User talk:Nixinova/Archive 2019

This is an archive of past discussions with Nixinova. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

2017 • 2018 • 2019 • 2020 • 2021 • 2022

File source problem with File:Ultima Thule original vs sharpened.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Ultima Thule original vs sharpened.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 23:29, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Heartbeat star

Hello, Nixinova,

Thanks for creating Heartbeat star! I edit here too, under the username Lithopsian and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

No other pages wikilink this one. This is not unusual for new pages, but it is a good idea to find some related articles and add a little context to allow for a link here so that people are more likely to find it. "Parent" articles (eg. binary star) are often a good place to start. Don't go linking from inappropriate places though, "spamming" attracts the wrong sort of attention.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Lithopsian}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lithopsian (talk) 21:01, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Nixinova! You created a thread called When to archive at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grace Millane.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Nixinova! You created a thread called Death age adjusted for timezone? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Dobos torte for you!

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.

To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:27, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment

here You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows. You were right. That being said, maybe we can set a wikipedia record for longest deletion discussion. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:26, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What a surprise! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 19:14, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of most-liked online posts for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of most-liked online posts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-liked online posts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 15:37, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Grace Millane.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Grace Millane.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments to my talk page.

Hi.

Please do not add unconstructive and incorrect sections to my talk page.

Your subjective opinions are not held by everyone. My addition to the Pewdiepie vs T-Series talk page was in every form possible constructive discussion. Even if you don't believe it merited discussion please answer on that talk page. Do not disrupt or add to my talk page. That is inappropriate. 02:53, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

ok I note you responded on the actual talk page as well. That's reasonable. It's important that things on Wikipedia are relevant and notable for the long term, not the latest meme or hyped up drama. Anonywiki (talk) 02:56, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You literally vandalised the article. That is unacceptable. Take it up on the talk page not the article itself. Nixinova T C 03:26, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copypasta

User:Nixinova/Navy Seal copypasta. Probably should be moved to mainspace. It has gained widespread coverage because it was included in the NZ shooter's manifesto. That's a rather sad way of becoming notable, but it's quite notable now. wumbolo ^^^ 11:07, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, didn't realize it was covered at Copypasta. But... shouldn't copypasta be a WP:Summary style article covering all the different kinds of copypasta? Including summarizing the Creepypasta article. wumbolo ^^^ 11:09, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've asked for my subpage to be moved into mainspace. Nixinova T C 23:37, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Instagram egg

On 19 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Instagram egg, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that an image of an egg posted on the social media service Instagram became the most liked online post of all time? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Instagram egg. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Instagram egg), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Navy Seal copypasta.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Navy Seal copypasta.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 02:36, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Navy Seal copypasta for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Navy Seal copypasta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Navy Seal copypasta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 02:45, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Erroneous inline cleanup tag used

In this edit, you added {{more info}}, which is not a cleanup tag. I've replaced it with {{citation needed}}, but you're welcome to replace it with another valid inline cleanup tag. e^πi (talk | contribs) 13:03, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Apple iPad 2.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Apple iPad 2.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

About your request for protection

Hi, Nixinova! You requested protection for the article List of video games by monthly active player count. I declined it, partly because there has been very little activity since the last protection expired. But let me give you a hint about asking for protection: we (patrolling admins) can't tell a vandalism edit from a legitimate edit in an article like that. We rely on the regular editors at the page to make that call. After all, IPs can make constructive edits, and they should not be prevented from doing so. So we look at the history, looking for a pattern, with the assumption that vandalism edits will get reverted. If we see IPs editing and getting reverted, we assume that you are acting in good faith reverting them, so we figure they were problem edits. If we see IPs editing and not getting reverted, we figure their edits must be OK. You said, in your request, that you were tired of reverting. I can sympathize. But if you and other page-watchers don't revert, we aren't able to tell if the article actually has a problem in need of protection. Just letting you know what we look for, so you will know what is needed the next time you request protection. -- MelanieN (talk) 01:12, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mike Baldwin (Internet celebrity)

Hello, Nixinova. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mike Baldwin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:54, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New message from DBigXray

Hello, Nixinova. You have new messages at Wikipedia:In_the_news/Candidates#RD:_Vitthal_Radadiya.
Message added 08:47, 30 July 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DBig Xrayᗙ 08:47, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Radadia

I couldn't understand your new comment. Can you please elaborate here what you meant and which source are you referring to? --DBig Xrayᗙ 20:07, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DBigXray: reference #1 isn't a secondary source, and the link also doesn't work. Nixinova T C 20:21, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed The LS link has now been resurrected through archives. It is only used for non controversial bio facts. let me know if you can support now--DBig Xrayᗙ 05:52, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The link to BIO on Parliament official website is used only for undisputed and non controversial biographical facts. This is not an issue. Please point me to the valid policy that calls it an issue that can stop the article from going to the Mainpage. Lets discuss this here first because it seems we have a difference in opinion on this "issue"--DBig Xrayᗙ 06:05, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm responding on ITNC; no need to split the discussion. Nixinova T C 06:13, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see a lack of understanding of policies, which is why I started this thread. Anyway I have already said what I had to say. regards. --DBig Xrayᗙ 06:33, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Beta Pictoris c. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:49, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

About Marzia page

I understand you are referring to Hillary Clinton's article style, but I was referring to Victoria Beckham's article style, in which her article mentioned her as Beckham throughout the page, including the time before she married the footballer. So, is there like a proper guideline in which style need to be followed or..? Froswo (talk) 12:41, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Froswo: If there is I can't find one. WP:MAIDEN is pretty useless. Anyway, calling her Kjellberg when talking about Felix as well is just confusing and should be avoided. Nixinova T C 19:30, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Efforts to impeach Donald Trump, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emoluments Clause (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:29, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hytale (October 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hytale and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hytale, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:55, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nixinova! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 07:55, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Wikipedia glitch 20191012.png

Thanks for uploading File:Wikipedia glitch 20191012.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:30, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	For your recent work on Mark Zaid. Bearian (talk) 15:20, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Signature length

Hi, Nixinova. I really like your signature. In fact, my signature was a little bit inspired by yours. But unfortunately your signature (294 characters) is over the character limit of a user signature of this guideline: WP:SIGLEN. It states that there is a 255-character limit for both substitution and raw signature wiki markup. You could refer to mine. It's 236 characters long and I tried to shrink it as short as possible, but it's still too long in my opinion. Wei4Green · 唯绿远大 01:46, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Climate Change Response (Zero Carbon) Amendment Bill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Seymour (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:27, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discrepancy in census results

Hello. At 2018 New Zealand census, you appeared to add a table under the heading "Birthplace". The wording of this section says the New Zealand-born population was 3,370,221, while the table says 3,370,122. Is this a typo? The ref (shown at the bottom of the table as #18) is of no help. Please fix this discrepancy, which will also mean a change to the percentage figures given. Akld guy (talk) 02:49, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ref 18 says …122 in the usually resident population on table 3. Nixinova T / C 05:41, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing that. Akld guy (talk) 07:39, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Impeachment inquiry against Donald Trump, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern Standard Time (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:14, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ITN proposal recognition for Murder of Grace Millane

On 23 November 2019, In the news proposed an item that involved the article Murder of Grace Millane, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 01:56, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request to add notable uses to ‘ok boomer’

The term ok boomer is used within most coffee shops within the city of Geelong in Australia, once used by an angry coffee shop owner towards the city mayor at the famous Yarra St Quartermasters, the term has spread to the other coffee shops within the region. Ok boomer is now commonly used when a coffee with caramel syrup is ordered but not on the menu. YSQM (talk) 03:21, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Journalist here

Hi Nixinova,

I'm a journalist who has written regularly about Wikipedia for Slate, the Washington Post, and other publications. If you're interested, you can read some of my work here: stephenharrison.com

I'd be very interested in interviewing you for a potential piece about about the OK Boomer Wikipedia page. Could we exchange a few questions and answers via email? My contact information can be found on my website or with my Wikipedia username. Thanks much. Stephenbharrison (talk) 23:46, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The impeachment of Trump

I've done some edits on your version of the impeachment article, If you like what I have done, tell me and I will gladly delete my version of the article and submit yours as "Impeachment Process of Donald Trump" (which, if it goes as expected will last under that title for ony a week or two). Arglebargle79 (talk) 16:17, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding article on YouTube Rewind 2019

Hello. Recently, you added a section on the soundtrack of YouTube Rewind 2019 here (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=YouTube_Rewind_2019:_For_The_Record&diff=next&oldid=929590359&diffmode=visual). I was wondering if you knew the source of such information, and if you could add it to the Rewind 2019 article.

Thanks. RayDeeUx (talk) 14:07, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2019 Whakaari / White Island eruption

On 9 December 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2019 Whakaari / White Island eruption, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 22:03, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Whakaari/White Island article title RM notice

You recently participated in a discussion on the title of the Whakaari/White Island article. I have made a formal WP:RM request at Talk:Whakaari/White Island if you care to weigh in. — AjaxSmack 17:47, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Impeachment of Donald Trump

On 19 December 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Impeachment of Donald Trump, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 02:38, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Hi Nixinova, I wanted to let you know that I find four signature, extremely distracting. ( I saw it here) Please see if you can choose one, more in line with Wikipedia:Signatures#Guidelines_and_policies. Thanks --DBig Xrayᗙ Happy Holidays! 13:28, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Background

I think this was a bad move. Now the background section in the impeachment page is longer than the main content. There is too much detail. Also, you have made user contributor attribution very difficult to determine. If you wanted more detail in the background section for the parent page, you should have copied selectively and summarized. The inquiry page should give the most background for why the whole process began, not the impeachment page. Please consider swapping back and adding more background to the impeachment page selectively. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 21:01, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Coffeeandcrumbs I moved it since the inquiry page should just be about the inquiry itself and that extensive background information fits better on the main impeachment page. I promoted he h3 Inquiry heading to h2 as it's not really background info, but I agree having half the page be background may not be that good. Nixinova T C 21:07, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please move it back and choose smaller pieces of it to add to the impeachment page. Otherwise, we are going to lose most of it when we eventually trim the impeachment page. The whole reason I wanted to avoid renaming the inquiry page was because someone is eventually going to say this is too much background and want to trim it down. Then we will have lost a lot of content. Most of that background should be part of the inquiry because it is there to explain why the process began in the first place. The inquiry is the true background for the impeachment page. You are making the new impeachment page just as long and cumbersome as the inquiry page was. The inquiry is background for the impeachment page. The impeachment page is the background for the trial page, in my eyes. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 21:23, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We can add if people want to read more background. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 21:28, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, good point, I'll move it back when I can (if you want to, all I did originally was Ctrl+a then cut and paste both sections) Nixinova T C 23:39, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there

Hey there! I've seen you a lot on Hypixel, Draft:Hytale, and PewDiePie vs T-Series, and notice that you work on a lot of gaming articles. I just want to say thank you. I created Mineplex a while ago and am working on Draft:Minecraft Monday if you're interested. Melofors (talk) 18:22, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am interested Dimlix (talk) 13:21, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hawaiian false missile article

aloha

I was on the island of kaua’i during the 2018 interbalistic missile crisis. I noticed you last edited the article about it. I wanted to let you know that the Amber alert my parents and I all separately received on our phones specifically mentioned North Korea. I’m not sure why Wikipedia isn’t including this information.

The amber alert on my phone said INTERBALISTIC MISSILE WARNING FROM NORTH KOREA. THIS IS NOT A DRILL. SEEK SHELTER IN PLACE

perhaps not the exact wording but I promise and know for certain it said North Korea

My mom also agrees she clearly remembers it mentioned the country. It seemed very strange at the time, but of course real.

Do you know why Wikipedia doesn’t have this information showing? Aleciahaselton (talk) 07:59, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Aleciahaselton: Wikipedia doesn't allow anecdotes. Can you find any news articles that show the wording you have given? Otherwise this may just be an example of the Mandela effect. Nixinova T C 18:53, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]