User talk:Codyofga

Speedy deletion of Obama bin laden

Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jfire (talk) 01:54, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you add defamatory content once again, as you did to Obama bin laden, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gromlakh (talk) 01:55, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Testing tree

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Gromlakh (talk) 02:09, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Visconti triplets

I have nominated Visconti triplets, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visconti triplets. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Steve Crossin (talk)(email) 17:15, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Visconti triplets

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Visconti triplets, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Woland (talk) 17:20, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Visconti triplets, you will be blocked from editing. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:21, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You admitted that "You know very well that something like that doesn't have a printable reference". If you can't support your article with references, it doesn't belong here. See WP:V. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:35, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- You can use Internet sources -- they just have to be reliable and verifiable, like any other sources. Again, please read WP:V. Also, you might want to look at WP:PORNBIO. And as far as I can tell, I wasn't being sarcastic. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:40, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- - Tell you what. Create the page in your userspace at User:Codyofga/Visconti triplets. Let me know when you think it's ready, and I'll take a look at it. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:46, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- - - Sorry, both sources are blogs. Those aren't considered reliable sources per WP:V (again, you really should read that). NawlinWiki (talk) 17:55, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, that's a reliable source. That gets you past problem #1, but not problem #2: The source states that the Viscontis are working on their debut film. That doesn't qualify them as notable per WP:PORNBIO:

Pornographic actors

   * Has won or been a serious nominee for a well-known award, such as those listed in Category:Adult movie awards or Category:Film awards or from a major pornographic magazine, such as Penthouse, Playboy, or Playgirl, as well as their counterparts in other pornography genres.
   * Has made unique contributions to a specific pornographic genre, such as beginning a trend in pornography, or starring in an iconic, groundbreaking or blockbuster feature.
   * Has been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media.

I would suggest you wait a little bit until they can meet these criteria (it looks like they may well meet the third one pretty soon). Thanks for your efforts, NawlinWiki (talk) 18:27, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- You asked "does it have to be multiple films why not just one?" Because there are a zillion porno actors who have been in one film. They don't all get Wikipedia articles. The above guideline is meant to separate the notable from the nonnotable actors. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:32, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- - Even if they're the "first gay triplets", if they never make a second film and/or are never recognized by anyone other than the single AVI article, they won't be notable. That's why we wait until there's multiple recognition. Not everyone who might become notable does in fact become notable. Be patient. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:40, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 17:39, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Visconti triplets

1) Take a deep breath and calm down. 2) Try to be civil 3) It looks like it was deleted for two reasons (a) lack of notability and (b) it was completely without reliable sources. You are thouroughly encouraged to create new articles, but most new articles are deleted for the two above reasons, aside from vandalsim. --Woland (talk) 17:58, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]