User talk:Prince Godfather

This user is a sockpuppet or a meatpuppet of Prin as confirmed by the user's edits, and has been blocked indefinitely. See contribs — page moves — all logs — block log

This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia. (see: block log • contributions • page moves • current autoblocks)

Welcome

Hello, Prince Godfather, and welcome to Wikipedia! I am Deepu Joseph. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk or ask me on my talk page.
• Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~).
• Provide an Edit summary
• Take a look at Consensus of standards. It is always wise to read the talk page of an existing article before making major changes on it. Even then, I typically ask if anyone minds that I make a change. Very often they do! ;-)
• Create a User page

Again, welcome! And if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask - Just click here to leave me a message.
thunderboltz^{a.k.a.Deepu_Joseph |TALK}

Nice to know. :) I'm dropping you a few India-related links that may interest you:

	Links for Wikipedians interested in India content
Welcome kit Welcome kit - Swiss Army Knife for newcomers Register Category:Indian Wikipedians - Indian Wikipedians category Wikipedia:Wikipedians/India - Old Indian Wikipedians list Network Wikipedia:Notice board for India-related topics - Forum for India content discussions and Networking. (Shortcut: WP:INWNB) Contribute content Portal:India - India Kaleidoscope on Wikipedia Indian current events - India events page (Shortcut: WP:INCE) Wikipedia:Notice board for India-related topics/INCOTW - Vote for the Indian Collaboration of the week. (Shortcut: WP:INCOTW) Wikipedia:Notice board for India-related topics/Category Adoptions - Adopt an India category and better it. Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/India - Articles related to India for listed for deletion Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian cinema - Join the project and contribute to articles on Indian cinema. Wikipedia:WikiProject History of India - Join the project and contribute to articles on History of India. Wikipedia:WikiProject Politics of India - Join the project and contribute to articles on Politics of India.

-- thunderboltz^{a.k.a.Deepu Joseph |TALK}11:47, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Madhavan's page & pictures

Hello, Thamizhan, I noticed your contributions to the Madhavan article. I removed the pictures you added again for several reasons: a) One pciture besides the main one is okay to show how he looks in his movies -- three are much to many, his article isn't even that long. It's an encyclopaedic article and not a fanpage. If you want to add more pictures, take Shahrukh Khan`s article as an example: There, we have three pictures: one, how he looks like now, the second how he looked like than years ago and one of him on the cover of a wolrd renowned magazine. If you have pictures (with copyright information) of Madhavan how he looked ten years ago or him featured on the India Times (Gossp Magazines don't count), why don't you add those? b) most of the picture violate copyrights. You have to find out who is copyright holder of the pictures (producer, distributor, production company - pick one of those). It's not enugh to simply tell from which movie they are and where you got them.

If you need any help with finding copyright information, don't hesitate and ask me. Best regards, --Plumcouch 19:40, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Vijay pic

Hi, Thamizhan, just noticed you replaced the Vijay picture in the actor-box on the upper right side of the article. Erm, problem is: I think those pictures on actor articles, especially, the very first one within the box should enable people to identify the actor. Currently, all I identify is the big, yellow bike Vijay is sitting on. Think you could find a pic which is more about his face? --Plumcouch 17:38, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Picture and filmography

Hello, Thamizhan, the picture you uploaded to Ajith Kumar's article is violating copyright. There are notes within the picture's page which describe what the copyright violation entails. Copyright violation is taken very serious here at Wikipedia, so please stop adding the picture.

Also, please refrain from adding co-stars to the filmography. If you compare featured articles, like Eric Bana or Lindsay Lohan, you'll notice that they don't list their co-stars either. Those belong into the movies' articles. Best regards, --Plumcouch ^Talk2Me 17:41, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Pokiri and Pokkiri

Hi, Pokiri is the spelling of the Telugu film and Pokkiri is the spelling of the tamil film (official titles; for Tamil film, see the official website as well). So, I'll delete the Pokiri, currently a disambiguation page and move the telugu film article there. I'll also move the tamil film article to Pokkiri. Pl. let me know if you have any objections. TIA, --Gurubrahma 12:49, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Tamil film stubs

Hey, nice to see you adding plenty of good stubs to the Wikipedia. Could you do me one favour, use {{Film-stub}} instead of {{stub}} because I'm stub-sorting and replacing all your stubs! Cheers! Budgiekiller 10:08, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Swathi and other actresses/actors

Sorry for putting a CSD template on her, since she appears to be notable. When creating your pages, though, would you be able to provide a bit more context on each actor/actress you're writing up. To someone like me who doesn't know a thing about Indian cinema in any language, they look non-notable and context-less when you write them up that quickly. BigHaz 12:16, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Noted roles -- Ajith Kumar

Hello, Thamizhan, about those noted roles:

1. first of all, everyone has a different idea what roles of an actor are "notable" -> so in order to prevent people from adding more and more of them, just cut them.
2. Also, none of the actor articles that reached featured status (see Katie Holmes or Linday Lohan) at Wikipedia have a list of "noted roles" and generally, featured articles should be taken as an example for all the articles that aren't so comprehensive.
3. What has "noted roles" to do with "being a serious actor"? Kumar has stayed for some years in the industry, got popular, got several awards and has it's own production company -- I don't think one has to prove that he's a serious actor with "notable roles" given Kumar's achievements so far. Furthermore WP is not here to prrove anything, but merely to state facts.
4. POV sections should always be deleted as they ar enot neutral.

Best regards, --Plumcouch ^Talk2Me 11:28, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Abbas (actor)

A tag has been placed on Abbas (actor), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Abbas (actor) is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Abbas (actor). Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. --Daveydweeb (^chat/_patch) 11:57, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Change of Name

You asked: "Hi, I'm User: Thamizhan but I'm not happy with my current user name - how can I change it without deleting my contributions?"

Please see Wikipedia:Changing username for information on how to change your username. Do not create a new account yet.  :) --Yamla 20:12, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Changing_Username but first verify that your name is not taken Doctor BrunoTalk 21:00, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the others who answered when I was away. You need to appoach a bureaucrat for that. Nicholas is one that I know. -- Sundar ^{\talk \contribs} 08:27, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Chiranjeevi‎

Hello, Thamizhan, Thanks a ton for the heads-up: I cleaned up the page - have a look - what do you think? If fangush is added once again, I'll request the article to be protected. Best regards, --Plumcouch ^Talk2Me 18:53, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Box office Records info

Hi Thamizhan, I read many articles by u such as something something unnakam ennakam, vettaiyaadu vilaiyaadu, ghilli, and many more. I am not sure if it is u or not that is keep on adding false news about box office records info. if it is u, give a citation of where u got those records from. this is unreasonable. how can ghilli make more than Rs. 600 million?? only chandramukhi and Pokiri are the only 2 films which crossed the 40 crore mark. Please fix to all those sites u gave wrong information about or give a URL. Thanks a lot.--Arjun1591 12 September 2006

Edit Summary

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.

Dep. Garcia 16:29, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Tireless Contributor Barnstar

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		awarded in recognition of your contribution to Tamil Cinema. Doctor BrunoTalk 21:16, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Jyothika

You've moved the Jyothika Sadanah article twice now. Would you happen to have any references to the fact that she changed her surname? I didn't see any news item to that effect. Thanks!

BTW, a separate issue is that when you move an article, you should fix up double-redirects. See where Jyothika leads to. Ambarish 08:30, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

I didn't see a response and went ahead and reverted your move. Ambarish 16:58, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

page move

Hi, could you explain why you did the following?

• 19:13, September 8, 2006 Thamizhan (Talk | contribs | block) (moved Articles nominated for deletion to Srikanth (actor))

I have to say that I can't figure out why it is you did this. --- Deville (Talk) 02:33, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

My extremely strong and sincere apologies. I read that backwards and thought you did the opposite. -- Deville (Talk) 16:37, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Reema Sen

Hi Thamizhan. I appreciate your effort towards adding more content related to Kollywood. However, the Reema Sen image is copyrighted and can used under fair use only to illustrate the poster and not the person. If you have sufficient fair use rationale, feel free to add the rationale to the image description and readd the image. Otherwise, copyright patrol bots will delete the image anyway. Please read the policies that I've linked to in my text above. Thanks. -- Sundar ^{\talk \contribs} 07:24, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Madhavan (noted roles)

Hello, Thamizhan,

about Madhavan's notable roles: what qualifies them as "notable"? Isn't it a point of view if a role or a movie is notable? As for being friends with Aamir Khan and rest: could your cite a source? And it's not important if a courting was committed - how do you know that? They married - isn't that the only thing which is important? Best regards, --Plumcouch ^Talk2Me 17:41, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the Tamil wikipedia Contributions

Thanks a lot for contributing Tamil wikipedia. I appreciate if you could get user account--Umapathy (உமாபதி) 13:10, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Box Office Info

Hello Thamizhan

I thought i told you earlier that don't give false box office records and info unless you give a URL or a website. How in the world can Something Something Unakkam Enakkam gross 20 crores on opening day?????? Not even Bollywood blockbusters grossed that much. Please fix all the articles you have screwed up so that other viewers on Wikipedia will not be given false information.

Thanks,

Whoa Whoa!!

I did not leave you any threat. I only told you to fix any articles by deleting the box office info or provide any URL supporting your edit. I did not leave you a threat for your information. Also i did not leave any pornographic picture. you can clearly see on other articles more explict than this. It is a still of Anusha from the film Super. If that bothers you, tell me so that i can change it. Last of all, why should i leave wikipedia? i am not harming anybody. wikipedia is my hobby and i love to spend my time on it. Arjun1591 14:45, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Pictures

Before you tell me to fix all the pictures I uploadaed, first you should check on yourself to fix pictures with out licensing or summary such as pokkiri. also fix the Filmfare Awards South. You just copied and pasted. And your telling me that my information is not inappropriate? Arjun1591 21:45, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Ajith Kumar

Hello, Thamizhan. As you probably noticed I removed parts of Ajith Kumar's filmography (director, co-stars) and the "Notable roles". I raised the issue about these to parts of articles in general at the Wikiproject Indian Cinema and got response from fellow editors. In order not to start an edit war, maybe you could contribute in the debate here [1], and maybe we find a solution acceptable for everyone. Best regards, --Plumcouch ^Talk2Me 14:24, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:The Seven World Wonders

Template:The Seven World Wonders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. MCB 18:28, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry just so used to using the phrase ... didnt intend offence222.155.21.111 19:49, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Dubbed movies

Hello, Thamizhan, about the "dubbed movies". I tried to insert the filmography without costars, and directors, as none of the featured actor pages include these. I tried to remove all dubbed movies which I recognized as such, but apparantly, I have not succeded. If I add the cleared filmography again, would you just remove the dubbed movies I have missed? Thanks a ton. Best regards, --Plumcouch ^Talk2Me 16:41, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Ilaiyaraaja

Thanks for your rating of the page. Could you please provide comments/reasons for the rating given to it? It would be helpful in improving the article. Cheers. Splashprince 10:02, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

COTW candidacy (R.Madhavan)

This is with reference to the copyright laden images of cine artists. It is really nice to see more related images in the articles. However the following guidelines would help you to get the better off the images you are uploading...

• You don't have to save a digital copyrighted image from an official website. A decent digital photo of a newspaper clipping or a glossy magazine would make sure it is not copyrighted and you can personally realease them into public domain. And focus on the upper torso for the main image, leaving out the clutter behind.
• The photos doesn't have to be very recent or from a recent film. Because, we are identifying the actor, not the actor in the film.
• Since those article pages can be considered as biographies, you can add more photos taken at different ages, so that it could depict their schooling or their parents. Remember, an artist's life doesn't start from the date he/she acted in films. Its from birth to death. It is true that getting information beyond the public life is tough, but that is why we are here for... to tackle it and provide a comprehensive NPOV approach.
• Cite as much articles you can. But it is not good to cite if the article says that the artist is the smartest hunk or sweetest beauty. Unless of course, if we can find if that artist had won significant awards like Miss India or Mr India, it is better to avoid those descriptions mentioned above.

Best wishes. I'll try to butt in, whenever i can. ;) -- Chez ^{(Discuss / Email)} • 23:22, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Redirection of Janaki

Hi, You have changed you have changed redirection of link janaki to S Janaki. But janaki means sita. I request you to create a disambiguation page instead. Thanks Lokesh 2000 03:49, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Sorry

I'm really sorry about complaining about you to Yamla, but I requested an explanation as to why you kept reverting the page but you gave me nothing of the such. If that was the case, you should have just removed those sections from the article. Besides, I think the reader of that respective page has the right to know what the main actor or actress might be playing in the movie. Whatever's happenned, I truly am sorry for doing that. Next time, I will voice my complaints to you first before taking it somewhere else. Apologies. --Hariharan91 04:17, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Kamal Hassan

Hello Thamizhan, thanks a ton for the Barnstar. It's really appreciated. I agree about imroving Kamal Hassan's article - he *is* such a famous actor in India and definitely deserves to become featured. However, there is much to do on his article. I suggest the following:

1. A picture with proper copyright status. (The one on his article does not cite copyright holder or source - and does he always look like this?)
2. A filmography, which also notes his roles (but not his co-stars and directors: all of the featured articles of actors don't have those.)
3. More references, if possible from sources like TimesOfIndia.com, BBC, Sify or Rediff. Those seem to be relatively gossip-free.
4. Kick the Noughts. He has played in lots of great and famous movies, but no featured article has "Noughts" on them. To stay neutral, I suggest we leave any judgement about his abilities out. It's up to readers to judge about that.
5. I suggest to take the articles of Katie Holmes or Diane Keaton as role models: both of them have been featured, include lots of references and are quite neutral.

What do you think? Best regards, --Plumcouch ^Talk2Me 13:40, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

I would appreciate a note as to why you deleted my comment about vote solicitation on the ARCAID page without comment or an edit summary. Thanks for your time. Dekimasu 14:46, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Billa

Can you please try to find the name of the other Rajni in the movie  Doctor Bruno  23:28, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Are you talking about other Rajini name in Billa movie? I think it is Ranga??--Indianstar 13:50, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Please see the History of the article. I have not added anything which I have not started. Also I have renamed the heading as "Articles/Stubs/Redirects" instead of just "Articles" which was the cause of confusion. But still I cannot understand when you say random things created by others Can you please point out the Article that has been created by some one else for which I have taken credit. If there is one like that, it is by mistake and I am ready to correct the mistake and apologise with the concerned editor  Doctor Bruno  19:01, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Reg Assessment on R. Madhavan

Hi Thamizhan,

We welcome your nomination for assessment on R. Madhavan. The article has been rated B-Class. Please see the comments for the rating on the talk page. Happy Editing. Cheers. -- Chez ^{(Discuss / Email)} • 22:32, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

What POV??

Please refrain from any editing on the article Chiranjeevi. For your information, I did not talk in my point of view. I just gave facts. Arjun1591 22:51, 2 November 2006 (UTC

Do not indulge

Hello;this is referring to the "Ban on Kollywood films" sections you've written in Tollywood article.This year more number of Telugu films were hits and only one film dubbed from Tamil(SANDAIKOZHI) was a hit.Comment on this.Barring 6 in 2005;tell me how many dubbed films of Tamil made money during 2002-2004 period?(Except Boys and Pitamagan).Success of dubbed films are a temporary phenomenon;when the local industry is in recession.For;when Kollywood was in recession during 2000 or 2001;more number of dubbed films were released than original Tamil ones and also made money!Stop trying to create discord among Indian users for flimsy reasons. Moreover; in many articles I've observed that in the name of removing Pov;you only add more of your POV. S.GaneshKumar 09:32, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: Third holiest site in Islam

Hi Thamizhan, You wrote "STRONG DELETE per nom a whole lot of Muslim POV." on this AfD - would you mind clarifying what you meant? Cheers, Tewfik^Talk 16:44, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Nayanthara

WTF you dont believe Nayantara is so fat?

Note on multiple image galleries

Note Image:Babitakapoor.jpg says

It is believed that the use of a limited number of web-resolution screenshots

   * for identification and critical commentary on the film and its contents
   * on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation,

qualifies as fair use...... --ArmadilloFromHell 18:14, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Rename

As requested, I have renamed you as User:Prince Godfather. You should now move your userpages to the new name, and might like to recreate this account and request that it is blocked, to prevent impersonation. Warofdreams talk 00:16, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi Prince Godfather. I hope you do not mind, but I deleted the cut-and-paste move of your talk page and moved the page properly. Now, it retains its edit history. Regards ×Meegs 02:13, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Kamal Haasan

Hi, I have voted in Kamalhassan articles for improvement page. I am happy to see your contributions to Kollywood. I think we should try to make Kamalhassan page along with Sivaji,Ilayaraja,Rajiniganth pages to Featured articles level. Probably we can include Arunprasad,Ganesh,Dr.Bruno and others who are showing lot of interest in Tamil movies. --Indianstar 12:30, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the note on my talk section. I haven't been able to substantiate the Dambachari (10 roles by a single person) 'record', with facts, and I would appreciate if there is some link you can refer to me to prove/refute it.

For articles on Indian persons, there seems to be a proclivity to make them hagiographies, rather than fact-based biographies. Whom are we trying to impress? As a prolific Wiki-user, what do you think of this trend of embellishing truths to make the personality look larger than life? Thanks. Sudar 14:26, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Articles for deletion

Articles you have created, notedly about the actor Madhavan such as Yaaravan Nalam, Aaval, Hello Zindagi and Ivan Yaaro have been nominated for deletion. If you want these articles remain, please provide concrete reasons as to why you feel they should remain on the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yaaravan Nalam
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaval
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hello Zindagi
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivan Yaaro

Thanks! -- Visual planet 12:46, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

What nonsense. That could have been you faking as Maddy. And how in the world would you expect me to believe that the letter that you have brought up has been written by Madhavan himself? Don't you think he has better work to do than to come to Wikipedia and watch us nominating his articles for deletion. Sorry, not buying it! Please provide a better reason. You can bring this issue to an administrator if you want, but I am sure they will think the same as me. -- Visual planet 17:59, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Rajini Punch Dialogues

I have started subsection called Punch dialogues in Rajinikanth article. Can you update that list when you get time? --Indianstar 13:04, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Hello!

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		Awarded in recognition of your contribution to Tamil Cinema. User:Anwar saadatUser:Anwar saadat

Ivan Yaaro

A tag has been placed on Ivan Yaaro, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article is a repost of either already posted material, or of material that was previously deleted under Wikipedia's Criteria for deletion. If you can indicate how Ivan Yaaro is different from all other articles, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}}, and also put a note on Talk:Ivan Yaaro saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we ask you to follow these instructions.GameKeeper 18:01, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

if you think this article should be undeleted please see Wikipedia:Undeletion policy GameKeeper 18:12, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

The article has been deleted by concesus reached by the WP:AFD process. The way to recover it is to follow the WP:UNDEL process. GameKeeper 20:12, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Aaval

Hey Prince. I just wanted to tell you, I think you should move the Aaval page to a page like Untitled Ram Gopal Varma Project or something of the sort. The title hasn't been confirmed yet and well, the link you provided, isn't really reliable because anyone could have posed as Madhavan. Regards -- Visual planet 10:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

2480

Did you know that you are number 2480 on this list? -- Jreferee 19:01, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Madhavan

I'm not sure why you would redirect Madhavan to R. Madhavan when there are 5 different people with that name that have a Wikipedia article. At the very least, you should add a link to the dab page. You seem to be a fan of R. Madhavan but don't let it cloud your judgement: losing the link to Madhavan (disambiguation) is not helpful. Pascal.Tesson 00:10, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Jeez, nice to see you engaging in constructive dialog. I've reverted the redirects to go to the disambiguation page. I've also reordered the disambiguation page alphabetically which, incidentally, is the way that all disambiguation pages are ordered. Pascal.Tesson 05:35, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

??? Come on... Now you're just being silly. Note that some other editor has reverted your last change to Madhavan (disambiguation). Pascal.Tesson 16:14, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

ArbCom voting is on

It would be nice to know your stance on this vote [2] Anwar 16:45, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Please use edit summaries

Hello. Please be courteous to other editors and use edit summaries when updating articles. The Mathbot tool shows your usage of edit summaries to be very low:

Edit summary usage for Prince Godfather: 13% for major edits and 86% for minor edits. Based on the last 150 major and 134 minor edits in the article namespace.

Using edit summaries helps other editors quickly understand your edits, which is especially useful when you make changes to articles that are on others' watchlists. Thanks and happy editing! --Kralizec! (talk) 18:25, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Happy X-Mas

happy holidays to you too. I'll do my best to fill up the gaps in Kollywood and Tollywood. Idleguy 03:35, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

New Seven Wonders

Hi - I undid your changes to the (admittedly confusing) New Seven Wonders of the World article and Seven Wonders of the World disambig page. If you want to change them back - and you may be right, since there's no absolutely best way to be clear with two "events" of the same name but of quite different approaches - please bring it up on the New Seven Wonders talk page first; this has already been the subject of some discussion. - DavidWBrooks 21:29, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

I will do my best

Thanks Godfather.Sure I will do the maximum .I can.I will as much films as I can.Harlowraman 16:35, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

I appreciate your work and all but i prefer you made more Tamil films by Devayani.

Thanks Prince Godfather

Lage Raho Munna Bhai

Hi, thanks for your addition to the Production Section but could you please provide a source confirming that is true, otherwise I will be inclined to delete it. Thanks. Nobleeagle ^[TALK] [C] 22:55, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Bollywood

Do you have some knowledge of Bollywood? You are currently crossing path with another editor who created article in masses, and I am trying to assertain how much reality and/or notability is in those articles. Agathoclea 19:29, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Jeans (film)

Ah, it's not a very good idea to use the Wikipedia mainspace as a sandbox (that's what we have user subpages for). I recommend that you work on the article at User:Prince Godfather/Jeans (film), so readers won't get confused into thinking that Jeans and V for Vendetta are the same movie. Cheers, Khoikhoi 00:10, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

user:Prince Godfather is currently blocked and unable to edit. I have copied the text of Jeans (film) into the page mentioned by Khoi as it stands at present. I have reverted the version of Jeans (film) to a version before user:Prince Godfathers recent edits. I hope this will make it readable until user:Prince Godfather is able to resume editing, when I hope he/she uses a sandbox. GameKeeper 02:12, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

New Year

Happy new year King Dracula 12:35, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

CBB7

Please don't do this as it would be very confusing for people expecting to go to an airport article. Instead make it a disambiguation like this. You can read about them at Wikipedia:Disambiguation. Also I see this page is getting long and you might want to archive some of it. Take a look at Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 12:09, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

South Indian Cinema and Music Award It is surprised to see that you have not got this barnstar so far. Your contributions to South Indian Cinema is extraordinary. Congratulations. Indianstar

Khatarnak

Hello Prince Godfather,

If you don't mind, I would like to know why you changed the title of the film Khatarnak to Mr. Khatarnak. Not anywhere on the logo does it say Mr. Khatarnak.Arjun1591 01:01, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Award

This Wikidefender Barnstar is awarded to Prince Godfather for tireless efforts to defend Wikipedia from all the evil people and maladroits. Well done!! Lord Lubbuka Das 14:19, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Correcting your user page

Nice to see that you are getting more awards. You deserve these for your dedication and commitment towards enriching wikipedia contents.

"Leave me a message" in your user page takes to talk page of your old user name and even message left there is not getting reflected in your user pages.(Do you have any specific reason to retain it in that way?) Can you correct that to point to your user name. --Indianstar 03:38, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism on Aalwar page

User:59.144.12.64 has heavily vandalised the Aalwar page, please may you see to him getting punished.

Thanks

Cheers

Pokkiri 18:40, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Ilaiyaraaja

Dear Prince: Thank you for taking interest in the Wikipedia article of Ilaiyaraaja. He certainly has made a lot of wonderful music. I added yesterday a whole new section to the article dedicated to Ilaiyaraaja song clips. I wonder if you could kindly check and see if the clips works on your computer, and if they sound clear and nice. I would also like you to tell me what you think about the song clips there. About Ajanta, it is really interesting to know that the maestro has composed 36 songs altogether for the project. It is quite an achievement. I think the statements that you added about this would more perfectly fit into a separate article on the film Ajanta. Maybe you can create it. I believe the interesting information you provided would best belong there. I truly appreciate you helping me with improving the Ilaiyaraaja article. I hope we can together make it into a Feature Article someday! (It is already an A-class article). AppleJuggler 01:20, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

AfD Nomination: Abhay

An editor has nominated the article Abhay for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhay. Add four tildes like this ~~~~ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Abhay during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 17:57, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Request for Comment

There is a Request for Comment regarding Wikipedia administrator Yamla, located at Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Yamla. If you believe you have anything to add, please consider doing so. Thank you. Justen 15:06, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Varalaru - History of Godfather

Hello, Prince Godfather, I'm currently trying to imrpove Varalaru - History of Godfather - however I haven't seen the movie and I don't know Ajith Kumar's films very well; maybe you can help - so far the summary is still kinda messed up. Also, there are notes of a German release (among others) on that page - I didn't know Kumar's films are shown in Germany - do you have information on that or suggestion on how to verify that claim? (I have my doubts - earlier, it was written that the film got a "PG"-rating in Germany, however Germany rates with the FSK-System and not with the academy of motion pictures-system). Maybe you can have a look? Best regards, --Plumcouch ^Talk2Me 22:15, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello, Prince Godfather,

no, unfortunately, I haven't seen Jeans and neither Godfather, however I wish I had, so I don't know anything about the plot. I'll look around the 'net - maybe, some review sites or Amazon write something about it. And about that Germany-release; it would be most unfortunate if Godfather would really have been released there, because in that case I WOULD HAVE MISSED IT!! Thanks for your swift reply, best regards, --Plumcouch ^Talk2Me 00:18, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for your message. Happy editing :) Cookie90 09:30, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi Prince

I was wondering how to become an aadministrator?

please tell me

Czesc26

Madhavan again

Don't change the redirect from Madhavan, you have already had it explained to you why here User_talk:Prince_Godfather#Madhavan. GameKeeper 18:02, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Dispute

I'm sorry, this is really out of my league. I wish I could help. You may want to see WP:DISPUTE. I'm pretty sure you already know about the requirement to cite using reliable sources, etc. etc., but those links may be useful for you. --Yamla 21:36, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Speedy Delete

Please learn to give atleast one source for articles you create. Do not remove the tags. Anwar 11:57, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

If the source is available only on print media, scan it and upload the image to a free server and duplicate the link with tinyurl.org. Then give that shortcut here. Anwar 12:08, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

OK I will talk to you for one last time. You voted unfairly the Aalwar - opening for deletion even though I produced almost a dozen links. Nee enna periya paruppa? Naan un vishayathil thalyidatha podhu nee edhuku kannu mookai nulaikkirey. Anwar 12:00, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Did you really have to do this?

Did you really have to do what you did to Ganguly family (films)? In you haste to reinstate a blatantly copyvio gallery, which was earlier removed from the article, you removed painstakingly sourced and rationalized images of the subject. Now those images have been deleted from database for being orphaned. And, in doing so you also reinstated loads of mis-spellings that other editors have corrected bit by bit.

Did you really have to do it? All that from a winner of all those barnstars and a protector against vandalism! I am surprised, pained and really shocked. Could you, please, explain your behavior to my talk page? Aditya Kabir 13:24, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

You said "Excuse me, but it was your images that were Copyvio, the gallery being their was fine! Duh. Understand the situation before you open it!"

You really mean that? Haven't you noticed that you did not create a new gallery, but reinstated an older one already removed for copyvio reasons. That "fine" gallery has been removed once again for the same reason. And, how can you say "my images" were copyvio? Have you or anyone else ever reported them as such? And, how does your statement explain your reinstating a lot of mis-spelling for no apparent reason? Please, I'd like to understand all that from someone more experience than I. Aditya Kabir 14:28, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Okay. So, you're not interested in explanations. Sorry about that request then. Well, I didn't believe you have an explanation anyways. Cheers. Aditya Kabir 16:31, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

I know

i know i did a good job anyway i'm sure manikanda will be released before april and seethakalyanam's shooting is over, now it has some financial problems so it will be released as soon as possible.

Re:Rude Personal Message

Ideally you should talk to him about it, and raise it on WP:ANI so that admins can take a closer look at his history and block him. Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 15:40, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

hi1

hi this is lisa from Bangalore,India.not quite sure you are the movie actor maddy or not.pls confirm as i am doing an assignment reguarding your page in wikipedia. thanks. regards, lisa

Citizen

Hello Prince Godfather,

I have deleted box office information of the article Citizen (film) but it seems that you have again placed it back. May I ask why you are doing this? Please provide a link to back you up. Thanks. Arjun1591 18:50, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

MOSLOW (Filmography)

I think it would be a good Idea not to use WP:LOW form for Bollywood actors and basically for all actors because People prefer it to be vice-versa compared to the format it is following now and I did read the section regarding Filmography in WP:LOW and it doesnt say anything about that method applying for Films. When new Films are added new users and anons find it hard to add it to the list because they dont know how to and I have just finished Fixing the Filmography section for Shah Rukh Khan. Somebody should fix this problem as soon a possible becoz it is slowly by slowly becoming a problem..Cheers..--Cometstyles 16:08, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Recent image uploads.

The images you have uploaded recently;

1. Have links to the OTRS system that seem to be incorrect.
2. Are described as coming from 'your mate' but you have listed yourself as the author. This is inconsistant .

Can you correct. GameKeeper 23:01, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

please correct immediately or I will be forced to request deletion of these images GameKeeper 01:52, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

AfD of Filmfare Awards South related articles

Hi, I nominated an article you created for deletion. You might be interested to drop by to give your opinion. Cheers! -- lucasbfr ^talk 12:56, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Hello Prince Godfather..How r u? Can you tell me how to add copyright to a picture and text..pls thankxx

hi

Thankx Prince

Articles for deletion notices

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from an article, as you did at Filmfare Best Actress Award (Tamil). Only the administrator who closes the AfD may remove this notice. Thanks! Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me Please review me!} 12:35, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm really not sure what your aim is with this article, but please don't blank content without an explanation. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me Please review me!} 12:37, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Ah! Sorry about that, if sourcing was your concern, I certainly won't revert you. You might want to consider using a descriptive edit summary, though, so people know what you're doing. Especially given the previous AfD removal (which of course still can't be removed), it can be difficult to tell what's going on without that. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me Please review me!} 12:41, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

thankx Prince well i like ur user page too u r doing a great job.

Image:Shriyanew.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Shriyanew.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 23:36, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Ishaa Koppikar article

Hi

I've noticed that you and me seem to be making a lot of edits to the article on Ishaa Koppikar. Rather than keep cancelling each others' work out maybe it would be better to agree on a few things so that we can make this article 100%.

I've got a few suggestsions, which I want to run by you to see what you think.

1 - Let's keep the unreleased films in the filmography and state that they're unreleased. Anyone wanting to know what films Ishaa has made need to know the unreleased ones as well as the released ones and so long as it's made clear what the film's status is there should be no mix ups.

2 - Can we clarify once and for all that the main image on the article is not from Don. It's on the cover of my Dharma the Warrior dvd, bought from Nehaflix. I know dvds can be released years after the film comes out, but I've seen that image on the internet long before Don was being promoted.

3 - The main article text needs a tidy up. No changes, just a few alterations to make it read smoother: eg The film, shot in London and Chenai, became a commercial blockbuster on release and won the lead actors rave reviews. That kind of thing.

4 - If Qayamat is a noteable role (nominated Best Vilain), shouldn't Kyaa Kool Hai Hum be a notable role too (nominated Best Comedy performance) rather than Don.

Let me know what you think.

Regards --Chris750 19:03, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Blatent falsifying of copyright info.

You added copyright info to this image,[3] Which is blatently copyied from this image [4]

The 'reply' from the company is just too similar to be anything other than a copy and paste. Do you have any explanation. GameKeeper 16:10, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

I am investigating this matter with the source website. If it turns out that you have fraudulently falsified this information, we will take serious and immediate steps against you. Such an action would be absolutely inexcusable and at the very least, would likely result in a permanent ban from editing the Wikipedia. Note also that Wikipedia may release your personal information in response to a valid subpoena or other compulsory request from law enforcement. Please see our Privacy Policy. Please do not take this as a legal threat, I am simply pointing out to you that if you use Wikipedia to break the law such as by fraudulently and wilfully violating copyright, the law holds you, not Wikipedia, liable. --Yamla 17:57, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

You were caught deliberately falsifying OTRS information. Your actions have deliberately placed Wikipedia in legal jeopardy and given that you have been blocked in the past for copyright issues, I can see no alternative other than blocking you indefinitely. You are welcome to contest this block but please note that your actions have been reprehensible. While blocked, you are not permitted to edit the Wikipedia, either using this account or any other, or from an IP address. --Yamla 20:17, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

What is this???, I clearly wrote to behindwoods.com as per Hariharan Nambiar had did to nowrunning.com - and I got an instant e-mail notification - which I copied and pasted - which you can see for proof!!! nowrunning.com and behindwoods.com are governed by the same commitee if you did not know! I request an unblock, as I believe I have done NOTHING WRONG. As per earlier images of Vijay, [[[Rajinikanth]] and Asin Thottumkal they were taken off mates of mine who - one of whom is a cameraman, the other a resident in Spain, the other my mate who lives in Southall. I also believe that a couple of my previous blockings were errors as confirmed by you afterwards. I have made close to 8000 edits on En Wikipedia and consider myself to be a good editor who works hard. And by the way, why is my brother, also an editor under User:King Dracula blocked ??? Is it wrong for siblings to edit wikipedia per User:Hariharan91, User:Chelsea123 and User:Maddy20 - who all seem to be brothers or sockpuppets. Check using edit history King Dracula and I have different edits while as editing at different times, for instance I have been away for the last 2 days on a expedition but he has kept editing! So how does that make hima sockpuppet. Why am I blocked indefinitely, other editors editors like User:Arjun1591 and User:M.arunprasad have got away with murder in image cases. The previous having more than a hundred image problems, with 1 block from you. I rquest an unblock, please reply in the positive, I wish.

Yours sincerely,

Prince Godfather 20:50, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Also check the message below, about my work on the R. Madhavan article who I have single handedly bought GA status. Revelaing the truth, I was User:Prin but I have made sensible and constructive edits since the blocking of that and have definitely not used anything for sockpuppetry purposes Prince Godfather 20:55, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Prince Godfather (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Re-check my edits and their notability

Decline reason:

This is enough for a permanent block without other reasoning (which would also be enough for a block). Goodbye. — 〈REDVEЯS〉 21:55, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please note that this user has admitted to being an abusive sockpuppet of an indefinitely blocked user. Also, this block has been reviewed by at least three other administrators and found to be appropriate. Please see The discussion on WP:ANI. A decision to unblock should not be taken lightly. --Yamla 21:35, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Prince Godfather 21:14, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

This is even worse than I thought. You admit to being an abusive sockpuppet of an indefinitely blocked user, Prin (talk · contribs). As such, you were already not permitted to edit the Wikipedia. And your comments above do not in any way address your fraudulent falsification of OTRS permission information which is the proximate reason this account has been blocked. Your block has been reviewed by multiple administrators. Your deliberate attempt to place Wikipedia in legal jeopardy by making fraudulent claims about image licensing permissions has left us with no option but to block you indefinitely. We will most likely have to go back and revert all of your edits made with this account. I am stunned and disappointed at your reprehensible actions and your apparent willingness to harm the Wikipedia. --Yamla 21:35, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

But, I have done constuctive edits and I've got evidence of the e-mails if i could send to you privately. And how am I an abusive sockpuppet? How is the information false, you haven't even seen the e-mail? Go back and revert all the edits - Wikipedia - 7000 edits - that's unruleful considering all I have done. How have I harmed Wikipedia with this user: nothing. My blocking has been jumped into a conclusion without the real explanations. I will show you evidence, is this enough to unblock me.

Please, I beg of you to unblock me, I promise never to upload an image again if it means of me getting unblocked, its because I really enjoy editing Wikipedia, and many other editors have praised me due to this. Most of my edits have been significant and worthy. Eg. R. Madhavan article which I brought from a Stub to a GE and as said by User:Derek.cashman it could become FA! Yamla, I feel you know what I feel like at the moment - heartbroken for doing nothing, and finding out after a tiring day back from an expedition - knackered. If you insist on blocking me, do so for a day or a week - but not indefinitely please! Then I'll be depressed. Not being rude, I feel depressed :(. Hope you can reply in the positive to my sorry pleas. Prince Godfather 22:09, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Prince Godfather (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Redvers has no proof,, that those were fake, those were real images. I have done nothing bad. Why don't people understand me. I feel absolutely knackered. :-(

Decline reason:

It is a serious violation of copyright to suggest that there were OTRS tickets for any images. If there were, someone else who is affiliated with WP:OTRS would have tagged them.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 23:06, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

But, I have done constuctive edits and I've got evidence of the e-mails if i could send to you privately. And how am I an abusive sockpuppet? How is the information false, you haven't even seen the e-mail? Go back and revert all the edits - Wikipedia - 7000 edits - that's unruleful considering all I have done. How have I harmed Wikipedia with this user: nothing. My blocking has been jumped into a conclusion without the real explanations. I will show you evidence, is this enough to unblock me. Please, I beg of you to unblock me, I promise never to upload an image again if it means of me getting unblocked, its because I really enjoy editing Wikipedia, and many other editors have praised me due to this. Most of my edits have been significant and worthy. Eg. R. Madhavan article which I brought from a Stub to a GE and as said by User:Derek.cashman it could become FA! Yamla, I feel you know what I feel like at the moment - heartbroken for doing nothing, and finding out after a tiring day back from an expedition - knackered. If you insist on blocking me, do so for a day or a week - but not indefinitely please! Then I'll be depressed. Not being rude, I feel depressed :(. Hope you can reply in the positive to my sorry pleas. Prince Godfather 22:09, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Prince Godfather (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

But adminstrators it is real, there is no evidence that it is fake, if you sk me, I'll show you proof, but at the moment I seem to be blocked for no reason.

Decline reason:

Yamla has given sufficient proof that you have been fooling wikipedia all along. And please see Wikipedia:No legal threats. Due to your abuse of the unblock tool and due to your legal threat, I am locking this page. — Aksi_great (talk) 12:11, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The thing I don't understand is, that no clear evidence or proof has been given for my blocking. I would like one - if not I might be forced to take legal action for misuse of rights and for conclusions without evidence. I request for an unblock - so I can carry on editing Wikipedia, without causing any haram as I did before. I repeat If you unblock me, I will never upload an image ever again - as that is why (but I don't understand why) I have been 'blocked'. Please may I be unblocked? - considering all you have done is take someone's view who knows nothing about anything and use that right to block me without knowing any background info. Prince Godfather 12:04, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

There is proof for your blocking. You uploaded images and claimed that they had permission stored in an OTRS ticket. I had someone with access to this database look up the information and this was shown to be blatantly false. You have yet to explain why you falsified this information. Additionally, you created this account to get around a block placed on Prin (talk · contribs) and as such were never entitled to edit using this account. Either of these actions is sufficient to warrant an indefinite block. That you did both means we will no longer entertain unblock requests. --Yamla 22:27, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

R. Madhavan GA review

I reviewed your article on R. Madhavan and found that it looks great. There are a couple of minor tweaks to fix, so I left notes on the article's talk page regarding this (mainly, the article needs references/citations for a few unsourced sections). Fix these few things, and I think the article is ready for GA status. Cheers! Dr. Cash 20:25, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

List of top Tollywood films Converted to AfD nomination (originally unsuitable speedy)

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of top Tollywood films, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of top Tollywood films. Thank you.

--User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:18, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Harrow

A tag has been placed on Template:Harrow requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 06:34, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Oram Po

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Oram Po, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Oram Po. Guy (Help!) 16:45, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Veeru Potla

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Veeru Potla, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP. Not enough information to show notability. WP:CREATIVE.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Black Kite 17:21, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Koffee with Anu, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: "Koffee with Anu" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 01:32, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vedant

The article Vedant has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notabilty

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Derek Andrews (talk) 19:10, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Silandhi

The article Silandhi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Film with no refs at all that is all plot and does not seem to pass wiki guidelines for films.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 02:04, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Koffee with DD

The article Koffee with DD has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable tv program.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:19, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Ramprakash for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ramprakash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramprakash until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nerd1a4i (talk) 18:45, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Kiran Rathod for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kiran Rathod is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiran Rathod until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:06, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Suman Setty

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Suman Setty requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PageImp (talk) 17:47, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

"Yogi(film)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Yogi(film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 4 § Yogi(film) until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)