User talk:NiciVampireHeart/Archive 29
This is an archive of past discussions about User:NiciVampireHeart. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | → | Archive 35 |
Disambiguation link notification for January 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Sylvain Grenier (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to RDS and Hawkesbury
- Don Joyce (American football) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Baltimore Colts
- Kris Pavone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Hillsborough County
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
- All fixed. NiciVampireHeart 11:31, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 07 January 2013
- WikiProject report: Where Are They Now? Episode IV: A New Year
- News and notes: 2012—the big year
- Featured content: Featured content in review
- Technology report: Looking ahead to 2013
WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)!
WikiWomen - We need you! | |
---|---|
Hi NiciVampireHeart! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more! Get involved by:
Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 00:58, 10 January 2013 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for January 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sassy Stephie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sleeper hold (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
I think it is especially valuable to keep this cropped image up because WWE seems to be replacing fixed images with links in their news summaries with links to video clips. The original isn't even there anymore, so only we have it. Ranze (talk) 23:21, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
- I guess I'm trying to figure out what a valid source would be. The images we have for tag teams like Bellas/Usos, were they uploaded by fans who took them at events as opposed to the ones on WWE.com which I assume is taken by their official photographers? Are fans even allowed to own photographs taken at events? Ranze (talk) 19:36, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Kewl so like, you found ones fans took at events oversees, even of refs and stuff? I am thinking if we find pics of the Scholars perhaps we should have 2, 1 when they initially formed up (sans moustache) and then another after Cody's return from injury with the moustache and when they began to wear more similar attire. Ranze (talk) 16:08, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 January 2013
- Investigative report: Ship ahoy! New travel site finally afloat
- News and notes: Launch of annual picture competition, new grant scheme
- WikiProject report: Reach for the Stars: WikiProject Astronomy
- Discussion report: Flag Manual of Style; accessibility and equality
- Special report: Loss of an Internet genius
- Featured content: Featured articles: Quality of reviews, quality of writing in 2012
- Arbitration report: First arbitration case in almost six months
- Technology report: Intermittent outages planned, first Wikidata client deployment
It's officially listed at http://thescoretv.ca/talent how come you removed it from his page? Ranze (talk) 04:51, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Karl Gotch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike DiBiase (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Overlinking
Hi, thanks for your work on en.WP. Please note that we don't normally link years, dates, common terms, and common country-names. Cheers. Tony (talk) 04:28, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 January 2013
- News and notes: Requests for adminship reform moves forward
- WikiProject report: Say What? — WikiProject Linguistics
- Featured content: Wazzup, G? Delegates and featured topics in review
- Arbitration report: Doncram case continues
- Technology report: Data centre switchover a tentative success
Sterling James Keenan
Is there any reason why you reverted my removal of abandoned links. I mean, I absolutely hate seeing so many. Is there a rule about this that I am unaware of? GamingWithStatoke (talk) 11:34, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
- I've no idea what you mean when you say "abandoned links"? Are you referring to red links? In any case, my revert on SJK was more for structure and layout reasons than anything else. The current structure is more logical imo than the one you implemented. For example, 2008 (eight years following his debut) you decided fitted into the "early career" section, which is actually kind of baffling. Eight years in and you're still in your early career? Regardless, if you feel you simply must remove the redlinks (which is quite contrary to WP:REDLINK unless you're convined none of the red links will ever have an article), the by all means go ahead, but please try not to completely change the layout the article while doing so. NiciVampireHeart 14:43, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah I was going to fix that but got distracted by another edit I was doing simultaneously, well thanks for the information on red links, I just sometimes think that first of that too many makes the article look bad, personal preference I guess, and secondaly some can be so irrelevant that they will not make it on Wikipedia such as Troy Lords.GamingWithStatoke (talk) 15:15, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 January 2013
- In the media: Hoaxes draw media attention
- Recent research: Lessons from the research literature on open collaboration; clicks on featured articles; credibility heuristics
- WikiProject report: Checkmate! — WikiProject Chess
- Discussion report: Administrator conduct and requests
- News and notes: Khan Academy's Smarthistory and Wikipedia collaborate
- Featured content: Listing off progress from 2012
- Arbitration report: Doncram continues
- Technology report: Developers get ready for FOSDEM amid caching problems
The Signpost: 04 February 2013
- Special report: Examining the popularity of Wikipedia articles
- News and notes: Article Feedback Tool faces community resistance
- WikiProject report: Land of the Midnight Sun
- Featured content: Portal people on potent potables and portable potholes
- In the media: Star Trek Into Pedantry
- Technology report: Wikidata team targets English Wikipedia deployment
The Signpost: 11 February 2013
- Featured content: A lousy week
- WikiProject report: Just the Facts
- In the media: Wikipedia mirroring life in island ownership dispute
- Discussion report: WebCite proposal
- Technology report: Wikidata client rollout stutters
The Signpost: 18 February 2013
- WikiProject report: Thank you for flying WikiProject Airlines
- Technology report: Better templates and 3D buildings
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation declares 'victory' in Wikivoyage lawsuit
- In the media: Sue Gardner interviewed by the Australian press
- Featured content: Featured content gets schooled
Briscoe Brother
It was a while ago that I got a message about changing something, but I think it was about changing Jay Briscoe's birthday. It said something about citing a source, not sure how to do that, but the source was/is his Facebook page. Wikipedia lists the wrong day as his birthday. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.62.11.118 (talk) 04:44, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 February 2013
- Recent research: Wikipedia not so novel after all, except to UK university lecturers
- News and notes: "Very lucky" Picture of the Year
- Discussion report: Wikivoyage links; overcategorization
- Featured content: Blue birds be bouncin'
- WikiProject report: How to measure a WikiProject's workload
- Technology report: Wikidata development to be continued indefinitely
The Signpost: 04 March 2013
- News and notes: Outing of editor causes firestorm
- Featured content: Slow week for featured content
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Television Stations
The Signpost: 11 March 2013
- From the editor: Signpost–Wikizine merger
- News and notes: Finance committee updates
- Featured content: Batman, three birds and a Mercedes
- Arbitration report: Doncram case closes; arbitrator resigns
- WikiProject report: Setting a precedent
- Technology report: Article Feedback reversal
The Signpost: 18 March 2013
- News and notes: Resigning arbitrator slams Committee
- WikiProject report: Making music
- Featured content: Wikipedia stays warm
- Arbitration report: Richard case closes
- Technology report: Visual Editor "on schedule"
The Signpost: 25 March 2013
- WikiProject report: The 'Burgh: WikiProject Pittsburgh
- Featured content: One and a half soursops
- Arbitration report: Two open cases
- News and notes: Sue Gardner to leave WMF; German Wikipedians spearhead another effort to close Wikinews
- Technology report: The Visual Editor: Where are we now, and where are we headed?
Hiya Hiya
I would like to be reinstated to Professional Wrestling Wikipedia Project newsletter since I am now more active on Wikipedia now than I was previously. Note to wise, clean up once a while on your talk page, it looks like a pile of rubbish pile (in my honest opinion). Sundogs talk page sandbox 02:16, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 01 April 2013
- Special report: Who reads which Wikipedia?
- WikiProject report: Special: FAQs
- Featured content: What the ?
- Arbitration report: Three open cases
- Technology report: Wikidata phase 2 deployment timetable in doubt
The Signpost: 08 April 2013
- Wikizine: WMF scales back feature after outcry
- WikiProject report: Earthshattering WikiProject Earthquakes
- News and notes: French intelligence agents threaten Wikimedia volunteer
- Arbitration report: Subject experts needed for Argentine History
- Featured content: Wikipedia loves poetry
- Technology report: Testing week
The Signpost: 15 April 2013
- WikiProject report: Unity in Diversity: South Africa
- News and notes: Another admin reform attempt flops
- Featured content: The featured process swings into high gear
The Signpost: 22 April 2013
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Editor Retention
- News and notes: Milan conference a mixed bag
- Featured content: Batfish in the Red Sea
- Arbitration report: Sexology case nears closure after stalling over topic ban
- Technology report: A flurry of deployments
The Signpost: 29 April 2013
- News and notes: Chapter furore over FDC knockbacks; First DC GLAM boot-camp
- In the media: Wikipedia's sexism; Yuri Gadyukin hoax
- Featured content: Wiki loves video games
- WikiProject report: Japanese WikiProject Baseball
- Traffic report: Most popular Wikipedia articles
- Arbitration report: Sexology closed; two open cases
- Recent research: Sentiment monitoring; UNESCO and systemic bias; and more
- Technology report: New notifications system deployed across Wikipedia
The Signpost: 06 May 2013
- Technology report: Foundation successful in bid for larger Google subsidy
- Featured content: WikiCup update: full speed ahead!
- WikiProject report: Earn $100 in cash... and a button!
The Signpost: 13 May 2013
- News and notes: WMF–community ruckus on Wikimedia mailing list
- WikiProject report: Knock Out: WikiProject Mixed Martial Arts
- Featured content: A mushroom, a motorway, a Munich gallery, and a map
- In the media: PR firm accused of editing Wikipedia for government clients; can Wikipedia predict the stock market?
- Arbitration report: Race and politics opened; three open cases
May 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to One Night Stand (2007) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:42, 19 May 2013 (UTC)