This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.

Wondering why your article was speedily deleted? Check this list first.

Do you want to move a page that I've move-protected? Discuss the move first on the article's talk page. If there's a consensus for the move, let me know and I'll unlock the page.

Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).

_________

Hello you delete my page "http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Baer/" because it wasn't usefull; however, I was not done editing it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Buenotaco55 (talk • contribs) 14:40, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The3Eds.com is a VERY important website. Get off Wikipedia and check it out. Please put it back up! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Digitalworldmaster (talk • contribs) 21:30, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MY PAGE!

I CAN NOT BEL-LEVE YOU! YOU DELETEDMY USERPAGE:( Andy accounts (talk) 14:00, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What just happened?

Professori Aarne Halmeen johtama automaatiotekniikan tutkimusryhmä on mukana tekniikan alan EXPO21XX-virtuaalimessuilla. Messuille on avattu uusi tutkimusta esittelevä halli automaation siipeen. Tutkimusryhmän virtuaaliständillä esitellään ryhmän kehittämiä robotteja. Ständiltä löytyy mm. videoesittely WorkPartner-robotista. Kutsu osallistumisesta tuli suoraan messujärjestäjiltä, jotka hoitivat myös ständin pystytyksen. Tutkimusständeistä ei aiheudu kuluja, vaan ne katetaan messujärjestäjien hankkimalla EU-rahoituksella. TKK:n lisäksi messuilla on mukana tutkimusryhmiä Englannista, Saksasta, Ruotsista, Yhdysvalloista ja Ranskasta.

I am wondering why you keep on deleting this particular platform, we have specifically designed for robotics departments world wide to showcase their research to potential students on one platform, all free of charge. If you take a look at this platform, you would notice that it has nothing to do with "blatant advertising" as you call it, but rather an information platform with contributions from some of the best brains in the field of robotics world wide. Now, tell me! If you accept the inclusion of the name KUKA, a top robotic production firm in the world, cannot it be termed as "blatant advertising?" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Squart (talk • contribs) 10:41, 5 June 2008 (UTC) disruptive edits? why not tell me str8 up what is wrong with the content when pages like[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twins_%28pornographic_film%29

are allowed but mine isnt. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Codyofga (talk • contribs) 17:33, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Epygi

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Epygi, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? BJ^Talk 10:16, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re All My Goodness

Seeing as I have very recently indef blocked the (re)creator of the above article for... um... recreating the article after it being deleted twice, I should just like your confirmation that I should now unblock User:Leahpar and eat of some crow upon their talkpage. Cheers. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:27, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am even now picking my teeth with a quill with black feathers... LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:40, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Bison

Hello, How come you deleted my article on the Web Series Jeremy Bison? From What I can tell it does not void the terms of use. It is informitive about this young man and gives good facts for wikipedia users looking for more information on Jeremy. I am not Jeremy himself, so therefor I am not advertising myself nor am I advertising him. I am plainly giving other facts about Jeremy and his web series.

Please contact me at jhberson@gmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drumsruledaworld (talk • contribs) 23:42, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zdzisław Kaczmarczyk

Is there any specific reason why a non-controversial article such as this one cannot have a prod tag placed on it? (>O_o)> Something X <(^_^<) 14:58, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

US Democrats Nominee

My Apologise, it will not happen again.

--Thomassampson (talk) 17:08, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Francis grave

Hi there. I was patrolling the new pages and this one popped up. While I was tagging it with the expansion template, I think it got deleted. Then by the time i completed the tagging, I seemed to have created the article with just the tag! If that now makes me the author of the page, as far as I'm concerned it can be speedily deleted! Ged UK (talk) 17:13, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heads up

Sorry to bother, but someone didn't quite take your warning seriously: [1]. Merci. Ecoleetage (talk) 17:39, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that was fast! Thanks! :) Ecoleetage (talk) 17:49, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clonakilty AFC

Howdy, I think the article Clonakilty AFC did assert notability (recent championship, linked from Clonakilty I believe, but I can't see deleted contributions). Also I think the article was nominated for speedy and declined. Can you check? JackSchmidt (talk) 18:46, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Glad my memory was correct. I've been stub sorting a wide range of pitiful articles and usually check if they warrant speedy deletes or prods. I figure lots of these will eventually be deleted or merged by wikiprojects, but I like to let the subject experts decide what to do with the articles if they are not just obvious trash. At least for new math articles, I've been surprised at how many "good looking" articles were trash and how many dictionary definitions were notable and easy to fix to start class, so I figure soccer stubs must be just as weird. JackSchmidt (talk) 19:43, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wilson

I have done so by now. The move should not be controversial. A man should not be deprived of his first name. Str1977 ^(talk) 21:01, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If that is so it's a shame. People have a right not to have their names mutilated by depriving them of a first name. Sure, Al Gore not filed under "Albert Gore Jr." but neither is he simply "Gore". Str1977 ^(talk) 21:07, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But Woodrow is not actual christian name but his mothers maiden name. The current president or his father are not filed under "Walker Bush". Str1977 ^(talk) 21:24, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'll see whether anyone disagrees. Str1977 ^(talk) 21:29, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You cited your opinion that the policy supports Woodrow Wilson instead of his actual name including the first name. I base myself on no other policy but hold a different opinion.

PS. Your disagreement (posted on the talk page) is now noted as opposed to before, when I had not seen your comment there and only had your edit summary which didn't bring a substantial opposition but only talked about a lack of consensus.

BTW, any further discussion should be on the talk page and not on user talk pages. Str1977 ^(talk) 21:53, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage

Hi. Just a note: your userpage has been vandalised 24 times within the past 3 weeks (average - one every 21 hours). Would you like to semi-protect it, to lower the vandalism? Or, can it be reverted easily and quickly because many users are watching your userpage on their watchlist (myself included)? Thanks. ~A H 1^(TCU) 21:05, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're my hero

After a night of chasing down this guy's socks, you made my night with this edit. You're my new Wiki hero. hehe. Cheers! Redfarmer (talk) 02:40, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

d'oh - you beat me to it

User_talk:68.217.248.180 was going to be my first non-test blockee. Quick question though, since one of his vandalisms was to my user page, should I have let another admin do it? Or is it only a COI when there's been a good-faith editing dispute? xenocidic (talk) 15:51, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, no problem at all. After that last bit of racism, he definitely needed blocked asap. Thanks for the advice, and the welcome! xenocidic (talk) 15:55, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Curious - that vandal added some random phone number on Gary King's page, I deleted the revision. I don't think oversight is necessary in this case, is it? xenocidic (talk) 17:06, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gyst article - deletion

Hi, you deleted an article I had heavily contributed to as well, (Gyst) and it was completely apposite for wikipedia - factual, unbiased, and informative about a small organisation (well i thought so at any rate) - why did you delete it? Do problems arise from having too many articles on wikipedia, or were you just being stingy? I've generally had good experiences with Wikipedia so I'm presuming its the former... willval123 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Willval123 (talk • contribs) 17:23, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ok, so an article must be centred on a significant item - is that just wikipedia's policy or is there a reason? this is just curiosity now, by the by, don't worry about replying if you're busy...

ok - apologies for wasting your time —Preceding unsigned comment added by Willval123 (talk • contribs) 17:37, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS - i wasnt talking about myself, just to clarify if you think i'm a complete goon... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Willval123 (talk • contribs) 17:57, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

is this the sort of thing that you might be looking for notability wise? http://www.lfo.org.uk/html/twelfth_night.html (but with more references of course)--Willval123 (talk) 19:21, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

You delete my page "http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/AcmePlan".
Why pages of the similar companies/products are not removed?
Omniplan [[2]]
List of project management software [[3]]
Artemis [[4]]
Primavera [[5]]
Microsoft Project [[6]]
Merlin [[7]]
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.252.10.168 (talk) 18:15, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Crannefo

He's requesting unblock, now posting an unblock request that seems to demonstrate an understanding of what he did wrong. I feel he was probably acting in good faith and considering an unblock (an indef block seems a little much for a first offense). Any thoughts from you? Daniel Case (talk) 03:06, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gamah Watch

Hello, I re-created the Gamah Watch page which you deleted earlier, and tried to add more information about its significance. Can I do anything to improve it? Though small currently, the owners do have contact with Nintendo, and are in the process of recieving games to try out and review, which would generate much more traffic, and also increase its significance. Sorry about the lack of quality in the original page, but there was a lack of time then and we have since improved it. Hopefully this one will suffice. Thanks, -Thebaldone —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.76.15.140 (talk) 03:10, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

u deleted my article

dude. u could have jsut sent a message to me asking for why it was there. no need to go postal and delete it all together. it was a legitimate article.... u cant bring it back nby any chance and ill fil in the importance section?

Sully89 (talk) 10:52, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanx for understanding, im sorta new at thsi whole thing

Sully89 (talk) 10:57, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i have 2 referances, is that enough?

Sully89 (talk) 11:14, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

so wat do i need? the site has only been going for 1 year... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sully89 (talk • contribs) 11:40, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

wat about an idependant forum?

Sully89 (talk) 11:44, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

come on mate, throw me a bone.... its not my game personally, i just wanna get a decent wiki up for it.... u can see its legit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sully89 (talk • contribs) 11:47, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

so i need to find it mentioned on a third party website? just the one?

Sully89 (talk) 11:53, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

emailed the developer and got them. :D:D

Sully89 (talk) 12:03, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GPLpedia.com Open Source Software

GPLpedia.com is an Open SOurce Software System that lets users all over the world collaborate and contribute towards promoting Open Source Software. Agreed this is a new website, but I think the intent is absolutely genuine and quite novel. The quality of the website is great. I think it should be apart of wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.144.36.2 (talk) 17:03, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TheInvisibleMachine11

The user you just blocked is almost assuredly a sock of User:GSNGuy. This individual has many socks with the "Machine" reference and targets User:Mrschimpf's page regularly. (Also mine, but I'm not on his happy list this week, I guess.) Thanks for getting rid of him...Should I file an SSP, a checkuser, or ??? Gladys J Cortez 19:22, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

wOOt...thanks for tagging him! (One of these days we'll get him all rounded up under one sockmaster heading...I think he's listed under at least 2 or 3 masters right now, which offends my sense of neatness. However, my sense of neatness could fit in a very small teacup, so make of it what you will.) I'll be on the lookout for further incarnations....thanks again!Gladys J Cortez 19:49, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you stick a sockpuppet/Gsnguy tag on his page also since it's FP'ed? He also tried to get my password through a request email; I do have his IP from that. Nate • (chatter) 20:26, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you...

'..for fixing my stuff, after that lunatic swept through wikipedia like a tornado. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 20:33, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I ditto the thanks. Wow, what a vandal.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 22:50, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Me too. Full-on loon – thanks heaps, Julia Rossi (talk) 01:07, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion Avoidance

Hi, is there a page that decribes what constitutes advertising and what doesn't, my page Giancarlo Caldesi was just removed and I'd like to clean it up according to your criteria. It was meant to be factual. Cheers.

How to choose cordless drill

Hi, I've just prod'd it, however I then noticed that you have deleted it twice already. Feel free to do so again> Incidentally under what speedy criteria can I place this if it appears again? -- Roleplayer (talk) 12:43, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Giancarlo Caldesi

Hi, I have revised the article should I just repost and see what happens or you could preview it here User:Uberginger/Giancarlo Caldesi. I have tried to keep it in keeping with a similar celebrity Gino D'Acampo. —Preceding comment was added at 13:42, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Found poetry

Hey. I noticed you reverted some vandalism on found poetry a while back, and wondered if you could please put on your watchlist, since it seems to go through spats of test edits sometimes. If not, that's cool, if so, thanks. --Justpassin (talk) 01:08, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Block of 71.107.184.247

Thanks. It comes back as a Verizon account as did a similar block yesterday with the same MO. We may have an idiot kid with a bot on our hands. Thanks for clobbering him. I'll raise a beignet in your honor the next time I'm in Downtown Disney. :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:08, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The litle freak is still at it on the talk page. Kids and computers just don't mix at times. :( Thanks again. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:12, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I came to the same conclusion after I thought about it a little longer. For all I know, the kid has no idea he's been blocked. Good call. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:15, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. What I'm thinking is that he's chomping down on a PB&J thinking all the while that his bot is wreaking havoc...when it isn't. Guess we get the last laugh after all! --PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:18, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You da man. Would you settle for a cookie until I can get to that Ralph Brennan's Jazz Kitchen beignet...? --PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:28, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PMDrive1061 (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Regarding a block

Looking at User talk:Ғгоѕтеԁ Ѡѕ; not sure what prompted the block. Get a feeling checkuser was involved, or there's a connection to other activity I haven't found quickly. – Luna Santin (talk) 22:33, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Had thought that was probably the case, but doesn't hurt to ask. Thanks. – Luna Santin (talk) 23:27, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shopit (should reconsider deletion)

I saw that you deleted the page for shopit and I wanted to discuss its notability. I looked over the previous version and agree that it was written as an advertisement but believe that meets the notability threshold. It is the leader in the profile e-commerce business, perhaps not a segment that is known to everyone, but one that has garnered substantial press recently. You can google them if you would like... Also, I know that they are one of the top facebook applications (as sad as it is this is a very good measurement) and they have inked substantial deals with netvibes and wyclef jean. Please let me know your thoughts - I would be happy to write a non-advertising description of the company for your approval. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wjohn928 (talk • contribs) 06:10, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked--Hu12 (talk) 13:56, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Jimbo Wales

Currently someone is posting this everywhere on 4chan:

Please go to http://wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=B&action=edit&oldid=218337043 and click "Save page."

If you can get that edit expunged it might slow them down some, since they would have to switch to another URL. --Ryan Delaney ^talk 06:13, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RS?

Can you please tell if this article can be used as RS or not? I am confused. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 11:37, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ponticulus

i can under stand your deletion of ponticulus but i would like to know how to make it noteworthy to you you see it hasnt sought sessation from ireland and so there is nothing on it so i thought i would write something. Hisroyalhighnesskingy (talk) 11:43, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thats the problem there isnt any thing i could find on it...anywhere and it isnt mine im only a citizen there is there no way it can stay as THE referance instead of the referanced —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hisroyalhighnesskingy (talk • contribs) 11:48, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ok then if i find something on it can i keep the page then, sorry about all this by the way. Hisroyalhighnesskingy (talk) 11:53, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On deletion of Fly Communications article

I'm trying to get the article on Fly Communications published.

I appreciate the idea that Wikipedia is not the place to advertise. However, how does one walk the fine line to report on progress in successful techniques of advertising. I think this kind of progress has important intellectual value, just as the recognition of how our individual tastes for "nostalgia" are cultivated ... yes, it only seems like advertisers use this "nostaglia" theory, but it does reflect something inherent in human nature. Likewise, the firm has successfully combined these two conflicting approaches (direct marketing, which involves a call-to-action, and branding, which involves an emotional connection). And I believe that Fly was one of the first firms to combine these successfully.

Thus, I believe it is worthy of publication.

Regarding, the idea that the article in question is "advertising" something, this is not the case. The article does not "advertise" any product or service, but the article is about the advertising industry and a company that has pioneered a particular approach.

An easy way to demonstrate that this article is NOT advertising is to pretend the article were about a firm that were to pioneer the combination of baking soda (used by bakers) and vinegar (used by salad chefs) to produce a chemical result that could be used with childrens' Science Fair projects illustrating volcanoes and their lava flow. The fact that is has become popular does not diminish the experimentation and success with combining features of separate disciplines (bakers vs. salad chefs).

Considering that the article is not intended to advertise, what kind of improvements do you suggest to make it suitable? Clearly, Wikipedia has articles on companies and other companies in the advertising industry ... maybe a little explanation of improvement would help me make the article suitable to Wikipedia standards.

Thanks in advance for your suggestions and help.

Farance (talk) 17:13, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

deletion of Fly Communications page

I'm trying to get the article on Fly Communications published.

I appreciate the idea that Wikipedia is not the place to advertise. However, how does one walk the fine line to report on progress in successful techniques of advertising. I think this kind of progress has important intellectual value, just as the recognition of how our individual tastes for "nostalgia" are cultivated ... yes, it only seems like advertisers use this "nostaglia" theory, but it does reflect something inherent in human nature. Likewise, the firm has successfully combined these two conflicting approaches (direct marketing, which involves a call-to-action, and branding, which involves an emotional connection). And I believe that Fly was one of the first firms to combine these successfully.

Thus, I believe it is worthy of publication.

Regarding, the idea that the article in question is "advertising" something, this is not the case. The article does not "advertise" any product or service, but the article is about the advertising industry and a company that has pioneered a particular approach.

An easy way to demonstrate that this article is NOT advertising is to pretend the article were about a firm that were to pioneer the combination of baking soda (used by bakers) and vinegar (used by salad chefs) to produce a chemical result that could be used with childrens' Science Fair projects illustrating volcanoes and their lava flow. The fact that is has become popular does not diminish the experimentation and success with combining features of separate disciplines (bakers vs. salad chefs).

Considering that the article is not intended to advertise, what kind of improvements do you suggest to make it suitable? Clearly, Wikipedia has articles on companies and other companies in the advertising industry ... maybe a little explanation of improvement would help me make the article suitable to Wikipedia standards.

Thanks in advance for your suggestions and help.

Farance (talk) 17:11, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nexxnow Inc.

Thanks for undeleting that page; I moved it to the user's userspace with a note on how to improve it. We'll see what ends up happening, but I appreciate the chance to fix it up. Thanks! UltraExactZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 21:07, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Return of Ponticulus?

As you seem to have been involved in deleting what sounds like same thing in main namespace before. I don't suppose you know what should be done about User:Pontîculus page which is currently showing up as an orphan and has disambig page links. -Hunting dog (talk) 22:43, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Crunchyroll

you deleted the thing while I was doing more research on it... Pyromania153 (talk) 03:52, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Justification...

Hi Just to say the edit on Barrack Obama's page was done by some pranksters who got hold of password. I've changed it and I only want to help. Thanks - magicman92 (talk) 07:22, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=Partyvan Man, you are fast. Keep up the good work! Thingg ^⊕^⊗ 17:23, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wondering why

Hello, Today you deleted a article I put up about Dakota Jackson..Im not quite sure why.I am a interior design student and was putting a page up about a designer I like and whose work I respect. He is well known in the design world and I am not working for him. I was also interested in putting up other well known designers wikipedia does not have. Please explain to me what I did wrong and how I can fix this I can be reached at Jessicaguttenburg@yahoo.com.

Thanks So Much, Jessica —Preceding unsigned comment added by JessicaGuttenburg1 (talk • contribs) 17:28, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes but how is someone supposed to get something printable on that topic? Everything about it is online. I mean does the internet not account for anything? Apparently not. But I mean are there any internet sources someone can use like blogs or something? Also don't write sarcastically to me, I don't like that. Thanks a lot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Codyofga (talk • contribs) 17:37, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So if I have an idea as to make it reliable without it being whatever can I make another attempt at making the page without being blocked? Because it says I will be blocked if I try it again.Codyofga (talk) 17:45, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think my page is ready I forgot to copy a link to that test page thinggy you gave me but I think you may have it already.```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by Codyofga (talk • contribs) 17:53, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I found a reliable source its online but its a news post check out the page now please —Preceding unsigned comment added by Codyofga (talk • contribs) 18:22, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Their film brtherhood secrets is already out. and does it have to be multiple films why not just one? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Codyofga (talk • contribs) 18:30, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

wouldnt they meet the 2nd standard being the 1st gay triplets in porn? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Codyofga (talk • contribs) 18:35, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Good catch!

Oh thanks! Can't take all the credit, because Richard0612 spotted it on IRC :) weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 20:25, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated recreation of Alexander Michael Smith by User:Thealexweb

User:Thealexweb has repeatedly recreated Alexander Michael Smith. S/he says that they want it left up because "our Head Teacher and the local MP requested it". Should this page be moved to this user's userspace or should it just be deleted? I'm asking you because you've deleted the page twice. Thanks for your advice, Cunard (talk) 19:09, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Types of Professional Wrestling Styles

Just bringing to your attention that the article you speedy deleted 05:29, 8 June 2008, Types of Professional Wrestling Styles had passed an AFD nomination with a conclusion to keep 18:33, 7 June 2008 (UTC), less than 24 hours before your speedy, see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Types_of_Professional_Wrestling_Styles. It seems like someone might have been having a second bite at deletion by tagging the article for speedy after losing at AFD. Regardless, given the unanimous consensus outcome at AFD less than 24 hours earlier, if you believe that the material is questionable, perhaps it would be better to re-list it for AFD again? Thanks! Debate 木 01:50, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Extra 31 hours

You tell 'em! :-) Tan | 39 03:53, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your Block of Alexis49

The article history for Sheikh Abdullah shows that you reverted Alexis49 three times and then blocked them for edit warring. They have now requested an unblock and ask why sanctions were not taken against the persons edits warring with them. That's a good question given that the person edit warring with them did the blocking. On the face of it it appears that you were far too involved to issue any blocks here and I have certainly seen situations similar to this where both parties have been blocked. Please can you review your block and remove it if you feel that you were too involved to do the blocking? If you disagree with this, please can you explain why you do not consider that you were involved because a plain reading of the diffs really suggests to me that you were. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:05, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Spartaz ^Humbug! 14:04, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shawn Little (non-notable)

Thank you. My splitting of the real article got the treatment it deserved, instant obliteration. Happy editing! Chris the speller (talk) 18:25, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clear Glass Records

Please be so kind and do explain why the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clear_Glass_Records has been deleted by you? I've put a tag to hold on for a while and added some reasons of importance on the article talk page as it was proposed in the warning I've received, though you did not reply to me on the talk page and just have erased it without further notice or explanation.I was hoping to discuss the reasons I've provided and I can provide you with more, if needed. I believe that your conduct does not follow Wikipedia Deletion Policy.I'm still hoping to get some explanations from you, or consult with someone who can judge our conflict and dispel my doubts on your level of proficiency. Please do not take it personally, but I've been on Wikipedia for more than 2 years and haven't experienced such perception yet. --Ritter (talk) 19:12, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've commented the brief answer I got from you on my Talk page, would you please respond or we really have to go into WP:DR?--Ritter (talk) 00:19, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Carell page Vandalised

The warning you had sent to the user who vandalised Steve Carell page went unheeded. I've reverted the change, but the user Codi14 needs to be blocked. Salilb (talk) 21:22, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Priestley Riots

Since protection removed, it's been hit 6 times with anon vandalism. Just got blanked in an interesting way, with graphics that overwrite the usual wiki header menu. Points for creativity, but hoping it can become re-protected to slow the tide, please? Have requested at Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection. Thank you, EBY3221 (talk) 22:32, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, so it's been temp, semi, at least while it's tfa. Thanks, signing off EBY3221 (talk) 23:33, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello you delete my page "http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Dallara/" because it wasn't usefull; however, I was not done editing it —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ldallara (talk • contribs) 01:48, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Epygi

I have nominated Epygi, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epygi. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? BJ^Talk 08:51, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spam blacklist

Hello! You added anontalk (dot) com to the spam list but somehow spam bots are still managing to spam the link at the ref desks. Could you take a look over this discussion? Thanks :). Seraphim♥Whipp 12:25, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:HorrorMovieSeries200888888888, sockpuppet of User:Lyle123?

Hi
Can you have a look at User:HorrorMovieSeries200888888888 - since you blocked User:SpyglassEntertainmentWaldenMedianewmogvie20084444 yesterday I think you are familiar with the case?
Thanks & Cheers, Amalthea (talk) 11:45, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Non profit organization guidelines?

Hi
I recently created a page for Michigan Works, which is a non-profit employment agency in Michigan in which I work for. I created them a page, but it was speedily deleted. I know I had on there a lot about the company, but I tried to model it off the other business pages suggested in the tutorials, like Kleenex and Sharpie. So it is advertising... but we don't get money for it... So I guess I am wondering if there are specific guidelines for non profit organizations on Wikipedia?
Thank you! McGregorLove775 (talk) 13:02, 16 June 2008 (UTC)McGregorLove775[reply]

Why did you delete actual gas prices?

Why did you delete actual gas prices? I'm very unhappy that this was deleted, you probably didnt even read it. Everything on it was true and reliable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bboyko (talk • contribs) 14:51, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you deleting - The Former British Republic of Dempsey Land

Hi, you have been deleting a page I am creating, saying its nonsense but it is true check out www.the-brodl.eu.tt Aerican Empire are able to have a page on them why can't The BRoDL have one. Thanks (05dempc (talk) 17:00, 16 June 2008 (UTC))[reply]

It is non-profit websit I have no gain if people visit it and if needed I would take the external link off.

deletion of "Throwback"

Throwback is a notable band from Montreal Canada and has helped create a certain genre of certain music. After discovering the band I decided to look for info on Wikipedia about them and found none. So I made an article. I have used outside sources to verify the information in my article and do not know why it was deleted so "speedily." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xcntryrunna518 (talk • contribs) 19:44, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK I read the notability guidelines and see that throwback does not meet the requirements. I still think they are notable but for convenience sake I will let you guys do your job. Xcntryrunna518 (talk) 19:55, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of navAero The article was written with general information. Only 1 citation of navAero was listed and that was done along with Jeppesen for a project currently in-process. This is not blatant advertising. Please explain your action of deleting this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crowsky (talk • contribs) 22:19, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Soviet UNI

The article on the student-controlled organization Soviet UNI was entirely legitimate. While the name may suggest it is a joke, it is not. The name is a play on the Soviet Union, as the organization was started at University High School, also known as UNI, thus, Soviet UNI. It is a real organization that was established to introduce high school and college students to alternative forms of government including communism, fascism, anarchy, true democracy, etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chasenstark@gmail.com (talk • contribs) 23:10, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of From the pavilion

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on From the pavilion, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because From the pavilion is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting From the pavilion, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 00:32, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trace Cyrus

You were one of several admins to speedy delete the article about Miley Cyrus' half-brother. I have drafted an article in my sandbox (permanent link). His band now has a hit song and he has been interviewed on national shows like MTV's Total Request Live and American Top 40 in the last week. He is subject of numerous articles in major publications like MTV, VH1, and the Los Angeles Times. I think that the answer is obviously yes, but I decided to be cautious since the article had been salted because so many people were posting one or two sentence biographies when he had lesser notability. Do you think that a full deletion review is necessary? I added your talk page to my watchlist. Royal broil 03:58, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Test Cricketers

I've just created an article for Josephine Batson, who played Test cricket for the England women's team. I note that you deleted an article on her in the past, can I point out that all test cricketers are by definition notable on wikipedia because they've played their sport at the highest level. Nick mallory (talk) 04:23, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning

How was your sleep Mr early riser? Can you deal with this speedy delete, its been up for a while, have a nice day. Monster Under Your Bed ^{(talk 2 me)} 11:44, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TheRevCounter

Perhaps it would be a useful idea with a 'speedy deletion' to allow time both for a contestation AND comments to be added to the discussion page verifying WHY it shouldn't be deleted. This was a poor deletion, and did not allow adequate time for due process of the directions given by the site as to what should be done. Talk about trigger-happy (and looks like you have past form). Shame really, past experience of wiki patrol has been positive until now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by El Gordo 78 (talk • contribs) 13:47, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jodie Foster

Why did you warn me about my edit to Jodie Foster? I am just adding an LGBT tag to her name because it is well-known that she is a lesbian. Just because she has not admitted it does not change the facts. I'M SUPER DUPER GOOD! (talk) 14:07, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's factual. Just because Larry Craig hasn't admitted he's gay doesn't change the fact that he is gay even though he was soliciting gay sex in a restroom. —Preceding unsigned comment added by I'M SUPER DUPER GOOD! (talk • contribs) 14:09, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Factuality and verifiability are two different things. See also WP:BLP. --Clubjuggle ^T/C 14:11, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Out.com and nndb have both identified Jodie Foster as a lesbian. —Preceding unsigned comment added by I'M SUPER DUPER GOOD! (talk • contribs) 14:13, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neither of those are reliable sources. They rely on user-supplied content and don't require sources for contributions. Also, please don't forget to sign your posts. --Clubjuggle ^T/C 14:31, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Super duper has been blocked as a vandalism/trolling-only account. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 14:54, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indole chemdata supplement

Hey, you deleted Indole chemdata supplement, just now. I just put a link to the external MSDS there as requested on the indole page. Isn't that is what I was supposed to do? Rangek (talk) 15:15, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your suggestion to just put the link there. But then why does the infobox bring up the edit a new page thinger instead? Rangek (talk) 15:52, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It works now, 'cause I fixed it :) My question was, why does the infobox default to making a new page? Rangek (talk) 20:16, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Need your help

Hi! I just don't know why, but I couldn't revert vandalism on Konvicted. Please rvv. Oda Mari (talk) 16:10, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Happy editing! Oda Mari (talk) 16:14, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted my page Philosphy of Zero. I think you took it quite simplistically. I am not converting a philosphy to something, instead I am giving a right picture of how a civilization evolved around a simple concept like zero. It is evident from lot of ancient text of Indian civilization, though they might not have reference on net for it. Please give me a valid reason for deleting the text other then your ignorance about the concept. Rahul —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahul moondra (talk • contribs) 07:42, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why was Heather Sweazea deleted?

BAL Track Division is not a high school organization. She is not primarily a high school athlete. You know I'm right. Can you rewrite the article? Stevendjc (talk) 16:19, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Nawlin, thanks for your reversion! --Aleen f1 17:34, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Acetone Award

Slakr's Acetone Award

For excellent effort in reverting vandalism, you are hereby awarded some acetone to help scrub out the toughest of attempts at turning articles to mush. Plus, if you ever need to get nail polish off, it'll help with that too. :P

Thanks for helping out. =) --slakr^\ talk / 18:48, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WifiTastic

How did you come up with my article is spam?? If this is blatant advertising then remove FON article as well because it's essentially does the same thing. I wasn't even finish editing my article!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronjohn (talk • contribs) 19:11, 17 June 2008 (UTC) --Ron John[reply]

Can you remove protection so I can put artilce in my own words, so it doesn't appear to be "spam".--Ron John (talk) 20:07, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I never asked for it to be moved to my talk page. I requested that you remove protection, so i can put it in my own words.--Ron John (talk) 20:25, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah FON has 16 references but how long has this artilce been on wiki with how many people working it.............. I just started it and you just deleted my novice work that i really worked on editing —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronjohn (talk • contribs) 20:39, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you keep giving me a hard time. I take time to put it up and you delete it. Atleast mark it for deletion if i don't fix whatever it is you don't like. You barely give me chance to even correct it before you use your position as an administrator to delete it quickly.--Ron John (talk) 21:18, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the user page now. I added some more links and references. Notable what are the standards for notable. Everything I provided is notable and this is something people can read about from an objective stand point. Like orbit downloader article why is that notable it's not even objectional it's totaly for the software. Can you undelete now since i fixed what you asked for. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronjohn (talk • contribs) 22:12, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Forget it you win. I'm tired of working on this for 45 mins and then within mins it get's deleted by you. I'm tired of working on wiki. Everytime I do something my work get's removed delted or whatever. Instead of actually just helping the article or really helping us novice users you guys just kill the morale and make people not want to have any input for wiki. Therefore I will never ever ever ever contribute to wiki again, so you guys with the PHDs can continue to work on wiki while us novice guys just read. (guess the lil guy doesn't win on this one)Ron John (talk) 05:27, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ALSO SINCE YOU THINK WIFITASTIC is so bad remove it from Linksys WRT54G series article under Third-party firmware projects. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronjohn (talk • contribs) 05:42, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the user page now User:Ronjohn/WifiTastic —Preceding comment was added at 10:57, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

No I'm not affliated with them at all. I dont even have an account. However their idea of using opensource wireless software openwrt for users to share their bandwidth and the cost of their internet with neighbors I believe is wiki worth. I did draft an article to the best of my ability but you said it sucked and I'm only a novice user, so I just gave up cause it took me like 45 mins to write it up with all the wiki programming language so to speak and then within minutes you come delete it. I'll work on it one last time....Ron John (talk) 08:18, 20 June 2008 (UTC) IF ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO HELP (DON'T ANYONE REALLY READS DISCUSSION, PLEASE HELP) at User:Ronjohn/WifiTastic--Ron John (talk) 11:00, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just by you referencing CNET as a valid it news source shows me limited knowledge on technology (which I already knew). Like I said before wiki is not what it use to be. Techie guys like myself could create all kinds of articles based on various things in the "technology" field. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronjohn (talk • contribs) 11:52, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rezbiz1/User:georgejoe

He says his new name isn't activated. Might want to take a look about it; he also wants to write an article about himself. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)}

Marcus Lush

Hi, I noticed that you deleted Marcus Lush back in Jan 2008. Can't find the discussion, was it a speedy delete? He's a notable New Zealand TV and Radio presenter, there is plenty of evidence of notability in reliable sources such as this interview with him in the Listener, this article about him in the Sunday Star-Times, this article about him in the Nelson Mail, and so on. Perhaps you could undelete the article and I'll add those sources to kick-start it if it's all stubby? Ryan Paddy (talk) 03:09, 18 June 2008 (UTC) Cheers, have started it. Ryan Paddy (talk) 05:07, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Michael B. Younan

Hello, I was notified that the article I created was immediately deleted from Wikipedia because of "Blatant Advertising". Futher review of the article would show you that it is nothing more than an aggregation of much of the available information about this candidate. The focus of the article is entirely on the candidate and his businesses and family background are included only to inform the public of the candidate's history. Every effort was made to present a balanced article and I believe it should not have been deleted. Is there any way to undo this delete? I mean no disrespect but I reviewed the article text and I very much disagree with your decision.

You can contact me at my talkpage; my username is concerned219hs.

Thanks!

Oh and by the way, I found this on the NPP guidelines page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NPP): "Tagging anything other than attack pages or complete nonsense a minute after creation is not constructive and only serves to annoy the page author." I think you would agree that the page I created is neither an attack nor complete nonsense.

--Concerned219hs (talk) 05:01, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mongoloid Porn Inferno

You deleted my page about this rare and unknown TV program from Belarus. Do you not think that Mongoloids deserve loving too? You fascist! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mongoloidporninferno (talk • contribs) 16:12, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to understand better how to reverse deletion of Jewpiter

I saw that you changed your mind from questioning the notability of Jewpiter to indicating that it was blatant advertising. I've read through the guidelines on spamming and would ask you to specify what needs to be changed in order for it to not fall under "blatant advertising".

I wanted to explain that 150,000 college kids go to Israel each year with Birthright and to demonstrate that aggressive follow-up is needed to enable the full results of such a trip. Every young Jew in America has heard of Birthright Israel. It's a well-known organization, hence having its own page on Wikipedia. Jewpiter doesn't need to recruit the kids through Wikipedia...they find out about it while they're on the trip to Israel. I merely wanted to present Jewpiter objectively as an organization. How can i make it more objective, because clearly you don't think it is as it stands.

Thanks

Claudine

--CABaker 16:42, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Hamdra page deletion

Hi, could you please explain why this page was deleted - as far as i am aware it is within the rules, and infact matchs pages such as vonage, vodafone, O2, comcast. There is no trace of adverting on the page (also there is nothing to advert on the main site www.hamdra.co.uk) and provides users with information about the company - as does any other company on wikipedia.

If you could reconsider your decision, or message me as to how i can change it so it meets your requirements.

Acxiom Digital page deletion

Why was the Acxiom Digital page deleted? It it a legitamate company that deserves it's own page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cdubbs94 (talk • contribs) 17:43, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Insite Security page deleted

Hello, you deleted my page: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Insite_Security&action=edit&redlink=1. Your comment claims the page is not notable, but I've inlcuded 7 references to independent news sources mentioning the company and its services. Insite is the only business offering the service it does in the way it offers them -- how is this not notable? Thanks. Amigdal (talk) 18:21, 18 June 2008 (UTC)--Amigdal (talk) 18:21, 18 June 2008 (UTC)Amigdal[reply]

CoR City of Refuge Deletion

Sorry to bother you but may i ask why the Article City of Refuge was deleted, I would like to remake it and am curious to why it was deleted so that i will not make the same mistake...

Thank you for your Time, ArchangelApostle —Preceding unsigned comment added by ArchangelApostle (talk • contribs) 20:26, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you For Clearing that up, ArchangelApostle (talk) 21:06, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus deletion?

Just out of curiosity, could you point me to the AfD on Larry Sinclair? I believe you are mistaken. It also can't be the same content, as I wrote it from scratch today from sources published today or yesterday, which predated the last deletion. -- Kendrick7^talk 03:53, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did get the impression that the previous versions were an unsourced BLP violating free for alls. Sorry for resorting to WP:IAR, but I don't think a handful of admins can decide we're not going to cover this election's media side shows (I mean, we have an article on Paula Jones, last I checked). I really don't want to take my chances with the hoi polloi at DRV without some sort of valid AfD first. And this from a guy who's put a fair amount of work into s:Author:Barack Obama. -- Kendrick7^talk 04:09, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Exmoor

Just to say I've changed the protection for a week. For some reason some mindless IPs are vandalising it at present so I've protected it for a week from IP edits (move protect still there). Feel free to change it if you want - cheers --Herby ^{talk thyme} 07:42, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Slidell High School

Is there a reason you blanked out a whole slew of text at Slidell High School?--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 13:59, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh OK. I probably think that should be trimmed not deleted. But that editor has definitely been making some questionable contributions in the last half hour, and that section is far from good, so I understand your rationale.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 14:06, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I can show you where there are other school pages with information on their ROTC units and theirs haven't been removed Armed Drill Commander (talk) 14:28, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is this information verifiable? If not, out it goes. -- Hoary (talk) 14:30, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bogalusa_High_School Armed Drill Commander (talk) 14:33, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Big Mountain

Thanks for the assistance in the Big Mountain/Whitefish Resort article. That Anon/IP has been a problem for a while now. I had hoped he had calmed down, but further posting by Donnie seems to have set him off. Alyeska (talk) 15:51, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Rhodes

Can please give me a goood reason why you keep deleting the page i make for The Rhodes? cause i spent a lot of time working on it, and if we have to prove to you why we think it should stay on, i think you should have to prove why you think its so important that it stays off. —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Rhodes (talk • contribs) 19:49, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, NawlinWiki. You deleted my article before I was even done with it. I was in the process of editing (which would have included sources and a reason why it was valid) but you didn't bother to wait for that. I have to say, it's a bit disappointing that you people don't even wait until someone is finished with a page prior to removing it. I've only been working on it for the past 5r minutes. Alawforlonny (talk) 23:33, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Insite Security article

Hi. Can you please advise me of the differences between this page about Control Risks Group (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_Risks_Group) and my page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insite_Security)? To me they look similar, with their page giving more details about how their company evolved, but no more relevant references or noteworthy narrative. They were the first group to offer a certain business solution (kidnap advice) and Insite was the first to offer a different solution (outsourced management of security issues). Can you suggest some changes to make the story of Insite and Insite's practices more acceptable for wikipedia? I am not trying to place an ad, but I do think the business and style of business at Insite is unique and relevant for exposure. Thanks.--Amigdal (talk) 15:08, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Insite Security follow up

Hi NawlinkWiki. Can you still advise me on how a company's story can be published on wikipedia? Should I reference some significant business or projects that Insite has done? Would referencing some of Insite's clients help? These steps can be difficult because of the confidential nature of security work. I am sorry you are considering the Control Risks Group page for deletion -- I think they are significant and information about them should remain available. Bigger corporations with a big impact have articles all over wikipedia, CRG and Insite are smaller businesses but still notable for their unique services. Does this make them less suited to be described in wikipedia articles? I have read the standards, but terms like "notable" "relevant" or "blatant advertising" are not helping me understand what facts must be present in an article to make it worthy of publication. Can you advise me how to structure the article, what type of facts to include, what type of references would make it acceptable? Thanks.--Amigdal (talk) 15:26, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Drake & Josh: Best Christmas Ever

I was wondering if you'd mind restoring the version of this article that you deleted into the history of the current article - as required by the GFDL license. I think the article's been improved so that's it's no longer an A1 candidate. Sorry for the trouble, regards Guest9999 (talk) 17:38, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick response. Guest9999 (talk) 17:40, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request Not To Delete My Page

i made a page about purple:avenue, i request for you not to delete this as 1, i am not finished typing it up and 2, the founder of purple:avenue is an inspiration to many young people wanting to start up in business especially their own.

So i ask of you to please leave it up for all to view.

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 01 info (talk • contribs) 11:44, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback on Page Deletion

Hello, recently I made a page for an online browser based game named Prison Struggle and cited a reliable source in that of an online gaming magazine yet it said i had not cited any. Is this one source not enough or just not good enough?

I'm sorry to bother you, I understand you'll get many of these questions but I'd like to know where the article went wrong for the future.

Thanks for your time and hope to hear back from you soon

Thanks for such a quick response on the issue, I will first look thoroughly at the requirements of the reliable sources and then re-edit the page if that is possible.

Thanks again

 —Preceding unsigned comment added by JordGraves (talk • contribs) 12:21, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Hot Office

You salted The Hot Office - it's back again as Hot Office. The author Rowland Alan Reeves (talk · contribs) is new, so may well be a sock of the author of "The Hot Office". Regards, JohnCD (talk) 12:27, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yes i am the same user, but i'm at work trying to upload an article on the hot office, and its hardly contreversial what i'm trying to say - and it keeps getting deleted.

could you please tell me what i'm doing wrong, because you've told me before that i can't sort of put quotes in, and i've taken them out etc etc.

help please! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rowland Alan Reeves (talk • contribs) 14:07, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Source-Code links deleted

You have deleted links to source-code that I've posted. These are legitimate links which are very popular, some of them receiving more than 50 downloads a day! Besides, I've put the links in the 'External Links' section where they belong. And why haven't you deleted links to others' source-code?!? Please stop deleting these links. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chipchap (talk • contribs) 12:52, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hot office

for christ sake, what am i doing wrong?

i'm working for the hot office, and i've been asked to upload a wikipedia article.

i really don't see a problem with stating that its a company that rents out office space which is based in the uk.

please tell me why that is so terrible, and how i can edit the article so it is acceptable for wikipedia!

regards,

Rowland Reeves —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rowland Alan Reeves (talk • contribs) 14:05, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please review my AfD closures

Hello. I've only recently begun closing AfDs (I might, I think, have done one or two shortly after I was enmopped, but heck, that was a long time ago) and I'm looking for some critical feedback. I thought you might be able to give me some pointers / flag up ways I can improve / point out I've made horrendous cock-ups that I can fix.

I'm aware that it took me some time to get the hang of where to place the top message and I still sometimes forget to remove the categorisation line. That's just me being daft and I think I've just about got it now. But... apart from that... anything I can sharpen up?

Cheers --Dweller (talk) 15:33, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blimey, that was quick. Thank you so much! If you wouldn't mind, I'd appreciate it if you cast an eye again in a week or so, as I'm stepping up to more complex consensus decisions. --Dweller (talk) 15:44, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My Page about Trayce Shaw

He is a real person, but he's an important person. He's famous and I think that he deserves to have a Wikipedia page. He needs to be known. I thought I could put him on here because Chris Crocker has a page on here. But Trayce's videos actually have a point... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ddrlover (talk • contribs) 17:44, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for reverting the vandalism to my talk page and also for all of your other contributions to Wikipedia. I frequently see your name on articles I watch and know those are edits I can trust. →Wordbuilder (talk) 19:10, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At my wit's end

NW, I am totally at my wit's end with User:Presumptive and his attempts to ride roughshod over the AfD process concerning an article he's apparently obsessed with. He has made a mockery of the ANI page (see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#How to respond to threat of blocking, how to get more time to receive info about an article? and this AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Joseph Didier (2nd nomination). He's even gone so far as to copy-and-paste comments supporting him from the original AfD, and also posted an online classified ad to get people in the town where this murder took place to jump in. I am completely and totally exhausted by his actions, and have decided to turn to you to see if something can be done about him, or if I'm just plain crazy. I might add that this guy seems particularly knowledgeable about Wikipedia policies (or not) for someone whose first known contribution was three weeks ago. If I didn't know better, I would suspect sockpuppetry, but I have no way of investigating that. Can you help before I jump off the proverbial ledge? - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 06:32, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Forvik

Hi, can you please allow Forvik to be edited? There has recently been plenty of new information on news articles and its website. It is still too early to label it as too short, it was just created today. Thanks ----- Onecanadasquarebishopsgate 13:05, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for protecting Forvik. We now have Crown Dependency of Forvik. I am not sure of the protocols here - should this be subject to a WP:Merge proposal? Ben MacDui ^Talk/Walk 08:04, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, as it is an article on a different subject, the only similarity being the location of the micronation, which is mentioned in several news articles and even has an official website. Onecanadasquarebishopsgate 16:50, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A Spring of Hope

The non-profit 501(c)(3) charity A Spring of Hope was deleted 3 times earlier today. It is a legitimate foundation. I listed a Miami Herald article that recognized the charity, but the page was even deleted before I was finished. This is a very notable foundation. The official website, www.aspringofhope.org offers all of the information. Why was the page deleted? I also lost all of the copy I put on the page; is there any way I can recover it? http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Spring_of_Hope

Brittyoung (talk) 16:46, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Protection request

Hi, you protected the redirect at Forvik, can you also protect Crown Dependency of Forvik as well please. --MacRusgail (talk) 16:33, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect is not needed as this new article is describing the micronation itself, and not the island in detail - that should be left as the purpose of the Forewick Holm article. Onecanadasquarebishopsgate 16:47, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not exactly sure why to be honest. Although it exists mostly in the head of Mr Hill, the Forewick Holm island article remains a stub, and this is possibly the one and only significant thing that has happened there. There aren't any brochs for example...--MacRusgail (talk) 18:09, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Detailed information on the micronation has no place in the Forewick Holm article, but rather in an article on the micronation itself. Whether anything else significant happened on the island or not is irrelevant when deciding if CD of Forvik should have its own article. Onecanadasquarebishopsgate 18:39, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On an old change...

I've been a wikipedian for a few years, and I was just now about to create my user page, and it said that you had already previously deleted it, even though I'd never made one. It was back in December, but do you, by chance, remember what happened? (Sawyer (talk) 02:50, 28 June 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Lyle123

Hello NW. I may already have told you this but I never remember these things... In any case, can you let me (or Dmcdevit) know when you block new socks of Lyle123 (a.k.a. StealBoy)? For a few months now, I've been tracking down his socks with the help of Dmcdevit (unfortunately M.I.A. right now) so I'd be grateful if you can pass along the info so that range blocks can be imposed. Thanks, Pascal.Tesson (talk) 16:09, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]