User talk:Nitajk

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. We're so glad you're here! — Lost^(talk) 11:36, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Raman Raghav

A quick question. Wasn't his sentence reduced to life imprisonment sometime in 1980s after the death sentence was delayed because of his mental illness ? The article does not mention anything about it. Tintin (talk) 14:27, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Answer: Yes, his sentence was reduced to life imprisonment because he was found to be incurable. He was lodged at Yerwada jail, Pune and was under treatment at the Central Institute of Mental Health and Research. When a panel of doctors who examined him at the directive of the High Court found that he would never be cured, the High Court reduced his sentence in it's judgement of 4th August 1987. It was only a few months later that Raghav died at Sassoon Hospital. He had been suffering from kidney trouble.

Thanks. Tintin (talk) 06:31, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bombay/Mumbai

The population of Bombay is not, and will not be 18 million for some time. Your mistake has lasted on that page for quite a while. BethelRunner 15:08, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pune International Literary Festival

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pune International Literary Festival requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dom from Paris (talk) 08:43, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Hello, I'm Domdeparis. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Pune International Literary Festival have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Dom from Paris (talk) 08:44, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am not in any way connected with PILF. I have not advertised it at all. A bare minimum of information was provided in my article. Please tell me how to escalate this matter. Other festivals in India all have pages so why has PILF been singled out? Please tell me whom I can discuss this matter with.

Pune International Literary Festival

Hello, I just deleted your article about Pune International Literary Festival. I saw your messages about how Pune International Literary Festival is "an eminent litfest" and you feel it should be featured. Unfortunately, the article I deleted did not sufficently demonstrate that this particular festival is notable as that word is used in Wikipeda to have an article, and the article sounded like it was trying to promote or advertise the festival.

If you would like to try again, here's what you need to do.

Use the draft namespace to work on the draft so that it's not subject to immediate deletion. The fact that the article has now been deleted twice in mainspace means that any article that does not go through an acceptance process is unlikely to survive.
You say that the festival has gotten a lot of press coverage. That's good, that means it's more likely to be notable. However, all of the information you put in the article should cite the reliable sources that you got it from.
Avoid using unnecessarily flattering language. Peacock terms often give the impression that you are trying to advertise or promote something.
When you have a draft together and you think it's ready, put {{subst:submit}} at the top of the draft and someone from AFC will come along and review it. If you want me to take a look at it first, I will. Just ask me on my talk page. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 19:43, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's disappointing to know that the article on the Pune International Literary Festival did not meet Wikipedia standards. I had cited two national newspapers where the news was covered and two famous personalities who had inaugurated the festival in 2017 and 2018. I had given a link to the government location where this festival is held every year. This is more than say, what the Kerala Lit Fest has done but that article has not been deleted. My article has as much authenticity as the Jaipur lit fest though I am not saying that the PILF is as great as that. I stated facts and there was no advertising, not even a bit. I have no idea what was in the first article on PILF as I have not read it. I find the deletion most unfair as the article I posted had good credentials. PILF is a notable festival in India and I gave proof of it. Is there any way to access the deleted article so I can ask for a review? There is no point in me writing a draft article as it will be identical to the one I wrote earlier. NitajkNitajk (talk) 01:49, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the article in draft space at Draft:Pune International Literary Festival. I restored the whole history, so you can see what was deleted before your version in case there is anything salvageable from that. Your version does not cite any sources. Please read some of the links I've left for you so you can understand sourcing better. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 04:46, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. Let me think about it and see if I can find better sources although at this point of time I cannot think of better sources than major national dailies of India, links to famous people who have inaugurated the festival, and the Maharashtra government location link. Let me search for more sources. Nitajk Nitajk (talk) 04:55, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've made some edits to the page. I moved the two news article links down to the reference section where they belong, and moved the link to the homepage and venue to the external links section. I also added some information from one of the sources that you did not include in the article but which strengthens the argument for including the article. Lastly I added citation needed tags by sentences or paragraphs that don't cite sources, so you can focus on finding sources for that information. I hope seeing what I did helps you understand what we're looking for. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 05:23, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this. I am afraid I am not tech-savvy and am struggling to figure out how to do this stuff. It took some time to know that I had to edit this section to reply. I will work on what you mentioned. Nitajk (talk) 07:09, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have made several changes to the draft page of the PILF. Please can wikipedia review this on an urgent basis? Thanks. Nitajk (talk) 05:49, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pune International Literary Festival (August 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

too promotional

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pune International Literary Festival and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pune International Literary Festival, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:04, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nitajk! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 09:04, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pune International Literary Festival

Hello, Nitajk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pune International Literary Festival".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 18:51, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pune International Literary Festival has been accepted

Pune International Literary Festival, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Atlantic306 (talk) 22:38, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maj Gen SCN Jatar (October 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

External links should be removed, and replaced with references where appropriate. See WP:EASYREFBEGIN for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maj Gen SCN Jatar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 15:41, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maj Gen SCN Jatar (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not quite enough independent, significant coverage but the article also needs work. The lead isn't supposed to be bigger than the body of the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maj Gen SCN Jatar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 18:54, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sudhir Chintamani Nilkanth Jatar

Hello, Nitajk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Sudhir Chintamani Nilkanth Jatar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:42, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]