interested in List of Cambridge University Press book series? To show its notability there ought to be more articles on individual series and public domain books/series needs to go to Wikisource. Solomon7968 03:51, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- Yes I am very interested in book series, thank you for doing this. If you write the articles the best commentary on the series tends to be in the reviews of the individual volumes in academic journals.
- I have indicated how I would format the list. Not sure why they think the Cambridge History of South Africa is a series though. Philafrenzy (talk) 06:29, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- P.S. Here's one I did: Seminar Studies in History. It needed a separate list of the titles. You could spend the rest of your life doing those if you did the authors too. Philafrenzy (talk) 06:33, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- I don't think we should be doing the authors; others may do but I won't waste any time on it. Randykitty (see my talk page) has objections to just creating a soup of red links and what he says is indeed true. Not all the series published by CUP is notable, what I would like is that Wikipedia has an article on every topic for which CUP has launched a series. For now this series needs to have high quality citations. Solomon7968 10:16, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- I agree not all the series are notable, but I suspect it is more than you may think, particularly for CUP. As for the red links, if they were all red-linked how many would have articles in 1/5/10 year's time compared to none being red-linked? We will never know. There's this. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:34, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- I see that you have delinked all; there is no need to do that. I would have selectively delinked. Solomon7968 10:38, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- Please go right ahead and revert me if you wish. I was just demonstrating what it would look like. You didn't format or link any of them originally. I have no idea which are notable or not at present. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:43, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- I don't have access to JSTOR or any other resource at this moment to demonstrate their notability. So if you wish you can proceed as you do before and then we can delink after the task is completed. It is far too much work for me alone to do this. The best way to judge notability seems case by case creating few and delinking few for every topic, say anthropology. Solomon7968 10:51, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- I also don't have full JSTOR. I can tell you from experience that book series are difficult subjects to research (Seminar Studies in History took a long time) because the detailed discussion of them as a series that is needed to show their notability separately from the authors and individual volumes, tends to be buried in reviews of new volumes in academic journals meaning you have to consult a lot of sources to compile the article. I will try to do some of the history ones as that is my main field. Philafrenzy (talk) 11:00, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- I don't have access to JSTOR or any other resource at this moment to demonstrate their notability. So if you wish you can proceed as you do before and then we can delink after the task is completed. It is far too much work for me alone to do this. The best way to judge notability seems case by case creating few and delinking few for every topic, say anthropology. Solomon7968 10:51, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- Please go right ahead and revert me if you wish. I was just demonstrating what it would look like. You didn't format or link any of them originally. I have no idea which are notable or not at present. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:43, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- I see that you have delinked all; there is no need to do that. I would have selectively delinked. Solomon7968 10:38, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- I agree not all the series are notable, but I suspect it is more than you may think, particularly for CUP. As for the red links, if they were all red-linked how many would have articles in 1/5/10 year's time compared to none being red-linked? We will never know. There's this. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:34, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- I don't think we should be doing the authors; others may do but I won't waste any time on it. Randykitty (see my talk page) has objections to just creating a soup of red links and what he says is indeed true. Not all the series published by CUP is notable, what I would like is that Wikipedia has an article on every topic for which CUP has launched a series. For now this series needs to have high quality citations. Solomon7968 10:16, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- P.S. Here's one I did: Seminar Studies in History. It needed a separate list of the titles. You could spend the rest of your life doing those if you did the authors too. Philafrenzy (talk) 06:33, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- I have indicated how I would format the list. Not sure why they think the Cambridge History of South Africa is a series though. Philafrenzy (talk) 06:29, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
A bowl of strawberries for you!
|
Thank you for helping so many editors Whispyhistory (talk) 20:53, 29 January 2019 (UTC) |
- Thank you. One good turn deserves another. Plenty of people have helped me, especially you! Philafrenzy (talk) 21:18, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Fulke Rose
On 30 January 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fulke Rose, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that physician Fulke Rose treated the privateer Henry Morgan with millipede powder and oil of scorpion? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fulke Rose. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Fulke Rose), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 00:03, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Christian Cabrol
On 31 January 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Christian Cabrol, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that French surgeon Christian Cabrol performed Europe's first heart transplant in 1968? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Christian Cabrol. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Christian Cabrol), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 00:02, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:59, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:07, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Ivy Evelyn Woodward
On 2 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ivy Evelyn Woodward, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1909, Ivy Woodward became the first female member of the Royal College of Physicians? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ivy Evelyn Woodward. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ivy Evelyn Woodward), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:04, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:05, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:06, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:08, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:09, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:08, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Stephen Godin
On 12 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Stephen Godin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Stephen Godin was a steward of penitent prostitutes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Stephen Godin. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Stephen Godin), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
– Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:05, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Category:Lawrence Alma-Tadema has been nominated for discussion
Category:Lawrence Alma-Tadema, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 00:07, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Infobox
Hi..Not sure whether to ask you or @Redrose64:. If a medical person is also a significant other eg footballer, author or painter....how do I add to infobox. eg David Owen who is a politician and medical person. Whispyhistory (talk) 20:23, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- I think you use the most appropriate one. For Owen it is politician. But you can expand infobox person with modules: Wikipedia:WikiProject Infoboxes/embed listed here. Philafrenzy (talk) 20:44, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Ok...I'll look and see if I can figure out. Thanks as always. Whispyhistory (talk) 20:58, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Wikipedia, the encyclopaedia anyone can edit - as long as they have a degree in computer science. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:00, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Oh..I'm in need of help then...No computer science degree and very poor in English...I'll stick to medicine...have a few more transplant surgeons on way. Thank you kindly again. Whispyhistory (talk) 21:07, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Your English is very good. I am still learning new things about the language every day. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:23, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- See for example Sebastian Coe, who made his name as an athlete but later went into politics. Here, we have which is one infobox inside another -
{{Infobox politician |honorific-prefix = [[The Right Honourable]] |name = The Lord Coe ... other parameters pertaining to {{Infobox politician}} ... | module = {{Infobox sportsperson | embed = yes ... parameters pertaining to {{Infobox sportsperson}} ... }} }}{{Infobox sportsperson}}inside{{Infobox politician}}. For David Owen, you can do the same sort of thing, provided that all three of these are true:- the
{{infobox officeholder}}template supports the|module=parameter - the infobox that you wish to embed supports the
|embed=yesparameter or an equivalent - There is consensus for this at Talk:David Owen.
- the
- Of these, 1 is definitely true; and assuming that you wish to use
{{infobox medical person}}, 2 is sort-of true - you need to use|child=yesinstead of|embed=yes; but 3 is not true (there are no discussions about infoboxes there), so I would start a discussion there before adding an embedded infobox. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 12:39, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- See for example Sebastian Coe, who made his name as an athlete but later went into politics. Here, we have
- Your English is very good. I am still learning new things about the language every day. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:23, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Oh..I'm in need of help then...No computer science degree and very poor in English...I'll stick to medicine...have a few more transplant surgeons on way. Thank you kindly again. Whispyhistory (talk) 21:07, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Wikipedia, the encyclopaedia anyone can edit - as long as they have a degree in computer science. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:00, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Ok...I'll look and see if I can figure out. Thanks as always. Whispyhistory (talk) 20:58, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
![18:01, 14 February 2019 (UTC)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Philafrenzy/Archive_28#c-RonBot-2019-02-14T18:01:00.000Z-File:Richard_DeWall_and_"bubble_oxygenator"_heart-lung_machine_20_Nov_1956.jpg){kind=link}
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:06, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:06, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Teamwork Barnstar |
| Great teamwork ... on everything Whispyhistory (talk) 15:04, 15 February 2019 (UTC) |
- Thank you, same to you. I feel we are neglecting the patient in the picture! Who is he? He seems to be an identifiable person. Philafrenzy (talk) 15:16, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- I re-read the sources...passing mention of "recipient" only. Was the body in Rembrandt's painting discussed? Whispyhistory (talk) 16:35, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Probably not, it was most likely an executed criminal or a body dug up by grave robbers, but this one seems different. Philafrenzy (talk) 19:52, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- I re-read the sources...passing mention of "recipient" only. Was the body in Rembrandt's painting discussed? Whispyhistory (talk) 16:35, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Philip Hugh-Jones
Hello! Your submission of Philip Hugh-Jones at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:44, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Beaver Hall
On 20 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Beaver Hall, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1871, Beaver Hall (pictured) was demolished so that the neighbours could have a "private green belt"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Beaver Hall. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Beaver Hall), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:01, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:22, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Arnold Dohmen has been accepted
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Legacypac (talk) 09:11, 23 February 2019 (UTC)Arnold Dohmen moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Arnold Dohmen, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 14:46, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
DYK for John Buddle Blyth
On 24 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Buddle Blyth, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John Buddle Blyth and August Wilhelm von Hofmann were the first to report photopolymerisation? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Buddle Blyth. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, John Buddle Blyth), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Images
Hi.. Please may I Kindly request your help in adding images to Archer Blood and his book The Cruel Birth of Bangladesh - Memoirs of an American Diplomat please? Whispyhistory (talk) 17:03, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- Done the book. As for Blood, is this him, or this? Philafrenzy (talk) 18:58, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you. I think he is [1] after looking through some video footage. The other one may possibly be a young version. Whispyhistory (talk) 19:15, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- I don't think those are the same men. Philafrenzy (talk) 19:33, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- I'm afraid I don't know then. Whispyhistory (talk) 19:35, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- The best source would be a contemporary US government official portrait. That certainly exists and may emerge in due course. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:30, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- Do you have a book on nabobs? Philafrenzy (talk) 23:00, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- The best source would be a contemporary US government official portrait. That certainly exists and may emerge in due course. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:30, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- I'm afraid I don't know then. Whispyhistory (talk) 19:35, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- I don't think those are the same men. Philafrenzy (talk) 19:33, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you. I think he is [1] after looking through some video footage. The other one may possibly be a young version. Whispyhistory (talk) 19:15, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- sorry, just saw this last question...Yes, I do, strangely. Can't see anyone of interest in there but will look again. Another query, ...in the list of surgeons in the finger assisted nephrectomy painting, which ones are notable for own article or are they all notable just for being in the painting?Whispyhistory (talk) 08:23, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Good word "Nabob". Very clickable. Nobody is notable just for being in a painting, but that fact and a few lines about their participation certainly helps to support the existence of an article. I would think that most of them are notable if you can find the sources. Do you have any spare reviews available? I have two that need them. Philafrenzy (talk) 08:30, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Nabobs
- This is an example Richard Smith (East India Company officer). There are many. There is no category of nabobs. I found a potential "John Foote" (unable the send link). You could search it and see if appropriate. Whispyhistory (talk) 08:42, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- yes..I saw that. I'll contribute if you create one Whispyhistory (talk) 08:48, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- The painting helps, as it does with the surgeons. Later. Philafrenzy (talk) 08:51, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- yes..I saw that. I'll contribute if you create one Whispyhistory (talk) 08:48, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Percy Furnivall.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Percy Furnivall.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
