Jump to content

User talk:Moonbread

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Moonbread, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Moonbread! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Thompson (July 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Bkissin (talk) 15:52, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Thompson (writer) has been accepted

[edit]
Thomas Thompson (writer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Duke of NonsenseWhat is necessary for thee?. 13:17, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:11, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:15, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Thomas Thompson with L. S. Lowry.gif

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thomas Thompson with L. S. Lowry.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 15:48, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nightenbelle was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nightenbelle (talk) 18:01, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:John Davies (poet, born 1944) has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John Davies (poet, born 1944). Thanks! FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 13:56, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Tamingimpala were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Tame (talk) 09:20, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clearfrienda was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Clearfrienda 💬 11:07, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think the best thing to do is to make a list of all the secondary sources that discuss your poet and his work--newspaper articles, journal articles, books, book reviews, etc. Then write/rewrite the content based only on the sources you have. I'll be glad to help, but it has to start with sources. If you want to put a bibliography on the talk page of the draft, that could be helpful. Drmies (talk) 19:06, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

John Davies poet 1944

[edit]

Bibliography

Ballin, M. (2013) Welsh Periodicals in English 1882-2012, Cardiff: University of Wales Press

Burton, R. (2012 ) The Richard Burton Diaries, London: Yale University Press (ed. C. Williams).

Hooker, J. (1987) The Presence of the Past: Essays on Modern British and American Poetry, Bridgend: Poetry Wales Press

James, B. Ll. (1993) The Ancestry of Edward Thomas in the National Library of Wales Journal, vol 28, no 1 pp81-93

John, A.V. (2015) The Actors' Crucible: Port Talbot and the Making of Burton, Hopkins, Sheen and all the Others, Cardigan: Parthian

Jones, S. R. (2009) The Literary Tradition of the Neath and Afan Valleys and Tir Iarll (Maesteg and Porthcawl), (M.Phil), University of Swansea

Rees, L. (2013) The Real Port Talbot, Bridgend: Seren

Shaffer, E. S. (1998) Comparative Criticism: Literary Devolution: Writing in Scotland, Ireland, Wales and England, vol 19, London: Cambridge University Press

Smith, C. J. P. (May 2003) Pebbles and Poems in Acumen Literary Journal, no.46, Brixham: Acumen Publications

Stephens, M. ed. (1986) The Oxford Companion to the Literature of Wales, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stephens, M. ed. (2007) Poetry 1900-2000, Cardigan: Parthian Books

Moonbread (talk) 14:48, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Davies (poet, born 1944) has been accepted

[edit]
John Davies (poet, born 1944), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

bonadea contributions talk 10:35, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kitson Williams poet

[edit]

Hello, Moonbread. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kitson Williams poet".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Equivamp - talk 09:53, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Kitson Williams poet, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 23:11, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]