Jump to content

User talk:Paul Butterworth

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Paul Butterworth, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Leslie William Bills, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Blablubbs|talk 14:50, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Leslie William Bills

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Leslie William Bills requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Blablubbs|talk 14:50, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Paul Robert Butterworth

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Paul Robert Butterworth, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

  • It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
  • It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kpgjhpjm 08:11, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have increased the length and content of the article Paul Butterworth (talk) 10:41, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

St Mary Magdalene, Great Burstead

[edit]

Hi,

I've moved Great burstead church to the more appropriate name St Mary Magdalene, Great Burstead, which appears to be its official name from the sources given. Please continue editing at that article. Spiderone 18:25, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

St Mary Magdalene, Great Burstead moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, St Mary Magdalene, Great Burstead, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster talk 22:33, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes have completed to publish, thanks for remind Paul Butterworth (talk) 23:14, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: St Mary Magdalene, Great Burstead (January 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ezlev were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This submission is a good start with interesting content, but it needs sources in order to be on Wikipedia. The links above might help you to find suitable references.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
warmly, ezlev. talk 01:11, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Paul Butterworth! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! warmly, ezlev. talk 01:11, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move of Great burstead church -> Great Burstead church and proposed deletion of former

[edit]

Proposed deletion of Great burstead church

[edit]
Notice

The article Great burstead church has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

'Burstead' should be spelled with a capital 'B' as the name of the settlement is 'Great Burstead'. I have moved the article (which is a redirect to a draft) to Great Burstead church. I can see no reason for keeping the page with 'burstead' spelled with a small 'b'.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mertbiol (talk) 19:54, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's a just reason, should have a capital B Paul Butterworth (talk) 23:11, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: St Mary Magdalene, Great Burstead (January 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 15:05, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Reliable sources, I am trying to figure out how to link to reference section at bottom, it's taking time to figure out how to to link Paul Butterworth (talk) 23:10, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Try using <ref> and </ref> tags. (You also need {{reflist}} under the References section header.) For more information, please see WP:FOOTNOTES. Mertbiol (talk) 09:55, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Leslie William Bills moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Leslie William Bills, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Currently all the sourcing either does not mention the article's subject, or is simply a brief mention. You need two things, first, in-depth coverage of Bills himself (not about the colliery, or his books, but about him), in order to establish that he meets notability criteria. Second, every assertion made in the article needs to be sourced from a reliable, independent source (currently this article is entirely devoid of such sources). (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 14:40, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

totally disagree with what you are saying, Leslie William Bills, could possibly be the last living Bevin Boy, his testament is the ultimate citation, his work is written in the book Fettered Freedom, I have included independent sources IWM Imperial War Museum London, hold copes of his books, would they hold copies if the subject matter was not just.
I have covered in-depth about Bills, the article describes his early years family, career, hobbies and interests what else would you suggest, what paper he reads, what was his first car, I must say you seem to be singling me out with this page and L32 Burial site Great Burstead, why, I disagree with your views. Paul Butterworth (talk) 20:19, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

L32 Zeppelin burial site Great Burstead moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, L32 Zeppelin burial site Great Burstead, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. In addition to being poorly cited, you seem to have a COI with this subject, since are using it to promote your YouTube videos. WP is not an advertising platform.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 15:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I have removed the inks connecting to videos that I made, I had no intension to advertise or make financial gain, the videos were created simply to give information on the subject matter.
The page itself has plenty of independent citations, I think the site shows plenty of information on the subject matter, plenty of references confirm this Paul Butterworth (talk) 20:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: L32 Zeppelin burial site Great Burstead (February 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Zeppelin LZ 74. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The zeppelin was already covered by LZ 74. The burial sites can be summarized as a section there.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 21:09, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some friendly advice

[edit]

Hi @Paul Butterworth:

I know you will feel a little upset that the articles that you have started have been moved to draftspace, but I would like to reassure you that you are not being victimised or 'singled out'. Wikipedia is a collaborative project to build an encyclopaedia. All of us who write are bound by the same set of guidelines. We all know that sometimes these can be confusing - even for experienced contributors. Your articles are not 'lost', they are simply incubating in the draftspace until they are ready to be published.

If you would like to continue to contribute and develop the articles that you have started, then my advice is to begin with Draft:St Mary Magdalene, Great Burstead. Since the church is Grade I listed, it satisfies the notability criteria and therefore 'deserves' an article in the main space. At the moment, it is not ready to be published, but it could be soon, if you are able to improve the referencing. I suggest that you have a look at St Mary's Church, Mundon, St Clement's Church, West Thurrock and St Nicholas' Church, Berden - they are all Grade I listed churches in Essex - and use these as templates to build the Great Burstead church article. In particular have a look at the way in which they use the <ref> and </ref> tags. The Historic England entry on the church will be invaluable to you, as will books which are available to you locally. Once the article on the church is published, then you can turn your attention to the other articles, where it is more difficult to establish notability.

I am happy to provide advice and answer any questions you might have as you go about improving the article on the church.

Best wishes and happy editing. Mertbiol (talk) 22:25, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
  • If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Paul Butterworth (talk) 10:11, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello reason I did nor believe the page is worthy to be merged with LZ74, this is where the L32 which is what the zeppelin is most commonly known as, crashed and the crew were buried here, LZ74 page although goes into depth about the ship itself, is based on a memorial in a distant land from Great Burstead, the Crews importance is everything to me, they manned the Zeppelin, and ultimately died in her, how can we move forward with this page, thanks pb

Concern regarding Draft:Leslie William Bills

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Paul Butterworth. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Leslie William Bills, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:L32 Zeppelin burial site Great Burstead

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Paul Butterworth. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:L32 Zeppelin burial site Great Burstead, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Leslie William Bills

[edit]

Hello, Paul Butterworth. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Leslie William Bills".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:37, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Leslie William Bills for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leslie William Bills is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leslie William Bills until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mvqr (talk) 16:25, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:L32 Zeppelin burial site Great Burstead

[edit]

Hello, Paul Butterworth. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "L32 Zeppelin burial site Great Burstead".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:39, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Paul_Butterworth&oldid=1084312947"