Having done my humble duty by ITN and MP/E, I'm off to immerse myself in the closing chapters of Simon Winder's Lotharingia, which I think you might find as intriguing and occasionally hilarious as I have. His running commentaries on medieval to 19th C. Europeans are glib and witty – sometimes rather too witty – and as history tomes go wildly entertaining. – Sca (talk) 16:19, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Martin, I literally don't know what to do about this and I am already sick of it before I've even started. I'd appreciate your advice, although, actually, my just throwing Teddy in the corner and stomping off with alcohol on my mind, then in it, also seems a strong and quite tempting option. Please, if you can be *rsed, have a quick look at these contribs and User talk:Lewys G where you will see a couple of people, including me, trying to reason with someone on what seems to me to be a slightly odd crusade. I don't want to take it to ANI where all the portents are that everything turns to sh*t quite fast, and the user is taking no notice of me – which is fair enough, why should they? I could perhaps talk to a specific admin if I could ID someone who might be interested, but equally I might do best just to walk away and let stuff happen. My user page, as you well know, is full of little (nauseating) cute bits telling me not to get involved. Indeed there is a nice (nauseating) paragraph on how every "helpful" user intervention I've ever tried here has turned to that same substance. Shall I just stfu and let nature take its course? Yes, I'm annoyed by the user's terrible (imho) edits but no-one will die as a direct result if every one of them stands for the next century ... gah! Cheers, and yours per my username, DBaK (talk) 19:39, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Knackered of Tunbridge Wells, ah yes, what an utter and extremely pointless waste of time (although, yes, that is a reasonably accurate summary of my own Wiki editing career). A real one-man crusade, it seems. There may be a case for mentioning the No.2 song denied a top place in notable instances. But unless there are (multiple) secondary sources that mention it, it's just useless trivia, as far as I can see. I will have a closer look later. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:55, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I salute your wisdom and kindness, thank you. It's just – argh! All that energy wasted. It is starting to attract other attention too, so I fear that I should probably just get a drink and watch it all go pear-shaped whilst regretting I that didn't do better! Cheers, and hic, from Tunbridge Wells (in spirit [both ways]) DBaK (talk) 20:04, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oh I was ill..very very ill. So ill I only have a vague memory of Christmas night to New year's eve. Strange delirium, dreams where I HAD to count to thirty seven, with a compelling narrative structure, which made this compulsion somehow important, a dream where I had to protect all rabbits, come what may. So I had a glorious virus, which put me in bed for six days. Temps of 100 plus. So I have been off line lately. Seriously appreciated your kind message though. Love you Martin. Si. Simon Adler (talk) 04:34, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
These are tough times, with all the war mongering. How do you think, it will go from here onwards ? War ? skirmish ? nothing extraordinary ? I saw the video yesterday, when I saw Suleimani's corpse pic. Quite gruesome, it was. --DBigXrayᗙ19:41, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you know, they fired 2 Hellfire missile each on both vehicles, just in case, one wasn't enough. Indeed, it was in bits and pieces, I think his ring in a severed hand and the purse was how they identified him. The purse had (among others) an Irani 100,000 Rial note, which I thought suits a general. I had to google it to find it has a value of 2.4$ only. I have no idea about Corbyn or his approach to the red button, so please enlighten me. Here we only hear about Boris. --DBigXrayᗙ19:57, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The electorate's "problem" with Jezza was that he made it clear he'd never use it. Of course the last real Labour PM we had probably would have just let Dabya use it for him. Mr Corbyn has a bicycle, has an allotment and makes damson jam. But he's not too keen on bagels. Allegedly. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:12, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I see, probably bad campaign managers did their damage. TBH, I was surprised Boris was re-elected. I was hoping Corbyn would have easily won considering he had Boris to defeat. Clearly I knew very little of the UK politics.--DBigXrayᗙ20:24, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Just here because you were prolific on the TS Eliot talk page & your good sense etc was noted! (Also, enjoyed chuckling at your userpage). Cheers! gobears87 (talk) 01:33, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm just back to say I saw that little note you put in a certain place and I had a very nice chuckle... always good to see you around but that was extra good. --gobears87 (talk) 05:58, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Something on a certain Very Negative Admin/Editor's talk page. You made a funny. They did not (unsurprisingly) respond. But I laughed out loud! --gobears87 (talk) 00:22, 23 February 2020 (UTC) p.s. any way to get notified about replies? no talkpages go on watchlist... :-/ ??[reply]
I'd hazard a guess that those surging tens of thousands, trying to get near the coffin, in Kerman, were not "frightened".
Initially, probably not – but wouldn't you think many became very frightened after people started getting trampled to death? I expect that's the way these things develop. Inserting human before stampede would have allayed most objections. Oh well.
(If only we could get that dopey darts blurb outta the ITN box. And moving south, doesn't Sheikh Mujibur Rahman look a lot like Marx?)
Having done my worst by WP, I can retreat into my current historical tome. It's largely about the Middle Ages, when humankind lived in perfect harmony. – Sca (talk) 18:55, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'd also hazard a guess that those who did get near the coffin were indeed frightened when being crushed to death. Maybe there was a lot of running. I don't really know. And maybe most of the world's press, who have reported it as "a stampede", don't really know either. Too bad my Persian isn't quite up to any analysis of semantic subtleties in the primary sources. But when I hear the word "stampede", for some reason I think of the Wild West and Bonanza. Ah yes, the Middle Ages, home comforts with a few foreign excursions. Lovely. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:16, 8 January 2020 (UTC) ... lol "I could dance with you till the cows come home. On second thoughts... "[reply]
A mate told me about this group and forward this to me. Crikey, I didn't know anyone (except me) did this stuff these days. I think they're just about notable for a WP article now, so I've stuck one up. Ritchie333(talk)(cont)16:58, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I say this in all seriousness, But if it wasn't for Giorgio Moroder, we would'nt have had A HA. Fine he also made disco respectable and layed the the drum pattern for Acid House[5], but my guilty pleasure off-shoot of 1970s elect innovation is late 80s electro pop; please don't tell anybody. PS hope xmass went well and thanks for the card. Ceoil (talk) 02:11, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, "Propiedad Prohibida" is very interesting, I do like open cords and drone. That avenue met its logical conclusion with Sunn O)))[7], a band that didn't release albums so much as meters/yards/feet of the same thing over and over, deliriously fantastic as it is. Ceoil (talk) 18:35, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
These people to me Martin are the 2010s equiv to White Noise[8] They sound like what Frank Zappa would have sounded like...if he had ever realised what he was aiming for. Anarchy in the USA. Ceoil (talk) 17:48, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I saw your edit summaries - yes, thats what happened. Coogan's impression[9] really took off on r/ireland, that man could run for president here, it was so close to the bone. Liz (wifey) is American and said as we were watching "Jasus yer man sounds exactly like ye". Ceoil (talk) 20:14, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm noticing that utube vids related to the 90s are now interrupted by ads for sight and hearing loss. The internet thinks I'm going to die. Ceoil (talk) 05:10, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Martin. Is any admin watching. Gudrun Pausewang (ITNN 23 Jan) was more or less ready yesterday, was marked "ready" before rehearsal, and is still not on the Main page. I was told there (also yesterday) "calm" but find it hard. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:02, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Martin, I noticed that you changed my spelling of "their next-door-neighbour" to the US spelling. Care to expand? All the best! Gareth 16:13, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Sorry there was no edit summary. I pressed publish too quickly and didn't get a chance to come back to it. I was reverting (I thought) the duplicated inclusion of 'FOOL, ICAO name for Léon-Mba International Airport' which is already under 'Other Uses' Robynthehode (talk) 20:59, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I kept checking Reuters to make sure this wasn't F-nooz, but apparently it actually happened in the world in which we live in. Stranger than the B-Report.– Sca (talk) 19:19, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, 93 years of age and what an amazing career. He's on Hub Cap, one of my favourite Freddie Hubbard albums (especially "Osie Mae", on which he takes the second solo, and which is just utterly wonderful). Martinevans123 (talk) 19:40, 20 January 2020 (UTC) ... The re-mastering of the classic 1960 The Thumper was so good it sounds like they're all in the room. Superb: brother Albert on drums[reply]
Wonderful music M. I always appreciate the links you leave and am amazed that youtube seems to have everything that was ever recorded on the planet :-) MarnetteD|Talk20:07, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, this main page should really be the article on the tune, not a dab page of zillions of albums named after it. Can you do whatever it is when you tag it and propose for it to be the main article on the tune and the rest moved to a dab?♦ Dr. Blofeld17:46, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Body and Soul is one of the most covered, popular songs of the 20th century!! I guess the younger generation don't know it very well, oh well. But when somebody says "The Avengers" I think the 60s TV series, and seeing the dab on Avenger look how far down the page it actually is. Times change and not always for the better!♦ Dr. Blofeld14:35, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your addition to Concorde has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 18:32, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for telling me (off again). Just to remind myself, here's the source I think I used, from The Times: [10]. And I believe I included that entire quote form Heseltine: "That is probably right. But if you have your hands tied behind your back and no cards and a very skilful negotiator on the other side of the table, led by a very experienced merchant banker, Kenneth Keith, I defy you to do any... " which I assumed wasn't under copyright to The Times. Perhaps it is? I must have thought the remaining material I added was necessary fr context and couldn't be written any other way to keep the exact sense. I'll have to try again sometime. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:11, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's okay to use the quote, but it's not okay to copy the surrounding prose unaltered. If you can't figure out a way to re-word it, leave it out.— Diannaa (talk) 22:50, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
So I tried again. If this is still judged, by you, to be an unacceptable a breach of copyright, could I possibly request that you tell me again and not block me as a persistent violator, as you have again threatened to do? Many thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 23:46, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sala was included as a player for the FA Cup match against Reading.[11] This seems odd, because Cardiff City is still arguing that Sala was not officially one of its players at the time of his death, and that it should not have to pay the £15 million fee.--♦IanMacM♦(talk to me)08:43, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, an odd situation. You'd have thought that any large business like that would have some kind of explicit rule for this in an employee's Ts&Cs. Sala certainly shouldn't have been included in any team list until he had signed his contract. If he had signed, the fee should have been paid. But it's not clear if he did? The article says: "Cardiff have argued that they shouldn't have to pay any of the fee as the Argentinian never signed the final version of his contract - a stance Nantes have strongly rejected." Even if that is the Daily Mail.Martinevans123 (talk) 09:12, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
A well written article from the WP:DAILYMAIL (which they are capable of doing), but will they ever live this down? As for Sala's status as a Cardiff City player and the £15 million fee, the lawyers are still arguing and the appeal is scheduled for "spring 2020... A final award is not expected before June 2020".[12] Watch this space.--♦IanMacM♦(talk to me)09:32, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It was so fun to see those folks again :-) Do either of you know if there is a list of Nessa's jobs somewhere on the interwebs. I know it wouldn't be allowed here at the 'pedia due to WP:TRIVIA concerns but it sure would be fun to have them all in one place. I hope both have a crackin week. MarnetteD|Talk20:22, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sure it doesn't, sofixit. I have enough German hymns to handle, some with 15 stanzas, - same mindset, it seems. The poet said "let's search for joy" to his wife, after most of their children had died in the Thirty Years War. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:03, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there. I left the Google search information in the ref so the link would go directly to the firing, but I won't contest your trim, not being sure about the formatting. I'll see if I can access the book directly for a better ref. I see you have expressed concerns in your edit summary about Roger Nichols' firing meriting a subsection. Nichols' importance to the band is self-evident. The firing was not public record until 2018 when Brian Sweet updated his book on the band. I expect more information to surface about this termination, if indeed it does not already exist. Cheers! Jusdafax (talk) 21:54, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nichols' importance is indeed beyond doubt. I guess I just don't like one one-sentence sub-sub-sections. I wasn't sure why it wasn't just the second paragraph of the preceding sub-section, where it fits chronologically. With your permission I'll format the ref anyway. The link should still go directly to page 445. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:00, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your thoughts on Seamus. I don't think it matters at all, as it seems to be a matter or a few 100 metres one way or the other. A linked mention is best, as you say. I'll leave it with you if you feel strongly. Merry Imbolc for yesterday; festival of snowdrops and the triple goddess. (I don't know much about image policies). x Anna (talk)13:09, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Anna for that lovely picture. I don't have strong views on that, just seeking to avoid redlinks in the infobox. Surprised that I'm unable to find an image on Mossbawn on the net. It was featured in that BBC television documentary last year: [13] His brother Hugh is still there, I think, with his chickens. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:22, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I can tell Mossbawn is the farmhouse or tiny hamlet around it. I love that link you posted of Seamus talking about the town and the farm. I do miss him still. I saw him read many times, getting progressively more frail and shaky in his last years; bent and palsied. Such a gentle man, full of grace. His memorial at the Southbank was a beautiful event, full of friends, his and mine. Not a dry eye in the house. Many friends of mine have encouraging letters that he sent to them as budding poets - he seemed to always reply to personal letters. Such a power house for education in the UK and Ireland; Ted Hughes too - they were great personal friends. x Anna (talk)13:58, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the farmhouse. Is that it? I found that image, but it seemed untitled. I had thought it was a more substantial place. It can be seen in the documentary at about 5:10 - it's No 126, Hillhead Road (you can see it on Google Streetview). Martinevans123 (talk) 14:01, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
...at the Sanna Marin article, where I began citation checking after a student reported finding discrepancies between sentences and their appended citations. I have corrected what I have found, but was only able to do so by further citing her self-published autobiographies. (The title subject has at least three of these that are cited, and all—in this professional's experience—were written by her, and then posted by the various venues.) In truth, the article has about 25% self-published material, and if the early research we did is representative, there will be a lot further correcting required before it can move to being a GA. Cheers, will keep looking in, but wanted to let another involved editor what was going on there. [a former prof.] 2601:246:C700:19D:21CA:6537:9D1B:A204 (talk) 19:19, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the invite. I'm not sure the "self-published autobiographies" are much of a problem, if it's non-controversial material. Might even be expected to be more accurate than some newspaper reports. Also don't see what's wrong with a second image of her. After all, she is a politician, not an academic. Although, as User:Bus stop would no doubt tell youwill definitely not tell you (as they not maintain any dogmatic position on action shots versus non-action shots), an "action shot" is probably better, if available. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:00, 4 February 2020 (UTC) p.s. may be some way before it gets nominated for WP:GA[reply]
I basically consider all things, including intangible factors, in preferring one image over another. I don't take some kind of a dogmatic approach that I have decided upon in some earlier decision-making process. I might have spoken about "action shots" but that was in relation to weighing one image against one or more other images. Thank you for pinging me. Bus stop (talk) 22:14, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The thing is there has been no preference expressed by me for the "action shot". I can chose to favor one photo over another because one shows "action" and the other shows passivity in a given instance. You say "as User:Bus stop would no doubt tell you, an 'action shot' is probably better". I appreciate being pinged and having this opportunity to say that in fact I do not maintain any dogmatic position on action shots versus non-action shots. Such a distinction is merely an argument I made relating to choice of or placement of an image in one specific instance. Thanks for this opportunity. Bus stop (talk) 17:24, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for clarifying, so clearly, what you can chose to favour, in terms of one photograph over another. I have now duly adjusted my comment above, in line with your very clear explanation. I trust my earlier misrepresentationmisunderstanding based on a logical deduction from what you said, of your position on photo comparisons will not negatively impact your future at Wikipedia, or indeed affect your personal credit rating. I would also like to take this opportunity apologise to 2601:246:C700:19D:21CA:6537:9D1B:A204 for any confusion caused about your preferences in the selection of photographs for articles. Furthermore, I'm sure there any many popular hair styles, available in very many parts Scandinavia, that do not involve braids, whether visible in photographic "action shots" or not. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:50, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for clarifying, so clearly, my earlier misunderstanding in my interpretation of your remarks. I have now duly adjusted my comment above, in line with your very clear explanation. Perhaps there is counselling available, through the right channels, if you feel this episode has left you or your hair traumatised or damaged. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:18, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The pigtail phenomena is somewhat undefined. The significance of pigtails is not known in a general sense. This is similar to the conundrum that sometimes arises concerning images for ledes of articles. Generalizations about images are valid up to a point. But beyond that point they are "over-generalizations". Bus stop (talk) 19:48, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I would not want to suggest for one moment that the significance of pigtails is known in a general sense or that the pigtail phenomena is well defined. Perhaps someone should look at the lead images in the articles of all people who are known to wear, or have ever worn pigtails, and see if there is an effect. I'm not even sure if Sanna Marin is a candidate. (Notwithstanding the likelihood that we will never obtain a copyright-compliant image of her wearing this hair style). I can confirm that, to the best of my knowledge Yul Brynner never wore pigtails. Nor did Friedrich Engels. To name but two. But then they weren't from Scandinavia. I guess we can rule out payot, even though they don't involve real pigs, of course. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:03, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello - as someone who has conducted discussions in a polite and civil way regarding the article 'Death of Harry Dunn' may I note my appreciation given the toxic behaviour of others (please see [14])--SnowyMalone (talk) 19:15, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That's a shame. A bit of a misunderstanding, it seems. I hope you two can sort it out. I see you have only just started as a registered editor, after a bit if IP editing. So well done for doing that, and I wish you well. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:27, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I can not begin to imagine what generated the aggression of that contributor. Am considering whether or not to continue on Wikipedia as I have no interest in engaging with such people.--SnowyMalone (talk) 19:53, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
(watching:) everytime you read "toxic" here, remember that it says much more about the one who uses it than anything else. Please stay, and Martin's page is a great refuge ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:43, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Today, we have the kiss of brutalist and peace, so to speak. - Deaths: 4 deaths to deal with in 2 days, that was hard. SnowyMalone, want to help? Look in Deaths in 2020 for a name that interests you in the top section - everything below can get stressful - see if it's good (everything cited, not too short, decent prose) of if not if you can make it so, and then go to WP:ITNN and nominate for the Main page. You'll see my name there more than I like. Today Mirella Freni, was like this. Don't miss the video. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:06, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Martin, hello Gerda - thank you for the supportive comments, which are greatly appreciated ... and Martin's 'toxic' links added some valuable levity. Whilst being conscious of not wishing to dwell on the toxicity, you may note that the individual has recently responded on my Talk page to comments from another contributor ([15]) but continues with his claims that it was me who was being confrontational, doesn't recognise his toxic behaviour (he just weasely notes 'If you feel I was biting..') and doesn't even communicate to me. I've removed these comments from him and will not engage with him further. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SnowyMalone (talk • contribs) 11:45, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well, your own Talk page is usually largely to do with as you please. But yes editors do often start to converse. Personally, I might have been tempted to keep that apology. Martinevans123 (talk) 11:51, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps I'd have kept if an apology was made to me. Anyway, I see no value in further communication with him .. far more preferable is with constructive individuals (you, Gerda and a few others inc. ones who popped up on my Talk page) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SnowyMalone (talk • contribs) 11:56, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. Yes. some useful advice there. I sometimes wish that, as an "encyclopedia" there should be some moratorium on adding any news the same day it's published. It's quite ironic that I started editing here with a keen interest in historical topics. But the past 13 years have seen me demonstrate a steady slide towards In the News and other such sleb goss trash! Martinevans123 (talk)
Welcome excuse to get away from the thread header. - Lately, I became one of those "latest news" editors, did you know? Two recent deaths (RD) 2 days ago, together, two today, together. All deserving, imho, a conductor, a Holocaust survivor, an actor (whom everybody seems to know for the transsexual role), a soprano. 2 of the 4 I knew by name, 1 of those I saw, conducting. Should I have left the other 2 to their misery, and thus not being exposed. - On the Main page now a Cassandra's work, translated as Fall-Out. The author was also in the RD section. - Older news; it's interesting to observe that when you are called disruptive you often think the other one is, no? - On my talk page, I delete or shorten bot messages, nothing else. What I do when I don't like something is archive fast ;) - SnowyMalone, please sign your posts on talk pages. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:40, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Gerda, yes, people keep dying. And many deserve to be remembered. You seem to be able to successfully combine useful ITN/RD updates with more in-depth creation of important musical topics. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:15, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oh dear. That doesn't seem quite right. I'd have thought a German book deserved a German title. Your trouble reminds me of that great English play Verlorene Liebesmüh. I think the guy was called Wilhelm Speer-Schüttle, or something like that? "These Krauts, comin' over ere, nickin' our jokes...." Martinevans123 (talk) 21:17, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No, I'm a little baffled. I'm not sure why that section has suddenly become such a problem in terms of "relevance and importance" just now. The new material was added two days ago and has been discussed extensively since. Martinevans123 (talk) 23:12, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Martin - as I noted to him on the Talk page, his recent actions are suggestive of being peevish after others disagreed with his views when discussed on the Talk page (these about 'admitted' and the inclusion of the 'Is she CIA' text). Of course, do not know if this explanation is true, but what else is there ... desperate attempt at another reason to support his 'view'??? --SnowyMalone (talk) 23:18, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure. Seems to be in a minority position on those two points at the moment. And I'm pretty sure "said" and "stated" aren't the only permissible variant words for that article. Martinevans123 (talk) 23:24, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Martin - I suspect there are very few who would disagree. The reason for this one person's disagreement remains unclear, although their behaviour on this subject and previous on the same Talk page are consistent with trolling, and specifically a mix of a 'Why Is This News Troll', a 'Broken Record Troll' and an 'Affected Profundity Troll'.--SnowyMalone (talk) 14:19, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
One can only assume that DeFacto doesn't waste his time looking at my Talk page. But in case he does, I'd just like to say we are very fortunate to have such a sincere and able editor there who is so well-versed in Wikipedia's guidelines and policies.Martinevans123 (talk) 16:22, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, "leaves on the line" has become a standard meme-type joke across the UK for "feeble excuse for not providing a basic level of service." But I think it's great they're now busy chopping down all the trees between London and Birmingham. 17:50, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Who needs 'em? – all they do is produce oxygen. BTW, over here we do have railroads lined by trees and other living things. – Sca (talk) 18:04, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Today: Passio, in love with passion, Passion and Pärt. (I actually heard the performance in that church, DYK?) Further below: we'll sing his deer's cry (again), and a great new O salutaris hostia (not by him), and about the secrets, - a funeral tomorrow. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:38, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Pictured church packed, and good conversations, with people I rarely see. I didn't know the song they played, and de-tagged the article. Everybody sems to know it. Moving history, now in some references. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:00, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, I'm not sure if this is your intention or not and if you purposefully do this or not, but it feels like you are filibustering by blocking any compromise edits we were working on. Instead of working together and making an edit which shared both our views, it feels like you've distracted the discussion away with talks about indenting, bad faith negotiating, and an overall non-cooperative attitude. Instead of worrying about my semicolons in front of my comments we should focus on the content at hand. That includes the topic of us making some great progress I was proud for us to almost have until it felt like you backed out on your end. This upsets me, I thought we could both be heard in the article but I get the feeling that you aren't being a team player. What else do you need for us to continue? 194.247.60.2 (talk) 07:52, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello IP 194. I’m very sorry if you feel I have done any of those things deliberately. I am guessing that you are referring to LGBT rights in the United Arab Emirates, although it’s hard to know for sure without any diffs. Since I last edited that article, on 29 January 2020, there has been a whole series of edits, back and forth, by a number of different editors, not me. The article has now been protected by User:El C with this edit summary: “Persistent disruptive editing: pending changes not working as intended”. So I may not be the best person to complain to. By the way, is there any reason why you can’t register as an editor? You might find your efforts more positively received. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 09:48, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Martinevans123, I'm sorry that I forgot to add the edit summary(actually for three times).I thought Wales is not a nationality,and some anonymous users who also didn't add the edit summary changed his nationality into Wales. So, I think I was wrong. It'll be OK if I enter the edit summary? Thank you. If you enter Wales, it'll show the flag, so... Awaiting your quick response. Aziraphale yu (talk) 18:32, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Aziraphale yu. Thanks for your note. Don't worry, it's easy to forget stuff when you are a new editor. Just try and remember to use edit summaries in future. Yes, I'm sure the flag looks great! But we don't use them in that field in infoboxes. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:17, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Sorry but your last edit on the Halifax page makes no sense from a prose point of view; "It had ben revealed that been shocked at the revelation that violent crime in the city centre had risen". May need a rewrite? Thanks and regards. The joy of all things (talk) 12:22, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks for telling me. Not sure how that happened. It should make some sense now, although whether it belongs in the "Culture" section, or indeed whether is too out of date to be included, are valid questions. What is your view? Martinevans123 (talk) 12:27, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure he gets his due, man was still in his 30s and at a peak.[18] I well remember, aged 12, thinking he was cool as f*** at live aid, with his quiff, two mikes, tasty birds, and what have you. I'm a straight white man, but Brian Ferry is and was always: hmm. Ceoil (talk) 21:38, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm auld black hooded Irish Queen in many ways Martin, but to say, ah Virginia Plain; c 1984 it was one of the first times I realised what music could do. The original Top of the Pops[19] performance is a stone classic. There Brian Eno was creaking out (flash Gordon type) sounds it took me decades to figure out...until I came to appreciate the BBC workshop. Ceoil (talk) 22:05, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Imagine my dissapointed that you are not actually all knowing after all (joking: in seriousness I have learned a huge amount from your talk page). Re Wetherall or acid house in general, skip to 26:36. Dont like the long hair dude at the start, but the rest of it is great and may give incite into this period of dance culture. Ceoil (talk) 01:27, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Its the internet so nobody is reading, but Moring comes is the best song on that album - what lovely harmonics. That said, by temperament, I'm more of a Ambulance blues man myself; Rusty Kershaw's parts are mind blowingly dark. Ceoil (talk) 10:38, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yup and I understand they were smoking very heavy skunk in 73-74, and Young, who is not an easy man to get on with, was coming up with lines like "Its easy to get buried in the past,...when you try and make a good thing last". Almost enough for a man to go deep, deep on the harmonica. Ceoil (talk) 10:38, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, yes. "I still can't remember when, Or how I lost my way." Martinevans123 (talk) 10:51, 7 March 2020 (UTC) .... a mere 7 mins 29, it could easily go on twice as long (and, I guess, often did in concert)[reply]
Speaking of Richard Thompson, back when we all had tapes, I had an even more spine chilling live version of [23], which is lost to me now. They are often compared, but not sure Sinead O'Connor has the same emotional range. Ceoil (talk) 11:24, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That sounds good. Sharing a house as a student, I had the room at the top and the only one that had access to a very suspect-looking rickety old fire-escape (that none of us ever felt brave enough to climb). The room window was ill-secured. I returned from a weekend away, late one Sunday night, to discover that my collection of over thirty C90s and C120s (most of which were full of rare Peel Sessions and Fluff Freeman Saturday Rockshow tracks (that I had illegally taped off the radio) had all been stolen. Wow, that was a bit annoying. Was it any coincidence that, over that weekend, the other housemates had been visited by the landlord and his two teenage sons? I'll never know. But I'm still annoyed, all these decades later. Martinevans123 (talk) 11:41, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sound like you needed to get medieval on their asses. Re peel....our equivalent at the time was Dave Fanning, but apart from U2 or The Frames, he never broke anything as significant as the definitive version of The Fall's "Jerusalem". ps, re the frames [[24]Ceoil (talk) 11:51, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That's a nice track. Peel's stuff has now become more available, so the pain has subsided somewhat. But it was other first plays of unknown stuff, and older stuff from Fluff, that hurt for many years, lol. It was more the hours I had spent, even though it was all "illegal", of course. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:05, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I also have hundreds of hours of stuff on tape, "illegal" stolen from radio, and now all valueless contraband in cardboard in my attic. Mostly Queen, Fall, Wedding Present, acid house. Ceoil (talk) 12:12, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
that's what I feel I am, - really great to live close to one of the best operas in the world. She was extraordinary again! Another Barrie Kosky production, - they solved the question spoken dialogue vs. the later composed recitatives by a third way: narration in French by a female voice, from the novella on which it is based. It worked. Carmen rose in the end, and shrugged ;) 12 pics --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:37, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
...with your edit at Roger Deakins, but did not have the boldness to do that. You might—for sake of its longevity, revert it temporarily, and return it later... because I expect my much larger editing will trigger some strong, possibly revertive responses, responses wherein your contribution might get lost. (All, here, are not as accepting and nice as RD.) Cheers. 2601:246:C700:19D:EDF4:ADF1:A260:BF0F (talk) 22:21, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Evening Martin - Is Reflinks working for you at the moment? For me, it won't let me connect to Wikipedia. With ReFill on the blink again, I'm completely stymied. If it is, could you run the tool over the above article. The look of the refs. is driving me mad! Many thanks. KJP1 (talk) 17:40, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi KJP. Well, just worked fine for me over at Llantilio Crossenny. But this one says:
Yes, I saw you'd used it at Llantilio (I Love Hen Gwrt!) and wondered if it was me, or the page. It won't let me Connect, telling me there's a problem in a python script - whatever the hell that is! How very odd and frustrating. KJP1 (talk) 17:58, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In view of the not-quite-a-pandemic-yet, I'm having a PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) installed in my left arm, so I can receive coffee intravenously. If that doesn't work, I may have to take more drastic steps. – Sca (talk) 18:48, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
So I have a "racial slur history" for using certain words. You can just trawl back through my edit history and hand-pick those bad words context free? It's not as if they were used as part of conversations, between engaged parties. You think I have used those words just to deliberately offend people, and not perhaps in weak attempts at jokes (however misguided, or "missing a mark" judged by later observers)? You don't think that the piped link I used to 2020 coronavirus outbreak on cruise ships#Grand_Princess wasn't the point I was trying to make... the point that it's possible to see world pandemics in a racially intolerant way, e.g. to blame the Chinese for deliberately trying to bring down Western economies in some kind of evil world domination plan? You know, if you were really offended by that C-word, or feared that any Chinese friends might be similarly offended, you could have just asked me to remove it, instead of opening your AN/I thread? You could still do that now. Which do you think might be the most effective way of avoiding any possible offense? But if you are determined to characterise me as a hateful racial bigot, I'm not sure I can really stop you. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 07:56, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
p.p.s. perhaps a more obvious link would have been to this: "Darned Chinks" (and, yes, the Brit version would have been "Ruddy Chinkies"). That was the general point I was trying to make. But maybe I would have then been set upon by Trump supporters? By all means feel free to trace my "Trump link history." Martinevans123 (talk) 10:40, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
not in the mood, sorry, missing DBigXray among too many others, I have a composer on the Main page whose article was a complete copyvio (unless a publisher copied from here which is also possible) until I looked today, + a family member was born in Wuhan, DYK? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:33, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The text he set most astonishingly translates to: "hostile armies press". - All sources say he IS professor, but looks like he silently retired. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:14, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I really like the film 7 Faces of Dr. Lao but it hasn't been shown on television for years because it is considered to contain a velly stereotyped depiction of a Chinese man by Tony Randall. The Irish Mirror article here has used "ch**k" because the full version is often considered unacceptable nowadays.--♦IanMacM♦(talk to me)12:57, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Martin, I realise it is quite out of character for me to be serious on your talk page, but the best way to end this is to say something like "It was a bit of lighthearted humour directed at another user who would take it in good spirit. It was never intended to directly antagonise and I apologise if anyone took offence."Ritchie333(talk)(cont)13:02, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, extremely out of character. Thanks for your very sensible advice. I'd be more than happy to add exactly that and to risk the further accusation of just toeing the line at an Admin's bidding. But that explanation is 100% accurate. I'm just amazed at the number of "disgusting racial abuse" comments that have sprung up. I hope I have made my intentions, however misguided, clear above. But perhaps intentions and context count for nothing these days. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:32, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Seems I got there just in time (?) Didn't realise there was an unseen clock running. It's not nice to be labelled as a racist bigot, is it. But at least I'm not Welsh, eh? oh, hang on..... Martinevans123 (talk) 14:02, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure it's yet a requirement for AN/I participants to give any indication of racial origin. But one is prompted to ask "Can Blue Men Sing the Whites"? I was told, in no uncertain terms, after my first and only contribution to that thread, after your kind and sensible advice, to "stop digging". (And that came after Grapple X had told everyone to "Call a spade a spade"). Martinevans123 (talk) 15:10, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Most likely it would be under WP:NPA, WP:EQ, or WP:IUC. Personally I do not see it as something to take action against given the situation and response. Thats coming from someone that has been called a chink for racist reasons even though I am Korean. PackMecEng (talk) 20:06, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I can lie. But usually choose not to, in preference to the awkward truth. Thanks for telling me, you must try some of this when you can. But seriously .... that Kim guy? Hasn't even got a proper Hitler moustache. And don't get me started on those Northern "Gogs", either.... (pre-emptive apologies to cheeses everywhere). Wheeltappers and Shunters123 (talk) 23:24, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
When Ivanvector closed the Racial slurs topic here, it said that "Martinevans123 (talk · contribs) is formally warned that future incidents of using racial slurs as humour will be met by very funny indefinite blocks."
I am guessing they got busy with something else, because I didn't see this posted here, so here you go... just so we're all on the same page. I think it's entirely likely that this is light-hearted banter to you, but "racial slurs are offensive. You might have innocent alternate uses for them, but they're still offensive to broad populations of people, as well as to people who don't see the humour in putting people down."
Thank you Carole, that's very courteous of you. Unfortunately, it seems we've been very much on two separate pages. I guess Ivan was too busy throwing away my apology. "Light-hearted banter?" I guess that depends on who one thinks one is bantering with. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:21, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That makes me feel better about your intention. I hope that there's a part of you that takes a beat or two before speaking / typing. Who needs this craziness (so many people upset) in one's life?–CaroleHenson (talk) 20:28, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Offence is not given, it is taken. You can't apologise for something that wasn't given, and you can't apologise on behalf of someone who has taken offence at something that wasn't intended. So an apology just doesn't work in this scenario. If you did apologise for the sake of appeasing someone who has taken offence at something that you didn't intend, you'd end up apologising on behalf of them for their actions, and that is offensive. You couldn't make it up. CassiantoTalk20:43, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I guess eventually the word kowtow will be deemed a racist insult. Regrettable that what was intended to be a comment on US public health policy, to another like-minded editor, with no intended racial connotations, means that I've now been painted as a racist who enjoys insulting all Chinese people. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:29, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Only US citizens with pre-booked flights need apply
For light entertainment, here's an extract from the website www.whitehouse.gov:
Q Mr. President, have you been briefed that up to 100 million Americans would ultimately be exposed to the virus?
THE PRESIDENT: I’ve been briefed on every contingency you can possibly imagine. Many contingencies. A lot of —
Q But that number.
THE PRESIDENT: — a lot of positive. Different numbers. All different numbers. Very large numbers. And some small numbers too, by the way.
Look, right now, I guess we’re at 26 deaths, and if you look at the flu — the flu, for this year — we’re at 8 mil- — we’re looking at 8,000 deaths. And, you know, hundreds of thousands of cases, but we have 8,000 deaths. So you have 8,000 versus 26 deaths, at this time.
With all of that being said, we’re taking this unbelievably seriously, and I think we’re doing a really good job. And, again, the task force, headed up by the Vice President, has been fantastic.
Martin - please, just drop it. I understand you feel sore, and nobody who knows you, or doesn’t have an axe to grind, thinks you meant the initial comment to be offensive. But continuing to argue the point on other editors’ talk pages will just prolong it and won’t be productive. Now, I’ve got a Featured list up that you may be interested in. Or not! All the best. KJP1 (talk) 21:43, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the advice, KJP1. And for the kind invitation. I'm surprised by your rather stern tone, which I'm not used to. My brief discussion with Slatersteven was quite productive. That with Praxidicae somewhat less so. I've tried to explain the intention and context around that throw-away misplaced joke comment, involving a old-fashioned five-letter pantomime word. I offered to User:Kees08 to remove the comment. I agreed with Ritchie to offer an apology. But it seems I arrived at AN/I three minutes too late and my apology was swiftly thrown away. Meanwhile, I have Carole comparing my comments to a "recent incident on a subway train when a person of Asian descent was sprayed." Perhaps you have also been wrongly accused of being a racist. In which case you may know how sore that feeling is. I'm really not sure where this "list of forbidden words" is going at Wikipedia. Your contributions are always so well thought-out and elegant. Your sources are always well selected. I'm sure you deserve all the FA articles you propose! Martinevans123 (talk) 22:17, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Martin - I'm sorry. I didn't mean to come across as stern. Another instance of the limitations of this medium! And you're right; I do have form in this space, albeit tangential. Over the last few months, I've seen some good friends walk away, hopefully temporarily, when issues escalated, and I didn't want to see it happen again. All the best. KJP1 (talk) 07:30, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Having had the pleasure of a sit down and pint with KJP1 a couple of years ago, I can assure you Martin that he is a gentleman and the last person to be all stern like. Its the like of me you need to watch out for. Ceoil (talk) 20:33, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You're so not a racist. Anyone who claims otherwise has a very superficial and, frankly, inoperable concept of racism. If you can manage to censor yourself from posting what some predictably will call out as [X]-ist, all the better, if not, we'll just be back here again, explaining that even a bot could have done a better job at determining whether you are [X]-ist or not. ---Sluzzelintalk22:43, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm finding it hard to come up with music with weight equal to the moment. This best reflects the mood, maybe, as in society is far more fragile than we thought. Obv I am not a, since aged 10, a christian, but there is insight in centuries old hand to mouth basic truths. [31]. Ceoil (talk) 21:55, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The oh so gentle Spanish guitar versus a rather shrill voice dont really do it for me frankly, but I take your point. My main concern here is that youvebarely edited since the above; we need and like having you you here man. Ceoil (talk) 16:28, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've enjoyed our absurdly obtuse conversations on several levels, especially when one of your British references flies over my head. It was one hell of a country you apparently had in your day! Thanks for sharing your memories with this impressionable dumb Canuck, and if you have one last deep cut pun for the road, this train leaves at midnight (UTC, for some reason). InedibleHulk (talk) 03:07, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Working on their article, with was pure promotional copyvio. I have tickets for them for end of June, - only: will they be able to come, and we to get together? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:51, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
A long time ago, I recommended our village watch out for sewing machines and spinning wheels. Well, the deal in the sky kept on turning, and so the full moon aligns with 28 days later. So now the important thing is remaining vigilant against rabid mutant werewolves. I know that sounds ridiculous, but so did washing my hands a month ago. Together, our pack *can* survive till the waning hours, but divided we just might! That said, now is still not the time to prick our fingers; septicemia is still Goodnight Irene, too, nevermind the novel Bloodhounds of the Amityvilles (it's not on shelves till the Harvest Moon, anyway). InedibleHulk (talk) 01:32, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Seriousy though, your first DYK in your 2013 archive strongly suggests you were tangled in the same yarn all along, just blissfully unaware, so welcome aboard. Who names their kid "Benjamin Britten"? Honestly! InedibleHulk (talk) 11:00, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, "A Boy Was Born" "A Boy was Born". Not first chronologically, I suppose, but first a new reader sees. And a British boy, no less. Maybe it's nothing, maybe I'm looking too hard, it's happened before. I should probably listen to that song. Sorry for jumping to (vague) conclusions! InedibleHulk (talk) 23:45, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oddly (or appropriately) enough, I also struggled deeply with that decision. Seems I chose poorly. But it's not too late to right great wrongs! InedibleHulk (talk) 21:51, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hensel? No, that doesn't seem right at all. Then again, my memories of classical music (and Germany) are mainly based on Looney Tunes or Merrie Melodies. If you think that's a Fanny hill worth killing on, all the power to you! But maiden names aren't exactly grammar, and I'm more a Grammar Nazi than a genealogist. The valkyrie, thee! InedibleHulk (talk) 22:47, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Gerda. Now listened to the Festival Casals 2017 upload. Very rich. I'm not sure abut Fanny (takes off at about 1:50), as they say, If she called herself Fanny Hensel, then maybe that's what the article should be called. Martinevans123 (talk) 11:35, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to join the discussion. I said the same, but that's no argument, as long as we have Wolfgang Amadeus, who never called himself that way. I have been called potentially intimidating, so unwatched. Please report of the outcome when it happens. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:43, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
... one Martin died, cellist, listen to interview a bit, - when he said that he was the last person alive to have worked with Benjamin Britten I almost cried - what a life! - no voces8 here this year, as had to be expected --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:38, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, yes. I did not know that BB composed his last ever piece for the Amadeus. Martinevans123 (talk)
Nor did I - that's really great learning in this project, - and then that last piece got an infobox, and his other quartets, and those by Beethoven that didn't have one (but all the late ones had it) ;) - Did you know that we have no decent Beethoven portrait from around 1808? 1803, and then again 1815. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:32, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Donno – early 2000s somewhere? Larry Campbell makes this one. He and Charlie Sexton have done a lot for the master of metaphor: "That big fat moon is gonna shine like a [https:// owlcation.com/humanities/Spooning-A-Welsh-Tradition spoon"]. – Sca (talk) 15:19, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speaking of Ska, and knowing that Bristol is practically in Wales, never knew this existed until about an hour ago:
As a fan of this song from possibly my favourite year in music, but not much of a fan of Ryan's moderate dancing skills in the video, I was very pleased to come across the choreographed routine you linked in this diff some years ago. A good find! Best, Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!)21:02, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the advice. I saw your comment at Talk:Malaysia Airlines Flight 17: "They have been blocked, so we can drop this now." and assumed they were indefinitely blocked wholesale. Then reading the notice at their talk page, I assumed they were just blocked from the article or, if they were also blocked from the Talk page, were already unable to respond. But a TBAN just relies on the editor's compliance, doesn't it. There's no preventing mechanism? Martinevans123 (talk) 11:27, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, it would be unhelpful to talk through edit summaries so thought of leaving a note here. Yes, Lowry became an RA member in 1962, but his first retrospective at the RA was only in 1976, after his death. I added it in the lead to provide some context, as otherwise the line about naive Sunday painter is just left hanging, without any resolution or giving the readers a complete idea that the view was revised, and even the establishment celebrated him later on (alas, he didn't live to see it). So, please do consider reinserting it. I enjoyed read his biography last year (by Rohde), but I've forgotten a lot of stuff. I think the article could become a lot better, particularly on his middle life/work. I'll see if I can dig out the sources and refresh my knowledge. It would be great to see this in a much better shape, and to do justice to one of the most important 20th century British artists (and a personal favourite) Thanks TerentiusNew (talk) 18:43, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks for your note, TerentiusNew. Apologies if my edit summary was a bit cryptic. I think your addition was spot on. Just needs a source. I wonder is that Rohde book available online? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:03, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it's available online, the only way to read some of it might be through snippets on Google Books here. I happen to have that and the TG Rosenthal. No worries about your crypticity (a word I just learnt to use right here! :P) , I'll ensure all my edits are referenced now.. TerentiusNew (talk) 11:25, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think I'm some how going to ever think this band is not contemptible, or play along with a jokey reference, even during a global pandemic in which we might all die and thus Mick Hucknoll's dreadful hair and whiney voice will be moot, you have another thing coming buddy. Ceoil (talk) 22:07, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I was deep deep into them c 1987, esp Radio-activity and Computer World era, and Thomas Dolbey (thanks Thomas for Prefab Sprout), so was ripe for the pickings when Acid House came along. Did you ever get into Kraftwerk's early Can phase; the two albums arnt very good, but their are some great live performances. Jams like Can performances, so every second or third 20 minutes is magical. Ceoil (talk) 19:58, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Never knew that even existed, it doesn't appear on many discographies? Meanwhile can I interest you in this [36], which to me, unintentionally blends beefheart and Martin Hannett, almost like The Invisible Girls, but before! I heard this song in 1988 at a party, but it is so obscure it too 25 years, ie youtube to bring us together again. Its as good as I remember. Meanwhile they were silently alone for setting set the scene for most of bands ex cork since the late 80s. Go figure. Ceoil (talk) 00:02, 9 May 2020 (UTC)tt[reply]
Yes, jesus. Re Alter Images, the melody for the lines before "I could be happy" remind strongly of a line used by another 80s band that I cant put my finder on, that were prob after, given my age. And when I say "remind", I mean exactly the same, ie was lifted directly. Tears for Fears, Prefab Sprout, or something like that. Ceoil (talk) 22:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Haslett and Bryant misinterpreted the evidence, reading signs of a tsunami where there were none. Horsburgh and Horritt comprehensively debunked their theorising in the paper published in Weather. We shouldn't mislead readers into thinking there are two competing theories.----Pontificalibus07:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Pontificalibus. Thanks for your note. Yes, Haslett and Bryant did take quite a risk there. The word "evidence" was a bit too strong I think. I'm not really advocating misleading readers in any way. I'd suggest that Horsburgh, K.J. and M. Horritt (2006) should be used as a source at the end of the paragraph. Martinevans123 (talk) 07:53, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I had a feeling some of what I originally wrote might not have been clear, so thanks for casting another pairs of eyes over it.--08:26, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for sharing. Reminds me of my friend, conductor, she had to do a Beethoven men's chorus for Rilling at a workshop in Oregon, a piece she found a bit boring, and the singers found boring, so she dressed in bright red ;) - A little video contrib for mother's day was passed to me, and I placed it below the May flowers. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:15, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It was some drinking song with banal text. Anybody watching: Monteverdi's birthday coming soon, and I want to have his vespers as good as possible. Improvements and comments welcome. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:27, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
ITN: did you see the stats for an article to which I added a few refs, and said not to crop off the lion's paws in the lead image? - Gives the nice feeling of having served readers ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:30, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I understood your reasoning. But I think it's somewhat flawed. You think that everyone who has a physics degree is "a scientist"? I explained at Talk:Elon Muskhere: "If you want to describe Musk as a "scientist" you need to provide a reliable source that uses that word. It's a simple as that. Although using just one single source might be pushing it." Do you now understand that advice? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 06:39, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
well, still too lazy for the June pic: look ... for another Estonian composer, pictured the house where I met AP, below the flowers, and a great soprano who died. Planning to upload a pic of our almost empty Pentecostal church, what a difference to this, and to a crowd of 1000 gathering open air on Pentecost Monday 2000, when two choirs sang the 8-part Mendelssohn Psalm 100. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:37, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The Boz Scaggs article looks like a car crash waiting to happen. Would appreciate if you could fix the tone. Least we forget this is why he matters[39]: The Voice and that amazing bass lick. Ceoil (talk) 00:38, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I like people who don't matter - people like Tracey (can't lick bass but looks great in black PVC), Olivia (doesn't play an instrument but who else can sing and smile while manouevering around acrobats on roller skates?), Jimmy and Paul (got the eye roll at 2:31 well and truly licked - amazing!)...... PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 16:13, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
My oh my, I can't remember the original video looking that good. Hair extensions to die for!! And Tracey certainly does matter. For one thing, a great Angela she is making, no? Olivia also looks good in black leather, I seem to remember. As for cover versions... some are timeless (hair almost as good....). Martinevans123 (talk) 16:34, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable passengers and crew are not generally named in articles on aircraft accidents and incidents, whether they survive or not. But I think this is more or a convention that a strict rule. I see that CEO Zafar Masood is currently a redlink over at Bank of Punjab. Perhaps it's now time he had an article. As far as I know the other survivor, engineer Mohammad Zubair, is not mentinoed anywhere at en.Wikipedia. Here's a story about which seats they occupied on the aircraft (from a newspaper source we can't use): [41]Martinevans123 (talk) 06:32, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not having an article doesn't mean non-notability (or being mentioned in an article). In fact, notability outside of Wikipedia is a criteria for a Wikipedia article on a topic being created. See WP:BLP and WP:N. People can be mentioned on case-by-case basis if they're only famous for one incidence, see WP:BLPNAME.
It's shocking I have to tell this to someone here so much longer than me, while I only read and learnt about these rules for the first time today. Saynotodrugs12 (talk) 13:09, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As I asked above, what did you mean by "for now" exactly? Very sorry if you're shocked. Perhaps you think years of consensus at aircraft accident articles counts for nothing. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:13, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand, where did I say "for now".
And no, those "years of consensus count for nothing". There are articles where victim names are included (even of crimes) even if they're famous for one incidence. You can't make up your own preferred policies over an actual policy. And you can't set up your own policy of notability. The consensus can decide on a case-by-case basis, not ban mentioning names permanently. Saynotodrugs12 (talk) 13:21, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
While I do see you violating the STATUSQUO as wrong and worth mentioning, I don't see it as anything severe and thus there is no need for any action "for now". Given how long you have been here, it is still concerning. Saynotodrugs12 (talk) 13:34, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ah right, no action. What a relief. Over my single revert of your addition. I'm really not sure there's been time, even by now, for any "status quo" at that article. But sorry you are concerned. Seems I'll have to watch my step. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:39, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The survivor names were added by you [42]. That now you're supporting removing them means only one thing: you have little knowledge about the policies. Then there's also the problem of you being endlessly sarcastic (in a mean way). Saynotodrugs12 (talk) 13:55, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure sarcasm is a blockable offence, endless or not, or in a "mean way" or not, but you could give it a try. So, I'm in trouble for adding the names and I'm also in trouble for deleting the names. Seems I can't win. But I generally find that collaborative discussion is more productive then trying to get other editors blocked. Martinevans123 (talk) 14:06, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well it does imply disrespect on your part. I'm not implying you're in trouble, but your edits are disruptive. And btw I did already start a discussion long ago, the two editors have only bothered to respond just once, and that too wasn't even a discussion. According to them I'm completely wring and disruptive, and they're right. After that, they didn't bother to reply. You know that already. Before that all they did was endlessly revert. I'm the only one trying to actually discuss anything at all. Saynotodrugs12 (talk) 14:42, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"My edits are disruptive". Quite a general statement there. Discussion usually involves more than one person, I've found. Good luck over at AN/I! Martinevans123 (talk) 14:50, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I did say, "I'm the only one trying to actually discuss anything at all." When I say I started discussion, I of course mean posting the first message hoping others will join it. Of course the two users I reauested to be blocked only commented once, that too to bash me. It isn't my fault, that some users don't want to discuss. Saynotodrugs12 (talk) 15:10, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not the one who merely reverts and then doesn't bother to discuss a dispute. You're the one being combative here and the people you defend are combative too. Saynotodrugs12 (talk) 15:34, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I see. First I know nothing about policy after being here for 13 years, then I'm violating the STATUSQUO, then I'm making up my own preferred policies over an actual policy, then I'm being "endlessly sarcastic (in a mean way)", and then "my edits are disruptive", and then "I'm the one being combative". Well thanks for the pep talk, Sayno. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:38, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Martinevans123, told he can't wallow with his pet pigs again
Hope I’m not intruding on what looks like a scintillating discussion (above)! Glad you liked St Andrew’s. Elizabeth Wilbraham is an interesting character and there’s more work to be done. Hope all is well with you and yours, and between us. All the very best. KJP1 (talk) 18:15, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm really sorry it came across as harsh. I should have worded it better. But I also have history with that particular editor, and my encounter with them led me to giving up Wikipedia:Articles for creation, something I really enjoyed and where I thought I was making a useful contribution. I just didn't want you to go down the same path. So glad that we're good. Take care. Ever, KJP1 (talk) 20:34, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I understand why did you remove the link I edited to PIA8303 page, but I would kindly ask you to consider to include it. I agree that the investigation of the Pakistani accident is in a very early phase and there are too many things that could come from the analysis of flight and cockpit voice recorders, etc. I follow the news with great care and using all experience to find the reliable sources. For now I understand that PIA8303 came down "hot and high" with an extreme sink rate that could mean a long range of things and makes it too early to state what caused the tragedy, while MALEV case was a clear pilot error and skipping SOP items. But the mere facts that both planes came down fast, gear up, scratch the runway for several hundred feets then got airborne again make the two cases quite similar to attract the mind. At this point the available height and speed data from flightradar are showing the energy management issues (even though we don't know why they occured) and the landing marks on the runway and the state of the torn engine No.1 with almost intact blades and the photographic evidences from the CCTV images are supporting the likeliness of a great part of the events.
This is why I kindly ask you to consider to include the link I suggested—perhaps later when more official information is available.
On the cheers part of your talk page, at the very bottom, it seems to contain every part past that. Did you know? New3400 (talk) 21:32, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Just saw this, and would like to ask the same thing. Your non-stop participation on Wikipedia has stopped. I hope you are well and safe. Give us a ping and let us know! Softlavender (talk) 21:59, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I thought you'd died, and that made me sad. But now it turns out you haven't died, but haven't even said hello, and that makes me mad. And sad. Sad and mad. Sad mad, lad. Bad! EEng00:20, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's not the first time this joker has reverted the news of a death. I can't remember which one it was he did it to fairly recently, but it may be worth looking at that (if I can remember it) to see if the oversighting is worth it. My thoughts are that it possibly isn't. - SchroCat (talk) 21:20, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Another one with a similar name came to revert on Morricone, but - intended or not - "unverted" only some author names, the last edit happening that is, and immediately reverted by SchroCat. PtLs seem to be worse in English than I am. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:45, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I had added SchroCat and you and some more to the credits, but it seems that the template takes only 3. Everybody feeling they deserve it, please simply copy. - Martin, we have this joke especially for you (but I'm not sure it translates well enough): Two geese meet, says one "de:Spiel mir das Lied vom Tod" (the German title of C'era una volta il West, and literally: "Play the song of death for me"), and the other sings "Sankt Maaaatin, Sa-ankt Maaaatin" - see? - Completely different topic: Did you know that I was afraid that Mathsci wouldn't edit again? But he did (compare). - We sang at church (St. Martin) last Sunday, first time since March, pictured on my talk, - made me write a new article about enlightenment ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:40, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
aI gave it a start, - the festivals are missing, infobox, wayback references (which don't translate, need manual attention), also haven't checked refs yet ... - need food first. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:36, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for appreciating the changes in Coleman Frog page. You have a great user page. If you have time, will you please check out, the other pages that I will be editing. I also would like to ask, as a new user, if you are not bothered, can i seek some help from time to time!
--AranyaPathak (talk) 19:04, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello AranyaPathak. I'm not sure either, as you seem to have provided good sources. Perhaps the editor who reverted will reply to your question at Talk:Devil Bird and explain more what they mean by "Orally transmitted narratives". Regards. p.s. I have added your signature to your Talk page post. Martinevans123 (talk) 07:14, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Re this edit: that paragraph contains a quote from Donald Trump: "go to Europe and the roads are opposite." That's clearly nonsense - most of Europe drives on the right, with only the UK and Ireland on the left. I thought showing the map would make that clear without running into POV issues. Feel free to adjust the text or caption if you can think of a way to make the relevance clearer, or remove the map entirely if you like. Modest Geniustalk17:03, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Some fALL fan on my twitter feed asked today what rock musician would you most like to be stuck with on a 20 hour flight....best reply was Nick Drake. Ha, least he wouldn't be bothering with small talk. anyway, shame about Peter Green RIP, though was never on his side in those romance battles. Ceoil (talk) 16:15, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Opps. My mistake, Although I love albatross and that, and always bought into the the acid casualty/recluse persona, am so far on team Nicks re the 1970s incarnation, I could care less about the others. Anyway, [hangs head], yes he was way before that, and a rather dignified man. RIP Peter Green.[45]Ceoil (talk) 21:28, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:Found a Job.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Thanks very much for your edits on this and my other efforts. Just looking at your 'assuming this was the name of a dwelling, now lost ' comment - I took the 'Esgair-ordd' from WDB who presumably sourced it from Caleb's first census appearance in 1891 aged 7 at the address. I did find this family member's archived internet page though which has pictures of the current Rees residence in Whitechurch (2 Calebs born there apparently) as it is now and also as it was in 1865 on a photo supplied by Caleb Rees of Laugharne. It is identified as follows "First we went to Rhos Fach (the farm house where Caleb Rees was born) [..] This is Rhos Fach. (picture) The 1841 census listed my 3xGreat Grandparents William and Mary Rees and ten children, including my 2xGreat Grandfather Caleb Rees at Rhos Fach." and I'm now wondering whether to change the name in the article and diverge from WDB - citing the 1841-91 census returns not the weblink, your thoughts would be appreciated. Horatius At The Bridge (talk) 13:36, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
But one might expect a census return to be more reliable than a WP:SPS. Dr Mary Auronwy James ought to know her stuff, didn't she? It seems she was born in 1932, but I'm not sure she is still around to ask. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:50, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I now have an extra resource, the Dr Mary Auronwy James I tried contact about this was born in 1919 and died 2004 - so now you've found another I can badger in her dotage if other discrepancies turn up ! Horatius At The Bridge (talk) 12:54, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, well I only assumed she was the right one. Another distinctive name that seems to be duplicated in a small (academic) region!? How very confusing.... Martinevans123 (talk) 13:24, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As a postscript, (because I believe you also have an affection for the land of our fathers) you may find this short article by Caleb Rees from 1933 about his great uncle Caleb Rees of interest. Think it explains the dodgy link to Rhos Fach by the current US branch of his family. Sadly it's difficult to squeeze into his article Horatius At The Bridge (talk) 19:07, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"A prominent Welsh minister travelling home one night was greatly annoyed when a young man much the worse for drink came and sat next to him on the bus.
“Young man,” he declared, “do you not realise you are on the road to perdition?”
“Oh, hell,” replied the drunkard. “I could have sworn this was the bus to Llanelli."
there is a certain sense of enjoyment delightfully insane sense of a mix of Ivor Cutler and Edmund Gorey and of course those whom you link - that you are here despite everything - keep it up sir! whatever it may be... JarrahTree12:44, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
very sorry I have no interest in pursuing the aspects of living in lift wells for extended time periods - the sense of vogon poetry was to attempt to avert lengthy discussion of the all the permutations of what can be done (or not) with tags related to the project. No harm intended. JarrahTree12:50, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
the little grey cells arent as functioning as in full power as in the past - was what we engaged in the vaieties of the propsect of the fate of the espionage and intellgigence projects so manymany years ago ? JarrahTree12:53, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
never apologise for such adventures, there is always the delighteful potential to be an eviscerated zarniwoop mixed up ina room full of vogon underwear... JarrahTree13:06, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There are discussions I try at almost all cost to not take part in. Mozart was an exception. Another display of our welcoming culture, grrrr. Left me speechless, not only because I reached the 2 comments I allow myself from time to time. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:58, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
... but here's for lighter summer fare, and a good promotion concept - sickening to remember though how the author died, and the illustrator had to emigrate (to success). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:02, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ble mae'r Wicipedia??Croeso I oleuadau coch (and whoever wrote an English only sign can expect to come home to a warm fire, because Welsh Nationalists will have set it alight....)
Ha! Well, I guess that's how roads work.... but I do hope he keeps his eyes on the road occasionally. (That bit by Talgarth can be a bit dodgy!) 13:18, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
hahah - the vogon poetry is on repeat, is on repeat, is on repeat, I'll say it again, the vogon poetry in on repeat, is on repeat. In some cultural contexts (guess which) repetition like that is an assertion of 'proof'... JarrahTree09:34, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Mr Tree. I was travelling on a bus last night and a perfect stranger happened to come and sit down at a (suitably socially-distanced) seat and strike up conversation about the global COVID pandemic. Naturally, our discussions soon turned to skull images on Wikipedia project banners. Apparently they are entirely suitable and no-one ever complains about them. In fact, they are accepted as a "universal symbol of death" (even on the "rather boisterous" late-night service to Pontarddulais...) So I think that's decided then. Reg "On The Buses" Varney 123 (talk) 09:49, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Just a reminder, you appear to be alive again this time, but the skull's still ticking, eyes evershifting, to, fro, to, fro...no wait, that was that black cat clock from that one show once! The point remains, as go the trains, mee-ow, mee-ow, mee-ow...Happy Halloween, better late than never, try to enjoy the moonlight! InedibleHulk (talk) 05:13, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The next person died too soon, Birol Ünel, and then a reliable source has to speak about him not paying fines. A shame, on top of another article that was tagged for no references. Help welcome. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:18, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That's very sad news indeed. Jerome's knowledge of music was so extensive and his edits were always careful and considered. One of the best content creators. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:56, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Ali Beatriz. I'm really not sure what the difference is between a Red Notice and a Red Diffusion Notice. The source provided by User:Burrobert doesn't seem to provide any clarity that anything was definitely issued. The original source of the claim seems to be The Mail on Sunday, with all those other media outlets just re-reporting it? If this was in a private email to Dunn's parents, the newspaper must have had their permission to publish it. The Northamptonshire Police later denied it was ever made, so perhaps they made a mistake; yes, there are less sources reporting the denial, but perhaps because it wasn't such headline-grabbing news. Perhaps the best we could do would be to include a narrative, along the one of "The Mail on Sunday reported that.... but this was later denied by the Northamptonshire Police...". I think DeFacto is right to err on the side of caution, unless/ until clearer or more definitive sources could be found. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:03, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to add my voice to these messages. And do a funny little dance, with a hat on, but that's just me. Hope you're "all good" comme on dit.DBaK (talk) 08:42, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
I just received an email reply from Martin - he says "Yes, I am ok, thanks. Sorry have not been around for a while. Just having a bit of a rest." That's a relief! JezGrove (talk) 10:19, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And I got a "thanks" notification from him. I'm so glad to learn that things are OK. And frankly, I should follow his good example and find something better to do than to keep looking in on this website. --Tryptofish (talk) 19:20, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You mean we should get an actual life?! (Although with my puny edit count perhaps I already have one, but failed to notice in this miserable year - roll on 2021!) JezGrove (talk) 19:33, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
We are a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Ricky Martin and his discography. If you would be interested in joining feel free to visit the Participants Page!
Thank You.
I hope this holiday season is festive and fulfilling and filled with love and kindness, and that 2021 will be safe, successful and rewarding...keep hope alive....Modernist (talk) 13:26, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Seasons greetings. Hope you and yours are safe and well during this rather bleak period, though I think we will get through it. Best Ceoil (talk) 23:01, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Always great to see you around Martin. ps, as a professional Welshman, you might enjoythis. Its a pity Brydon's Annually Retentive didnt get its due, have been looking for 10 years for copies on youtube, vemo, torrents...and nuffink. Ceoil (talk) 12:36, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
... and not even any smartarse comments an ting, but I just wanted to say that I am very pleased that you have edited recently again in this magnificent ermmm brain factory, which is less fun with you more quiet. No pressure though. Cheers DBaK (talk) 11:54, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Amen to that. (And Google translate tells me that the word is also "amen" in Welsh, which comes as quite a surprise and a bit of disappointment to me. I had rather hoped for something with about twenty consonants and zero vowels, as opposed to two of each.) --Tryptofish (talk) 22:11, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"O thou whose face hath felt the Winter’s wind, Whose eye has seen the snow-clouds hung in mist, And the black elm tops ‘mong the freezing stars! To thee the spring will be a harvest time." ---"The Winter’s Wind" (1818)
Hi there Gareth. I do hope you are keeping safe and well. Yes, I know just what you mean. But I found a very robust rumba flamenca version on line (it's on their 1992 album Cover, apparently.) "Por el camino del desierto, El viento me despeina"... A very Happy New Year to you too. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:56, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Martin,
thanks for keeping an eye on John Keats. I am not on WP any more, but the article looks in pretty good shape. I appreciate your continued work on the poetry articles. Happy New year to you. Anna (talk)01:51, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your addition to Concorde has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 18:32, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Oh dear! What have I started? this could go on forever. Gareth Griffith-Jones (contribs) (talk) 11:15, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Wales, it'll show the flag, so... Awaiting your quick response. Aziraphale yu (talk) 18:32, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Use of racial slur regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Kees08 (Talk) 00:07, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Just curious...I just read WP:NOTCENSORED and WP:USERTALKBLOG - for future reference, can someone point me to the policy that was violated, please? Atsme Talk 📧 19:22, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is LouiseFeb1974. Thank you. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:23, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Horatius At The Bridge (talk) 12:54, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
![[47]](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51f3vrnrjXL._AC_SX425_.jpg){kind=link}
