User talk:Paul H./Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Paul H.. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
AfD nomination of Out-of-place artifact
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Out-of-place artifact. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Out-of-place artifact. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Dear Paul
All of these OOPArts have been explained. This is just an article on purported misteries. Regards. --Againme (talk) 16:10, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
KU Student Authors
Hi Paul! I see you've been making some edits in Marine archaeology in the Gulf of Cambay, one of the entries a student of mine has chosen for revision. I think the student has learned some things from this first foray into Wikipedia editing, but please don't be shy about communicating your concerns directly. I'm teaching my "Archaeological Myths & Realities" course again this semester. If you want to follow the Wikipedia assignment, scroll down to the relevant section on my own talk page. Any comments, tips, or suggestions would be greatly appreciated! Hoopes (talk) 21:05, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for contributions to Leonard R. Brand article
Hi Paul, your input on the Leonard R. Brand article is appreciated. I noticed on your user page you mention that you are a geologist. I have a question. An Adventist acquaintance worked for Shell Oil. He said that they used the geologic column and old earth data to help them determine where oil might be located underground. I have often wondered how common is this use of data to find oil. Again, thanks again for your edits. I have just become seeking to improve the article and its helpful to have an additional perspective. DonaldRichardSands (talk) 18:29, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
The geologic column, biostratigraphy, sequence stratigraphy, and other "old earth" data and concepts are an essential and integral part of finding oil and gas. They are quite literally used every minute and second that a geologist explores for oil and gas. For examples go look at books such as 1. "Stratigraphic reservoir characterization for petroleum geologists, geophysicists, and engineers" (Handbook of Petroleum Exploration and Production vol 6) by Roger M. Slatt; 2. "Geomorphology of Oil and Gas Fields in Sandstone Bodies" (Developments in Petroleum Science no. 4) by C. E. B. Conybeare; 3. "Carbonate Reservoirs Porosity Evolution and Diagenesis in a Sequence Stratigraphic Framework" (Developments in Sedimentology no. 55) by Clyde R. Moore; 4. "Biostratigraphy Microfossils and Geological Time" by BrianN McGowran; 5. "Giant Hydrocarbon Reservoirs of the World: From Rocks to Reservoir Characterization and Modeling" by Paul Mitchell Harris, L. James Weber; and many other books and publications on this subject.Paul H. (talk) 02:51, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
When you're ready to nominate this drivel for deletion, let me know and I'll lend my support. --Taivo (talk) 22:37, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is hereby awarded for your good work in creating useful stubs such as Granule (geology) and Cobble (geology). I created the Cobble redirect (and pointed several ambiguous links at it) in the hopes that someone would come along and put an article there. Thanks for picking up the ball and running with it. Nick Number (talk) 15:19, 29 August 2011 (UTC) |
See my
talk page Dougweller (talk) 20:05, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Weblinks on Location hypotheses of Atlantis
Hello, you restored two weblinks, I removed recently. Well, fine, there is a talk ongoing, it would be very kind of you to go to talk page of Location hypotheses of Atlantis and discuss this?
Secondly, since you have an opinion which weblinks are valuable and which not, I would appreciate to know your idea concerning the pages suggested to be added in the discussion of the talk page of Location hypotheses of Atlantis ("Suggestions to add pages").
Thanks in advance! --Thorwald C. Franke (talk) 15:57, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Redirects and piped links
Hi, for interest, just in case you weren't aware on it, this edit to Eberswalde (crater) wasn't strictly necessary. There is a redirect from relief inversion to Inverted relief (see redirects here and this is the redirect page), so the piped link 'inverted relief|relief inversion' isn't required, not that it matters much. :) See Wikipedia:Piped link. Sean.hoyland - talk 18:02, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Have you seen the fracas there? I'd suggest not getting involved with the arguments about editors (one editor was blocked for revealing someone's name, for instance, and there seems to be some off-wiki problems). Dougweller (talk) 14:37, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Barrington Tops - mountains
Dear Paul H,
Thank you for editing my recent series of articles on the mountains of the Barrington Tops.
Poyt448 (talk) 06:41, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Merge discussion for Marine terrace
An article that you have been involved in editing, Marine terrace , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. — Foldo Squirrel (nuts?) 19:42, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Ica stones report
Hi. Three months ago you wrote on the Ica Stones talk page "in personal communications with some archaeologists I have been told about an official report prepared by the Peruvian government regarding their investigations of the Ica Stones, which concluded specifically that they were modern forgeries. ... I have not been able yet to obtain a copy of this report". I wonder if you've had any success with this, as I'd still be very interested to see it, or even just to know what its precise title is. SamuelTheGhost (talk) 13:14, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I have not made much progress. To actually track it down, including getting an exact title will take someone, who can read and speak Spanish fluently. I cannot do either and Google translations cannot substitute for lacking such abilities. I will have to find someone, who is fluent in both written and spoken Spanish and has some spare time on their hands. Paul H. (talk) 02:59, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- OK, thanks for your reply. I can read Spanish well enough to understand what such a report is saying, but no more than that. But please keep trying, as a favour to me and to wikipedia (though the latter doesn't do gratitude!). SamuelTheGhost (talk) 11:25, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
I speak fluent Spanish and would love to see any evidence or scientific studies done in Peru or elsewhere about the Ica Stones. What is the name of this archaeologist you talked to? Do you have his Email? A URL perhaps? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justthefactsabout (talk • contribs) 17:43, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Howdy
Paul, I'm kind of a middle man here: you may know a colleague of mine, {[user|Twinemi1}}, also formerly at LSU. He's just getting started on Wikipedia. I told him about you, but had little more to say than what I got from your user page. Happy days, Drmies (talk) 15:15, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Assessment template
Hi Paul H! I just saw that changed the assessment template from Cambrian to Precambrian. I don't think that will do anything because that part of the template was just for the Cambrian task force. I will just remove those two lines from the assessment template. --Tobias1984 (talk) 16:21, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Editor's Barnstar |
| on Bass Formation -- excellent work! Lockley (talk) 06:45, 22 January 2013 (UTC) |
The Unkar Group
As for the Unkar Group, Grand Canyon region, I want to thank you. I offer (invisible) Cookies, or Guinness Brew, mug or glass. I want you to know, that I appreciate the opportunity to make my final edits to your latest article—Dox Formation. (I was at the library, 5-blocks distant, not my computer, and doing links to White Rim Sandstone....and the Dox Formation came up in my article search)....so.... here I am.
Editing your complex articles, ....are equivalent to complex Mesopotamian, Babylonian-king, or mythology articles, with quotes, that need re-reading, and grammatical pauses, either for Emphasis, or Understanding. (User:BigEars42)... It took about 1.5 months to catch up to his articles, now into the kudurrus of the kings, leaders, officials, etc.
I got to the Grand Canyon (through Wikicommons), after mountain range and valley creation. After AZ, then N.MEX, some Nevada,...I concentrated on Utah (all the ranges/VALLEYs west of the Wasatch Front, Wasatch Range), or others. They were the subset in Wikicommons of my creation of Colorado Plateau in Utah; I had started on all 4 states, I live in AZ, so I knew more of AZ. But when I continued in Wikicommons, for the Utah sections, (and the High Plateaus section of the Colorado Plateau)... I ended up at the Grand Canyon. ...saw all the photos (380+ Grand Canyon, 85+ in Grand Canyon Nat'l Park), with no separation into GEOLOGY SUBCategories... so that is how I arrived at Grand Canyon-(It was 2 and 1/2 Months of Category Creation))... ((my latest efforts were for the Abo Formation, Hermit Formation, and coeval Organ Rock Formation...see [1], the "skirts" of the Organ Rock, below De Chelly Sandstone, in Monument Valley))...
What is kind of amazing in Wikipedia... is that we (as Humans) create. we see something, then we turn to it, and work at it. (On TV, Jeff Probst Show), a 25-yr old young lady, started leaving anonymous letters (as her Mom, and GrandMom did).. What I got from it is her words: "Presence", Connection, and "Intensity"...(Robert Frost, poet: 'Education by presesce', or the Apache saying: "I am what I do")... So your completion of Number 5 of 5, is wonderful. I hope you understand my editing, of Your wonderful and complex articles.
(My addendum statement: Rules, should be self-apparent, (even for the Young/and...or/Misguided, they should pass the (duh!? test)
(2nd Addendum), the Blakey, and Ranney Ancient Landscapes, of the Colorado Plateau, has the offshore "island arc" of SW North America, when the Unkar Basin was doing its thing. I saw......... on WikiCommons the subset of the World Geology/Continental PaleoMaps, named for Blakey-(about 20 Files, I used one.). (from the HotSonoranDesert, ArizonaUSA)....Mmcannis (talk) 15:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
In response to your message about pasting text
Yes I did paste text into the Ica Stones page, but it was not copied from an article I had found. It was copied from my own word file On my computer. I edited the text myself on Wikipedia and saved changes, but every time I changed it, someone would change it back (Paul H?) A few hours later. I felt is was unfair as the articles I had based my facts on had good reference material in them which I included. So to save time I just copied the Wikipedia text into a MS Word document after I had edited it and saved it, since I knew I would have to go back to the page the next day and change it again. I think this is developing into an info war. Perhaps as a compromise what I'll do is create my own section instead of editing the existing one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justthefactsabout (talk • contribs) 17:38, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Infobox rock unit and Wikidata
Hi Paul H.! I saw your recent edit of the infobox rock unit. I was also thinking of adding that kind of information to the infobox. I am currently working to store that kind of information on Wikidata and then make a new infobox that pulls the data directly from there. An example would be d:Q7684515 or d:Q1554536. If you would like to help me you can look at d:Wikidata:Stratigraphy_task_force. --Tobias1984 (talk) 16:57, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Rutan Hill
Just wanted to thank you for the considerable expansion of material at Rutan Hill. Between the work you've added today and the work Lithium6ion offered a few weeks ago, I've learned quite a bit the uniqueness of the site which is only a few miles away. (I'm aiming to drive up that way to add a photo or two...is there anything specific about the site that you think should be photographed?--ColonelHenry (talk) 23:25, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Glacial ages
Hi Paul, If this graphic is mislabeled, let's fix the labels. The ice-core dates are real, and help me see where the glacial periods fit. And if this graphic isn't helpful for you, perhaps you can suggest a better one? Tom Ruen (talk) 02:54, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- File:Co2_glacial_cycles_800k.png
- I now see your discussion at: File_talk:Co2_glacial_cycles_800k.png. Tom Ruen (talk) 02:57, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Spratlys
Thanks for your work on the geology of the Spratlys! I knew from my reading that the volcanic claim was wrong, but I don't know enough geology to contribute to that section of the article. You obviously know your stuff. --Macrakis (talk) 05:14, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the insight on pellets and peloids
Thanks for improving the content of the pellets page! I was clearly mistaken about the terms being synonyms. All the same, do you think that it would be worth merging the two into one more complete article? Thanks again! Rygel, M.C. (talk) 14:41, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your efforts!
|
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| Your name came up on a Wikipediocracy thread about solid content writers who don't get the credit they deserve and I just wanted to drop by and do a little of that. Thanks for your work on behalf of The Project! Carrite (talk) 17:20, 30 March 2014 (UTC) |
Zenith Plateau
Hi, I found this article via your link from MH730. It's not anything I know about, and a long way from home in England, but it looks interesting! Do you have any figures for the size of the plateau e.g. in sq. miles?
- I do. I will be adding that information and additional stuff later this evening. Paul H. (talk) 22:11, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Also, I am thinking about to preparing figures using the available bathymetric digital elevation models. Paul H. (talk) 23:31, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Persian Gulf flood
As reverted by not being and outburst flood, you could include in the Persian Gulf page a chapter about Geology (it's blocked). Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nekurant (talk • contribs) 06:45, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Out-of-place artifact
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Out-of-place artifact. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Out-of-place artifact. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Dear Paul
All of these OOPArts have been explained. This is just an article on purported misteries. Regards. --Againme (talk) 16:10, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
KU Student Authors
Hi Paul! I see you've been making some edits in Marine archaeology in the Gulf of Cambay, one of the entries a student of mine has chosen for revision. I think the student has learned some things from this first foray into Wikipedia editing, but please don't be shy about communicating your concerns directly. I'm teaching my "Archaeological Myths & Realities" course again this semester. If you want to follow the Wikipedia assignment, scroll down to the relevant section on my own talk page. Any comments, tips, or suggestions would be greatly appreciated! Hoopes (talk) 21:05, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for contributions to Leonard R. Brand article
Hi Paul, your input on the Leonard R. Brand article is appreciated. I noticed on your user page you mention that you are a geologist. I have a question. An Adventist acquaintance worked for Shell Oil. He said that they used the geologic column and old earth data to help them determine where oil might be located underground. I have often wondered how common is this use of data to find oil. Again, thanks again for your edits. I have just become seeking to improve the article and its helpful to have an additional perspective. DonaldRichardSands (talk) 18:29, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
The geologic column, biostratigraphy, sequence stratigraphy, and other "old earth" data and concepts are an essential and integral part of finding oil and gas. They are quite literally used every minute and second that a geologist explores for oil and gas. For examples go look at books such as 1. "Stratigraphic reservoir characterization for petroleum geologists, geophysicists, and engineers" (Handbook of Petroleum Exploration and Production vol 6) by Roger M. Slatt; 2. "Geomorphology of Oil and Gas Fields in Sandstone Bodies" (Developments in Petroleum Science no. 4) by C. E. B. Conybeare; 3. "Carbonate Reservoirs Porosity Evolution and Diagenesis in a Sequence Stratigraphic Framework" (Developments in Sedimentology no. 55) by Clyde R. Moore; 4. "Biostratigraphy Microfossils and Geological Time" by BrianN McGowran; 5. "Giant Hydrocarbon Reservoirs of the World: From Rocks to Reservoir Characterization and Modeling" by Paul Mitchell Harris, L. James Weber; and many other books and publications on this subject.Paul H. (talk) 02:51, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
When you're ready to nominate this drivel for deletion, let me know and I'll lend my support. --Taivo (talk) 22:37, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar
|
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is hereby awarded for your good work in creating useful stubs such as Granule (geology) and Cobble (geology). I created the Cobble redirect (and pointed several ambiguous links at it) in the hopes that someone would come along and put an article there. Thanks for picking up the ball and running with it. Nick Number (talk) 15:19, 29 August 2011 (UTC) |
See my
talk page Dougweller (talk) 20:05, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Weblinks on Location hypotheses of Atlantis
Hello, you restored two weblinks, I removed recently. Well, fine, there is a talk ongoing, it would be very kind of you to go to talk page of Location hypotheses of Atlantis and discuss this?
Secondly, since you have an opinion which weblinks are valuable and which not, I would appreciate to know your idea concerning the pages suggested to be added in the discussion of the talk page of Location hypotheses of Atlantis ("Suggestions to add pages").
Thanks in advance! --Thorwald C. Franke (talk) 15:57, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Redirects and piped links
Hi, for interest, just in case you weren't aware on it, this edit to Eberswalde (crater) wasn't strictly necessary. There is a redirect from relief inversion to Inverted relief (see redirects here and this is the redirect page), so the piped link 'inverted relief|relief inversion' isn't required, not that it matters much. :) See Wikipedia:Piped link. Sean.hoyland - talk 18:02, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Have you seen the fracas there? I'd suggest not getting involved with the arguments about editors (one editor was blocked for revealing someone's name, for instance, and there seems to be some off-wiki problems). Dougweller (talk) 14:37, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Barrington Tops - mountains
Dear Paul H,
Thank you for editing my recent series of articles on the mountains of the Barrington Tops.
Poyt448 (talk) 06:41, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Merge discussion for Marine terrace
An article that you have been involved in editing, Marine terrace , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. — Foldo Squirrel (nuts?) 19:42, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Ica stones report
Hi. Three months ago you wrote on the Ica Stones talk page "in personal communications with some archaeologists I have been told about an official report prepared by the Peruvian government regarding their investigations of the Ica Stones, which concluded specifically that they were modern forgeries. ... I have not been able yet to obtain a copy of this report". I wonder if you've had any success with this, as I'd still be very interested to see it, or even just to know what its precise title is. SamuelTheGhost (talk) 13:14, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I have not made much progress. To actually track it down, including getting an exact title will take someone, who can read and speak Spanish fluently. I cannot do either and Google translations cannot substitute for lacking such abilities. I will have to find someone, who is fluent in both written and spoken Spanish and has some spare time on their hands. Paul H. (talk) 02:59, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- OK, thanks for your reply. I can read Spanish well enough to understand what such a report is saying, but no more than that. But please keep trying, as a favour to me and to wikipedia (though the latter doesn't do gratitude!). SamuelTheGhost (talk) 11:25, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
I speak fluent Spanish and would love to see any evidence or scientific studies done in Peru or elsewhere about the Ica Stones. What is the name of this archaeologist you talked to? Do you have his Email? A URL perhaps? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justthefactsabout (talk • contribs) 17:43, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Howdy
Paul, I'm kind of a middle man here: you may know a colleague of mine, {[user|Twinemi1}}, also formerly at LSU. He's just getting started on Wikipedia. I told him about you, but had little more to say than what I got from your user page. Happy days, Drmies (talk) 15:15, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Assessment template
Hi Paul H! I just saw that changed the assessment template from Cambrian to Precambrian. I don't think that will do anything because that part of the template was just for the Cambrian task force. I will just remove those two lines from the assessment template. --Tobias1984 (talk) 16:21, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
|
The Editor's Barnstar |
| on Bass Formation -- excellent work! Lockley (talk) 06:45, 22 January 2013 (UTC) |
The Unkar Group
As for the Unkar Group, Grand Canyon region, I want to thank you. I offer (invisible) Cookies, or Guinness Brew, mug or glass. I want you to know, that I appreciate the opportunity to make my final edits to your latest article—Dox Formation. (I was at the library, 5-blocks distant, not my computer, and doing links to White Rim Sandstone....and the Dox Formation came up in my article search)....so.... here I am.
Editing your complex articles, ....are equivalent to complex Mesopotamian, Babylonian-king, or mythology articles, with quotes, that need re-reading, and grammatical pauses, either for Emphasis, or Understanding. (User:BigEars42)... It took about 1.5 months to catch up to his articles, now into the kudurrus of the kings, leaders, officials, etc.
I got to the Grand Canyon (through Wikicommons), after mountain range and valley creation. After AZ, then N.MEX, some Nevada,...I concentrated on Utah (all the ranges/VALLEYs west of the Wasatch Front, Wasatch Range), or others. They were the subset in Wikicommons of my creation of Colorado Plateau in Utah; I had started on all 4 states, I live in AZ, so I knew more of AZ. But when I continued in Wikicommons, for the Utah sections, (and the High Plateaus section of the Colorado Plateau)... I ended up at the Grand Canyon. ...saw all the photos (380+ Grand Canyon, 85+ in Grand Canyon Nat'l Park), with no separation into GEOLOGY SUBCategories... so that is how I arrived at Grand Canyon-(It was 2 and 1/2 Months of Category Creation))... ((my latest efforts were for the Abo Formation, Hermit Formation, and coeval Organ Rock Formation...see [2], the "skirts" of the Organ Rock, below De Chelly Sandstone, in Monument Valley))...
What is kind of amazing in Wikipedia... is that we (as Humans) create. we see something, then we turn to it, and work at it. (On TV, Jeff Probst Show), a 25-yr old young lady, started leaving anonymous letters (as her Mom, and GrandMom did).. What I got from it is her words: "Presence", Connection, and "Intensity"...(Robert Frost, poet: 'Education by presensce', or the Apache saying: "I am what I do")... So your completion of Number 5 of 5, is wonderful. I hope you understand my editing, of Your wonderful and complex articles.
(My addendum statement: Rules, should be self-apparent, (even for the Young/and...or/Misguided, they should pass the (duh!? test)))
(2nd Addendum), the Blakey, and Ranney Ancient Landscapes, of the Colorado Plateau, has the offshore "island arc" of SW North America, when the Unkar Basin was doing its thing. I saw......... on WikiCommons the subset of the World Geology/Continental PaleoMaps, named for Blakey-(about 20 Files, I used one.). (from the HotSonoranDesert, ArizonaUSA)....Mmcannis (talk) 15:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
In response to your message about pasting text
Yes I did paste text into the Ica Stones page, but it was not copied from an article I had found. It was copied from my own word file On my computer. I edited the text myself on Wikipedia and saved changes, but every time I changed it, someone would change it back (Paul H?) A few hours later. I felt is was unfair as the articles I had based my facts on had good reference material in them which I included. So to save time I just copied the Wikipedia text into a MS Word document after I had edited it and saved it, since I knew I would have to go back to the page the next day and change it again. I think this is developing into an info war. Perhaps as a compromise what I'll do is create my own section instead of editing the existing one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justthefactsabout (talk • contribs) 17:38, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Infobox rock unit and Wikidata
Hi Paul H.! I saw your recent edit of the infobox rock unit. I was also thinking of adding that kind of information to the infobox. I am currently working to store that kind of information on Wikidata and then make a new infobox that pulls the data directly from there. An example would be d:Q7684515 or d:Q1554536. If you would like to help me you can look at d:Wikidata:Stratigraphy_task_force. --Tobias1984 (talk) 16:57, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Rutan Hill
Just wanted to thank you for the considerable expansion of material at Rutan Hill. Between the work you've added today and the work Lithium6ion offered a few weeks ago, I've learned quite a bit the uniqueness of the site which is only a few miles away. (I'm aiming to drive up that way to add a photo or two...is there anything specific about the site that you think should be photographed?--ColonelHenry (talk) 23:25, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Glacial ages
Hi Paul, If this graphic is mislabeled, let's fix the labels. The ice-core dates are real, and help me see where the glacial periods fit. And if this graphic isn't helpful for you, perhaps you can suggest a better one? Tom Ruen (talk) 02:54, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- File:Co2_glacial_cycles_800k.png
- I now see your discussion at: File_talk:Co2_glacial_cycles_800k.png. Tom Ruen (talk) 02:57, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Spratlys
Thanks for your work on the geology of the Spratlys! I knew from my reading that the volcanic claim was wrong, but I don't know enough geology to contribute to that section of the article. You obviously know your stuff. --Macrakis (talk) 05:14, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the insight on pellets and peloids
Thanks for improving the content of the pellets page! I was clearly mistaken about the terms being synonyms. All the same, do you think that it would be worth merging the two into one more complete article? Thanks again! Rygel, M.C. (talk) 14:41, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your efforts!
|
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| Your name came up on a Wikipediocracy thread about solid content writers who don't get the credit they deserve and I just wanted to drop by and do a little of that. Thanks for your work on behalf of The Project! Carrite (talk) 17:20, 30 March 2014 (UTC) |
Zenith Plateau
Hi, I found this article via your link from MH730. It's not anything I know about, and a long way from home in England, but it looks interesting! Do you have any figures for the size of the plateau e.g. in sq. miles?
- I do. I will be adding that information and additional stuff later this evening. Paul H. (talk) 22:11, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Also, I am thinking about to preparing figures using the available bathymetric digital elevation models. Paul H. (talk) 23:31, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Persian Gulf flood
As reverted by not being and outburst flood, you could include in the Persian Gulf page a chapter about Geology (it's blocked). Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nekurant (talk • contribs) 06:45, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Julie K. Stein / List of Archaeologists
Hello,
For the list of prominent archaeologists, we generally follow a Wikipedia pattern in which the person should have her or his own Wikipedia entry. When we make exceptions, we have external references (links, books about the people, obits etc.) that show the person's prominence. Could You please supply one or the other, lest Professor Stein's name gets removed again. Also, try to give DoB and nationality in the format used as well as her specialties. KD
Puma Punku
Thanks. That was copyvio from [3]. Not sure if any of it is useful in the article? Dougweller (talk) 20:29, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- I agree that there is nothing useful in that article. In addition, I belatedly noted the copyvio in the editor's talk page at User talk:2607:FB90:1803:3382:7D27:DF72:5BBF:917E. Paul H. (talk) 21:37, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Can your offline sources verify a hunch?
Hey Paul H., I really appreciated your in-depth edits re: the early history of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, especially concerning the Paiute. I was wondering if your offline sources could confirm a hunch: That the "brief uprising in 1878" refers to the Bannock War, and that the "reservation" they were forced to leave was the Malheur Indian Reservation. This is almost certainly the case if you trust the contents of those articles, which are sourced - but the relevant references there are also offline. I limited my wording to the vague wording of the only online source I had available (admittedly poor, but I was alarmed at how bare-boned the article was while it was in the spotlight). Again, thanks! Antepenultimate (talk) 05:26, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
I apologize for not adding more from these references, but I have been busy at work and not had time to digest all that I have found. Yes, your hunch is right. The brief uprising in 1878 does refer to the Bannock War and that the reservation that they were forced to leave was the Malheur Indian Reservation. One interesting circumstance that I found is that peace treaty to Bannock War the was not ratified by Congress and the Burns Paiute Tribe did not cede any of its rights in their ancestral territory. Thus, the land transfer from the Burns Paiute Tribe to the federal government was defacto, not dejure in nature. Paul H. (talk) 06:06, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking a look and adding the info, and for any future details you add as well. Nice to get some in-depth information from sources that weren't on a deadline! - Antepenultimate (talk) 00:19, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Thanks
For the steady attention to expanding the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge article. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 09:12, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Younger Dryas Impact Revisions
Quote: Another problem is that Mr. Davias argues the alleged impact event predated the start of the Younger Dryas by tens of thousands of years. Paul H. (talk) 18:20, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Michael Davias only changed his dating to suit the geological consensus, because he was told he was being contentious in claiming a link between the Carolina Bays and the Y.D. So now you criticise him for agreeing not to be so contentious? Rather than looking down your nose at Davias and claiming 'not peer reviewed', why not try reviewing his material and telling us exactly what you think is wrong with it. Come on, what is wrong with the detailed research and explanations that have been made? Tatelyle (talk) 09:54, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- For the past few months, have been thinking of doing just that. However, reviewing Davias' research would involved original research that is not permitted in an encyclopedia like Wikipedia. I have to get it published in another venue that is acceptable to Wikipedia. Finally, if Davias is stating 800,000 BP, this value has to be taken at face value and the reasons for it cannot be second-guessed in Wikipedia without some source that explicitly states that suiting the geological consensus is the specific reason for that date. Unsupported speculation is not appropriate to Wikipedia Paul H. (talk) 12:04, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- I do hope you will.
- Regards the date of the bays, Davias started with the YD but was convinced by the 'consensus' carbon and thermoluminescence dating that the bays had to be older than this. He quotes Soller on the following web-page saying: "the date of Carolina bay formation falls somewhere between roughly 100 and 200 ka". He does not mention 800 ka on his website, as far as I can see. But it is difficult to keep a website up to date when you are self-funded, have to do another job, and have no undergrads to help out. Please see: http://cintos.org/SaginawManifold/OSL_Proposal/index.html
- But this orthodox dating of the Bays creates a problem for Davias. In private correspondence with myself he said he was looking for a large climatic event prior to the orthodox 150 ka dating and also equate with an impact theory, which was causing problems. He went for the mid-Pleistocene transition, but personally I think that is wrong. I prefer Ellis' idea of a match to the YD climatic cooling and megafauna extinction event, but that means defying the august body of academic opinion and turns a mocked outsider into a shunned leper.
- So you will not allow Ellis to be published either, even though his other paper on ice ages has gone for peer review at the Royal Society (see his facebook site). But you will allow me to champion Firestone's paper, which is clearly inferior. Firestone did not allow for coriolis and Earth drift angle deviations, and then said that the 4 psi pressure wave from the primary impact caused the Bay formations. None of this accords with reality, but Firestone is still 'approved'. Which represents a great failing within the peer-review process. http://journalofcosmology.com/Extinction105.html 09:22, 6 February 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tatelyle (talk • contribs)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Paul H.. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
WP:BURDEN
I wasn't suggesting that you said anything wrong :) I was just pointing out that that conspiracy theorist was actually asking the wrong question entirely; it's their responsibility to demonstrate that a source is reliable (that is, sources are not "presumptively reliable" until proven otherwise) before we use it, and so the burden is on them to demonstrate that there is a consensus that "Aceloewgold.com" is a reliable source... of course, they'll never be able to do that because it isn't one :) NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 04:21, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
Books and Bytes - Issue 20
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 20, November-December 2016
by Nikkimaria (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs), Samwalton9 (talk · contribs)
- Partner resource expansions
- New search tool for finding TWL resources
- #1lib1ref 2017
- Wikidata Visiting Scholar
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Books and Bytes - Issue 21
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 21, January-March 2017
by Nikkimaria (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs), Samwalton9 (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)
- #1lib1ref 2017
- Wikipedia Library User Group
- Wikipedia + Libraries at Wikimedia Conference 2017
- Spotlight: Library Card Platform
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Books and Bytes - Issue 22
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 22, April-May 2017
- New and expanded research accounts
- Global branches update
- Spotlight: OCLC Partnership
- Bytes in brief
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
You've got mail
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Sciencebookworm (talk) 16:55, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Books and Bytes - Issue 23
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 23, June-July 2017
- Library card
- User Group update
- Global branches update
- Spotlight: Combating misinformation, fake news, and censorship
- Bytes in brief
Chinese, Arabic and Yoruba versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:04, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Books and Bytes - Issue 24
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 24, August-September 2017
- User Group update
- Global branches update
- Star Coordinator Award - last quarter's star coordinator: User:Csisc
- Wikimania Birds of a Feather session roundup
- Spotlight: Wiki Loves Archives
- Bytes in brief
Arabic, Kiswahili and Yoruba versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:53, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Paul H.. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Books and Bytes - Issue 25
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 25, October – November 2017
- OAWiki & #1Lib1Ref
- User Group update
- Global branches update
- Spotlight: Research libraries and Wikimedia
- Bytes in brief
Arabic, Korean and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
HNY
.jpg)
|
Happy New Year! Best wishes for 2018, —PaleoNeonate – 01:54, 30 December 2017 (UTC) |
Books and Bytes - Issue 26
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 26, December – January 2018
- #1Lib1Ref
- User Group update
- Global branches update
- Spotlight: What can we glean from OCLC’s experience with library staff learning Wikipedia?
- Bytes in brief
Arabic and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes - Issue 27
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 27, February – March 2018
- #1Lib1Ref
- New collections
- Alexander Street (expansion)
- Cambridge University Press (expansion)
- User Group
- Global branches update
- Wiki Indaba Wikipedia + Library Discussions
- Spotlight: Using librarianship to create a more equitable internet: LGBTQ+ advocacy as a wiki-librarian
- Bytes in brief
Arabic, Chinese and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:50, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 28
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 28, April – May 2018
- #1Bib1Ref
- New partners
- User Group update
- Global branches update
- Wikipedia Library global coordinators' meeting
- Spotlight: What are the ten most cited sources on Wikipedia? Let's ask the data
- Bytes in brief
Arabic, Chinese, Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:33, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 29
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 29, June – July 2018
- New partners
- Economic & Political Weekly–10 accounts
- Wikimania
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Archives
Hello Paul H. I noticed your edit summary about archives not working, but then also saw that there does not appear to be a bot directive to automatically archive. Did you intend to setup automatic archival? If so, I volunteer to help. The template you edited only affects links to archives and the text, but not archival itself. —PaleoNeonate – 08:29, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, I did intend to setup automatic archival. I would appreciate any help that you can provide. Paul H. (talk) 13:36, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- I think that what I added should work, feel free to adjust its parameters (more information is available at User:Lowercase sigmabot III/Archive HowTo#Parameters explained). —PaleoNeonate – 03:02, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for the help. Paul H. (talk) 23:09, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
- You're most welcome, —PaleoNeonate – 00:34, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for the help. Paul H. (talk) 23:09, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
- I think that what I added should work, feel free to adjust its parameters (more information is available at User:Lowercase sigmabot III/Archive HowTo#Parameters explained). —PaleoNeonate – 03:02, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
Fixing or eliminating redirects
Hi Paul, I thought you should know that fixing or eliminating redirects is not needed, and is in fact frowned upon. Please read WP:NOTBROKEN for more information. DuncanHill (talk) 20:35, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
I am sorry. I did not know that fixing redirects is frowmned upon. I missed that :-( :-( Paul H. (talk) 20:39, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
- That's OK - I don't think you've done any harm, but you can save a bit of time not having to worry about fixing any more. All the best, DuncanHill (talk) 20:54, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for the heads up. They are always appreciated. Paul H. (talk) 20:57, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lacq gas field, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portland Group (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited River Nidd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magnesian limestone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes, Issue 33
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 33, March – April 2019
- #1Lib1Ref
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes Issue 34, May – June 2019
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 34, May – June 2019
- Partnerships
- #1Lib1Ref
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:21, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sabkha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saline (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the WP:DRN regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Talk:Yonaguni Monument#Rough_cleanup".The discussion is about the topic Yonaguni Monument. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Melkov (talk) 21:28, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Big Rock
Are you sure that your academic source claims Big Rock as the "largest glacial erratic in the world"? I am unable to find the full text of the article freely available online, but the summary and references shown here indicate that the paper referenced here: (cannot insert link because suite101(dot)com is blacklisted: www(dot)suite101(dot)com/content/the-legend-of-napi-and-the-rock-a36329 which you'll need to search the Wayback machine to find) which mentions the Okotoks Erratic (i.e. Big Rock) as the largest glacial erratic in a particular region, but not in the world. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:41, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, I am sure that Sterenberg (2013) claims Big Rock as the "largest glacial erratic in the world." On page 99, the paper specifically states:
This choice was shaped by historical connections of the Blackfoot community to this place. Located west of Okotoks, Alberta, the Big Rock is the largest glacial erratic2 in the world and is part of a series of boulders stretching from Jasper to Montana. This site was significant to the Blackfoot community and the splitting of the Big Rock by Napi’s actions is a story still told today (Humble 2007)3:
- The footnotes are:
2 A glacial erratic is a rock that is different from the rock in the area and is believed to have been carried and deposited by glacial ice.
3 This is a version of the story as told by Blackfoot elder Stan Knowlton.
- In addition, the Big Rock Erratic article in Atlas Obscura states:
This massive and unusual rock formation near Okotoks is the world's largest known glacial erratic
- Reference
- Sterenberg, G., 2013. Learning Indigenous and Western mathematics from place. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25(1), pp.91-108. Paul H. (talk) 14:29, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the clarification. It seems an odd claim for Steinberg to make given the ease with which the claim is debunked. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 23:45, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 35, July – August 2019
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 35, July – August 2019
- Wikimania
- We're building something great, but..
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- A Wikibrarian's story
- Bytes in brief
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:58, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Books & Bytes – Issue 36
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 36, September – October 2019
- #1Lib1Ref January 2020
- #1Lib1Ref 2019 stories and learnings
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:21, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Whakaari/White Island article title RM notice
You recently participated in a discussion on the title of the Whakaari/White Island article. I have made a formal WP:RM request at Talk:Whakaari/White Island if you care to weigh in. — AjaxSmack 17:47, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 37
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 37, November – December 2019
- #1Lib1Ref
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:10, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Issue 38, January – April 2020
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 38, January – April 2020
- New partnership
- Global roundup
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Sangamonian stage translation
Dear User, I'm writing with reference to the article "Sangamonian", whose you are a contributor. I'm trying to improve the Italian translation of the article and I kindly ask you to assist me in understanding some parts of the text. The parts are as follows:
- "In its typical and broadest usage, the Sangamonian Stage is equivalent to all of Marine isotope stage 5 between 75,000 and 125,000 BP. Although it includes the same time span, the Sangamonian Stage (sensu lato) is not temporally equivalent to the Eemian in Europe." Could I translate this part as "In its typical and broadest usage in North America, the Sangamonian Stage is equivalent to all of Marine isotope stage 5 between 75,000 and 125,000 BP and it corresponds to Riss-Wurm interglacial, while in its much less common usage in North America and in its typical usage in Europe it corresponds to the Eemian"?
- "Unlike Europe, the development of ice sheets in Canada was limited during Marine Isotope Substages 5b, 5c, and 5b and either completely disappeared or were greatly reduced in size during Marine Isotope Substage 5a." Could it be corrected by translating it as "Unlike Europe, the development of ice sheets in Canada was limited during Marine Isotope Substages 5b, 5c, and 5d and either completely disappeared or were greatly reduced in size during Marine Isotope Substage 5a."?
- "Although originally described from water wells in northwestern Sangamon County, Illinois". Does this part suggest water sources or mechanical drilling?
Look forward your reply.
Thank you.
Yours faithfully
Rben80 (talk) 15:53, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- Yes for the first two questions. For the last question, "water wells" refers to descriptions made by the drillers of recovered sediment during the mechanical drilling of the water wells. Paul H. (talk) 03:25, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- Many thanks for your efforts at translation the article. Such work is always appreciated. Paul H. (talk) 03:31, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 39, May – June 2020
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 39, May – June 2020
- Library Card Platform
- New partnerships
- ProQuest
- Springer Nature
- BioOne
- CEEOL
- IWA Publishing
- ICE Publishing
- Bytes in brief
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:13, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lake Nipigon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rare earth.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 40
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 40, July – August 2020
- New partnerships
- Al Manhal
- Ancestry
- RILM
- #1Lib1Ref May 2020 report
- AfLIA hires a Wikipedian-in-Residence
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Douglas Lake Member, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conglomerate.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:11, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tesnus, Texas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spicule.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:33, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 41
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 41, September – October 2020
- New partnership: Taxmann
- WikiCite
- 1Lib1Ref 2021
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:48, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Books & Bytes - Issue 42
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 42, November – December 2020
- New EBSCO collections now available
- 1Lib1Ref 2021 underway
- Library Card input requested
- Libraries love Wikimedia, too!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Douglas Lake Member, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conglomerate.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 42
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 42, January – February 2021
- New partnerships: PNAS, De Gruyter, Nomos
- 1Lib1Ref
- Library Card
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:27, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 43
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 43, March – April 2021
- New Library Card designs
- 1Lib1Ref May
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:11, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Fringe theory claims regarding material science section in Pumapunku article
You have recently claimed in the Fringe theories noticeboard that the material science section I added to the Pumapunku article is based on a fringe theory.
You have characterized the situation as if it the publications I cited were some sort of independent research by the same 3 people.
These papers are published in relevant journals in their field, and have been cited by other researchers.
Most importantly, they were able to reproduce the materials in a laboratory, making it reproducible research rather than speculative archeology.
Is it too hard to believe that some people developed a way to make a strong form of concrete?
Retinoblastoma (talk) 07:36, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 45
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 45, May – June 2021
- Library design improvements continue
- New partnerships
- 1Lib1Ref update
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:04, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Siliceous earth / Wellheim formation: new article?
Hello Paul H.
Would you help me with creating an article to preserve the informative parts of Neuburg siliceous earth?
I feel safe about the technical side and WP rules concerning article creation, but I'm not knowledgeable at all about mineralogy and have no (peer reviewed) sources available.
At the moment I'd prefer to start with Siliceous earth as it has a broader scope than the much more specific Wellheim Formation, I think. --ΟΥΤΙΣ (talk) 23:06, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, I can help. We can start with Siliceous earth. I will have to see what I can find about siliceous earths. Paul H. (talk) 02:38, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- I started the draft here. Get out your books, as soon as you feel comfortable doing so please.
I'd like to help you as much as possible, so you could strategically add online sources first. --ΟΥΤΙΣ (talk) 14:52, 4 August 2021 (UTC)- Paul H., thanks a ton for the work you've already done on the draft. But please take a look at my translation of the German article I just added into the draft.
It might be possible (just a guess) that the lede should be similar to the German: That it is primarily a diffuse historical term. (In the sense of not being used by most mainstream science, today.)
I'm not sure about this and hope you're still interested in helping. I am doing this because I want readers not be misled, so I'd like to honest here, too, if this turns out to be true.
We should first take this into consideration before investing much more energy. What do you think? --ΟΥΤΙΣ (talk) 04:11, 9 August 2021 (UTC) - Bwt, I don't think the German text is particularly well written, but I tried to translate verbatim, mostly. I put it there so we have more material that we can use (but don't have to). --ΟΥΤΙΣ (talk) 04:31, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
- Paul H., thanks a ton for the work you've already done on the draft. But please take a look at my translation of the German article I just added into the draft.
- I started the draft here. Get out your books, as soon as you feel comfortable doing so please.
National Association of Black Geoscientists moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, National Association of Black Geoscientists, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creepTalk 08:46, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 46
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 46, July – August 2021
- Library design improvements deployed
- New collections available in English and German
- Wikimania presentation
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:15, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 47
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 47, September – October 2021
- On-wiki Wikipedia Library notification rolling out
- Search tool deployed
- New My Library design improvements
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:58, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Books & Bytes – Issue 48
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 48, November – December 2021
- 1Lib1Ref 2022
- Wikipedia Library notifications deployed
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:13, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 49
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 49, January – February 2022
- New library collections
- Blog post published detailing technical improvements
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:06, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jeannette Island, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cleavage.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Henrietta Island, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cobble.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 50
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 50, March – April 2022
- New library partner - SPIE
- 1Lib1Ref May 2022 underway
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:52, 1 June 2022 (UTC) (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Suavjärvi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greenstone.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Suavjärvi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greenstone.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Eye of the Sahara
I honestly don't remember anymore! But a good current source saying the same is NASA [4] Owen (talk) 02:59, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:41, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Yo Ho Ho
Doug Weller talk is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec16a}} to your friends' talk pages.
Books & Bytes – Issue 51
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 51, May – June 2022
- New library partners
- SAGE Journals
- Elsevier ScienceDirect
- University of Chicago Press
- Information Processing Society of Japan
- Feedback requested on this newsletter
- 1Lib1Ref May 2022
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:45, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 52
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 52, July – August 2022
- New instant-access collections:
- SpringerLink and Springer Nature
- Project MUSE
- Taylor & Francis
- ASHA
- Loeb
- Feedback requested on this newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:21, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright problem: Camas prairie
Hello Paul H.! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Camas prairie, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://inside.mines.edu/UserFiles/File/Geology/Camas_red.pdf, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
- Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Camas prairie and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en
wikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Camas prairie, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions. - If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Camas prairie. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Camas prairie with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.
It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.
Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Camas prairie saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Diannaa (talk) 15:56, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Please don't do your rewrite in your sandbox. Do it at Talk:Camas prairie/Temp, which will be deleted afterwards. Thank you, — Diannaa (talk) 11:33, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:49, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 53
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 53, September – October 2022
- New collections:
- Edward Elgar
- E-Yearbook
- Corriere della Serra
- Wikilala
- Collections moved to Library Bundle:
- Ancestry
- New feature: Outage notification
- Spotlight: Collections indexed in EDS
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Spacing
FYI, Paul, MOS:DOUBLESPACE says double spacing in the text does not matter. – S. Rich (talk) 02:33, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the heads up. I overlooked that part of the manual of style. Paul H. (talk) 03:42, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 54
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 54, November – December 2022
- New collections:
- British Newspaper Archive
- Findmypast
- University of Michigan Press
- ACLS
- Duke University Press
- 1Lib1Ref 2023
- Spotlight: EDS Refine Results
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:14, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pendant bar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Granule.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 55
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 55, January – February 2023
- New bundle partners:
- Newspapers.com
- Fold3
- 1Lib1Ref January report
- Spotlight: EDS SmartText Searching
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:45, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 56
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 56, March – April 2023
- New partner:
- Perlego
- Library access tips and tricks
- Spotlight: EveryBookItsReader
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:03, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tapeats Sandstone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lingula.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:56, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muav Limestone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hydrolith.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 57
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 57, May – June 2023
- Suggestion improvements
- Favorite collections tips
- Spotlight: Promoting Nigerian Books and Authors
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
About archiving talk pages
Hello Paul H, and thanks for getting the ball rolling on setting up an archive for Piri Reis map. From the edit history it looks like you had trouble getting the expected behavior from the template/bot. If so, take a look at this diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3APiri_Reis_map&diff=1168178883&oldid=1167947949
You'll notice that you pretty much had everything set up correctly. I wanted to explain what that change I made does in case it helps you set up archives in the future. The |archive= parameter in the template is the name of the wiki page where the bot will make the archive and the "%(counter)d" bit is a variable for the bot. So without "/Archive", the template would have been instructing the bot to make the talk page archive as the talk page for a nonexistent article's main talk page (Talk:Piri Reis map 1) which I suppose the bot will not do.
Hope that helps and thanks again, Rjjiii (talk) 02:49, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 58
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 58, July – August 2023
- New partners - De Standaard and Duncker & Humblot
- Tech tip: Filters
- Wikimania presentation
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:27, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 59
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 59, September – October 2023
- Spotlight: Introducing a repository of anti-disinformation projects
- Tech tip: Library access methods
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:15, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Invitation
- Hello Paul H., we need experienced volunteers.
- New Page Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles. We could use a few extra hands on deck if you think you can help.
- Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; Wikipedia needs experienced users to perform this task and there are precious few with the appropriate skills. Even a couple reviews a day can make a huge difference.
- Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision (if it looks daunting, don't worry, it basically boils down to checking CSD, notability, and title). If this looks like something that you can do, please consider joining us.
- If you would like to join the project and help out, please see the granting conditions. You can apply for the user-right HERE.
- If you have questions, please feel free to drop a message at the reviewer's discussion board.
- Cheers, and hope to see you around.
Sent by NPP Coordination using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Palaeochannel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aeolian.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 60
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 60, November – December 2023
- Three new partners
- Google Scholar integration
- How to track partner suggestions
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --13:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 61
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 61, January – February 2024
- Bristol University Press and British Online Archives now available
- 1Lib1Ref results
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ablation Point, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fold.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 62
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 62, March – April 2024
- IEEE and Haaretz now available
- Let's Connect Clinics about The Wikipedia Library
- Spotlight and Wikipedia Library tips
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Table Mountain (Tuolumne County, California), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greenstone.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Door in the tunnel in the Cheops pyramid
Hello, thank you very much for your answers on the forum. Would it be difficult for you to tell me when new information will appear on opening the doors in the tunnel in the Cheops pyramid? Vyacheslav84 (talk) 04:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, yes, as I have not heard anything new other than the April 11, 2024 discussion on the Hall Of Ma'at's. If there is any news in June about the doors in the tunnel (shafts) in the Cheops pyramid, I am quite certain it will be posted to and discussed on the Ancient Egypt Forum by people with better connections than I have. Paul H. (talk) 17:34, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dotsero, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pennsylvanian.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 21:36, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 63
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 63, May – June 2024
- One new partner
- 1Lib1Ref
- Spotlight: References check
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:15, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello! Now that the article has survived AfD and been moved, would you mind adding a couple references to the article? I would but I think you're better positioned! SportingFlyer T·C 16:07, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up. I am working on it. Paul H. (talk) 20:29, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! It should be good for now, so there's no hurry. SportingFlyer T·C 07:46, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Eocene vs Pliocene uplift of Sierra Nevada
Hi, Paul. I wanted to invite you to look at Sierra Nevada#Geological history. An editor added material that claimed that "old" (e.g., Eocene) uplift of the Sierra Nevada was the established theory. My understanding is that Eocene vs Pliocene uplift is still an open issue (see, e.g., [5]). I attempted to balance the two competing hypotheses in the article.
I know that you did a lot of background research when you edited Table Mountain (Tuolumne County, California), so you're probably more familiar with the issue than I am. Did I capture the right balance, or should there be an emphasis on one or the other competing hypotheses? Please feel free to join in the editing. — hike395 (talk) 04:34, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 64
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 64, July – August 2024
- The Hindu Group joins The Wikipedia Library
- Wikimania presentation
- New user script for easily searching The Wikipedia Library
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:33, 11 September 2024 (UTC)