User talk:Ranze

This user is a participant in WikiProject Professional wrestling.

This user is a member of
WikiProject Tokusatsu

Archives: /2012, /2013, /2014, /2015, /2016, /2017, /2018

diffs: Special:Diff/1

Template:Arbitration enforcement appeal for later

AMAs/Reddit https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/02/

Wikipedia:Credible claim of significance also is interesting for avoiding premature speedy deletion nominations

Wikipedia:REFILL looks very useful for times when I can only post bare URLs due to editing via a crappy tablet.

Sourcing: Template:Find sources + WP:RS + Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard +Wikipedia:WikiProject_Video_games/Sources#List ~~+Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Sources aka WP:PW/RS~~

old Teletoon air dates: ftp://support.crtc.gc.ca/logs/ or http://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/800106c1-0b08-401e-8be2-ac45d62e662e

redirects per special:diff/743903193 use Wikipedia:Article wizard/Redirect to post at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects and log at user:ranze/redirects along with WP:RFD contributions. As clarified December 18 in special:diff/755529610 I can ping Thryduulf if there is a comment to add on RFD.

Orphaned non-free image File:GravityBoots1984augustArchie'sGirls331.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GravityBoots1984augustArchie'sGirls331.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:33, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

message to BBB

@Bbb23: first a public service inquiry here. At Talk:Men's rights movement/Article probation you had posted:

{{User:Ranze}} blocked for 24 hours for violating WP:1RR in the MRM section of Controversial Reddit communities.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:28, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent creation of a userpage for me has resulted in the category you've added to my userpage also being added to that talk page. I don't know if it might be possible to add a "noinclude" or full colon prior to the username to prevent that category transclusion disrupting the page?

Second: I noticed special:diff/863739039 and how User:RatatoskJones linked to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Tyciol/Archive#12_July_2018 and am trying to understand why you are being more assertive in adding me to Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Tyciol whereas you merely added User:ScratchMarshall to Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Tyciol. I acknowledge that you have suspicions based on interest overlap (is it uncommon for WWE fans to like weightlifting?) but I think it is useful to be more apprehensive about leaping to conclusions like this. What is the basis of your "proven"?

I appeal to you that I do not deserve to be blocked, as I am innocent and a good-willed Wikipedia contributor. Ranze (talk) 14:19, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Witch girl for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Witch girl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Witch girl until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:05, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Linda Lusk for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Linda Lusk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linda Lusk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GPL93 (talk) 20:39, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Phodes" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Phodes. Since you had some involvement with the Phodes redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 14:11, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of L.O.S.E.R.S.

The article L.O.S.E.R.S. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a disambiguation page, both partial-title matches for redirects. Unsure if this minor fictional element should be merged into List of The Fairly OddParents characters or not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 23:25, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 8chan (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 8chan (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/8chan (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Geolodus (talk) 19:14, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Lillian Gay" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lillian Gay. Since you had some involvement with the Lillian Gay redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. gnu 57 02:35, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:InfiniteChan∞chanLogo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:InfiniteChan∞chanLogo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Werewolves in anime and manga has been nominated for discussion

Category:Werewolves in anime and manga, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 16:21, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Werewolves in animated television has been nominated for discussion

Category:Werewolves in animated television, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 16:22, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Werewolves in animation has been nominated for discussion

Category:Werewolves in animation, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 16:25, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"God of Blood" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect God of Blood. Since you had some involvement with the God of Blood redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesome Hwyh 16:41, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"WWX" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect WWX. Since you had some involvement with the WWX redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:31, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Peg Bowen" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Peg Bowen. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 15#Peg Bowen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 09:41, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TheBoyByGermaineGreer.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheBoyByGermaineGreer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:44, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lists of fictional robots has been nominated for merging

Category:Lists of fictional robots has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 22:11, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Sheuneen Ta" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Sheuneen Ta. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 6#Sheuneen Ta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Narky Blert (talk) 12:48, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of winged horses for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of winged horses is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of winged horses until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 22:26, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Method Animation

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Method Animation, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 180.248.118.218 (talk) 00:23, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Animated characters in film has been nominated for renaming

Category:Animated characters in film has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:26, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Violence against men for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Violence against men is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Violence against men (5th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Tambor de Tocino (talk) 01:10, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Wavedashing" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wavedashing and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 30#Wavedashing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 19:04, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Ephebo" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Ephebo has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 25 § Ephebo until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:56, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Morgan Rice for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Morgan Rice is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morgan Rice until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 10:14, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Vampires in animated television has been nominated for renaming

Category:Vampires in animated television has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. (Oinkers42) (talk) 22:56, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of unicorns for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of unicorns is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of unicorns until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

▶ I am Grorp ◀ 00:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lists of Emmerdale characters has been nominated for renaming

Category:Lists of Emmerdale characters has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JuniperChill (talk) 12:35, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Sufferin' succotash" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Sufferin' succotash has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 8 § Sufferin' succotash until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 17:59, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]