User talk:The Authentic Egyptian Pasha

Al-Qaed Ibrahim Mosque moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Al-Qaed Ibrahim Mosque. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and appears to be a work in progress that is not yet ready for the main space. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Annh07 (talk) 12:14, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

alr thank you i'll work on it more!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Al-Qaed Ibrahim Mosque has been accepted

Al-Qaed Ibrahim Mosque, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 22:27, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you, I will always keep striving to help improve wikiepedia! Emperor Mo I (talk) 15:26, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cerebellum, sorry, but I don't think that was a correct decision. Drmies (talk) 14:55, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cerebellum, may I ask if you think that the page should be a draft again? It had been moved to a draft but I think it qualifies as a page. Moe the Alexandrian (talk) 19:04, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok I understood the problem Cerebellum thank you Moe the Alexandrian (talk) 19:19, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spiro Spathis (January 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jeraxmoira was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Spiro Spathis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 20:26, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Moe the Alexandrian! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 20:26, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spiro Spathis (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This could (should) be notable, but the current sources aren't quite enough to establish that per WP:GNG. Also, some of the content is unreferenced – where is all this information coming from?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Spiro Spathis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:35, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Spiro Spathis has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Spiro Spathis. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 14:47, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Your edit to Draft:Al-Qaed Ibrahim Mosque has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Drmies (talk) 14:54, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

bro it's a mosque what copyright? What's wrong with the article it had been accepted why has it been demoted I'm so confused rn? Is the pic copyrighted? It's used in the arabic wiki page https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%85%D8%B3%D8%AC%D8%AF_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%A6%D8%AF_%D8%A5%D8%A8%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%87%D9%8A%D9%85 I used the exact same image... all i did was translate the arabic wikipedia page to english, so I think it should qualify. Could you please explain more? Moe the Alexandrian (talk) 19:03, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok I got the problem thanks Drmies Moe the Alexandrian (talk) 19:19, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really sorry Drmies, I understood what you were saying, I guess I was just a bit mad. That's all, thank you for making me want to improve the article because this is not the best that it can be. Moe the Alexandrian (talk) 19:32, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Al-Qaed Ibrahim Mosque has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Al-Qaed Ibrahim Mosque. Thanks! Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 19:52, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you! Moe the Alexandrian (talk) 19:55, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Al-Qaed Ibrahim Mosque has been accepted

Al-Qaed Ibrahim Mosque, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:07, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spiro Spathis (February 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Appears to be a notable topic but many of the presented sources are WP:PRIMARY. I suggest you to remove those info from the draft that can not be verified through WP:RS. Getting rid of the company's website as references will improve this draft a lot.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Spiro Spathis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 09:51, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mosque of Ibrahim Terbana has been accepted

Mosque of Ibrahim Terbana, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 21:45, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sidi Bishr Mosque has been accepted

Sidi Bishr Mosque, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– Isochrone (talk) 12:33, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Moe the Alexandrian! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! – Isochrone (talk) 12:53, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot Isochrone! I also want to thank YOU for your amazing contributions. I'll make sure to benefit from the link you sent me. I definitely enjoy editing in Wikipedia. Apart from getting to write pages about many sites and people (I'm currently writing a page about a Greco-Roman theatre, the only one of it's kind in Egypt) in my hometown and my country, I love generally improving the website, it gives me pride that I'm part of an effort to create a new Library for Alexandria. Thanks once again for your warm message. Oh and thank you for the cookies! Moe the Alexandrian (talk) 13:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Feel free to ask me any questions if you have any, though it seems you’re getting along quite well. – Isochrone (talk) 22:35, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So you get...

Plip!

the trout! We done for your contributions and don't worry about making the occasional error. The whole point of Wikipedia is that with so many active editors it tends to be self-correcting. Good luck. Mike Turnbull (talk) 11:20, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

^w^ silly mistake really. I'll find out about the proper AD dates and I will add them to the page soon. For now I edited the page to display only the AH dates. Moe the Alexandrian (talk) 11:41, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spiro Spathis (July 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HighKing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is about a product therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. From what I can see, none of the sources meet ORGIND as they rely almost entirely on information provided by sources affiliated with the company.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Spiro Spathis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HighKing⁺⁺ 13:26, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HighKing I've talked to an wikipedia editor and they do quite agree that this is an unfounded rejection, as we simply don't believe that the sources used are not independent or that they are using sources affiliated with the company. It would be helpful from your part to specify those you believe are not independent, as I'm sure there's no way that none, yes NONE as you said, meet ORGIND. Peace be with you, and I hope you clarify more, as I am not seeking an argument, I just want more feedback that is not generalisation. The Authentic Egyptian Pasha (talk) 16:56, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I posted a detailed explanation already of the GNG/WP:NCORP guidelines and the specific sections which the references fail. The best way for you to learn our guidelines is for you to pick one of the references and identify the content within that reference that contains in-depth "Independent Content". If you can do so, link to the reference here, pointing to the paragraphs that you believe meet the guidelines and giving reasons why, and we will discuss. HighKing⁺⁺ 10:57, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spiro Spathis (July 7)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by HighKing was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: After the 4th rejection, and especially if the editor doesn't engage with feedback, topic just isn't notable. Insufficient GNG/WP:NCORP sourcing.

HighKing⁺⁺ 16:59, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spiro Spathis moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Spiro Spathis. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page and do not move it without review from another editor. Star Mississippi 18:53, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Spiro Spathis has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Spiro Spathis. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:08, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spiro Spathis has been accepted

Spiro Spathis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

A09|(talk) 10:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]