User talk:N Jeevan

N Jeevan, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi N Jeevan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like TheAafi (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

hi

hi


EGL¹²³⁴ 09:02, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Who is this? N Jeevan (talk) 09:12, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

OH NO SOMEONE HACKED INTO User:EGL1234's account!!!!! QUICK BLOCK HIM!!!!! It's a joke please don't block me :) Sungodtemple a tcg fan!!1!11!! (talk) 12:23, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

No personal attacks

Hello, I'm Ahunt. I noticed that you made a comment on the page HAL Tejas that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Ahunt (talk) 18:03, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Request

Bro please watch this page Arjun (tank) -Echo1Charlie (talk) 14:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

@Echo1Charlie: yes I saw it. Is that the problem with Yamato Bismarck Hood Iowa. N Jeevan (talk) 18:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Yes, He's a bangladeshi editor, removing cited content with opinionated irrational reasons- Echo1Charlie (talk) 18:36, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

@Echo1Charlie: Yes I also saw his recent contribution. I think he has been engaged in an edit war. If he continues this still more we shall complain this to admim. But before that he should be given warning about the Wikipedia policies and guidelines. N Jeevan (talk) 18:41, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

User:Echo1Charlie, User:N Jeevan Did I delete anything without explanation? Is there no logic in my words? I am not involved in any edit war against you. My explanations, (1) Arjun MBT article: (1.1)The FMBT related information is based on an old reference but no further updates available from official sources. (1.2) T-90 is the first choice of the Indian Army. Arjun MBT has already earned a reputation as one of the worst MBTs ever made. Business Standard India mentioned "the results are still officially secret". Then how those media provided such detailed information? (2)Indian 6th generation fighter: (2.1) Neither any 6th generation fighter program announced by India yet nor name of any future 6th generation fighter anounced as "HAL AMCA MK2/Mark2". The reality is Indian 5th generation HAL AMCA is still in prototype development process as of 2021.  (3) Conclusion: The main problem of Indian editors is that you compare Indian planned projects (mostly unofficial or obsolete) with the real running projects of other countries. Labelling "HAL AMCA MK2" as a 6th generation fighter project is an example of this. In my personal opinion, India will not be able to replace all Russian-made tanks with its indigenous tanks. I doubt whether any new Indian indigenous tank after Arjun MK1A will enter the Indian Army in the near future. I have more doubts whether HAL will be able to build a mature fifth generation fighter in the right time as per the plan. You two have to be patient until the details of any Indian military project is revealed by the Indian officials. I request you to use latest official data only. You will be responsible if rumors are spread through Wikipedia. Amature YouTubers and Facebook generals used the information you added here to create YouTube videos and Facebook posts to fool those who don't know much about the military technology. I hope you now understand my motive.Yamato Bismarck Hood Iowa (talk) 20:43, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

@Yamato Bismarck Hood Iowa: Yes you have given explanations and reasons about your edits, but it is not proper.

1. Firstly I didn't ask your opinion whether HAL can make mature  fifth generation fighters or India will not be able to replace all Russian-made tanks with its indigenous tanks, edits should not be made on your personal opinions in Wikipedia. Yes I agree that HAL AMCA is a fifth generation fighter but it will be also having 6th gen technologies to stay relevant to coming decades and this is being confirmed by IAF Chief. We always use only confirmed sources but not rumours. You tell that Amature YouTubers and Facebook generals used the information that I added here to create YouTube videos and Facebook posts to fool those who don't know much about the military technology. How can you tell this. Do you have any proof that the YouTube videos and FB posts are been done because of my edits?
2. Secondly the sources used in the FMBT section are confirmed as there is a need for new tanks to replace t-72, DRDO has confirmed to develop new tank based on Indian Army's requirements. There is no rule in Wikipedia that only new sources should be used. Note that edits should not be made based on your personal opinions. I think you understand, thank you.

- N Jeevan (talk) 07:21, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

@Yamato Bismarck Hood Iowa: Greetings

1. FMBT: FMBT related information is constructed using old to new references (from 2010 to 2021), it's essential to convey how it was started and how it was progressed, Can you imagine bangladesh (country) article without the history how it was formed?!
2. "Arjun MBT has already earned a reputation as one of the worst MBTs ever made" - according to who? redddit community? red effect? it's not you, me or them decides whether it's good or bad, there's a written rule on Wikipedia that edit should be made with citation and no space for original research which apparently means your opinion has no value on wikipedia articles, the same logic applies to the 6th generation fighter.
3. The part about Indian Editors would be considered as personal attack and shaming a respected community, which would be reported
4. "In my personal opinion, India will..." - That's the first rule your personal opinion has no value on Wikipedia articles!
5. "I have more doubts.." - you can, but don't take that to Wikipedia

- Echo1Charlie (talk) 05:49, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

User:Echo1Charlie Bangladesh has become independent after 9 months of bloody war. India helped us in its own interest. In any case, we are grateful for what India did in 1971. But what india is doing now is nothing but hostility. However this is not related to this topic. I am not against any India related Wikipedia articles. I am against creating propaganda in Wikipedia. I did not add any personal opinions to Wikipedia articles too. Good luck. Yamato Bismarck Hood Iowa (talk) 06:40, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

@Yamato Bismarck Hood Iowa: "I am against creating propaganda in Wikipedia" - yeah me too, Type 59 Durjoy - this article perfectly fit for that, I'm currently exploring options, will let you know. -Echo1Charlie (talk) 06:48, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

User:Echo1Charlie I have no problem with this. Those are old junk tanks. Yamato Bismarck Hood Iowa (talk) 06:55, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

@Yamato Bismarck Hood Iowa: you're mistaken, I've no disrespect to this or any Bangladeshi wikipedia articles, but mentioned it as it fit this context and your comment which I've highlighted -Echo1Charlie (talk) 06:59, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Project 18-class destroyer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Project 18-class destroyer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project 18-class destroyer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Drachentöter001 (talk) 13:56, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

The WikiEagle - January 2022

The WikiEagle

The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter

Volume I — Issue 1
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Announcements After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name The WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its sub-projects. If you wish to continue receiving The WikiEagle, you can add your username to the mailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please let us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged. On 16 December, an RfC was closed which determined theaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which is cited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue. Luft46.com has been added to the list of problematic sources after this discussion. The Jim Lovell article was promoted to Featured Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Hawkeye7. The Raymond Hesselyn article was promoted to Good Article status on 4 December after being nominated by Zawed. The Supermarine Sea King article was promoted to Good Article status on 22 December after being nominated by Amitchell125. The William Hodgson (RAF officer) article was promoted to Good Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Zawed.
Members New Members KingAviationKid (Joined on 17 December) PatrickChiao (Joined on 22 December) Wp9097 (Joined on 16 December) Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921. Closed Discussions Featured Article assessment Jim Lovell (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 26 December 2021 Good Article assessment HAL Tejas (discussion) – Closed as not promoted on 30 December 2021 William Hodgson (RAF officer) (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 26 December 2021 Supermarine Sea King (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 22 December 2021 Raymond Hesselyn (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 4 December 2021 Deletion Timeline of Berlin Brandenburg Airport's construction (discussion) – Closed as delete and redirect on 30 December 2021 Evergreen International Airlines Flight 17 (discussion) – Closed as keep on 25 December 2021 Requested moves Akbarpur (Ambedkar Nagar) Airstrip → Akbarpur Airstrip (discussion) – Closed as moved on 30 December 2021 1983 Avensa Douglas DC-9 crash → Avensa Flight 007 (discussion) – Closed as moved on 30 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 035 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 035 (discussion) – Withdrawn on 28 December 2021	Article Statistics This data reflects values from DMY. Aviation pages by quality Quality Total FA 142 FL 15 A 56 GA 505 B 4,573 C 11,878 Start 15,082 Stub 18,754 List 2,539 Category 11,638 Disambig 653 File 2,713 Portal 629 Project 89 Redirect 1,518 Template 2,489 NA 66 Assessed 73,339 Unassessed 1 Total 73,340 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 251,807 Ω = 4.92
New/Ongoing Discussions Featured Article review D. B. Cooper (discussion) – Since 14 December 2021 A-class Article assessment Granville Gee Bee Model A (discussion) – Since 21 April 2020 List of aviation shootdowns and accidents during the Iraq War (discussion) – Since 22 February 2010 Good Article assessment Romanian Air Corps (discussion) – Since 25 December 2021 Jean Batten (discussion) – Since 2 October 2021 Merger proposals List of astronauts by name → List of astronauts by year of selection (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 List of cosmonauts → List of space travelers by nationality (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 List of space travelers by name → List of space travelers by nationality (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 Holidays Czech Airlines → Czech Airlines (discussion) – Since 23 June 2021 Bendix Aviation → Bendix Corporation (discussion) – Since 30 May 2021 Airport Movement Area Safety System → Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (discussion) – Since 29 May 2021 ASDE-X → Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (discussion) – Since 28 May 2021 Splitting proposals Family Airlines (discussion) – Since 23 November 2021 2021 Kabul airport attack (discussion) – Since 24 September 2021 List of military aircraft of the United States (discussion) – Since 16 August 2021 Braniff International Airways (discussion) – Since 8 September 2019 Deletion List of maiden voyages (discussion) – Since 29 December 2021 Requested moves Hot-air balloon → Hot air balloon (discussion) – Since 30 December 2021 Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela Flight 108 → Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela Flight 109 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 150 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 150 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 206 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 206 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 708 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 708 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 892 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 892 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 TWA Flight 800 → TWA Flight 800 (1996) (discussion) – Since 27 December 2021 Dynamic Airways Flight 405 → Dynamic International Airways Flight 405 (discussion) – Since 26 December 2021 CommutAir Flight 4281 → CommutAir Flight 4821 (discussion) – Since 25 December 2021 Thai Airways → Thai Airways International (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 Thai Airways fleet → Thai Airways International fleet (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 List of Thai Airways destinations → List of Thai Airways International destinations (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 Did you know Ravish Malhotra (discussion) – Since 30 December 2021 Alexander Tahy (discussion) – Since 26 December 2021 Veronica Volkersz (discussion) – Since 6 December 2021 Rudolf Szepessy-Sokoll (discussion) – Since 3 December 2021 On The Main Page Did you know... ... that the aerobatic demonstration aircraft used by SoloTürk is also used in military operations of the Turkish Air Force? (24 December)
Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list. Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)