User talk:Mosesbrazas

Welcome!

Hi Mosesbrazas! I noticed your contributions to 2021 New York City Council election and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! JesseRafe (talk) 17:09, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in 2021 New York City Council election. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. JesseRafe (talk) 13:22, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add political endorsements that do not meet criteria for inclusion, as you have done twice in 2021 New York City mayoral election. The criteria can be found here: WP:ENDORSE. Thank you. Shoestringnomad (talk) 20:17, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Luke Macfarlane have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Luke Macfarlane was changed by Mosesbrazas (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.85232 on 2021-05-22T03:23:01+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:23, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at 2021 New York City Council election, you may be blocked from editing. You've been asked several times to stop providing sources like this. Please look at the policy at WP:ENDORSE. JesseRafe (talk) 19:06, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at 2021 New York City mayoral election, you may be blocked from editing. There's no reason to replace a reputable source with a less (or un-) reputable source. You also shouldn't change information that is inconsistent with cited sources, especially without adding a new source to support your controversial change. Shoestringnomad (talk) 17:48, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 2021 New York City mayoral election.
Read WP:ENDORSE. It's one of the shortest and most direct policies there are here. It's not fair for others to have to monitor your edits to make sure these pages are accurate. And it would also be too bad if you were to be blocked because I think you're trying in good faith, but the onus is on you to learn (and to communicate). If you don't read these warnings then maybe the block will get your attention, you've had more than enough chances, but you're not making much progress on improving. JesseRafe (talk) 17:48, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 2021 New York City mayoral election. You have got to be kidding me. It's been a week, but you will get no more warnings, just reported. It's not worth others' efforts to have to keep fixing your errors. JesseRafe (talk) 13:38, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adding edit summaries

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Shoestringnomad (talk) 17:59, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sherri Shepherd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The View. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adrienne Adams (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Corey Johnson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of In a Child's Name

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on In a Child's Name requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. LJF2019 ^talk 07:33, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve In a Child's Name

Hello, Mosesbrazas,

Thank you for creating In a Child's Name.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Additional references are needed to meet WP:NFILM. Kindly do the needful.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 02:44, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Connecticut, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gloria and Creator.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ron Duguay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Second Avenue.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lynn Schulman moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lynn Schulman, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:38, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just to explain, the main reason why I have moved this article to the draft space is that the subject's notability has not been established, and the article would have been a candidate for deletion; I'm giving you instead the opportunity to improve on it, before submitting for review. Please note that per WP:POLITICIAN, city-level politicians are not inherently notable, and notability must be established via the WP:GNG route, which requires significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources. Of the sources cited, none meets these criteria.

Furthermore, some of the content is unsupported by referencing. In any article, but especially so in articles on living people, every material statement must be supported by a citation to a reliable source. Content that cannot be thus supported must be removed.

The draft also requires copy editing before it is ready for publication: for example, there are peacock terms/phrases and other promotional text which needs to be toned down; also, people should never be referred to by their first name only.

Thank you, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:47, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2022 New York State Senate election, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. BlueboyLINY (talk) 07:51, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Daily Mail

Hi, I just wanted to give you a heads-up about the Daily Mail ([1], [2]). It's a deprecated source, and should not be used in articles. You can see WP:RSP for more information on it and other sources to avoid - WP:DAILYMAIL is a link to go straight to the section on the Mail specifically. Egsan Bacon (talk) 01:15, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lynn Schulman 2 (March 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not meet WP:NPOLITICIAN.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lynn Schulman 2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lynn Schulman 2, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 17:56, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mosesbrazas! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 17:56, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at National Labor Federation. As you are well aware, the words "The hatred for capitalism and the indirect love of either slavery or communism" do not appear in the source to which you ascribed them, and appear to have been invented by you. Such deliberate falsification is unacceptable in Wikipedia, and if you repeat such behaviour your editing rights are likely to be restricted or totally removed. RolandR (talk) 07:10, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Luis Olmedo

The article Luis Olmedo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be a clear-cut WP:SINGLEEVENT case. I have found no sources discussing his career outside the extortion incident.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Modussiccandi (talk) 11:03, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lynn Schulman 2

Hello, Mosesbrazas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lynn Schulman 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 United States House of Representatives elections in New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Holden.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The nature of the lead section and citation guidance

Thank you for taking the time to edit and help make the Wikipedia better. Regarding your 6 December edits to the David Rivera article, the lead section is meant to summarize an article, and therefore Wikipedia guidelines suggest that quotations and citations are not usually appropriate there, although not prohibited. They belong in the text below the lead section. Also, bare url citations are more subject to link rot and are disfavored. See, for example, Wikipedia:Citing sources. Again, thanks for your contribution. --Bejnar (talk) 22:58, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Luis Olmedo

I've expanded the Luis Olmedo article. --Bejnar (talk) 01:32, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thanks. Mosesbrazas (talk) 01:39, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bringing Down the House (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steve Harris.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

An article you recently created, Daniel Torres, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, first place {{AfC submission|T}} atop the article, publish, then click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Silikonz💬 17:40, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Torres (American Politician)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Daniel Torres (American Politician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:43, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Daniel Torres (American Politician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Torres (American Politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Torres (American Politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bearcat (talk) 11:57, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Curnal Achilles Aulisio moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Curnal Achilles Aulisio. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Uncle Spock (talk) 03:19, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Curnal Achilles Aulisio (April 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

no sources?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Curnal Achilles Aulisio and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:20, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michelle Fine, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages African and Administration.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andy King (American politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Expulsion.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:25, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Jorge Muñoz (Colombian politician). Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Schazjmd (talk) 19:40, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Rafael Espinal, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. I warned you about this previously. Do not add unsourced content in front of a ref to make it appear as it is sourced, when that ref does not support the new text. Schazjmd (talk) 23:28, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Andrew Cuomo. Do not cite NYPost. Schazjmd (talk) 19:18, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Text placement

In this edit, you inserted unsourced text before the citation that supports the preceding text. Please don't do this ever, unless the existing citation also supports the new text that you're adding. I've moved the sentences you added to after the ref and tagged it as unsourced. Schazjmd (talk) 21:06, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cite your sources

When you add new information to articles, please include a reference to your source for the content. I have fixed your edit to Gale Brewer for you. Schazjmd (talk) 17:16, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:NYPOST. Don't use it as a source for content in articles. Schazjmd (talk) 23:25, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Asian Americans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fortune.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:37, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Mosesbrazas! Your additions to ConocoPhillips have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:59, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note - To be absolutely clear, providing the source of copyrighted content as a reference is not okay. Do not add copyrighted content. Write it in your own words. -- Whpq (talk) 19:38, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Schazjmd (talk) 19:39, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 for persistent addition of unsourced and poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Hammersoft (talk) 23:33, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been editing here for over two years. In that time you have received many warnings about this. You have failed to modify your behavior. Further, you have failed to communicate with anyone regarding your edits and why you think they're inline with our policies and guidelines. This lack of communication combined with the most recent final warning, and then just 10 minutes later you go and do it again leaves no choice but to block you. If you're not willing to work within our policies and guidelines, you will not be part of this community. This is a 24 hour block. I strongly suggest you take these warnings onboard and begin properly sourcing information you add to the project's article space. If you have questions, ask. I'll be happy to answer. If instead after the block expires you continue to act as you did before, the next block will be for considerably longer. It's your choice. I hope you choose well. --Hammersoft (talk) 23:33, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How do I write my signature? Mosesbrazas (talk) 19:08, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

At the end of your message, type 4 tildes like this: ~~~~. The software will automatically insert your signature and date/timestamp of your comment. Schazjmd (talk) 19:26, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

When you remove content, please explain why you are removing it in the edit summary. In your edit to Michelle Fine, you removed a large paragraph that contained a source. When I checked the source, I didn't find any mention of Fine, so it's reasonable to remove the unsourced claims, but other editors seeing your removal have no idea why you blanked it. If you had said "source doesn't mention Fine", other editors would know that you had a good reason for removing it. Without the edit summary to communicate to other editors, it looks like vandalism. I don't know what your reservations are about communicating with other editors at Wikipedia, but it's not a sustainable practice. Schazjmd (talk) 18:25, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I confused Michelle Fine with another Michelle. Mosesbrazas (talk) 19:07, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Curnal Achilles Aulisio (June 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TheChunky were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Curnal Achilles Aulisio and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 03:24, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
60	Bill Perkins (politician) (talk)	Add sources
497	Meatball (talk)	Add sources
128	2005 New York City mayoral election (talk)	Add sources
10	CUNY Graduate School of Public Health & Health Policy (talk)	Add sources
71	Coca-Cola Consolidated (talk)	Add sources
6	Julia Harrison (talk)	Add sources
72	Brett Giroir (talk)	Cleanup
92	Calhoun School (talk)	Cleanup
58	New York State Democratic Committee (talk)	Cleanup
16	East Asian typography (talk)	Expand
143	Daniel J. O'Donnell (talk)	Expand
1,544	Citigroup (talk)	Expand
30	Coastal Corporation (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
19	City and Country School (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
383	Hill Valley (Back to the Future) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
85,164	Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (talk)	Merge
100	Zackary Drucker (talk)	Merge
136	Devendrakula Velalar (talk)	Merge
25	Reform Party of New York State (talk)	Wikify
19	Howard J. Samuels (talk)	Wikify
16	LGBT student movement (talk)	Wikify
150	Brooklyn–Queens Day (talk)	Orphan
5	Christina Hayworth (talk)	Orphan
9	Tamara Ching (talk)	Orphan
46	James F. Gennaro (talk)	Stub
4	Winfield A. Huppuch (talk)	Stub
8	Sandra Frankel (talk)	Stub
20	Pat Foye (talk)	Stub
5	Bernard W. Harleston (talk)	Stub
12	Che Gossett (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:42, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Daniel Torres (New York State politician)

Hello, Mosesbrazas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daniel Torres (New York State politician), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Daniel Torres (New York State politician)

Hello, Mosesbrazas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Daniel Torres".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:51, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Curnal Achilles Aulisio

Hello, Mosesbrazas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Curnal Achilles Aulisio, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:05, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ira Magaziner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jonathan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Mosesbrazas/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:56, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mosesbrazas. Thank you for your work on Robert Rygor. Moriwen, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I'm very confused by this article's use of "cisgender". Rygor appears to have been a gay rights activist, not a "cisgender rights activist" (not a real thing, as far as I know). And what's up with "first openly cisgender gay man"? It doesn't really make sense to describe people as "openly cisgender".

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Moriwen}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— Moriwen (talk) 01:54, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am openly cisgender. Mosesbrazas (talk) 06:37, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert Rygor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Causes.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jesse Hamilton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adam Clayton Powell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]