This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Misza13, is it possible to get User talk:Rememberkigali restored?[1] That particular user was one appearance of a formerly anonymous editor who pops up from time to time to harass me, (see his contribution list) and I would like to have the talk page history available if necessary to show previous warnings and dispute resolution.
This had previously come up on the Administrator's noticeboard - my understanding from that discussion was that we agreed to blank the talk page but leave it so that the history was still available. Should I have tagged the page as something to keep it live?
The main reason why the page was deleted is that it lingered in the CAT:TEMP category for too long. Every now and then, some admins may delete pages fro mthat category, unless they are tagged with some other specific tags, like sockpuppets. If it is an incarnation of another user, you may use one of the Sockpuppet templates. Alternatively, substitute the indef template and remove the category by hand (although this doesn't guarantee that someone won't delete pages via backlinks of the octagon image). Cheers, Миша1322:34, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, done. (RK is not quite a sockpuppet - he had previously edited from an IP, and he never created another name, so he doesn't quite qualify). TheronJ00:26, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Userboxes
Say I want to makes my own userboxes, such as:
This user is a resident of the third planet from Sol (the blue one).
, so how would I allow other people to use a simple string like that instead of a large array of formatting lines? Like I could make that userbox I made go to {{userbox|user:SuperLuigi31/templates/earth}} or something, right? How would I do that? --SuperLuigi3120:58, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If I understand you correctly now, what you want to do is edit User:SuperLuigi31/Userboxes/User earth and put the code {{subst:userbox|black|blue|[[Image:Solar_sys2.jpg|50px]]|This user is a resident of the third planet from Sol (the blue one).}} there (it will get expanded to the full wikicode). Then, to actually put the userbox on a userpage, use the code {{User:SuperLuigi31/Userboxes/User earth}}. Миша1322:05, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Lol after all of this, you had might as well adopt my WP account! Anyway, I have just a few more questions. I did the Wikipediholic test and came to wonder: what are bots, how do they work, and how would I go about making one? I am by no means planning on jumping up and making a bot (I'm still rather new, dispite my general proficiency at WP.), however I feel that that would be a good thing to learn about. Thanks!
What for you have blocked me in Wikipedia
I there am registered - Gavrilov Sergey (Гаврилов Сергей)
I live in Russia. Has written in discussion some amendments on a theme football.
I was more than anything bad did not write.
You of me are exact with whom that have mixed, or who that has written that that bad from my name.
I to anybody bad did not make anything
Gavrilov Sergey (Гаврилов Сергей)
Saint Petersburg
Russia
[2]
Your account or IP address has been blocked from editing.
You were blocked by Misza13 for the following reason (see our blocking policy):
Hello. I have blocked your account citing our policy WP:USERNAME, which encourages users to register accounts which are transliterations of the non-latin (cyrylic in your case) characters. In your case, a best solution would be to register and use the account User:Gavrilov Sergey. Миша1322:33, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
User:Гаврилов Сергей
Hello Миша.
Thank.
I have understood all. I should change Username.
It is necessary to write Gavrilov Sergey
Because of bad knowledge of English, I tried to make it, but nothing it turns out.
Миша, the big request explain to me in Russian as it to make
Or if probably change mine Username on necessary.
Or completely remove me, I registration again.
On all attempts the computer gives out all the same mine Username - Russian letters.
Sorry, but I'm not Russian, but Polish and don't speak russian well enough. Anyway, I have unblocked the account User:Гаврилов Сергей. Please log on it, go to WP:CHU and post a request to change your username (to Gavrilov Sergey, for example) by following instructions given there. Миша1315:16, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You deleted Image:Henrygale2.jpg because it was "an unused fair use image". This is incorrect. Its been present, as far as I can tell, in the Benjamin Linus article this whole week, which can be verified by examining the history. It hasn't been removed. I would appreciate it if you undeleted the picture. Thanks.--CyberGhostface23:18, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Very strange. I have undeleted it now, but the image page still doesn't say it is being used (and the article doesn't display the image). Must be some rare glitch or not updated cache. :-O Cheers, Миша1323:25, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
After the image was deleted the picture was removed off the page, but part of it was after I had added it back to the page I had never bothered to remove the template. Anyway, thanks for your help in this matter, I appreciate it.--CyberGhostface03:05, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If I wanted to keep this conversation amusing, I'd say "on a daily basis". :) But I guess your question is more of a philosophical nature, i.e. "what the f*** do you think you're doing?" Well, I must say I was conflicted here - on one hand, there is our WP:BOT policy (which is majorly flawed and outdated, but that's beside the point) which requires me not only to get an approval for something that's perfectly fine to do, but also, quite possibly to go through a silly process of RfA, unless I didn't want to run it off a different account (but then I'd probably get shouted at for bypassing RfA using BRFA). On the other hand, I have the Prime Directive, as well as some serious copyright law to consider. Having weighted all factors, I have decided to apply WP:IAR selectively, help keep Wikipedia legally-safe and help some folks clean up the 3-day backlog of 1000s of images on CAT:ORFU. So far I have deleted something in the range of 10000 images in the span of 3 days (so that other admins can attend to more mind-involving issues), I have received a total of 1 (one) "complaint" (thread above), which wasn't even caused by an error on my side.
And now that we're speaking seriously, I'd like to ask you a question: Is this a problem for you? Do you question any of my deletions or just the fact that I did them automatically, saving others' (and my) time? Do you want me to release the source code so that you "know what's it doing" or do you want me to stop and go through torments of having to explain myself to the unfortunately-still-zomg-adminbot-paranoid community? (And given ProtectionBot's failure (and that was a mild adminbot, unlike this "crazy" rapid deletion script) I lean to doubt it'd get an approval.) Миша1322:31, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I'll be posting the code shortly. But here's what it does. It goes through the given CAT:ORFU subcategory and deletes every image that satisfies the following conditions:
Image is orphaned, i.e. not used in article namespace
The image page has been edited no earlier than 7 days ago (sometimes I shorten it to 6 days to finish off a day's category before the end of day)
WikiThanks Thank you for helping me sort out my monobook.js; it's really so much more useful now. Good luck, far better Wikipedian than me ;) —Xyrael / 22:30, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Two images unfortunately deleted by you, can you help?
It seems that you have deleted two images I uploaded (Image:Chaltikanaam.gif and Image:Gangulybros01.jpg), along with all the painstaking work that went into rationalizing fair use and citing sources and authors, because they were lying about quite orphaned and were tagged as such by BJBot. Very unfortunate, because I was busy at the time and could not check on WP much, if at all.
contributes a great deal without any regard for verifiability or citation policies
practices vandalism
was blocked from WP once or twice, is engaged in quite a few edit wars
...and has responded very unfavorably when I questioned his behavior about the images in discussion.
I am checking this user as much as I can, though without the tools available to admins it's quite an arduous task. But, whatever happens to this amazing user, I'd very much like to have those images back on Wikipedia. I have learned the ropes for fair use policies the hard way, and am weary of the task of reinstating the info and rationales that are required.
It would be very helpful if you could tell me what do I have to do in getting those two images back along with the rationale and info back to the article I mentioned. Please, bear in mind that none of these two images had gone through any trouble with fair use (never tagged or reported at that). The orphan state was a misunderstanding brought about by a decadent user, not a fault of the uploader (which happens to be me). Can you help, please? Aditya Kabir14:51, 15 February 2007 (UTC) - Please, respond to my talk page[reply]
Sorry to write such an epic. Well, this was the first time I requested to have images back, and probably the 50th time I got images deleted. Babbled too much... it's the nerves, I guess. And, thank you very much. Cheers. Aditya Kabir20:50, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Dear admin. You are one of the admins that deleted one of the around 70 images that became unlinked due to a change in an Infobox. This resulted in many of these images to become orphaned and subsequently deleted because they are not Free images. It took a while before the less experienced authors understood there was a problem and informed more experienced authors to look into the problem. Because these images would not be deleted if the template change had gone without problems, I ask they be undeleted. kindly -- 20:50, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
As a result of discussion on the village pump and mailing list, bots are now allowed to edit up to 15 times per minute. The following is the new text regarding bot edit rates from Wikipedia:Bot Policy:
Until new bots are accepted they should wait 30-60 seconds between edits, so as to not clog the recent changes list and user watchlists. After being accepted and a bureaucrat has marked them as a bot, they can edit at a much faster pace. Bots doing non-urgent tasks should edit approximately once every ten seconds, while bots who would benefit from faster editing may edit approximately once every every four seconds.
Speedy-deleted image has been uploaded under another name
The uploader of an image you have speedy-deleted per CSD i5 (Unused unfree copyrighted images) has uploaded the same image again as Image:Goguryeo 1.jpg. The user seems to have uploaded it mainly for display at their user page, i.e. outside article space, so it is not covered under the fair use doctrine.
The uploader says the image can be found on many South Korean websites, but I doubt that makes it public domain. I have not tagged the new upload – perhaps you can decide what to do with it? Wikipeditor13:57, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I was wondering how you made your WikiDefcon thing? I would like to make one as well....would you mind giving me a couple pointers and a blank template (I won't copy yours...that would be rude), I would greatly appericate it. Thanks! Take care....SVRTVDude(Yell - Toil)18:06, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Misza, WP:AIV is undergoing a heavy backlog. I notice that you maybe the only admin online, but could you help clear the backlog, because there is a HEAVY increase in vandalism. Thanks. Real9623:41, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Vandalism warnings
Hi. I noticed that you had to revert the Jim Carrey article a couple of times today. I wanted to let you know that I placed a Level 2 warning on the User's talk page. I thought about going straight to Level 3, but wanted to give him the benefit of the doubt.--Vbd | (talk) 01:01, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia Weekly Notification!
This is just a friendly reminder that Wikipedia Weekly has been released with a new episode!
For the first time in well, over a month, we've put something together. We've been a little busy / the tubes of the internets crashed so apologies on the delay. We're finally back to normal, we hope....
Anyways, all is good now, here's the new episodes!
Please spread the word about Wikipedia Weekly, we're trying to spread the word so that people know about the project, we've got some cool guests lined up and it makes it much more fun if people tune in!
You are recieving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery - if you do not wish to recieve such notifications please remove yourself from the list.
Well, for some reason edits like this look to me like if the article in question has been completely butchered (and in fact, the intro has been completely stripped of references). Finally, I don't like the tone of "That's as much as I'm saying." Миша1322:25, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't make that edit, Avraham did. The article does look a bit butchered, and for very good reason: the subject matter is extremely controversial. Both Christians and Rabbinic Jews completely misunderstand our religious beliefs and on Wikipedia apparently believe that they are much more qualified to define the finer points of our religion than we are. Edits or creation of Messianic Judaism articles. It is no surprise that the articles look torn. Noogster22:45, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
