User talk:NatrualEdit1888

Welcome!

Hello, NatrualEdit1888, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 21:34, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Conway (IRA Member) has been accepted

William Conway (IRA Member), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Tazerdadog (talk) 13:46, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Sharon Keenan. I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 16:55, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Sharon Keenan

Hi, I'm Vexations. NatrualEdit1888, thanks for creating verify the information presented in the article doesn't. Can you clarify where you found the information for which you did not provide a source?]]!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. There are quite a large number of unverifiable claims in the article. The sources are often auction records that don't say very much. It looks as if you have access to information that someone like myself, who tries to [{WP:V

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Vexations (talk) 11:10, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sharon Keenan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sharon Keenan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharon Keenan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 02:18, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sharon Keenan

Hello, NatrualEdit1888. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sharon Keenan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sharon Keenan

Hello, NatrualEdit1888. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sharon Keenan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:28, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sharon Keenan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sharon Keenan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharon Keenan. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:43, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Draft:Sharon Keenan, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. UtherSRG (talk) 13:28, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sharon Keenan (December 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please make it evident in the draft that she meets either WP:ARTIST or more generally WP:PERSON. Incidentally, a lot of the references appear to be "by Sharon Keenan web", which seems meaningless. For each web reference, provide the title of the particular web page (not merely a description of it), and also the title of the website that hosts it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sharon Keenan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 23:48, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NatrualEdit1888! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hoary (talk) 23:48, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sharon Keenan has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sharon Keenan. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 23:51, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hoary, I'm fairly new to this article writing so I will explain as best I can on your points. The first one on whether Sharon Keenan is a person of note, she is not "famous" in the sense of a lot of artists as we know most are never recognised in their own time like a lot of other creators...but, Sharon Keenan does have quite a few works on public display in England, and in Gibraltar; both of which have been cited from other independent sources such as the Gibraltar Government website for Admiral Rooke for example, and plaque in the City of London (cited) by another user. So, for this reason she is a person of note.

The references to "by Sharon Keenan web" (I cleared these up) was a title name reference and is not her website which she does not have one, they are all independent links sources which you can see if you follow them on the link.

Going back to person of note. She is a notable artist from the 20th century with many works of art pictures and sculptures, and even a range of ships head figurines that she created for Royal Doulton (cited), and she is woman artist which, you may or may agree, women are still not represented enough in the art world and probably Wikipedia. So that is the reasoning behind the article. Thanks. NatrualEdit1888 (talk) 22:44, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Notable", from the wiki perspective, is another thing entirely than what you seem to think it is. Please check out WP:NARTIST for what is needed to show notability for an artist to have an article in this encyclopedia. - UtherSRG (talk) 02:16, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that under the WP:NARTITST that if the (Creator) person has:

The person's work (or works) has: (a) become a significant monument, (b) been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) won significant critical attention, or (d) been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.

In the article I expressly refer the statue "Admiral George Rooke" which was commissioned by the Government of Gibraltar and is also mentioned on the page of his Wiki Biography. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Rooke#/media/File:Rooke_1704.jpg NatrualEdit1888 (talk) 18:05, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another reference to a work in public is this one - https://artuk.org/discover/artists/keenan-sharon-19482017 NatrualEdit1888 (talk) 18:06, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sharon Keenan was the first to create a range of ships figureheads for Royal Doulton - http://www.doultonfigures.com/Doulton-HN-Numbers-List.pdf NatrualEdit1888 (talk) 18:11, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sharon Keenan (December 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

not clear how they pass WP:NARTIST and sources are largely not independent.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sharon Keenan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:30, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

The sources for the references are the Government of Gibraltar website, another mentioning her in an article and the wikipage of Admiral Rooke. I was using Wikipedia's advice on "People notable for only one event" which was the public statue of Admiral Rooke. I think it's a notable achievement. NatrualEdit1888 (talk) 15:59, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking at the article as an event....https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people)

"The general rule is to cover the event, not the person."

with reference to the statue which I know the people and Government of Gibraltar are proud of. It was commissioned for the 300 year anniversary. NatrualEdit1888 (talk) 16:03, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sharon Keenan (January 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sharon Keenan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:02, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Hello. I was just reading through the William Conway (Irish republican) article and I note that a significant volume of the content (including about the subject being involved with the GAA, formed a hurling club, died in 1976, received a 21 gun salute at his funeral, etc) is not supported by the linked references. Where does this content "come from"? Please note that editors adding content are expected to support their additions and that unsourced material can be removed at any time. Guliolopez (talk) 13:54, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Guilopez, I have just seen this.

I am going to try source more information when I can is that ok? NatrualEdit1888 (talk) 14:26, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do, that would be great. NatrualEdit1888 (talk) 18:01, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sharon Keenan

Hello, NatrualEdit1888. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sharon Keenan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:20, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Your edit to Draft:Sir Samuel Lee Anderson has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 14:19, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sir Samuel Lee Anderson (October 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sir Samuel Lee Anderson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 16:20, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samuel Lee Anderson (October 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Samuel Lee Anderson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 00:07, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NatrualEdit1888 (talk) 21:53, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough valid cited references.

I added cited references from various published works on Google Books to back up published work.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samuel Lee Anderson has been accepted

Samuel Lee Anderson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 05:49, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]