User talk:Chiorbone da Frittole

Welcome!

Hello Chiorbone da Frittole, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

At Wikipedia, new Users do not automatically receive a welcome; not even a machine-generated welcome. Welcome messages come from other Users. They are personal and genuine. They contain an offer of assistance if such assistance is ever desired.

I suggest to everyone I welcome that they may find some of the following helpful — there’s nothing personal in my suggestion and you may not need any of them:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Dolphin (t) 06:05, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Italian Renaissance may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

cities of [[Florence]]. <ref>Burke, P., ''The European Renaissance: Centre and Peripheries'' 1998)</ref> It later spread to [[Venice]], where the remains of [[ancient Greece|ancient Greek culture]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:44, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Polenta, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:10, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Volterra. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Aoidh (talk) 13:46, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just so there's no confusion, if you hit "undo" again without providing a source, you will be reported at WP:AN3 and likely blocked from editing. - Aoidh (talk) 13:50, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Chiorbone da Frittole. You have new messages at Aoidh's talk page.
Message added 13:58, 26 April 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Aoidh (talk) 13:58, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Bartoli family hoax and disruptive editing. Thank you. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 00:51, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Chiorbone da Frittole. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Chiorbone da Frittole. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Torquato Tasso, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tuscan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ángel Di María, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:34, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Chiorbone da Frittole. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ethnic groups in Europe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Etruscan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Francesco Guccini, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emilia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:09, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Laura Battiferri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carpi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:01, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright infringement

I can see that you are a newish editor, but you need to know that Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. You must not copy and paste text from sources you find on the web into articles as you did in the article Durowe. The infringing text has been removed because the material you copied is subject to copyright, as is almost everything on the web. When creating or expanding articles, you should completely rewrite the information from the source using your own words. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:32, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused fields in refs

Hi, when you add citations, please only include the fields that contain data. Including every possible template field isn't necessary and it makes articles harder to edit. This example shows the cite you added and what it looked like after it was cleaned up:

Before: <ref>{{cite news |last1=M. |first1=C. |author-link1= |last2= |first2= |author-link2= |last3= |first3= |author-link3= |last4= |first4= |author-link4= |last5= |first5= |author-link5= |display-authors= |author-mask= |name-list-style= |date=January 9, 2018 |year=2018 |orig-year= |title=Quanto conosci Morena Baccarin, l'attrice brasiliana dal sangue italiano e dallo sguardo magnetico |script-title= |trans-title= |url=https://www.elle.com/it/magazine/a23548965/morena-baccarin-attrice-biografia-film/ |url-status= |format= |editor1-last= |editor1-first= |editor1-link= |editor2-last= |editor2-first= |editor2-link= |editor3-last= |editor3-first= |editor3-link= |editor4-last= |editor4-first= |editor4-link= |editor5-last= |editor5-first= |editor5-link= |display-editors= |department= |work=[[Elle (magazine)|Elle]] |type= |series= |language=Italian|volume= |issue= |others= |edition= |location=Milan |publisher= Hearst Magazine Italia |publication-date= |agency= |page= |pages= |at= |no-pp= |arxiv= |asin= |bibcode= |doi= |doi-broken-date= |isbn= |issn= |jfm= |jstor= |lccn= |mr= |oclc= |ol= |osti= |pmc= |pmid= |rfc= |ssrn= |zbl= |id= |archive-url= |archive-date= |access-date= |via= |url-access= |lay-url= |lay-source= |lay-date= |quote= |postscript= |ref=}} </ref>

After: <ref>{{cite news |last1=M. |first1=C. |date=January 9, 2018 |year=2018 |title=Quanto conosci Morena Baccarin, l'attrice brasiliana dal sangue italiano e dallo sguardo magnetico |url=https://www.elle.com/it/magazine/a23548965/morena-baccarin-attrice-biografia-film/ |work=[[Elle (magazine)|Elle]] |language=Italian|location=Milan |publisher= Hearst Magazine Italia }} </ref>

Thanks, and happy editing! Schazjmd (talk) 16:36, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sergius (name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Servius.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tyrsenian languages

In this recent edit, you have stated that an archaeogenetic study made a conclusion about linguistics. Given that the authors were working on the broader archaeological question of "who were the Etruscans?", they cite everything written about the group, including its cultural artefacts, which include linguistic remains. However, as non-linguists, these DNA scientists were only answering the question "who were the Etruscans genetically?" I believe the part you changed was more accurate before your edit, and am putting it back the way it was. Quisqualis (talk) 02:15, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 24

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Canon 7

added a link pointing to Canon

Canon P

added a link pointing to Canon

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Aghlabids. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 14:10, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chiorbone da Frittole. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 15:03, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chiorbone da Frittole (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not use any sockpuppet and it is a a very serious incident that I was blocked. The check user did not provide any evidence that I used a sockpuppet. The anonymous ip that is attributed to me as sockpuppet is completely different from my IP. You cannot ban users in this way without providing any evidence in this way. Chiorbone da Frittole (talk) 20:25, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No checkuser commented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chiorbone da Frittole; you are claiming that a checkuser did, but failed to provide any evidence. Note additionally that you are accused of either logging out to continue editing or recruiting people to edit on your behalf. Either would be a violation of WP:SOCK but you haven't addressed the latter. Yamla (talk) 20:40, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chiorbone da Frittole (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not use any sockpuppuet, and I didn't log out to continue editing. These are unfouded accusations. Does it not occur to you that it may be other people who intervened that have nothing to do with me? The two IP addresses that are attributed to me incorrectly as sockpuppets are both from the same geographical area which is at least 800 km away from me and my Ip address, it was enough to use the WHOIS tool to verify it. So what investigation was done? None. And I did not recruit any people to edit on my behalf, this is another unfounded accusation, and no evidence has been provided that I have done so. I have no relationship with other users who have contributed on the page on the Aghlabids. On the other hand, in the discussion on the Aghlabids page, three users, all very much aligned, intervened, last of whom made the complaint against me. The report came from this user who was personally involved in a discussion with which I disagreed. So it is some kind of revenge to remove a user who disagreed. I have been registered since 2011 at Wikipedia and in 12 years I have never been accused of sockpuppetry and it just happens to happen for the first time when I disagree with three users who all seem to move together! If Wikipedia banned a user without any evidence, accused coincidentally by another involved with him in an discussion, as is happening, how should it be interpreted? Why the rush to block me without providing any evidence? I didn't do any of what I am accused of.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. The one-week block has ended, so this is now moot. Z1720 (talk) 21:59, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Stonewalling_and_POV_pushing_in_the_Aghlabids_article

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--L2212 (talk) 19:19, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@L2212: If you haven't noticed, I was blocked for a week with false accusations and no proof. It was the first time I intervened on that page, I did not use any sockpuppet, I did not log off to continue editing, I did not recruit any person to edit in my name, e I wasn't recruited myself, but no admin cares whether the allegations against me are true or false. So I can only write in my talk. I have already written that the map is clearly a fanciful interpretation of the map in the book. I also opened on Wikicommos a request to delete these map. I don't know what to add, honestly. --Chiorbone da Frittole (talk) 09:14, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at La chimera, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please do not add unsourced shooting locations. I have since fixed the issue. Οἶδα (talk) 15:57, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]