Jump to content

User talk:PatGallacher/Archive 6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1←Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8→Archive 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dronavalli Harika, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grandmaster (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Grand Duchy and Grand Duchy

I have seen the discussion about the deletion only two hours ago. What's the problem with that content? Is it usourced or what? What's the difference between the Grand Duchy of Tuscany and the Monarchy of Bavaria or the Grand Duchy of Hesse? Are they larger than Tuscany or what? --Chiorbone da Frittole (talk) 02:20, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Yes, a crucial problem was that this line of succession is unsourced. I am in the process of going through these lines of succession to former monarchies, in my view many of them are not encyclopedic and candidates for deletion, but I am prepared to take this in easy stages and I recognise that each must be considered on its individual merits. Hesse looks like a likely candidate for deletion, not sure about Bavaria? PatGallacher (talk) 02:24, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Kingdom of Bavaria: 1806–1918 (112 years). Grand Duchy of Hesse: 1806–1918 (112 years). Grand Duchy of Baden: 1806–1918 (112 years). Grand Duchy of Mecklenburg-Schwerin: 1815-1918 (103 years). Kingdom of Hanover: 1814-1866 (52 years) . Kingdom of Albania: 1928-1939 (11 years!). All these reigns have their "line of succession throne" wiki page. Grand Duchy of Tuscany: 1569-1859 (290 years, but it's even older, because Grand Duchy of Tuscany succeeded the Duchy of Florence). Anyway, i will look for some sources in the next days. --Chiorbone da Frittole (talk) 02:57, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Wyndham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Village of the Damned (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Rosie Huntington-Whitely

Hi. I've reverted your deletion of what I believe to be properly sourced and notable material. In my edit summary, I indicated that I'd start a thread on the talk page, so we (and any other interested editors) can try to achieve a consensus about whether your deletion should be restored. I've now started the thread. I'd welcome your input.

Thanks. David in DC (talk) 21:51, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Honkala

Replied on my talk page. 50.193.171.70 (talk) 22:03, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Wha'll be King but Charlie? (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Jacobite and Lady Nairne
Loir (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Yazoo

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Clarification

Cautious support This is certainly how it was normally known in English-language news coverage during the Vietnam war, which even now is how many people will have heard of it. PatGallacher (talk) 16:45, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi Pat, I check here rather than on page. Can you please clarify in your !vote if "it" means Haiphong or Cần Thơ. Take care. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:28, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

2012 gang rape

Hi, 2.5 hours behind what in this edit? And everywhere else we've used "pm" rather than "p.m.", so I think you have to follow the same style. Off out - am sure you can tweak! - Sitush (talk) 22:39, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Duncolm

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Duncolm requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. LlamaAl (talk) 01:40, 29 December 2012 (UTC)


Please change the name of Modern day Sparta to Sparta and not Sparti

I have provided fresh links here detailing the reasons this should be done.By now both the Greek Ministry of Tourism and the Municipality of Sparta refer to it exclusively as Sparta.As is the Guardian http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sparti — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weatherextremes (talk • contribs) 11:03, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Also the Mayor of Sparta refers to Modern day Sparta as Sparta exclusively in English in all international dealings as you can see in my first link.Please change it as I have trouble explaining again and again to non natives of the Greek language this non issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weatherextremes (talk • contribs) 11:09, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Neil Munro (writer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Jacobite
The New Road (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Neil Munro

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The New Road, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jacobite (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The View from Daniel Pike, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edward Boyd (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Myra Taylor (scriptwriter)

The article Myra Taylor (scriptwriter) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable person

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JayJayWhat did I do? 01:09, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Emperor Bokassa

Further to the move. I noted there appeared to be a consensus on the talk page in favour of the royal title for the article. Perhaps an appropriate compromise would be for the article title to remain Jean-Badel Bokassa, but the first line of the article in bold to read "Bokassa I of Central Africa"? There is a tendency to say, "he wasn't really a monarch," but this is at odds with the recognition his country received from the rest of the world, including America. --Counter-revolutionary (talk) 13:50, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

It's far from clear that this is the consensus, I suggest you raise a formal move request. PatGallacher (talk) 15:03, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

I formed my view of the consensus based on comments appearing in the article's talk page, the majority of which are in favour of the regnal title. I will make the request your recommend, thanks. --Counter-revolutionary (talk) 12:45, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sean Scanlan

The article Sean Scanlan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, doesn't meet WP:NACTOR

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. James086Talk 13:15, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Pope Benedict XVI and Wikidata

Wikidata is now enabled on the English Wikipedia. Please do not blindly revert as vandalism edits that remove interwiki links. —Naddy (talk) 15:07, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

This ought to be properly explained, and even now I'm not sure I fully understand it. PatGallacher (talk) 15:58, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Party of Associates with Licensees

The article Party of Associates with Licensees has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources, no listed candidates, no mention in the proposed merge target

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NickPenguin(contribs) 03:48, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Talks with Ezhiki

Hi, would You look at my talks with Ezhiki, "Yanisyarvi", but Virmajärvi and Kalevala, please. --WPK (talk) 15:24, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of 2009 Georgia earthquake for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2009 Georgia earthquake is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Georgia earthquake until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dawnseeker2000 21:10, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia - Warning

You recently accussed me of personal attacks on other editors, reading through your talk page is quite frightening for me as i can see a severe history of problems in almost every department for yourself, however, this did not affect your confidence to come bumbling down to my talk page as if your own discussion page didn't exist. Please don't ever vandalise my talk page again or we may have to take this further and i doubt your talk page quite frankly has the room anyway. Thank you for your comments but if you again try to accuse me of any false insults under the umbrella of political correctness this will have to be take further. Reaper7 (talk) 01:36, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Well, I believe that in the course of your unsourced ramblings on Talk:Kate Middleton you did make unwarranted attacks on other editors, so I believe that the level 1 warning I placed on your talk page was legitmate, but I won't take things any further at present. PatGallacher (talk) 12:15, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

You really are hideously sanctimonious. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.67.37.244 (talk) 12:52, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

See, I told you were hideously sanctimonious. Get a fucking brain of your own instead of using a template that makes you sound like an idiot. "Please don't attack TwatGallacher by TwatGallacher".

Hi guys! What's up Pat? — Preceding unsigned comment added by FACEJJ (talk • contribs) 05:12, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Patricia Walsh

Hello, PatGallacher. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Patricia Walsh, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Patricia Walsh to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, ♦ Tentinator ♦ 22:18, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Patricia Walsh (athlete)

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Patricia Walsh (athlete). The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:16, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of James Patrick (sociologist)

The article James Patrick (sociologist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability in article and none found in a search. BLP, unsourced since April 2012.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MelanieN (talk) 22:04, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello! I see that you have removed the Proposed Deletion tag, and found another reference. I will let it stand, although the references might not meet the requirement for independent reliable sources if challenged. But I have some advice. I see from your talk page that a lot of your articles get prodded. I think you could avoid a lot of that if you would cite the references properly as inline citations, rather than putting them in External Links. If you're not familiar with how to cite references, here's a quick primer: 1) click on the "cite" button above the edit window. 2) choose an appropriate format, such as "web" or "news". 3) fill in the blanks. 4) put your cursor in the appropriate place in the text (right after some fact that is supported by the reference). 5) click "add citation". That's important! If you don't add the citation to the text, it will disappear and you'll have to do it all over. Then to set up a place for these reference citations to be listed, add ==References== or ==Notes==, and underneath that put <references /> or {{reflist}}. You can click "show preview" to make sure you did it right, if you want (I always do), but be sure to click "save page" before finishing! Hope this helps - and forgive me if I am telling you what you already know. --MelanieN (talk) 23:17, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Agrippa Postumus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Learning difficulties
The Three Bears (comic strip) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Viz

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:11, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2013 Scottish Challenge Cup Final

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 2013 Scottish Challenge Cup Final requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 00:47, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sue Smith (trainer)

The article Sue Smith (trainer) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 02:47, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Margaret Thatcher (disambiguation)

We do bold the primary topics (per WP:MOSDAB). Widefox; talk 12:07, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Julia Drusilla may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave my operator a message on his talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:27, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Agrippina the Younger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Barbara Young
Karin Foley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Tenko

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:49, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Karin Foley

Hello, PatGallacher. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Karin Foley, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Karin Foley to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Gbawden (talk) 10:04, 2 May 2013 (UTC) 

Gbawden (talk) 10:04, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Sorry I thought the system notified you automatically. You may want to find additional sources - imdb is not considered a reliable source. And for a biographical page you need to put the references inline rather than as external links. Apologies if you know this already Gbawden (talk) 08:36, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Referencing biographical articles

Hi. You might find this article useful http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Tutorial/Citing_sources For biographical articles you need to cite a source for things like DOB, etc rather than add an external link at the bottom of the page Gbawden (talk) 08:40, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gary Warren, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mame (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Confused talk page

In this edit I removed one of your talk comments that had been provoked by a bad movement of old comments. I hope you agree this was the right thing to do. Dicklyon (talk) 05:21, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, Harold Jones (murderer), has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Harold Jones (murderer)" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 19:23, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lufthansa Flight 181 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:40, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Coordinating Committee for the Refoundation of the Fourth International may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:21, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bela Khotenashvili, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Douglas Coghill

Hello, PatGallacher. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Douglas Coghill, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Douglas Coghill to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Surfer43 (talk) 00:13, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Sarah Brown RfC/RM

Hi Pat, your comment [1] on the Sarah Brown RfC said that there were no alternatives listed, but this was a bot error. In fact, there are several listed. Would you mind taking another look? Many thanks, SlimVirgin (talk) 01:43, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Noel Pemberton Billing

I've undone you edit because you changed the date while retaining the very source that says '1923'. We can have text cited to a source that's being misrepresented. If the source is incorrect please replace it with a better source. Presumably you derived this date from somewehere. Paul B (talk) 10:30, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bernard Hepton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry V (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Olive Mercer

Hello, PatGallacher. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Olive Mercer, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Olive Mercer to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Ghostboy1997 (talk) 00:59, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Warning and replay back

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Olive Mercer, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - Plus, I believe this is a real person, but ill let this warning slip. The author is NOT supposed to delete deletion tags.

I did not remove a speedy deletion tag, I removed a proposed deletion tag, which is perfectly legitimate. PatGallacher (talk) 01:11, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Eastern "coyote"

A move request discussion you might be interested in at Talk:Eastern "coyote". —  AjaxSmack  02:44, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Botany, Glasgow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Patrick (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Pablo Lopez, etc

I can see why you say that, but where are the references? I will restore it for you to work on. Deb (talk) 11:31, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Pablo Sebastián López

Hi. Did you find any references, or shall I delete it again?Deb (talk) 09:06, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

I have added a reference. However, while this article may not be in good shape, I don't think it's a candidate for speedy deletion. PatGallacher (talk) 12:21, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Hillary Clinton move review

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Move_review/Log/2013_June#Hillary_Clinton. Since you participated in this discussion on the rename of Hillary Rodham Clinton to Hillary Clinton, you are invited to offer your opinion at the move review. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 16:02, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Downing Street Director of Communications, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Craig Oliver (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Since you are the leading registered editor in terms of edits at John Wyndham, you might want to participate in the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Novels#Derivative_works_and_cultural_references_templates regarding including navigation boxes for adaptations of and related subjects to an authors works on the author's bio page.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:53, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Category:Byzantine emperors killed in battle

Category:Byzantine emperors killed in battle, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Constantine ✍ 12:55, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Dieppe, Seine-Maritime

Hi. In my opinion this page should be at Dieppe and the others moved to Dieppe (disambiguation). As far as I'm concerned the Dieppe is the one in northern France. Can you reopen a new request for move and I and several others will probably support.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 16:21, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Tend to agree, but why don't you open the move request? PatGallacher (talk) 16:40, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Done♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 17:09, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Deletion

Normally I display a friendly approach even to people who try to delete my articles as they're usually wrong, but this comment displays shockingly poor judgement for an editor who seems to have experience and a usual good insight on here and as a result I've been unusually sarcastic in my AFD retorts, especially as I did tell you it would get blown away at AFD as it's notable. Notability is decided by coverage in sources, nothing else. In future, please kindly ask me to expand something if you believe it is not notable. I'd be happy to do do amicably. I wish you all the best, but please try not to make such shocking comments again, if we all thought like that we'd only cover the UK and the US and ignore the rest of the world as they're not English!!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 18:17, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Warren Hill (prisoner), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Massimo Roccoli

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Massimo Roccoli. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:11, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Jyoti Singh Pandey listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jyoti Singh Pandey. Since you had some involvement with the Jyoti Singh Pandey redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). The Banner talk 04:23, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Norbert Smith – a Life may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • public criticism, Sir Norbert replies “well, Sir [[Alec Guinness]] simply wasn’t available” (presumably a reference to ''[[A Passage to India (film)|A Passage to India]]''. Enfield would later

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:34, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Peter Manuel may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [[Allan Nicol|Nicol, Allan]] ''Manuel: Scotland's First Serial Killer'' (with an introduction by [[Donald Findlay]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:21, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Allan Nicol

Hello, PatGallacher. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Allan Nicol, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Allan Nicol to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Ironholds (talk) 23:07, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Hey Pat - thanks for adding the reference :). Just a note: references should be in a section titled "References", rather than "External links" - which is for links to other pages that aren't sources, but might be useful. An example here would be a link to Nicol's chambers, or personal website. I've fixed it in this article - just an FYI. Keep up the good work :). Ironholds (talk) 17:39, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Structure and organisation of Interregnum articles

As you were active in a recent page move on this subject, this is a heads-up for a possible reorganisation of the Commonwealth and Interregnum articles, please see Talk:Commonwealth of England#Structure and organisation of Interregnum articles -- PBS (talk) 10:42, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited I Remember Mama, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent Television (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peter Manuel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CID (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Eve de Leon Allen

Hello PatGallacher,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Eve de Leon Allen for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Green Cardamom (talk) 19:09, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Eve de Leon Allen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eve de Leon Allen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eve de Leon Allen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Darkwind (talk) 20:20, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Collie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shep (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Scottish local elections, 2017

Hello PatGallacher,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Scottish local elections, 2017 for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheProudEditor (talk) 18:21, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Helena Gloag (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie
Margo Cunningham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:PatGallacher/Archive_6&oldid=1139109429"