User talk:MinTrouble

Welcome!

Hello, MinTrouble, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to One Standard German Axiom. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Pbritti (talk) 03:14, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! MinTrouble (talk) 06:43, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Headings

Hello, MinTrouble. In a recent edit to Linguistic insecurity you added a MOS:PSEUDOHEAD. That is, you used boldface markup to give the appearance of a heading, rather than equals signs (==Like this==) to create actual headings. This can cause problems for screen readers, and is discouraged by the Manual of Style.

I removed the pseudohead and made some other changes to your text. You may want to look at it to make sure I didn't misunderstand what you wrote. Happy editing, Cnilep (talk) 03:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Cnilep. I appreciate your help. Peace. MinTrouble (talk) 17:33, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Illegal National Socialist has been accepted

Illegal National Socialist, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 18:29, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hi MinTrouble! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Josef Matthias Hauer that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 06:39, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Manfred Bierwisch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berlin Academy of Sciences. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you MinTrouble (talk) 19:51, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Stephen Fry, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:52, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pedagogical Academy of Vienna moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pedagogical Academy of Vienna, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dewritech (talk) 07:14, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Biographies of women

Hi there, MinTrouble, and thank you for creating a detailed biography of Sneja Gunew. If you intend to continue along these lines, you might like to join WikiProject Women in Red where we are trying to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. You can sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 12:45, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for following up on this and welcome to Women in Red. In connection with further work on biographies, you might find it useful to look through the guidance on our Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Essays/Primer for creating women's biographies. I have taken the liberty of adding the WiR template to your user page where others will be able to see your interest in the project. Please let me know if ever you think I can be of assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 07:09, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Faith Avis

A tag has been placed on Faith Avis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

R2, see page history at User:MinTrouble/Faith Avis. It appears that the author wants to incubate in userspace

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fathoms Below (talk) 20:03, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red October 2024

Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320

Online events:

New: Women in STEM | Geofocus: Islands I-P | Women in archaeology

Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative)

Announcements from other communities

October is Women in Green's "Around the World in 31 Days" Good Article Edit-a-thon

Tip of the month:

Unsure how to expand a stub article? Take a look at this guidance

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Nomination of Kyra Belan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kyra Belan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyra Belan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bearcat (talk) 17:33, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I honestly thought I was doing the project of Women in Red a service. Kyra Berman was one of the red listed names.

The express deletion of Faith Avis (above) I saw only after the fact. There the idea was to highlight the women who enabled their husbands to become famous. Faith Avis was a newly documented case, one of the early Canadian women with a B.A. I was surprised to read that this would trigger a self-spawning suspicion and express deletion.

I defer in both of these cases to the judgement of others. MinTrouble (talk) 19:14, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't be discouraged by this. Many have made the exact same assumption when beginning their editing career, that if a person is on a redlist they are inherently notable. It is absolutely an honest mistake, but please note that each relist states "This list of red links is intended to serve as a basis for creating new articles on the English Wikipedia. Please note however that the red links on this list may well not be suitable as the basis for an article. All new articles must satisfy Wikipedia's notability criteria with reliable independent sources." Best, --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 18:43, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to ORF (broadcaster) and Am Dam Des. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 21:24, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. MinTrouble (talk) 02:06, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Faith Avis (October 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thilsebatti was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Faith Avis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thilsebatti (talk) 14:08, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MinTrouble! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Thilsebatti (talk) 14:08, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red November 2024

Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323

Online events:

New: Asian women | Geofocus: Islands Q-Z | Women in engineering

Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative)

Announcements from other communities

Annual Wikipedia Asian Month (WAM) is an online campaign designed to boost
Asian content on Wikipedia each November.
Unreferenced articles backlog drive. These Wikiproject clean-up lists offer a start
to November's backlog drive, e.g. Women's History and Women writers

Tip of the month:

Looking for an image? Sometimes you can find openly licensed images at
search.creativecommons.org/

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:45, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Welcome to the drive!

Welcome, welcome, welcome MinTrouble! I'm glad that you are joining the November 2024 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Fix a random page lacking sources

Cielquiparle (talk) 12:39, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Faith Avis has been accepted

Faith Avis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Thilsebatti (talk) 13:10, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Sammy Basso

On 5 November 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sammy Basso, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sammy Basso was the oldest known person with progeria? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sammy Basso. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sammy Basso), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:16, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 14,491 views (609.1 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of November 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I've begun dreading Wikipedia notifications and delay opening them, so your positive message was a nice surprise. MinTrouble (talk) 02:22, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on Andreas Heusler

Hi there! I see you've made a few edits to Andreas Heusler but that you seem to be citing sources that mention Otto Höfler rather than Heusler. I'm a bit confused about what's going on here and have left you a couple of comments on the talk page for Heusler. I wonder if you could find the time to reply? Thanks! Alarichall (talk) 08:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eberhard Kranzmayer (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Apart from sections without references I have other issues. You move into the present tense, and you appear to draw conclusions, this is terms WP:OR and/or WP:SYNTH

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eberhard Kranzmayer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:42, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello MinTrouble! Your additions to Melania Fogelbaum have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 23:59, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I am aware of copyright rules, though I may have underestimated the "completely from scratch" principle. I went back to double check on what is at Melania Fogelbaum now and made changes to be on the safe side. Can you tell me which part was flagged and was removed as showing similar wording to another source? I thought I took safeguards not to take over more than generic phrases... MinTrouble (talk) 05:50, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have temporarily undone the revision deletion so you can have a look. here. Diannaa (talk) 12:44, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I see what you were referring to. Thanks, this can be put back intro the post-deletion state. MinTrouble (talk) 22:18, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]