User talk:Melissa Highton
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Melissa Highton, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!
October 2013
[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ida Freund may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- College, Cambridge]], as a demonstrator. In 1890, she was promoted to staff lecturer in chemistry (1893–1912. She was an associate at Newnham College and then a member of its council<ref>{{cite web|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:23, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot
[edit]
|
Hi Melissa Highton! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Periodic Table Cupcakes (January 7)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Periodic Table Cupcakes.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! LukeSurl t c 00:13, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Periodic Table Cupcakes (January 14)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Periodic Table Cupcakes.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 16:09, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Periodic Table Cupcakes
[edit]
Hello Melissa Highton. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Periodic Table Cupcakes".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Periodic Table Cupcakes}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:47, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Another welcome!
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia again, Melissa Highton! If you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. It would be great if you could add your name to the list of participants on the Women, Science and Scottish History editathon series event page, and please feel free to communicate with other participants on the talk page for the event. You can talk about articles to edit, tips for editing, or help each other practice - whatever you like!
Remember, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
Wikipedia Science Conference
[edit]Hello Melissa, You're receiving this update because you asked to be informed about the Wikipedia Science Conference taking place in London on 2nd and 3rd of September. Thanks for your interest.
The call for proposals is now public and session proposals are coming in. The two keynotes, and some other invited speakers (including yourself), have graciously accepted. In mid-May we will bring together a programme, a publicity poster, and an online booking form. Then we'll begin the main publicity and will need your help getting the word out.
I know what you'll be talking about, but please put in a session proposal: the deadline is the 8th May. This is far from the only way to be involved. The conference will need session moderators, a programme review group, and other volunteers: if there is a specific role you are interested in, or if you have any other questions, please email me at m.l.poulter
bristol.ac.uk.
There will be a large "unconference" session in the programme and - fingers crossed - a "hackathon" event two days later on the Saturday, so even if you do not have a proposal accepted, you will have a chance to shape the conference activities.
Please pass on the word to any colleagues who might want to put in a proposal or help the conference in any way. Cheers, MartinPoulter (talk) 12:23, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Melissa and thanks for the excellent proposal. I hope you'll be able to attend the whole conference but for the sake of travel, I will put you in the programme early on the second day. Before I finalise the programme, I need to consult other conference organisers and proposers but I hope before long to issue a draft programme. Cheers, MartinPoulter (talk) 15:15, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Scottish Fairground Culture Editathon
[edit]Hey there! As a Wikipedian in Scotland I thought you might be interested in the Scottish Fairground Culture editathon taking place on 7 May at the Riverside Museum - drop me a line if you'd like to know more! Lirazelf (talk) 11:15, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oh dear, linkfail! Here's the correct one... Scottish Fairground Culture Editathon Lirazelf (talk) 10:05, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
History of Medicine editathon
[edit]Hello again, Melissa Highton!
Apologies for taking so long to get back to you after last week but am just recovering from the flu. Thank you so much for hosting, guest speaking & taking part in the History of Medicine editathon. Just so you know, we uploaded in excess of 500 images to Wiki Commons, created 4 brand new articles on Wikipedia, and improved a further 56! For the event page, click here or to see the whole illustrated story of the event then you can click here: Storify: ILW editathon 2016
I hope that you enjoyed the day, and that we'll see you on Wiki again soon.
Now that you've learned - or refreshed - the basics of editing using Wikipedia’s Visual Editor, I hope that you'll stay logged in and edit or create more articles. I've added some booklets and some links below that you may find useful.
-
How universities are teaching with Wikipedia -
Editing Wikipedia brochure -
Instructor Basics, How to use Wikipedia as a teaching tool -
Illustrating Wikipedia brochure
Here is a link to a User Guide which covers the main things to remember about using Visual Editor.
See you soon! Ewan / Stinglehammer (talk) 01:58, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
|
Disambiguation link notification for March 6
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anne Finlay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eric Robertson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
WIR A+F
[edit]
  | |
|---|---|
|
Hoping you enjoyed the recently-held in-person Art+Feminism meetup, | |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 19:48, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Art+Feminism: Modern Scottish Women 2
[edit]Hi there! Thanks so much for coming to the Editathon on Saturday. I hope you enjoyed it, as ever if there's anything I can do to help, just ask. Lirazelf (talk) 11:46, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Wikimedians in residence
[edit]Hello, I have noticed your contribution to Wikipedian in residence. Are you personally possibly that Wikimedian in residence at the University of Edinburgh? (for the university as a whole, not just the university library, I mean) If so, I would be interested in getting in touch and sharing experience, having been myself a Wikipedian in residence at Masaryk University in Brno, Czech Republic, since February 2015. I do not know about other universities which maintain such a position today, at least in Europe. --Blahma (talk) 21:33, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for creating the article on Anne Finlay, who was my great-aunt. My siblings and I were excited to see Dorothy Johnston's portrait of her as the front cover image for the catalogue of the Modern Scottish Women (presumably this is not usable in the article). Just for your interest, some extra non-reliable information about her: she was the second child of Ninian Finlay (her older sister, b. 1896, was my maternal grandmother, and there were two younger boys), and always known in the family as "Anno". She left her house in Sheen Road, Richmond to my mother, and after Anno's death (from breast cancer) we lived there from 1964, as later did my sister and her family; my sister still owns a number of her paintings, as well as some furniture etc, and some works by Connard, Ernest Proctor and Dorothy Johnston). She originally wanted to study at the Royal College of Music (I still have the piano she would have used), but her parents would not allow this, so she went to the Edinburgh School of Art instead. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 12:08, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Contacting Editors from the Ada Lovelace Editathons
[edit]Dear Melissa,
I hope you don’t mind me contacting you via your talk page. I’m a new Editor to Wikipedia, part of a small research team based at the University of Birmingham in the UK. I’m getting in touch as we’re trying to contact all the Editors who were involved in the Ada Lovelace Editathons in Oxford or London. If you have been, or still are, involved in editing, whatever the scale of your involvement, we would be very grateful for the opportunity to talk to you about your experiences. In the first instance, we’ve set up a short (10 minute) survey, which you can access via my User Talk Pages. If you are interested in helping with our research project, please can you drop me a line?
Thanks, --RuthPage (talk) 16:14, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for your reply and for completing the survey. I very much appreciate your help.
--RuthPage (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:03, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
A page you started (Brenda Moon) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Brenda Moon, Melissa Highton!
Wikipedia editor Dps04 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
reviwed. Will continue to improve the article.
To reply, leave a comment on Dps04's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Nomination of Judith Kaplan Eisenstein for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Judith Kaplan Eisenstein is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judith Kaplan Eisenstein until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... Lhealt (talk) 14:58, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Melissa Highton, this is what usually causes my wikimistakes
Coolabahapple (talk) 17:04, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Melissa Highton. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Robert Evan Kendell copyright problem
[edit]Some of the material you included in the above article was copied from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/1417352/Dr-Robert-Kendell.html, a copyright web page. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:00, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Cram101
[edit]Hi Melissa, you added a source to Block cipher for #1lib1ref, but unfortunately Cram101 is not reliable and I removed it. They copy info from Wikipedia and paraphrase it. The info it cited is also cited with another reference; could you check if that reference supports what it cites or whether another source is needed? More on "books" like Cram101 is in WP:PUS. Fences&Windows 19:36, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Melissa Highton. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Melissa Highton. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar |
| I think this is yours - great work Victuallers (talk) 16:18, 6 March 2021 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for April 3
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Allison Bailey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LGB. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
| to say a wee thanks for your help on creating page for Prof. Liz Grant and also on the recent women's wiki-editathons and support to folks learning in general. Kaybeesquared (talk) 13:08, 5 April 2021 (UTC) |
Nomination of Maya Forstater for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maya Forstater until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Mccapra (talk) 19:11, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Daily Mail reference at Maya Forstater
[edit]Hi. Please do not use the Daily Mail as you did at Maya Forstater. It is not a reliable source. See WP:DAILYMAIL. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 18:57, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Lisa McVey for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa McVey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Mccapra (talk) 03:35, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Frederick Douglass
[edit]Congratulations on your mention in The Washington Post.
My most recent encounter with Douglass was his Unknown Loyal Dead[1] delivered at Arlington on Decoration Day in 1871, as cited in Guelzo.[2] --Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 22:05, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
References
- ^ Douglass, “Unknown Loyal Dead” (1871), Life and Times of Frederick Douglass, Written by Himself (Park Publishing Co., 1882), p. 506;
- ^ ALLEN C. GUELZO (2011) A War Lost and Found
Just FYI
[edit]Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Users_adding_images_to_articles_at_a_high_rate_of_speed, Cheers, Johnbod (talk) 13:54, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Conflict of interest
[edit]Just FYI, your edits at pages of University of Edinburgh faculty or associated people (such as Linda Bauld, Rowena Arshad, Talat Yaqoob) present a conflict of interest. As you have declared on your user page, your association with the university makes these edits questionable. Instead, it's better to request changes on those articles' talk pages. I hope that makes sense. – Broccoli & Coffee (Oh hai) 22:50, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 10
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MicroMasters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queen's University.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red
[edit]Hi there, Melissa, and thanks for all the biographies of women you have been creating. I have seen that several of their talk pages are tagged Women in Red but as far as I can see, you are not yet a member of the project. You can join using the box at top of the project's main page. I think you would be able to inspire many more contributors to write articles about women and their works, especially as you come from such an active centre of interest as the University of Edinburgh. In any case, keep up the good work.--Ipigott (talk) 10:56, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- So pleased, Melissa, to see you've signed up. If you have not already done so, you might find it useful to look through our Primer for creating women's biographies. I see you are able to draw on the assistance of your Wikipedian in Residence but please let me know if you think I can help you in any way. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 07:58, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
November 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:30, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
50 ways
[edit]Regarding your recent query about a deletion attempt, please note that there is a variety of processes for this including speedy deletion and proposed deletion, which do not have discussions. If you need assistance with such cases, please feel free to contact me for advice and assistance. Andrew🐉(talk) 14:35, 29 October 2021 (UTC) Thank youMelissa Highton (talk) 14:44, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
@Andrew There is now a deletion proposed for an article I started https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jess_de_Wahls. The person proposing didn't contact me. It's been reviewed as start class and has references, can I just delete the proposal as my objection?Melissa Highton (talk) 21:30, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- Hi. I've removed the PROD tag as I can clearly see multiple news sources from BBC News and The Guardian that talk about Jess de Wahls. As PRODs are only supposed to be for uncontroversial deletions (and a subject that has multiple, dedicated news pieces is not that), I've removed the tag. And you are right, you can remove the tag as an objection, though it helps to give a reason. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 22:41, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
I see, thank you Ritchie333. Melissa Highton (talk) 22:42, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- As an aside, you may find Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Red is a good place to find assistance with biographies of women generally, as there are more eyes looking there. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 23:42, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Conflict of Interest re Dwayne Fields
[edit]
Hello, Melissa Highton. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.ديلي سبايدر جلي (talk) 11:21, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I have no relationship with Dwayne Fields, in fact I had not even heard of him until I read this article in the Guardian which came into my feed about COP26. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2021/oct/28/dwayne-fields-first-black-briton-north-pole-polar-bear-young-people Melissa Highton (talk) 12:06, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- I've been asked to look at this. How could a university professor have any direct relationship with a polar explorer and television presenter? If Melissa says she has no connection, I believe her, so I'm removing the COI notice because of no evidence. By the way, thank you, Melissa, for all the work you do on Wikipedia. I've been "outed" as a feminist by SusunW; I'm not a woman but my partner is and so are lots of her friends, so I work with Women in Red on their behalf. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:36, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- There's currently no COI in the article becuase I have removed the peacock statements which were supported by sources that the subject is directly connected to. Therefore, apart from off-wiki evidence existing that shows a digital marketing junior working for Fields attempting to comission the page, Highton's content itself is a smoking gun. I find it hard to believe that a Wikipedian who is also a university lecturer and therefore knows the difference between a primary and secondary source would attempt to pass off a link to the agency that represents Field's public speaking interests as seen [Fields&oldid=1052474962|in this diff] had a pushy digital marketing manager not forced thier hand. In the same diff we can also see this peacock statement "He was inspired to overcome advertisty and engage in outdoor challenges" sourced to a certain sugary drinks company's website. Finally there's this
"He works with youth groups, including The Scout Association to inspire young people in inner cities to explore the outdoors. [1]" sourced to his scout group's website. Now I don't want to take this to ANI or COIN becuase I can't be bothered with their bureaucracy and I'm assuming neither can you two. However, I want to know, if like you say you "had not even heard of him until I read this article in the Guardian which came into my feed about COP26" then why didn't you base the article on those secondary sources? Why did you use at least three sources that the subject is directly connected to? Did someone insist that you included the links?
- ^ "Dwayne Fields". stratfordscouts.org.uk. Retrieved 2021-10-29.
ديلي سبايدر جلي (talk) 14:18, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Daily Spider Glee, can you explain how "he experienced urban violent crime" is "promotional waffle"? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:21, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
I am sorry this is causing you concern. I don’t have any knowledge of your off-wiki previous info, or any marketing people, or that the stratford on avon scouts are his troupe particularly. To me they are just scouts and he’s listed as an ambassador. I read the article in the guardian that morning. I though he sounded interesting and remarkable/notable. I searched Wikipedia and found that he had no page, which was surprising as he’s on the telly and a rare case of being a black british polar explorer. I made the page and took it with me to our ( Halloween ) Women in Red editathon that afternoon. People there did comment that this was unusual for me as I usually write about women, but we agreed that he was probably notable and some editors there helped to improve my refs and categories. I am sorry that you didn’t like what I wrote or the refs I used. I usually aim for a bit of engaging biographical story , a few really good references, some educational background and then some from the wider media to show range. When I start a stub article I always expect that people who know more about the topic will join in and improve, since the hardest thing is to get started. I’m happy to learn about better referencing and the rules, which is why I enjoy our editathons so much. Melissa Highton (talk) 16:37, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Precious
[edit]encouraging others
Thank you for quality contributions such as Jess de Wahls, Dumbie House and Dwayne Fields, for embracing Wikipedia in education, for encouraging others to take part in editathons and improve the encyclopaedia, – you are an awesome Wikipedian!
Gerda Arendt Could you log this in the usual place, thanks! Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:37, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- yes, - Melissa, you are recipient no. 2667 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:56, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Thank you Gerda Arendt and Ritchie333 you are very kind. It is lovely to be part of this community and I appreciate the support of other editors. Melissa Highton (talk) 08:43, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A kitten for you!
[edit]
Thanks Melissa for your help yesterday and all you are doing for WiR and equality in the wiki world! Here's a cute kitten (sorry if you're not a cat lover).
Kaybeesquared (talk) 13:02, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
January 2022 with Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article Emma Shuttleworth has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Subject is not obviously notable - WP:N, meeting neither WP:GNG nor WP:NACADEMIC ... at least on the basis of what has been included in the article.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tagishsimon (talk) 21:05, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
Straight quotes
[edit]Re Emma Shuttleworth: don't forget that Wikipedia only uses straight quotes, whether single apostrophes or double quotation marks. I've fixed the ones in this article, but was a bit surprised to see them in an article from such an experienced editor. Happy New Year. PamD 09:10, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
I will blame it on my new glasses. Melissa Highton (talk) 11:28, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Emma Shuttleworth for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma Shuttleworth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Tagishsimon (talk) 10:52, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
- See updated article Emma Shuttleworth for additional cited evidence.Kaybeesquared (talk) 16:47, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Great North Bog
[edit]
On 8 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Great North Bog, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that coir is saving the Great North Bog? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Great North Bog. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Great North Bog), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
February with Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article Student Hubs (charity) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not enough in-depth sourcing from independent, reliable sources to pass WP:GNG or WP:ORGDEPTH.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 12:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Sea rewilding
[edit]On 17 February 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sea rewilding, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that seas are being rewilded with seagrass (example pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sea rewilding. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sea rewilding), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
|
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 13,382 views (1115.1 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of February 2022 – nice work! |
Bruxton (talk) 05:37, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
March editathons
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
DYK for Reef burials
[edit]On 11 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Reef burials, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in the UK, your remains can shelter baby lobsters? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Reef burials. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Reef burials), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you Melissa Highton (talk) 12:53, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Well done on DYK Melissa! Kaybeesquared (talk) 13:57, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
|
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 7,128 views (594 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of March 2022 – nice work! |
Bruxton (talk) 14:43, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
New message from Narutolovehinata5
[edit]
Message added 01:49, 21 March 2022 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:49, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
- Melissa, I see that you are posting on the article's talk page. You need to respond to any queries in the nomination template: Template:Did you know nominations/Raptor persecution. The template's content gets transcluded onto the talk page. If you reply on the talk page, nobody knows that you have tried to respond because nobody is watching the article talk page. I will move your comment to the template. Schwede66 02:05, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
April Editathons from Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:45, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
DYK for Raptor persecution
[edit]On 3 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Raptor persecution, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that raptor persecution is a crime against birds of prey, and in Scotland, ravens are afforded honorary raptor status? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Raptor persecution. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Raptor persecution), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Great article and DYK Kaybeesquared (talk) 16:34, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
May Women in Red events
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:53, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June events from Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:21, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Good to meet again in virtual Edinburgh. FYI, having made a start on the wife of Argentocoxos, it seemed good to have a go at a mural, to better understand the issues. I made a start on an article with the apposite title of from this moment despair ends and tactics begin. This contains links to lots of other similar works by Banksy and so these may be a good model for work on your mural.
I'm now going to work on Crawford's Biscuits – a major industry founded in Leith and inventors of the Custard Cream! The article needs some urgent assistance... Andrew🐉(talk) 16:21, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- OOOh! the scottish bread wars leading to the demise of the custard cream sounds like a potential DYK to me! Melissa Highton (talk) 16:33, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- That works for me, <LOL>. Artw seems to be kindly helping out too so watch out for edit conflicts. Save early and often! Andrew🐉(talk) 16:41, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Looks like there are a lot of sources available, in books particularly, but detangling them will be an effort. Have mainly looked at this because I'm assessing the created dates of the current batch of AfD noms, but I will probably loop back and work on it. Artw (talk) 16:44, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in July 2022
[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:48, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Greetings. The article Maya Forstater does not seem to be in any danger of being AfD nominated. Is it necessary to retain at its Talk Page the don't-delete admonition? ("Please do not delete but instead offer constructive criticism as to how this article could be improved if necessary.") -The Gnome (talk) 17:28, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red August 2022
[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:59, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Grace Ononiwu
[edit]Hi @Melissa Highton: Regarding the infobox, it needs to be reasonably heavily populated to make it worth it and useful for the reader on mobile. If you can expand it, it would be ideal. scope_creepTalk 07:38, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Editing it now.. Melissa Highton (talk) 07:41, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in September 2022
[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:36, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2022
[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:00, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red November 2022
[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Happy Friday
[edit]
|
Awesome Wikipedian Award |
| Thanks for joining us today! Stinglehammer (talk) 13:02, 28 October 2022 (UTC) |
Women in Red in December 2022
[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:55, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2023
[edit] 
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in February 2023
[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:28, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red March 2023
[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:54, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination of Elaine Miller for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elaine Miller, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elaine Miller until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red April 2023
[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
CS1 error on Menopause in the workplace
[edit] Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Menopause in the workplace, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:04, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Draft:Madge Elder
[edit] Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Draft:Madge Elder, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:44, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red May 2023
[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:28, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A goat for you!
[edit].jpg)
Thanks for your edits on Madge Elder
EMtraining01 (talk) 12:33, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you. Melissa Highton (talk) 12:34, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
A squirrel for you!
[edit]
|
The don't do as I do award |
| Thanks for editing Madge again EMtraining01 (talk) 12:35, 28 April 2023 (UTC) |
A pie for you!
[edit]
|
enjoy the pie, thanks for all you do on wiki Kaybeesquared (talk) 12:40, 28 April 2023 (UTC) |
Women in Red - June 2023
[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red July 2023
[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red 8th Anniversary
[edit]|
|
Women in Red 8th Anniversary |
| In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2023
[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:25, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2023 at Women in Red
[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Victuallers (talk) 16:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2023
[edit]
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - November 2023
[edit]
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red December 2023
[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2024
[edit]
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red February 2024
[edit]
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red March 2024
[edit]
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red April 2024
[edit]
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red May 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red June 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:58, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2024 at Women in Red
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:00, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2024
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Awesome Women in STEM champion
[edit]
|
Ada Lovelace Award |
| Thanks for joining us for some Wiki Women in STEM knowledge activism today! Stinglehammer (talk) 14:55, 8 October 2024 (UTC) |
Thanks for your contributions to Helen Kay. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ... discospinster talk 05:22, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2024
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:45, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Precious anniversary
[edit] | |
| Three years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:22, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)