User talk:Dede2008

Welcome!

Hello, Dede2008, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Solar eclipse of March 9, 2016, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Pmlinediter (talk) 08:42, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Solar eclipse of March 9, 2016

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. As the article namespace is for encyclopedic content and not tests, the page you made will soon be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Pmlinediter (talk) 08:42, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Solar eclipse of March 9, 2016

I have nominated Solar eclipse of March 9, 2016, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solar eclipse of March 9, 2016. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Habanero-tan (talk) 08:52, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Solar eclipse (2016 March 09).gif

Thanks for uploading File:Solar eclipse (2016 March 09).gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 08:56, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SE2024Apr08T.GIF

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SE2024Apr08T.GIF. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 20:14, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

adomas!

Boleh saya tolong mas? mereka tak tahu apa kamu mau sini. Did you want to run a bot? The request is empty, just say if you want it or not, and I will help. Penyulap ☏ 01:48, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Petojo Selatan, Gambir

The article Petojo Selatan, Gambir has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Too small a geographic domain for a justifiable article- clearly taking things too small

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Satu Suro 14:35, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Duri Pulo, Gambir

The article Duri Pulo, Gambir has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Too small an area - not justifiable no possible WP RS or WP N reasons

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Satu Suro 14:36, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gambir, Gambir

The article Gambir, Gambir has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Too small an area and no possible WP:RS or WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Satu Suro 14:37, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kebon Kelapa, Gambir

The article Kebon Kelapa, Gambir has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Too small an area for reasonable expectations for WP:RS and WP :N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Satu Suro 14:40, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mohon maaf

Kelurahan terlau kecil - tak bisa mencari informasi cukup !! to meet the very important WP:EN concern with WP:N and WP:RS... !!! Satu Suro 14:43, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Transclusion of articles

Please do not tranclude articles into your user namespace. They show up in article categories. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 22:51, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

Hi. Some of your recents edits were reverted due to wp:OVERLINKING. Please have a look at our manual of style and avoid adding improper wikilinks. Thanks. - DVdm (talk) 09:20, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rouge rubis

Hi Mbak. I get that you're trying to help with the Rouge rubis article but, and please don't take offense to this, your edits aren't helping. I don't know if you're using google to translate or else your English is not very good, either way the content you're adding is pretty unintelligible. Also I see you've been welcoming new users, which is great, but in future try to only welcome new users that actually make edits, every day thousands of people make accounts that they never use to edit, as a general rule we don't welcome them unless they do--Jac16888 ^Talk 01:10, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Don't forget

You still have questions waiting for you at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Mbak Dede. You also need to create a separate account ending in 'bot' to run it on. Rcsprinter (converse) 16:01, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BAGBot: Your bot request Mbak Dede

Someone has marked Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Mbak Dede as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:10, 31 March 2012 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place {{bots|optout=operatorassistanceneeded}} anywhere on this page.[reply]

Templates

Hi - as you may have seen, I have removed the categories you had transcluding from templates are re-added them manually to the articles in question. Having the categories present on the actual page has many benefits, including sorting options (see Category:Cempaka Putih, Jakarta) and it allows for easier changes to happen without having to edit the complex programming of the template. Please try to remember this in the future. Cheers! "Pepper" @ 15:44, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Gambir, Jakarta

Template:Gambir, Jakarta has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Satu Suro 06:02, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Petojo Utara, Gambir for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Petojo Utara, Gambir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petojo Utara, Gambir until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Satu Suro 06:12, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cideng, Gambir for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cideng, Gambir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cideng, Gambir until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Satu Suro 06:13, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Duri Pulo, Gambir for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Duri Pulo, Gambir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duri Pulo, Gambir until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Satu Suro 06:14, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Petojo Selatan, Gambir for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Petojo Selatan, Gambir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petojo Selatan, Gambir until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Satu Suro 06:16, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kebon Kelapa, Gambir for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kebon Kelapa, Gambir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kebon Kelapa, Gambir until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Satu Suro 06:17, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gambir, Gambir for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gambir, Gambir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gambir, Gambir until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Satu Suro 06:18, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sundanese Wikipedia

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sundanese Wikipedia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. WWGB (talk) 14:36, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Permisi

Your Project ? to create kelurahan articles in Wp en?

You seem to have not responded to the deletion or prod notices - your creations do not have WP:N, WP:RS, and little or no text -

please respond, to explain your project here on talk, - please read the discussions - anything less than a Village - is a big problem.

Creating empty stubs like Sundanese wikipedia, and your kelurahan stubs - is going to fill this talk page with deletion notices - please try to understand what WP:ABOUT and WP:NOT actually mean - in english.

Are you sure you should not be helping out in WP:id - ? Please do not copy over material from WP:id that do not have WP:RS - we take it very seriously here on WP :en!!!

Satu Suro 15:10, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Contoh

Gambir and Johar_Baru sudah cukup - WP:en tak bisa atau mau lebih kecil daripada itu!! to make smaller stubs is pointless, the project is pointless if all you are doing is copying across from WP:id - there are good reasons to stay at Gambir and Johar Baru.

Please try to understand that creating stubs with no content, WP:N and WP:RS issue is going to see others want to PROD or DELETE your project... Satu Suro 15:20, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cempaka Putih Timur, Cempaka Putih

The article Cempaka Putih Timur, Cempaka Putih has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Satu Suro 00:03, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cempaka Putih Barat, Cempaka Putih

The article Cempaka Putih Barat, Cempaka Putih has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Satu Suro 00:03, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rawasari, Cempaka Putih

The article Rawasari, Cempaka Putih has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Satu Suro 00:04, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please dont

Please do not copy from WP:id - how many times do I need to ask you not to? Wikipedia does not need lower level village articles. How can I get you to understand that? Mungkin coba jelas dalam bahasa indonesia, tetapi bahasa saya sudah keras, saya lupa banyak Satu Suro 01:09, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Indonesia project on WP:en - lihat itu - maybe you could look at -

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Indonesia

The problem with simply creating new village, kecamatan articles - what is the point? Specially if there are no english source materials?

Please understand that WP:en Indonesian articles are not mirrors or duplicates of WP:id articles - there are different standards of WP:N, and WP:RS hardly ever appear on WP:id articles.

If you are keen to help the WP:en Indonesian project - maybe we could discuss further some of the issues of existing articles, sampai nanti Satu Suro 01:26, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and sorry - re your talk page item - WP:id or other wikipedias are not source material - please read WP:RS - please Satu Suro 01:28, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Galur, Johar Baru

The article Galur, Johar Baru has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Satu Suro 01:30, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jumadi Abdi

The article Jumadi Abdi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. *Annas* (talk) 02:40, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

Hi. When you recently edited Bank Central Asia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Third party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

Hi. When you recently edited List of administrative villages of Jakarta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gambir (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Behad bali

Hello Mbak Dede. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Behad bali, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 14:01, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pornography in Indonesia

Please do not copy articles from other language wikipedias unless you are capable of properly translating them yourself, WP:TRANSLATION is the correct procedure, please follow it in future--Jac16888 ^Talk 12:32, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol

Please consider not patrolling new pages until you have clearly understood the principles involved. By tagging Kelsey Motors as uncategorised, you have allowed a blatant hoax to remain online. You can learn more about page patrolling here. Thanks. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:06, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Marzuki Alie

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Marzuki Alie. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:11, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dede Yusuf

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Dede Yusuf. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:12, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dede Yusuf

The article Dede Yusuf has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Bgwhite (talk) 07:04, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrolling

Hi. Do you not see the difference between a completely blatant advert and an article that just needs Wikifying? (see: Cream Bell). I've asked you before to onsider not patrolling new pages until you fully understand the principles involved. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:08, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Solar eclipse of september 8, 1801

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Solar eclipse of september 8, 1801 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Harry the Dog WOOF 09:10, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You clearly have not learned from previous speedy nominations of eclipse articles. Always develop articles in user:Dede2008/sandbox (or any page with a title starting user:Dede2008/) before you launch them into the (article) namespace. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:52, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your question on the Village Pump

Hey, Dede2008. I deleted your question from Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous), because requests for help don't belong there. If you still need help with reporting link spamming, let me know. Also, next time you need to know how to do something on Wikipedia, here are a few options:

On your talk page, put {{help me}} and a description of your problem. Someone will come to help.
You can go to the help desk or the teahouse, two forums where users can ask for help.
You can search the project pages yourself, by adding wp: before your search query.

Hope that helps! ʝunglejill 23:12, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Dede2008. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by benzband (talk) 10:15, 18 June 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

CVUA

Hello, Dede2008! The instructors at the Counter-Vandalism Unit Academy have seen your hard work reverting vandalism, and we would like to thank you. But do you want to go to the next level? Would you like to know how reverts, warnings, reports, blocks, and bans all come together to keep this Encyclopedia free from disruption? Then consider enrolling today! Electriccatfish2 (talk) 21:36, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Electriccatfish2 (talk) 21:36, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for spamming in the form of multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid ^(Talk) 15:53, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you create another spam account, this next block will be indefinite. Elockid ^(Talk) 11:28, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dede2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I dont want create spam account/sockpuppet again. If I create, please block i indefinite. Dede2008 (talk) 11:08, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That's exactly what we'll do. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 14:05, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

During the duration of your block, you evaded it. But not only that, you spammed once again. So I have now blocked your account indefinitely. Elockid ^(Talk) 14:39, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to CVUA!

Hello and thank you for enrolling in WP:CVUA! I have accepted you as my student, so I will be your instructor. The first thing I would like to discuss is how to identify vandalism. Have a read of WP:Vandalism and I will explain some of my own experience to you. Elizium23 (talk) 20:32, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, somehow I doubt that I can instruct you under the auspices of CVUA if you keep getting yourself blocked for spamming. So consider yourself expelled. Elizium23 (talk) 14:47, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dede2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not spammed during my block. But, other users who uses my IP for spam used it to spam. Please unblock me.Dede2008 (talk) 14:44, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The editor has been extended WP:OFFER. This involves absolutely ZERO editing of Wikipedia, either anonymously OR with a userid. This involves a requirement to become involve in any other Wikimedia project, and show positive edits upon your return. If you edit Wikipedia at all within 6 months, the WP:OFFER will be withdrawn. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 19:25, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocking admin comment:The way you tried to conceal the most recent spamming was to me a deliberate attempt to mislead people/throw people off the trail. (Note that I cannot discuss specifics here because this involves private information). Elockid ^(Talk) 15:00, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can I create new username? (I dont want spammed again) --Dede2008 (talk) 15:04, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you mean change your account name by having it renamed, yes that is possible. You can contact a bureaucrat. However, you can't create a new account until your current block is lifted. I would highly recommend that you take the standard offer for now. Elockid ^(Talk) 15:08, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How to take the standard offer? (I promise i dont want create sockpuppet, link spam, etc.) --Dede2008 (talk) 15:15, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What you do is take a break from here for about 6 months. You can still contribute in other projects so I suggest you go there. If you can prove that you will no longer disrupt Wikipedia by evading your block (socking) and spamming during the time period, then you can contact an admin to request an unblock. You can also contact me in 6 months through email. If I find that you haven't been socking and spamming, I will unblock your account. Elockid ^(Talk)

Ok, I will extend the offer. Dede2008 (talk) 23:04, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the 2013 WikiCup!

Hello, Dede2008, and welcome to the 2013 WikiCup! Your submissions' page is here. The competition begins at midnight UTC. The first round will last until the end of February, at which point the top 64 scorers will advance to the second round. We will be in touch at the end of every month, and signups are going to remain open until the end of January; if you know of anyone else who may like to take part, please let them know! A few reminders:

The rules can be found here. There have been a few changes from last year, which are listed on that page.
Anything you submit must have been nominated and promoted in 2013, and you need to have completed significant work upon it in 2013. (The articles you review at good article reviews does not need to have been nominated in 2013, but you do need to have started the review in 2013.) We will be checking.
If you feel that another competitor is breaking the rules or abusing the competition in some way, please let a judge know. Please do not remove entries from the submissions' pages of others yourself.
Don't worry about calculating precisely how many points everything is worth. The bot will do that. The bot may occasionally get something wrong- let a judge know, or post on the WikiCup talk page if that happens.
Please try to be prompt in updating submissions' pages so that they can be double-checked.

Overall, however, don't worry, and have fun. It doesn't matter if you make the odd mistake; these things happen. Questions can be asked on the WikiCup talk page. Good luck! J Milburn and The ed17 23:20, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help

Hi, Dede2008. Thank you for fixing the {{db-multiple|g11|g12}} tag on The Oberoi, New Delhi. Peter aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:39, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. --Dede2008 (talk) 10:44, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on your user page, User talk:Panesaragricultureindustries, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages: user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you can indicate why the page is not blatant advertising, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to your user talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also edit this page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would help make it encyclopedic. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Gtwfan52 (talk) 12:12, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, as you did at User talk:Panesaragricultureindustries, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Gtwfan52 (talk) 12:17, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User rights requests

Hi. I'm just letting you know that I have declined your request for 'reviewer'. Please do not make any more requests for additional user rights for at least six months of warning-free contributions and editing. Thanks. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:14, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sundanese Wikipedia

The article Sundanese Wikipedia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable version of Wikipedia: the article either includes only non-independent and self-published sources (especially Wikipedia itself), or has no sources at all.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. eh bien mon prince (talk) 00:41, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ôn Keuë listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ôn Keuë. Since you had some involvement with the Ôn Keuë redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:40, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dede2008. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dede2008. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Petojo Utara, Gambir

The article Petojo Utara, Gambir has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced for over 5 years - maps and context inadequate to sustain notability?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JarrahTree 10:29, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Kelurahan

Template:Infobox Kelurahan has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:29, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dede2008. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dede2008. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi Dede2008. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! – Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:02, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

	Thank you
	Thanks for welcoming me into the world of wikipedia Quantum squid88 (talk) 18:31, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

My apologies. It won't happen again. However I would like to request a legitimate historian to review the Siam and China section. Maybe it will help to have the Vox colonialism page on the references. Thank you. Crediblesourcesplease (talk) 16:01, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Newslinger talk 09:59, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Anarchyte (talk • work) 15:29, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of solar eclipse visible in Indonesia

Hello, Dede2008. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of solar eclipse visible in Indonesia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:04, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of solar eclipse visible in Indonesia

Hello, Dede2008. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of solar eclipse visible in Indonesia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:57, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited COVID-19 vaccination in Indonesia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kudus. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiEagle - January 2022

The WikiEagle

The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter

Volume I — Issue 1

Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle

Announcements

After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name The WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its sub-projects. If you wish to continue receiving The WikiEagle, you can add your username to the mailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please let us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged.
On 16 December, an RfC was closed which determined theaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which is cited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue.
Luft46.com has been added to the list of problematic sources after this discussion.
The Jim Lovell article was promoted to Featured Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Hawkeye7.
The Raymond Hesselyn article was promoted to Good Article status on 4 December after being nominated by Zawed.
The Supermarine Sea King article was promoted to Good Article status on 22 December after being nominated by Amitchell125.
The William Hodgson (RAF officer) article was promoted to Good Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Zawed.

Members

New Members

KingAviationKid (Joined on 17 December)
PatrickChiao (Joined on 22 December)
Wp9097 (Joined on 16 December)

Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921.

Closed Discussions

Featured Article assessment

Jim Lovell (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 26 December 2021

Good Article assessment

HAL Tejas (discussion) – Closed as not promoted on 30 December 2021
William Hodgson (RAF officer) (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 26 December 2021
Supermarine Sea King (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 22 December 2021
Raymond Hesselyn (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 4 December 2021

Deletion

Timeline of Berlin Brandenburg Airport's construction (discussion) – Closed as delete and redirect on 30 December 2021
Evergreen International Airlines Flight 17 (discussion) – Closed as keep on 25 December 2021

Requested moves

Akbarpur (Ambedkar Nagar) Airstrip → Akbarpur Airstrip (discussion) – Closed as moved on 30 December 2021
1983 Avensa Douglas DC-9 crash → Avensa Flight 007 (discussion) – Closed as moved on 30 December 2021
Garuda Indonesia Flight 035 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 035 (discussion) – Withdrawn on 28 December 2021

Article Statistics
This data reflects values from DMY.

Aviation pages by quality
Quality
Quality	Total
FA	142
FL	15
A	56
GA	505
B	4,573
C	11,878
Start	15,082
Stub	18,754
List	2,539
Category	11,638
Disambig	653
File	2,713
Portal	629
Project	89
Redirect	1,518
Template	2,489
NA	66
Assessed	73,339
Unassessed	1
Total	73,340
WikiWork factors (?)		ω = 251,804	Ω = 4.92

New/Ongoing Discussions

Featured Article review

D. B. Cooper (discussion) – Since 14 December 2021

A-class Article assessment

Granville Gee Bee Model A (discussion) – Since 21 April 2020
List of aviation shootdowns and accidents during the Iraq War (discussion) – Since 22 February 2010

Good Article assessment

Romanian Air Corps (discussion) – Since 25 December 2021
Jean Batten (discussion) – Since 2 October 2021

Merger proposals

List of astronauts by name → List of astronauts by year of selection (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021
List of cosmonauts → List of space travelers by nationality (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021
List of space travelers by name → List of space travelers by nationality (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021
Holidays Czech Airlines → Czech Airlines (discussion) – Since 23 June 2021
Bendix Aviation → Bendix Corporation (discussion) – Since 30 May 2021
Airport Movement Area Safety System → Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (discussion) – Since 29 May 2021
ASDE-X → Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (discussion) – Since 28 May 2021

Splitting proposals

Family Airlines (discussion) – Since 23 November 2021
2021 Kabul airport attack (discussion) – Since 24 September 2021
List of military aircraft of the United States (discussion) – Since 16 August 2021
Braniff International Airways (discussion) – Since 8 September 2019

Deletion

List of maiden voyages (discussion) – Since 29 December 2021

Requested moves

Hot-air balloon → Hot air balloon (discussion) – Since 30 December 2021
Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela Flight 108 → Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela Flight 109 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021
Garuda Indonesia Flight 150 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 150 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021
Garuda Indonesia Flight 206 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 206 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021
Garuda Indonesia Flight 708 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 708 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021
Garuda Indonesia Flight 892 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 892 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021
TWA Flight 800 → TWA Flight 800 (1996) (discussion) – Since 27 December 2021
Dynamic Airways Flight 405 → Dynamic International Airways Flight 405 (discussion) – Since 26 December 2021
CommutAir Flight 4281 → CommutAir Flight 4821 (discussion) – Since 25 December 2021
Thai Airways → Thai Airways International (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021
Thai Airways fleet → Thai Airways International fleet (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021
List of Thai Airways destinations → List of Thai Airways International destinations (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021

Did you know

Ravish Malhotra (discussion) – Since 30 December 2021
Alexander Tahy (discussion) – Since 26 December 2021
Veronica Volkersz (discussion) – Since 6 December 2021
Rudolf Szepessy-Sokoll (discussion) – Since 3 December 2021

On The Main Page

Did you know...

... that the aerobatic demonstration aircraft used by SoloTürk is also used in military operations of the Turkish Air Force? (24 December)

Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list.
Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:COVID-19 vaccine mandate

Hello, Dede2008. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:COVID-19 vaccine mandate, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:COVID-19 vaccine mandate

Hello, Dede2008. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "COVID-19 vaccine mandate".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:00, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Sarah Azhari

I invite you to please join the discussion at Talk:Sarah Azhari.

Hello, we are seeking help with the Sarah Azhari article, created in 2013 & recently the subject of a deletion proposal. At issue was whether or not the Indonesian language sources establish notability. I am inviting you to the discussion at Talk:Sarah Azhari#Help with Indonesian language sources because you are in the Category:User id-N & have a minimum of 1,000 edits across all Wikimedia projects.

I realize that some of you are very busy while others may no longer be editing. Nevertheless, I thought it wise to consult with you.

Thank your for the work that you do on Wiki[mp]edia! Peaceray (talk) 21:06, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Solar eclipse of March 14, 1801 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Solar eclipse of March 14, 1801 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solar eclipse of March 14, 1801 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 16:19, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2023 Ratingen explosion

The article 2023 Ratingen explosion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Delete as per WP:NOTNEWS, no long-lasting coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:58, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Solar eclipse of September 26, 2117 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Solar eclipse of September 26, 2117 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solar eclipse of September 26, 2117 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Q 𝟤 𝟪 13:26, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Solar eclipse of February 11, 1804 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Solar eclipse of February 11, 1804 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solar eclipse of February 11, 1804 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Poxy4 (talk) 22:05, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Daher (Kuwait)

The article Daher (Kuwait) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is one sentence. Quick Google search doesn't show much notability or reliable sources on subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GoldRomean (talk) 17:19, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IP block exemption request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dede2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am writing to request an IP block exemption due to being currently unable to edit Wikipedia articles from my IP address range, which is hard blocked due to using Wikipedia for promotion or advertising purposes. I believe an exemption is necessary because I use a mobile hotspot on one of mobile provider in Indonesia, and when my IP address matches the range, I am unable to edit Wikipedia.

I understand and respect Wikipedia's policies on editing, including not to use IP block exemption on open proxy. Dede2008 (talk) 16:56, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You didn't provide the IP address so we can look into this. If you don't want to do so publicly, you may use WP:UTRS to provide it privately. 331dot (talk) 19:04, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Nico Schoof for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nico Schoof is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nico Schoof until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bearcat (talk) 16:16, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]