User talk:Perseus, Son of Zeus/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions with Perseus, Son of Zeus. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
All Pages: | 1 - ... (up to 100) |
Welcome to Wikipedia!
|
Friendly suggestion
Why don't you work on some articles for awhile instead of adding to your userpage? I know it's fun and there are lots of boxes, but we're here to improve an encyclopedia. Cheers, PrincessofLlyr royal court 15:35, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
Sure! I am getting kind of bored of those boxes. I will be working on The Red Pyramid (novel) for a while, editing it. And whatever I find that is incorrect or, well, need references. Thank you for the tip!Perseus, Son of Zeus (talk) 15:53, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Kane wings color.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Kane wings color.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:18, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Non-free files in your user space
Hey there Perseus, Son of Zeus, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Perseus, Son of Zeus. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.
- See a log of files removed today here.
- Shut off the bot here.
- Report errors here.
Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:02, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
Suggestion
It might be helpful if you noted your user account on the userpage or talk page of the IP you frequently use. PrincessofLlyr royal court 16:02, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Whew. Checked a lot of new pages today, a lot of them vandalism/spam! 173.49.140.141 (talk) 20:18, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 21:09, 24 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
You have a reply --Addihockey10e-mail 21:09, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Rollback
I'm not an admin, but just a note, the admins will probably want more than 92 edits before granting you rollback. They'll probably be happy to give it to you at around 300 though. Cheers, Access Denied [FATAL ERROR] 21:12, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Expanding on the above, it doesn't look like you've been using Twinkle, admins typically want you to use twinkle prior to using actual rollback. See you around! --Addihockey10e-mail 21:18, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 21:19, 24 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
~NerdyScienceDude 21:19, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 05:56, 1 November 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
It's raining thanks spam!
- Please pardon the intrusion. This tin of thanks spam is offered to everyone who commented or !voted (Support, Oppose or Neutral) on my recent RfA. I appreciate the fact that you care enough about the encyclopedia and its community to participate in this forum.
- There are a host of processes that further need community support, including content review (WP:GAN, WP:PR, WP:FAC, and WP:FAR). You can also consider becoming a Wikipedia Ambassador. If you have the requisite experience and knowledge, consider running for admin yourself!
- If you have any further comments, input or questions, please do feel free to drop a line to me on my talk page. I am open to all discussion. Thanks • Ling.Nut (talk) 02:28, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi
Hello, I was just wondering why you edit under your IP. It is sometimes confusing on talk pages! --Glimmer721 talk 22:28, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
- Well, I like it that way. But I'm signed in right now. Perseus!Talk to me 19:17, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of List of Heroes of Olympus characters
A tag has been placed on List of Heroes of Olympus characters, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.
If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}}
to the page and state your reasoning on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 18:00, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 22:37, 7 November 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Please respond. Jab843 (talk) 22:37, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
The_Kane_Chronicles,_book_three listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Kane Chronicles, book three. Since you had some involvement with the The_Kane_Chronicles,_book_three redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Jab843 (talk) 04:44, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
TUSC token df516430f2544bd79da7d19af86ca239
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Reviewer permission
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.
If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:58, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
November 2010
Hello. It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on others' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. ǝɥʇM0N0 23:49, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
FYI
FYI. –xenotalk 22:28, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
RFA
Would love to but requires a bureaucrat. Rich Farmbrough, 13:56, 12 November 2010 (UTC).
WikiProject Pittsburgh
Hello Perseus, Son of Zeus/Archive 1, this message is being sent on behalf of WikiProject Pittsburgh. You have previously signed up as a member and we are currently trying to determine any members that have become inactive or no longer care to be a member. If you still wish to be on the member list, please sign your name here. Thank you, on behalf of the project, Grsz11 22:07, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Wikia Failure Part Deux
I cannot send a message to Wales on Wikia as Wikia as a whole has slowed down to a crawl for the last few hours. Perhaps you could help? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.162.99.251 (talk) 22:18, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Re:Hurricane Alex
Hurricane Alex's peak intensity is 95 knots (110 mph), 946 hPa per latest best track update. Hope this helps! Darren23Edits|Mail 02:12, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
RFAs
Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Bookmarkm and Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Ggarvis1 are mal-formed RFAs for candidates who have two edits each. I have removed them from WP:RFA. Frank | talk 20:14, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Your two Requests for adminship
I don't know what you were trying to accomplish just now on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship, but editors with two total edits are not going to receive adminship. In addition, the RfAs you posted were incomplete, posted in the wrong place, and obviously unacceptable.
Please don't do anything like this again. If you have any questions you may let me know by posting here; I will watchlist this page. Newyorkbrad (talk) 20:14, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- Futhermore, besides what Brad and Frank have said above, you have to have permission from the nominees to transclude their RfAs. I have deleted Bookmarkm's since he did not respond to my query about his RfA a week ago. Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:16, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- It was probably just an honest mistake on Perseus' part. In the future, if such an RfA that will probably not pass is posted on the page, you should just remove it per WP:NOTNOW and notify the user. -download ׀ sign! 21:19, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- If you intend to continue your involvement at RfA then the following pages are essential reads: Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship explains, amongst many other things, the qualities RfA contributors usually look for in a candidate. Please also check out Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in adminship discussions. As your absurd flip-flopping here illustrates, you need to understand how to evaluate RfA candidates and so comment constructively beyond the generic one-liner that doesn't indicate any familiarity with the candidate's work (this is particulary important for new users). For now though, you'd be better off to concentrate on editing articles - it is still the only realistic way to learn the ropes and writing an online encyclopedia is what we're here for. For any queries you have, there's lots of help available, so ask away.
- And please stop mucking about with your sig - all that matters is that it is legible and unobtrusive. Plutonium27 (talk) 23:21, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 15 November 2010
- News and notes: Fundraisers start for Wikipedia and Citizendium; controversial content and leadership
- WikiProject report: Sizzling: WikiProject Bacon
- Features and admins: Of lakes and mountains
- Dispatches: A guide to the Good Article Review Process
- Arbitration report: No cases this week; Amendments filed on Climate Change and Date Delinking; Motion passed on EEML
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Page naming
I have undone your page move to St Swithun's Church, Worcester. As the church is located in England, the naming convention is without the period in the "St" abbreviation. Please see St_Michael's_Church#United_Kingdom for a list of many churches in England where this is the case. (Even when you see entries on the list that do have the period, they actually redirect to the page name without the period.) Note that this is the opposite of the behavior in American English (and others). Frank | talk 22:59, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
What made you write me?
What made you write me? 69.140.210.255 (talk) 16:01, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- Well, yes, you have a right to blank false positives, but no blanking all your warnings! To be sure, is this a shared IP address? Περσεύς|Talk to me 16:02, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- What are you talking about? Out of the cosmos you write me. What spurred this?69.140.210.255 (talk) 16:25, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- A report at AIV. Περσεύς|Talk to me 16:27, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- 69.140.210.255 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - vandalism after final warning. IP editor who keeps on adding material from blogspots into this BLP article. Editor refuses to adhere to Wikipedia's Reliable Source Guideline. He has now for the third time repeatedly spammed my talk page with loads of spam links. Issue has already been reported at AiV, yet to no avail. Could an administrator please stop this IP editor from spamming my talk page with spam links? Thank you.. Amsaim (talk) 15:52, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- Well, yes, you have a right to blank false positives, but no blanking all your warnings! To be sure, is this a shared IP address? Περσεύς|Talk to me 16:02, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- A report at AIV. Περσεύς|Talk to me 16:27, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- Ahh okay. SO now amsaim is reporting me. Tis is why I am frustrated by amsaim. Since you are the intermediary, could you ask of amsaim why was he not repsonsive. Look at the edit history. amsaim repeatedly reverted my valid edits because HE(or she) didnt like the sources. The sources were legit. I repeatedly asked amsaim to look at the sources because they are valid, amsaim refused. I then posted on amsaim's talk page with explainations of the sources. That is what amsaim is calling spam links. I think amsaim said 'spam links' as hot/flag words. Did you look at the links? Are are you just going by his words? Thank You. 69.140.210.255 (talk) 16:39, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- Well, your sources. Look at NOR. Περσεύς|Talk to me 16:44, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- I'll make a summary of your edits. (well, some are unverifiable, so I'll skip them).
- Well, your sources. Look at NOR. Περσεύς|Talk to me 16:44, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- Ahh okay. SO now amsaim is reporting me. Tis is why I am frustrated by amsaim. Since you are the intermediary, could you ask of amsaim why was he not repsonsive. Look at the edit history. amsaim repeatedly reverted my valid edits because HE(or she) didnt like the sources. The sources were legit. I repeatedly asked amsaim to look at the sources because they are valid, amsaim refused. I then posted on amsaim's talk page with explainations of the sources. That is what amsaim is calling spam links. I think amsaim said 'spam links' as hot/flag words. Did you look at the links? Are are you just going by his words? Thank You. 69.140.210.255 (talk) 16:39, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- A report at AIV. Περσεύς|Talk to me 16:27, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- A report at AIV. Περσεύς|Talk to me 16:27, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- What are you talking about? Out of the cosmos you write me. What spurred this?69.140.210.255 (talk) 16:25, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Regarding this revert, removing a notice from one's talk page is not vandalism. When a user removes a warning, they are deemed to have read and acknowledged it. Sometimes that is problematic for an IP address, but to treat it as vandalism is not correct. Frank | talk 17:07, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
User talk warning removal
Hi: I came upon your conversation above while following up something else; just thought I'd let you know that removing comments and warnings from your own talk page, whether you're an registered or an IP user, is perfectly acceptable and not regarded as vandalism, and such edits should not normally be reverted by others. This applies to valid warnings as well as "false positives". Removal of warnings etc. is simply regarded as an acknowledgement that the user has in fact read them. The relevant guideline is at WP:BLANKING. Not trying to interfere, but Wikipedia is huge and it helps to know the facts and where to find them. Kind regards, Karenjc 17:05, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
What are you doing to the List of Users with the most edits
You say it hasnt been updated since August but I just updated it 2 weeks ago. --Kumioko (talk) 20:01, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:38, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I will be going away, so I may need a talk page stalker. Thanks, Περσεύς|Talk to me 13:47, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
- Okay. Please consider lightening the green background of this page. Access Denied – talk to me 16:39, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 22:09, 20 November 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Please clarify...
what you think needs to be "wikified" in The Kane Chronicles. PrincessofLlyr royal court 13:25, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Dupe
Hi Perseus, this looks rather like that. You might want to rerun those stats to add the last few months. ϢereSpielChequers 14:02, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of 24 Caprices for Violin (Dont)
A tag has been placed on 24 Caprices for Violin (Dont), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}}
to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Osarius : Talk : Contribs 15:30, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
RFA transclusion
I see no evidence that you asked or were asked about transcluding Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Panyd 2. Do I need to put a formal ban in place, or can you stop disrupting RFA on your own? --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:54, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
RFA/Paynd
Did the candidate ask you to transclude their RFA for them? Tradition is that either nominator or the candidate does this and you transcluded it wrong anyway. Spartaz Humbug! 18:54, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, I see the user did not request you to transclude the RFA and you have been warned not to do this before. Lets be clear, if you transclude someone's RFA without permission again you will be blocked. Spartaz Humbug! 19:05, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Suggestion
Perseus, Son of Zeus, I saw the thread above about your work on the RfA page, and I know it's not the first time.
My impression is that in your excitement to help out all over Wikipedia, you are making some mistakes. This happens to a lot of people. It would be helpful if you took a deep breath and decided to concentrate for awhile in the areas you are best at.
It might be helpful if you took a look at a page called Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors, especially the section called "Working with other editors." This may give you some suggestions that could be helpful to you regarding your approach to editing, including taking advice from other users and avoiding making the same mistake more than once.
I hope this is helpful to you. Newyorkbrad (talk) 19:20, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 22 November 2010
- News and notes: No further Bundesarchiv image donations; Dutch and German awards; anniversary preparations
- Book review: The Myth of the Britannica, by Harvey Einbinder
- WikiProject report: WikiProject College Football
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Election report: Candidates still stepping forward
- Arbitration report: Brews ohare site-banned; climate change topic-ban broadened
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Adoption
I've set up my adoption program, follow the link and follow the instructions! Derild4921☼ 02:42, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- I'm kind of on Thanksgiving break right now, but I'm working on something else now. I'll finish later today (part 1). Perseus, Son of Zeus 14:39, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
You previously participated in a discussion/AFD for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeopardy! Kids Week and I'd like to make you aware of another ongoing discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celebrity Jeopardy! (2nd nomination) in which you may want to offer your own opinion. Please feel free to comment...thanks. Sottolacqua (talk) 17:37, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 November 2010
- In the news: Fundraising banners continue to provoke; plagiarism charges against congressional climate change report
- WikiProject report: Celebrate WikiProject Holidays
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Election report: Voting in full swing
- Arbitration report: New case: Longevity; Biophys topic ban likely to stay in place
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
This is an unregistered account. Please don't link to it in your signature. If you sig is too long with your full username, maybe you should, uh, shorten your sig. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 02:22, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 6 December 2010
- News and notes: ArbCom tally pending; Pediapress renderer; fundraiser update; unreferenced BLP drive
- WikiLeaks: Repercussions of the WikiLeaks cable leak
- WikiProject report: Talking copyright with WikiProject Copyright Cleanup
- Features and admins: Birds and insects
- Arbitration report: New case: World War II
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Button
I'm sorry, but is this necessary? I had just got it outlined on the left on my talk page, and now it's centered again. Thanks. Drmies (talk) 18:14, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Nice to meet you!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Rollback
Hello, per your request, I've granted you Rollback rights! Just remember:
- Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
- Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
- Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
- Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
- Please read Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
- You can test Rollback at Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback
- You may wish to display the {{User wikipedia/rollback}} userbox and/or the {{Rollback}} top icon on your user page
- If you have any questions, please do let me know.
HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:36, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Loved it!
This lousy t-shirt has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!
Per your request
I've blocked you until 2 January 2011. I've disabled your ability to edit this talk page to help you disengage during your break, but you can still use Wikipedia email if you need to get in touch with me. Enjoy your break and don't worry about WP. I hope you come back feeling refreshed in a few weeks. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:33, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 13 December 2010
- Rencontres Wikimédia: Wikimedia and the cultural sector: two days of talks in Paris.
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Algae
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Election report: The community has spoken
- Arbitration report: Requested amendment re Pseudoscience case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 20 December 2010
- News and notes: Article Alerts back from the dead, plus news in brief
- Image donation: Christmas gift to Commons from the State Library of Queensland
- Discussion report: Should leaked documents be cited on Wikipedia?
- WikiProject report: Majestic Titans
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Motion passed in R&I case; ban appeals, amendment requests, and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 27 December 2010
- Ambassadors: Wikipedia Ambassador Program growing, adjusting
- WikiProject report: WikiProject National Basketball Association (NBA)
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Your list Response
I had merged some of the info from both of Rick Riordan's series into the List of characters in the Camp Half-Blood series. Perhaps you can summarize any characters introduced in the latest series there. Rtkat3 (talk), 11:44, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Appreciation
This lousy t-shirt (talk) has hugged you! Hugs promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better (and hopefully wasn't meant as an invasion of personal space). Spread the WikiLove by hugging at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Hug others by adding {{subst:Hug}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
The Signpost: 3 January 2011
- 2010 in review: Review of the year
- In the news: Fundraising success media coverage; brief news
- WikiProject report: Where are they now? Redux
- Features and admins: Featured sound choice of the year
- Arbitration report: Motion proposed in W/B – Judea and Samaria case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
--Rock drum Ba-dumCrash (Driving well?) 16:50, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
MaxVeers (talk) 20:27, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Invitation to join WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 20:28, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- I'm in, but I'm inactive. Perseus (t • c) 20:30, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- Ok thanks for letting me know. I hope you change your mind and continue editing though. --Kumioko (talk) 20:33, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
redirecting
Redirecting is fairly simple. First find the article that needs to be redirected and either create it or delete all contents and replace it with #REDIRECT [[Target page name]]. The icon #R can be clicked to easily insert that. Derild4921Review Me! 21:08, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Enough is enough
OK, I'm going to be blunt, as usual, but you probably don't know me that well. You need to stop editing your userpage. Like now.
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia.
It is about writing, not styling your userpage.
At your editor review, your greatest work is "minor improvement". That is not acceptable. Stop talking, or editing, unless you are going to edit articles.
Look at Special:Contributions/Perseus,_Son_of_Zeus. Do you see a single article? Look at this graph.
Come on.
Mono (talk) 23:29, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
- I can't really say that Mono is that far off here. Spread yourself around a bit. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 23:56, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
- Wow. Down boy. He's not breaking any rules. 173.22.27.100 (talk) 20:07, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
- Um, yes he is, 100. Check out here—that says "Wikipedia is not a blog, webspace provider, social networking, or memorial site" to me. This is an encyclopedia. Mono (talk) 01:11, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
- Granted, Perseus has spent a little too much time in user space, but certainly not enough to warrant this. Perseus, please spend a little more time on articles and a lot less time on your user page. Mono, you should back off. No need to be harsh when a gentle reminder will do. AniMate 01:18, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
- On the other hand, when active editing articles, I advise Perseus to first gather sources and then edit articles, to avoid cases of edit conflict or original research; and to explain deletions in edit summaries or talk pages so that other editors can see the reason and won't assume vandalism. --Rontombontom (talk) 10:15, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
- Granted, Perseus has spent a little too much time in user space, but certainly not enough to warrant this. Perseus, please spend a little more time on articles and a lot less time on your user page. Mono, you should back off. No need to be harsh when a gentle reminder will do. AniMate 01:18, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
- Um, yes he is, 100. Check out here—that says "Wikipedia is not a blog, webspace provider, social networking, or memorial site" to me. This is an encyclopedia. Mono (talk) 01:11, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
User page deletion
Deleted as per your request. What's up? --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:01, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- Bunch of useless subpages to delete, too. Perseus, Son of Zeus 19:01, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- See [1] --Perseus, Son of Zeus 19:05, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- Got tired of the accusations of spending too much time in userspace, huh? Did I get everything? (Better recreate your userpage, though, or your sig will look really funny)--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:11, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- Well, partially. But I'm gonna be plain now... Perseus, Son of Zeus 20:16, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- Got tired of the accusations of spending too much time in userspace, huh? Did I get everything? (Better recreate your userpage, though, or your sig will look really funny)--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:11, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- See [1] --Perseus, Son of Zeus 19:05, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 10 January 2011
- News and notes: Anniversary preparations, new Community fellow, brief news
- In the news: Anniversary coverage begins; Wikipedia as new layer of information authority; inclusionist project
- WikiProject report: Her Majesty's Waterways
- Features and admins: Featured topic of the year
- Arbitration report: World War II case comes to a close; ban appeal, motions, and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
New Years Message for WikiProject United States
With the first of what I hope will be monthly newsletters I again want to welcome you to the project and hope that as we all work together through the year we can expand the project, create missing articles and generally improve the pedia thought mutual cooperation and support. Now that we have a project and a solid pool of willing members I wanted to strike while the iron is hot and solicite help in doing a few things that I believe is a good next step in solidifiing the project. I have outlined a few suggestions where you can help with on the projects talk page. This includes but is not limited too updating Portal:United States, assessing the remaining US related articles that haven't been assessed, eliminating the Unrefernced BLP's and others. If you have other suggestions or are interested in doing other things feel free. I just wanted to offer a few suggestions were additional help is needed. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions, comments or suggestions or you can always post something on the projects talk page. If you do not want to recieve a monthly message please put an * before your name on the members page.--Kumioko (talk) 03:58, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
Title blacklist
In response to your e-mail, I was considering the possibility of asking for Access Denied.* to be added to the title blacklist to prevent usernames matching that pattern being created, but I don't see that it'll do any good; they'll simply switch to a different name. At least while the username is predictably Access Denied followed by roman numerals, there's absolutely no doubt whatsoever that they're sockpuppets. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 19:11, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
New WikiProject Novels initiative
We have begun a new initiative at the WikiProject Novels: an improvement drive. As a member listed here, you are being notified. Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels#5-5-5 Improvement Drive and Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Collaboration for more details. Also I would like to remind you to keep an eye on the project talk page at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels. Thanks, Sadads (talk) 02:04, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
MFD nomination
Hello! I've nominated a user sub-page that you created; please see Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Perseus, Son of Zeus/Access Denied socks. HeyMid (contribs) 16:37, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Happy tenth anniversary of Wikipedia!
HeyMid (contribs) has bought you a whisky! Sharing a whisky is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the WikiLove by buying someone else a whisky, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Enjoy!
- Thanks! --Perseus, Son of Zeus 18:53, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Here you go!
WAYNESLAM has bought you a whisky! Sharing a whisky is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the WikiLove by buying someone else a whisky, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Enjoy!
WAYNESLAM 18:59, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the whisky!
-28bytes (talk) 19:03, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Happy 10th! :)
--Addihockey10 e-mail has bought you a whisky! Sharing a whisky is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the WikiLove by buying someone else a whisky, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Enjoy!
Same to you!
Dylan620 (t • c • r) has bought you a pint! Sharing a pint is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the WikiLove by buying someone else a pint, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Cheers!
Cheers! --Dylan620 (t • c • r) 19:14, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Happy Decade :)
Baseball Watcher Lets Chat has bought you a whisky! Sharing a whisky is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the WikiLove by buying someone else a whisky, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Enjoy!
Luke Castellan
You seem to be quite knowledgeable about Percy Jackson, so I was wondering if you knew which book mentions that Luke has the curse of Achilles. Brambleclawx 21:20, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
- Book Five, The Last Olympian. Hope that helps! --Perseus, Son of Zeus 15:56, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, Thank you. Brambleclawx 01:50, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Whats that?
What is this... Please Stay. Tofutwitch11 (TALK) 22:27, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
- Was considering leaving. Changed mind. --Perseus, Son of Zeus 15:55, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Time for Barnstar!
The Barnstar of Integrity | ||
Rewarded to you for speaking up at WP:ANI when it matters the most and doing whatever else is needed to keep this community safe. This lousy t-shirt (talk) 19:39, 16 January 2011 (UTC) |
At the talk page of this article (which is unreferenced) I've posted reviews and an interview from Riordan I've found. I haven't read the book yet, though. Just thought you'd like to know. Glimmer721 talk 02:25, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
While I also agree that this article should be deleted, I'm not sure how you're applying A7. It's not a band, not a corporation, not a person; I just don't think A7 is the correct tag here. (I am watching this page, so please reply here.) — Timneu22 · talk 17:07, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 January 2011
- WikiProject report: Talking wicket with WikiProject Cricket
- Features and admins: First featured picture from the legally disputed NPG images; two Chicago icons
- Arbitration report: New case: Shakespeare authorship question; lack of recent input in Longevity case
- Technology report: January Engineering Update; Dutch Hack-a-ton; brief news
ITN for Sargent Shriver
On 19 January 2011, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Sargent Shriver, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page. |
--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 03:44, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
- YAY! This is my second ITN. --Perseus, Son of Zeus 15:26, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
AFDs
Hello! In the future, when nominating pages for deletion, don't forget to list them! This AFD was never listed; that was the problem. HeyMid (contribs) 16:32, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to the 2011 WikiCup!
Hello and welcome to the 2011 WikiCup! Your submissions' page can be found here and instructions of how to update the page can be found here and on the submissions' page itself. From the submissions' page, a bot will update the main scoresheet. Our rules have been very slightly updated from last year; the full rules can be found here. Please remember that you can only receive points for content on which you have done significant work in 2011; nominations of work from last year and "drive-by" nominations will not be awarded points. Signups are going to remain open through January, so if you know of anyone who would like to take part, please direct them to Wikipedia:WikiCup/2011 signups. The judges can be contacted on the WikiCup talk page, on their respective talk pages, or by email. Other than that, we will be in contact at the end of every month with the newsletter. If you want to stop or start receiving newsletters, please remove your name from or add your name to this list. Good luck! J Milburn and The ed17 17:56, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Re:My ITN for Sargent Shriver
Anything on which you have done significant work this year which was nominated this year can be claimed. J Milburn (talk) 18:05, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
If I had an itchy trigger finger, I could quite justifiably delete that under CSD A3. You might want to expand it a bit. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:16, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Help me!
{{helpme}}
I need to expand the article 2011 Iraq suicides quick for an ITN. --Perseus, Son of Zeus 20:25, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
[2] is a ref I added, but I need a subscription/registration. --Perseus, Son of Zeus 20:28, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
- You shouldn't be worried about a "quick ITN". It'll be posted (probably by me, hence my keeping at arm's length) when it's good and ready and if there's a consensus, which could take several hours. Btw, I can access that link perfectly, but Google has some 1500 articles on the same series of attacks, so there's no shortage of material. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:59, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Rapid transit in the United States
A tag has been placed on Rapid transit in the United States, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.
If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}}
to the page and state your reasoning on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 23:00, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
On 20 January 2011, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article January 2011 Iraq suicide attacks, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page. |
--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:39, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
Protection of userpage
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Could someone really protect my userpage? Thanks! --Perseus, Son of Zeus ✉ sign here 18:25, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
- In order to have your user page protected, you must request it at Requests for page protection. Logan Talk Contributions 18:46, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
- HJ Mitchell has protected your user page - I have unprotected it. ;) --Addihockey10 e-mail 21:14, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
- I was just kidding by the way :P Keep up your good work! --Addihockey10 e-mail 21:58, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
- HJ Mitchell has protected your user page - I have unprotected it. ;) --Addihockey10 e-mail 21:14, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Rollback
Hello, this is just to let you know that I've granted you Rollback rights. Just remember:
- Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
- Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
- Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
- Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
- Please read Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
- You can test Rollback at Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback
- You may wish to display the {{User wikipedia/rollback}} userbox and/or the {{Rollback}} top icon on your user page
- If you have any questions, please do let me know.
HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:27, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 January 2011
- News and notes: Wikimedia fellow working on cultural collaborations; video animation about Wikipedia; brief news
- WikiProject report: Life Inside the Beltway
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: 23 editors submit evidence in 'Shakespeare' case, Longevity case awaits proposed decision, and more
- Technology report: File licensing metadata; Multimedia Usability project; brief news
Talkback
Message added 20:04, 25 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/vinocc 1
"It's not going to pass" may well be a valid WP:SNOW rationale. It is not, however, a valid CSD rationale. Please do not tag things with criteria for deletion that don't exist. Ironholds (talk) 18:52, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
Percy Jackson character deletion
You don't need to make an AfD nomination for every single character. Just get the consensus from the one AfD. Although alternatively, you could put merge templates on all the pages, and then discuss it on the Percy Jackson project page. AfD is only for deleting articles, not merging them. Requesting for AfD when you KNOW they will be redirected is gaming the system. Blake (Talk·Edits) 19:27, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
I've reverted your move request for this page as it was badly formatted and I could not work out what you actually wanted doing. If (as I suspect) the move you are proposing is uncontroversial you could either do a G6 speedy on the page you want to move it to or list it as uncontroversial at WP:RM. Dpmuk (talk) 21:15, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
Semi-retired
WikiCup 2011 January newsletter
We are half way through round one of the WikiCup. Signups are now closed, and we have 129 listed competitors, 64 of whom will make it to round two. Congratulations to The Bushranger (submissions), who, at the time of writing, has a comfortable lead with 228 points, followed by Hurricanehink (submissions), with 144 points. Four others have over 100 points. Congratulations also go to Yellow Evan (submissions), who scored the first points in the competition, claiming for Talk:Hurricane King/GA1, Miyagawa (submissions), who scored the first non-review points in the competition, claiming for Dognapping, and Jarry1250 (submissions) who was the first in the competition to use our new "multiplier" mechanic (explanation), claiming for Grigory Potemkin, a subject covered on numerous Wikipedias. Thanks must also go to Jarry1250 for dealing with all bot work- without you, the competition wouldn't be happening!
A running total of claims can be seen here. However, numerous competitors are yet to score at all- please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. The number of points that will be needed to reach round two is not clear- everyone needs to get their entries in now to guarantee their places! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 22:40, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 January 2011
- The Science Hall of Fame: Building a pantheon of scientists from Wikipedia and Google Books
- WikiProject report: WikiWarriors
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Evidence in Shakespeare case moves to a close; Longevity case awaits proposed decision; AUSC RfC
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The February 2011 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive has begun!
Get going! The February 2011 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive has begun. Please get started, as the drive aims to wikify over 2,000 articles this month. We're going to need all the firepower we can get, so please remind your friends to join up as well. In case you didn't know, wikification is fairly simple: just add wiki markup, links, and similar formatting. Thanks for joining; we're looking forward to an exciting time this month! Regards, Guoguo12 (talk · contribs), Mono (talk · contribs), Nolelover (talk · contribs), and Sumsum2010 (talk · contribs). |
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 01:06, 2 February 2011 (UTC).
Hey
What is going on what r we talking about? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elana01 (talk • contribs) 17:41, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, I see! You are my friend in real life. Unfortunately, if you keep acting like Wikipedia is a social network, STOP! --Perseus, Son of Zeus ✉ sign here 17:46, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Still here and will soon resume Wikiwork.
This lousy T-shirt has eaten the fried chicken you gave them! The chicken made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more chicken, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the tastiness of fried chicken by adding {{subst:GiveChicken}} to their talk page with a friendly message, or eat chicken with {{subst:MunchChicken}}!!
Thank you
Talkback
/ƒETCHCOMMS/ 17:01, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- I choose b, as it's something new. --Perseus, Son of Zeus ✉ sign here 17:05, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- Post a list of articles after they're all done, ta. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 17:21, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
FYI
{content redacted by user}
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Specifically, WP:ANI#Perseus, Son of Zeus odd behavior?. Syrthiss (talk) 18:33, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- I just went there just before you posted it. --Perseus, Son of Zeus ✉ sign here 18:34, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, just wanted to make sure the requirements were met for notifying you. I had to fix an ec so there was a time delay. Cheers. Syrthiss (talk) 18:36, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- Not to be rude, but may I begin studying for exams now? --Perseus, Son of Zeus ✉ sign here 18:39, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- Nothing rude about that. Good luck with them. Syrthiss (talk) 18:41, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- Not to be rude, but may I begin studying for exams now? --Perseus, Son of Zeus ✉ sign here 18:39, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, just wanted to make sure the requirements were met for notifying you. I had to fix an ec so there was a time delay. Cheers. Syrthiss (talk) 18:36, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
--The UtahraptorTalk/Contribs 22:16, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Blocked
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. TNXMan 22:55, 3 February 2011 (UTC)- Please note this does not mean you are unwelcome, but rather, is meant to protect you. TNXMan 22:55, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Unblock
Perseus, Son of Zeus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not requesting unblock of this account, but my alt account, Theseus, Son of Poseidon. Thanks. --Perseus, Son of Zeus ✉ sign here 23:45, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You'll need to prove that you (the person who registered the accounts) are in control of that account (and/or this one) before I can help you. The easiest way is by email—can you think of any editors in good standing with whom you've had email contact prior to whatever the fuck just happened? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:29, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Um, it seems like your alt account is not blocked. (According to popups) →♠Gƒoley↔Four♣← 00:33, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- There is also User:PSoZ. Perhaps there's an autoblock?—Soap— 00:44, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- But please do change your password! It may have been made public for a while. –anemoneprojectors– 00:47, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- Frankly, I'm inclined to block all three accounts. Someone careless enough to let their account be compromised doesn't need alternate accounts. Someone who needs adopting and mentoring doesn't need alternate accounts. Frankly someone with your skills and maturity doesn't need alternate accounts. I think you should edit from this account only because people recognize the name and know that you need to be watched. --AniMate 01:18, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, that's not really an option - once an account has been blocked (for being compromised), it can't be unblocked. TNXMan 01:26, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- I seem to remember a number of administrators had compromised accounts a while back and most of them were unblocked once their passwords were changed and strengthened. Regardless, I blocked the alternates and you are free to request an unblock there. As always any administrator can reverse my block without asking. --AniMate 01:33, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- Password changed and strengthened. I had three communications with other users by email, but I'll have to prove this. --Perseus, Son of Zeus ✉ sign here 15:32, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- I can't think of any way to prove this is the me as all my email communications are from retired, blocked, unresponsive, or extremely busy users. --Perseus, Son of Zeus ✉ sign here 15:41, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- Password changed and strengthened. I had three communications with other users by email, but I'll have to prove this. --Perseus, Son of Zeus ✉ sign here 15:32, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- I seem to remember a number of administrators had compromised accounts a while back and most of them were unblocked once their passwords were changed and strengthened. Regardless, I blocked the alternates and you are free to request an unblock there. As always any administrator can reverse my block without asking. --AniMate 01:33, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, that's not really an option - once an account has been blocked (for being compromised), it can't be unblocked. TNXMan 01:26, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- Frankly, I'm inclined to block all three accounts. Someone careless enough to let their account be compromised doesn't need alternate accounts. Someone who needs adopting and mentoring doesn't need alternate accounts. Frankly someone with your skills and maturity doesn't need alternate accounts. I think you should edit from this account only because people recognize the name and know that you need to be watched. --AniMate 01:18, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- But please do change your password! It may have been made public for a while. –anemoneprojectors– 00:47, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- There is also User:PSoZ. Perhaps there's an autoblock?—Soap— 00:44, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
{{adminhelp}}
Is there any way to prove this is me after my account was hacked? --Perseus, Son of Zeus ✉ sign here 15:47, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- There is WP:Committed identity, but unfortunately you have to set that up before you get hacked. I think you are going to have to abandon these accounts, register a new clean-start one with a strong password; then you can make a committed identity in case it should happen again. JohnCD (talk) 16:07, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
{{adminhelp}} Um, I am autoblocked so I can't create an account! --Perseus, Son of Zeus ✉ sign here 16:11, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- I'm fairly sure you're you ... but I don't know for sure ... this is confusing. Autoblock removed. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 16:19, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- (e/c) I've disabled the autoblock on the account, so you should be able to create a new one now. Just to add to the above, you should log out if you leave your computer unattended, if it's likely to be hacked by friends/colleagues/family. Committed identity should be a last resort, and it's far bettr to ensure you're not compromised in the first place. — Tivedshambo (t/c) 16:21, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- But...I can't log in now! --173.49.140.141 (talk) 16:22, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- New account Perseus8235 can't stay logged in. --Perseus, Son of Zeus ✉ sign here 16:24, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- If your new account won't stay logged in, try clearing all Wikipedia/Wikimedia cookies from your system and then restart. There has been a help-desk thread about this, but I can't find it; I think that was the recommended solution. Worth trying. JohnCD (talk) 16:59, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- New account Perseus8235 can't stay logged in. --Perseus, Son of Zeus ✉ sign here 16:24, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- But...I can't log in now! --173.49.140.141 (talk) 16:22, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- (e/c) I've disabled the autoblock on the account, so you should be able to create a new one now. Just to add to the above, you should log out if you leave your computer unattended, if it's likely to be hacked by friends/colleagues/family. Committed identity should be a last resort, and it's far bettr to ensure you're not compromised in the first place. — Tivedshambo (t/c) 16:21, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- I think we should get a CU to confirm whether this is Perseus or not. --Addihockey10 e-mail 16:26, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- BTW-a long time ago, I created a fishy-sounding account "TheseusSockPuppet" which is not a sockpuppet, rather an account that was used by a family member. --Perseus, Son of Zeus ✉ sign here 16:27, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- Information on the talk page of that account. --Perseus, Son of Zeus ✉ sign here 16:33, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- CU won't help since I was compromised. --Perseus, Son of Zeus ✉ sign here 16:28, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- CU data might be able to confirm that the right person is controlling the account. Have you changed the password? If not - do so. --Addihockey10 e-mail 16:38, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, I have changed the password to something I can remember, though it's a hard-to-guess combination to guess unless you know tons of details of my personal life. --Perseus, Son of Zeus ✉ sign here 16:39, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- CU data might be able to confirm that the right person is controlling the account. Have you changed the password? If not - do so. --Addihockey10 e-mail 16:38, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- CU won't help since I was compromised. --Perseus, Son of Zeus ✉ sign here 16:28, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
{{helpme}}
How do I clear cookies in Firefox? --Perseus, Son of Zeus ✉ sign here 17:54, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- Tools>Clear Recent History. Click the details box, and uncheck everything except 'cookies'. You probably only need to clear the last day or so if that is it. Syrthiss (talk) 17:58, 4 February 2011 (UTC)